lib/modules: Rename _module.assertions to _module.checks
This commit is contained in:
+36
-30
@@ -103,7 +103,13 @@ rec {
|
||||
type = types.bool;
|
||||
internal = prefix != [];
|
||||
default = check;
|
||||
description = "Whether to check whether all option definitions have matching declarations.";
|
||||
description = ''
|
||||
Whether to check whether all option definitions have matching
|
||||
declarations.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that this has nothing to do with the similarly named
|
||||
<option>_module.checks</option> option
|
||||
'';
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
_module.freeformType = mkOption {
|
||||
@@ -123,11 +129,11 @@ rec {
|
||||
'';
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
_module.assertions = mkOption {
|
||||
_module.checks = mkOption {
|
||||
description = ''
|
||||
Assertions and warnings to trigger during module evaluation. The
|
||||
Evaluation checks to trigger during module evaluation. The
|
||||
attribute name will be displayed when it is triggered, allowing
|
||||
users to disable/change these assertions again if necessary. See
|
||||
users to disable/change these checks if necessary. See
|
||||
the section on Warnings and Assertions in the manual for more
|
||||
information.
|
||||
'';
|
||||
@@ -151,7 +157,7 @@ rec {
|
||||
# TODO: Rename to assertion? Or allow also setting assertion?
|
||||
options.enable = mkOption {
|
||||
description = ''
|
||||
Whether to enable this assertion.
|
||||
Whether to enable this check.
|
||||
<note><para>
|
||||
This is the inverse of asserting a condition: If a certain
|
||||
condition should be <literal>true</literal>, then this
|
||||
@@ -164,7 +170,7 @@ rec {
|
||||
|
||||
options.type = mkOption {
|
||||
description = ''
|
||||
The type of the assertion. The default
|
||||
The type of the check. The default
|
||||
<literal>"error"</literal> type will cause evaluation to fail,
|
||||
while the <literal>"warning"</literal> type will only show a
|
||||
warning.
|
||||
@@ -176,7 +182,7 @@ rec {
|
||||
|
||||
options.message = mkOption {
|
||||
description = ''
|
||||
The assertion message to display if this assertion triggers.
|
||||
The message to display if this check triggers.
|
||||
To display option names in the message, add
|
||||
<literal>options</literal> to the module function arguments
|
||||
and use <literal>''${options.path.to.option}</literal>.
|
||||
@@ -190,24 +196,24 @@ rec {
|
||||
options.triggerPath = mkOption {
|
||||
description = ''
|
||||
The <literal>config</literal> path which when evaluated should
|
||||
trigger this assertion. By default this is
|
||||
trigger this check. By default this is
|
||||
<literal>[]</literal>, meaning evaluating
|
||||
<literal>config</literal> at all will trigger the assertion.
|
||||
<literal>config</literal> at all will trigger the check.
|
||||
On NixOS this default is changed to
|
||||
<literal>[ "system" "build" "toplevel"</literal> such that
|
||||
only a system evaluation triggers the assertions.
|
||||
only a system evaluation triggers the checks.
|
||||
<warning><para>
|
||||
Evaluating <literal>config</literal> from within the current
|
||||
module evaluation doesn't cause a trigger. Only accessing it
|
||||
from outside will do that. This means it's easy to miss
|
||||
assertions if this option doesn't have an externally-accessed
|
||||
failing checks if this option doesn't have an externally-accessed
|
||||
value.
|
||||
</para></warning>
|
||||
'';
|
||||
# Mark as internal as it's easy to misuse it
|
||||
internal = true;
|
||||
type = types.uniq (types.listOf types.str);
|
||||
# Default to [], causing assertions to be triggered when
|
||||
# Default to [], causing checks to be triggered when
|
||||
# anything is evaluated. This is a safe and convenient default.
|
||||
default = [];
|
||||
example = [ "system" "build" "vm" ];
|
||||
@@ -253,13 +259,13 @@ rec {
|
||||
else recursiveUpdate freeformConfig declaredConfig;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
Inject a list of assertions into a config value, corresponding to their
|
||||
Inject a list of checks into a config value, corresponding to their
|
||||
triggerPath (meaning when that path is accessed from the result of this
|
||||
function, the assertion triggers).
|
||||
function, the check triggers).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
injectAssertions = assertions: config: let
|
||||
# Partition into assertions that are triggered on this level and ones that aren't
|
||||
parted = lib.partition (a: length a.triggerPath == 0) assertions;
|
||||
injectChecks = checks: config: let
|
||||
# Partition into checks that are triggered on this level and ones that aren't
|
||||
parted = lib.partition (a: length a.triggerPath == 0) checks;
|
||||
|
||||
# From the ones that are triggered, filter out ones that aren't enabled
|
||||
# and group into warnings/errors
|
||||
@@ -270,45 +276,45 @@ rec {
|
||||
errorTrigger = value:
|
||||
if byType.error or [] == [] then value else
|
||||
throw ''
|
||||
Failed assertions:
|
||||
Failed checks:
|
||||
${lib.concatMapStringsSep "\n" (a: "- ${a.show}") byType.error}
|
||||
'';
|
||||
# Trigger for both warnings and errors
|
||||
trigger = value: warningTrigger (errorTrigger value);
|
||||
|
||||
# From the non-triggered assertions, split off the first element of triggerPath
|
||||
# to get a mapping from nested attributes to a list of assertions for that attribute
|
||||
# From the non-triggered checks, split off the first element of triggerPath
|
||||
# to get a mapping from nested attributes to a list of checks for that attribute
|
||||
nested = lib.zipAttrs (map (a: {
|
||||
${head a.triggerPath} = a // {
|
||||
triggerPath = lib.tail a.triggerPath;
|
||||
};
|
||||
}) parted.wrong);
|
||||
|
||||
# Recursively inject assertions if config is an attribute set and we
|
||||
# have assertions under its attributes
|
||||
# Recursively inject checks if config is an attribute set and we
|
||||
# have checks under its attributes
|
||||
result =
|
||||
if isAttrs config
|
||||
then
|
||||
mapAttrs (name: value:
|
||||
if nested ? ${name}
|
||||
then injectAssertions nested.${name} value
|
||||
then injectChecks nested.${name} value
|
||||
else value
|
||||
) config
|
||||
else config;
|
||||
in trigger result;
|
||||
|
||||
# List of assertions for this module evaluation, where each assertion also
|
||||
# List of checks for this module evaluation, where each check also
|
||||
# has a `show` attribute for how to show it if triggered
|
||||
assertions = mapAttrsToList (name: value:
|
||||
checks = mapAttrsToList (name: value:
|
||||
let id =
|
||||
if lib.hasPrefix "_" name then ""
|
||||
else "[${showOption prefix}${optionalString (prefix != []) "/"}${name}] ";
|
||||
in value // {
|
||||
show = "${id}${value.message}";
|
||||
}
|
||||
) config._module.assertions;
|
||||
) config._module.checks;
|
||||
|
||||
finalConfig = injectAssertions assertions (removeAttrs config [ "_module" ]);
|
||||
finalConfig = injectChecks checks (removeAttrs config [ "_module" ]);
|
||||
|
||||
checkUnmatched =
|
||||
if config._module.check && config._module.freeformType == null && merged.unmatchedDefns != [] then
|
||||
@@ -931,7 +937,7 @@ rec {
|
||||
visible = false;
|
||||
apply = x: throw "The option `${showOption optionName}' can no longer be used since it's been removed. ${replacementInstructions}";
|
||||
});
|
||||
config._module.assertions =
|
||||
config._module.checks =
|
||||
let opt = getAttrFromPath optionName options; in {
|
||||
${showOption optionName} = {
|
||||
enable = mkDefault opt.isDefined;
|
||||
@@ -1001,7 +1007,7 @@ rec {
|
||||
})) from);
|
||||
|
||||
config = {
|
||||
_module.assertions =
|
||||
_module.checks =
|
||||
let warningMessages = map (f:
|
||||
let val = getAttrFromPath f config;
|
||||
opt = getAttrFromPath f options;
|
||||
@@ -1072,7 +1078,7 @@ rec {
|
||||
});
|
||||
config = mkMerge [
|
||||
{
|
||||
_module.assertions.${showOption from} = {
|
||||
_module.checks.${showOption from} = {
|
||||
enable = mkDefault (warn && fromOpt.isDefined);
|
||||
type = "warning";
|
||||
message = "The option `${showOption from}' defined in ${showFiles fromOpt.files} has been renamed to `${showOption to}'.";
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user