informis/textfiles
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Initial commit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
root@procul
2021-04-15 13:31:59 -05:00
commit 278a90f7ce
57951 changed files with 34606208 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/4thstate.asc
+1320
View File
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/70l7gt.asc
+264
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
May 16, 1993
70L7GT.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Scott Kirk.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Comments
The following file is a composite all referenced to the file
TESLAFE.ZIP on KeelyNet. What follows are the related message
threads that hint of a future release of information should our
contact succeed in acquiring the information and translating it
to English.
The Tesla Free Energy Convertor is a quite intriguing piece of
history that seems to have operated from an energy source most
closely identified as ZPE or some kind of "hyperspatial
gateway". The device either collected extant electrical energy
or actually pulled it from the hyperspace region as in the SWEET
or ADAMS machines. We will all have a better understanding when
someone successfully duplicates any of these devices.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Message 66 DATE/TIME: 04/24/93 09:31
From : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP) -- RECEIVED --
To : MARK MANSFIELD
Subject: Notes
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Hi Mark! I will be here this weekend and have been "catching" the
phone before the answering machine takes over...some fellow called
up from Indiana or somewhere like that saying he had emigrated to
the US from Germany around 192...he says he has a fairly detailed
article on the TESLA mystery power box as detailed in TESLAFE.ZIP...
claims there were only three tubes and they were all BEAM RECTIFIER
TYPES, hell he even gave us the tube numbers...(70L7GT)...anyway,
seems this character has tons of info and is willing to translate a
very rare German book with some chapters that everyone here will
find of interest, so guess I will call him this weekend...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
from another message -
Re the beam rectifier tubes reportedly used in Tesla's box -
rectification implies the reception of an AC signal, which might
imply that Tesla had another "toy" nearby broadcasting power, albeit
on a smaller scale than some of his earlier projects. (We believe
this to indicate a smaller Wardenclyffe but there is no evidence of
this....)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 1
from another message -
Yes, and I just got another long distance correlation to that beam
rectifier tube, seems it used a MERCURY DIODE (can we say ion
acoustic modulation)...a close friend said his brother was attending
a graduation party for his class (electronics) and was invited to a
professors house...he was shown a golf cart that contained only one
battery and a mercury diode beam rectifier tube...it was in fact a
free energy charging circuit to which the professor would give no
information...anyway, trying to call the German fellow today to get
some more info and see what we can "swap out"..
--------------------------------------------------------------------
from another message -
In case you have taken the file TESLAFE describing the free energy
device that Tesla constructed and tested in a Pierce Arrow
automobile in the early 30's, we have been given additional
information from a nice fellow in California. He emigrated to the
States from Germany in 192 and has been following the free energy
field for many years. He says there is a book or document that
gives QUITE A FEW DETAILS on the Tesla Free Energy Converter and if
he can persuade his German source to share it, he will send it our
way for distribution to the various nets and researchers...
This fellow is definitely one of us and is HEAVY into the sharing of
information with the express purpose of building working machines
that EVERYONE can use.
Our new friend says that the Tesla F/E Converter used 3 vacuum tubes
of the designation 70L7GT...this particular tube is listed as a BEAM
POWER TUBE, also called a BEAM RECTIFIER TUBE.
One of our other contacts suggested that this might be a mercury
tube which would produce the ION ACOUSTIC modulations in the mercury
vapor that Moray King mentions in "Tapping the Zero Point Energy"
and which T. Henry Moray says is necessary for the successful
tapping of the vacuum energy.
On speaking with our California source this Sunday, he says his book
on tubes does not show this to be a mercury tube although the
possibility was at first fascinating.
One further comment made (by our California friend) was that the
mysterious power reduction as mentioned in the filed ROSEN1 with the
Sweet VTA might be due to a polarization current directly associated
with the Earth's magnetic fields. He suggests that anyone working
with such a device (a Sweet VTA - Vacuum Tube Amplifier) might
orient the machine so that the NORTH pole was DOWN, or facing EAST
or facing WEST...these are possibilities and speculatively based on
the various magnetic field patterns of the earth. Personally I
think it has something to do with pressure or potential reductions
in the ambient Aether for a given area...
Despite the Michelson-Morley findings claiming there is NO AETHER
because they could not detect any aberrations, (they fail to
prominently mention the 12 mile variation from experiment to
experiment which would lead one to believe in Aether potential
changes as a result of entrainment by the Earth)...
Page 2
Anyway, thought this info might prove of use to all of us working on
the duplication and improvement of such free energy devices. Should
our California friend succeed in acquiring the details of the Tesla
F/E device and translating them to English, we will have them online
TOOTSWEET (a pun???)....hang in there, we get closer everyday as
long as everyone shares....>>> Jerry
--------------------------------------------------------------------
from another message -
Per your earlier post on the Tesla F/E box and the 70L7GT tubes it
(supposedly) used. To be honest, I have my doubts as the tube seems
almost a toy...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
from another message -
I have not seen the specs or anything beyond what the fellow told us
on the phone...guess we will have to wait for what he gets from his
German contact...you know, it does not take POWER to get the free
energy or anti-grav effects, simply a BIASING signal that serves to
"influence" or "re-direct" the flow....kind of like the passive
effect of the mirrored reflectors in a laser...they do nothing but
reflect until the intensity of the beam overcomes their reflective
ability, at which the now very powerful beam escapes...we shall see.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry:
Per your post about the Tesla F/E device...
The following data is copied verbatim from the 1964 RCA Receiving
Tube Manual. The 70L7GT is listed as a discontinued type so the
wonderful descriptions of other tubes in the manual is unavailable
for this type, however a table of discontinued types at the back of
the manual provided the following. The diagram is, of course,
irreproducible in ASCII but it looks like a very ordinary keyed
octal glass tube of its period, at 1-3/16" diameter, 2-7/8" high
(above chassis). It does not possess a metal "tit" at the top. It
appears that it's a dedicated-application tube for radio receivers
(it both rectifies and amplifies; cutting down on tube count and
saving manufacturing dollars) so I am immediately skeptical about
any real significance to this type. There are related types,
including the 117L7GT, but no direct substitution. Antique
Electronic Supply in Tempe AZ apparently stocks this tube. The
tube, used as indicated, appears very ordinary, however we can
assume that Tesla did not exactly follow RCA recommended application
tolerances (i.e. he hacked it).
S.K.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
70L7GT : RECTIFIER - BEAM POWER TUBE
Heater Voltage : 70 V
Heater Current : 150 mA
Use(s): Amplifier Unit as Class A Amplifier
Half Wave Rectifier
Page 3
CHARACTERISTICS AS AMPLIFIER
Plate Supply : 110 V
Grid Bias Volts : -7.5 V
Screen Supply : 110 V
Screen Current : 3.0 mA
Plate Current : 40.0 mA
AC Plate Resistance : 15000 ohm
Transconductance : 7500 micromhos
Amplification Factor : -----
Load for Power Output: 2000 ohm
Power Output : 1.8 W
CHARACTERISTICS AS RECTIFIER
Max. Peak Inverse Volts: 350 V
Max. DC Output mA : 70 mA
Max. Peak Plate mA : 420 mA
Minimum Total Effective
Plate Supply Impedance : 10 ohm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/a&m1.asc
View File
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/adams1.asc
+406
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,406 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : ADAMS1.ASC | Online Date : 12/17/94 |
| Contributed by : Bob Aldrich | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The ADAMS files currently on KeelyNet consist of 3 .ASC files (ADAMS1, ADAMS2
and ADAMS3) and 9 .GIFs all bundled together as ADAMS1_3.ZIP and ADAMSGIF.ZIP
on KeelyNet.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is taken from NEXUS New Times Magazine Dec - Jan 1993 Vol 2 #11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Adams Pulsed Electric Motor Generator
a free energy machine at last?
THE REAL MCCOY
It is with great excitement, and appreciation to the inventor, that Nexus
publishes the following information on the Permanent Magnet Electric D.C.
Motor Generator of Robert Adams, a former Chairman of the Institute of
Electrical & Electronics Engineers, Inc., U.S.A., (N.Z. Section).
After having his invention suppressed for over 20 years, Mr Adams, at the age
72, has decided to share his design with the world regardless of the
consequences. Mr. Adams' quest to bring "free" energy to the world has cost
him dearly as it has many other researchers who threaten to bring the
"establishment" undone.
He has survived an attempt on his life by an individual affiliated with the
New Zealand Secret Intelligence Service and the Central Intelligence Agency,
direct suppression of his invention by former (and recently deceased) Prime
Minister of New Zealand, Robert Muldoon, the giant British electronics
company, Lucus Industries, as well as numerous other insurmountable
difficulties that have been placed in his path. All because his invention
worked. And not only that, it is so simple, any electronics manufacturer or
skilled backyard-home-scientist could build one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
INVENTORS BEWARE!
In 1978 Mr. Adams discovered that inventors of machines or devices of high
energy efficiency capability ("Free" Energy) are not only refused patents, but
that in most cases, their inventions are classified under the "Military Use
Clause", which is, of course, international. Inventors are prohibited from
publishing details of their devices or promoting them in any manner of their
invention is classified under this clause. In other words, their devices
automatically become the sole property of the "establishment".
The fact that there is an established mechanism to suppress energy inventions
of this nature has been a closely guarded secret for many years. Many
inventors have made such claims, but the general public remain oblivious to
the fact that they are being deprived of clean and free energy by
organisations that would rather make money and hold power over the public,
that allow such technology to become widely available. Yet another example of
the abuse of power. (No pun intended.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"FREE" ENERGY
This motor generator would be called a "Free Energy" machine by most
individuals. It is, in fact, a device that converts the perpetual motion of
sub-atomic particles, known in physics terminology as "particle spin", into
conventional electric power. It is a widely accepted fact of physical law
that sub-atomic particles are in a state of perpetual motion. Anybody who
tells you that there is no such thing as perpetual motion is either ignorant
or a liar. As Robert Adams states, "Our universe is a sea of energy - free,
clean energy. It is all out there waiting for us to set sail upon it."
Adams has built a number of permanent magnet electric D.C. motor generators
based on the principle outlined in this article, some of which have
demonstrated an electrical efficiency of 690% and a mechanical efficiency of
620%. The devices run at room temperature. Any device that doesn't could not
be running at over 100% efficiency, as heat is the major result of hysteresis
losses that are induces in any conventional electric motor or generator.
Radiated heat is a sure-fire sign that a power generator is not running over
unity, as all heat radiated by such a device is wasted energy.
I will remind readers once again at this point that Mr. Adams in not a fly-by-
night, propeller-head, whacko, techno-boffin. He is an electrical engineer
with over 60 years experience in the field of electrical engineering, which
has included designing and building equipment for use in power stations,
broadcasting facilities, airport communications centres, etc. He is a former
Chairman of the Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers, Inc., U.S.A.,
(N.Z. Section), and his resume includes personal referees ranging from a
former New Zealand Commissioner of Police, a former Chairman of Air New
Zealand, (and several technical specialists from the airline), as well as an
Ex-NASA scientist.
Nexus would recommend to anybody interest in, or presently building a device
of this nature, to try building a device based on Mr. Adams plans. His
machines have demonstrated the ability to generate free energy, unlike most of
the theoretical models that are promoted as over-unity devices.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The invention may be broadly said to be, an electric motor and/or generator
comprising a rotor consisting of a number of radially arrayed permanently
magnetised poles, and a stator consisting of a number of radially arrayed
permanently magnetised poles, together with a number of wound poles.
The rotor's permanently magnetised poles use ferrite magnetic cores, and may
comprise any even number of poles. The stator's wound poles employ steel or
iron cores. The device is essentially a D.C. machine, but may be fed A.C.
input with the use of a solid state converter. The Rotor uses a number of
similar polarity permanent magnetic poles, i.e., all-south or all-north.
A further set of wound poles are radially arrayed in the stator, and are
arranged in such manner as to be fed energy, that is excited by back E.M.F.
energy, from the poles of the rotor. Associated circuitry is provided to feed
the energy back to the drive poles of the motor.
The resulting characteristics of this design is that once the rotor is moved
from the position of equilibrium, each pole is attracted to, or repulsed by
the stator poles, but at a precise geometrical point with respect to them, the
input current to the drive coils ceases.
As a result, the collapsing field current is in the opposite direction to the
applied force, thus reversing the magnetic polarity of the stator coils. This
forces the rotor poles away (reaction), which is the instantaneous response of
a system to an applied force, and is manifested as the exertion of a force
equal in magnitude, but opposite in direction to the applied force.
Pulsing the D.C. input current, overcomes losses generated in conventional
motors. According to classical electrical engineering theory, efficiency is
greater the more nearly equal the Back E.M.F. (electro-motive force) is to the
applied voltage, i.e. the lower the input current.
Figure 6 shows that there is minimum 100% back E.M.F. relative to the supply
source on input D.C. voltage (according to classical electrical theory), which
virtually depicts a sine wave due to the effect of the collapsing field.
This effect also overcomes the electrodynamic torque problems associated with
conventional motor designs. (As input power varies with the duty cycle pulse;
i.e. the lower the input current, the lower the input current, and the lower
the speed, the greater the torque.) At clip-off, the back E.M.F. ceases, the
collapsing field takes over, opposing the outgoing rotor magnet and thus
increasing momentum. With this design force is applied twice during each D.C.
pulse, with pulse-on, and with pulse-off.
The timing of the pulses are determined by the dimensions of the motor itself,
i.e. the speed of rotation of the motor's central axle, the position of the
rotor magnets in relation to the stator windings, as well as the distance that
the rotor magnets travel when passing across the poles of the stator windings.
(See accompanying diagrams ADAMS1.GIF through ADAMS6.GIF).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONAL NOTES
Important Factors
1) Care must be exercised when assembling and wiring the drive windings to
make sure that their polarities match the rotor magnet polarity.
2) Common earthing must be avoided in order to preclude voltage and/or
current loops. (IF a number of drive windings do need to be commoned, use
very low resistance conductors and employ a transmission type earthing
system only).
Stator (Drive) winding resistances are your choice. Robert Adams' machines
were built varying from 0.03125 to 27 ohms per set. He has experimented with
two, four, and eight pole machines. Efficiency increases with the number of
wound poles in the stator.
Motor generators with a single, two, or three phase can be built to this
design. A number of rotors may be ganged together on the same shaft in order
to increase power output and does not require the use of any commutator,
brushes or slip rings, all of which contribute to energy losses in ordinary
motor generators.
Unlike conventional Series D.C. machines, this motor can be off-loaded, finds
its own speed, and will run at that speed indefinitely. A conventional DC
motor will run itself to destruction with off-loading. It requires no cooling,
nor any overload protection, even if short circuited.
A number of highly qualified individuals have seen these devices running and
producing energy at well above 100% efficiency. Let's hope that some of you
can achieve similar results.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING PROCEDURES OF THE ADAMS MOTOR GENERATOR
An ideal drive winding pole can be very readily available by obtaining some
B.P.O. 3000 type relays (ex Telecom). Simply remove present winding, cut core
in half, re-thread, assemble and fill with winding. This is a quick and cheap
method of obtaining a very high quality non-retentive steel core. As
aforementioned, winding resistances used by the inventor varied between
0.03125 to 27 ohms.
The above windings described are ample to drive prototypes even in a 180
degree application. You will find speeds up to 2500 rpm with only two of these
windings 180 degrees apart - no problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For AC Output Coil Windings and Core.
Ideal cores can be built cheaply and quickly by dismantling a spare power of
audio transformer and utilising the "I" section laminations, obtain winding
former to fit same and it is ready for winding. Turns and gauge will depend on
what voltage and current you choose. Remember, at this stage, you should only
be building a demonstration model, so to speak.
After a few changes, corrections and/or general modifications you will be
ready to put a mechanical and/or electrical load on the machine. For an
electrical load it is suggested you firstly wire up a bank of 6 - 12 LEDs.
If everything is go, then switch over to torch lamps: Later on with a bigger
machine - car lamps, or maybe household lamps and a mechanical load
simultaneously.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Efficiency Testing
Milliamp meters are useless for this machine - do not use for testing. Use
only high quality digital true RMS meters, with input power, for high
accuracy, use ONLY a high quality electronic wattmeter: These instruments
measure extremely accurately any wave-shape. A good twin-beam oscilloscope is
a must: So too a high quality electronic temperature-measuring instrument with
appropriate probe.
Drill dead centre of one or both cores, as per drawing. Probe must be good
fit. If, after one hour of running on load and temperature is around 40
degrees, that will indicate things are most likely working correctly.
Don't forget your ambient in Australia will be considerably higher than ours.
Read the inventor's rotary and solid state efficiency measurement data sheet.
Rotor-stator air gap is not critical, but the closer the better.
As stated elsewhere, the stator pole faces, if desired, may be reduced to 25%
of the rotor pole face area, hence large drive windings and high drive current
is not required.
With care to detail, correct mathematical calculations and high quality
instrumentation correctly utilised, incredible results can be expected. Study
data submitted shows those results have been attained on several machines.
Temperature of conventional machines internally reach boiling point after
fifteen minutes running. Check Adams Motor Generator after running on full
load for 48 hours, or after fifteen minutes if you prefer not to wait that
long. You will be very pleasantly surprised - I refer to maximum loading
conditions, not free running.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mechanical Loading Test:
A high quality strain measuring instrument must be used in the universal "pony
brake" method of mechanical load testing.
RPM tests must also be obtained with a high quality tachometer and/or
oscilloscope reading and use the universal equation to calculate mechanical
machine efficiency.
Note: Very Important Factor:
As you increase duty cycle, current input will increase and efficiency will
decrease. From random test sheet results I have chosen it is very clear what
to expect upon increasing duty cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
The Adams Motor Generator is so efficient, so simple and consequently it's
construction is such that is surpasses overwhelmingly anything before it, thus
lending itself admirably to mass production.
One of a number of unique features of the Adams Machine is the fact that the
same rotor poles are utilised simultaneously for driving the machine and
generating output energy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Construction Equation - Adams Motor Generator - 20/12/76
It was found, after considerable development work, that maximum electro-
magnetic effect produced in the stalloy stacked generating pole windings
occurred when the dimension of the mating end of the stacks were four times
greater in area than the rotor magnet's pole area. Hence the overall design
of the machine incorporates this derived ratio of one to four. (The Adams
Equation, as applies only to the Adams Machine).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feedback - 20/12/1976
The feedback, produced by the output generating coil, produces a polarity
reversal normally resulting in large eddy current losses in conventional
machines, but, in the Adams Machine, it is harnessed to develop further
additional torque to the magnetic rotor. The larger the output generating
coils the greater the torque delivered to the rotor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power Factor - 1/7/1976
There is no power factor loss because the Adams Machine runs in a condition of
resonance. Therefore, the Power Factor Loss is zero.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE ADAMS PULSED ELECTRIC GENERATOR - The Conspiracy
I have for many years been waiting the opportunity to make a start on writing
about my life as an electrical engineer and inventor, but have been reluctant
to do so because of the possible reaction from one formidable individual who
was instrumental in causing me untold frustration, ridicule, anxiety,
financial problems, and health decline.
With the passing of Rob Muldoon, I now feel more deposed to exposing what he
and his regime subjected me to, and the possible subsequent valuable loss to
our country as a result. I personally had a meeting with Muldoon and others
at his home office in Tamaki regarding my invention.
The result of the meeting was that he recommended me to the Inventions
Development Authority. In all good faith I duly contacted the inventions
development authority and that folks was the beginning of the saga which was
destined to follow.
The Inventions Development Authority passed me along to DSIR, who at the time
were frantically working on their own energy systems, and assisting Government
with various 'Think Big' projects.
Time rolled on, and DSIR monkeyed me around for several months; there were, as
always, excuses for not proceeding with completion of their strange testing
apparatus to test my machine.
In the meantime, Rob Muldoon appoints himself Minister in Charge of SIS, the
department with world-wide connections to the CIA, ASIO, FBI and Interpol!
I had meanwhile, designed a bigger proving machine and had placed orders
overseas for magnets and devices for pulsing equipment. Time went by, well
beyond expected delivery dates, with no sign of the devices, nor any
correspondence pertaining to my orders to any of the electrical companies.
I lodged person-to-person calls to the people who originally signed the
confirming correspondence to me, to be told that "that person in no longer
with us and we cannot help you any more."
Muldoon had by now, committed the whole country to the New Plymouth Power
Station, Huntly Power Station, Marsden Oil Refinery, etc etc. The Government
signalled its intentions that is was in no way going to let a little outsider
like me come into the act with a revolutionary machine capable of countering
the so-called energy crisis.
Muldoon at this stage, had me well taped up so to speak, My phone, I was
informed, was tapped, my mail was intercepted and I was kept under
observation.
I held a number of meetings with the Chief Post Office Investigating Officer
regarding the matter of mail disappearance and interception, with the same
negative and unsatisfactory answers and results as from other Government
departments. After the lapse of several months, the machine was finally
evaluated by DSIR.
I must mention here an interesting fact regarding the evaluation of my machine
by the DSIR. It happens that a certain electrical engineer that I was involved
with, who incidentally, also evaluated my machine, informed me that the person
designated the role of evaluating my machine in DSIR, was in fact a mechanical
engineer with no background, knowledge, nor qualifications of any description
pertaining to electrical or electronic engineering, and further that the
Auckland Division did not posses a member on the staff qualified to undertake
such a project. This person none-the-less did do the evaluation and indeed
signed the test results.
(You may well wonder how did this independent electrical engineer have such
inside information on the DSIR? Well, it so happened that he himself had been
their one and only electrical engineer in the Auckland Division, and I might
add, a specialist on electrical motors too.)
That an unqualified person was assigned the task of evaluating the
possibilities of a revolutionary motor is further evidence to me of
conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DSIR Evaluation - 5.8% efficiency
Lucas Industries Evaluation - 100% efficiency!
Other independent eminent engineers' findings, including those of the ex-
electrical engineer from DSIR varied from 96.93% to 100% efficiency!
At this stage, I had unwittingly invited the then chief departmental district
electrical engineer to be present at my laboratory to witness the phenomenon
of one particular model displaying identical input and output wave forms on a
twin beam oscilloscope with the machine windings running at ambient
temperature, a condition which cannot be denied as proof of 100% efficiency,
without any further tests being required.
He conceded there was no doubt whatever what he was witnessing was real, but
like all academics who stick to their ivory tower scientific establishment
beliefs, he said it could not be done.
Upon reading certain of my writings, it will be found that at one time in
earlier years, I disbelieved in any kind of conspiracy regarding inventions
pertaining to energy efficiency, and certain communication installations. I
must now say, having unwittingly got myself into the web of the insidious
conspiracy, through treading the path of an inventor in the field of free
energy, that I now know from personal experience the pitfalls, stone walls,
and blatant obstacles and barriers designed to hamper and silence inventors
with such devices as energy efficient machines.
I decided to investigate the fate of a number of other excellent energy-
efficient inventions, and learned that too many good inventions were never
heard of again. Inventors themselves were turning into hermits, meeting with
unexplained accidents, even totally disappearing. In many cases their
laboratories were searched and ransacked, equipment confiscated and/or
destroyed, and even attempts made on their lives. Others are frequently bought
off in return for silence.
The conspirators, who are also the cartel operators are determined to continue
to make mankind use fossil fuel for all possible energy requirements and will
go to any lengths to achieve just that.
I have since superseded the above machine and have built and proven two
different types of self-sustaining motor generators with efficiency ratings
well beyond unity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nexus Magazine in conjunction with Robert Adams, will be publishing "The Adams
Pulsed Electric Motor Generator Manual". This manual will be available in mid-
December and will cost AUD$40.00 per copy (including postage).
Send to PO Box 30, Mapleton. Qld 4560 Australia.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Adams, 46 Landing Road, Whakatane, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/adams2.asc
+351
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,351 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : ADAMS2.ASC | Online Date : 12/17/94 |
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The ADAMS files currently on KeelyNet consist of 3 .ASC files (ADAMS1, ADAMS2
and ADAMS3) and 9 .GIFs all bundled together as ADAMS1_3.ZIP and ADAMSGIF.ZIP
on KeelyNet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
from NEXUS New Times - Volume 2, Number 13
Published in Australia (soon to be in the USA)
(tell Duncan you heard about them from KeelyNet)
Subscriptions $40 for six issues/one year
$75 for twelve issues/two years
Nexus Magazine
PO Box 30
Mapleton Qld. 4560
Australia
Tel (074) 429 280
FAX (074) 429 381
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adams Breaks the Gravity Barrier
Inventor Robert Adams appears to have broken the gravity barrier, with his
advanced Adams Electric Motor Generator operating in a high state of resonance
and apparently tapping gravitational energy.
"During the later months of 1992, I derived what I considered to be an
equation for possibly the ultimate in rotary motor generator design. The
purpose of this exercise, was to ascertain whether further unconventional
design features of the machine parameters, using this equation, proved certain
theories which I had previously discussed with Mr. Bruce Cathie, an
internationally recognized New Zealand researcher in this field. (Cathie is
the 'father' of grid harmonics)
Upon applying the 'equation' to the machine parameters and testing it, there
was no doubt the machine was running in a higher state of resonance than
previously obtained.
It had been arranged beforehand between myself and Mr. Cathie that, should the
results of this test be of some substance, Mr. Cathie would travel from
Auckland to Whakatane specifically to check the machine parameters with his
'harmonic equations'. These results confirmed the theory which we had
previously discussed and planned to implement.
The results of these first trial tests have been SUPERCEDED, with the new
figures obtained being found beyond anything that is known of in the present-
day field of free energy research. There is every possibility that these
latest figures, also, will be surpassed in the near future.
The equations and how they are applied are hidden within certain parameters,
and, to this end, it could be said that to reach the ultimate in rotary over-
unity devices is not possible without the correct application to all
parameters of the machine using the 'Adams Pulse Method' and the Adams-Cathie
equations.
The above methods and results give us a valuable lead in the realm of solid-
state gravitational energy research. The equations and methods of application
in design procedures, however, remain, at this stage, secret. The efficiency
figures possible from the device are such that they simply cannot be
published.
I wish readers to refer further to the following discussions on Wilhelm Muller
and Dr. Rolf Schaffranke, the general content of which relates to my discovery
of the mysteries of magnetism some twenty-four years ago."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Adams Pulsed Electric Motor Generator:
On Wilhelm Muller
"Reference to an article authored by Tom Valentine, California based freelance
journalist, in regard to claims by Wilhelm Muller and his magnet
manufacturers.
I must take Muller and his magnet manufacturers to task on their statement
that "magnets can do a tremendous amount of work" - this is not so.
In an over-unity rotary machine, the magnets are 'assisting' to run the
machine, but they are not generating the extra energy beyond the reaching of
100% efficiency. The magnets are not doing actual work, as such, beyond that
point.
It is likely Muller's machine is operating, according to the efficiency figure
Muller quoted, somewhere on the near lower end of a positive resonance curve.
From the generally known information on his device, this would be the likely
area in which it is operating. If this is so, then the chances of greater
efficiency are slim, particularly on account of it appearing to be operating
in a positive mode. For the rotor magnets to operate as a gate to harness
gravitational energy beyond unity, it must be in a negatively resonant mode
and not operating in a closed magnetic circuit system.
Bruce Cathie and I spent an entire day together in January 1993 going over his
harmonic equations in regard to my advanced machine, and confirmed that it was
running in an advanced state of resonance, harnessing gravitational energy and
demonstrating evidence of the magnets forming a 'gate' to harness one half-
cycle of the gravitational pulse, but doing no actual work over and above the
100%.
In regard to another claim by Muller that he had to use powerful neodymium
magnets, this also is contrary to our findings. It matters not whether you
use standard off-the-shelf 'alnico' magnets or powerful magnets, the results
are no different. It is not necessary to use powerful magnets to prove if a
machine can be constructed with over unity capability. This fact has been
shown repeatedly with the Adams machines, using small and weak magnets.
The inference also that Nikola Tesla might have required today's advanced
magnetic materials to achieve over unity results, is also totally wrong. The
only difference between using ordinary magnets like 'alnico' and, for
instance, 'samarium cobalt', is that you get greater energy output from the
stronger magnets by way of their ability to detect and amplify this energy on
a greater scale; and, therefore, upon utilizing the Adams pulsing system, you
can have a device using any ordinary magnets capable of not only 100%
efficiency, but also of being tuned into operating as a gate in detecting and
delivering gravitational energy.
As for the establishment's texts stating that "magnets do NO real work", the
establishment, for once, is correct. It is, however, interesting to note that
this is a very 'convenient' fact for the establishment to expound upon - there
could be an underlying inference here that magnets are useless for machines
designed to achieve beyond unity results.
Permanent magnets and their place in science today need to be more fully
understood."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Dr. Rolf Schaffranke
"Reference to an article written by Dr. Schaffranke in THE MANUAL OF FREE
ENERGY DEVICES AND SYSTEMS, VOLUME TWO, published by D.A. Kelly, in which on
page 7, paragraphs 7 and 12, Dr. Schaffranke erroneously maintains it is
NECESSARY to use super magnets to tap gravitational energy.
I found that my original 1970 open magnetic circuit motor generator is
superior to my 1976 closed magnetic circuit model in regard to the results of
obtaining and maintaining a correct harmonic vacuum oscillation and so tapping
gravitational energy during one half-cycle of the gravitational pulse wave.
People who make such claims regarding the use of super magnets, obviously have
little or no experience in the realms of rotary free-energy devices using
permanent magnets. Over twenty years ago, I proved that even tiny weak
magnets bought off the shelf and incorporated into my machines yielded
efficiency into the hundreds of per cent over unity.
A permanent magnet is an entity unto itself. It is no different in any way
whatsoever from its brothers made of different materials; it is still a
permanent magnet irrespective of its gauss rating.
These claims are tantamount to saying that you can get more than 2.2 volts out
of a lead acid cell simply by increasing its ampere hour rating, or
conversely, you use a ten horsepower motor to run a machine that only requires
one horsepower.
I reiterate - the sooner science rejects conventionalism, the better for
humankind.
If indeed magnets were doing a tremendous amount of work, they certainly would
not last long in any machine. There are secrets and mysteries surrounding
magnets and collapsing field energies, and only after exhaustive studies of
these two phenomena in practice, do these mysteries unravel themselves and
emerge in their glory, and, correctly applied through the use of the required
mathematics, pave the way to tapping gravitational energy in astronomical
quantity.
For high-power rotary machines, however, super magnets are the obvious choice,
for reasons of higher power capabilities, reduced weight and volume. When
installed in an 'Adams' machine, these super magnets enable the opening up of
clearances between rotor and stator without appreciable loss due to the high
overall efficiency of this machine.
If indeed it were possible to induce magnets to do a tremendous amount of
work, as claimed by the aforementioned people, then I claim that the magnets
must first have very substantial energy imparted to them to undertake the task
ahead. Secondly, when reaching this 'tremendous' state, they would start
heating up and continue to do so until they reach the point whereby their
magnetism would begin disintegrating, and continue to do so until the machine
would eventually come to a halt, unable to start again.
There are a lot of people out there striving for the ultimate in rotary
electrical machines. They all have my personal blessings for their
endeavours, but may I hasten to add for those who make such claims, that they
exhibit a lack of experience and knowledge of the capabilities of permanent
magnets in rotary electrical machines.
But don't be disappointed, readers, as I assure you that permanent magnets are
indeed the answer to free energy. Correctly adapted to a rotary machine they
are the 'gateway' to harnessing gravitational energy.
With the application of the 'Adams resonant pulse frequency equation' and the
'Cathie harmonic equations' combined with the 'Adams Pulsed EMG System',
incredible energies can be very easily and cleanly made available.
I wish to state to all readers at this particular stage, that I have only, in
the past year, made the decision to publish certain aspects from my twenty
years work in the field of free energy research.
There are no doubt many other researchers who, for various reasons such as
lack of finance, fear, suppression and very many other barriers, have not had
even a chance to be heard. It is to be hoped the day will soon arrive when
all can benefit from our work."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Adams Pulsed Electric Motor Generator - January 1993
"An explanation to readers on matters pertaining to hysteresis loss, eddy
current loss, magnetic drag. Also some advice regarding further information
required from enquiries received to date by interested parties :
I would first like to state that it has been made clear that this machine has
been proven to be capable of over-unity performance, plus the fact that it has
proven itself capable of returning energy to its supply source. So we now
come to the matters mentioned above.
If a machine is to run at unity or better, it must first 'overcome' those
problems found in the conventional machine, which, of course, are principally
those of magnetic drag, hysteresis loss and eddy currents, all of which waste
energy in heat and hence require a cooling fan - with its attendant losses as
well.
As explained previously, the Adams machine runs cool in comparison to the
conventional machine and does not, therefore, require a cooling fan. Now
these factors surely speak for themselves. It must also be borne in mind by
the reader that in the conventional AC or DC machine, the internal heat of
windings and stators reach boiling point within fifteen minutes. The Adams
machine does not have this problem.
Given thse salient factors, which in themselves are a starting point for those
of you who are forward-thinking, I feel I have provided sufficient hints,
information and guidance to enable those astute enough to realize the
potentiality of the principles given, to build a machine for themselves
according to their own leanings as well as along the lines of the Adams
machine.
Most of you know of the manual which has been published and distributed by
NEXUS Magazine. My purpose in compiling this manual is to give those
interested an insight into the principles of the mysteries of my machine, and
I expect those interested, patient and persevering enough to accept that they
must work out and work with these mysteries and to, like myself, to battle to
get there. Only then will true understanding and enlightenment reveal itself
and true reward, however slowly, be theirs.
Notwithstanding these statements however, I submit here a few further valuable
recommendations for readers, and as time progresses, and as time permits, some
further such tidbits of information will be drip-fed through NEXUS as a form
of encouragement to all concerned.
I would like to inform readers at this point in time that, because of the
steady flow of response I have had since publication in NEXUS, by enthusiasts,
interested parties and investors alike, it is no longer possible to address
enquiries of the nature of those above individually, other than on a
consultancy basis. Although I will continue to contribute certain articles to
NEXUS as long as I am able, and will continue to personally reply to all mail,
I ask readers to kindly understand that a good deal of my time is involved in
consultancy already on my advanced projects, so my free time is somewhat
limited. I encourage readers to keep their eyes on NEXUS as I intend to
remain as loyal to them as they are to me.
Here, then, are those few further recommendations to readers.
If contemplating the construction of a proving machine - note as follows :
1) Don't purchase expensive powerful 'neodymium' or 'samarium cobalt' magnets
without first having experience with cheap easy-to-get 'alnico' magnets,
for if you commence with powerful magnets you will find yourself facing
powerful problems. More information on this matter of 'powerful magnets'
will be found in the article referred to as "The Adams 1992-1993 Christmas
New Year breakthrough" (refer to NEXUS - VOLUME 2, NO.11 - see ADAMS1.ZIP
on KeelyNet) and in the article written by the inventor referred to as "On
Wilhelm Muller" (dated 1 February 1993). Using powerful magnets will not
prove anything beyond what alnico will do. However, given this, if you
feel you MUST choose powerful magnets, for whatever your reasons, take
heed -great care is required in the handling of them to preclude personal
injury.
2) For a proving machine do not use less than 10 ohms each for two stators at
180 degrees apart; recommend series mode for first attempt. Don't be
concerned about start windings initially and, remember, what can be
achieved MICROscopically can be achieved MACROscopically and so I strongly
suggest - walk before you run.
3) Should you experience any difficulty in designing and constructing the
tapered disc contactor (machining, etc.) then use electronic switching,
i.e. photo, Hall effect, or inductor effect, with switching current
transistor, etc. The machine, correctly constructed, should still deliver
a minimum 107% efficiency. The charging effect will, of course, be lost,
and the input current to supply the electronic switching will raise the
total input quite steeply. The point to be made here is that in using
electronic switching, in a larger machine, the degree of loss due to this
use of electronic switching is negligible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, for those who are seeking greater efficiency figures, it is advised
to stay with the tapered disc contactor method and build a small wattage unit,
i.e. 0.25 to 1 watt. This is the area of power rating within which you will
gain quicker and better results which, in turn, will provide the necessary
experience for designing and building a larger unit.
Once again the inventor cannot stress the importance enough, for those who
wish to construct a successful device, to start at the bottom rung and listen
to what the device is saying to you as you go along.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note for the Curious
I have received a lot of requests regarding an explanation accounting for such
low temperature operation on full load. This one fact alone is indisputable
evidence of a very high efficiency rating.
I have therefore decided to make up a set of drawings which will explain to
the reader the questions regarding hysteresis, eddy current and magnetic drag
losses, as well as temperature ratings, etc.
These drawings will be accompanied with written explanations concerning the
'how'and 'why' of certain factors.
These drawings and their accompanying information will be available directly
from the inventor at the address given below at a cost of NZ $20.00 including
postage.
Meanwhile, for further information on the 'Adams and Cathie' projects, you'll
find it all in your future issues of NEXUS."
Robert Adams
46 Landing Road
Whakatane, New Zealand
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard notes
The Adams machine was quite the topic of discussion at the April 1993 ISNE
conference in Denver. It was first broken to the public attention by NEXUS
magazine, published in Australia.
We have had contact with Duncan Roads, editor of NEXUS, for about two years
now and they have used several of our files as source material or verbatim
from the board.
NEXUS covers a broad range of topics and always has several interesting
articles that make it worth subscribing to. And Duncan also believes that
information should be as freely shared as possible, and so recommends that
folks copy and pass around information from NEXUS, just as KeelyNet, now in
its 4th year, has done from day one.
As to the ADAMS motor, I am a bit puzzled with the comments that
gravitational energy is somehow used in the machine. From my admittedly
limited understanding, it simply appears that he is using the back EMF to
give additional thrust and thus a much higher efficiency.
With the use of the back EMF, there would be little if any hysteresis from
the "collision" of the forward EMF with the back EMF and thus the reduction
in heating.
We at KeelyNet would greatly appreciate reports from anyone reading this
who might choose to build or otherwise experiment with the principle. You
may upload as a text file or send a photo copy to the Vanguard Sciences
address at the top of the document. Thanks....>>> Jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/adams3.asc
+77
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : ADAMS3.ASC | Online Date : 12/17/94 |
| Contributed by : Bob Aldrich | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The ADAMS files currently on KeelyNet consist of 3 .ASC files (ADAMS1, ADAMS2
and ADAMS3) and 9 .GIFs all bundled together as ADAMS1_3.ZIP and ADAMSGIF.ZIP
on KeelyNet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Msg # 4
Date: 12 Mar 94 20:56:00
From: David Galea
To: all
Subj: Adams Motor/Generator
____________________________________________________________________________
Hello all,
I am new to this echo area and I am not sure if anyone has discussed this
topic before.
I have obtained plans for constructing a motor/generator from a Mr. Robert
Adams in New Zealand and I have begun construction.
Seven people have since built this device in Australia and it seems to work
fine, but no-one can explain the effiency anomoly that occurs after about 15
minutes of running time. In the two that I have personally seen, the eff.
rating jumps from 85% (normal) then after about 15 mins goes to around 120%.
We have set up oscilloscopes, amp meters, volt meters, temp meters and can't
account for the increase.
We do not have access to a magnamonitor to measure the magnetic field on the
rotor, but we are still stumped.
Any ideas ? My intention is for it to be a Battery Charger.
David Galea
Melbourne Australia.
... OFFLINE 1.35 * Recycle! For us... and them...
--- Maximus 2.01wb
* Origin: Permaculture 1 BBS * Northcote_Aust * +61-3-482-2942 (3:632/376)
SEEN-BY: 102/2 138 355 435 741 752 756 760 851 1302 105/30 112/1 128/1
SEEN-BY: 132/888 147/7 170/400 203/23 206/1701 209/207 209 710 720
SEEN-BY: 270/101 290/627 345/31 396/1 640/75 3615/50
PATH: 632/376 711/431 401 712/515 105/42 50 3615/50 396/1 209/209
PATH: 102/2 752 756
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Note
There are some peculiar activities that have happened with regard to the
ADAMS motor. As you can see from the above email, these fellows claim to
know of 7 people who have successfully replicated the Adams motor.
In 1993, everyone was hot for it, wanting plans and such. Within a very
short period, there was a business arrangement made with Adams which we
heard was to produce a UNITY motor to be patented and sold in the U.K..
Sometime toward the end of 1993, the talk was that the ADAMS motor had not
proven out, that no one had successfully duplicated the effect or there was
some anomaly in the measurement method. A very bizarre turnaround if you
read the above email.
At the 1994 ISNE meeting, Bill McMurtry of New Zealand gave a presentation
in which he said flat out that the Adams motor did not work. We took Bill
to dinner with Tom Bearden and Ken McNeil, but did not have an opportunity
to speak with him in detail because he and Ken had some items to discuss in
private.
The collaboration of Adams with Bruce Cathie had increased the over unity
output to numbers that were so incredible as to warrant not publishing them.
I read something about it being on the order of 1:3000. At any rate, the
Adams motor is far from dead if there have been independent successes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/aether01.asc
+165
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : AETHER01.ASC | Online Date : 08/21/95 |
| Contributed by : Jerry W, Decker | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| WWW sites - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb & http://www.protree.com |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Aether Engineering - a practical approach
by Jerry W.Decker
One of the approaches that KeelyNet has taken in trying to understand vast
amounts of seemingly unrelated information has been that of correlation.
Another is to look for primary claims or observations which could be expressed
in other terms or using other concepts.
The term KeelyNet reflects a reliance on the principles and concepts
discovered by John W. Keely in the late 1800's. By no means is it to imply
Keely as our ONLY source of information or inspiration.
Another KeelyNet approach is the recognition that scientists, engineers,
academics and other degreed professionals are not the sole source of
inspiration or invention. To that end, we promote a simplified approach to
science based on natural processes and observations.
As a kind of primer, a file was generated early on called NEUTRAL1 which
expressed the 'basics' of this philosophy. These basics have been expanded to
include;
1) ideas about the aether
a) it is omnipresent
b) it varies in density
c) it can be translated from one form to another
d) it can be interferred with
e) it flows into, creates and sustains all mass and energy
f) it flows into a point which exists in all individualized structures
(mass aggregates such as a rock or a chair, molecules which make up
the aggregate, atoms which make up the molecule, quarks which make
up the atom, etc.)
g) it is the aether flow which produces gravity and its sister forces
of electricity and magnetism
h) it oscillates at a very high frequency and can be interferred with
to produce energy, matter and phenomena
i) a matrix can be generated to 'manifest' specific structures in
matter based on E=MC^ yet not requiring high energy 'atomic
processes'
2) frequency and wavelength
a) everything oscillates based on its physical dimensions
b) oscillation produces waves which can be interferred with in a
constructive or destructive manner
c) energy can be transferred via resonance from or to an oscillating
structure or medium
d) a signature or matrix of frequencies can be derived from any mass
or energy structure
e) a signature can be represented in two dimensions as a mandala using
a vibrating (Chladni) waveplate
f) a signature can be projected into three dimensions by use of an
energized mandala
g) resonance can be used to transfer matter or energy between points,
dimensions or other quantum realities
3) gravity
a) is NOT an attractive force
b) IS a repelling force, most easily detectable between celestial
bodies
c) can be interferred with to produce
1) other forms of energy
2) loss of weight
3) negation of weight
4) positive thrust
5) a reduced aging zone for matter or life
d) weight is simply the result of being caught in the flow of aether
towards the center of a larger mass
The idea that 'weight' can be reduced by redirecting the flow of gravity is a
radical one, yet there are ample indications that it can be redirected and has
been done. We see it in the large, heavy stones used to build the pyramids.
We see it in StoneHenge, Easter Island, the stela in Ethiopia and other
megalithic constructions.
In modern times, the Farrow device, the Nieper ring and Edward Leedskalnins'
Coral Castle in Homestead, Florida. Leedskalnin claimed he had figured out
how the Egyptians constructed the pyramids and proved his claims by
duplicating the moving of large stones, single-handed.
There are also the reports of flying machines such as Keely's airship,
demonstrated to the US War Department in 1896, John Searl's flying disk and
more recently the Hummel disk in Canada. Not to mention Victor Schauberger
and the Nazi experiments which culminated in the Kugelblitz flying machine.
Then we have the Airship sightings in the 1800's, in the United States and
other countries, as well as reports of 'flying men' and 'bat-men' who flew
through the air as if swimming. Charles Fort also collected some reports on
these types of sightings of flying men and machines well before the advent of
the Wright brothers.
All this leads us to believe that there are people who are aware that gravity
CAN be controlled to a degree sufficient to reduce the weight of a given mass.
Over the last few years, several other pieces of information have been added
to the database that give us inspiration for experiments. The essential
information comes from;
1) the principle of inertial drive to produce a unidirectional thrust
a) Cook and Thornsen have developed similar systems to produce such a
thrust
b) the devices generate a cycloidal motion to produce this thrust
c) Chernetskii uses an electronic version of this technique to
generate power from a plasma
d) the reaction occurs not against the medium (air, earth, water,
etc.) but against the mass of the object itself
2) the 'ZPE as Inertia' paper by Haische, Puthoff and Rueda
a) describes how the ambient aether/ZPE is the source and cause of
inertia
b) by properly interferring with this flow, inertia could be avoided
3) the Aspden Effect
a) a spinning mass was brought to a specific RPM several times and the
energy required was always the same, 300 joules
b) when the mass was slowed ALMOST to a stop, then brought back up to
the specified RPM (3250), it only required 30 joules of energy
c) the rotating mass was not reported to have been weighed in this
preliminary test
These three essential pieces of information, derived from modern ideas and
experiments show us that aether/ZPE flows can be interacted with in such a way
as to be useful in modern day life.
The aether, being suffused into mass, can be dissociated or decoupled to
various degrees, leading to phenomena such as weight and/or inertial loss.
Did the ancients who built the pyramids and other such structures have access
to hidden technological advanced devices. Apparently not, since Leedskalnin
did not, yet he duplicated many of their feats in our time, all the while
claiming that he had re-discovered how the Egyptians had built the pyramids.
Once you reduce the 'weight' of a mass, you could move a large stone around
like a piece of styrofoam, or swim through the air, jump over a building, etc.
All indications point to an understanding of basic phenomena which we
currently overlook. This includes the use of sound or other energies,
properly introduced into mass, to interfere with the aether flow.
Using the concepts outlined above, KeelyNet and some of its associates feel we
could produce a gravity reduction experiment that anyone could duplicate and
this should be possible within a year or less. It would take some funding to
provide the time, material, equipment and backing to generate and document the
effort.
This file is being generated not for the express purpose of seeking funding,
but to offer everyone access to our observations as to the most likely
approach to achieve a practical means of gravity reduction. Based on the
information that comes into KeelyNet, it appears the concepts are out there,
but little is being done in the way of practical research.
It does not matter WHO rediscovers how to reduce the flow of gravity, all that
matters is that it is FREELY SHARED with the world.
The intent is to put the pieces in front of everyone so they will get as
excited as many of us are when realizing just HOW CLOSE we are to a world
where gravity is controllable.
Jerry W. Decker
Sysop/KeelyNet
August 21, 1995
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/aether02.asc
+128
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : AETHER02.ASC | Online Date : 09/09/95 |
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following file is from an InterNet USENET response in the alt.sci.physics.
new-theories section. It provides an interesting exchange on the properties
of the aether as being a solid mass yet laced with interstices where rhombic
dodecahedrons, tetrahedrons and other geometries connect.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: rt@iprolink.co.nz (Ray Tomes)
Subject: Re: The Farce of Physics
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 1995 11:22:17 GMT
genegdman@aol.com (GeneGdman) wrote:
>rt@iprolink.co.nz (Ray Tomes)wrote:
>>Gene, I agree with you that an ether must have mechanical and/or
>>kinematic properties. However these properties are not the normal
>>mechanical and kinematic properties of other objects. By this I mean
>>that if the ether was made of little particles, then they would have
>>velocity and a sort of temperature (variance in velocities) but these
>>properties would not correspond directly to any observed temperature.
>>In fact, in such a case, the ether temperature would very likely be low
>>where our observed temperatures are high.
>Ray, as you probably already know, my own concept of the ether is that it
>is continuous except for discontinuities at the center of protons (and the
>interior of black holes). I have had difficulty getting a number of
>people to form the concept of an ether that has no subdivisions. No
>matter how many times I try to explain what continuous means, they keep
>insisting my ether must be composed of particles. It seems that the ether
>you describe above is not a space subdivided into particles, but an
>otherwise empty space that contains a few particles per unit volume as
>would a gas.
Gene, although at one time I did think that a particle model would work
for the ether, I now agree with you that a continuous solid ether is the
preferred model. My "If the ether was particles" was only to show that
this would clearly have kinematic properties.
>The discussions of "background radiation" have caused me to think a lot
>more about the possibility that the ether may be subdivided. I still do
>not think so, but even if it is, I can't believe the subdivisions are not
>contiguous. That there are interstices. If these contiguous subdivisions
>were elastic rather than rigid, then all of the subdivisions would not
>have to be simultaneously in the exactly the same state of motion. This
>kind of ether would behave exactly like a continuous elastic solid but I
>can't figure out what shape the subdivisions could be. It seems likely
>they would be identical, but if so, cubes or tetrahedrons are the only
>regular shapes I can think of that will even form a solid with no
>interstices.
Rhombic Dodecahedrons can pack space and are the nearest to spheres.
For this reason I believe that standing waves which are nearly
spherical can pack in that way also. Buckminster Fuller worked
with tetrahedrons but his writing is very difficult to understand.
>The only reason I can think of for subdividing is that it
>may facilitate the mathematical treatment. It hasn't for me, but thinking
>about it has made me understand a lot more about mathematics than I did as
>a student.
>I wonder what you meant by the statement that our observed temperatures
>are high. How are you defining heat? How do other people define it?
>What do you mean by the word temperature? What do others mean? How are
>we doing the observing?
Temperature is simply a measurement of the variance of particle
velocities in a small region. Except for em waves (see below).
>What do you suppose the folks that say there is a "background microwave
>radiation" mean by the word radiation? What do they use for a detector?
>Is it something that has a flat bandwidth over the microwave spectrum only
>and cuts off sharply above and below?
The CMBR is electromagnetic waves mainly in the 1mm to 1cm range.
The power in the spectrum has now been accurately determined over a
wide range (it was previously limited by the earth's atmosphere).
I don't know how the detectors work.
>Does it detect waves that are not
>in motion with respect to it? If so, how does it do this? Or is it
>something that integrates every bit of "electromagnetic" (quote marks
>because this term vanishes in my theory) radiation from every source in
>the universe, that impinges on some form of detector? Even if it was
>restricted to the infrared spectrum, if temperature is in some way
>proportional to this radiation, I would expect the temperature to be very
>high.
The motion of the source is not the significant factor. The wavelength
in our moving frame of reference is. According to the measurements of
the imbalance in frequencies of the CMBR in different directions, we are
doing 370 km/s relative to it. The temperature of the CMBR is really
a measure of the average wavelength, but also defines the wavelength
distribution as it is a blackbody radiation. It is low (<3K) because
it is the distribution that would result if the radiation was in thermal
equilibrium with matter at the same temperature.
>When the word radiation used in electronics, to me it has always meant a
>wave propagating at the speed of light. Is their background microwave
>radiation stationary in space? Or is it new dispersive radiation being
>continuously generated everywhere that should exhibit interference
>patterns?
Yes, at the speed of light. It is standard EM waves.
It cannot exhibit interference patterns because it is not coherent and
has a uniform distribution of frequencies.
>Frankly I think the confusion level introduced by thermodynamics and by
>Einstein, Bohr and Heisenberg has reached the point that everyone is just
>grasping at straws. To think clearly about it at all, you have to ignore
>everyone else's conclusions and just use the results of experiments that
>do not depend on prior conclusions. I wish they would just tell me what
>they actually did and leave all the concluding to me.
I think that this argument is true of many QM experiments, but not of
the CMBR measurements. I would certainly like to see the raw data of
the Bell's inequality measurements to test David Elm's theory.
Ray Tomes <rt@iprolink.co.nz>
http://www.vive.com/connect/universe/rt-home.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/aethrtap.asc
+132
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
___________________________________________________________________________
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| Sysop : Jerry W. Decker | Voice : (214) 324-8741 |
| Co-Sysop : Ronald Barker | Voice : (214) 242-9346 |
| File Name : AETHRTAP.ASC | Online Date : 05/22/94 |
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 1031 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75149 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Colorado Trip and some of what we learned
At the 1994 ISNE conference in Denver, we met some interesting people and
collected some "anecdotal" stories that you guys would like to know about.
So here is a short synopsis of what appears to be a way to tap energy
directly from the Aether. The correlations are mine.
There have been experiments involving the dropping of capacitors and
finding that a voltage appears across the terminals. The contention is
that aether flows into the planetary neutral centre and in its flow can be
intercepted and "translated" (like white light through a prism) into lower
forces (magnetism, electricity, heat, mass, etc..see NEUTRAL1 on KeelyNet).
A dielectric appears to intercept and translate this flow into electrical
energy. It could also simply be the collection of electrostatic energy
from the air, but it's no fun if we can't play with the more far-out
aspects. (spook it up a bit, eh?)
Some suspect a piezoelectric effect from the shock of the capacitor against
the floor and I don't know if those capacitors were ever dropped onto a
soft surface.
Norman Wootan says he has read where falling masses seem to slow down
around 18" above the surface of the earth. Don Kelly's experiments with
the gravity drop tests don't currently test this 18" hypothesis but it does
seem to correlate and thus needs to be checked out.
The reason I am bringing all this up is because of a diagram shown to Norm
and I by my old friend, Vic Hansen. We were up very late one night and met
Vic in the hall where we talked for a bit. He showed us a diagram of this
very interesting idea that he says would allow one to pull energy from
either the earth or aether.
It required the use of a one mile wire, laid out in a straight line. I
asked him if it could be wound up and he says he does not think it will
work if NOT stretched out.
So, you take this wire, support it from the ground by non-conducting 18"
high standoffs and stretch it over the one mile test area.
On one end you put an AC power source, with the ground wire connected to
Earth ground, and the high side connected to the wire.
On the opposite end, you tie in a string of lamps. One side of the lamps
are tied to the one mile hot wire, the other side is tied to an earth
ground connection.
Vic says you stay at the AC power source side of the wire while watching
the lamps with a pair of binoculars. When you switch in the AC power
source, the lights will all light up.
Now comes the weird part. If you very rapidly transfer the one mile wire
Page 1
connection FROM the AC source DIRECTLY to the earth ground, the LIGHTS WILL
STAY ON! Or so Vic tells us.
I am told there is a patent on this and seem to remember having seen one
like it somewhere before. It is interesting to note that Thomas Henry
Moray's Radiant Energy Receiver also REQUIRED the use of long wire
antennas. The 18" height is a curious requirement unless there is
something really odd at this level above surface.
While taking an elevator down to the lobby, we ran into a fellow who was
also building a type of free energy collection device. He says he will
send us plans with further details but I'll tell you what he told us.
You make a box 30" wide by 15" tall by 15" wide. Layer it with spun steel
scour pads that are stretched out as a layer. On top of that layer you
place a non-conductor, he said to use thin STYROFOAM sheets. You build
multiple layers of this until the box is full.
Two copper probes are then inserted into each side of the box, from the top
down to the center and running against the outside edges. This fellows'
diagram shows one probe coming in from the upper left ending at the bottom
center of the box.
The other probe enters from the upper right and ends at the bottom center
of the box. Note that both probes stay up against the outside edges and do
not touch. I think that allows for the flow of energy across the steel
mesh.
A wet ground is then connected to the box probe on one side.
The other probe is connected in series with a transformer (for removing the
excess energy) that is again in series with a choke having 17 turns of wire
and then passes into a dry earth ground.
Our informant says this thing is supposed to produce around 5000 volts at
10Amps. So, if you choose to try this, be very careful.
It appears to work as a giant capacitor or leyden jar. I have no idea if
it works at all or if so, how long it takes to "charge". The use of the
transformer is peculiar because it indicates either a pulsing effect or AC
itself.
Well, you've got the descriptions as told to us, so get after it and let us
know what you find.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
KeelyNet (214) 324-3501 is a FREE Alternative Sciences BBS
Your file contributions and financial support are much appreciated!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/airmotor.asc
+373
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,373 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : AIRMOTOR.ASC | Online Date : 10/27/95 |
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following is from a bad photocopy I picked up several years ago. I was
reminded of it when Peter Lindemans excellent article "Tesla's Self-Acting
Engine" was published in the Third Quarter 1995 Borderlands Journal.
You can contact them on InterNet email at bsrf@northcoast.com or call the
Borderlands BBS at (707) 825-7739 or subscribe for one year at $25 from
Borderlands, PO BOX 220, Bayside, CA 95524 USA. Voice (707) 825-7733, FAX
(707) 824-7779. Tell Michael you heard about them from KeelyNet and they'll
treat you right!............................<g>...................>>> Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From Consumers Guide (I don't have the date)
Inventor refuses billion dollar offer.
Auto Runs on Air!
by Gilbert Lawrence
"....Actually, they offered me over a billion dollars - but I was afraid the
big three would just buy it up and never have any intentions of releasing it
to the consumer!" - Lee Rogers, Inventor
The following feature, to many American Consumers, may seem difficult to
believe. It none the less is true! This is not just a story of one man's
desire to overcome the suppression of massive odds against himself, but,
entwined within his destiny and within his hands he may hold the future
destiny of America and the free world. You may never need ask again,
"Whatever happened to good old American ingenuity? Where are the modern
Graham Bells, the Wright Brotheres, Henry Fords and the likes?"
No doubt, we have all heard the expression, "Don't look a gift horse in the
mouth." But, who among us could look a billion dollar plus offer in the face
and say, NO! Well, it may sound like a good plot for a television series (we
all remember "The Millionaire"), but it's no fiction, it happens to be the
truth. "The Big Three," apparently pooled their automotive fortunes and
efforts to the tune of over one billion dollars! All they wanted in return
were the absolute patent rights owned and already registered to Lee Rogers,
for an automobile that literally runs on air.
Rogers, a forty-one year old residential contractor, from Iona, Florida had
one underlying fear. He had a near obsessive concern that the automotive
industry might merely 'shelve' his revolutionary invention and keep it off the
market. Rogers might well be right, if all indications prove correct! His
idea to operate any regular gas designed engine on compressed air could cut
America's massive dependence upon foreign oil. Because, as Lee Rogers says,
"It's probably the closest thing to a perpetual motion machine that may ever
be invented."
News of Lee Rogers revolutionary design, reached Consumers Guide Editors and
immediately we went to work to separate fact from rumor. As I quickly found
out, this wasn't an easy task. For some reason, there almost seemed to be a
"media black-out," when it came to acquiring information on this potential
block-busting invention.
How could it be, I asked myself, if in fact, as Lee Rogers had stated, his
invention was probably the closest thing ever to a perpetual motion machine,
that no one, including AP, UPI, NBC, CBS and ABC had not grabbed up this
little gem and really ran the distance.
For whatever their fears or reservations the balance of the media seemingly
held back, and given the initiative of time, the Guide continued to forge
ahead to expose the inventive genius - or fraud - of Lee Rogers.
As the days grew into several weeks, bit by bit, piece by piece, the Rogers
story started coming together. Many unanswered questions and doubts were
investigated and the solutions to the skeptics questions were answered with
hard facts.
Example : Why did Dr. Larry Bagnall, noted University of Florida
Agricultureal Engineer, criticize Rogers inventions, saying, "Rogers might
just as well use a horse to turn a windmill!" Further, Bagnall stated, "I
would roughly estimate that it would take twice as much energy to FILL the
tanks and COMPRESS the air as the engine could EVER produce. After all,"
Bagnall continued, "Rogers will have to use more fuel to compress the tanks of
air than the auto normally would use!"
Rogers, not one to be at a loss for words, countered Bagnall's attack with a
chuckle, "the compressor will be continually fueled simply by the power from
the engine itself."
As Rogers later stated in an exclusive Consumers Guide interview, "I work on
one problem at a time. First, they told me it was impossible to run an auto
engine on just plain 'pure' simple air and I said, "Why?"
"After all," as Lee Rogers continued, "All gasoline does is create a 'HOT'
explosion driving the pistons up and down, and the only reason it's a HOT
explosion is because it's IGNITED. So, I got to thinking, no reason why the
air HAS to be HOT! Why not just regular cool everyday air like you and I
breathe?"
"Sounds good," everyone would say, "but it'll NEVER work!" "Well, I MADE it
work! I proved it! I not only STARTED it, and IDLED it (for MANY, MANY
hours), but I took 'em for a drive in it. - Now let 'em tell me it CAN'T
work!"
State Rep. Paul Nuckolls, (R) Fort Myers, who just happens to be on the House
Agricultural Committee, sees the Rogers invention as a potential revolutionary
breakthrough for the farming industry. Without the high cost of fuel, that
the farmers are presently faced with, food prices could be slashed.
Rep. Nuckolls personal aid, Jim Siford, stated to the Guide, "I remember the
day we all went down to Lee's for a look. A whole group of us were there. We
had heard all types of rumors, and Mr. Rogers walked out to his garage with us
explaining, 'it just simply RUNS ON AIR.' One gent who was there with us, who
I dare not name, said, 'if that thing even STARTS, I'll consider it a
miracle!'
"Well, Mr. Rogers opens up the garage door and there sits a regular looking
1977 Dodge station wagon. After showing us the modifications, Mr. Rogers hops
in and not only starts her up, he backs down his driveway and waves to us, as
he drives off down the street. You could have knocked us all over with a
feather!" Siford concluded.
(Editors Note : Accompanying this article is the Guide exclusive interview
with Lee Rogers.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air-Powered auto is a Reality!
by Jerry Keefe
Lee Rogers is a resident of Iona, Florida, a small residential area outside
Fort Myers. He believes he's invented a car that runs on compressed air; no
fuel, no combustion, just the power of air trying TO FREE ITSELF from the
cylinders of a V-8 engine.
Rogers' idea to run an automobile on compressed air was sparked by the energy
crunch two years ago. This idea has been fueled by his technical progress on
the engine, and his desire to change the nature of the auto industry, thus
freeing the consumer of spiraling gasoline costs and cut America's umbilical
cord with the energy-rich Arab nations.
Lee began by tinkering with his 1977 Dodge Aspen station wagon. He removed
all the gasoline components from his engine, including the carburetor, spark
plugs, gas tank, fuel pump and exhaust system.
The old Dodge was originally fueled by pressurized air tanks that Rogers had
purchased. He has since designed an air compressor that provides a CONTINUOUS
supply of air to the engine. A conversion kit, that he developed, attaches to
the engine block, pumping pressurized air into the cylinder - and it works!
"Simply, it just runs on air instead of gas," the 41-year old former home
builder says of his first invention, "Instead of gas, it just has air going in
to DRIVE the pistons up and down. It's so damn simple nobody believes it."
That includes Jimmy Carter, the Department of Energy, Ralph Nader and the
major US car manufacturers, all of whom Rogers has contacted with little or no
response.
Rogers contacted the major auto companies last year and tried to interest them
in his idea. But, they apparently wrote him off as a nut and ignored his
request to come and SEE his perpetual motion machine.
Apparently the Big Three believe him NOW. After a great deal of publicity and
documented facts, they have pooled their bargaining efforts and offered him
"over a billion dollars" for his patent.
"Chrysler and General Motors asked me to send it to them, but they didn't
believe it could turn it (the engine) over," Rogers says with amusement.
"Hell, I can let it IDLE eight hours a day OR MORE, take it on a test run and
reach speeds UP TO 80 miles per hour. And when you look at the engine, it has
a nice frosty cool appearance to it and is cold to the touch."
"There's a couple little tricks to my invnention that I haven't told nobody.
My wife doesn't even know about em'. Like I told Chrysler, if you had this
idea you could be No. 1 instead of being on the brink of bankruptcy. They
said, "Well, send it to us. We don't expect it to run.' But they want me to
practically sign the patent over to them."
And Rogers has his engine patented to the hilt. He has about $7,000 of his
own money in his own invention so far, he says.
Mr. Rogers fears that if the big auto companies did buy his creation, they
might hold the production of a car that runs for years with no internal
combustion or tune-ups.
"And, if they did make this car, where is the average consumer going to get
the $16,000 or $20,000 to buy one?" Rogers asks.
Lee Rogers plans to build a "converter kit," that will adapt to any American
built auto, mass produce them and sell them outright. He feels that if he
builds and sells them on his own he can protect his patent, help out the
consumer, save his country from the Arab oil squeeze and make a comfortable
sum of money to live on.
He touts his invention as one solution to smog and the energy crisis, and says
that when it is completed, it will run as fast as gasoline-powered engines and
revolutionize the industry.
"Ford Motors told me the engine would never run on air. They said it's
DESIGNED to run on combustion only, created by a fuel," Rogers adds, "nobody
believed it would work because they said it would work they would have done it
a long time ago!"
In the process of designing and building his 'perpetual-motion' machine, Lee
Rogers had to have every part made at various machine shops. Many times the
various parts had to be modified, redesigned or completely remade.
"My invention would turn inflation clear around. If enough American people
KNEW about it, they're going to PUSH for it. The auto companies could have
created this ten years ago. Frank Kelly, my neighbor, who has assisted me in
the assembly of the engine, and I can't change the country by ourselves. We
need HELP from EVERYONE to put pressure on the auto industry to give my engine
a chance.
Rogers' '77 Dodge is currently running at 96% HP efficiency compared to only
26% for gas powered vehicles.
Lee Rogers air-powered conversion kit (when manufactured), could be adapted to
any American-made auto and would sell for about $1,000. The kit could be
installed by your local mechanic at a nearby gas station. The car keeps its
battery to power the lights, accessories and to start up the air compressor.
Now, assuming you have bought the conversion kit, had it installed, you are
now ready for your initial test run. But, first you must spend $14 for a tank
of NITROGEN to CHARGE all FOUR AIR TANKS that are mounted where the gas tank
USED TO BE. You have the MAIN tank, and the other THREE are RESERVES.
The compressor is fueled simply by power from the engine AS THE ENGINE RUNS,
it's constantly REBUILDING its own air supply.
As one tank EMPTIES, another is being FILLED....and so on. When the charge
gets to 500 PSI, the auto is ready for the highway.
The nitrogen is a one time purchase. It also cleans, blows out all oil and
gas residue, cleaning the valves, the engine and everything else right out the
the exhaust.
Now, step into the car, turn on the key, give it some AIR (step on the former
GAS pedal) and away you go.
The whole concept of the perpetual-motion machine is based loosely on the same
theory of an AIR-GUN. The former gas pedal acts like a TRIGGER and gives you
VARIOUS SPEEDS, when you press down on it.
CURRENT PROBLEM
What stands between Lee Rogers marketing the convertor kits now or at some
time in the near future, is a slight problem he hopes to soon solve. At low
speeds, the auto uses the air pressure up in about 20 minutes.
"The engine doesn't run FAST ENOUGH at 5 to 15 mph to rebuild the air supply.
The air pressure has to reach about 2,000 RPM's to remake its own supply."
Lee chuckles and adds, "But it's merely a matter of gearing and some slight
changes. I'm very close to solving the problem. Very close," he adds and
grins.
And grin he should. Lee is on the verge of creating complete havoc in the
automotive world that for years has been dependent on the oil and gas
companies. And should his design work, the hiss of his air exhausts sweeping
across the nation will be topped only by the screaming and yelling of the
money hungry oil and gas magnates pulling their hair out.
MODERN DAY HERO
In this day and age when heroes are a rarity, Lee Rogers is certainly destined
to be a cult hero. The 41-year old building contractor is gaining a cult
following with engineers, mechanics and farmers who call day and night and
even stop by his house, the location of which Rogers is trying to keep "Top
Secret."
The usually calm, soft-spoken man sometimes breaks into a hearty laugh when he
recalls what some people have gone through to beg a glimpse of the air-powered
engine or just to shake the inventor's hand. A farmer flew in from Wisconsin
and wanted to buy his conversion kits for his tractors, when he arrived he
still had on his bib overalls.
An older couple named Rogers drove down from North Carolina simply to
congratulate another Rogers. And on and on it goes, phone calls, visitors,
TV, radio and newspaper reporters...all hoping to catch a glimpse of the Dodge
running on air. All the attention has built up to the point where Rogers is
finding a little privacy hard to come by.
He has an unlisted phone number, and for some, the journey to see the
perpetual-motion machine ends in disappointment. Lee Rogers attorney has
insisted that all viewing by unknowns be halted and that his "secret" be
guarded and kept under lock and key.
Years from now, we may be breathing clean air as we sit on our porch in a
rocking chair....telling our grandchildren about the legend of Lee Rogers and
how he slew the gianst of the auto industry with his creation of a perpetual
motion machine that revolutionized the auto industry and just possibly saved
mankind from walking the face of the earth with a gas mask and a tank of
oxygen strapped to his back to breathe with.
Note : In our conversation with Mr. Rogers he has expressed a concern for the
preservation of his privacy, in order that he may maintain some
semblance of normal life. Thus, in accordance with Mr. Rogers wishes,
Consumers Guide will NOT publish any DIRECT contact information.
Should you desire to correspond with Mr. Rogers, please write to:
Lee Rogers
c/o Consumers Guide
PO BOX 2700
Toledo, Ohio 43606
The guide will forward all correspondence to Mr. Rogers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vanguard Notes
You might want to also study the file BOESE, there is a text file and a .GIF
showing an engine which runs on nitrogen. The claim is liquid nitrogen, when
expanded to its gaseous state, expands by 960 times its volume. That
translates to pressure which drives an air motor to run the vehicle.
The following is excerpted from BOESE.ASC on Keelynet:
The engine uses a "turbo-expander" which functions as a heat exchanger. It
allows the liquid nitrogen a means of rapid expansion from heating due to
ambient temperatures of >30 degrees F. The "turbo-expander" is basically
a long hollow copper pipe that is either spiralled or folded in such a way
as to give the greatest surface exposure.
As the liquid nitrogen passes through this expansion tubing, the ambient
heat will cause the liquid to change to a gas through a phase change.
Liquid nitrogen expands by 980 times its volume when changing from a liquid
to a gas. Expansion means pressure which translates to power.
1 gallon = 231 cubic inches
Expansion of one gallon of Liquid Nitrogen into Nitrogen Gas
980 X 231 = 226,380 cubic inches
Once the liquid has expanded by 980 times its volume, it is fed into an
off-the-shelf AIR MOTOR. An air motor is kind of like a paddle wheel on an
old style riverboat. As compressed air is blown against the paddles, a
shaft is spun which drives whatever is attached, in this case, the
transmission of a vehicle. Boese said that only a slight modification to
the air motor was necessary to make the it run perfectly with the expanded
and very cool nitrogen gas.
There is another paper on a fellow in Costa Rica or Puerto Rico who also has
an air engine. When I find that info, I will post it also, though as I
recall, it doesn't give the same quality of information which Mr. Rogers does
in his interview.
One other point that is of interest and which correlates with this file, a
story told by John Searl to Rueben Joswiak when several of us went to the 94'
Tesla Symposium in Colorado Springs. John told Rueben that an inventor in
England had discovered a way to use a small quantity of gasoline in an engine
evacuted of air, for years without 'consuming' the gasoline.
As Rueben recounted it, the gasoline was sprayed as a fine mist into the
combustion chamber, then subjected to a 30,000 volt spark. This would make
the gasoline mist violently separate, causing the piston to be pushed away.
The gas would then be collected and recombined to be reinjected into the
chamber again and again. John said the inventor had been put under a secrecy
order and eventually died in a mysterious fashion.
We found this an intriguing idea at the time because if the gasoline had not
been consumed by the presence of oxygen and other gases, then what would cause
it to burn? So what would prevent it being reused as claimed? If Rogers
machine works as he claims, despite the disbelief of many, then this might
also work.
One final correlation which fit the air engine are with the mixing of outside
air with a Brown's gas consisting of hydrogen and oxygen as produced from
direct hydrolysis. This does not significantly affect the explosion of the
mixture according to Garrett (GARRETT1.ZIP) and resolves a couple of problems
associated with the burning of hydrogen. Recent experiments by Mike Randall
with a homemade Browns Gas generator confirm some of the unusual properties of
the gas when burned or combusted in an engine.
If you choose to experiment in this area or have papers or other information
which might add to the KeelyNet database, we would definitely appreciate
you sharing such information with us here at KeelyNet...thanks!....>>> Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/airpow.asc
+132
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
___________________________________________________________________________
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| Sysop : Jerry W. Decker | Voice : (214) 324-8741 |
| File Name : AIRPOW.ASC | Online Date : 05/22/94 |
| Contributed by : Richard Blakely | Dir Category : ENERGY |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scientists know that air molecules move about randomly at about 500 m/s,
which is faster than the speed of sound, even in sub-zero weather. Because
air molecules have so much energy, free power can be obtained from the
atmosphere.
I have written a 22 page report which shows how free power can be obtained
from the random motion of air molecules. The technical report contains
many equations and some drawings. If you have any questions, or if you
want to receive a copy of the report, send me a message [74213,2646]. The
rest of this file is a copy of the report's introduction:
Usually power is obtained by burning fossil fuels or by using
hydroelectricity, or from a nuclear power plant. But there are many other
sources of power; for example, wind power and solar power. This report
describes a new source of power: thermal-gradient power. A thermal
gradient occurs naturally in the earth's atmosphere.
Although it is easy for people on the ground to assume that the atmosphere
is isothermal, the lower atmosphere is actually warm at the bottom and cold
at the top. Aircraft pilots are familiar with the variation of temperature
with altitude because they must deal with low air temperatures at high
altitudes. Gravity causes the thermal gradient in the atmosphere because
air molecules lose energy as they move higher in the atmosphere. This
report presents a theory to explain how and why a thermal gradient occurs
in the atmosphere.
Because a thermal gradient can occur in a gas which is in a rotating
vessel, this report also presents a theory to explain how centrifugal force
can cause a thermal gradient. Thermal-gradient power can, in theory, be
obtained from the atmosphere by using heat from air which is near the
ground. A heat engine can use that heat to generate power, and then it can
exhaust its waste heat into the cold air which exists at high altitudes.
Power generation causes a reduction in the average temperature of the
atmosphere, but the atmospheric thermal gradient is not destroyed by
harnessing it to produce power; the thermal gradient is continuously
restored by the random motions of air molecules. Therefore, utilization
of the thermal gradient is actually a utilization of atmospheric thermal
energy.
Since the sun keeps the atmosphere at a constant average temperature,
thermal-gradient power is a renewable resource. The atmospheric thermal
gradient violates the second law of thermodynamics because the random
motions of air molecules can maintain it without sunlight. Because the
atmospheric thermal gradient is real, the second law must be flawed.
Exposing that flaw is a main objective of this report because, until now,
scientists have been unable to find a flaw in the second law. By studying
the atmosphere we can understand exactly how and why the second law of
thermodynamics is flawed.
Page 1
FROM: Richard Blakely, 74213,2646
TO: Craig L. Shields Jr, 71324,1630
DATE: 4/29/94 1:29 AM
Re: Free Energy from Air
Hello Craig:
I forgot to put my name in the file. The simplist way to get the rest
of the report is by mail. The report contains equations and drawings so it
is best to mail it to you.
Currently I am charging $15 to cover the cost of postage ($2.16) and
photocopying and the costs of writing the report. If you mail me $15 U.S.
cash or check or money order then I will mail you the technical report.
The address you should send the $15 to: FREE POWER
12137-96 St.,
Edmonton, Alberta T0G-0P0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
KeelyNet (214) 324-3501 is a FREE Alternative Sciences BBS
Your file contributions and financial support are much appreciated!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/airspike.asc
+39
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : AIRSPIKE.ASC | Online Date : 05/22/95 |
| Contributed by : Bruce Welsh | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| WWW sites - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb & http://www.protree.com |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
From the May 22, 1995 Business Week.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Beams Could Really Cut your Commute
It looks more like a flying saucer than a sleek spaceship. It will be powered
by silent microwave beams instead of roaring rockets. And its airframe is
essentially a helium-filled dirigible. Despite these unconventional features,
the aero-space craft being developed at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute isn't
mere science fiction.
Last Month, Rensselaer's "air spike" propulsion system passed a Mach 10 wind-
tunnel test with flying colors. That's only half the speed needed to get into
space, but Leik N. Myrabo, the RPI associate professor of mechanical
engineering who heads the research team, is confident the principle is valid
for craft that could ferry tourists to the moon in six hours - or business
travelers from New York to Singapore in 45 minutes.
The air-spike system works by funneling microwave energy to a spikelike
antenna. Its tip generates shock waves that blast away the air in front of
the saucer, creating lift to suck the airframe forward. But the real action
comes when the shock waves collapse back around the rim of the saucer,
forceing hypersonic air into the intakes of a special jet engine.
No heavy fuel is carried because the jet burns electricity - beamed in as
microwaves from high-power transmitters on the ground OR IN SPACE. If the
wind tunnel results at RPI attract more funding, says Myrabo, 21st century
travelers may literally ride on energy-beam highways in the sky.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Bruce points out, "How can this work in space with NO AIR?"....>>> Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/alex.asc
+198
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 22, 1992
ALEX.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Ray Berry.
The following is through a "channel", a discarnate entity speaking
through a human agent. The validity of the information is at this
time unproven to the best of our knowledge, but we present it as it
was shared with us, in the hopes it might help jar loose one of
those jigsaw puzzle pieces that help further our understanding.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESENT-DAY ELECTRICAL GENERATION & ITS EFFECT ON THE EARTH
by Alexander
One thing we want to mention is the way you currently generate
and transmit electricity and its effect on the weather. The
earth has an immune system, as a living organism, in the sense
that it strives to maintain balance just as your body strives to
maintain balance in all of its systems.
The earth has to balance energy from two directions: one, from
the cosmos, the sun being the principal energy, but there's all
sorts of cosmic radiation. The second is energy arising from
the earth; there are vibrational patterns, for instance in Southern
California, which are highly unstable, and there are patterns in
other areas of the earth that are sturdier.
Weather - wind and precipitation - is the earth attempting to
balance these combined energies and to diffuse them in a way that
causes the least damage. A single bolt of lightning may strike a
mountaintop, it will defuse this tremendous buildup of energy,
which if permitted to sprinkle down like rain would fry a whole
city. So the approach is to diffuse any potential danger to the
creatures of the earth by spreading out the imbalances between the
cosmic energy and the earth energy in the form of weather.
You may have noticed that things are going a bit awry with the
weather lately. Every winter seems to set new records for cold
temperatures and summers set records for high temperatures.
Storms of increasing frequency and severity, snowfall of unusual
depth, drought; these are all reflections of the fact that the
earth's immune system has been severely impaired by the way you
transmit energy along high power lines, because the point where
cosmic energy and earth energy meet in equal strength, which is
where they blend, is between five and 25 feet from the earth's
surface. So here is where the earth's immune system is meant to
Page 1
kick in and evaluate the pockets of unstable energy that are
developing and to diffuse them through weather.
This whole process has been severely disturbed because this is all
electromagnetic energy coming from the sun, coming from the earth,
and by stringing these high-power wires literally all over the
earth's surface, even under the ocean, you create this barrier, this
sizzling blockage to the earth's being able to truly evaluate
what's going on and to take corrective action.
So the way you generate electricity from, say, one power plant
sending out energy for hundreds of miles, this system is severely
disturbing the earth's immune system, its ability to maintain
balance. As a result, it's going to have to be dismantled. Like
anything, it can happen one of two ways.
It can occur that you recognize that there's a violation occurring
and you set about creating a system which relieves the violation or,
failing that, you can have things collapse around you to the point
that you are forced to abandon the path that violates the earth.
It's not very likely that you would see utilities voluntarily going
out of business and giving everyone solar panels to put on their
roof. So what will happen, if this isn't addressed, is increasingly
bizarre and unstable weather patterns which will increasingly affect
food production. These disturbances will cause the appearance of
insects which previously would have kept in a tightly controlled
population, allowing them to explode in numbers.
This is one example that we want to use for this process where you
see something is a violation, you recognize it because there's a
negative result accruing, and the question is, do you make the easy
transition by saying, okay, we're violating the earth or we're
violating some natural law, we need to bring this back into harmony.
Or do you allow the system to continue, and then have something
collapse with such tremendous force and serious effect that you have
to pay attention? If the breadbasket of the country is suddenly
unable to provide food, what do you do?
We've mentioned that the current system of generating and supplying
electricity will have to be abandoned in favor of local generation
of energy at the community level or even at the level of each
individual dwelling providing its own power.
So you would have generation of electricity, then a greenbelt where
there's no electrical generation so that cosmic energy can meet the
earth energy unhindered and undisturbed. Imagine pinpricks of
light, of electrical energy, in a sea of un-electrified country.
You already have the technology, although it's crude, for generating
electricity. This science, which is in its infancy, will evolve to
a much more sophisticated level, and we suggest that it will largely
use sound for electrical generation in the future.
There exist blueprints in the realm of consciousness for mechanisms
which have an automatic feedback loop contained in them so that more
sound energy is created than was put in, so part of it will go back
Page 2
into simply feeding the machine to create the sound and the
remainder can be captured and used as electricity.
As this evolves, it will not be necessary for every house to be
bristling on the roof with solar panels that cost a fortune. It
will be something readily accessible to all regardless of the number
of sunny and cloudy days because if you have a self-perpetuating
feedback loop based on sound, rather than dependent on the weather,
then you have an eternal supply of energy.
* "The Alexander Journal", issued bimonthly, publishes
material received from Alexander, a discarnate
consciousness who channels through Ramon Stevens.
First-class subscriptions are $12 per year; 3rd-class sub-
scriptions are $10 per year (six issues). Inquire for
foreign rates.
A free brochure of Alexander books and tapes is available
from RS Enterprises, PO Box 863, Ojai, CA 93024.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Notes
The gist of this paper is that modification of weather patterns
is due to the energy grids established by power lines. The
source claims that cosmic energy meets earth energy at a zone
ranging from 5 to 25 feet above the surface of the earth. This
is where the energy blends and is diffused by the earth through
normal "healthy" weather patterns.
Suprisingly enough, this supports the concept of cascading
flows of Aether which pass into the neutral centers of mass and
serve to sustain or dissolve matter. The idea is that harmonic
or enharmonic energy is emitted by the mass or the energy
matrix which forms the mass and interacts with the inflowing
Aether to "create" the multiplicity of subsidiary energies and
effects we perceive as gravity, magnetism, electricity, light,
heat, sound, physical vibration and "static" mass aggregations.
In the case of cosmic energy per se, the frequencies involved
are already below the ability to generate gravity, magnetism or
electricity THROUGH DIVISION, however, it is still possible to
up the frequencies by a proper infusion of phased and energetic
frequencies.
So, the concept presented in this paper seems to have some
merit. If there is truly a "blending" of energy at this zone,
then it should be measurable by using a power grid as a
reference and looking for a disparity of potential or other
anomaly from the background energy level. We await your
comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/altenerg.asc
+240
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : ALTENERG.ASC | Online Date : 05/18/95 |
| Contributed by : Josef Hasslberger| Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| WWW sites - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb & http://www.protree.com |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Alternative energy needs an Alternative Economic Basis
Since the industrial revolution, energy has become an increasingly important
factor for the functioning of our economy.
No matter whether that economy is called socialist, capitalist, market
oriented or whatever, the availability of energy at an affordable price is one
of the first conditions for industrial production. Transportation and
distribution of all products, whether industrial or agricultural, is also
dependent on energy.
Because energy was of such basic importance to the economy, it soon became a
target for monopolization and we find today, that a large part of the world's
energy supply is controlled by a small number of multinational companies.
Our main concern with this energy monopoly is not the fact of its existence,
but a very serious secondary effect that is a consequence of it. This is an
absence of progress in energy technology, an almost complete stop of the
development of alternative energy production technologies.
Any new technical solutions that do get developed are improvements of fossil
fuel based technologies currently in use. For real alternatives there is no or
very little money.
Fossil fuels include coal, gas, petroleum but also uranium. These are all
substances that have been accumulated in the earth's crust in the course of
millions of years and that we are using up in the blink of an eye in a
geological time frame.
Apart from the threatening shortage of raw materials, the fossil fuel economy
has another very important drawback, which is the fact that we are destroying
our environment with the pollution that is inherent in the mining, the
transport, the transformation and the burning of fossil fuels.
If we are to believe the proponents of fossil fuels and the government
officials supporting them, there is no alternative to these fuels at this
time.
Is that really true?
No, it is definitely not true. The alternatives do exist.
We have various proposals being made right here in this exhibition.
I myself have been researching for many years in this field and can say with
certainty that there are numerous alternatives. I want to mention a few of
those that I have encountered during my research.
1) Hydroelectric power generation today uses only about 10 % of its true
potential. I am not referring here to the possibility of constructing
more dams. I am saying that current hydroelectric technology has
overlooked a large part of the energy potential of moving water.
Current technology concentrates exclusively on pressure induced upon the
body of water by gravitation. The higher the dam, the greater the
pressure. But it happens that in addition to static pressure, water
also has energy if it is simply flowing in a river. And the faster the
water flows, the more inertial energy it builds up. And this inertial
energy increases with the square of the velocity, while the static
pressure increases only in a linear relation.
Unfortunately the two energy potentials are mutually exclusive. In order
to use one, you have to destroy the other. In order to use the static
pressure energy, we first have to destroy all of the water's natural
motion-induced inertial energy by building a dam to stop the water's
flow!
It is obvious therefore, that our hydroelectric production could be much
more effective if it was using the water's natural velocity, effectively
increased by gradually reducing the diameter of the channel of flow,
instead of stopping the motion and using exclusively the gravity-induced
water pressure.
I have written about this in more detail ("Die Wasserkraft nach Ludwig
Herbrand" in raum&zeit nr 62, April 1993 and in english: "Understanding
water power" in Explore! magazine, Vol. 4, nr 1, 1993).
2) Water may also serve as a simple alternative to petrochemical fuels,
because the chemical composition of water - hydrogen and oxygen - makes
it a combustible substance.
This alternative has been historically proposed by various inventors and
has been rejected by those industrial interests that depend on fossil
fuels as unpractical and dangerous.
Most recently, the American inventor Stanley Meyer has obtained over 20
patents connected with his "water fuel cell" system. He proposes to
split water into its constituent gases by use of high frequency high
voltage electrolysis in a resonance chamber, using significantly less
energy than can be obtained from subsequent combustion, and to use the
hydrogen directly as an alternative fuel in such applications as car
motors, jet engines, household heating, cooking stoves and more.
Meanwhile in Australia, an inventor by the name of Yull Brown has
developed a similar technology, however with the difference that he has
succeeded in recombining the hydrogen and oxygen into a gas that is not
explosive but is combustible, called Brown's gas. Brown's invention is
being manufactured in China for use as an alternative supply of gas for
metal welding, but could also easily be adapted to other uses where gas
is a possible fuel.
3) A third and last example of an alternative method of energy production
is the direct conversion of the electromagnetic potential of space
background into electric energy. This is based on the concept that space
itself is permeated by a homogenous energy field of incredibly high
potential. According to the Japanese scientist Shinichi Seike, the
electric field strength of space is
E = 8.8 x 108 V/cm.
It is sufficient to bring about a discontinuity in the homogenous field,
in order to "channel" some of that abundant energy for use in various
electrical applications.
This feat has been achieved not by one, but by a whole number of
inventors and scientists. I am giving a few names here, as examples
only. The list is by no means complete.
Nikola Tesla, Henry Moray, Lester Hendershot, Howard Johnson, Hans Coler,
Edwin Gray, John R.R. Searl, Shinichi Seike, Bruce De Palma, Wingate A.
Lambertson, Paul Baumann, Robert Adams.
None of the inventions have been developed to be put into mass production, and
very few of them have even been able to take the first hurdle, to be accepted
by patent examiners. None of them have had any funding worth speaking of.
A big difficulty in this respect is our limited conception of the conservation
of energy, which is expressed in the socalled laws of thermodynamics. These
laws do not express basic truths of nature. They are based on experiential
data and have wrongly been given the status of natural laws. But still they
are used by patent offices all over the world to select out and discard any
inventions that are truly revolutionary, with the justification that the
invention violates a natural law and so could not possibly work.
I have written in more detail on thermodynamics (article not yet published: "A
new beginning for thermodynamics" and in german "Ein neuer Anfang f�r die
Thermodynamik").
Let us get back however to the economic basis for alternative energy. It is
clear that the existing fossil fuel monopoly has much influence on what is to
receive financing for development and production and what is not. And from
actual experience by many desperate inventors, there is no financing available
for a real alternative, expecially if it goes against established theories or
against the "laws of nature" as understood by science in general or if it
threatens the monopoly.
Our economy unfortunately is somewhat schizofrenic.
One part of the economy, which I would call the real economy or the people's
economy is concerned with production, with energy, with raw materials, with
distribution and commerce and with the consumption of goods by the end user.
On this level of the economy, the basis of dealings between companies and
individuals is proper exchange. In order to facilitate this exchange, we have
invented money to make it easier to buy and sell the goods that are being
produced.
The second part of the economy is the world of finance, which I would like to
call the speculative economy, whose interests unfortunately are not the same
as those of the real economy. This speculative economy is the world of
investment and speculation, of the cruel and merciless side of capitalism,
where the most important thing is not production and not the survival of
people, but the payment of interest! On this level of the economy, the basis
of dealings is out-exchange (defined as an absence of proper exchange or a
desire to get something for nothing).
The mechanism which permits this "something for nothing" of the speculative
economy is the practice of taking interest. This has become a major factor
even for the financial dealings of countries, especially those less developed
nations which have been induced to take large loans as "development aid" and
which are now unable to pay the interest, let alone pay back the loans. Their
people are starving but apparently this is of no concern to the buerocrats of
the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, or to the banks who loaned
the money.
Russia is suffering not because its people do not want to work, not because it
is poor in raw materials, but because it has to pay tribute to the speculative
side of the international economy. The austerity programs advocated by certain
economic "experts" are said to be necessary to stabilize the economy. In
reality they are needed only to make sure that the country will continue to
pay interest to its international creditors.
I have written in more detail about the question of interest and of its
influence on the economy. (Article in TOKO Zeitkompass: "Wirtschaft wohin - In
Memoriam Silvio Gesell").
Unfortunately the speculative economy has gained force in recent years and is
much stronger than the real economy. Our lives are determined by the
speculative economy. The energy monopoly is an expression of and a necessary
condition for the speculative economy.
We are witnessing a genocide of gigantic proportions, the killing of ourselves
and our children. Whether it is done through denial of proper energy
technology or through economic austerity imposed so as to collect interest,
the starving and poisoning of people is genocide and should be recognized and
stigmatized as such.
What would have to happen then, to create an economic basis for alternative
energy to develop? What can each one of us do to help bring about the needed
change?
The cure for the economy is to lead the patient back towards reality.
First and foremost, we must refuse to play the game of "something for
nothing", each one in our personal lives, and who has government
responsibility must refuse to play the game in his area of responsibility.
Refusing to play the game means both from the active and from the passive
side. As individuals and as countries we must not receive something for
nothing and we must not allow that someone else takes from us without proper
exchange.
Secondly, we must recognize that production and exchange are the basis of the
real economy, the economy that will result in people having enough to eat,
having houses, having proper education and all those things that we recognize
as necessary and positive for our lives. We should strive to strengthen the
real economy, each one according to ability and position.
Finance must be put at the service of the real economy, not the other way
around.
And we will discover that all of a sudden, there will be all kinds of funds
available for research and production, for putting into reality that dream of
alternative energy, for providing unlimited amounts of power to everyone,
practically for free, and without destroying the environment in the process.
Josef Hasslberger
November 1993
Note: This article is the text of a talk given to a seminar on alternative
energy in St.Petersburg, Russia, in November 1993.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/altsci1.asc
+530
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,530 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : ALTSCI1.ASC | Online Date : 01/09/95 |
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
This file is composed of three USENET posts, all referring to claims made by a
certain James Stephens. Please bear with some of the claims and think about
some of the theories which he says are being used in devices. They are quite
remarkable and worthy of thought and experiment......>>> Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Carolk@coombs.anu.edu.au (Carol Kavana)
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Subject: Help!!!
Date: 6 Sep 1995 23:49:12 GMT
Organization: Australian National University
Hello to all a.s.p.n-t regulars. I have been thinking where can I check
something out all night, when it suddenly occurred to me this may well be the
perfect place. There will be hard core scientists who post here.
O.K. well the first part of this will cause you all to roll eyes skywards I
know, but please bear with me.
In the sense that I tune in frequently and post very occasionally, I am a
regular on alt.alien.visitors. As you can imagine, that group is full of
people who either believe or want to believe in e.t's and lots of debunkers. I
admit up front that I belong to the former group. As you can also imagine, the
group has been abuzz with the screening of the Roswell incident pretty much
world wide last week, and this 'abuzz' has followed the usual pattern of the
group.
However, yesterday appeared a post dated 5 September 1995 from a James
Stephens, entitled 'GroomLake "Colonel" Reveals All' Now I don't know what,
who or where Groom Lake is, but I have never seen a post from someone called
James Stephens previously, although there could have been because I have only
been participating since early June. There was no reaction in the group to his
post yesterday, but there may well be today because most of the posters are
northern hemisphere, so they don't show up until the next day here in
Australia, and I haven't checked yet, I decided to post here first.
O.K. this guy James Stephens claims to have worked on the B2 bomber and its
more advanced cousins in the Air Force for twenty years. He says that not only
has there been contact between NASA and aliens, there has been and is advanced
experimentation going on with alien technology. He gives a few pages of very
technical and very scientific detail of this. I will give just a very small
selection of some of the things he says.
He starts off with a statement 'Excitation and accelerated time, less inertia,
gravity, and mass, are one in the same thing. Ships may travel hundred of
times faster than light without time dilation, and energy needed for this is
very little. Communications are also FTL.' The following is some snippets
from the long detailed section that follows: 'Some crafts we have do use
electromagnetism to nullify gravity,.....................(science detail)
This is a relatively simple and straightforward effect. And it is what
Einstein was attempting in Project Rainbow. We desperately wanted radar
invisibility. The Air Force feels it has nothing to worry about because nobody
would believe these things.........based entirely on relativity and simple
elegromagnetic laws. (Lots more scientific detail)......(pages of it) Ships
can travel faster than light. Time may be accelerated by excitation four
times. Then when we travel close enough to light, the ship simply regains the
mass or time it originally had, but it is travelling four times faster than
light when that happens.
(lots more) ......NASA's SETI is complete rubbish, coverup at its wrost. They
scan at one to ten gigahertz. No alien transmission occurs above a hundred
cycles and NASA knows this.........(lots more)
....Aliens have given clues along the way. After we conducted THE PHILADELPHIA
EXPERIMENT we were contacted......'Anyone wishing to know how our ships ae
powered would have to realize electrons cross what would in their terms be
millions of lightyears of space, and they leave in their wake a magnetic node,
or vortex.
....(loads more) In summary, the public has been misled contemptously.
.......(more)...Perhaps the United States government has reasons for keeping
this secret, but they are not in my opinion good ones...
O.K. you can see my problem, as a member of the I think and hope it's true
group, this seems so exciting. However, I have read enough scathing debunking
to not get my hopes up too much. Plus, the whole letter could be deliberate
bullshit. I am no science buff, and can't hope to glean whether there is
anything in this.
So here it is, if one of more of the regulars here could and would check this
out and respond either here or there, as to the validity (if any) of this
posting, I would be exceedingly grateful.
Thanks in Advance
Carol Kavanagh
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: robert@wwa.com (Robert Stirniman )
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
Subject: Re: Could Brian Zeiler comment on James Stephens
Date: 7 Sep 1995 06:08:26 GMT
Brian Zeiler (bdzeiler@students.wisc.edu) wrote:
: I'm not sure where it is or what it was about -- I tried looking back but
: couldn't find it. Could you repost it?
The message appeared two days ago and has already disappeared from my news
server. There was one follow on reply, which was not answered. It's a
startling and amazing message -- but hard to believe. Here it is.
==========================================================================
From: tgrpwe@ix.netcom.com (James Stephens )
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
Subject: GroomLake`Colonel`Reveals`All
Date: 5 Sep 1995 05:57:06 GMT
GroomLake `Colonel `Reveals `All
I tell how:
* Excitation and accelerated time, less inertia, gravity, and mass, are one
in the same thing.
* Ships may travel hundreds of times faster than light without time
dilation, and energy needed for this is very little. Communications are
also FTL.
* EEG waves from one to sixty cycles ARE telepathy, but they come from fast
time, so they are compressed in time or bandwidth. Ordinary radios are
not quick enough to detect the information. All we detect is this 60
cycle signal at lightspeed but information inside travels faster than
light. And an ordinary radio will reveal the signal when in an excited
state.
* Man left to himself dreams of a paradise where technology and nature are
in perfect harmony, where he is immortal and free of disease, needs, and
wants, and this can be done directly from mind to product this very day
using lightlines.
As someone who has worked on the B2 bomber and its more advanced cousins
in the Air Force for twenty years, I can tell you the whole story is
unbelievable. Twenty hours is too conservative a time estimate for complete
explanation. Some crafts we have do use electromagnetism to nullify gravity
and even extract hidden information from EEG waves, but these are not deployed
and will not be until they are needed. They pump electricity from inside
themselves into a sheet of electricity some distance away, exactly as the
earth is positive "ground" and the ionosphere a negative sheet. This sheet
bends parallel radar waves around the craft like a water droplet in a rainbow,
or just like the ionosphere bends radio waves, making for long distance
communications. This is a relatively simple and straightforward effect. And
it is what Einstein was attempting in Project Rainbow or the Philadelphia
Experiment. We desperately wanted radar invisibility. The Germans were
engaged in the same effort fifty years ago. But electric vacuum, the vortex
field, also causes excitation of atoms in it, which shifts waves in frequency
and accelerates time. I am willing to reveal all I know about these things
in full detail here.
The Air Force feels it has nothing to worry about because nobody would
believe these things, even though they require no special admission but are
based entirely on relativity and simple electromagnetic laws. First, I tell
how electrons are controlled in electromagnetic fields using physics and
Maxwell's equations. Then two systems are given for establishing a "permanent
excitation" in a volume. The practical system uses a magnetic vortex and weak
static field. Next temporal effects are described by contrasting how people
in gravity and then excitation fields perceive quanta. Then FTL travel and
communications are discussed, as well as how EEG waves are telepathy, but
information is compressed in time or bandwidth. By the end you will see there
is much more at stake in the government keeping this secret than gravity
alone.
There are three fields we can use to set up such an "electric vacuum" with
external electric sheet. These are
(1) static
(2) AC and
(3) PDC magnetic fields
and we need a description of electromagnetics to understand these. Imagine a
permanent magnet with north pole out of your monitor. Its flux can be
imagined as a large number of X marks on your screen. An electron moves in
the plane of the monitor from left to right. As it cuts flux Lorentz force F
= qvB deflects it downward. The electron actually spirals clockwise with
radius r = mv / qB, with B in teslas and all other measures in MKSA units. If
the electon came from opposite direction it would spiral same direction, or
clockwise as we see it.
Lorentz force derives from static magnetic fields when there is relative
motion between the field and electron. No force is felt when motion is
parallel to magnetic flux, only when flux lines are cut. And this static
field performs no work. The relevant Maxwell equation here is curl E = -
dB/dt, and since tesla density is static here, dB/dt is zero, curl E is zero,
and the field is by definition conservative. No work is done on electrons, so
we deduce electrons spiral but maintain the same velocity or kinetic energy.
Static electrons can also be accelerated by magnetic fields. In that case
curl E is nonzero and we see electrons must absorb energy, or be accelerated,
by the time-variant magnetic field. This case is actually the same as the
above case, but as current changes in the coil flux expands or collapses from
the coil. There is still relative motion and electrons still experience the
same Lorentz force. For example, sending pulsating instead of direct current
through the same coil in the same direction causes the same spiraling effect
on static electrons as the static field had on moving electrons. Sending AC
through causes periodic reversals of electrons. The field around the coil can
be given by E(r,t) = 1/2pir*dF/dt, where F is flux in webers. The electric
lines form concentric circles about the coil, and another way to say this is E
= f * B, where f is frequency in cps, B is average tesla density of a periodic
current, and E is volts per meter close to the coil. These three fields,
static, AC, and PDC make for any manipulation of electrons.
There are two ways to produce the sheet. Both require pumping electrons
from inside the ship into a sheet of electricity. The first does this from a
central magnetic pole. A strong static magnetic field is set up, and PDC is
sent oppositely through the pole to set up circular electric lines about it.
Electrons are accelerated circularly about the pole and as soon as they move
they experience an outward centrifugal deflection qvB. Each electron which
leaves the center of the ship creates a positive hole, and so there is also an
internal electric centripetal field F = knqq/rr, where n is the number of
electrons removed to the sheet. Each electron has potential energy - kq/r,
and the ship has the same potential energy, so it is excited, because
excitation is the only way matter absorbs electric energy without heating.
Also, one may view removing an electron from an atom as "exciting it past
ionization potential." The problem here is electrons are limited to speed of
light, and one may assume they gain lightspeed or close to it instantly in any
tangible electric field (by v=Eqt/electronmass provided collision time is high
enough). Thus speed of light acts to limit qvB centrifugal force and so limit
power in the field to around 40 megajoules, very marginal.
Another better way is to use a four-coil, two-phase ring, exactly as in
two-phase AC motor stators. Its field is in every way that of a real rotating
permanent magnet. Imagine such a magnet in the plane of your monitor. We can
show flux cuts electrons in such way Lorentz force creates unidirectional
electric lines through the monitor. That is, electrons are blown through the
screen as air molecules are blown through a circular fanblade. Now suppose we
set up the same magnet as above, a coil into the monitor. Its magnetic flux
is perpendicular to that of the rotating magnetic field. Electrons are sucked
from in front of the monitor, but since they are limited to lightspeed they
enter the static field only so far before assuming a circular orbit through
Lorentz deflection. Electrons are pulled from inside the ship parallel to
static lines, but when they begin to cut static lines just below your monitor
screen they spiral out to the same radius as above. Without velocity greater
than light they can go no farther. So lightspeed, once our enemy, now means
we can put almost any energy into the field we wish. No energy is lost in the
field except by collisions, which are minimal at higher electric frequencies,
and zero in vacuum. Field density is a function solely of magnetic vortex
frequency and tesla density, or electric field strength in volts per meter.
The stronger this electric field the more electrons are stripped from inside
the ship and more dense the electric sheet becomes. Very little energy is
needed at higher frequencies to produce sheets dense enough to bend light,
even with its high frequency.
Note here an oblate spheroid sheet of charge is formed which may become
very dense. Anything in it will be heated electrically. Inside there are
powerful electric fields, though these are no more dangerous than the 10 kV/m
field under a thundercloud, and there is no internal Joule heat because
electrons are held outside the ship. Charge in either hemisphere rotates
opposite to that in the other hemisphere. This can be seen by considering
Lorentz force. Electrons entering the static field from outside are deflected
one direction. Those leaving the static field from inside are deflected in
the opposite direction. This bears similarities to Coriolis force, and if so,
so be it. Let this be indicative of a gravitational connection.
We find this field also accelerates time, which can be seen as decreasing
gravity, mass, or inertia through relativity. One way to view this is as
follows. A ship near light has its time slow, and this may happen so much the
universe dies in a blink of these peoples' eyes. Since time is slower one may
say they see more cycles per second and frequencies are shifted up. But this
does not happen. Instead, they are not quick enough to perceive as much
information as we do. So according to Hartley's law their incoming
frequencies and bandwidths are compressed. People outside, on the other hand,
see these people moving extremely slowly so more information is available to
them, and they see bandwidth and frequencies boosted. This is only a relative
effect, because quantum energy is conserved, and so real information and
frequency of light are constants when absolutely figured. But different
temporal and excitation levels of the observer obviously change frequency
perception.
Excitation causes shifts opposite to gravity. For instance, if atoms are
excited electrons are farther from nuclei, and under less electric force.
They are more loosely bound. Now incoming quanta of the same hv energy cause
greater transistions than before, and so appear to have more quantum energy or
frequency. Waves from inside seem to be high in energy but low in energy or
frequency to people outside. Again, like gravity, this is a conservative
field, affecting only perception. However, its shift is opposite to
gravity's. Since gravity's effect on frequency derived from slowing of time
what effect other than accelerating of time does excitation derive from? Note
here excitation does not have to cause actual transistions to higher orbital
to give frequency shift effects. Given Schrodinger wave constraints such is
not possible. With electric vacuum suction on electrons incoming quanta still
take less energy to cause transistions.
The main problem we had was finding means for excitation without
relaxation, which normally releases all stored energy in ten billionths of a
second. Energy required for any significant frequency shift is enormous.
Setting up a weak static magnetic field allows a sort of resonance effect,
where massive amounts of energy are absorbed by the field without release.
Excitation and resonance are only obtainable when relaxation is eliminated as
it can be in the magnetic vortex system.
What uses are this? Ships can travel faster than light (FTL). Time may be
accelerated by excitation four times. Then when we travel close enough to
light, the ship simply regains the mass or time it originally had, but it is
travelling four times faster than light when that happens. Thus any star in
this or any other galaxy are within reach without time dilation and with very
little energy input. Remember, NO supplemental energy is needed in vacuum due
to infinite collision time. Another way to view FTL travel is the people in
the ship may accelerate to 200 meters per second in their seconds. Someone
outside has four seconds for one of theirs, so the ship seems to them to
travel at 800 meters per second to an external observer.
Faster than light communications are also possible, but not without another
effect. Suppose we emit a 1 to 60 megacycle signal from a field where time is
accelerated one million times. This is possible because energy required
decays exponentially for faster times. The signal leaves and shifts down to 1
to 60 cycles. Anyone outside sees only this 60 cycle "magnetic wave"
travelling at light. The information inside is compressed in time or
bandwidth. But it does penetrate water and other matter very well. Another
antenna in the same one million field expands bandwidth, or is "quick" enough
to get at the original information. This again shows the interconvertibility
of time and bandwidth. And EEG waves from one to sixty cycles contain more
information than presently thought. The reason for FTL propagation is the
same as a stationary observer looking at light in a lightclock on a
relativistic ship. Light seems to travel faster in this ship and since
Einstein took lightspeed to be constant, he saw time must slow on the ship.
But this gravity field makes light travel faster relative to the temporal
state of the stationary observer (ref INSIDE RELATIVITY by Mook and Vargish).
In our case, the signal travels a million times faster than light because
gravity outside the ship is a million times greater.
Aliens do exist, but the public is taken for granted (to put it mildly).
NASA's SETI is complete rubbish, coverup at its worst. They scan at one to
ten gigahertz. No alien transmission occurs above a hundred cycles and NASA
knows this. They are all compressed in time, like subspace communication on
Startrek. Nothing else has comparable efficiency. Light takes perhaps
fifteen minutes to reach another planet, but is all but instantaneous with
compression. EEG wave telepathy is another coverup, even though brain-related
signals have never been detected anywhere else on our spectrum. By mutual
exchange of information links can be made through lightlines, which convey
force, energy, or information even through walls. This gives complete control
over reality itself, and it is hard to overstate its importance. Communication
with the dead, and eternal life are easy, so too manufacturing directly from
mind to product. Truth be told this planet will be socialist, but only when
matter is so ridiculously easy to manipulate anyone who says "pay me" will
have to mean it as a joke. Telepathy is only thought from fast time, or
excitation field (as in the brain), while matter is only thought frozen in
slow time, or gravity field; but since gravity and excitation are one spectrum
there is no separation between mind and reality, life or death.
Aliens have given clues along the way. After we conducted THE PHILADELPHIA
EXPERIMENT, we were mailed a book THE CASE FOR THE UFO: ANNOTATED EDITION with
quotes written in the margins by philosophical aliens who said: "Anyone
wishing to know how our ships are powered would have to realize electrons
cross what would in their terms be millions of lightyears of space, and they
leave in their wake a magnetic node, or vortex, as this one thing is variously
called. Realizing this, as Einstein did, it makes it clear how matter may be
made into energy, dissolute, or invisible." This book as well as George
Adamski's INSIDE THE FLYING SAUCERS were required reading for us in the Air
Force. Other truthful sources are found in THE FLYING SAUCER READER by Jay
David who said: "You wonder how our ships operate. They operate in resonating
electromagnetic fields, just as planetary bodies do." and BEYOND EARTH: MAN'S
CONTACTS WITH UFOS by Ralph and Judy Blum, who said "The ship is powered by
reversible electro-magnetism. Reversing magnetic and electric energies allows
us to nullify gravity and control matter." The greatest source of information
is Adamski's book though.
Taking these sources as accurate would have been all the public would have
needed to come to the conclusion excitation nullifies gravity. Look at it
this way. If gravity can be electromagnetically overcome, which is our only
practical way to ever hope to overcome gravity anyway, gravity has to be
electromagnetic. Then it must be acting on some electric or magnetic property
in matter, due to concept of dual poles. Otherwise no electro-magnetic force
could be coupled. This reduces the problem to finding the one magnetic or
electrical property intrinsic to all mass, because gravity acts on all mass.
Diamagnetism is that universally intrinsic property, but even that is related
to distance of electrons from nuclei by formula for magnetic moment M=IA, or
moment equals current times looparea. This does not tell whether proximity to
or distance from nuclei is antigravity, but directly suggests that
correspondence exists.
In summary, the public has been misled contemptously. They have told you
aliens are not visiting the Earth and do not exist. Rather than spacecraft,
people are seeing the whole planet Venus fly across the sky. Then they start
an "effort" to find signals from intelligent beings, which they have already
detected below 100 cycles. There have been signals picked up even on the
frequencies they scan for, but all signals aliens normally use are below 100
cycles and can never be picked up with conventional equipment. Finally comes
the ultimate insult. The world can be better than science fiction has ever
dreampt of, with devices to beam information directly into brains for virtual
reality, access information from any source, which would make the internet
pale in comparison, derive energy from the sun through its lines, and
literally construct anything as if by magic. Everyone on this planet who has
died since 1967 did not have to, the only cure for AIDS, cancer, and
particularly genetic diseases lies in these lightlines. This is what the
public is being kept in the dark about. Perhaps the United States government
has reasons for keeping this secret, but they are not in my opinion good ones.
Ultimately it is not the Air Force's problem the public does not presently
enjoy these things, if you know what I mean. To be heard one has to make some
noise.
Sincerely,
James Stephens
tgrpwe@ix.netcom.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: tgrpwe@ix.netcom.com (James Stephens )
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Subject: UFO Excitation ESP?
Date: 27 Aug 1995 06:26:00 GMT
**************************************************************
* To: People of Planet Saras
* From: tgrpwe@ix.netcom.com
* Subject: UFO Excitation Fields, ESP, Antigravity
**************************************************************
Is it odd not how doctor Wilst could say what he did? Hasn't anyone out
there read George Adamski. Little wonder with the government conspiracy and
Lee Harvey Oswald. Too little time, Atlantia waters warming, polar ice caps
melting, weather changes, nude beaches, coverup, pole shift inevitable....
INEVITABLE.
In sum, we reach all stars in this galaxy easier than governers want us to
know, but they know as Einstein did. And same EXCITATION accelerates time and
allows FTL travel, communications, and upward frequency shifts to boot. Now
surpise: aliens transmit invariably below 100 cycles despite bandwidth
information constraints, because their waves are compressed in time itself,
and EEG waves from 1 to 60 cycles are telepathy we have never found. Ordinary
radios in "electric vacuum" fields pick it all out as broadcast, and there are
means I know to raise body frequency and use telepathy / clairvoyance in two
hours mentally, but all things minds can do machines do and vice versa because
there is no division but our belief between realms.
Something simple as orbital excitation nullifies gravity and speeds up
time. Three mind-stretching proofs:
(1) Since our only practical means to nullify gravity is electro-magnetic,
gravity must be electromagnetic and due to concept of dual poles acts
on an electrical or magnetic property of mass. The only universally
intrinsic EM property of mass is diamagnetism, but even this is related
to distance of electrons from nuclei (ie; excitation) by magnetic
moment M=IA. This logical or Greek method.
(2) Permeability and permittivity are directly propor. to distance of
electrons from nuclei, thus allowing external magnetic and electric
fields to more easily distort excited orbitals and store energy in the
atom. But according to Maxwell's Wave Equation speed of light is
determined by one over squareroot of permeability times permittivity in
ANY spatial region. So excitation must affect speed of light just as
relativistic gravity speeds light. This EM refract method.
(3) A ship near light has slow time, or great gravity / mass, than one
static. So people inside see the universe die in the blink of an eye.
How can they be quick enough to get as much information as we get? And
does this not through Hartley's Bandwidth=Information Law suggest
bandwidth AND frequencies have been divided by tau time-dilation? Aha!
This clear and present danger ironclad proof.
Now an excited atom. Its electrons are farther from nuclei, under less
electric force, and incoming quanta of same E=hv quantum energy or frequency
now cause greater transistions than in unexcited atoms. So person in an
excited field perceive incoming waves as higher frequency, and several waves,
boosted in bandwidth or information content as well. Hartley's
Law===>bandwith=information.
So since gravity compressed bandwidth by slowing time, excitation here must
be accelerating time, or converting mass into energy. Here we see excitation
overcomes gravity, mass, and time in not one but THREE independent proofs with
yet another coming later. But consider great potential use.
There are several uses for this. A ship of hydrogen excited into n=2
orbital. Time accelerates four times using E=hv calculations. It can now go
four times faster than light before regaining its original gravity or mass!
Proxima Centauri is one year away. But this takes 1o eV per atom. With only
3.6 eV more we totally ionize hydrogen (ie; frequency shift it to infinity).
Thus we are not limited by distance or time in travel as Relativity suggests,
because energy needed is not linear but exponentially decays for higher
speeds.
Or another application based on frequency shift. We have never picked up
telepathic signals, but have picked up EEG waves at 1 to 6o cycles. If these
enter an excited region they shift up in frequency (or relatively perceived
quantum energy), expanding bandwidth, and baring their original information
content, beautiful like goat's milk. This is surprises. Thought reigns as
physical as we are, but it operates from faster time; likewise, matter is only
thought frozen in slow time. Thus we shall be using a mental energy before we
can reach the nearest star. This paragraph alone has significant
implications because
(1) machines can be built to control reality directly
(2) the human mind from my experience can produce these fields when
certain rites of gestured belief are performed and
(3) if brains produce energy for such great downshift energy to travel
between stars must be meager indeed.
All these things derive from excitation, a simple quantum mechanical
occurence, but how do we produce excitation without heat or normal 0.01
microsecond relaxation? Means to produce permanent electric vacuum is needed,
for as long as the field is applied. This can be done using two-phase four-
coil system (precisely as in AC motor stator but higher frequency) to create a
rotating magnetic field. An orthogonal static magnetic field then limits
electron flux to spherical surface some distance from ship, which adds
potential energy to these electrons (and contrawise the ship). There is no
heating of crew because electron flux is outside ship but they are exposed to
high electric fields as under thunderclouds.
Earth operates in such magnetic vortex. It explains the earth's positive
ground charge, its negative ionosphere layer, and Coriolis force. The last is
explained because Lorentz deflection in above electric vacuum system is in
opposite directions in north and south fieldsphere hemisphere, so electrons in
different hemispheres revolve in opposite directions about the ship. High
frequencies are needed to provide sufficient voltage and increase collision
time for electrons so energy is not wasted. Again electrons are responsible
for inertia, causing water to lag in different directions in different
hemispheres. The electric sheet has force and inertia but the ship does not.
And this is another proof for antigravity.
Yet another use presents itself. The ionosphere bends radio waves
depending on their angle and frequency because they travel at different speed
through this highly charged region. This was alluded to in permeability and
permittivity. Why not create such intense field around a ship parallel radar
or light rays are bent around the ship, like water droplets in a Rainbow.
This could be done if the field were intense enough and right distance from
the ship. And it is invisibility, though anyone in such fields could escape
faster than we perceive, because their time is faster. The science is sound
(more or less).
Then what are we waiting for! Let's go find Adamski's Firkon of Mars and
ask directions to the nearest starbase. I have plenty more rolling around in
my head, and will readily go into fine technical detail in any area
aforementioned. Give me feedback, most if not all is too technically
abbreviated here to realize without more depth discussion. They said I was
too unstable, and kicked me out of prison because of my theories, but now my
views are sared. Join me and the other ben men of the universe to build a
better tomorrow on planet Saras. And E-mail me at tgrpwe@ix.netcom.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/antiflam.asc
+265
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : ANTIFLAM.ASC | Online Date : 05/09/95 |
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| WWW sites - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb & http://www.protree.com |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following are some interesting comments regarding open-mindedness towards
alternative approaches, concepts and experiments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: sci.energy,alt.energy.renewable,alt.paranet.science,alt.sci.
physics.new-theories
Path: news.cc.uch.gr!news.forth.gr!ecrc!Munich.Germany.EU.net!Germany.EU.net!
howland .reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!openwx!eskimo!billb
From: billb@eskimo.com (William Beaty)
Subject: Re: TMI device, free energy device ?
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eskimo.com
Message-ID: <D52uq5.3Cu@eskimo.com>
Sender: usenet@eskimo.com (News User Id)
Organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <793832711snz@codesmth.demon.co.uk> <3isttf$2uf@news.uncc.edu>
<3ittji$hnu@sundog.tiac.net> <3jg2q0$l2m@homesick.cs.unlv.edu>
<3jhkps$j3h@sundog.tiac.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 1995 15:51:40 GMT
Lines: 62
Xref: news.cc.uch.gr sci.energy:23613 alt.paranet.science:415
alt.sci.physics.new-theories:3201
To: conover@max.tiac.net (Harry H Conover)
Subject: Re: TMI device, free energy device ?
Newsgroups: sci.energy,alt.energy.renewable,alt.paranet.science,alt.sci.
physics.new-theories
Organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever
In article <3jhkps$j3h@sundog.tiac.net> you wrote:
<delete>
: There's a big difference between being open minded and empty headed.
: Unfortunately, those that perpetuate the myth of perpetual motion, free
: energy, and other something from nothing devices fall into the later
: category.
I think you are making a basic error here. There are two phenomena you are
lumping together: perpetual motion and free energy. Perpetual motion is in
the same class as Maxwell's Demon devices: foolish to pursue.
But there's evidence here and there for devices which RECEIVE energy from an
unknown source. The ones I'm thinking of are not scams or hoaxes (where the
inventors had their lives wrecked by announcing their discoveries.)
It is entirely within the bounds of conventional physics that there could be
undiscovered mechanisms for converting matter to energy, for changing neutrino
flux into electric power, for building "tame spacewarps" to extract power,
etc.
A working "perpetual motion" machine is not very likely, but it is not
impossible. And if anyone ever comes up with one, it will quickly be renamed
"energy receiver" or some such. After all, everyone knows that "perpetual
motion" machines are impossible.
: Rejection of man's accumulated body of scientific knowledge isn't
: being 'open minded' -- It's being ignorant, stupid, or both.
This sounds like a cliche', but its true: those that pursued powered flight,
spacecraft, etc., were accused of the same thing. A few decades ago, planes
and spacecraft were foolish dreams, and any who worked towards them were
ridiculed. Only in hindsight are the true fools obvious.
: As I've said before, free energy scemes, perpetual motion, et al are fun to
: contemplate as logical puzzles or, at times, exercises in deception,
: however, anyone that beleves such devices are real, risks labeling
: themselves a fool.
....No, anyone who believes such devices COULD be real, risks BEING labeled a
fool by people who are ready to heap ridicule on others whose beliefs about
what might be possible differ from their own.
I think of it this way: in five hundred years, will mankind be using power
generators which extract energy directly from the vacuum? If so, will such
generators be based on discoveries that the researchers of today could have
made, had they just known where to look? Maybe.
And it's possible that someone today is looking right at the effects that lead
to these generators, yet discounts them as being measurement mistakes, since
energy cannot just come from nowhere!
--
.....................uuuu / oo \ uuuu........,.............................
William Beaty voice:206-781-3320 bbs:206-789-0775 cserv:71241,3623
EE/Programmer/Science exhibit designer http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/
Seattle, WA 98117 billb@eskimo.com SCIENCE HOBBYIST web page
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Path: news.cc.uch.gr!news.forth.gr!ecrc!Munich.Germany.EU.net!Germany.EU.net!
EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!jobone!
fiesta.srl.ford.com!pt9201.ped.pto.ford.com!pt9217.ped.pto.ford.com!
millerb
From: millerb@pt9217.ped.pto.ford.com (Bryan Miller)
Newsgroups: sci.energy,alt.energy.renewable,alt.paranet.science,alt.sci.
physics.new-theories
Subject: Re: TMI device, free energy device ?
Date: 7 Mar 1995 21:03:27 GMT
Organization: Ford Motor Co., Powertrain Electronics
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <3jihmv$5n0@pt9201.ped.pto.ford.com>
References: <793832711snz@codesmth.demon.co.uk> <3isttf$2uf@news.uncc.edu>
<3ittji$hnu@sundog.tiac.net> <3jg2q0$l2m@homesick.cs.unlv.edu>
<3jhkps$j3h@sundog.tiac.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pt9217.ped.pto.ford.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: news.cc.uch.gr sci.energy:23626 alt.paranet.science:416
alt.sci.physics.new-theories:3215
Harry H Conover (conover@max.tiac.net) appears to have written:
[snip snip]
>Rejection of man's accumulated body of scientific knowledge isn't
>being 'open minded' -- It's being ignorant, stupid, or both. As I've
>said before, free energy scemes, perpetual motion, et al are fun to
>contemplate as logical puzzles or, at times, exercises in deception,
>however, anyone that beleves such devices are real risks labeling
>themselves a fool. If it isn't immediately clear to you why this is so,
>you need to do more homework.
> Harry C.
Where does one draw the line on the definition of free energy? How do we
label energy created by wind or water motion? How does this vary from the
earth's magnetic fields (if I have been following this thread correctly...)?
I have no connection with these fellows nor their research. However, making
blanket statements such as there is no free energy is a bit bold. Yes, yes I
know. The laws of physics. If you read Penrose or Hawking you'll discover
that it ain't all been figured out yet...
cheers,
Bryan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Path: news.cc.uch.gr!news.forth.gr!ecrc!Munich.Germany.EU.net!Germany.EU.net!
howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!news.dsndata.com!backbone!
crcnis3.unl.edu! cse.unl.edu!romig
From: romig@cse.unl.edu (Phil Romig)
Newsgroups: alt.philosophy.objectivism,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,
sci.physics,sci.research
Subject: Re: The Farce of Physics
Date: 15 Mar 95 22:15:30 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska--Lincoln
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <romig.795305730@cse.unl.edu>
References: <3jgamd$op0@acasun.eckerd.edu> <3jguql$qdn@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>
<3jq4tt$ce6@stc06.CTD.ORNL.GOV> <D5AI1A.56I@eskimo.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cse.unl.edu
Xref: news.cc.uch.gr alt.philosophy.objectivism:4726 alt.sci.physics.new-
theories:3272 sci.astro:58785 sci.physics:76471 sci.research:4904
fernando@eskimo.com (Fernando Loygorri) writes:
>I don't have the technical expertise to tell whether people like Lerner, Arp
>or Hoyle are right or wrong, but their books certainly point out clearly
>that the scientific research may be tainted by money, power and inflated
>egos.
I have been reading a collection of essays by Stephen Hawking and I think he
makes a good point on this topic. He says that few who understand the process
would deny what you said, scientific research is fraught with problems,
particularly egos. That's how it works.
The essay says that research in physics is a continuing cycle. A new theory
is accepted, which explains the world as we can see it. Over the years a
great deal of time and even emotion is invested in that theory. Then, as our
measurements of the world get better, cracks in the theory begin to show up.
Because we have so much invested we try to make the old theory fit, until it
becomes an ugly mass with stuff sticking out all over. Then along comes some
revolutionary new theory which wipes out all (or most) of the old, and again
provides us with a nice, clean way of looking at the world. Then of course it
all starts over again.
It's happened many times. I remember seeing a picture of mechanical system
that described the motion of the planets in the sky, assuming that they all
orbited the earth (let me tell you it was complex. They had things doing
figure eights that would make an ice-skater sick).
Then someone says "hey, let's try the SUN at the middle" and (100 years and
several excommunications later) we have a nice, simple system again. It
happened with Maxwell, it happened with relativity and it happened with
quantum mechanics.
I think the point is not that this way of doing things if flawed, but rather
that we need to be aware that we do have illogical attachments to the theories
we grew up with, so that when a new "revolutionary" one comes by we don't
totally reject it. What we want to avoid is the 100 years and several
excommunications. On the other hand our attachment to old theories does
provide a safety check, preventing us from accepting every new fangled thing
that comes down the pipe.
Hope this contributes something.
******************************************************************************
Phil Romig
romig@cse.unl.edu
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
- Edmund Burk
******************************************************************************
Vanguard Note
For those who continue to dispute not only the possibility of free energy
and perpetual motion, but the simple INDISPUTABLE fact of it, simply look
around you.
Current understanding of mass is that an electron continually rotates
around the nucleus of an atom by virtue of what power? Not only that, but
a similar mysterious force moves the planets in their orbits.
Is this not 'perpetual motion'? Why can we not learn to tap into this
same force and use it to drive the wheelworks of our machines, to produce
useable FREE (beyond the cost of the conversion devices) power?
There are numerous approaches; high voltage, back-emf, thermodynamic,
magnetic, mechanical, leverage, atmospheric electricity accumulations,
low-level mass conversion, etc..
We (all who participate in the info exchange in alternative science
researches) will eventually come up with something that will be shared
with the world through computer networks and snailmail networks.
At that time, we shall see the true colors of all these naysayers who have
some malicious ax to grind as they suddenly try to claim they always knew
it was just a matter of time. So please, break your neck, get your
negative comments and other flames documented in email and other file
forms.
When our people are flying without planes, powered by boxes that pull
energy directly from space, living hundreds of years without disease or
aging symptoms, colonizing other planets and visiting other star systems,
we who could see beyond 'laws' will look down and pity all those who chose
to never get off their knees in their subservience to science dogma.
Yes, there are lab queens, i.e. devices that have anomalous or peculiar
effects, sometimes unstable and which only work in a perfect environment
(IF THAT!), but we cannot ignore it or discount it because analysis of
such phenomena will gain us an understanding of how we can create, control
and use it in a practical sense.
It's all just a giant puzzle, with pieces coming from all over to help us
put it together. So, don't let some of these flamers get you down, think
about things FOR YOURSELF, talk to others who might offer clues or places
to get further informaion, experiment however you can and document it to
share with others. If we all share with each other, it will truly be just
a matter of time before we have a working device to blaze the trail to all
the subsequent improvements.
Jerry/Sysop/KeelyNet
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/aperpetu.asc
+133
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : APERPETU.ASC | Online Date : 05/07/95 |
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| WWW sites - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb & http://www.protree.com |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following file refers to 'A Perpetual Motion Idea'.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nazrael@cats.ucsc.edu (James Vanmeter)
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Subject: Yet another idea for a perpetual motion machine...
Date: 4 Jul 1994 03:33:58 GMT
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
Lines: 116
Message-ID: <2v7vv6$p93@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: si.ucsc.edu
An idea for a perpetual motion machine was recently presented to me and I
can't find the flaw in it. It makes use of the Meissner effect and the fact
that magnetic fields propagate at finite velocity.
Imagine a bar magnet with an axle through its center, that is, in between the
north and south poles. It is free to spin on its axle and is somehow mounted
within and coaxial to a superconducting cylinder.
The cross-sectional view looks like something like this:
***
* *
* |S| *
* |+| *
* |N| *
* *
***
except that the asterisks, representing the cylinder wall, are supposed to
form a complete circle. Also, the radius of the cylinder is preferrably quite
large, for reasons that will soon be made clear.
Now the superconducting cylinder reflects the magnetic field of the bar
magnet. Each pole of the magnet "sees" its reflected image in the cylinder
wall, in effect creating virtual magnets:
|N|
| |
|S|
***
* *
* |S| *
* |+| *
* |N| *
* *
***
|N|
| |
|S|
(There would of course be virtual magnets all along the circumferrence, or
equivalently one big cylindrical magnet with orientation opposite that of the
bar magnet. But the above simplification seems good enough for purposes of
illustration.)
If we give the real magnet a spin, then the virtual magnets orbit it. If the
magnetic fields propagated instantaneously, then the orbit of the virtual
magnets would be in perfect synchrony with the spin of the real magnet, they
would always be perfectly opposed as shown above, and the net effect on the
real magnet would be nil. Thus the magnet would spin freely until friction on
its axle eventually brought it to a halt.
However the fields do not propagate instantaneously. The spinning magnet will
rotate a bit before it receives its reflection -- a magnetic image of its
orientation a moment ago. After an initial spin, the orbit of thevirtual
magnets lags behind. The larger the radius of the cylinder andthus the
greater the distance between it and the magnet, the greater thelag.
An instantaneous snap-shot of the magnetic fields from the real magnet's
perspective could look something like this:
|N|
| |
|S|
***
* *
* /S/ *
* /x/ *
* /N/ *
* *
***
|N|
| |
|S|
where the real magnet has been given an initial spin in the clockwise
direction and the virtual magnets lag behind, say, 30 degrees at the moment
depicted. Clearly the virtual magnets encourage the real magnet to keep
spinning.I suspect that there is a flaw in my thinking, but it seems to me,
and tothe person who proposed this to me, that with a proper set-up and after
theinitial spin the virtual magnets will proceed to chase the real magnet
aroundand around forever. The angular velocity of the magnet will increase,
wefigure, until the phase-lag between it and the virtual magnets equals 180
degreees:
|N|
| |
|S|
***
* *
* |N| *
* |+| *
* |S| *
* *
***
|N|
| |
|S|
(Note that a phase-lag of 180 degrees means that their orientationsare in
phase, since the virtual magnets started out at rest with orientations 180 out
of phase with the real magnet.) The angular velocity now remainsconstant.
So for those who have followed all this, what's the flaw?
Reply to : nazrael@cats.ucsc.edu (James Vanmeter)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/archblue.asc
+121
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : ARCHBLUE.ASC | Online Date : 05/18/95 |
| Contributed by : Josef Hasslberger| Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| WWW sites - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb & http://www.protree.com |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
This is highly similar to the 1935 Dallasite, 'Dad' Garrett and his Hydrolytic
Carburetor, all detailed in the file GARRETT1.ZIP as researched by and listed
on KeelyNet. The vehicle was driven around White Rock Lake using 1 gallon of
water from the lake. It was later driven all over Dallas with no problems or
engine damage to the 4 cylinder engine.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hydrogen in internal combustion engines
This is a translation of an article that appeared in the magazine "IMPLOSION"
in german language, in 1983. The title of the article is
WATER - FUEL OF THE FUTURE?
and I would like to make this information available as it describes one of the
simplest methods of separating water into hydrogen and oxygen for use as fuel
in an internal combustion engine, with an expenditure of electrical energy
much inferior to the energy content of the hydrogen gas obtained.
Here is the text of the article:
Almost all drivers have made the experience that the motor runs better when it
rains. This is also a reason why our parents sprayed coal with water to make
it burn better. Therefore it is no wonder that for years some drivers have
used a kind of water spray injector, which is very simple.
It is a container of plastic or glass, which can be closed airtight. A thin
pipe with an acquarium valve leads through the top cover down close to the
bottom of the container.
A second pipe enters only about 5 cm into the container from the top cover and
is connected with the carburetor or the air filter. The container is filled
with water to just below the level of the second pipe.
The suction of the carburetor pulls air through the water in the container and
so adds hydrogen and oxygen to the gas mixture, which results in a lowered
consumption of gasoline.
This simple mechanism was improved by the New Zealand inventor Archie Blue
with some additions so that the water vapor alone can run an internal
combustion engine, without gasoline. It runs about 40 km with 1 liter of
water.
His American patent (number 4,124,463) is so simple that anyone with
mechanical skills can produce it. On the non-metallic air pipe that enters the
container, are mounted at equidistant intervals eight corrosion free round
metallic plates, which have been perforated with numerous holes. They are
electrified alternately with positive and negative DC voltage from the car
battery (12 Volt, 2-3 Amp).
The resulting electrolysis separates the water into oxygen and hydrogen which
attach to the metal plates in small bubbles. The air bubbles forced through
the water by the suction of the carburetor take those small bubbles of
hydrogen and oxygen with them to the top of the container.
The energy thus obtained is three times that of gasoline per weight. No
poisonous exhaust gases are produced because the end product of combustion is
water vapor.
The air needs only 4 % of enrichment with these gases to burn hotter and
faster than natural gas.
Warm water is easier to electrolyse and therefore a heating element is mounted
in the bottom of the container.
Translation by Josef Hasslberger
Rome, Italy, March 1995
Note: I have not been able so far to obtain the original patent referred to in
the article, but would be interested in a copy if someone happens to get one.
Here an attempt to reproduce the design in ascii:
ELECTROLYTIC CELL
Mixture H2/O2/air (out)
<---- ________________
___________________ ( <---- Air (in)
__________________ ) I ______________
I I I I
_____I I__________I I__________________
/ I I I I /
/ I I /
/ I I /
/ I I /
/ I I /
/ I I /
/ + I I /
12 V DC(+) / ---------------I--I--------------- /
/ - I I /
12 V DC(-) / ---------------I--I--------------- /
/ + I I /
/ ---------------I--I--------------- /
/ - I I /
/ ---------------I--I--------------- /
/ + I I /
/ ---------------I--I--------------- /
/ - I I /
/ ---------------I--I--------------- /
/ + I I /
/ ---------------I--I--------------- /
/ - I I /
/ ---------------I--I--------------- /
/ I I /
/ o o I I o o /
/ o o IooI o o /
/ o <-- air --> o /
/ /
/ /
/______________________________________/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/autodyna.asc
+61
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : AUTODYNA.ASC | Online Date : 04/30/95 |
| Contributed by : David Hilster | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
From: keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker)
Subject: Re: http://www.protree.com/KeelyNet/index.html
To: David de Hilster <hilster@coyote.TRW.COM>
To: bgarth@protree.com
Hi Bob!
The keelynet@ix.netcom.com address is the InterNet address for the original
KeelyNet located in Dallas. It is not currently linked in any way to the
InterNet, but there are 'mirror' files from the board.
Therefore, anything you might want posted on the protree.com page should be
addressed to Bob Garth bgarth@protree.com
I am attempting to forward him a copy of this document so he will have your
information and a contact address hilster@coyote.TRW.COM
Thank you for the notice, how would one go about getting this 75 pages of
compiled material and is it possible for it to be listed as a file for many
others to study??....thanks...>>> Jerry/Sysop/KeelyNet BBS
You wrote:
>
>Please consider adding the following URL to your
>Home Page:
>
>The Society for the Advancement of Autodynamics
>announces its Home Pages on the WWW. After 4 months
>of intensive work, the SAA has put together 75 pages
> of comprehensive text, diagrams, and graphics
>explaining a new theory of relativity called
>Autodynamics.
>
>Autodynamics is a superset of Special Relativity
>picking up where Special Relativity leaves off.
>Among Autodynamics' implications are: the ability
>to describe important experimental data that Special
>Relativity cannot (e.g., muon decay, nucleus-nucleus
>collision, proton-proton annihilation), the theoretical
>lifting of the light speed barrier (including an
>experiment for creating faster-than-light-speed
>photons), the description of decay events without
>the neutrino, and a description of a system for
>gravity based on an elemental quantum particle
>that also explains the perihelion advance for the
>orbits of Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars.
>
>http://www.webcom.com/~saa
>
>email: saa@webcom.com
>
>-David de Hilster
> SAA President
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/ballite1.asc
+195
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : BALLITE1.ASC | Online Date : 05/22/95 |
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| WWW sites - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb & http://www.protree.com |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following messages relate to the formation of small ball lightning globes.
It is the first time I've seen anything about this phenomenon since we first
saw it back in 1988, while doing a lightning show (ZAP-DALLAS). While bolts
of electricity stream off the arms, I had noticed small yellowish globes about
1/4" in diameter which appeared above the skin and flowed with the streaming
electricity. This only occurred around 800,000 Volts or higher.
Since sodium fluoresces yellowish orange, it seemed likely these small spheres
originated from salt. Part of the show required a saturated salt spray to be
sprayed onto the feet and a metal plate to enhance conductivity. Distilled
water was sprayed on the head to keep the hair from catching on fire.
In an attempt to track the source of the spheres down, we took great pains
that no salt water was allowed anywhere near the arms. It did not matter, as
the spheres still appeared. We finally concluded it must be body salts that
were being carried to the surface of the skin due to iontophoresis. This is
probably not the final answer, but is the closest we could get to an
explanation. .GIF images are available as ZAP1, ZAP2 AND ZAP3. We could
never get a picture of the spheres because of lighting and proximity problems.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: edward@uhuru.uchicago.edu (Edward Lewis)
Subject: Tiny Ball Lightning have been found!
Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (News Administrator)
Organization: University of Chicago
Date: Tue, 9 May 1995 01:16:12 GMT
Lines: 112
alt.sci.physics.new-theories:14533
(c) 1994 by Edward Lewis All Rights Reserved
December 22, 1994
I have been posting articles about tiny ball lightning and plasmoids for a
while now. In a letter to the Editor in the December, 1994 issue of FUSION
TECHNOLOGY, Matsumoto reports about the observation of tiny ball lightning in
several cold fusion experiments, and he suggests that people use nuclear
emulsions. He's written manuscripts about tiny ball lightning that are
produced by discharge apparatus also. Sufficient evidence of the production
of things that can be called "plasmoids" or tiny ball lightning is the many
kinds of plasmoid traces that Matsumoto has produced, and the EB-filament
paper by Nardi and Bostick et al.: V. Nardi, W. H. Bostick, J. Feugeas, and
W. Prior, "Internal Structure of ELectron-Beam Filaments," Physical Review A,
22, no. 5, 2211 (November, 1980). This is substantial proof, in my opinion.
Some of the ring traces are very similar, and some of the other traces are
similar too. I'd also like to suggest that people use nuclear emulsions awith
various kinds of cold fusion and plasmoid experiments. Many of the plasmoids
produced by electrolysis and discharge are the same. And people have known
for a long time that plasmoids and discharges are associated with neutron
production. They are the locus of neutron production.
(c) 1994 by Edward Lewis All Rights Reserved
I've posted versions of this article several times on this newsgroup since
December of 1993; and I've posted several articles about plasmoids and cold
fusion on this newsgroup since January of 1993. If anyone wants to reproduce
or resend this article, get my permission first.
PLASMOIDS AND COLD FUSION
W. Bostick produced that which he called plasmoids by discharging through
electrodes. Bostick wrote a paper that was titled "Plasmoids" that was
published in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN in 1957(1). He may have been the first to
apply this term to this phenomena. According to Peratt, Bostick coined the
term In this paper, he had already began to tell others about his speculation
that galaxies and the phenomena he produced were similar. He compared the
shapes and the travel of these things. He also speculated a little about the
identity of "particles." He shows pictures of different kinds of plasmoid
shapes in the article and related these to different kinds of shapes of
galaxies. Many people including Bostick, Alfven who is a physics Nobel Prize
winner, Peratt and Lerner have developed similar astronomical theories that
model the universe as plasmoids and that can be said to be derivations or
summarizations of the experimental work of W. Bostick and others. It has
become evident that atoms can be defined as plasmoids, especially as according
to the phenomena produced by Ken Shoulders. It seems that there are many
different kinds of plasmoid phenomena. The EVs that Ken Shoulders produced
and ball lightning may be classified as kinds of this general phenomena.
There is evidence that both plasmoids and ball lightning are associated with
neutrons, radioactivity, production of elements, and excess radiation, and
that they are a locus of this.
Based on the phenomena that Matsumoto produced, the traces, the pictures and
descriptions of electrodes, the pictures of stationary BL and corona-like
phenomena, the visible BL-like phenomena that he reports, and the sparks that
he observed that left traces like those produced during electrolysis and
discharge, one may categorize CF phenomena as tiny ball-lightning or
plasmoids. Important evidence is the holes and trails on and in emulsions and
electrodes that Matsumoto produced by discharging and electrolysis, the holes
in electrodes that Liaw et al. produced, the holes in electrodes that others
produced, the empty areas in electrodes that are shaped liked grains that
Matsumoto and Silver et al. produced and the half-empty grains that Matsumoto
produced, and the holes and tunnels and trails on and in electrodes that
Silver produced. The tunnels, round holes, and trail-like marks are similar
to those that are produced by ball lightning phenomena, though ball lightning
are associated with bigger effects. These tunnels, round holes, and trail-
like marks are also similar to those produced by the EV phenomena that K.
Shoulders produced. Silver and his co-authors who published a paper in the
December, 1993 issue of FUSION TECHNOLOGY have reproduced the tunnels, holes,
and trail-like markings in metals that Matsumoto produced. These tunnels,
holes, and trail-marks are evidence of the conversion and change of materials.
Important evidence that both CF phenomena and substance in general are
plasmoid phenomena is Matsumoto's experience of the production of electricity
by apparatus. I suspect that plasmoid phenomena such as electrodes and other
materials may convert to be bigger plasmoids and light and electricity. EVs
and ball lightning are known to convert to light and electricity. I think
that all substance can be identified as plasmoid phenomena.
I suspect that the round holes in electrodes that Matsumoto produced and the
round holes and tunnels that Silver produced are due to the boring of BL-like
phenomena -- the substance was converted to light, electricity or other kinds
of plasmoids, I suspect. And I suspect that the grain-shaped voids or pits
that they produced is evidence of the conversion of the grain to light or
electricity or of the production of other kinds of plasmoids, though there may
also be the distortion of the grains or the dislocation of grains by
separation. Some plasmoids are apparently able to travel through materials,
even if the plasmoids are very big. The plasmoids that Matsumoto has produced
does this, and this is major evidence to support my deductions. Matsumoto has
also shown pictures of sectioned electrodes with what seem to me to be trail-
like tracks, as if tiny BL-like phenomena traveled inside and left tracks.
Many other anomalous phenomena can be described as plasmoid phenomena. For
example, superconductivity seem to be similar to the phenomena of ball
lightning traveling though materials such as ceramics and glass without
leaving holes or visible effects, yet ball lightning may convert to an
electrical surge after touching a wire or it may convert to a bolt of
lightning. Also, sonoluminescence seems to be a phenomena of the water
converting to light and perhaps electricity.
1) W. Bostick, "Plasmoids," SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 197, 87 (October 1957).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Visor@globalcom.net
Subject: Re: Tiny Ball Lightning have been found!
Date: Mon, 08 May 95 22:21:47 PDT
Organization: GlobalCom
Lines: 27
> I have been posting articles about tiny ball lightning and plasmoids for a
while now. In a letter to the Editor in the December, 1994 issue of FUSION
TECHNOLOGY, Matsumoto reports about the observation of tiny ball lightning
in several cold fusion experiments,
>text removed<
You may be interested in an experiment that I conducted in 1982. While
stimulating water vapor (H 2 O) with a high voltage source I witnessed
something that may be relevant to your post.
I called it the production of active plasma, but you may call it tiny ball
lighting. The water vapor was in a pyrex 1000ml beaker into which electrodes
were installed.
Moments after the power was introduced a very bright -ball- of plasma appeared
in the beaker. This ball then adhered to the inside wall of the beaker. Within
seconds this -ball-melted a tiny pinhole at the point of contact. The -ball-
then
(I guess oozed is a good word) through this tiny hole. The -ball-followed a
spiral path around the room (I dove for the floor by the way) and after about
70 seconds disapeared.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Chris Morriss <CRSM@oroboros.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Tiny Ball Lightning have been found!
Date: 10 May 1995 21:02:30 +0100
Organization: Demon Internet
Lines: 18
The recent miniature ball lightning discussion took me back to my early teens
when I was an enthusiastic but illegal pirate radio operator together with a
few of my friends. One of the things we used to try to do was to develop
antenna tuning units that would manage to get very short lengths of wire to
act as a transmitting antenna. The RF voltages on the antenna were very high
and I often got very painful RF arcs to the skin of my hand, accompanied by
the unmistakable smell of roast human!
The interesting thing is that 2 or 3 times when I got an RF arc to a piece of
surrounding metalwork I saw a miniature spherical orange/yellow ball detach
itself from the arc and travel in a zig-zag path for perhaps a couple of
seconds.
As it travelled it made a sizzling noise with small 'firework sparkler' type
bits coming out of it. The ball could only have been 1 or 2mm in diameter. I
guess these things might also have been of the same form as ball lightning.
Has anybody else noticed anything like this?
--
Chris Morriss
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/bearesp.asc
+462
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
March 8, 1992
BEARESP.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Guy Resh.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The following letter from Tom Bearden relates to comments made by
Bearden in his reports on the Sweet Vacuum Triode device.
The papers are listed on KeelyNet as SWEET1 THROUGH SWEET3 and
SWEET4A, SWEET4B, SWEET4C and SWEET4D in either .ZIP or .ASC form.
********************************************************************
What follows is, finally, Mr. Beardens' reply to comments made about
his conjectures. It is dated Feb. 28, 1992...............Jon Noring
********************************************************************
February 28, 1992
Tom Bearden
2311 Big Cove Road
Huntsville, AL 35801
(205) 533-3682H Home
(205) 536-0411 FAX
Dr. Jon Noring
1312 Carlton Place
Livermore, CA 94550
Dear Jon:
Thanks for sending along the extract of comments on the papers.
Perhaps I can add a thing or two that will shed a little more light
on some of this. First, let's settle the matter of whether this is
a scam by persons after money. It isn't. There are no stock plans.
Nobody wants any "investment." No one would accept it if it were
offered. The inventor presently has a sufficient small income for
his small needs. I work every day as a senior engineer, and support
myself adequately in that fashion. I'm also retired from the U.S.
Army with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. Also, it is certainly
quite true that the burden of proof is fully upon Sweet and me.
That proof can only be achieved by independent test and
certification by agencies and scientists of impeccable credentials
and with no formal connection to the project. Until that is done,
we totally accept that what we have said will not be believed, and
should not be believed. I will say this: I have absolutely no
Page 1
control of the invention, and absolutely no say in its direction.
It is totally Sweet's invention.
If I had had my own fervent wish, formal submission for
independent testing and certification (or falsification) by the
scientific community would have been accomplished in 1987. Let it
also be noted that an inventor has agreements and/or (with other)
parties involved; he is often not legally free to do exactly as he
might wish. The best we can presently ask is that the readers keep
an open but highly skeptical mind, until such independent
certification is forthcoming. If it isn't forthcoming, then trash
the whole thing in file 13.
To try to address the gist of many of the other comments, let
me point out that we are referring to two key mathematical papers:
Whittaker 1903 as cited, and Whittaker 1904 as cited. Let me urge
all persons who commented on the lack of mathematics to please at
least study those two papers intensely. Let me summarize what they
actually show, rigorously.
In the first paper, Whittaker shows that, completely at odds
with the present scientific view, the electrostatic scalar potential
has a totally unsuspected and highly organized bidirectional EM
internal structure. It's actually composed of paired EM waves,
each going in opposite directions (and in my view, one being the
phase conjugate of the other). Further, the bidirectional pairs
are phaselocked and in a harmonic sequence. So what the potential
is actually composed of is a Fourier-type harmonic expansion,
directly coupled with its time-reversed twin set, in a one-to-one
ratio, with all the harmonic twin waves phase-locked.
Normally, in electromagnetics one just gives a magnitude to the
potential at each point and leaves it at that. However, Whittaker
shows that the potential at a point actually encompasses a
magnificent, hidden, highly organized flow of EM waves and energy
into and out of that point. Although there may be no net EM
forcefield at the point, the "hidden interior" energy flow through
the point to and from the surrounding space is filled with EM forces
and waves in dynamic motion.
This leads to a real quandary in the assumed nature of a scalar
potential, in my view: Instead of being a passive or simple scalar
sort of thing that just has a convolution magnitude and sometimes an
external gradient in that magnitude, it's a new kind of entity that
is scalar externally, with gradients between adjacent external
points, but at the same time it's totally dynamic, vectorial, and
energetically organized "inside."
"Further, it would seem to be in hidden hyperspatial EM
communication with every other point in the universe, at least in
the simple case. The basic thing, I think, is that Whittaker seems
to delocalize the notion of the potential, extending it into
hyperspace with respect to its internal EM energy flow. If someone
on the net could put that into more precise language, I'd be very
grateful.
In my picture of it, as shown by Whittaker the seemingly quite
placid scalar potential is an unsuspecting vector EM dynamo inside.
In early 1987 I simply took the Whittaker picture of the potential's
Page 2
internal bidirectional EM waves seriously, and realized that these
internal hidden EM waves didn't translate electrons in the electron
shells of atoms, but instead penetrated to the nucleus directly.
That meant that, in simply having a stress potential added to a
material, one effectively had "pumping" EM waves connected directly
to the atomic nuclei through hyperspace, bypassing the electron
shells' usual Faraday shielding interaction.
One can fairly readily build EM wave oppositions in proper
harmonic, phase-locked Whittaker fashion, and so one can make and
use an EM gradient-free potential construction entirely of
bidirectional waves. This construction is such that :
(1) a normal electron-wiggle detector instrument doesn't even
"see" it,
(2) the internal wave EM reaches directly to the nucleus and
affects it and
(3) it consists of EM "pump" waves in the nonlinear phase
conjugate mirror sense.
All that was needed then was to simply extract the standard pumped
phase conjugate mirror equations from nonlinear optics and apply
them to this "potentialized" or "Whittaker-pumped" nucleus of the
atom. That mean that the nucleus should now be a pumped phase
conjugate mirror. However, it still needs one small thing
added. Sweet did one additional thing:
he superposed a 60-Hz modulation on the envelope of the
Whittaker bidirectional waveset.
In other words, the external amplitude of the artificially
constructed stress potential was oscillated at 60 Hz. [Note that
the external amplitude of the potential is what is in our 3-space;
the internal Whittaker EM biwaves are BEYOND 3-space. The nucleus is
a hyperspatial or higher topological entity when the Whittaker
structures of its potentials are taken into account.]
Sweet personally discovered the activation procedure (which he
still holds proprietary) for causing this 60-Hz oscillation to be
taken up and self-sustained by the barium nucleus (we assume that
it's the barium nucleus involved, because it won't work with any
other kind of magnet except a barium ferrite magnet). Self-
oscillation of barium compounds is well-known in the phase conjugate
mirror optical literature. However, most of the papers I've been
able to find on self-pumping mirrors have achieved the self-pumping
only at optical frequencies.
I've not been able to find anything else at ELF self-
oscillation frequencies. I will say that, if Sweet's 6-lb unit is
not in the self-oscillation (activated, or self-pumping) condition,
you won't get a microwatt out of it, no matter what you do! If it's
in the self-oscillation condition but at essentially "normal"
nuclear potential, you will only get a few watts out, say, something
like six watts.
Sweet increased the nuclear potential and its 60-Hz
oscillation, trapping it in the barium nucleus also as part of the
activation, whereupon much greater electrical power is extractable
from the device. He also worked out the device design so that its
Page 3
objective output voltage was 120 volts, for an input voltage of 10
volts (at 33 microamps). This small 1/3 milliwatt 60 Hz input
corresponds to the signal wave in PPCM theory.
The entire device is, in my view, just a special self-pumped
phase conjugate mirror, precisely like what is already in the
standard literature, self-pumping and all. It's just self-pumped at
ELF frequencies, and in a very special manner. It is being fed by
self-oscillating hidden EM biwave (pumpwave) energy directly from
the surrounding vacuum. [The EM energy of the vacuum
intercommunicates internally through the hyperspatial Whittaker
channels of the vacuum. The gradient in the potential magnitude
represents the EM energy entering our 3-space by local scalar
interferometry.]
I also quoted a reference that shows that the local vacuum
immediately around a nucleus is structured by the nucleus and can be
considered and treated as a special sort of semiconductor. One can
visualize, then, that the 60-Hz trapped self-oscillation is between
that local semiconductor vacuum and the potentialized barium
nucleus. In other words, in the self-oscillating nuclear potential,
it is both the local vacuum and the nucleus that are oscillating, at
180 degrees phase from each other. That means that there is a
rhythmic inflow and outflow of potential (Whittaker biwaves)
envelope magnitude gradient, to and from the nucleus, exchanged to
and from the local semiconductor vacuum. Note what we're talking
about.
You've got to get the hyperspatial EM energy exchange of the
vacuum "gated" or" shifted" into our 3-space, from hyperspace.
Whittaker's 1904 paper can be interpreted as showing that (1) the
gradient in the potential represents the 3-space aspect, and (2) any
such potential gradient in 3-space is produced by scalar
interferometry (interference of the hyperspatial vector EM wave
interiors of scalar potentials.)
So Sweet's 60-Hz modulation of the nuclear potential's
amplitude represents a 3-space oscillating flow of EM vector energy,
in and out of the nucleus from the surrounding semiconductor vacuum.
If you properly introduce a signal wave to that "activated" or self-
pumped nucleus (once it's got a 3-space oscillating EM vector flow),
then by standard textbook theory you are going to get out up to all
the energy in the pump waves, coming forth from the "nucleus-mirror"
as an amplified phase conjugate replica (PCR) of the small signal
wave input.
By the standard distortion correction theorem, that amplified
PCR wave will travel back along the path taken by the signal wave.
In other words, you've got organized EM energy coming out of the
nuclei as a coherent EM wave, through the electron shells, into the
material lattice, and on out of there into the external circuit. At
that point, one simply taps onto it (e.g., by magnetic induction),
and you can extract and gate the amplified energy wherever you wish
in the external circuit. Note that the 60-Hz self-oscillation
energy comes in from the local vacuum to the nucleus, on the inflow
or "intake" cycle. If you gate some of it on out of the nucleus
externally, instead of letting it flow back to the local
semiconductor vacuum, the adjacent vacuum surrounding the
semiconductor just promptly replenishes the local vacuum potential.
Page 4
It has to do so, because of the nonlocal hyperspatial EM energy flow
in the Whittaker structure of the potential in the first place. You
can draw EM energy out of those internal EM waves in the Whittaker
structure of the potential, and the electrical charges establishing
that potential will continue to "pump out" virtual photons and
replenish the potential.
It can be seen that the potentials between the self-pumping
nuclei are self-cohering (in their internal EM) throughout the
mirror material by what is called "self-targeting," but that is
another story too long to detail here. The second (1904) Whittaker
paper I cited is also quite revealing. Here's what it shows.
Rigorously, you can replace all of classical forcefield EM with
scalar potential interferometry. Period. Note that this paper
actually incorporates the Aharonov-Bohm effect, decades before
Aharonov and Bohm's seminal 1959 paper. It also drastically extends
it, for it is dealing with macroscopic effects, not just mesoscopic.
Also, please note that scalar interferometry is not an oxymoron,in
spite of being so labeled by one eminent scientist.
If you realize that the scalar potential is totally vectorial
in its Whittaker internal composition, and comprised of multiple
EM waves, then when one interferes two scalar EM potentials, one is
simply doing multiple wave interferometry simultaneously. It's
perfectly good "wave" interferometry; it's just a whole bunch of it
at once. And the wave interference actually connects hyperspace EM
waves with 3-space EM waves. The hyperspatial EM wave interference
creates 3-space EM potential gradients (forcefields), including both
statics and dynamics. To sum up my view of the Whittaker papers,
here's what they add to physics:
(1) They add a second and completely new kind of
electromagnetics, a hidden hyperspatial EM wave
communication inside the scalar potential. Since the
magnitude of the scalar potential from a single point
charge does not reach zero until an infinite radial
distance is reached, then each point charge communicates
electromagnetically with each other point in the universe,
through the hidden Whittaker EM hyperspace channel.
It communicates via hidden (hyperspatial) EM waves that a
normal EM detector does not even see.
(2) The papers allow replacing all notions of external [3-
space] EM force fields, waves, etc. with scalar
interferometry of potentials [hyperspatial EM wave
interferometry].
(3) by adding the "internal" EM energy and its hyperspatial
"hidden variable" communication, the two papers do in fact
extend each of the three disciplines: classical EM, QM,and
general relativity.
Indeed, they force consideration of a sort of "action at a
distance," where by scalar interferometry the local vacuum
potential and the local spacetime itself are altered and interact
with the system in unexpected manners.
Since the Whittaker internal EM energy extension set is the
same in each case, it is my view that adding the Whittaker internal
Page 5
EM does unify the three extended disciplines. Note that it does not
change the three present subsets. We might also ask the following:
Can anyone show any paper in the literature, other than the
Whittaker work and the other two recent papers I cited, that
deals with this internal organized EM inside the scalar
potential? If so, I've personally been unable to find it, and
would very much appreciate the reference.
Does there exist any other paper in the literature that treats
the atomic nucleus as a pumped phase conjugate mirror? I would
very much appreciate the references, if there are any.
Are there any papers at all in the literature, where research
has been conducted in actually making the Whittaker-type of
simultaneous wave/antiwave structure as an artificial scalar
potential, in beams, and performing scalar beam interferometry
with it on materials and systems at a distance __ e.g., say at
three feet in the laboratory? If so, I'd again very much
appreciate the references.
It is my strong feeling that we must get such things looked into by
the universities and by sharp physicists and graduate students. The
Whittaker approach and the concept of using the nucleus of the atom
as a pumped phase conjugate mirror that one can externally engineer
electromagnetically, do seem to lead to some startling things on the
bench. But presently the phenomenology is so completely unknown and
unexpected that I fear we may never have a true science and
technology here unless university-level work is done on it. Indeed,
it's going to take some good theorists and some good
experimentalists both.
I might add that Sweet is incorporating the Whittaker theory
into his EM theory of the device, and I expect him to publish that
in the future for peer review and examination. His wife died
recently, however, and so that part of the effort has been setback
for a time. Sweet is a good theorist (I am not), and he is an
especially good magnetics engineer of high caliber. He is also, in
my opinion, a genius on the experimental bench.
*** He has other highly unusual EM inventions which may ***
receive more publicity in the future.
I believe that, for the quaternions, the best way to describe EM
expressed in quaternions (or better yet, in Clifford algebra) is to
note that the EM thus expressed has a higher topology. It seems
that you can get EM effects in the higher topology that a rigorous
orthodox EM analysis will never reveal or appreciate.
A very interesting reference to check in this respect __ by a
highly capable scientist, and with all the mathematics __ is T.W.
Barrett, "Tesla's nonlinear oscillator-shuttle-circuit (OSC)
theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991,p.
23-41.
Indeed, I'm attracted to the notion that my own concept of the
nucleus as a pumped phase conjugate mirror could also possibly be
expressed in terms of Barrett's OSC exposition. This is
particularly attractive because Barrett points out that in the
Page 6
higher topology the nonlinear optics effects are achievable by
circuits and devices themselves, without the presence of laser-
matter interactions as such. He also cites a document number
225395, 1988, U.S. Patent Office, where the OSC theory was
originally disclosed.
The complete mathematics for decomposition of the electrostatic
scalar potential into bidirectional EM wave sets in harmonic phase-
locked series is in E.T. Whittaker, "On the partial differential
equations of mathematical physics," Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57,
1903, p. 333-355.
The complete mathematical proof that classical EM can be
completely replaced with scalar potential interferometry is in E.T.
Whittaker, "On an expression of the electromagnetic field due to
electrons by means of two scalar potential functions," Proceedings
of the London Mathematical Society, Series 2, Vol. 1, 1904, p.
367-372.
I believe Whittaker actually orally delivered both papers in
1903. Review and commentary from the network scientists on the
two Whittaker papers, and on the significance of the Whittaker
papers or lack of it, would be most deeply appreciated.
Particularly desired would be the results of any experiments
performed in scalar potential interferometry, at a mild distance
(say, three feet) where each of the two interfering potentials is
artificially constructed of multiple phase-locked harmonics
and their true phase conjugate waves in one-to-one magnitude ratio.
We accent that at least one harmonic interval, and preferably more
than that, are essential.
Sincerely,
Tom Bearden
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 7
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/boese.asc
+82
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : BOESE.ASC | Online Date : 09/22/94 |
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following file refers to the late cryogenics genius, Harold L. Boese
(pronounced BAY-ZEE). He was a recognized expert in the field of super cold
and has been called the Father of Cryogenics. Mr. Boese died about 4 years
ago (1988) after several strokes, according to his daughter. Due to the
severity of the strokes, Mr. Boese was restricted to a wheelchair in his later
years. You might also take the file BOESE.GIF which shows a diagram of how
the system works.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Boese developed a most unique engine based on liquid nitrogen (N2) which
is inert, non-flammable and comprises about 78% of our atmosphere.
A Pinto station wagon was converted to run on his engine and proven as a
viable means of transport at extremely low cost and absolutely no pollution.
The engine uses a "turbo-expander" which functions as a heat exchanger. It
allows the liquid nitrogen a means of rapid expansion from heating due to
ambient temperatures of >30 degrees F. The "turbo-expander" is basically a
long hollow copper pipe that is either spiralled or folded in such a way as to
give the greatest surface exposure.
As the liquid nitrogen passes through this expansion tubing, the ambient heat
will cause the liquid to change to a gas through a phase change.
Liquid nitrogen expands by 980 times its volume when changing from a liquid to
a gas. Expansion means pressure which translates to power.
1 gallon = 231 cubic inches
Expansion of one gallon of Liquid Nitrogen into Nitrogen Gas
980 X 231 = 226,380 cubic inches
Once the liquid has expanded by 980 times its volume, it is fed into an off-
the-shelf AIR MOTOR. An air motor is kind of like a paddle wheel on an old
style riverboat. As compressed air is blown against the paddles, a shaft is
spun which drives whatever is attached, in this case, the transmission of a
vehicle. Boese said that only a slight modification to the air motor was
necessary to make the it run perfectly with the expanded and very cool
nitrogen gas.
Mr. Boese's daughter told me in a phone conversation that her dad had designed
and built a liquid nitrogen motor for use as a backup engine on the NASA Lunar
Rover. An electric engine WAS INTENDED as the primary with the liquid
nitrogen engine as backup. I was told the N2 engine was ACTUALLY USED in the
pictures we see of the Lunar 'buggy' bouncing across the surface because it
was smaller, less heavy because it did not have all those batteries (despite
the 1/6th earth gravity) and much more efficient.
Boese's daughter said that he was ecstatic with this success and that NASA
expressed an interest in promoting this as an excellent engine for vehicles.
That lasted until the mission was over and then they changed their tune and
refused to support any claims that a liquid nitrogen motor was actually used.
For the remainder of Boese's life, he tried to promote and market the use of
his invention as a non-polluting motive force, with no appreciable success. A
company was formed, Cryogenics Unlimited Corporation, for that purpose and
offers were being considered from Japan and Italy. As of this writing
(originally 1992), no commitment had been arranged from anyone.
The current status of the working vehicle is that one of the financial backers
has the Pinto test car in his garage. It has not worked for several years.
He has been tinkering with it to find out how to make it work but does not
have the late Mr. Boese's understanding of the process.
Liquid nitrogen was available for about 2 to 5 cents per mile back in the 70's
when the tests were being carried out. Boese claimed he had also discovered a
means of generating his own liquid nitrogen AS THE CAR WAS RUNNING, so that it
could partially or fully replenish its own fuel.
The beauty of his engine is that it could be used for many other purposes than
just running a car. It could drive a generator to produce power for your
home among other uses. There is much to yet be discovered (or RE-discovered)
with regard to this principle and it needs to be shared with the greatest
number of interested people in hopes they can or WILL do experiments that will
be shared with the network. Good luck!.........................>>> Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/brdn180.asc
+198
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
___________________________________________________________________________
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| Sysop : Jerry W. Decker | Voice : (214) 324-8741 |
| Co-Sysop : Ronald Barker | Voice : (214) 242-9346 |
| File Name : BRDN180.ASC | Online Date : 05/22/94 |
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 1031 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75149 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why has Tom Bearden given up on Phase Conjagation?
For many years, Tom Bearden (the "father" of scalar electromagnetics) has
been touting "the way" to free energy, anti-gravity, etc. This was through
the use of phase conjugate principles.
Scalar effects are produced by phase conjugating a wave by 180 degrees to
cancel out the energy, yet it produces a "stress wave" that can have
physical effects.
Many of us who study or research this field have been fans and friends of
Bearden and were puzzled by his recent change to the "degenerate conductor"
theories as specified in "The Final Secret" documents.
How can "potential" ALONE drive circuits which we KNOW require CURRENT?
The basic premise of the "Final Secret" rely on the oozing of potential
(voltage) from the inside of a conductor to the outside edge. (Is it not
intriguing that DePalma and Tewari both tap this central shaft area of
stillness for the production of electrons, just as described by Keely,
Russell and others???)
We know that current only flows over the surface of a conductor, therefore,
as the electrons reach the surface, they take a right angle turn and
"translate" into CURRENT. Only at that point does the circuit truly DRAW
POWER.
Bearden says that when you draw a current from a power source that you are
actually destroying that source. However, if you draw only potential, then
you don't affect the source in such a self-defeating way.
A collector (capacitor or inductor) is used to collect and transfer
potential from the source....before the collector "fills up" and the
potential translates to current, BOTH contacts are switched into a load,
where it instantly discharges.
The collector is then re-connected to the source until it again recharges
and the discharge process into the load repeats. The speed of this
transaction determines the total energy supplied to the load. So, if you
make it happen fast enough, you will be able to sustain that load.
To date, I am not aware of anyone publicly demonstrating or releasing
information relating to such a WORKING circuit. The closest person is Lee
Trippett with his TOD circuit. It is a current amplifier with very
peculiar properties, yet will not sustain a load.
A most interesting extension of the TOD circuit is Bert Pool's modification
into his "FireFly" circuit that will source up to 6 LEDs (see FireFly on
KeelyNet). Although it appears to be running above unity if you rely on
digital meters, it really is not.
The unique point about the Firefly is that the LED's light AFTER the
battery has been switched out of the circuit. Presumably from the motion
Page 1
of the electron wave through the wire. If this is so, then perhaps Bearden
is really onto something. However, the question is whether current is
actually being drawn. From Bert and Norm's description of the experiment,
specifically the use of amp meters to monitor the flow of current into the
wire in the first place, there is current drawn. But it is a very
interesting effect.
We are told there was a laser researcher who figured that energy could be
extracted from a properly conjugated laser cavity. He succeeded yet before
he could make the details of the process known, he was killed by short
range shotgun blasts as he left his home. The circumstances indicated
silence was the motive for the killing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We took Tom Bearden, Ken MacNeill and Bill McMurtry to dinner Friday
evening with several others in our group. I mentioned to Tom how several
folks had wondered why he had given up on phase conjugation and done this
complete shift over to the degenerate conductor idea.
Tom says he has in no way given up on phase conjugate theory but that he
has gone as far as he could with what materials and research tools he has.
So, he decided to put some of his own observations out and those resulted
in the Final Secret treatise.
The work continues on these two primary fronts (i.e. phase conjugation and
degenerate conductors), but with the main focus being on the degenerate
conductor approach. According to Tom, there was nothing behind the change,
simply that he decided to share an additional approach based on some of his
own observations and thoughts.
As of now, the next step in his own researches is the borrowing or buying
of two Calibration Standard Capacitors. Tom needs this for further work
with his recently patent applied for free energy circuit. If he can get
them, he thinks it will prove his circuit.
So, if you know where he could borrow a couple of these that you can loan
out or buy to help out, these things are about $2000 each, he would sure
appreciate it.
Phase Conjugation is still a very viable approach and one that we here at
KeelyNet believe to be right on track ABOVE everything else. This follows
the work of Keely and the entire field of music and resonance. By creating
interference patterns (constructive or destructive), you can affect energy
or mass.
The ideal free energy device would use a tuned waveplate or a geometry that
produces such a wavefront that it would "interfere" with incoming energies
to produce side effects as specified in the NEUTRAL1 Aether Spectrum.
Those side effects would be collected or otherwise discharged for practical
use. Electricity, light or heat are all quite practical using this down
conversion method.
That is one of the reasons for our interest in "Magic Squares", because
they form the geometries that can act as kaleidoscopic multipliers or
dividers of these incoming energies or simply Aether/gravity to keep it
simple. Small replicative circuits that produce large quantities of the
desired energy.
An interesting quote made by John Keely was that a tuning fork or tuned bar
will excite another fork/bar of the same frequency.
Page 2
So if you place one thousand identically tuned bars in a room, then strike
a single bar, all the bars would vibrate and thus produce AUGMENTATION of
force!
That is what we currently think Barium is doing in the Sweet VTA. That is,
it is AUGMENTING FORCE simply from the excitation of a single barium atom!
Keely also indicates that in a DIFFERENTIATED MASS (such as a "conditioned"
magnet), all of the "knotholes" or nodes of interference are removed. Once
this is done, the mass becomes essentially superconducting because of the
instant communication of force throughout it's aggregate structure.
When that occurs, change of one single molecule will instantly change ALL
OTHER MOLECULES of like composition because the aggregrate has been attuned
to a harmonious or "differentiated" condition.
The point here is that phase conjugation is extremely important to our
quest for free energy devices because it defines the practical application
of frequency to produce effects.
Another interesting point, we were told that Barium Ferrite magnets are no
longer available in the U.S. This because the government decided that
Barium has toxic affects and is thus not "safe" for the public. Isn't it
odd that Barium is also necessary for duplication of the Sweet VTA?
Cold fusion also requires an unusual substance in the form of heavy water
and shortly after the Pons/Fleischmann release of the details, the largest
heavy water manufacturer in the world went "out of business".
Correlation here?? At the ISNE conference banquet, a book was shown that
was produced by the United States Coast Guard. It was titled "From 2012"
or something like that, can't find the note on it. But the title
definitely was 2012 and it was published in the last few years by the US
Coast Guard. The perspective of the book was FROM the year 2012,
describing extant conditions.
One whole chapter was devoted to energy generation and it WAS GIVEN THAT
ZPE/VACUUM devices would be in global use!! This means the government
either HAS the technology or something big is soon to break. The whole
impetus of GM and other auto manufacturers towards electric cars is trying
to tell us something.
So, we need to get this stuff INTO PRACTICAL DEVICES and posted EVERYWHERE
in the public domain BEFORE the technology can be monopolized or sealed up
through patents by the big conglomerates!
Like Dennis Weaver said at the Banquet,
Money is like Manure, the higher you pile it, the more it stinks.
But if you SPREAD IT AROUND, IT GROWS THINGS!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
KeelyNet (214) 324-3501 is a FREE Alternative Sciences BBS
Your file contributions and financial support are much appreciated!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/brdn_ref.asc
+264
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 4, 1993
BRDN_REF.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of William Allen.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1 of 2 Complete Record
DIALOG No: 03559090 EI Monthly No: EIM9302-007519
Title: Redefinition of the energy ansatz, leading to a fundamentally
new class of nuclear interactions.
Author: Bearden, T. E.
Corporate Source: Assoc of Distinguished American Scientists, USA
Conference Title: Proceedings of the 27th Intersociety Energy
Conversion Engineering Conference
Conference Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Conference Date: 1992 Aug 3-7
Source: Energy Systems - New Technologies Proceedings of the
Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference v 4.
Publ by SAE, Warrendale, PA, USA, 929414. p 303-310
Publication Year: 1992
CODEN: PIECDE ISSN: 0146-955X ISBN: 1-56091-264-2
Language: English
Conference Number: 17321
Document Type: PA; (Conference Paper) Treatment Code: X;
(Experimental); T; (Theoretical)
Abstract: Utilizing fundamental new definitions for energy,
potential, and scalar potential, the mass of the atomic
nucleus may be considered a powerful electrostatic scalar
potential, referred to as the mass potential.
The Whittaker EM biwave structure of the scalar potential
then becomes a new and universal internal EM structure for
mass, including the atomic nucleus. This structure can be
directly manipulated electromagnetically, which allows
direct EM alteration of the mass potential, and the
nucleus itself.
This totally new class of nuclear interactions is briefly
explored, and several hypothesized mechanisms advanced for
neutralizing or processing nuclear wastes. Additional
applications are hypothesized for experimental
falsification or verification.
(Author abstract) 34 Refs.
Descriptors: *ENERGY UTILIZATION; RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL;
QUANTUM THEORY; PHOTONS; FISSION REACTIONS;
INTERFEROMETERS
Identifiers: NUCLEAR INTERACTIONS; SCALAR POTENTIALS
Page 1
EI Classification Codes: 525 (Energy Management); 932 (High
Energy, Nuclear & Plasma Physics); 622 (Radioactive Materials)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1 of 2 Complete Record
DIALOG No: 03382865 EI Monthly No: EIM9202-007260
Title: On a testable unification of electromagnetics, general
relativity, and quantum mechanics.
Author: Bearden, T. E.; Rosenthal, Walter
Corporate Source: Association of Distinguished American Scientists,
Huntsville, AL, USA
Conference Title: Proceedings of the 26th Intersociety Energy
Conversion Engineering Conference - IECEC '91
Conference Location: Boston, MA, USA Conference Date: 1991 Aug 4-9
Conference Sponsor: SAE; ANS; AIChE; IEEE; ASME; et al
Source: Proceedings of the Intersociety Energy Conversion
Engineering Conference v 4. Publ by IEEE, IEEE Service
Center, Piscataway, NJ, USA. p 487-492
Publication Year: 1991
CODEN: PIECDE ISSN: 0146-955X
Language: English
Conference Number: 15187
Document Type: PA; (Conference Paper) Treatment Code: T;
(Theoretical)
Abstract: Unrecognized for what it was, in 1903-1904 E.T. Whittaker
(W) published a fundamental, engineerable theory of
electrogravitation (EG) in two profound papers. The first
(W-1903) demonstrated a hidden bidirectional EM wave
structure in the scalar potential of vacuum, and showed
how to produce a standing scalar EM potential wave--the
same wave discovered experimentally four years earlier by
Nikola Tesla.
W-1903 is a hidden variable theory that shows how to
deterministically curve the local and/or distant spacetime
using EM. W-1904 shows that all force field EM can be
replaced by interferometry of two scalar potentials,
anticipating the Aharonov-Bohm effect by 55 years and
extending it to the engineerable macroscopic world.
W-1903 shows how to turn EM into G-potential, curve local
and/or distant spacetime, and directly engineer the
virtual particle flux of vacuum. W-1904 shows how to turn
G-potential and curvature of spacetime back into force-
field EM, even at a distance.
The papers implement Sahkarov's 1968 statement that
gravitation is not a fundamental field of nature, but a
conglomerate of other fields. Separately applied to
electromagnetics (EM), quantum mechanics (QM), and general
relativity (GR), an extended superset of each results.
The three supersets are Whittaker-unified, so that a
testable, engineerable, unified field theory is generated.
EM, QM, and GR each contained a fundamental error that
blocked unification, and these three errors are explained.
The Schroedinger potential can also be structured and
altered, indicating the direct engineering of physical
quantum change. Recently Ignatovich has pointed out this
Page 2
hidden bidirectional EM wave structure in the Schroedinger
potential, without referncing Whittaker's 1903 discovery
of the basic effect. The potential for applying the new
approach to explain the nature of mind and thought, and
providing a laboratory-testable theory for them, is
briefly noted and indicative major references cited. Some
of the possible implications for physics and biology are
pointed out. (Author abstract) 36 Refs.
Descriptors: *ELECTROMAGNETISM--*Theory; PHYSICS; QUANTUM THEORY;
RELATIVITY; MECHANICS; INTERFEROMETRY
Identifiers: ELECTROGRAVITATION; NIKOLA TESLA
EI Classification Codes: 701 (Electricity & Magnetism); 931
(Applied Physics); 601 (Mechanical Design); 901 (Engineering
Profession); 741 (Optics & Optical Devices)
2 of 2 Complete Record
DIALOG No: 03382844 EI Monthly No: EIM9202-007239
Title: Utilizing scalar electromagnetics to tap vacuum energy.
Author: Sweet, Floyd; Bearden, T. E.
Corporate Source: Associ of Distinguished American Scientists,
Huntsville, AL, USA
Conference Title: Proceedings of the 26th Intersociety Energy
Conversion Engineering Conference - IECEC '91
Conference Location: Boston, MA, USA Conference Date: 1991 Aug 4-9
Conference Sponsor: SAE; ANS; AIChE; IEEE; ASME; et al
Source: Proceedings of the Intersociety Energy Conversion
Engineering
Conference v 4. Publ by IEEE, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ,
USA. p 370-375
Publication Year: 1991
CODEN: PIECDE ISSN: 0146-955X
Language: English
Conference Number: 15187
Document Type: PA; (Conference Paper) Treatment Code: T;
(Theoretical); A;
(Applications); X; (Experimental)
Abstract: Based on E.T. Whittaker's previously unnoticed 1903-1904
papers which established a hidden bidirectional EM wave
structure in a standing forcefield free scalar potential,
a method of directly engineering the ambient potential of
the vacuum has been developed and realized experimentally.
Adding Whittaker's engineerable hidden variable theory to
classical electromagnetics, quantum mechanics, and general
relativity produces supersets of each discipline. These
supersets are joined by the common Whittaker subset,
producing a unified field theory that is engineerable and
tested.
By treating the nucleus of the atom as a pumped phase
conjugate mirror, several working model energy units
have been produced which excite and organize the local
vacuum, increase the local virtual photon flux between
local vacuum and nucleus, establish coherent self-
oscillations between the local excited vacuum and the
affected nuclei, utilize the self-oscillating standing
wave for self-pumping of the nuclei/mirrors, introduce a
very tiny signal wave to the mirrors, and output into an
extenal load circuit a powerful, amplified, time-reserved
Page 3
phase conjugate replica wave at 60 Hertz frequency and
nominal 120 volt sine wave power.
Several models have been built, ranging from 6 watts early
on to one of 5 kilkowatts. Both closed batteryless
systems with damped positive feedback and open loop
systems with battery-powered input have been successfully
built. Open loop power gains of from 5 multiplied by
10**4 to 1.5 multiplied by 10**6 have been achieved.
Antigravity experiments have also been successfully
conducted where the weight of the unit was reduced by 90%
in controlled experiments, with a signal wave input of 175
microwatts and an output of 1 kilowatt. The basic theory
of the device is briefly explained and experimental
results presented.
In the demonstration session, a videotape of one operating
open-loop unit with a 1.5 multiplied by 10**6 power gain
is planned, as is the demonstration of an actual working
model closed-loop system with a nominal rating of 500
watts, and without external power input of any kind. The
units are solid state, with no moving parts.
Each of them comprises a unique form of self-powered
vacuum triode of extraordinary gain, where the cathode
power and plate power are freely furnished by the vacuum,
and only a small grid signal need be furnished either from
an external power source or by clamped positive feedback
from the device's output. The output is negative energy,
and some of its unique characteristics are pointed out.
Implications of the experimental application of the Sweet
vacuum triode, the Bearden approach to the nucleus as a
pumped phase conjugate mirror, and the unified field
theory based on Whittaker's engineerable hidden variable
scalar EM potential theory are also briefly addressed.
(Author abstract) 26 Refs.
Descriptors: *ENERGY RESOURCES; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES; VACUUM
TECHNOLOGY; GRAVITATIONAL EFFECTS
Identifiers: ELECTROMAGNETICS; VACUUM ENERGY
EI Classification Codes: 525 (Energy Management); 701 (Electricity
& Magnetism); 633 (Vacuum Technology)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/brown4.asc
+462
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
April 9, 1993
BROWN4.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Woody Montier.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Note..
This file brought up a curious comment regarding a possible
correlation between stock market fluctuations and some kind of
planetary correspondence that could be detected by Townsend
Browns' Electrometer, an electrostatically energized device
suspended in oil.
Further information regarding this effect is taken from File :
24-185, Subject : Special Inquiry into "The Townsend Brown
Electro-Gravity Device", a Comprehensive Evaluation by the Office
of Naval Research, with accompanying documents, dated 15
September 1952.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
from the Los Angeles Times - Tuesday Morning, April 8, 1952
Flying Saucers 'Explained' by Men of
New Research University Here
Two metal-plexiglass disks suspended from a central pylon swung
through slow circles in a darkened room yesterday as spokesmen for a
new university sought to convince newsmen they have solved the
flying saucer mystery.
"We have hesitated to divulge our findings," said Mason Rose,
president of the University for Social Research, "because they read
too much like science fiction..."
Substance of the alleged discovery, credited to Inventor Townsend
Brown, is that saucers operate in a field of "electro-gravity" that
"acts like a wave with the negative pole at the top and the positive
pole at the bottom."
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Travel Like Surfboard
"The saucer travels like a surfboard on the incline of a wave that
is kept continually moving by the saucer's electro-gravitational
generator," explained Bradford Shank, third spokesman for the group
claiming knowledge "almost too sensational, too spectacular."
All three men are convinced that flying saucers are real,
"controlled by an intelligence rather than a pilot" and capable of
Page 1
speeds up to that of light - 186,000 miles a second.
Their research is new and novel, they insist, and "it is distinctly
improbable it has been duplicated anywhere in the world."
Experiments coupling electricity and gravitation that apparently go
even beyond Einstein's unified field theory.
Asked about official government study of their findings, Rose said
details had been given to "some Navy admirals" but as yet there was
no censorship. He talked guardedly about military "interest" in the
work but declined to mention specific agencies.
He spoke too about the early trials and tribulations of Marconi,
Edison and the Wright brothers. The three men said space travel
will be possible within 10 years.
At one point Shank was asked if he had a degree.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
"Superior Intelligence"
"No," he acknowledged, "I'm free of those encumbrances. That's why
I find it so easy to talk in these new terms." To all deadend
questions there was the answer, "A superior intelligence thousands
of years ahead of ours would have many answers we don't know about."
For more than four years Brown has been attempting to predict the
ups and downs of the stock market with electronic apparatus he
installed in the basement of a building on S. Spring Street. His
equipment, he said, registers small variations in sidereal or cosmic
rays which bombard the earth from outer space.
These rays, in some yet unexplained manner, are suspected of
influencing human psychology. Brown declined to say how his stock
market "barometer" has worked.
<END>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(source as noted from the title page of BROWN4.ASC on KeelyNet)
Confidential Security Information
An Investigation relative to Thomas Townsend Brown
by Willoughby M. Cady
Office of Naval Research, Pasadena
(a possible clue as to the construction of his
electrogravitic detector mechanism follows)
2.4 There has been briefly inspected a third electrical device,
purporting to be a communication equipment operating on waves
related to the electrogravitic effect. It appears that the
transmitter is simply a relaxation oscillator consisting of a high
tension DC power supply, a high (value) resistor, and a condensor
which periodically discharges through a short gap.
The receiver, shown in Figure 2, consists of two Pyranol capacitors
0-5mf, two titanium oxide capacitors 500mmf, a Brush recorder, and a
bypass capacitor 0.1mf to prevent the recorder from oscillating.
Two terminals in the circuit are charged as indicated before
reception and left floating during reception.
Page 2
The bridge of four capacitors is housed in a cabinet, indicated by a
dashed line, which forms an obviously imperfect shield against
electromagnetic radiation, when the transmitter is operated in an
adjoining room, the Brush recorder jumps with each spark. Mr. Brown
states that the effect is present, but reduced, if the 25KV
potentials are not applied.
If the Pyranols are short circuited and removed, the effect is still
reported present. No attempt has been made at conscious
electromagnetic shieldings of either the transmitter or the
receiver. In the writer's opinion the response may be the result of
a chance rectifying contact.
The relation between the communication device and the mechanical
effects which form the topic of this report (levitation) appears so
remote that no further mention will be made of the former.
Figure 2 ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿
³ ÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄ
³ ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
³ ÄÄÄÄÄ
Unshielded ³ ÄÄÄ
Enclosure--| ³
\|/ ³
³-------------------------³---------------------------³
³ ³ ³
³ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ ³
³ ³ ³ ³
³ .5mf ===== ===== .5mf ³
³ cap ³ ³ cap ³
³ ³ ³ ³
³ -25KV *ÄÄÄÄÄÄ´ ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ* +25KV ³
³ ³ ³ ³
³ ³ ³ ³
³ 500mmf ===== ===== 500mmf ³
³ ³ ³ ³
³ ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ ³
³ ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ ³
³ ÚÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄ¿ ³ ³
³ ³ Brush ³ ===== .1mf ³
³ ³ Recorder³ ³ ³
³ ÀÄÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÄÙ ³ ³
³ ÄÄÄÁÄÄÄ ÄÄÄÁÄÄÄ ³
³ ÄÄÄÄÄ ÄÄÄÄÄ ³
³ ÄÄÄ ÄÄÄ ³
³-----------------------------------------------------³
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Brown Electrometer
5.0 In a small thermostated room in the second basement of the
Banks-Huntley Building, (address censored), Los Angeles, there is a
continuing experiment which shows an extension of the basic
phenomenon. This apparatus is the Brown Electrometer.
This device is housed in an oil-filled tank of half-inch steel,
perhaps two feet in diameter and a foot deep, with a half-inch steel
cover. In the tank there is suspended a horizontal disc 12" in
diameter and one inch thick, made of six segments of pine wood
Page 3
alternating with six of marble around an 8" hub of Bakelite. The
sections are separated by 1 X 2 X 1/16 inch copper strips.
Alternate strips are grounded to a central metal stem supporting the
disc which is attached to a music-wire suspension 0.018" in diameter
and 6-3/8" long; the remaining copper strips connect to a central
iron tit at the center of the hub, which dips into a cup of mercury.
The disc is surrounded by a grounded metal shield which is attached
to the tank and which stands at a clearance of 1/2 inch above and
below the disc and 1-1/2 inch radially; this shield is centrally
perforated at the top and bottom for the suspension and the tit.
A sequencing device in a cabinet below the tank causes a half-wave
smoothed DC power supply to impress upon the mercury cup a well-
regulated negative potential of 11.1KV resulting in a leakage
current of 0.45ma. The sequencer leaves the voltage on for 30
seconds, causing the disc to rotate several degrees.
After 30 seconds, a short spark is made to jump from a point
projecting about 9 inches horizontally in air from the stem of the
disc, and perforates a rice-paper strip wound on a drum which
rotates once each day. The voltage is then turned off and the disc
returns to its relaxed position, which is recorded by a separate
spark. The cycle repeats every three minutes. The apparatus
appears to be well engineered and extremely reliable.
5.1 Mr. Brown has given attention for several years to the
variations in the deflections of this electrometer. On the spark
record the rest position is 50 units and the deflected reading is
about 80. Until about a year and a half ago (written in 1952, so
estimated mid 1950), the deflected position was about 20, but
suffered a gradual change to its present value at that time.
Aside from reversal of sign, the deflection undergoes fluctuations
whose character is less dramatic but still large, e.g. 10-50%. The
cause of these fluctuations has been sought by Mr. Brown by seeking
for correlations between them and various outside influences, such
as magnetic storms, temperature, pressure, the time of the year,
civil time, lunar time, siderial time, and the Dow-Jones average.
Only the last five correlations are claimed. Tabulated data are
available only for the year 1937. Hourly recordings throughout the
year are tabulated, for both civil and lunar time.
The writer has seen no convincing evidence that the stock market and
the automatic record are correlated, although it is claimed that a
chi-square analysis has been performed, with POSITIVE RESULTS.
(the tables are intentionally not included in this file since they
simply furnish data, if you wish a copy of the tables as taken from
the document, drop us a line here at KeelyNet)
5.3 By the foregoing sketchy analysis of the data from the Brown
Electrometer, the following conclusions are implied:
a) Through the weeks and months the data drift significantly;
b) There is NO evidence of a solar diurnal period synchronizing
with the sun, as claimed by Brown.
Page 4
c) There is NO evidence of a lunar diurnal period synchronizing
with the moon, as claimed by Brown. On the contrary, the
data appear most emphatically to deny such a period.
5.4 Two related experiments have been described by Mr. Brown which
throw light on the reason for the deflections if not on the reason
for their fluctuations.
5.4.1 In one, the sector disc was held stationary while a grounded
metal disc was suspended over it in the oil, by a torsion fibre.
When the sector disc was charged a motion of the adjacent oil was
noted by Mr. Brown. The suspended disc deflected, but not when a
glass plate was interposed between the sector disc and the suspended
disc.
5.4.2 The other related experiment concerns an oil-immersed annulus
described by Mr. Brown as 2 feet in diameter and six inches thick,
made of LEAD OXIDE (PbO) and paraffin in eight segments separated by
eight copper strips alternately charged positive and negative.
By means of a probe the potential distribution on the PbO and
parrafin surfaces was explored and it was noted that whereas the
gradient was uniform across the edges of the lead oxide sectors, the
gradient on the parrafin was steepest near the negative electrodes.
This observation means that the steepest gradients ARE ALL IN THE
SAME DIRECTION, e.g. CLOCKWISE. It was also noted that the
application of high voltage to the electrodes of this disc caused a
lively motion of the oil.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
8.4 (see paragraph 5) The disc of the Brown Electrometer shown in
Figure 5, develops a torque in response to an applied voltage. The
field in the oil is strongest in the regions A. B. C. D. where the
oil is in contact with the electrodes separating the pine sectors P
from the marble sectors M.
(circles are almost impossible to draw in ASCII, but here
goes since you really need to see the diagram - KeelyNet)
Figure 5 DA P - Pine
/-------|---------\BC M - Marble
BC \ M | P / \
/ \ __|__ / \DA
DA \ P \ / + \ / M / \
/ \ / - \ / \
| M \ / + + \/ |
| | | P |
CB |-------| - - |--------|BC
| P | + + | M |
| / \ / \ |
\ / M \ - + - / \ /
AD \ / \ ______/ \ P \AD
\ / P | M \ /
CB \________|_________/CB
AD
The Rotor of the Brown Electrometer
(note between each P and M section, the alternating charges)
Page 5
Positive ions formed at the electrodes as in a corona discharge will
produce positive space charges at the regions A. & D. while regions
B. & C. will have negative space charges. In the oil these will
cause effects analogous to the electric wind in air.
If the fields A. B. C. D. are equally strong the ion densities will
be such as to give no net torque to the disc. We will assume, on
the other hand, that the surface of the pine sectors allows a
leakage current; this will have the effect of reducing the field in
the regions A. & B. and will leave the regions C. & D. dominant in
the production of force.
The positive ions at D. will TEND TO ROTATE the disc CLOCKWISE while
the negatives will tend to rotate it counterclockwise. Since their
mobilities differ there will be a net torque in one or the other
direction, as observed.
If the chemistry of the oil or the insulating sectors changes with
the surface conductivity of the marble could become larger than that
of the pine, causing a reversal of the torque. Aside from surface
conductivity, other attributes may distinguish the marble from the
pine. For example, a net torque might be caused by the influence of
different dielectric constants from the field distribution, or if
alternate sectors all project slightly beyond the electrodes.
A net torque may result from or be influenced by the surface
conductivity of the pine and marble. If one is more conductive than
the other, the field pattern will be made unsymmetrical (see
paragraph 5.4.2 above) and the torque will be altered.
It is possible that the slow fluctuations in the Brown Electrometer
are caused by changes in the surfaces. The faster fluctuations may
be caused by particles suspended in oil, which may temporarily rest
at such points as A. or B., changing the corona there temporarily.
8.5 The experiment reported in paragraph 5.4.1, would seem to
corroborate the idea that a swirling of the oil is essential to the
operation of the electrometer. This idea is in accord with the
electric wind theory, whether or not the discussion in paragraph 8.4
is valid in detail.
8.6 It is claimed that the deflections of the electrometer show
certain periodicities. If these are real they show inadequacy of
the electric wind hypothesis. Their reality is assessed in the
crude and preliminary analysis contained in paragraph 5.2 and
summarized in paragraph 5.3.
There is no manifest solar diurnal period and no manifest lunar
diurnal period. No test has been applied for the claimed siderial
diurnal period or for the correlation with the value of financial
securities.
Neither has it been possible to determine whether the slow changes
in deflection are repeated annually as claimed; however the fact
that the deflections once annually permanently reversed direction
would seem to discourage this claim.
This reversal is attributable to changed surface conductivity of the
sectors of the disc. It is concluded that the short study
Page 6
(paragraph 5) of the readings of the Brown Electrometer does not
weaken the hypothesis that all the (censored: probably reads,
"phenomena reported by Mr. Brown") are the result of electric wind.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Note
We had a call from a Mr. Paul Stowe relating the use of lead
oxide by Brown in the construction of his "gravitator". Mr.
Stowe thinks a layered version of this lead oxide might be used
to construct a "collector" as postulated by Bearden in his paper
"The Final Secret to Free Energy" and listed on KeelyNet as
FREENRG3.ZIP.
The following refers to the thrust developed in one experiment
but the interesting point is the description of the construction
of the condenser dielectric.
"The condenser dielectric was either homogenous or laminated. In
one laminated version, 10,000 sheets of 0.001 inch lead foil were
separated by an equal number of 3 X 3" sheets of 0.0008 inch
cellulose acetate in a formica box (sounds like an orgone
accumulator to me), to make 10,000 condensers in a series
arrangement weighing 10kg."
"The acceleration exhibited by this device when suitably mounted is
claimed to have been 2.5cm per sec^ (where the symbol ^ = squared)
when the electrodes were charged, evidencing a force of 25,000 dynes
or about 25gm; the homogeneous type is stated by Mr. Brown to have
had comparable thrust. The force was usually TOWARD the positive
electrode, although in some units it was toward the negative; this
effect was attributed to a "polarization"."
"The force is stated to have been STRONGER at some time than others,
correlating with the position of the sun and moon. Data are
displayed which relate to the angular speed of a pivoted gravitator,
and which show half a dozen large fluctuations in a day; some of
these can perhaps be construed as being dips simultaneous with the
rise or setting of the sun or moon."
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 7
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/bubble1.asc
+180
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : BUBBLE1.ASC | Online Date : 12/04/94 |
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following article is from the October/November 1994 NEXUS magazine. If
you might wish to subscribe to Duncan's excellent magazine, you can get 6
issues per year for $25.00 from : NEXUS, PO BOX 177, Kempton, IL, 60946-0177.
Phone - (815) 253-6464 / FAX - (815) 253-6300
Tell them you read it on KeelyNet!
This SEMINAL paper is simply mind blowing and opens up an entirely new way to
view matter, energy and all the aetheric permutations......>>> Jerry
The file has 5 .GIF images associated with it ; BUB1A1 - BUB1A2 - BUB1B1 -
BUB1B2 and BUB2.GIF. All the files are bundled with this .ASC text as
BUBBLE1.ZIP on KeelyNet.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extracted from "Alchemy Today - Volume 2" by Chris Illert, former staff member
of Wollongong University, and a leading theoretical physicist and
mathematician. He has had numerous papers published in prestigious
international science journals.
Matter as Bubbles in the Aether
by Chris Illert
Even as recently as the 1920's, orthodox science believed in a STATIC cosmos,
until Edwin Hubble demonstrated that it was actually EXPANDING and, therefore,
must have originated long ago in some titanic 'Big Bang'.
Today, most scientists agree that the Universe is outwardly expanding and is
of finite age, born from a dramatic 'phase transition' when the "aether"
(quantum vacuum) jumped from one energy state to another, "sucking matter into
physical existence" within our universe. (1)
If one reads Leadbeater's Appendix to the 1919 edition of OCCULT CHEMISTRY
(2), or William Kingsland's THE PHYSICS OF THE SECRET DOCTRINE (1910) (3), it
is clear that occult chemists were speaking of proto-aether "Mulaprakriti"
(what Paul Davies calls "the initial false vacuum") undergoing an expansionary
phase-change to become "Koilon" (our present-day "normal quantum vacuum")
driven by "Cosmic Fohat" (the "Superforce" of Paul Davies (4)) which blew
bubbles (i.e., 'material' particles) in an infinitely dense aether.
Cosmic Fohat, a unified Superforce to start with, subsequently split into
the four presently-known natural forces: gravitation, electromagnetism, the
strong and the weak nuclear forces.
The occultists labour the point that instead of matter being solid within an
empty insubstantial aether, the aether itself is VERY DENSE (one thousand
million times denser than platinum, according to Oliver Lodge's estimate), and
matter is REALLY JUST BUBBLES-the ABSENCE OF AETHER.
The 19th century concepts underlying this occult cosmology are easily
visualized in terms of liquid in a cylinder. Fizzing can be induced if the
piston is moved; thus did Cosmic Fohat - Superforce - induce a quantum-vacuum
transition (Mulaprakriti to Koilon), releasing energy which tore the aether
apart into numerous 'subatomic particles' - BUBBLES - which we see as
substantial even though they are, in fact, THE ABSENCE OF SUBSTANCE.
Thus was matter SUCKED INTO EXISTENCE in the cosmic expansion.
Paul Davies writes that "what appears as empty space is actually a seething
ferment....of quantum activity, teeming with [ghost] VIRTUAL PARTICLES and
full of complex interactions. ....A real particle...must be always viewed
against this backdrop of frenetic activity.
When [a real particle] moves through space, it is actually swimming in a sea
of ghost particles of all varieties...entangled in a complexe melee'.... It
is important to realise that, at the quantum level of description, the vacuum
is the DOMINANT STRUCTURE. ...particles are only MINOR DISTURBANCES bubbling
up over this background sea of activity/(shades of implosion/sonoluminscence!)
Thus the 'dense' aether (quantum vacuum) is scientific dogma today, even
though it seemed the height of absurdity when Theosophists first proposed it.
But what of subatomic particles? Are they really bubbles?
In BUB1A1.GIF and BUB1A2.GIF we see electric field lines radiating through the
aether between charged particles. As the electrical charges are moved apart,
the field lines spread apart, off to infinity.
But one of the simplest kinds of 'massive' particles, a MESON, is shown in
BUB1B1.GIF and BUB1B2.GIF. The meson is actually a bubble in the aether
(quantum vacuum) and its internal ('matter') field lines are trapped within
the bubble. Indeed, if the bubble is somehow stretched, the ('matter') field
lines actually DRAW CLOSER TOGETHER! This is exactly the OPPOSITE to
'electric' field lines in the aether!
In fact, if the meson bubble stretches TOO FAR, it can DIVIDE into TWO BUBBLES
(as in BUB2.GIF). The 'charges' inside the bubbles are called quarks
(represented by black dots) and antiquarks (represented by white dots).
Instead of drawing the bubble in the aether, and all its internal field lines,
we will henceforth introduce a kind of cartoon called the "Nambu string." It
is just the field line which directly joins the quark and the antiquark INSIDE
the meson. But we can think of the Nambu string (or spring) as a kind of
elastic band which can be stretched.
If drawn too far apart, as when the meson bubble divides into two, we can
think of the Nambu string as snapping -but it can never have free ends because
field lines must BEGIN and END on 'charges' (in this case, quarks and
antiquarks).
So in order for the Nambu string to snap, a quark-antiquark pair must be
sucked into existence from out of the aether. The quark and the antiquark
CANCEL out each other (like +1 -1 = 0), so we haven't obtained something for
nothing. Figure 2 thus shows a meson (matter bubble) dividing into two - and
the simplified Nambu elastic string 'cartoon' gives us another way of viewing
the process.
One way we could stretch and divide a meson bubble would be to make it SPIN
VERY FAST; then the centripetal force would draw the quark and antiquark
APART, stretching the elastic 'string' that holds them together.
Thus, spinning 'matter bubbles' in the aether (quantum vacuum) would tend to
be elongated AND oval-shaped. They are called VECTOR MESONS and there are 37
different types of them in nature.
Non-spinning 'matter bubbles' would TEND TO BE SPHERICAL. They are called
SCALAR MESONS and there are 36 different kinds of them also in nature.
The occult chemists Besant and Leadbeater drew both kinds - vector and scalar
mesons - as their E3 state of matter, in 1895.
Footnotes:
1. Chris Illert, "Theosophical Cosmogenesis", Theosophy in Australia,
54(4):204-8, September 1990
2. A. Besant and C.W. Leadbeater, Occult Chemistry, Theosophical Publishing
House, London, 1919.
3. William Kingsland, The Physics of the Secret Doctrine, Theosophical
Publishing House, London, 1910.
4. Paul Davies, Superforce: The Search for a Grand Unified Theory of
Nature, Heinemann, 1984, and Unwin, 1985.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vanguard note..
Does this mean that we could 'create' matter or energy directly from this
virtual background of 'frenetic activity'? Is the secret then high speed
rotation? Does that mean rotation of energy, matter or a combination of
both?
Do not many devices that produce 'phenomena' ranging from anti-grav to
unidirectional thrust to overunity/free energy require some kind of spinning
matter or energy?
By creating a high speed rotation, could we then cause the separation on a
micro level of these bubbles to produce two from one? And would they
necessarily be of the same smaller size and energy density because of the
split? Or would the virtual background rush in to make them fit a density
related to their energy/elemental nature?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/bump1.asc
+132
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
February 24, 1991
BUMP1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file courtesy of Double Helix BBS at 212 865 7043.
The author failed to include his name.
This is a short paper on my (author) own view of the universe.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The universe, as we know at the present time, is composed of
many units ranging in size, for as far as we can tell, from -
infinity to +infinity.
Units like galaxies and clusters of galaxies are some of the
larger units we know of. Towards the smaller end of our knowledge
are the atoms, made up of protons, neutrons, and electrons, and
interacting with countless other particles such as neutrinos,
mesons, and baryons. Most of these particles are even smaller than
any of the components of the atom.
In fact the only limitation to the size of the particles we find
seems to be in the resolving power of our instruments and the
Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
This seemingly endless range of universal units leads us to ask,
"What is the universe made of?", "Is there any really basic element
that composes all that we know as the universe?". These questions
will be extremely hard if not impossible to answer.
My idea of the universe is quite simple, particles ARE NOT
particles at all. Einstein gave us the theory of relativity and
gave us the idea that one of the basic forces of nature; gravity;
can be explained as the curvature of spacetime around an object.
Well, what if the object, be it a planet or a Quark, is not an
object at all but simply a "bump" in spacetime? Then the curvature
of spacetime is no longer around that object, it IS that object.
(from a Keely viewpoint, this "bump" is a NODE generated from
interference patterns in the AETHER.....VANGARD)
What if all the units in the universe are composed of simple
distortions in the spacetime continuum?
All universal units have charge, but the most charged in either
direction are the subatomic particles.
Well, what if these charged particles were simply vortexes in
spacetime, the size of this vortex being proportional to the mass of
Page 1
the particle, spinning clockwise or counterclockwise depending on
the charge? (refer to the work of VICTOR SCHAUBERGER, Walter
Baumgartner, Walter Russell, John W. Keely)
This would allow for attraction between two vortexes spinning in
opposite directions (opposite charges attract), and repulsion
between vortexes spinning in the same direction (like charges
repel). Well, what about the fact that these particles CAN be
broken down into other particles?
Not a problem when you consider the behavior of eddys. When a
spinning eddy is disrupted by some other object or eddy in a
specific way, IT BREAKS UP into smaller swirling eddys, hence new
particles are created. (destructive interference and parametric
resonances.....VANGARD)
Magnetism can also be explained if you consider the fact that
many vortexes spinning in the same direction, will cause a general
flow of fluid or spacetime or whatever to flow around them.
Larger units like planets need not be single huge vortexes, but
may simply be MADE UP OF MANY SMALLER VORTEXES, I'd even go as far
as to say that THE NUCLEUS OF THE ATOM is made up of different
vortexes. (Keely says these vortexes occur in multiples of three
throughout all mass and energy manifestations....VANGARD)
Maybe in the atom there are vortexes spinning in different
directions, not just the positive direction (the protons), maybe
these other vortexes cancel out the power of some of the proton
vortexes thus making them "neutrons".
Very much like the proton in every aspect except size and
charge, neutrons are just a little heavier than the protons, this
difference is about the weight of two electrons.
I'm still thinking about this theory, I don't know enough to try
to prove it or even to know whether I missed something or not. I'm
still thinking about this theory and the nuclear forces but I like
this idea and there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with it so
I'll keep thinking about it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/caduceus.asc
+124
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
July 5, 1993
CADUCEUS.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This excellent file courtesy of David Brenneman.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Associated picture file : CADUCEUS.GIF
CADUCEUS WOUND COIL EXPERIMENTS
Certain experiments, not as carefully controlled as the above, were
carried out by independent researchers with caduceus-wound coils
(1). This was also called a "Tensor" coil by its main proponent,
Wilbert Smith.
The caduceus coil, illustrated in fig. #1, basically consists of
ordinary insulated copper wire wound in a double-helix around a
ferrite core. THIS COIL HAS REPEATEDLY BEEN FOUND TO VIOLATE
ESTABLISHED LAWS OF ELECTROMAGNETICS AND HERTZIAN WAVE THEORY WHEN A
HIGH FREQUENCY CURRENT IS INJECTED INTO IT.
First. this apparatus has zero impedance - unlike an ordinary coil.
when fed electrical energy the wire in the Tensor coil does not get
hot.
Secondly. it has infinite resonance - unlike an ordinary coil which
will resonate chiefly at its natural fundamental frequency and
weakly on the 2nd or 3rd harmonic, the Tensor coil is capable of
resonating strongly on any number of frequencies randomly spaced in
the spectrum. The signal pumped into such a coil strangely enough
cannot be quantified (detected) by standard RF (radio frequency)
detection apparatus. Many "Ham" radio operators and electronic
technicians who have used these coils, are completely baffled by
them. One radio amateur found that with two such coils, one used as
a transmitter and the other as a receiver, the second would not pick
up the signal from the first unless they were precisely aligned.
For the signal to be transmitted the alignment had to be as critical
as that of a laser beam.
CADUCEUS COIL LEVITATES
A few investigators have also reported unexpected bizarre inertial
effects in conjunction with these coils. One researcher activated
his caduceus coil with pulsed bursts of microwave frequency
whereupon it appeared to lift itself up by its own bootstraps
executing a periodic series of little hops off the ground. Why the
coil would jump like this or exhibit the other weird effects noted
Page 1
above, has no explanation under standard electromagnetic theory, and
must be attributed to the field effect produced by the unique coil
winding.
CADUCEUS COIL CHARACTERISTICS
Looking at this coil configuration carefully we see that the
oppositely wound wires of the double helix will cross each other on
the opposite sides of the core's diameter with each complete turn.
Hence, the coil will have two rows of bumps formed where the two
wires cross, the rows placed diametrically opposite one another on
the core.
Researchers claim that it is important for these crossover bumps to
lie in a straight line. Now, when the high frequency current flows
in opposite directions through the two wires, the magnetic fields
essentially cancel on the sides of the coil but on the top and
bottom where the crossovers are, the fields overlap forming on the
top magnetic vectors orientated in one direction parallel to the
coil axis, and on the bottom vectors of the same magnitude oriented
oppositely to those on top. If we observe the coil from the side we
then see that the consecutive vectors along the coil axis would form
several closed toroidal loops circulating into the ferrite core. As
we stated elsewhere, Wilbert Smith himself while experimenting with
the Tensor coil, claimed to have recorded time differential effects
between the coil field and the outer environment. This phenomenon,
as well as non-coupling of signal between coils, may arise from the
unique trapped toroidal magnetic field described above.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/cadufaze.asc
+198
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
___________________________________________________________________________
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| Sysop : Jerry W. Decker | Voice : (214) 324-8741 |
| File Name : CADUFAZE.ASC | Online Date : 05/22/94 |
| Contributed by : Joel McClain | Dir Category : ENERGY |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CADUFAZE.ASC
MAY 11, 1994
JOEL MCCLAIN
In looking at the presumed design of the Sweet VTA, (presumed as a result
of the lack of detailed information available) I have coined the term
"alternate depletion" to describe its method of attaining ZP energy.
We know from conventional transformer theory that a transformer will
reverse the phase of the primary signal in the secondary winding. This is
caused by the inverse relationship of EMF and CEMF in the core of the
transformer. Typically, the core is made of iron laminates, or some other
ferrous material. The Sweet VTA uses this principle in a manner which uses
the phase reversal to cause a cascase of energies.
The dual caduceus coils are seen as next to each other, which permits
inductive coupling, and within the field of opposing magnetic fields, which
creates a stress within the cores of the caduceus coils. At the crossover
points of each coil, the flux collapse is "assisted" by the stress field of
the core. The stress field, similar to a conventional electric generator,
oscillates the lattice structure of the copper wire, causing movement of
electrons.
Energy "stored" in the stress field is added to the energy of the original
flux collapse, because it is "pushed" in by the opposing energy of the
other caduceus coil. That is the effect of reversed phasing, as mentioned
earlier. While one crossover field is collapsing, the corresponding coil
is expanding, which adds more stress field energy than that which was
originally "displaced".
This continues to occur at each crossover point. The displacement caused
by the "push" results in am imbalance in the stress field. As the process
reverses, and the alternate coil's field collapses, it is aided by the
"push" from the expanding field of the first coil. The current induced in
the second coil is greater than the current in the first coil, because the
"push" of the first coil is composed of its original energy, plus the
"push" of the first coil.
This continues to increase the energy at each crossover point, yielding far
greater energy at the output of the coils than that which was used to begin
the process. The energy is amplified through each winding in a cascade
effect.
Core saturation, normally undesirable in a power transformer, is required
in the Sweet VTA design. The power attained will depend upon the strength
of the cores. Power will increase until the core is saturated, and no
longer able to expand energy into the magnetic field.
Why does the field collapse at each winding? This is at the heart of every
caduceus coil. When wires are laid over each other, a capacitance is
formed, and the capacitance cancels the inductance of the windings before
the crossover point. This causes field collapse into the core, and then
into the next winding.
Page 1
A Tesla coil uses the same principle, in that a frequency is applied which
is resonant at the value of LC, causing the series impedance to consist of
wire resistance only.
From this, we can see that the current which is used to excite a caduceus
coil must also be resonant relative to the length of the windings and the
amount of crossover capacitance. To determine the appropriate frequency,
the volume of the core as well as a resonating chamber must also be taken
into account. The core is essentially a resonant cavity, and you need to
apply a frequency which will cause it to resonate.
Think of the core as a hollow cylinder, to which you will apply a musical
note until it resonates. The core density is irrelevant to resonance, and
applies only when considering saturation. Try using an ordinary "tin can",
opened on one end, and apply acoustic energy until you reach resonance, and
hear the energy "ringing" back at you.
Having determined the resonant frequency of the core, then add the windings
as if they were the holes in a flute, with a crossover at each "hole". In
other words, even spacing is not going to work. Each crossover needs to be
preceded by a length of wire which is calculated based upon the PHI
relationship to resonance.
The caduceus coil has to attain aggregate resonance before it can produce
an over-unity effect, so each of the seven crossovers is a whole note on
the diatonic scale. In other words, use alternate cube and square roots of
PHI (1.618) times the length of the previous winding to determine the
length of the next winding.
In this way, every winding is both a note as well as a harmonic of another
winding.
Both coils of the Sweet VTA must be wound identically, placed side by side,
and centered in the magnetic stress field. The primary for each coil
should apply a low level signal at the resonant frequency, and the
primaries should be 180 degrees out of phase with each other to aid in the
expansion and collapse of the flux fields.
Much has been speculated about the necessity of "tuning" the magnets, using
variuos methods which have been known to cause the magnets to explode. I
don't think that this is relevant to the design. The stress field is
merely reactive to the electromagnetic energy of the coils. However, the
size of the magnets and their strength is important.
The size is necessary so as to keep the flux fields contained within the
stress field, and the strength is a factor of the power which is to be
derived from the coils.
Think of the magnetically created stress field as if it were a guitar
string, first plucked, and then tightened to the next higher note. A
strong enough "string" will be able to "play" the entire octave without
"snapping".
Given these design parameters, the alternate depletion mode can be more
easily visualized. The primary coil applies the first note at the resonant
frequency of the core. This is picked up by the tuned windings as primary
and harmonic frequencies.
The flux field expands into the alternate coil as well as into the stress
Page 2
field. The phase reversal of the second coil "pushes" energy from the
stress field into the core and windings of the first coil, whose flux
collapse "pulls" out the field of the alternate coil as it is being
energized by its primary.
Each cycle of primary current will increase the potential of energy at the
outputs of the coils. As one caduceus "inhales" the other "exhales", with
the addition of stress field energy from the opposing magnetic fields.
This will only happen at resonance, which follows strict mathematical
rules. The input signal at the primary must be kept small to avoid
overdriving the VTA, which if the core density and magnetic strength are
adequate, will cause the circuit to lose dimensional stability.
Gravity IS time IN OUR universe, and as the VTA energies cancel the
quadrupole effects of particle spin energy in the electromagnetic field,
the VTA will begin to lose relative "weight".
It becomes caught in its own "warp field", and will start to rise. Further
power applied at the primary may cause the VTA to "leave" our subjective
temporal reality, and seem to disappear.
Although it is "lost", it continues to create temporal distortions which
are detrimental to the dimensional stability and therefore to the
biological health of persons who are within the distortion field.
With only a rudimentary understanding of the principles of electricity and
music, virtually anyone can create a "time machine" or "anti-g" device in
this manner, but the costs can be high if the machine loses stability. The
universe, for its immense and vast amounts of matter and energy, is in a
delicate balanced state.
One VTA lost in hyperspace can set up a chain reaction of events which will
cause the vortical "waves of creation" to become unbalanced, resulting in
the destruction of a galaxy. Locally, we would begin to see this
manifesting itself in polar instability, as the magnetic energy of the
earth itself begins to "feed" the VTA.
To avoid creating this chain reaction of events, the primary signal must
NOT be a function of secondary output power. The amplitude of the primary
excitation current must be fixed in such a manner as to avoid overdriving
the VTA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
KeelyNet (214) 324-3501 is a FREE Alternative Sciences BBS
Your file contributions and financial support are much appreciated!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/capacitr.asc
+858
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,858 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 4, 1993
CAPACITR.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Bert Pool.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
High voltage capacitor construction, by Bert Pool.
First of all important warnings and disclaimers:
High voltage capacitors are very dangerous for several obvious
and some not-so-obvious reasons. Most experimenters know that a
capacitor can contain a significant voltage even after power has
been removed.
Discharge all capacitors with a jumper cable before working on
them. When discharging large capacitances, the jumper cable
needs a high wattage 100 ohm resistor to limit discharge current.
EVERY CAPACITOR IN A "SERIES" DESIGN TESLA CIRCUIT MUST BE
DISCHARGED SEPARATELY! SHORTING ONE CAPACITOR WILL NOT DISCHARGE
OTHER CAPACITORS IN THE CIRCUIT!
Voltages and currents available on charged capacitors can be
lethal. Use common sense. The capacitors described here are
sealed and contain mineral oil. While mineral oil is not
especially flammable, a catastrophic capacitor failure can result
in pressure buildup and explosion if construction technique does
not allow for release of pressure.
Mineral oil will burn - a catastrophic capacitor failure can also
result in the release of oil which could ignite. It is highly
suggested that experimenters keep on hand a fire extinguisher
rated for oil fires.
Also, it is suggested that oil filled capacitor banks be stood in
a metal pan large enough to contain the oil in case the capacitor
container is breached or oil is released. This pan can prevent a
mess, as well as help contain a potentially nasty fire!
I have built over a dozen oil filled high voltage capacitors, and
I have had several failures due to construction shortcuts or
material failures and I have NEVER experienced a dangerous
buildup of pressure or a fire - but I know it CAN happen and I
take measures to be prepared for such an eventuality. Many high
power Tesla coils use "power pole" transformers; these too are
Page 1
filled with oil and the same precautions for prevention of
explosion and fire apply here too.
As a high voltage experimenter, you take full responsibility for
safe construction and operation of your capacitors and other high
voltage devices.
Be safe, be careful, use common sense!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Keeping all these safety ideas in mind, presented is a method for
building home-brew polyethylene capacitors which serve very well for
Tesla coils, ZPE devices, etc.
The original design is not mine, it was conceived by Richard Hull of
the Tesla Coil Builders of Richmond (TCBOR). TCBOR has an excellent
video showing step-by-step construction of this type of capacitor.
Other available video tapes provide excellent info on Tesla coil and
Tesla magnifier construction. Richard Hull may be contacted at:
TCBOR,
7103 Hermitage Rd,
Richmond VA 23228.
The capacitor described, using .0625 inch thick polyethylene will
have a measured value of 0.0185 ufd with an a.c. working rating of
7500 volts r.m.s. A .090 inch thick polyethylene dielectric
capacitor will have a value closer to 0.010 ufd, and can be used in
Tesla coil circuits using a power source up to 15 kilovolts a.c..
As any coil builder knows, the resonant peak voltages go WAY above
the source voltages! Power LOSS in one of these caps in a Tesla
coil configuration is LESS than 0.5 watt per cap! Thus, they don't
suffer from internal r.f. losses which translate into heat failure.
A poly capacitor made with .060 poly should handle 36,000 volts d.c.
and the .090 thick poly job should easily handle 54,000 volts d.c.
These are very conservative ratings - good quality polyethylene
might handle twice these ratings.
Capacitors may be placed in series for higher voltage ratings,
parallel for more capacitance.
CAPACITOR FUNDAMENTALS:
A simple capacitor consists of two conductive plates separated by
an insulator. Capacitance is determined by the area of the
plates, the distance between them and the "dielectric constant"
of the insulator between the conducting plates.
This dielectric constant is represented by a number called "K".
On the next page is a table of materials and their "K" and their
puncture voltages taken from the "Radio Amateurs Handbook":
Page 2
MATERIAL | "K" | PUNCTURE
| | VOLTAGE PER
| | MIL
| |
=============================================================
AIR 1.0 240
BAKELITE 4.4 - 5.4 300
BAKELITE, MICA FILLED 4.7 325 - 375
FORMICA 4.6 - 4.9 450
WINDOW GLASS 7.6 - 8 200 - 250
PYREX GLASS 4.8 335
MICA 5.4 3800 - 5600
PLEXIGLASS 2.8 990
POLYETHYLENE 2.3 1200
POLYSTYRENE 2.6 500 - 700
PORCELAIN 5.1 - 5.9 40 - 100
QUARTZ 3.8 1000
TEFLON 2.1 1000 - 2000
A vacuum or air has a "K" of 1. If you put a piece of teflon
between your plates (same spacing), the capacitance will increase
2.1 times and it will handle at least 5 to 7 times as much voltage.
If you used a piece of good quality glass, the capacitance might
increase 8 times! (the voltage rating would increase only slightly).
The dielectric you choose will be determined by voltage, frequency
(if using a.c.), durability (glass breaks very easily), cost and
physical size.
MATERIALS AND SOURCES:
The capacitors we will build use polyethylene. Poly is very easy to
work with, does not break, is inexpensive, readily available, has
very good a.c. characteristics (very low loss), and has good high
voltage properties. Mica would be even better, but it is VERY
expensive and is not readily available.
Glass is o.k. as far as availability and cost goes, but it has very
high internal losses for Tesla coil use, compared to poly. Glass is
also very fragile to work with. I've made glass capacitors weighing
over 600 pounds -NEVER AGAIN! You just can't beat making capacitors
out of polyethylene.
Purchase two sheets of polyethylene sheet, 48 inches wide by 96
inches long. Each sheet will be cut lengthwise into three sheets,
each 16 inches wide. All together, you will have 6 pieces of poly
16 inches wide by 96 inches long. This is enough material to make
THREE capacitors.
The thickness of the poly sheets is determined by the voltage you
will be placing on the capacitor. You have to take into account
whether you are using d.c. or a.c.
If you are using d.c. voltage, calculate your poly thickness by
using dielectric voltage rating of 600 volts per mil (one mil = .001
inch). Some charts show that poly can handle 1200 volts per mil -
Page 3
Tesla coil experience shows that this value is NOT conservative
enough, even taking peak-to-peak values into account!
If you are using a.c., and especially with a Tesla coil, you have to
de-rate the voltage ratings on the poly or you will have capacitor
failure. For Tesla coils using input transformers from 9 kilovolts
up to 15 kilovolts, use 90 mil thick polyethylene. If your input
transformer is 7200 volts or less, you can use 60 mil poly.
Polyethylene sheeting may be purchased in Dallas from
Regal Plastics,
2365 Merrell Rd.,
Dallas TX 75229,
Phone (214) 484-0741.
Cost (8-83) is:
.0625" thick 48" x 96" = 17.50 each x 2 = $35 plus tax
.090" thick 48" x 96" = 30.00 each x 2 = $60 plus tax
I've also bought .030" inch poly from
Allied Plastics,
4111 Billy Mitchell Dr.,
Dallas, TX 75244,
Phone (214) 392-2708,
for $14.50 per sheet, not including tax.
We will make our conductive plates out of aluminum roof flashing.
You can buy a fifty foot roll of 14 inch wide aluminum roof flashing
here in the Dallas area from Home Depot for about $22 (4-93). This
is almost exactly the length you will need for three caps. The
aluminum flashing, by the way, is about 10 mils thick. The Home
Depot item identification # off my receipt is 099137150504 - $21.80
(4-93)
For a capacitor container, we will use 6 inch diameter sdr 35 PVC
pipe cut into 19 inch lengths. I got mine at
Southwestern Underground,
1696 W. Northwest Highway,
Irving TX 75014
(214) 556-0188.
It comes in 13 foot lengths, $1.25 per foot, or $16.25 + tax (2-93).
You will also need flat "glue on" pvc end caps for this pipe; $4.40
each, or $26.40 for six (enough for 3 caps). Do not get the rubber
gasketed end caps - they are not flat on the end and the seals will
not hold up while immersed in oil.
You will also need pvc primer and cement to glue the end caps to the
pvc pipe.
You will also need some 1/4 inch thick clear plexiglass sheet
scraps, each piece large enough to cut a 6 inch diameter circle.
You will need plastic tie-wrap straps about 24 inches in length, or
enough 12 inch straps to link together to form nine 24 inch long
Page 4
straps. Try to get straps that do not contain metal teeth inside
the lock of the strap.
To make connection to the aluminum plates you will need some #10
screws, washers, and nuts. You will need two split-bolt electrical
connectors to go on the top of each capacitor - Home Depot #
032076146020, $3.33 each. You will also need 3 or 4 feet of high
voltage wire to connect the split-bolt output connectors to the
aluminum plates.
You will need two inexpensive radiator drain petcocks (valves) from
Chief Auto (#852079) for $2.99 each. We will use these valves to
fill the capacitor with oil and/or attach a vacuum pump.
Finally, you need a very high quality mineral oil to fill the
capacitor. I use SnapLube-100 from Tulco Oil in Arlington Texas,
(817) 640-0051.
It comes in a five gallon re-sealable pail for $43.10, including
tax. I've never had an oil related capacitor failure using this
oil. SnapLube 100 is a highly refined non-carcinogenic oil containig
NO PCB's.
PCB's, poly carbonanted bi-phenols, are a very evil, nasty stuff
which used to be used in high voltage oils - it is not something you
want to come in contact with, especially if you ever expect to bear
healthy, normally formed children. Any way, just about any good
quality, low moisture mineral oil will work in these capacitors.
ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION:
BOTTOM PVC end caps:
Glue two 1/2 inch by 1/2 inch square pieces of plexiglass stock
three inches long across the inside bottom of the BOTTOM end
caps. Make sure these two strips are at least 1/4 inch away from
the walls of the plastic end cap! You have to allow space for
the wall of the pvc pipe to reach the bottom of the end cap.
The purpose of these spacers is to prevent the rolled capacitor
from sitting directly on the bottom pvc end cap. The space
allows any moisture in the oil to settle to the bottom of the
cap - the capacitor will sit on these plexiglass supports above
the moisture contaminated oil.
PVC case:
Cut three pieces of 6 inch diameter pvc pipe 19 inches long.
Clean the pieces with alcohol. Prime ONE end of each pipe with
pvc primer. Immediately swab bunches of pvc cement on this
bottom 3 inches of each pipe. Swab the inside walls of three
end caps which you prepared in the first step. IMMEDIATELY push
an end cap onto the glue coated end of each of the three pipes.
YOU WILL NOT GLUE A CAP ONTO THE TOP OF EACH PIPE YET - JUST THE
BOTTOMS! As you push the bottom end caps on, twist them to help
insure a good seal.
Take the remaining three end caps which will be used for the
TOPS of the capacitors. Using a saber saw cut a five inch
diameter hole in the end of each cap. This will leave a 1/2 inch
Page 5
pvc border surrounding the hole. Cut three 6 inch diameter
circles out of your 1/4 thick plexiglass stock.
Next, we will score the TOP of the plexiglass with a sharp metal
scribe in the shape if a big +, going from edge to edge. Below
is a crude picture of these two cuts. Make the scribe marks at
LEAST 1/32 inch deep.
/===========\
/\ \
Cut two scribe / \ / \
marks at right | \ / |
angles to each | \ / | <-- TOP of plexiglass
other. | / \ | capacitor cover
\ / \ /
\ / \/
\========/
*************** Important Safety Note *******************
The purpose of the scribe marks is to provide starting
places for CRACKS to occur should the capacitor fail and
excess pressure occur. The plexiglass will bow outward
and crack at the scribe marks, releasing pressure. MAKE
SURE THAT THE SCRIBE MARKS ARE ON TOP WHEN YOU INSTALL
THIS COVER!
*********************************************************
Use pvc cement and glue a 6 inch plexiglass disk over the
hole you just cut in the end of the top cap. MAKE SURE
THE SCRIBE MARKS ARE ON TOP! Do this for all three top
end caps. You just created three TOP end caps with clear
windows in the ends!
*************** Safety Notes *************************
The plexiglass will seal to the pvc, but pvc cement does
not effectively bond plexiglass to pvc. This is good!
Should the capacitor experience a pressure buildup due to
electrical failure we WANT the plexiglass to crack and
come loose and let the gasses out! The plexiglass cover
also allows us to SEE a capacitor failure - the light
from the arc shines out! The plexiglass cover serves as
at least two important safety needs! Do NOT build a
capacitor without this or some other form of over-
pressure release mechanism!
******************************************************
*** Now let all pvc cement dry for 24 hours before doing
any additional work on the pipes or end caps! See "PVC
CONTINUED" below for completion of the TOP end caps
after the glue has dried.
Aluminum:
Cut your aluminum flashing into six pieces, 14 inches
wide (natural width) by 93 inches long. Use large
scissors to make cuts. Cut all corners round (use a
fifty cent piece to mark the curves on the corners) to
reduce corona. Using a hand operated paper hole punch
(any office supply has these), punch a hole in ONE end
of EACH sheet, about 1/2 inch from the end, midway between
Page 6
the end corners. Take wet/dry sandpaper and sand all
burrs and rough edges off the flashing. Preparation of
the aluminum edges and corners is VERY important! Any
burrs or roughness will result in capacitor failure!
Attach a length of high voltage wire to the hole in the
aluminum using a wire terminal and # 10 hardware. The
wire should be about 16 inches long. Do not do anything
with the other end of the wire yet. Cut your screw off
as short as possible, very close to the nut. DO NOT GET
METAL FILINGS OR METAL DUST ON YOUR ALUMINUM FLASHING OR
POLY! METAL DEBRIS MEANS CAPACITOR DEATH!
Poly sheet:
Place sheets of newspaper on a carpeted foor. Put one of
your poly sheets down on the newspaper and clean both
sides with paper towels and alcohol. Measure a line 16
inches from the edge. Take a magic marker and draw a
line down the length of your sheet, 16 inches from the
edge. Go to the opposite edge and do the same, drawing
another line down the length of the sheet. Your poly
sheet should now be marked into THREE equal pieces, each
16" by 96". Using a box knife, carefully cut along these
lines. You will have three pieces 16" by 96" long. When
you complete these two cuts, carefully set the three
pieces aside on a clean piece of paper. Next, clean,
mark and cut your second piece of poly stock into three
pieces. It is important that the poly you use is
scratch-free and umblemished! Any imperfections can
cause capacitor failure. You now have six 16" by 96"
pieces of poly.
Assembly:
Place a 16" by 96" length of poly on your newspaper.
Place one of your aluminum sheets on top of this first
poly sheet. Align the aluminum so that you have an even
1 inch border of poly showing all the way down it's 93
inch length. Now scoot the aluminum towards the screw
end so that the aluminum hangs over the END of the poly
one inch.
Note the 1 inch overlap of
the aluminum end over poly! | |
Top
|--------------------------------------|
| |=======================================
| | |
Poly--->| | Aluminum sheet #1 O|<--hole and
| | | screw for
| | | wire
| | |
| |=======================================
Left |--------------------------------------| Right
Bottom
Place poly sheet #2 on top of the first aluminum sheet.
Align this poly exactly on top of the first poly sheet.'
Page 7
Place the final aluminum sheet on top of the second poly
sheet. The screw end should be on the far end of the
capacitor, OPPOSITE the first screw.
| | Note the 1 inch overlap of the
end of the aluminum over the poly!
Top
|--------------------------------------|
|======================================= |
| | |<- Poly sheet
Hole & -> |O Aluminum sheet #2 | |
screw | | | (poly and alum
for wire | | | sheets #1
| | | omitted
|======================================= | for clarity)
Left |--------------------------------------| Right
Bottom
You should have a capacitor sandwich consisting of, from the
bottom of the stack up, poly, aluminum, poly, and aluminum. Make
sure that the screws on the two sheets of aluminum are NOT ON THE
SAME END OF THE CAPACITOR!
Now carefully roll the capacitor up, starting on the left end.
Make the core hole in the center of the roll about 2 inches
across. Roll the capacitor up as TIGHT as possible! KEEP THE
BORDERS ON EACH SIDE OF THE ALUMINUM STRAIGHT! If your aluminum
gets too close to the edge of the capacitor, high voltage can arc
around the edge of the poly, causing catastrophic failure. I
really suggest getting a helper to help keep things lined up
straight as you roll!
Once the capacitor is rolled up, you should have a cylinder 16
inches tall and about 4.5 to 5 inches in diameter. If your
capacitor is much over 5 inches in diameter, then it won't fit
inside the PVC pipe.
Take three plastic tie-wrap straps and tie the rolled capacitor
up so that it can't unroll. The two wires should come out of the
top of the capacitor - one from the inside of the roll, one on
the outside. Place a scrap piece of poly between the head of the
screw and the underlying poly sheet so that the screw won't
puncture the underlying poly sheet.
PCV PREPERATION CONTINUED:
Carefully slide your rolled capacitor into one of the pvc
pipes, making sure the wires are "up". You should have
about a 1/2 inch space between the outside of your capacitor
and the inside wall of your pvc pipe. The capacitor will
sit on the two plexiglass spacers which keep the capacitor
1/2 inch above the bottom of the end cap (see step one).
Take two of the split-bolt connectors and set them on top of
the plexiglass window on the TOP end cap. The head of the
bolt will sit on top of the plexiglass. Place the two bolts
opposite each other, about 5 inches apart.
Page 8
/===========\
Split bolt ----> / O \
/ \ <-- 6 inch round cap with
| | 5 inch plexi window
| |
| |
\ /
Split bolt ----> \ O /
\========/
Mark the plexiglass with a marker right around the edges of
the bolt where it sits on the plexiglass. Next, clamp the
bolt in a vise. Drill two holes through the head of the
bolts. We will use two 1.5 inch long # 10 screws through
these holes to attach the bolts to the plexiglass.
Take the plexiglass window and prepare to drill holes in it.
Place a drilled split-bolt on the plexiglass where we marked
it earlier, and mark the new hole positions on the plexi.
Drill the two holes. Coat the bottom of the split bolt with
epoxy and attach the split-bolt connectors to the plexiglass
window with 1.5 inch # 10 hardware as shown below. The
epoxy is important to prevent oil leaks. Place epoxy on the
screw threads where they pass through the split bolt and
where they pass through the plexiglass:
|| || <-- SPLIT BOLTS --> || ||
|| || || ||
|| === || || === ||
====|==== < --- glop epoxy! -----> ====|====
=======|=========================================|======<--plexi
=======|=========================================|====== glass
nuts ->=== ===
| <-- SCREWS --> |
| |
Note: each split-bolt is held on with TWO sets of screws and nuts!
Next, we drill and tap two holes in the plexiglass window for
our two valves. Locate the holes for the valves as shown
below:
/===========\
Split bolt ----> / O \
/ \ <-- 6 inch round cap with
| | 5 inch plexi window
Valve holes --->| O O |
| |
\ /
Split bolt ----> \ O /
\========/
This arrangement keeps the split-bolts far apart, and the
two valves will be far enough away to prevent problems.
The holes for the valves should be slightly smaller than
the threaded portion of the valve. Be very careful tapping
the plexiglass else it will split!
Page 9
Coat the threads of the threaded end of the valves with
epoxy and screw the valves into the holes. The epoxy will
seal the threads closed to the plexiglass and will prevent
oil leaks. Do not get epoxy inside the valve itself!
Give the expoy a several minutes to dry. Hold the end cap
over the top of the capacitor. Test it to see how it fits
down over the 6 inch pvc pipe. Make sure the screws holding
the split-bolts do not come too close to the top of the
capacitor. Lift the end cap off the capacitor. The wire from
the inside of the capacitor will connect to a screw on one
split-bolt connector; the other wire from the outside of the
capacitor will connect to the OTHER split-bolt connector.
Measure and cut the wires so that they are as short as
possible, YET STILL LONG ENOUGH TO REACH THE SCREWS HOLDING
THE SPLIT-BOLTS. Crimp and solder a round terminal connector
on the end of the two capacitor wires. Attach each wire to
one of the split-bolts using another couple of #10 nuts and
washers.
Again, temporarily slide the top end cap on and check your
wires for fit. If all looks ok, it is time to glue this
puppy on!
First, open both vlaves so air can go through them. If you
forget this step, you won't be able to push the TOP down
over the pipe because of the trapped air!
Slather the outside top three inches of your pvc pipe with
primer. Coat the inside walls of the end cap with primer
too. Next, coat over the primer with lots of pvc cement.
Quickly push the cap on the pipe, twisting back and forth
to make a good seal.
Connect a vacuum pump to one of the valves with a length of
5/16 hose. While running the pump, apply additional glue
around the lip of the cap where it touches the pipe. Listen
for the hiss of air getting sucked in. If you find a leak,
add pvc cement until it stops. Now is the time to find and
fix any leaks! Once oil is introduced into the capacitor,
leaks cannot be sealed with cement - the oil will prevent
bonding!
Once you are satisfied the capacitor is leak-tight, let it
sit for at least 24 hours to allow the pvc cement to
completely dry. DO NOT PUT OIL IN A FRESHLY GLUED PIPE,
OR YOU WILL HAVE ONE HELL OF A MESS!
After the glue has completely dried, test the end caps for
complete seal one more time. DO NOT TEST FOR LEAKS BY
PRESSURIZING THE PIPE! PRESSURIZING THE PIPE CAN RESULT IN
A VERY DANGEROUS EXPLOSION SHOULD THE PLASTIC FAIL!
Once you are satisfied the plastic-to-plastic seals are good
we can charge the capacitor with oil. The easiest way to do
this is to run a 5/16 inch rubber hose from one valve down
into the 5 gallon pail of oil. Attach your vacuum pump to
the other valve. The vacuum pump will produce a condition
Page 10
of reduced pressure in the capacitor, causing the oil to
flow up the hose from the pail through the second valve
into the capacitor!
WARNING: Do allow oil to enter the vacuum pump or permanent
damage to the pump can result!
Be sure to slowly open the oil valve - the oil will want to
foam up and enter the vacuum pump. Regulate the flow of
oil so that this does not happen. Stop the flow of oil
once the poly capacitor is under about 3/4 inch of oil.
Close the oil valve completely and let the vacuum pump suck
air out between the plates of the capacitor. Again, the
oil will want to foam up from all the entrapped air, so you
will have to monitor the vacuum valve very closely to
prevent oil from foaming up and entering the vacuum pump.
After a half hour or so, most of the air will be out of the
capacitor - at least enough where you can open the vacuum
valve so that the vacuum pump is going wide open. Be aware
that you will get air bubbles coming up out of the
capacitor even if you pump from now on 'til doomsday!
You will actually suck air THROUGH microscopic channels in the
pvc pipe and end caps! Your goal is to get as much air out
of the capacitor as is practicable - usually a couple of
hours of vacuum pumping will do the job.
After the capacitor has been thoroughly pumped down, shut off
the pump, disconnect the hoses. Slowly open one of the valves
and let air into the space above the capacitor to relieve the
vacuum. Close both valves on the capacitor to prevent
additional air and moisture from entering the capacitor.
Next comes the really hard part: set the capacitor aside
for at least one week, preferrable two weeks.
***********************************************************
DO NOT ATTEMPT TO USE THE CAPACITOR IMMEDIATELY AFTER
PUMPING IT DOWN! If you do, entrapped air will cause it to
fail. I have learned this the hard way! The capacitor
needs to sit for one to two weeks to allow air to rise out
of the capacitor.
***********************************************************
To break in your capacitor do the following:
Wait the required week or two weeks (see above).
Open one or both of the valves to act as additional
pressure relief ports in case the capacitor does fail.
************ Important Safety Note **********************
Set up the capacitor in a protected outdoor area. Make
sure kids, pets, nosey neighbors, etc. cannot get shocked
from the capacitor or test transformer. It is important
that the chosen test sight be outdoors because the capacitor
Page 11
will be on high voltage for an extended period of time, and
you probably won't be around if the capacitor fails. If
the capacitor experiences a failure, and if power is not
IMMEDIATELY disconnected, there is a very real chance for
an oil fire! Better the fire burn a hole in your lawn than
your house or business to the ground!
**********************************************************
Attach a neon transformer controlled by a Variac (variable
115 volt transformer) to the capacitor. You may also use a
variable high voltage d.c. power supply. Slowly bring the
high voltage up to about 50% of the capacitor's rated
voltage. Let sit for eight hours. During this time, you
will see additional air bubble up out of the capacitor.
Air is a very real enemy! After this 8 hour time, slowly
bring the voltage up to 75% of the rated voltage. Let sit
another 8 hours. Finally bring up to rated voltage and let
sit for 30 minutes. If the capacitor is going to fail, it
will usually do so by this time.
Failure can result from poor quality or imperfect
polyethylene, insufficient poly thickness, burred aluminum
edges, oil containing moisture (1 part water in 10,000 parts
oil reduces the oil's insulation factor by 50% !!!) or
entrapped air. Insufficient border spacing around the
aluminum can also cause capacitor failure.
A properly constructed polyethylene capacitor will provide
very long service life at a very reasonable cost.
It is highly suggested that you open one of the valves on
the capacitor when using with a Tesla coil or other high
peak power source in case the capacitor should fail.
Having a valve open will vent a sudden build-up of pressure
from the gases which come from the vaporized plastic which
occurs when a capacitor fails. Close the valves whenever
the cap is NOT in use to prevent moisture in the air from
entering the capacitor.
The capacitor should be stored and transported standing
upright. If the capacitor gets turned on its side, the air
in the space above the capacitor will get back into the
layers of poly and aluminum - and you don't want to have to
go through the pump/wait process again!
Theoretically you could completely fill the capacitor with oil
- providing you left a way for the oil to expand and contract,
AND if you could build a 100% sealed PVC container. I assure
you that that is harder than one would suspect! The pvc end
caps may seep a tiny amount of oil THROUGH the plastic - pvc
is not nearly as non-permeable as we would be led to believe!
Keep the caps in a large pan to contain any oil leakage.
The pan should be large enough to contain all the oil stored
in one of the capacitors. The pan will contain leakage, and
should you have a capacitor container failure and oil fire,
the pan will contain the burning oil - definitely a plus!
Page 12
Again, remember one reason why we put a clear plexiglass
window on the top of the capacitor: it lets you see when
you have a capacitor failure! If the capacitor fails, the
high voltage arc will be visible through the clear window.
If you do have a capacitor failure, DISCONNECT POWER
IMMEDIATELY! FAILURE TO DISCONNECT POWER CAN RESULT IN A
CATASTROPHIC CAPACITOR FAILURE! DANGERS INCLUDE EXPLOSION
AND AN INTENSE OIL FIRE!
If you have questions concerning construction of these
capacitors, I may be reached through Keely Net. - Bert Pool
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 13
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/capacits.asc
+342
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,342 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : CAPACITS.ASC | Online Date : 11/18/95 |
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : Borderland | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following interesting file is from the InterNet Borderlands Archive at
http://www.asis.com/bsrf/main.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction to
DIELECTRICITY AND CAPACITANCE
by Eric Dollard
CAPACITANCE
The phenomena of capacitance is a type of electrical energy storage in the
form of a field in an enclosed space. This space is typically bounded by two
parallel metallic plates or two metallic foils on an intervening insulator or
dielectric. A nearly infinite variety of more complex structures can exhibit
capacity, as long as a difference in electric potential exists between various
areas of the structure. The oscillating coil represents one possibility as to
a capacitor of more complex form, and will be presented here.
CAPACITANCE INADEQUATELY EXPLAINED
The perception of capacitance as used today is wholly inadequate for the
proper understanding of this effect. Steinmetz mentions this in his
introductory book Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses. To quote,
"Unfortunately, to large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the
prehistoric conception of the electrostatic charge (electron) on the conductor
still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components
of the electric field, the magnetic and the dielectric, and makes the
consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated."
LINES OF FORCE AS REPRESENTATION OF DIELECTRICITY
Steinmetz continues,
"There is obviously no more sense in thinking of the capacity current as
current which charges the conductor with a quantity of electricity, than
there is of speaking of the inductance voltage as charging the conductor
with a quantity of magnetism. But the latter conception, together with
the notion of a quantity of magnetism, etc., has vanished since Faraday's
representation of the magnetic field by lines of force."
THE LAWS OF LINES OF FORCE
All the lines of magnetic force are closed upon themselves, all dielectric
lines of force terminate on conductors, but may form closed loops in
electromagnetic radiation. These represent the basic laws of lines of force.
It can be seen from these laws that any line of force cannot just end in
space.
FARADAY & LINES OF FORCE THEORY
Farady felt strongly that action at a distance is not possible thru empty
space, or in other words, "matter cannot act where it is not." He considered
space pervaded with lines of force. Almost everyone is familiar with the
patterns formed by iron filings around a magnet. These filings act as
numerous tiny compasses and orientate themselves along the lines of force
existing around the poles of the magnet. Experiment has indicated that a
magnetic field does possess a fibrous construct. By passing a coil of wire
through a strong magnetic field and listening to the coil output in
headphones, the experimenter will notice a scraping noise. J. J. Thompson
performed further experiments involving the ionization of gases that indicate
the field is not continuous but fibrous (electricity and matter, 1906).
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LINES OF FORCE
Consider the space between poles of a magnet or capacitor as full of lines of
electricforce. See Fig.1. These lines of force act as a quantity of
stretched and mutually repellent springs. Anyone who has pushed together the
like poles of two magnets has felt this springy mass. Observe Fig.2. Notice
the lines of force are more dense along AB in between poles, and that more
lines on A are facing B than are projecting outwards to infinity.
Consider the effect of the lines of force on A. These lines are in a state of
tension and pull on A. Because more re pulling on A towards B than those
pulling on A away from B, we have the phenomena of physical attraction. Now
observe Fig. 3. Notice now that the poles are like rather than unlike, more
or all lines pull A away from B; the phenomena of physical repulsion.
MASS ASSOCIATED WITH LINES OF FORCE IN MOTION
The line of force can be more clearly understood by representing it as a tube
of force or a long thin cylinder. Maxwell presented the idea that the tension
of a tube of force is representative of electric force (volts/inch), and in
addition to this tension, there is a medium through which these tubes pass.
There exists a hydrostatic pressure against this media or ether. The value of
this pressure is one half the product of dielectric and magnetic density.
Then there is a pressure at right angles to an electric tube of force. If
through the growth of a field the tubes of force spread sideways or in width,
the broadside drag through the medium represents the magnetic reaction to
growth in intensity of an electric current.
However, if a tube of force is caused to move endwise, it will glide through
the medium with little or no drag as little surface is offered. This possibly
explains why no magnetic field is associated with certain experiments
performed by Tesla involving the movement of energy with no accompanying
magnetic field.
INDUCTANCE AS AN ANALOGY TO CAPACITY
Much of the mystery surrounding the workings of capacity can be cleared by
close examination of inductance and how it can give rise to dielectric
phenomena. Inductance represents energy storage in space as a magnetic field.
The lines of force orientate themselves in close loops surrounding the axis of
current flow that has given rise to them. The large the space between this
current and its images or reflections, the more energy that can be stored in
the resulting field.
MECHANISM OF STORING ENERGY MAGNETICALLY
The process of pushing these lines or loops outward, causing them to stretch,
represents storing energy as in rubber band. A given current strength will
hold a loop of force at a given distance from conductor passing current hence
no energy movement. If the flow of current increases, energy is absorbed by
the field as the loops are then pushed outward at a corresponding velocity.
Because energy is in motion an E.M.F. must accompany the current flow in order
for it to represent power.
The magnitude of this EMF exactly corresponds to the velocity of the field.
Then if the current ceases changing in magnitude thereby becoming constant, no
EMF accompanies it, as no power is being absorbed. However, if the current
decreases and represents then a negative velocity of field as the loops
contract. Because the EMF corresponds exactly to velocity it reverses
polarity and thereby reverses power so it now moves out of the field and into
the current. Since no power is required to maintain a field, only current,
the static or stationary field, represents stored energy.
THE LIMITS OF ZERO AND INFINITY
Many interesting features of inductance manifest themselves in the two
limiting cases of trapping the energy or releasing it instantly. Since the
power supply driving the current has resistance, when it is switched off the
inductance drains its energy into this resistance that concerts it into the
form of heat.
We will assume a perfect inductor that has no self resistance. If we remove
the current supply by shorting the terminals of the inductor we have isolated
it without interrupting any current. Since the collapse of field produces EMF
this EMF will tend to manifest. However, a short circuit will not allow an
EMF to develop across it as it is zero resistance by definition.
No EMF can combine with current to form power, therefore, the energy will
remain in the field. Any attempt to collapse forces increased currents which
pushes it right back out This is one form of storage of energy.
INSTANT ENERGY RELEASE AS INFINITY
Very interesting (and dangerous) phenomena manifest themselves when the
current path is interrupted, thereby causing infinite resistance to appear.
In this case resistance is best represented by its inverse, conductance. The
conductance is then zero. Because the current vanished instantly the field
collapses at a velocity approaching that of light.
As EMF is directly related to velocity of flux, i tends towards infinity.
Very powerful effects are produced because the field is attempting to maintain
current by producing whatever EMF required. If a considerable amount of
energy exists, say several kilowatt hours* (250 KWH for lightning stroke), the
ensuing discharge can produce most profound effects and can completely destroy
inadequately protected apparatus. * The energy utilized by an average
household in the course of one day.
ANOTHER FORM OF ENERGY APPEARS
Through the rapid discharge of inductance a new force field appears that
reduces the rate of inductive EMF formation. This field is also represented
by lines of force but these are of a different nature than those of magnetism.
These lines of force are not a manifestation of current flow but of an
electric compression or tension. This tension is termed voltage or potential
difference.
DIELECTRIC ENERGY STORAGE SPATIALLY DIFFERENT THAN MAGNETIC ENERGY STORAGE
Unlike magnetism the energy is forced or compressed inwards rather than
outwards. Dielectric lines of force push inward into internal space and along
axis, rather than pushed outward broadside to axis as in the magnetic field.
Because the lines are mutually repellent certain amounts of broadside or
transverse motion can be expected but the phenomena is basically longitudinal.
This gives rise to an interesting paradox that will be noticed with capacity.
This is that the smaller the space bounded by the conducting structure the
more energy that can be stored. This is the exact opposite of magnetism.
With magnetism, the units volumes of energy can be though of as working in
parallel but the unit volumes of energy in association with dielectricity can
be thought of as working in series.
VOLTAGE IS TO DIELECTRICITY AS CURRENT IS TO MAGNETISM
With inductance the reaction to change of field is the production of voltage.
The current is proportionate to the field strength only and not velocity of
field. With capacity the field is produced not by current but voltage. This
voltage must be accompanied by current in order for power to exist. The
reaction of capacitance to change of applied force is the production of
current. The current is directly proportional to the velocity of field
strength.
When voltage increases a reaction current flows into capacitance and thereby
energy accumulates. If voltage does not change no current flows and the
capacitance stores the energy which produced the field. If the voltage
decreases then the reaction current reverses and energy flows out of the
dielectric field. As the voltage is withdrawn the compression within the
bounded space is relieved. When the energy is fully dissipated the lines of
force vanish.
AGAIN THE LIMITS ZERO AND INFINITY
Because the power supply which provided charging voltage has internal
conductance, after it is switched off the current leaking through conductance
drains the dielectric energy and converts it to heat. We will assume a
perfect capacitance having no leak conductance. If we completely disconnect
the voltage supply by open circuiting the terminals of the capacitor, no path
for current flow exists by definition of an open circuit. If the field tends
to expand it will tend towards the production of current.
However, an open circuit will not allow the flow of current as it has zero
conductance. Then any attempt towards field expansion raises the voltage
which pushes the field back inwards. Therefore, energy will remain stored in
the field. This energy can be drawn for use at any time. This is another form
of energy storage.
INSTANT ENERGY RELEASE AS INFINITY
Phenomena of enormous magnitude manifest themselves when the criteria for
voltage or potential difference is instantly disrupted, as with a short
circuit. The effect is analogous with the open circuit of inductive current.
Because the forcing voltage is instantly withdrawn the field explodes against
the bounding conductors with a velocity that may exceed light. Because the
current is directly related to the velocity of field it jumps to infinity in
its attempt to produce finite voltage across zero resistance.
If considerable energy had resided in the dielectric force field, again let us
say several KWH the resulting explosion has almost inconceivable violence and
can vaporize a conductor of substantial thickness instantly. Dielectric
discharges of great speed and energy represent one of the most unpleasant
experiences the electrical engineer encounters in practice.
ENERGY RETURNS TO MAGNETIC FORM
The powerful currents produced by the sudden expansion of a dielectric field
naturally give rise to magnetic energy. The inertia of the magnetic field
limits the rise of current to a realistic value. The capacitance dumps all
its energy back into the magnetic field and the whole process starts over
again. The inverse of the product of magnetic storage capacity and dielectric
storage capacity represents the frequency or pitch at which this energy
interchange occurs. This pitch may or may not contain overtones depending on
the extent of conductors bounding the energies.
CHARACTERISTIC IMPEDANCE AS REPRESENTATION OF PULSATION OF ENERGY FIELD
The ratio of magnetic storage ability to that of the dielectric is called the
characteristic impedance. This gives the ratio of maximum voltage to maximum
current in the oscillatory structure. However, as the magnetic energy storage
is outward and the dielectric storage is inward the total or double energy
field pulsates in shape or size. The axis of this pulsation of force is the
impedance of the system displaying oscillations and pulsation occurs at the
frequency of oscillation.
ENERGY INTO MATTER
As the voltage or impedance is increased the emphasis is on the inward flux.
If the impedance is high and rate of change is fast enough (perfect overtone
series), it would seem possible the compression of the energy would transform
it into matter and the reconversion of this matter into energy may or may not
synchronize with the cycle of oscillation. This is what may be considered
supercapacitance, that is, stable long term conversion into matter.
MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE
The misconception that capacitance is the result of accumulating electrons has
seriously distorted our view of dielectric phenomena. Also the theory of the
velocity of light as a limit of energy flow, while adequate for magnetic force
and material velocity, limits our ability to visualize or understand certain
possibilities in electric phenomena.
The true workings of free space capacitance can be best illustrated by the
following example. It has been previously stated that dielectric lines of
force must terminate on conductors. No line of force can end in space. If we
take any conductor and remove it to the most remote portion of the universe,
no lines of force can extend from this electrode to other conductors.
It can have no free space capacity, regardless of the size of the electrode,
therefore it can store no energy. This indicates that the free space
capacitance of an object is the sum mutual capacity of it to all the
conducting objects of the universe.
FREE SPACE INDUCTANCE IS INFINITE
Steinmetz in his book on the general or unified behavior of electricity The
Theory and Calculation of Transient Electric Phenomena and Oscillation, points
out that the inductance of any unit length of an isolated filamentary
conductor must be infinite. Because no image currents exist to contain the
magnetic field it can grow to infinite size. This large quantity of energy
cannot be quickly retrieved due to the finite velocity of propagation of the
magnetic field. This gives a non reactive or energy component to the
inductance which is called electromagnetic radiation.
WORK OF TESLA, STEINMETZ AND FARADAY
In the aforementioned books of Steinmetz he develops some rather unique
equations for capacity. Tesla devoted an enormous portion of his efforts to
dielectric phenomena and made numerous remarkable discoveries in this area.
Much of this work is yet to be fully uncovered. It is my contention that the
phenomena of dielectricity is wide open for profound discovery. It is ironic
that we have abandoned the lines of force concept associated with a phenomena
measure in the units called farads after Farady, whose insight into forces and
fields has led to the possibility of visualization of the electrical
phenomena.
QUESTION AS TO THE VELOCITY OF DIELECTRIC FLUX
It has been stated that all magnetic lines of force must be closed upon
themselves, and that all dielectric lines of force must terminate upon a
conducting surface. It can be inferred from these two basic laws that no line
of force can terminate in free space. This created an interesting question as
to the state of dielectric flux lines before the field has had time to
propagate to the neutral conductor. During this time it would seem that the
lines of force, not having reached the distant neutral conductor would end in
space at their advancing wave front.
It could be concluded that either the lines of force propagate instantly or
always exists and are modified or conjugate space exists within the same
boundaries as ordinary space. The properties of lines of force within this
conjugate space may not obey the laws of normally conceived space.
IMPORTANT REFERENCE MATERIAL
1. Electricity and Matter, J. J. Thompson, New York, l906, Scribner's Sons,
and l904, Yale University.
2. Elementary Lecture on Electric Discharges, Waves, and Impulses and other
Transients, C. P. Steinmetz, second edition, 1914, McGraw-Hill.
3. Theory and Calculation of Transient Electric Phenomena and Oscillations,
C. P. Steinmetz, third edition, l920, McGraw-Hill. Section III
Transients in Space, Chapter VIII, Velocity of Propagation of Electric
Field.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/carman.asc
+222
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : CARMAN.ASC | Online Date : 10/06/91 |
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| WWW Mirror - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The gist of this file was originally typed up in 1991 with the intent of being
placed on KeelyNet then. I found it in an alternate directory recently and
decided to update and post it. The file is shared with KeelyNet courtesy of
Tom Brown, Director of Borderland Sciences. The Journal of Borderland
Sciences has been in active publication since 1945. Tom and Alison have
recently moved (1995) to New Zealand with Michael Theroux taking over the
operation of Borderland. The journal is an excellent quarterly magazine with
subscribers worldwide. If you might like to subscribe, please mention that
you heard of Borderland from KeelyNet. Yearly subscriptions are $25.
Name : Borderland Research Voice : (707) 825-7733
Contact : Michael Theroux FAX : (707) 825-7779
Address : PO BOX 220 BBS : (707) 825-7779
City : Bayside, CA 95524 e-mail : BSRF@northcoast.com
From Borderland Sciences Research Foundation, Jan/Feb 1978.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reprinted from the Boston Herald American, Monday, April 25, 1977.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Saving Invention being Suppressed by Snafu
by Scott Burns
While the Carter administration promotes its plan to turn a mountain of new
taxes into a molehill of energy savings, the real solution to the energy
crisis - new technology - may be languishing at our beloved Energy
Research and Development Administration.
Testifying before the Senate Sub-Committe on Energy Research and Development
on April 4, Vincent Carman, inventor of the Inertial Storage Transmission,
recounted a mind-boggling tale of resistance and delay at ERDA, the agency
charged with solving the energy crisis.
Here, in brief, is what he said :
"Over six months ago, the National Bureau of Standards completed an
extensive evaluation of a revolutionary automobile transmission that they
reported could reduce our nation's oil imports by 50 percent. This system
can reduce vehicular air pollution in our cities by 75 percent.
This OPERATIONAL SYSTEM was publicly demonstrated 18 months ago. The
system is simple, uses OFF-THE-SHELF, commercially available components.
In the two years that ERDA has been aware of the system they have given the
concept no serious attention."
It now appears they are attempting to suppress it.
Unlike Dr. Ilok's solution to the energy crisis (reported here April 17-20),
Carman's invention EXISTS, has been publicly demonstrated, and requires NO
research and development investment from ERDA.
Carman merely wants ERDA to get OUT OF THE WAY and make it possible for him to
install his invention on some U.S. Post Office trucks so that he might further
demonstrate its utility and potential for energy savings.
But ERDA won't get out of the way. Instead, Carman says they have suppressed
the National Bureau of Standards evaluation of his invention, refusing to
release it to other agencies.
They've done this because the NBS report recommends Carman's invention for
funding, a singular achievement since only 22 of some 4300 submissions have
enjoyed positive recommendation from NBS.
ERDA's own, one-and-a-half page report, issued later, rejects the invention,
saying that it is too expensive, won't achieve the savings the inventor had
DEMONSTRATED AND DOCUMENTED, and won't be accepted by the automobile industry.
ERDA is circulating its own report and has not, to date, released the NBS
report, damaging both Carman's credibility and his ability to attract the
interest of other government agencies or private industry.
What is the IST System?
Carman's Inertial Storage Transmission works by storing oil under high
pressure.
This means that all the power output from an engine can be used so that in
city driving where car engines idle much of the time, a car could run USING
the STORED POWER of its engine and the engine's power WOULD NEVER BE LOST IN
WASTEFUL IDLING. (stored in the form of compressed oil)
As a consequence, the engine could be OFF 80 PERCENT OF THE TIME, REDUCING
POLLUTION by 75 PERCENT and FUEL CONSUMPTION by 50 PERCENT!
Estimates indicate the IST could save some 35 BILLION GALLONS A YEAR, cutting
our imported oil IN HALF.
Carman didn't hear from ERDA for six months after NBS's positive report was
issued and then only after ERDA was pressured by Mark Hatfield and Congressman
Robert Duncan. Clearly, ERDA would like the matter to quietly disappear.
Now let's consider the quality of the two reports :
ERDA's negative report was produced in 42 days BY ONE INDIVIDUAL WITHOUT
BENEFIT OF ANY PHYSICAL TESTING.
The uncirculated NBS report was based on 10 months of work and
contributions from a variety of sources, many of them here in
Massachusetts.
The Department of Transportation Systems Center in Cambridge, contributed
to the evaluation as did the Mechanical Engineering Department at the
University of Massachusetts, the Boston Police Department, the MBTA and
Yellow Cab Corporation.
Nonetheless, ERDA continues to circulate its own report rather than the NBS
report.
One possible reason is that ERDA is committed to another technology, the
flywheel energy storage system. To date, they have spent some $200,000 on
a feasibility study of such systems. The study determined it would take
three years and 4.5 million to get a prototype on the road,
something Carman ACHIEVED IN LESS THAN A YEAR WITH $4000.
The Department of Transportation also has an interest in flywheel systems
and has spent five years and $300,000 trying to convert a Ford Pinto into
a flywheel storage car. Together, the two agencies have a contract to
supply flywheel vehicles to the city of New York. (Birds of a feather?)
Meanwhile, the Postal Service also reports it has contracts for flywheel
vehicles and therefore can't put up funds for demonstration of the IST
system.
ERDA, in other words, has neatly closed out a competing technology because
the agency is in a position to exercise MONOPOLISTIC CONTROL over the flow
of both money and ideas in new energy technologies.
In an eloquent close to his testimony before the Senate sub-committee,
Carman said ;
"The energy problem has a solution and it is quite probable that a large
part of that solution can come from the little guy.
Two men in an upstairs room gave us the telephone, and a couple of bicycle
mechanics brought aviation to the world. It is sometimes said that the day
of the individual inventor is over, but nobody told Robert Goddard that,
and he invented the ballistic missle in his backyard.
In the last few years, while the greatest scientific organizations in both
the United States and Russia struggled with the problem of generating
electric power from fusion, a young man in California in his own lab
produced the first major breakthrough."
Now that we've seen Carter's energy plan, we know that Carter has chosen
taxation, not technology, as the means of "solving" the energy crisis.
The money we all start paying in federal gasoline taxes will soon help ERDA
expand its research efforts, - WHILE IT IGNORES SOLUTIONS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vanguard note...
As you can see from the experience of Mr. Carman, all the big corporations and
government agencies, with their access to huge laboratories and technical
resources, quake in their shoes that some independent lone inventor will
discover in his garage what they COULD NOT DISCOVER WITH ALL THEIR RESOURCES.
How could they justify their existence and all their accumulated knowledge
without staying far in advance of what any single person or small, LESS
ENDOWED group could do?
What would their stockholders and bosses say?
With regard to Carman, I regret the article does not provide EXPLICIT
directions as to what he is doing beyond using the oil pressure. From reading
the article, it appears the engine is shut down while in an idling condition,
if that's the case, there might be some reticence in turning off your engine
at every stop light and turning it back on when it is time to roll, even
though this would be an 'automatic' process as part of the system.
Keep at it folks...read, talk to others, EXPERIMENT, try your hunches....the
past shows that you DON'T NEED TO BE RICH or have tons of equipment to
experiment and achieve success. And be sure to share it with as many people
as you can. Don't worry about 'evaluation' or a stamp of approval, by god, if
it works as claimed, the market will determine its success. Build it, sell it
to your friends, expand, build and sell more, use networks and get the thing
used in a practical sense. Do what the Russians are doing with the very high
efficiency YUSMAR heat generations system.
At a recent conference on low level energy reactions, one of the Chief
Scientists for the DOE (Thomas Ward) was there. Everyone complained that no
funding was available for research into 'transmutation' using low level
energies.
The ramifications include not just transmutation of one element to another,
but the conversion of radioactive elements into STABLE ELEMENTS WHICH HAS BEEN
DONE on a reliable basis. Dr. Robert Monti of Canada can take a radioactive
element and over a 3 day period, convert it to a stable element with no trace
of radioactivity. Nevertheless, doors are shut when proposals of this nature
are presented because the common 'belief' is it CAN'T BE DONE.
As in the Carman device, no funding was even considered for what had every
indication of being a WORKING TECHNOLOGY, not just investigation of an
anomaly, erratic unexplained phenomena or evaluation. Almost 500 million each
year is funneled towards 'hot fusion' research WITH NO SUCCESS. Yet NOT ONE
PENNY is spent for 'cold fusion' or overunity investigations because most
academia 'believes' cold fusion is a mistake, unproven or 'can't happen.'
So what can we do in our own small way to make some kind of advances? Formal
science requires large sums of money to do experiments, but as Carman noted
above, many important inventions have been made by garage and table type
experimenters, not by large corporate groups. Forget about large scale
devices, stick with table top demonstrations.
Wait until one of us or a small team comes up with practical, affordable and
publicly available free energy or antigravity technology. Don't you think
that the logic will flow something like this :
If these guys discovered this with such limited resources,
WHAT COULD THEY DO IF PROPERLY SPONSORED???
>>> Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/carnot.asc
+82
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
_____________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : CARNOT.ASC | Online Date : 10/28/94 |
| Contributed by : William Price | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following refers to a new heat to mechanical energy convertor which has
overunity properties that defy the Carnot thermodynamic cycle.
_____________________________________________________________________________
alt.sci.physics.new-theories #7009 [1]
Date: Sun Oct 23 08:50:00 PDT 1994
From: harti@shb.contrib.de (Stefan Hartmann)
Newsgroups: alt.paranet.science,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,alt.sci.physics.
+ plutonium,sci.bio,sci.physics,sci.physics.fusion,sci.physics.
+ particle
[1] Carnot is dead ! Schaeffer disproves 2nd "law" !
X-Newsreader: XP v3.02 R/A2148
X-Charset: ISO-8859-1
Lines: 60
Well, I just received the latest news about the research done over here at the
Workshop for Decentral Energy Research in Berlin, Germany.
The physician, Mr. Bernhard Schaefer and his team of researchers, together
with the Russian inventor Serogodski have successfully patented their new
machine design, which works as a heat to mechanical energy converter.
It does not need a "cold pole", it just converts the surounding heat into
useful mechanical work.
It works via "retrograde condensation" and uses a gas-mixture of 2 working
mediums, N2 and C4H10.
The German patent office issued the patent number:
42 44 016
Try to get it and read it. It is very interesting.
Bernhard Schaeffer has worked over a 30 year time period on these limits of
the 2nd thermodynamic sentence and finaly has won the battle.
With his latest measurements he now can prove, that with the retrograde
condensation with these gas-mixtures he can get efficiencies, which are far
higher, than Carnot would predict.
These measurements are done very precisely and it was invested a huge amount
of money and time to build all the technical equipment to measure the effect
at the right pressure and temperature.
This invention will change the world. Now endless "free energy" is possible to
use. You just pay for the machine and it will produce pollution free clean
electrical energy, just by converting the heat of the surrounding into
electrical energy. Just think about a refrigirator, which produces electrical
energy, instead of consuming it !
You will soon hear more about this fantastic invention ! The future of mankind
looks bright !
If you want to have more info on this whole subject, please write to the
company which finances all the work:
Doekowa GmbH & Co KG
attn: Dr. Hans Wilh. Colsman
45241 Essen, Germany
They will send you an information paper of all the measurements and the future
plans. If you are an investor, which wants to license the machine design to
build inside your country you are welcome to contact them as well.
So far my latest information. Sorry, they don't yet have email access, so you
have to write to them by snail mail. I will keep you updated on all the
latest news about their machine design.
Regards, Stefan.
## CrossPoint v3.02 ##
End of article 7009 (of 7009)
_____________________________________________________________________________
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/casgrav1.asc
+264
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 26, 1991
CASGRAV1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This EXCELLENT file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of
Darrell Moffitt.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
A Derivation of Newton's Constant via Casimir Potentials
and Quantum Fluctuation Effects in Vacuum
Darrell Moffitt
In recent times, numerous authors have explored the possibility that
zero-point energy (z.p.e.), the observable consequence of quantum
fluctuations in vacuum, may in some manner give rise to the
phenomena called gravity. (1-4)
Various arguments have been invoked, some suggesting that symmetry
breaking effects similar to those observed in the Standard Model
play a dominant role. (1-3)
Other authors suggest that the feebleness of gravitational coupling
reflects a natural cut-off in the frequency of electromagnetic waves
composing the vacuum. (4) These arguments, while useful, fail to
generate a straightforward derivation of Newton's constant. Be that
as it may, there are mechanisms which produce close approximations.
Two of these approximations derive from arguments based on Casimir
potentials. (5) Both approximations make use of Casimir's polar-
polar potential,
((h/2ãc^5)(w^6/6)(P1*P2)(1/R)),
describing the interaction between two polarizable systems.
The frequency cut-off is determined naturally by the dimensions of
the systems, w=(c/r); the volume polarizations (P1, P2) are
determined similarly. The factor of (1/6) indicates an integral over
w^5.
One form of Newton's constant, related elsewhere (6), produces a
value within one percent of experiment by relating the ground-state
orbital frequency of hydrogen to a cubic electron density in the
polar-polar potential, thus arriving at the expression,
G = ((hc/ã m#^2) (à^3/4ã)^6),
Page 1
where "m#" is the electron mass; "h" is Planck's constant; "c" is
the speed of light, and "à" is the electromagnetic coupling
constant.
A more accurate derivation will reveal the relation of zero-point
processes to the appearance of a universal effect, while avoiding
reference to a specific mass scale. This derivation makes use of two
Casimir expressions, the polar-polar potential quoted before, and
the wall-wall potential, (hc/2ã r^4), with an explicit form, to
first order,
F = (ãhc/480),
also known as the zero-point constant.
A curious feature of this second derivation is dual frequency
dependence, the terms of which originate in well measured attributes
of the quantum vacuum.
Known by a different interpretation as the vacuum conductivity, the
first frequency,
(å=2.65441873*10^-3/t),
is the product of c and î, the vacuum dielectric constant. The
second frequency term is the Lamb shift, w&, which measures the
effect of z.p.e. on the orbit of an electron in the ground state of
free hydrogen.
Its numeric value, by latest measurement, is
(2ã*1.0578458*10^9/t).
One may better understand the role of these two frequency scales by
conducting a dimensional analysis of Newton's constant, which can be
interpreted as
((d/t^2)(1/d1d2)),
the ratio between a volume density oscillation, (d/t^2), and two
interacting volume densities, (d1, d2). Thus, what is sought here is
some form of vacuum source density oscillation and vacuum source
density.
When one considers the vacuum conductivity to be a plasma frequency,
and divides the zero-point constant by the square of this frequency,
a small but significant virtual density factor results,
(F/(å^2*(cm)^6))= d0
with a numeric value of
(1.845214465*10^-13 (gm/cm^3)).
Virtual density oscillations (v.d.o.s) in the quantum vacuum are a
contentious issue, as no acoustic analog process has ever been
directly observed.
A simple way to conceive of such oscillations is to consider the
Page 2
vacuum polarization effects of sub-atomic particles. In this light,
a v.d.o. represents an interaction of polarization and virtual
particle currents averaged over a finite region of space.
Consider, for example, a characteristic density oscillation defined
by the core term of Casimir's polar-polar potential,
((h/2ãc^5)(4àw&/ã)^6),
numerically equal to
(2.41567929*10^-33 (gm/cm^3*t^2)).
According to the dimensional analysis of Newton's constant performed
earlier, an expression for gravitational coupling could be written
as the ratio of this density oscillation and the virtual plasma
density given above:
((h/2ãc^5)(4àw&/ã)^6/(d0)^2),
yielding the quantity
(7.09488846*10^-8 (cm^3/gm t^2)),
slightly in excess of the measured value of Newtonian gravity. A
correction factor, based in part on the zero-point constant
derivation, produces the near approximation:
G = ((h/2ãc^5)(4àw&/ã)^6/(d0)^2)*(1+(ã^2/240))^-1.5
*(1+16à^2)^-1*(1+(à^2/2)),
with a numeric value of (6.67319759*10^-8 (cm^3/gm t^2)).
This may be favorably compared to the experimental value of Newton's
constant,
(6.6732....*10^-8 (cm^3/gm t^2)).
Rigorous treatment of the derivation above requires a deep and
prolonged evaluation by quantum electrodynamic techniques and their
younger sibling, stochastic electrodynamics.
Particular attention must be given to the general nature of v.d.o.s
and their relation to pair-formation and vacuum polarization. One
must also question the origin of the reduction factor in the Lamb
shift, (4à/ã), which might be construed as a secondary result of
virtual pair orbits.
The answer to these, and similar questions, is by no means clear.
The larger question to answer, "why" there are physical constants,
is likely to find its answer in the rich structure of the quantum
vacuum itself, the "nothing" which more and more appears to be the
source of everything we term "the universe".
Page 3
Appendix
All quantities used in this paper are taken from p. 700, " Quantum
Electrodynamics", the "Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy
Physics", Vol. 7, 1987, edited by T. Kinoshita, World Scientific.
A partial list of these quantities is quoted below.
m# electron mass 9.1093897(54)*10^-31 kg
e electron charge 1.60217733(49)*10^-19 C
h/2ã Planck constant/2ã 1.05457266(63)*10^-34 Js
à^-1 inverse fine structure 1.37059895(61)*10^2
constant
c speed of light 2.99792458*10^8 ms^-1
Bibliography
1. A. Zee, "Broken-Symmetric Theory of Gravity", Phys. Rev. Lett.,
42, 7, 1979
2. A. Zee, "Horizon Problem and the Broken-Symmetric Theory of
Gravity", Phys. Rev. Lett., 44, 11, 1980
3. A. Zee, "Spontaneously generated gravity", Phys. Rev. D, 23, 4,
1981
4. H.E. Puthoff, "Gravity as a zero-point fluctuation force", Phys.
Rev. A, 39, 5, 1989
5. Larry Spruch, "Retarded, or Casimir, long-range potentials",
Physics Today, 11/86
6. Darrell Moffitt, "CPEDOG", KeelyNet file, 9/91
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/chernet1.asc
+241
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : CHERNET1.ASC | Online Date : 12/21/95 |
| Contributed by : Bill Beaty | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
This file is from Bill Beaty's website as listed above. See PLASMAFE.ASC and
FROLOV1.ASC on KeelyNet for another version of this report.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[I have no idea where this comes from. The first page is headed 03NTO-
890717CM04, and the last page (of 4) is footed "(APN)"]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VACUUM ENERGY: A BREAKTHROUGH?
By Andrei Samokhin
The model of a plasma generator which can convert physical-vacuum energy into
electricity has been developed under Prof. Alexander CHERNETSKI at the Moscow
Georgi Plekhanov Institute of the National Economy. Such generators could lay
the groundwork for the future environmentally-benign power industry.
Classical physics cannot explain what happens when a plasma discharger placed
in the Chernetski circuit is started: for no apparent reason the ammeter
pointer shows triple strength-of-current increase [sic] and energy output is
several times above input. The plant's efficiency is much more than 1.
No magic is intended. Additional energy outputs at specific plasma discharges
are fixed in several independent expert reports by the Lenin All-Union
Institute of Electrical Engineering. This effect has been checked by
different methods.
Whence this mysterious energy?
Self-generating discharge
-------------------------
Prof Chernetski, the author of the first ever study paper on plasma-
diagnostics equipment (he has been in this field fro 40 years now) and 20
inventions, never knew what he was probing into specific unstable plasma
states at strong-current discharges could have led to.
In the early 70s, he and fellow-researcher Yuri Galkin worked on a basically
new type of high-frequency plasma generator which could at high power do
without unwieldy energy converters. In one test, they discovered input-output
energy gap. [sic]
"I knew electron drift begins in plasma and sought to deduce a combination
of variables in which fluctuating plasma instability emerged in
discharge,"
Chernetski says.
"Gas discharge was meant to serve as a powerful stimulator of
electromagnetic modes and, all of a sudden and in defiance of the law of
conservation of energy, a strange energy imbalance was produced. Repeated
experiments with different circuits proved energy output to be always
greater than input."
The mysterious discharge stimulating additional energy extraction was called
the "self generating discharge (SGD)". Measurements showed that part of the
discharge power went back into the network as if two series-connected
electromotive forces were at work.
In a bid to try to explain the experimental data, the researchers actually
tried to prove the impossible. One of their proofs was very "strong".
The one-megawatt substation of the Moscow Aviation Institute, where Chernetski
and Galkin were staging an experiment with a powerful plasma unit, burned out.
When the dischrage currents reached criticality, superstrong current was
"born" in the generator and went back into the network, playing havoc with the
safety devices calculated for short-circuit.
Later on, they read in books that earlier in the century the power plant of
prominent Yugoslav electrical engineer Nikola Tesla caught fire under similar
circumstances in the United States.
Chernetski and Galkin were sure that Tesla was making such experiments, but
did not publish the results. They are also sure that vacuum energy can
explain this mysterious effect.
A Vacuum-Powered Lamp
The researchers relied on the present-day quantum physics idea of "zero-point
oscillations" in physical vacuum. Such oscillations signifying the birth and
annihilation of virtual pairs -- the particle and anti-particle, distinguished
from the normal elementary particles by a negligibly short life, a mere 8.10/-
21[sic] sec.
Emerging below the zero energy level from "nothing" and returning to
"nothing", virtual particles appear to defy the law of conservation of energy.
Quantum electrodynamics explains this paradox through the Heisenberg
uncertainty principle. Under it all the precise particle characteristics
cannot be learnt simulatneously and, therefore, one must not require from
nature "punctual" abidance by the law during such a short time as the life of
virtual pairs.
The observer fails to notice anything, while every virtual pair is more than
real, carrying an energy of more than half a million electron-volts during its
lifetime. The potential energy in the electric bulb vacuum is enough to boil
the earth's oceans, Americans John Wheeler and Richard Feynman have
calculated.
Until recently the vacuum energy idea was only a daring hypothesis bordering
on science-fiction. The lamp powered by vacuum in Chernetski's basememt
laboratory in the center of Moscow made it a reality.
This is how he explains his miraculous experiment:
"The self-generating discharge emerges when the discharge current reach a
definite critical density, when the magnetic fields they create ensure
magnetisation of plasma electrons and they begin to perform mostly
cycloid movements.
The interaction of currents with their magnetic fields forces the
electrons to deviate to the cylinder-shaped discharge axis and the
electrical field emerges. It has proved to 'switch on' the physical
vacuum: in this field the vacuum is polarised and consequently the
virtual pairs begin to move in a definite direction, instead of
chaotically. the virtual positrons accelerate plasma electrons, giving
them part of their energy.
The current in the circuit builds up and additional energy is discharged
on the resistor switched into the discharge circuit. Clearly, only part
of the tremendous vacuum energy is extracted.
"We've developed several circuit versions which can find application. In
the later experiment with an input power of 700 watts, that extracted by
the generator loads resistance was three kilowatts, or nearly five times
more.
This is by far not the limit and with more powerful plants and the
corresponding calculations megawatts of free electricity can be produced
from a minimal power source."
Self-Generating-Discharge Plasmatron and Space Travel
Yuri Galkin looks at the future of their discovery:
"Its applications are wide-ranging. For example, engines based on the
self-generating-discharge plasmatron. Until now all attempts to use
plasmatrons as engines failed, because strong electron and ion
bombardments rapidly burnt out the electrodes.
Self-generating discharge leaves them intact and such engines can be used
in aircraft, trains and autos. It would be logical to create a new
environmentally-wise power industry. Portable hydros, wind power plants
and solar batteries boosted by self-generating discharge could become an
enormous source of electricity. With time, they could edge out the
costly and hazardous fuel-firing and hydraulic [hydroelectric?]
facilities.
Already now we can build a plant which would supply electricity for a
township or factory. A vacuum power station comparable to giant
facilities could be designed today. Our discovery can revolutionise
cosmonautics."
Laboratory experiments have proved the possibility of using the kinetic effect
of self-generating discharge for accelerating bodies in space. Galkin has
calculated the parameters of a self-generating-discharge plasmatron that could
serve as the propulsion engine of the future, replacing the present unwieldy
rocket engines.
Powered by a minor ten-volt source, it can deliver power enough for the
takeoff of a large spaceship. Tapping the ambient space vacuum, it could fly
eternally.
Unknown Waves
"We didn't think of only industrial applications," Chernetski recalls.
"Self-generating discharge turned out to produce wave radiation which was
hitherto unknown, but evidently existent at all times. Like sound waves,
its waves have a longitudinal electric field component and a high
penetrability through condcutive mediums, including metals. It turned
out that these single waves, 'awakening' the hidden vacuum energy, can
alster substance structure.
The experiment staged at the Burdenko Institute of Neurosurgery in Moscow
several years ago showed that directional SGD radiation accelerated
nuclear beta-decomposition by 5%-6%. This is only one example.
We supposed that, like SGD-generator radiation, longitudinal electric-
field component waves could also be produced by living beings, man in
particular.
Comparative experiments were staged to prove the impact on men with
extrasensory perception and of our device on different objects. In both
cases parallel impact on the high-stability quartz generator made its
frequency 'drift' by several orders of magnitude.
The filament resistance of the incandescent lamp decreased considerably.
Probably we are on the road to explaining such mysterious things as
extrasensory perception, telekinesis and bioenergy.
Vacuum-Ether
The experimentally-verified concept of Chernetski claims to be a theoretical
breakthrough in the basic quantum-physics idea of the energy structure of the
Universe. It is generally recognised among physicists that all elementary
particle interactions, and hence every existing phenomenon, occur with the
help of virtual-particle exchange. How does it come about?
"Full annihilation of virtual pairs cannot take place in the event of
partial energy extraction in self-generating discharge, because a
'certain' virtual dipole must emerge -- two separate charges with a
common negative energy. This means that together with energy extraction
vacuum structurisation and ordering takes place.
Actually, our concept is a return to the idea of the universal ether at
an entirely new level. We say that the ordered dipole vacuum, or ether,
is an all-penetrating energy medium in which processes occur which are
related to virtual dipoles and subject to the uncertainty principle of
modern physics."
Chernetski asks: If vacuum structurisation is a constant process, isn't this
an opportunity to state the law of conservation of entropy in the Universe in
opposition to the idea of its steadfast decrease?
What if this work helps to clear up the nature of gravitation, which is as dim
now as it was in the times of Newton? What his concept of the vacuum shows
is the road to the long-awaited explanation of the Grand Unification theory?
"As as experimental physicist I won't say our theory is 100 percent
correct," Chernetski declares. "It's much more an opportunity now to
have indisputable experimental data to prove the opportunity of creating
a basically new power industry."
Only a rapid switch to new energy can save human civilisation from ecological
catastrophe. The research program must be developed immediately and a center
set up to coordinate cooperation between world scientists. Natural and
unlimited vacuum energy is at our doorstep.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the transcript Chris. Any idea where your friend Prasad obtained
this info? Was there a date on it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/circlem.asc
+131
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : CIRCLEM.ASC | Online Date : 12/19/95 |
| Contributed by : Chuck Knight | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following file deals with some anomalies associated with circularly
polarized Electromagnetic waves.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thu, 14 Dec 1995 16:45:18 -0600
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 16:45:17 -0600 (CST)
From: Chuck Knight <chuck@utdallas.edu>
To: keelynet@ix.netcom.com
Subject: fnrg: Rotating Fields (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 15:13:45 -0600 (CST)
From: Robert Stirniman <robert@wwa.com>
To: freenrg-list@mail.eskimo.com
Subject: fnrg: Rotating Fields
Ernest Cullwick was one of the first people, back in 1957, to notice that
there is an unusual problem in trying analyze a rotating EM wave. There hasn't
been much formal work done on this subject since Cullwick's book (at least not
that we know about).
But, it's evident from the the discussion in this forum over the last few
days, that the mysterious properties of the circulating EM wave have not gone
completely un-noticed. Here's a few more things about it.
-- Robert Stirniman
==============================================================================
First some correspondence I received about two months ago:
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 10:01:18 -0500 (CDT)
From: Jim McClune <c517402@everest.cclabs.missouri.edu>
To: Robert Stirniman <robert@wwa.com>
Subject: Circulating EM Waves
If you work out the metric for EM waves circulating in a cavity you get some
strange results. There is a preliminary discussion of this effect in the
article by Houshang Ardavan, 'Gravitational Waves from Electromagnetic Waves'
in the book "Classical General Relativity," edited by W.B. Bonner, I.N. Islam
and M.A.H. MacCollum (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984).
It is something I have seen done. At the point in an annular cavity where the
phase velocity goes from less than c to greater than c, a term shows up in the
derived metric of the system that looks like a source term.
On the other hand you have assumed that the metric is source free in the EM
region of the cavity. So you get a solution which contradicts the hypothesis
that went into building the solution. You get something which is possibly
unphysical.
Now Einstein's equation and the associated geometry is pretty tricky and it is
easy to get unphysical solutions. The final arbiters of whether a solution is
satisfactory or not is physical reasonability and self consistancy (these are
almost the same thing).
The cavity problem seems very physically reasonable initially, but ends with a
self-consistancy problem which appears to be unphysical. Also, Cauchy's
theorem does not apply to this case since it becomes a mixed type problem
(elliptic and hyperbolic PDEs), so the Hawking singularity theorems don't a
priori apply.
It is something very interesting, but to publish it with out being scoffed at
would take a lot of work and possibly inventing some new math.
-- Jim McClune, University of Missouri
==============================================================================
Next some comments by Dr Dennis Cravens in a report titled
"Electric Propulsion Study",
done for the Astronautics Laboratory at Edwards AFB. August 1990.
Dennis Cravens was formerly with SAIC Corp, and is now working with CETI in
development of cold fusion. Anyway, here's some things he says in the electric
propulsion report about the "peculiarities" of a rotating magnet:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROTATION OF MAGNETS - There is a continuing debate in physics as to the
reality of the magnetic field. The prime question is whether the axial
magnetic field of a bar magnet rotates with the magnet or is stationary.
The Faraday homopolar generator dates back to the 1830s. DePalma, Tewari, and
others have attempted to utilize the Faraday generator to produce more power
than needed to run it. Most objective reviews of the work have, however,
failed to see such effects.
It is doubtful that these claims will be independently validated and even more
doubtful that they will lead directly to a propulsive system. However, the
work on homopolar generators as high current devices is reasonable and may be
useful for ground uses. The angular momentum complications seem to rule the
system out for any practical space applications.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEARL EFFECT - The Searl Effect is a separate issue from homopolar generator
above. Searl has claimed to produce disk levitation by rapidly rotating
magnets. There have been claims of anti-gravity, high electric fields,
perpetual motion, inertial loss, and gas ionization. All these claims come
from Searl or those supportive of his work and no outside witnesses are
available. Searl has not supplied any technical data or specifics of the
operation in any easily referenced source. It is not recommended that his work
be experimentally followed by the USAF. It is worth noting however, that a
rotating magnet does have some definite theorectical peculiarities.
Through the years there have been many interesting developments concerning the
Faraday Homopolar generator. DePalma has claimed to get more energy out than
is supplied to the the generator. None of the claims seem to withstand
careful examination and no machine has ever been made self driving. The
underlying reason that such claims continue to surface is that rotating
magnetic fields are extremely difficult to handle within existing theories.
This is because for a rotating frame there is a distance (removed from the
axis) which is travelling at velocities greater than c. Although the distance
is not withing any real physical object, it's existence within the
mathematical development greatly complicates any calculations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References:
DePalma B.E., "Electro-Mechanical Device for the Amplification of Electrical
Power", The New Age Science Magazine, No 7, 1980
Tewari P., "Generation of Electrical Power from Absolute Vacuum by High Speed
Rotation of Conducting Magnetic Cylinder", Tech. Rep. Dept. of
Atomic Energy, Bombay India, 1985
Searl, J.R.R., British provisional patent specification #57578, 1970
==============================================================================
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/clark10.asc
+132
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
September 2, 1993
CLARK10.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This EXCELLENT file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of John Draper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SOFT PARTICLE PHYSICS EXPERIMENT
by
Richard L. Clark
1 September, 1982
Below, are two experiments that may be performed, at small cost in
time and materials, to grasp Soft Particle Physics as a reality.
The first experiment is simply a unity electrical transformer test.
Obtain two nearly identical 60 Hz hollow wire coils (relay coils
will work). Make a square open frame transformer to mount the coils
upon, as a standard primary and secondary winding arrangement.
Plug the primary into a standard household wall outlet, then compare
the power input and power output of the transformer.
The input to output power ratio will be less than unity, due to eddy
currents, hysterisis and other minor transformer losses, as
expected.
Now make a completely enclosing shield of copper or aluminum
sheeting (non magnetic) for the secondary coil winding of the
transformer. Place the shield over the secondary.
You will observe an immediate, drastic reduction in the output of
secondary coil of the transformer. You have Soft Particle STARVED
the secondary of the transformer. Remove the shield and the
operation of the transformer return to normal conditions.
Now let us construct a different passive enclosure for the
transformer, a Phi ratio, pyramid shaped Reich Accumulator. I will
not digress into why the Phi ratio is used, other than that it is a
critical angle to passive Soft Particle structures such as pyramids.
The outside face dimensions for a 6 inch base Phi pyramid has two
5.7 inch sides, and for a 12 inch base has two 11.4 inch sides. You
will need four faces and a square base for each lay of the
Accumulator, proportioned to nest.
Alternate enclosed pyramids of organic and metal material complete
Page 1
the Pyramid Reich Accumulator. Now measure the input power to the
output power of the transformer. The ratio of power in this mode of
transformer operation is greater than the unity standard before.
Can you now maintain that current Physics knows what it is talking
about, even at this elementary level?
Let us now advance to the Reich Cloudbuster and nuclear radiation
systems. There are several independent Cloudbuster Weather
Modification businesses in operation in the United States. The
services of a Cloudbuster and a trained operator can thus be openly
obtained with little effort by the serious researcher.
Obtain a nuclear radiation sample and expose it as the target of an
operating Cloudbuster. Since the Cloudbuster is a passive (sink)
particle beam weapon functioning as a Soft Particle Physics device,
it will DEACTIVATE the nuclear radiation sample.
The reason that the Cloudbuster deactivates the sample (or reactor,
or weapon) is that they are dependent on Soft Particle electron
concentrations to function as a nuclear radiation items.
The Cloudbuster's drain (sink) action greatly reduces this
concentration of Soft Particle Electrons in the sample, thus
deactivating it.
Joseph Cater, author of "The Awesome Life Force", states that a
maximally efficient Cloudbuster would have solid aluminum or copper
barrel tubes to AID soft particle electron CONDUCTION.
Copies of Joseph Cater's publications, may be obtained from :
Tri State Press,
PO Box 150,
Long Creek Highway,
Long Creek, SC 29658
Telephone (803) 647-2020
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/clark11.asc
+229
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : CLARK11.ASC | Online Date : 10/13/95 |
| Contributed by : Mike Hughes | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following simple experiment is claimed to produce overunity and is
something anyone can do at very little cost. It is taken from Energy
Unlimited, 1983, #14, which Mike so kindly shared with all of us here at
KeelyNet.
Please experiment with it and share your observations so others can learn from
your experiences. Thanks!.........................................>>> Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tesla Technology : The Faraday-Tesla-Clark High Current D.C. Generator
by Richard L. Clark
In the theories and discoveries of Faraday there is a well-known device called
the Farady Unipolar Generator. This generator system's theory and
construction design is carried in most standard Physics and Electrical
Engineering texts and handbooks. The models and designs shown are in fact a
later Tesla improved design of the basic system.
The basic disc rotating in a magnetic field to produce an extremely high
current, low voltage direct current is standard technology. The Faraday
Unipolar Generator is also a standard Faraday Unipolar Motor.
If you turn the disc mechanically, the disc rotating in the fixed, parallel to
rotation, magnetic field causes a direct current of high current and low
voltage to appear at the two output terminals.
But conversely, if you apply a high current, low voltage direct current to the
output terminals of this same unit, it will rotate mechanically as a motor via
the disc being a conductor in the magnetic field. So much for the present
theory and design as accepted by all standards and professionals currently.
The Clark modification to the Faraday Unipolar Generator-Motor will now be
outlined. The previously fixed permanent magnets, or electromagnets, that
formed the magnetic field for the Faraday Generator-Motor are now attached to
the disc itself as a part of the rotating element. Now the Faraday design is
only a generator and NOT a motor. A voltage and current across the output
terminals does NOTHING but see a nearly dead short, and therefore, it is no
longer a motor at all.
But when the disc is rotated mechanically it is still a generator unit of very
high current and low voltage direct current as previously designed by Faraday.
The GAIN from this modification is that the output load does NOT put a motor
type drag on the disc drive element as the load current INCREASES. Thus, the
rotational drive force for rotation of the disc is CONSTANT, without regard to
current drawn by the generator output load. The Clark modified Faraday
Generator can therefore EXCEED 100% input power to output power efficiencies,
producing "free energy". So much for Lenz's Law and back EMF problems.
The best unit would be a Faraday-Motor driving a Clark Modified Faraday
Generator Unit. This is because of the IDENTICAL current and voltage
requirements of these two systems on a common shaft drive design.
To start this unit a simple pull-rope could be used to rotate the system
initially. Once turning, the generator outputs and drives the motor, which
turns the generator, bootstrapping up to the controlled speed regulation
point. Then the surplus generator output, above motor running power, is
available to run external power needs - lights, motors, etc.
Since this is a high current, low voltage direct current generator system, an
inverter unit is necessary to convert the direct current output into
alternating current of 60Hz and 115 volts for standard household utility.
Should the reader wish to build a small working model of this Clark Modified
Faraday Generator, the brief plans will be given:
On a six-inch long, 3/8 inch diameter brass or copper rod,
place a copper or brass washer of 3 to 6 cm diameter, about 1/8 inch thick.
Obtain 6 to 8 radio store ceramic toroid magnets for about 25 cents each,
giving you a 2,000 or 3,000 Gauss magnetic stack.
Place all these magnets in a stack, north pole up.
Place 4 of these magnets on the rod below the copper or brass washer and the
other 4 on top of the washer.
All polarities of the magnets MUST face toward the same end of the rod,.
Now rotate the rod, north magnetic and clockwise, in an electric drill or
lathe chuck.
Using a sensitive voltage-current meter, the output can be read between the
outer edge of the disc and the center of the rod.
The formula for this device is:
E out = disc area in cm(2) X gauss of magnets
X revolutions per second of the disc X 10(-8).
(cm(2) is cm squared and 10(-8) is 10 to the negative 8th)
Great care should be observed in balancing and handling of this flywheel
device at high speeds. The gains in larger design models are in the disc
(flywheel) radius by the SQUARES, and only linear for Gauss and rotational
velocity. Therefore, new designs need large radius discs as the primary
optionizing model parameter.
The units can be linked in series to raise the ouput voltage level. Be very
careful on all wiring terminations to minimize resistance.
Copies of this paper and the proper submission forms have been sent to the
Energy-Related Inventions Office of the National Bureau of Standards and other
Federal Government officials. Copies are also being sent to all of the
newsletters of the free-energy and clean-energy movement for consideration for
their publications. I am going to develop and market these clean, fuel-free
generator systems for American consumers at the most reasonable prices
possible.
Other applications of this Clark-Modified Faraday Generator system would be to
propel electric automobiles without the heavy and costly batteries. Small
aircraft and boats can also be built or modified to use this new power system.
Also, using the known Townsend Effect, a LIFT type of airframe, like a "flying
saucer" can be built based on this new generator as a polarized capacitor and
flywheel inertia system.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As further information for this experiment........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Faraday Unipolar Generator
(excerpted from Towards a New Electromagnetic Reality - Part 1 of 3
by Donald Reed of Tachion Energy Research, Box 192, South Wales, NY 14134))
Perhaps one of the earliest observations of an electromagnetic enigma, was
noted by Michael Faraday in 1831. He discovered that a rotating magnetized
conductor, with axis of rotation passing through the magnetic poles, could act
as an electrical generator with voltage developed between the point of the
axis of rotation and the outer periphery of the rotating magnets. This he
called a homopolar or unipolar generator.
Now, up to Faraday's time, it had been assumed that a magnet moving in any
manner CARRIED ITS FIELD ALONG WITH IT. But in that case, contrary to
Faraday's experimental results, no voltage could be produced.
It thus became necessary for Faraday to postulate that the material of the
magnet moved through its magnetic field which, in itself, was not supposed to
be moved by the magnet generating it. (the field remains stationary!!)
Oddly enough, the controversy still rages today between proponents of the two
theories. In fact, no application of standard electromagnetic theory to date
has been able to resolve the question.
To make matters worse, even if one takes Faraday's position, assuming a
STATIONARY MAGNETIC FIELD, subsequent analysis shows that one branch of
electromagnetics, the Coulomb-Ampere law, predicts the observed voltage;
whereas Maxwell's equations show that NO POTENTIAL WILL EXIST.
If this weren't enough to lend mystery to the devices' operation, it has
recently been discovered by Bruce dePalma, over a century following Faraday,
that the unipolar generator, in a new embodiment he has called the N-Machine,
produces NO DRAG on the rotor system. This is contrary to the predictions of
Lenz' Law, one of the standard principles of electromagnetic induction.
(Lenz' law is the backward flowing electromotive force when the reverse
rotation of the shaft canses a reverse current flow, this reverse flow
collides with the forward moving current to create heating in the circuit
resulting in a significant reduction in efficiency)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
____________________
| | Positive (+)
| _|_
| / \ load,
sn sn sn sn V sn sn sn sn | | voltmeter,
|--|--|--|--|-|--|--|--|--| \ _ _ / or ammeter
disc magnet stacks -> |\\|\\|\\|\\|*|//|//|//|//| |
|\\|\\|\\|\\|*|//|//|//|//| | Negative (-)
/--> |\\|\\|\\|\\|*|//|//|//|//| |
-----|----------------------------------------V-
-----\------------------------------------------
\__/ |\\|\\|\\|\\|*|//|//|//|//| /|\
clockwise |\\|\\|\\|\\|*|//|//|//|//| |
rotation |\\|\\|\\|\\|*|//|//|//|//| |_ copper, bronze or
|--|--|--|--|-|--|--|--|--| brass shaft
sn sn sn sn ^ sn sn sn sn
|
conducting disc (metal washer)
Notes : 1) the shaft rotates freely in the center hole of the disc magnet
stacks and the washer, it DOES NOT TOUCH the magnets
2) Radio Shack sells a package of 5 disc magnets with a hole in the
center for $1.69
3) there is a limit to how many magnets you can stack before the
field strength begins to weaken, experiences with the TOMIBILD
circuit show that 10 of these disc magnets in a single stack is
about the best number to use and still have high field strength
4) remember Homopolar Generators produce high current, low voltage,
Tewari reports 1500 amps at 2 volts from his heavy duty units,
but you won't get anything like that from this small one
5) and keep in mind that heating occurs when the flow of direct
current is resisted, so keep your connections as solid and
secure as possible
6) the use of carbon contacts, held in a sleeve and with a flat
metal coil on the outside end to maintain pressure against the
rotating shaft are one of the most common methods to tap off the
current, though dePalma uses mercury in an enclosed plexiglas
chamber, if you choose to use mercury, make sure you have good
ventilation and use safe handling techniques
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In bandying about some ideas on this with Chuck Henderson, he suggested using
a slot car motor, some of which run at 1.5 volts, others at 3 volts. The
motor will pull only the current it needs to sustain the load and could be
quick started with an outside battery source to achieve sufficient output to
begin producing current on its own.
DePalma and Tewari both note that they have never succeeded in folding the
output back to run the input. However, it might work by feeding a battery
or a battery network which THEN runs the motor.
In a lengthy private discussion with Dr. Tewari, he told some of our group
that he had developed an AC Homopolar generator, but had been using the DC
Homopolar unit's high current output to generate hydrogen from water. The
hydrogen gas was then burned for other uses.
We note that KeelyNetter Mike Randall reports voluminous hydrogen/oxygen
production (Brown's gas) using 30 amps at 2 volts in a 60 cycle pulsed mode.
Imagine what 1500 amps would yield. Tewari is using direct current at low
voltage to produce his gases.
Experiment with it and see what you can come up with. Just be very careful
when dealing with any circuits involving high currents or mercury!..>>> Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/clark2.asc
+132
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
May 28, 1993
CLARK2.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of John Draper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
OVER UNITY ELECTRICAL GENERATOR DESIGN
by
Richard L. Clark
The best form of an Over Unity Generator would have no moving parts.
Looking at the common transformer and how it works, provides the
answer. If I take a DC power supply and connect it to the primary
of the transformer, I can make a generator of sorts. I'll turn "on"
the DC to the primary for just an instant and then turn it "off".
In the secondary, there is a flux linkage, following the primary
signal, which is some 90% of the input power. Any transformer
secondary will produce about 180% of the input power in this mode,
with a gradually applied quarter sine or sawtooth wave shape DC
input.
But wait, we are throwing recoverable power away in the primary coil
winding's field collapse. Now, let us apply the DC power input and
then, when the input power is cut off, switch the primary winding's
field collapse to the output also. The primary's field collapse
contributes at least another 90% to the output for a grand total of
about 270% gain in the over unity generator design.
The DC power signal, must only take the primary winding up and then
let go (open) at the top voltage. Thus, the primary can be switched
to the output to recover it's field collapse.
Electronic switching can accomplish all of these functions at little
power usage and cost. There, the gain of a transformer Over Unity
Generator, would probably be around the 250% output power to input
power, and there is no mechanical motion.
Some old motors and generators could be adapted to the transformer
design above. The armature must be fixed permanently stationary,
and the air gap between the armature and field coils, filled with
iron filings. The air gap iron filings or iron power filling, is to
make the best use of the primary's (armature) full flux power. This
makes for the best transformer action and the highest power gain
possible with this conversion design. The electronic switching
circuitry, is the same as the common transformer design. All we
have done is convert the motor to a transformer.
In this design, for one "up" (power signal) in the primary coil, we
Page 1
get the "up" (field build) in the secondary coil and the "downs"
(field collapses) of both the secondary and primary coils as output
power.
Think of the transformer coils as coupled "springs", and it may be
clearer. This transformer/generator design has been in the nature
of electromagnetic coils all the time. If the unit is actuated 60
times a second, allowing for the counter-electromotive force filed
collapses, it makes a standard 60Hz electrical generator. This
design concept, is the natural last step after recovery of the
secondary collapses, introduced in generator designs.
The same principal and results could then be achieved in a capacitor
system. The charge (up) cycle from the secondary plate and the two
discharge cycles from both secondary and primary plates, would be
the output power. The basic external switching electronics is
basically the same as in the transformer designs.
These designs are in the basic nature of energy storage/transfer
elements....one input allows for the utility of the one input
transfer and the two storage collapses or discharges as output power
(about 300% gain).
****
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/clark3.asc
+132
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
May 28, 1993
CLARK3.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of John Draper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
ANTI-GRAVITY CHARGED MASS LAW
by
Richard L. Clark, Ph.D
Anti-gravity is relatively proportionate to the charge of the mass
of a body with respect to the charge of a planet's mass. This is
the basic fact of the De Palma, Searle and Townsend Brown
experiments and designs.
All of the men create capacitive elements, via charge or spinning
charge, to make anti-gravity units relative to the planet Earth.
The general law is simply:
Anti-gravity can be generated in any mass of matter if the
poles of the atomic fields are aligned in a linear polarity.
This is exactly like the molecular alignment necessary in magnetic
domains to produce magnetism in a bar magnet. Interestingly, the
bumble bee is an excellent example of this natural fact. Its wings
are electrostatic generators in an air medium, and it is an anti-
gravity flier.
Let us now make a repeatable, scientific experiment using any five
humans as an anti-gravity system. Four standing people form a small
square, with the fifth person sitting on a stool or chair, in the
center. All five face in the same direction.
In unison, all five must bend at the waist while exhaling all of the
air from their lungs. Then, all five straighten up in unison while
inhaling deeply. This bending and straightening sequence is
repeated at least seven times.
On the seventh bending/exhaling, the two people in front each place
one index finger under each knee of the seated person. At the same
time, the two people in the rear each place an index finger under
each armpit of the seated person.
Then, as the five straighten up and inhale for seventh time, the
four lift the seated person over their heads effortlessly, using
only the index fingers.
Page 1
The unison breathing and bending causes the atoms in the air to be
lined up and an anti-gravity system is created by this simple
exercise.
After doing this experiment it will be obvious that flying saucers
with anti-gravity systems, can be built. It is again observation
of nature, neutral centers, and standing columnar waves.
The impact of the above new physics law changes all of the concepts
of gravity, inertia, electricity, magnetism, time, space, etc.
completely. This is not an addition, revision, or expansion of
current physics; it is a new physics.
Moving a 60 ton block for the Great Pyramid or Stonehenge is simple
to explain or do. Designing radically new transportation, free
energy, and totally non-hydrocarbon and non-nuclear systems for all
of our needs is practical and possible with this basis system.
Physics today is an elegant treatment of the least common state of
raw, random nature in the entropy state. We can now engineer the
basic forces of the universe via information and intelligence - -
negative entropy.
****
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/clark4.asc
+66
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
May 28, 1993
CLARK4.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of John Draper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
OVER-UNITY OUTPUT VIA MODIFICATION TO STANDARD MANUFACTURED
ELECTRIC GENERATORS AND MOTORS
by
Richard L. Clark, Ph.D.
The standard manufactured electrical generator systems can be
modified inexpensively to the Over-Unity design concept. By the
addition of a second set of commutator brushes and/or the addition
of a second slip-ring assemble in the present electrical generators,
Over-Unity output is achievable in a matter of hours. These
additional elements are to collect (scavenge) the collapsing fields
(C.E.M.F.) of both the armatures and field coils of present
electrical generator sets. Present electrical generator designs
throw away this tremendous amount of valuable electrical energy in
the form of C.E.M.F..
On the armature/exciter element, install a second set of brushes or
sliprings, the exact amount behind the driver units needed to
collect the C.E.M.F. of the armature's field collapse, to take it
out of the system for utility. On the field coils system, install a
second set of brushes/slip rings, the exact amount behind the
original primary field coil system needed to collect the C.E.M.F. of
the field coils' collapsing fields for utility when taken out of the
unit.
The additional new C.E.M.F. outputs can be phased to the original
output system in the load wiring. These modifications far more than
doubled the generator's output power at small modification costs,
and at no increase in operating costs. This general design
modification allows almost any currently manufactured electrical
generator set to be an Over-unity design. With some additional
external modifications, a self running or stand alone Over-unity
configuration can be achieved on most commercial electrical
generators. As most manufactured electric motors can be made into
electrical generators the above type of modification can be done to
these electrical motors.
Richard L. Clark, Ph.D.
4015 Crown Point Drive, P-3
San Diego, CA 92109
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/clark7.asc
+66
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
July 5, 1993
CLARK7.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of John Draper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SIMPLE PARTICLE BEAM WEAPONRY
by
Robert L. Clark, Ph.D
There are gross exaggerations and cunning lies in the current
technical literature and lectures as to the complexity of Particle
Beam Weapons. The false assertions in regard to the great
complexity of the Particle Beam Weapon, are necessary to justify the
enormous sums spent on research and development. For a good
understanding of the basis theoretical and design aspects of
Particle Beam Systems, readers are encouraged to obtain the book,
Awesome Life Force by Joseph Cater. To order it, send $16 postpaid
to:
Tri-State Press
PO Box 150
Long Creek Hwy.
Long Creek, S.C. 29658
The average person with only two straight, highly polished strips of
metal and a sunny day can make a Particle Beam System. The strips
can be any length but to begin, try strips about 10 inches long and
about one inch wide. The two metal strips must be highly polished -
or better - chrome plated, to make excellent first surface mirrors.
The two metal strips are placed slightly apart and parallel to each
other, held slightly off-perpendicular to the earth with top opening
aimed at the sun. Extreme care must be taken as to where the bottom
beam exit is aimed. At addition of inexpensive optics on the light
input end of this device greatly increases the power of your
Particle Beam System.
A high intensity artificial light source (strobe light or photo
flash is excellent) may also be used to input the device in place of
the sun, making a portable, practical Particle Beam System. The
variations in design and utility are endless.
After you have completed this simple experimental unit, you will
never again be taken in by the foolishness and lies of supposed
complexity of Particle Beam Systems.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/clark8.asc
+132
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
July 5, 1993
CLARK8.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of John Draper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
THE REICH ANSWER TO NUCLEAR WEAPONS, REACTORS AND WASTE
by
Richard L. Clark, Ph.D.
The research of Wilhelm Reich describes the reaction of Orgone
Energy to nuclear materials -- that is, it increases tremendously
the rate of decay (half Life) of the nuclear materials. Thus, a
nuclear weapons system, reactor pile, or waste area bombarded by
Reich Orgone Energy would fail safe by losing its radioactivity
potential and becoming an inert mass. Fifteen minutes of exposure
to Orgone Energy would reduce the core of a typical nuclear reactor
to lead. This process would normally take millions of years.
Orgone Energy and nuclear radiation energy are perfect antithetical
systems and cancel each other out without harmful human or
environmental side effects of any kind.
The Orgone Energy immersion system that would be most applicable to
deactivating nuclear systems of all types would be the Reich
Accumulator Cloudbuster System. (A Cloudbuster consists of several
long metal tubes, with one end connected with a wire to a body of
moving water. For additional details on construction and operation
of accumulators and Cloudbusters, contact: Natural Energy Works, PO
Box 864, El Cerrito, California 94530. Include $1.00 for a
catalog.)
The range of a Cloudbuster is almost infinite, limited only by line
of sight problems. The energy transfer functions are near linear
unity and not the square of the distance losses of ordinary energy
systems.
Simple construction and testing of a Cloudbuster on a nuclear sample
will convince even the hardest skeptic that there is no real nuclear
problem. There was only a technology gap between pro-nukes and
anti-nukes. Now that knowledge gap has diminished to zero.
A secondary issue that portable Cloudbusters would settle is the
Government's denial of the existence of UFOs, or flying saucers.
The Cloudbuster can shoot down these officially nonexistent objects
with ease. Reich himself proved this fact thirty years ago; the
Page 1
Government knows this. The sauces are very real and very earthly in
origin. Their primary power is a nuclear reactor -- thus the
Cloudbuster can deactivate them.
The Russian spy satellite with its nuclear reactor powered radar
over the Malvinas is typical of the nuclear farce. All the major
powers are fully aware of the effect of Orgone Energy on nuclear
material.
An Orgone Energy shield, easy and cheap to build, would render any
country invulnerable to nuclear attack.
May 20, 1982
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/clem1.asc
+198
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
December 26, 1992
CLEM1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
A few months back, we got a call from a friend who had heard of this
incredible motor that was said to run itself and generate excess
useable power. The details were unclear at the time and our friend
gathered more details and we met for lunch to discuss what he had
found out. A scanned image of the machine as it was described to
him with those details will be included in CLEM2.ZIP (when I get it
done). It is NOW done and is CLEM1.GIF, bundled as CLEM2.ZIP.
As we understand it, inventor Richard Clem died of a heart attack
soon after the deal was signed with the coal company. His workshop
was raided by law enforcement officials and all his notes and
drawings were removed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The story as I was told by our unnamed friend :
A local man (Dallas) developed a closed system engine that was
purported to generate 350 HP and run itself. The engine weighed
about 200 pounds and ran on cooking oil at temperatures of 300 F.
It consisted of a cone mounted on a horizontal axis. The shaft
which supported the cone was hollow and the cone had spiralling
channels cut into it. These spiralling pathways wound around the
cone terminating at the cone base in the form of nozzles (rimjets).
When fluid was pumped into the hollow shaft at pressures ranging
from 300-500 PSI (pounds per square inch), it moved into the closed
spiralling channels of the cone and exited from the nozzles. This
action caused the cone to spin. As the velocity of the fluid
increased, so did the rotational speed of the cone.
As the speed continued to increase, the fluid heated up, requiring a
heat exchange and filtering process. At a certain velocity, the
rotating cone became independent of the drive system and began to
operate of itself. The engine ran at speeds of 1800 to 2300 RPM.
Immediately after the inventor had the heart attack and the papers
were removed, the son of the inventor took the only working model of
the machine to a farm near Dallas. There it was buried under 10
feet of concrete and has been running at that depth for several
years.
In later conversations, our contact says the engine had been tested
by Bendix Corporation. The test involved attaching the engine to a
Page 1
dynamometer to measure the amount of horsepower generated by the
engine in its self-running mode.
It generated a consistent 350 HP for 9 consecutive days which
astounded the engineers at Bendix. They concluded the only source
of power which could generate this much power in a CLOSED SYSTEM
over an extended period must be of an atomic nature.
Construction of the engine was from off the shelf components except
for the hollow shaft and the custom cone with the enclosed spiral
channels.
Richard Clem worked with heavy machinery for the city of Dallas and
had noticed that certain kinds of high pressure pumps continued to
run for short periods after the power was removed. His curiosity
into this phenomenon led to the development of the Clem Engine.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is from a newspaper clipping.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Clem Over-Unity Motor
In 1972, Richard Clem announced the invention of a way to operate
automobile engines on cooking oil.
He's still making that claim today, even though his first prototype
motor fell apart and he had been "strung along" by at least 15
companies before he found financial backing.
Clem, 48, a heavy equipment operator for the city of Dallas and
part-time inventor, says if the automobile industry adopts his
invention, motorists could change the eight gallons of vegetable oil
only every 150,000 miles and never buy any gas.
Clem said he uses vegetable oil because his motor runs at 300
degrees - a temperature where water has boiled away and conventional
motor oil breaks down. Though he won't divulge many details of the
engine, a 12-volt battery apparently is the only other source of
power.
When Clem finished his first vegetable oil engine in 1972, he mapped
a 600-mile test trip to El Paso for the first engine model he had
financed through his earnings. But he only made it as far as
Abilene before the "shafts and everything bent in it."
He blamed the failure on poor construction, too small a shaft and
the use of chains instead of gears. Undaunted, he decided to try
again, but said, "I needed money to build this thing better."
Neither the automobile industry nor the 15 other companies he wrote
- some as far away as Taiwan - were interested in financing a
prototype and then manufacturing it.
Then last year, he said, a large coal company offered to back him.
Clem refused to disclose the name of his benefactor, but did say the
coal company had signed contracts to sell the engines to power
companies for use in pulling turbines.
Clem said he expects to finish work on the motor by the end of this
year. (1972)
Page 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Note..
The above article was reported as being generated from Flower
Mound, Texas (northwest of Dallas and slightly beyond
Carrollton). I called the only Clem listed in the book as of
11/20/92 and they knew of no other Clem in that area, nor did
they know of any Richard Clem or his family.
Two separate visits to the patent section of the Dallas Library
have not yielded any patents by a Richard Clem involving any
type of engine. We are still pursuing for more details.
As of 12/26/92, I drew up a .GIF file called CLEM1.GIF that is
bundled with this file under the name CLEM2.ZIP. It gives a
better understanding of how the machine was constructed, at
least as it was described to us.
For those who study such matters, one immediately sees the tie-
ins with Boundary Layer Drag principles as evinced in much of
Tesla's work. We have noted something odd about spinning
masses in that at specific velocities, strange things occur.
The velocities at which phenomena occur are dependent on the
resonant frequencies of the mass as an aggregate, exactly as
Keely said.
The Clem system was said to be built with off the shelf
components. The most complicated piece of the entire machine
was the cone. And based on Boundary layer drag, it would seem
that the cone was unnecessary. The question with the Clem
device is "Does the extended surface area of the cone add to
the rotational velocity of the cone, yielding greater pressures
through centrifugal force or would flat plates as in the TESLA
turbine be sufficient to generate the same effect?".
We continue to look for further information on this device and
appreciate your comments or supporting material.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/clemcomm.asc
+94
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : CLEMCOMM.ASC | Online Date : 05/18/95 |
| Contributed by : Josef Hasslberger| Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| WWW sites - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb & http://www.protree.com |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The file CLEM1.ASC and CLEM1.GIF as derived from information provided by Mr.
Albert Holman and a Dallas newspaper article are available on KeelyNet, either
as separate files or both bundled as CLEM2.ZIP.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments to CLEM1.ASC
Richard Clem's rotational engine
Although I do not have any information on Clem or his device, I would like to
comment on the principle of operation, which seems quite simple and
straightforward to all who have studied the writings of Viktor Schauberger,
the Austrian naturalist and inventor.
Indeed Schauberger was working with vortex action in liquids (especially in
water) and was finding effects that were at the time, and are still now,
unexplainable with the normal principles of physics or thermodynamics.
As far as I understand the engine made by Clem was built around a cone with
spiralling channels cut into it and when a liquid, in this case vegetable oil,
got pressed through the channels, they caused the cone to turn and at a
certain point the flow of the liquid and the turning of the cone became self-
sustaining, up to the point of putting out a good and heavy (350 HP for 200
pounds of engine) power output.
As I said, this is not surprising if one is familiar with the work of
Schauberger. In the USA, there is one person I know of who has researched
Viktor Schauberger's work in depth and who is trying to disseminate the vortex
technology that grew out of Schauberger's work, through a publication called
Energy Unlimited and a newsletter ("Causes"). His name and address:
Walter Baumgartner
P.O.Box 493
Magdalena, New Mexico 87825-0493
telephone (505) 854-2634
To return to the Clem engine, the principle of this machine is based on the
fact that vortices in liquids under certain circumstances are self-
accelerating and may be used to actual work.
One example of this in nature is the tornado, that may reach very high
inherent energies without apparent input from the outside.
Schauberger used this principle before the second world war, to run a small
turbine for electric energy production that is said to have had an output of
approximately nine times that a conventional turbine would have had with the
same amount of water and the same altitude differential. He patented his
turbine and the patent is described in a separate article of mine.
It is not known for certain what this effect is based on. From my view there
are two possibilities:
1) A vortex "absorbs" ambient heat and utilizes the energy contained in it
to augment its own motion. As heat is in fact molecular or atomic motion
(absolute zero being the absence of any motion of this kind), a vortex
could conceivably be able to direct that motion into one direction, thus
ending up with
a) decreased environmental temperature and
b) increased motion.
Both factors seem to hold true for vortices.
2) The second possibility is that the vortex motion, being the most
congenial motion to the ether or space background, is a means of tapping
the inherent energy in space, also variously called zero-point energy,
space energy or gravity field energy.
A vortex, especially fast-turning and especially in dense material, may be
"assisted" in its motion by a vortex forming in the space background or ether,
that will eventually give up energy to the vortex in the fluid.
These two explanations are not mutually exclusive and both mechanisms may be
at work. They are at this time speculative attempts to explain properties of
vortices. Although the explanations are speculative, the properties of
vortices as such are not. They have been observed and measured and are shown
to us daily by nature.
What Schauberger (and now Clem) have done is that they have found a way to
harness a phenomenon that has found little or no attention from the scientific
community.
The implications of this for energy production are enormous as can be readily
seen reading the file CLEM1.ASC.
Josef Hasslberger
Rome, Italy 17/5/1995
email: j.hasslberger@agora.stm.it
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/coal2gas.asc
+198
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=78, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
August 16, 1990
Annotated from an article in the
Dallas Morning News on Tuesday, September 4, 1990
contributed by Ron Barker
Scientists seek to study Nazi paper.
Texas A&M researchers interested in coal-to-gasoline process.
Associated Press
COLLEGE STATION, Texas --
Texas A&M University researchers want to resume the study of
Nazi documents about producing gasoline from coal - a process that
they say may alleviate the United States' dependency on foreign oil.
More than 300 rolls of microfilmed documents dealing with the
process are stored in the university's library, but few have been
translated or read.
The documents detail Germany's research and development of 25
synthetic fuel plants from 1936 through 1945. The plants provided 90
percent of the Nazis' aviation fuel and 68 percent of the rest of
its energy needs, the records show.
Vangard Note...
After the war, the records were placed under a 30 year
moratorium from the public to prevent the sudden release of radical
technology which might disrupt American businesses.
*******
Texas A&M researchers began gathering and scrutinizing the
documents for practical application in 1975, but the project was
abandoned five years later.
Arnold Krammer, an A&M history professor, told the `Houston
Chronicle' that the documents also record the U.S. government's
short-lived synthetic fuel program.
Two U.S. plants, built in Louisiana, Mo., using Nazi designs
and technology, turned out 200 to 400 barrels of gasoline daily for
as little as 1.6 cents per gallon from 1949 to 1953, according to
U.S. Bureau of Mines records.
That project was shut down by President Eisenhower's
administration, Mr. Krammer, 49, said. "Without question, it was due
to lobbying by oil companies who didn't want the competition," he
said.
Mr. Krammer and other A&M researchers tracked down Nazi Germany
Page 1
war documents in diverse locations that included basements in West
Virginia, the Imperial Museum in London, the National Archives and
the Library of Congress in Washington and German depositories.
Most of the documents were captured and stored after the Allied
victory over the Nazis in 1945. Many of the crates had been stored,
unopened, since the war.
As a result, Mr. Krammer said, Texas A&M is the only
institution with most of the Nazi and U.S. secrets to synthetic
fuels.
Mr. Krammer said he hopes the project will obtain funding to
hire a research team to read, translate and computer index the
documents. He estimated the project would take five years to
complete at a cost of about $200,000 annually.
The chemical process for turning coal into gasoline is known to
about every chemistry graduate student, he said. But it generally
has been considered uneconomical.
He said, however, that Nazi German research might unlock the
keys to making the process cheaper than pumping petroleum.
"It is the details that we have in these documents, details of
where the Germans went wrong, and what worked and what did not
work," he said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional Vangard notes
Chuck Henderson said he heard a local radio broadcast which was
about the current gas/oil crisis and what was known about
alternative fuels.
A caller from Fort Worth said he had access to the Nazi documents
back in 1957 and had photocopied the them for his own use. He also
claimed that he had successfully converted coal into gasoline at a
cost of 10 cents per gallon.
The man is George Vestal at (817) 497-4208. I called him the
next day but he was out. He later returned my call and sounded
slightly manic as if he was hyper stimulated or overly excited. I
asked him about the radio talk show and what he had. He told me he
had photocopied ALL THE NAZI DOCUMENTS in 1975 and had figured out
how to convert the coal to gasoline.
I then asked him if he had found any information relating to
electrical or flying machines and he said, "Do you mean
electromagnetic flying machines, yea, I have all that stuff."
I told him of my particular interest in the Kugelblitz and that
we could exchange information if he was interested. He said no way,
he was going to keep everything he had. I asked him, "Well, what
do you plan to do with it?" to which he replied, "If I can't get
something out of it, I'll just keep it to myself." This included
the coal to gas papers and processes.
This information was passed around to various KeelyNet and
Page 2
Vangard Associates who contributed additional information. A friend
has a friend who knows Arnold Krammer of A&M very well. He had him
ask Mr. Kramer about the papers.
Krammer said that the only papers which were publicly available
in 1975 were the coal to gas papers and not many people had access
to them at the time. As to claims that other information had been
copied, he said impossible, as the crates had not even been opened
TO THIS DATE. This was before the above article was published.
So, as far as I am concerned, Mr. Vestal might have some papers
but not the advanced documents which we are interested in.
To our knowledge, the papers are under the second 30 year
moraturium and not available to the public until 2005.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as
this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the Vangard
Sciences address as listed on the first page. Thank you for your
consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 484-3189
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/coilbak.asc
+330
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
August 15, 1993
COILBAK.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This EXCELLENT file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Joel McClain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The circuit diagram for this text is called COILBAK.GIF.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
We wish to publicly thank Mr. Joel McClain for making available this
most interesting circuit. Joel is an active experimenter with an
incredible grasp of the concepts involved in PRACTICAL Free Energy
devices. If you choose to build or experiment with this circuit, we
at KeelyNet would greatly appreciate a report on your findings. Of
most use and greatest interest would be different circuit
arrangements, power input/output levels or any other information
that our many other experimenters might find of use or
inspirational. You may transfer information in several forms, as a
direct FILE UPLOAD to the BBS, as a message placed directly ON the
BBS, as a FAX or VOICE CALL to (214) 324-8741.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
File Name : COILBAK.ASC
Author : Joel McClain
Date : August 6, 1993
Theory of Operation
COILBAK is a simple circuit consisting of an astable oscillator and
an inverting comparator. The output of the astable is used to
energize a 6VDC relay, as well as to supply the inverting input to
the comparator.
SCR1 is normally ON. As the output of the astable RISES, the relay
is energized. When the astable output rises above reference (9VDC),
the comparator output goes LOW, disabling SCR1.
The inductive "kick", which is a HIGH NEGATIVE SPIKE, is discharged
to the storage battery negative terminal, via steering diode D2.
The storage battery absorbs the spike, and couples the net voltage
increase to the supply battery.
The aggregate energy of the spike as it discharges will EXCEED the
energy required to produce it, given the following conditions :
1. the sawtooth frequency is adjusted to energize the relay in
the LEAST possible time.
Page 1
2. the reference voltage is OPTIMIZED to provide an adequate
relay CHARGE TIME at the LEAST possible DISCHARGE time.
3. a high conductive path, (i.e. LARGE GAUGE WIRE) is provided
from D2 to the STORAGE battery.
The net effect of optimizing the above is to achieve an aggregate
circuit resonance. It is based upon the GRAY motor, which
substituted electromagnets FOR THE RELAY, and which was capable of
powering an automobile.
This circuit is an above-unity voltage source, allowing surplus
energy to be tapped from the supply battery. It may be possible to
substitute large values of capacitance for the batteries, provided
that the tapped energy does not exceed the level required to sustain
circuit operation.
Each circuit must BE TUNED for its OPTIMUM POINT, which consists of
varying the sawtooth frequency and adjusting the reference voltage
for the LARGEST SPIKE with the SHORTEST discharge time.
Improvements may include pull-up networks (resistor + diode) on the
op-amp outputs, to avoid "float", if that affects operation.
Removing the cover of the relay will allow more air around the coil,
which is necessary to optimize the spike amplitude.
The GRAY motor was able to vary speed in intervals, based upon even-
order harmonics of the resonant circuit frequency. Once you attain
optimum gain from the circuit, you may want to try this, as well.
However, the GRAY motor also had inertial momentum to sustain
rotation above the starting point while increasing speed, and the
relay does not have this advantage.
What GRAY realized is that there is NO SUCH THING AS A DC MOTOR!
In a motor which is energized by a non-flucutating voltage source,
the inductive kick from the electromagnets is consumed as heat in
the windings. The CURRENT, if viewed on an oscilloscope, is
alternating, based upon the EMF (electro-motive force) and CEMF
(counter electro-motive force) of the inductive path. Therefore,
providing a discharge path will permit recapture of energy and
reduce heat. His motors ran very cool. Using the resonant
frequency of the electromagnets at peak allowed him to stress the
barrier and increase output energy, much the same as with a Tesla
coil, which produces several times the input power in the secondary.
The key is resonance on both types of devices.
In retrospect, the spike which COILBAK is "recycling" has ALWAYS
BEEN considered a nuisance in relay logic circuits, as it can
puncture the oxide barrier in CMOS devices which share a signal
ground path with the relays. It is typically suppressed or steered
back into the relay coil by diode, to dissipate it. All we are
doing is saving the spike energy, which EXCEEDS input at resonance.
The "aether" as it is called, or the air around us, or the vacuum in
a vacuum tube, is replete with primary and harmonic energy, at
levels which ARE INCALCULABLE! Stressing the barrier with ANY form
of energy will produce gains above unity. Keely did this with
sound, and Tesla did it with electricity. Gray did it with EMP.
COILBAK does it using the GRAY model, with some modification. If
Page 2
you are familiar with inductor theory, you know that there is a
phase lag of 90 degrees, before current begins to flow.
COILBAK is de-energizing the coil by cutting off the voltage supply
at the point where EMF has ATTAINED MAXIMUM, but no longer. Current
is not allowed to be wasted as heat, but is delimited as CEMF in a
low resistance to the storage battery.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Note
You will note the use of several interesting points in this
file. Specifically, Joel's use of the term "an aggregate
circuit resonance" correlates with one of the discoveries made
by John Keely in the late 1800's. The file NEUTRAL1 gives the
basis for much of this principle of aggregation.
Essentially, each atom has a fundamental frequency, each bundle
of atoms forms a molecule which has a fundamental frequency in
addition to all the "bundled" atomic frequencies and so all the
molecules when aggregated (bundled) together form a mass
resonant frequency. Such an aggregation of frequencies can be
so manipulated as to become a harmoniously resonating
structure, that is all the parts work together with the LEAST
possible interference.
Keely refers to the construction of devices that were
"differentiated" or tuned to REMOVE any KNOTS or KINKS in the
material. Removal of these kinks would provide for a "pure"
flow of force THROUGH the structure. This was done in much the
same way that magnets or electrets are now formed.
One or more frequencies are injected into a hot or molten
structure, and allowed to influence the cooling structure. The
Chladni vibrating waveplate is a graphic illustration of what
actually goes on.
The various frequencies cause the mass to take on the form of
a 3 dimensional "map" of the injected signature and thus
polarizes the mass structure to some extent. This polarization
literally creates a physical imprint of the injected patterns.
When considered in this light, we can see how a mass can be
"tuned" to respond to specific frequencies which in turn leads
to other possibilities that go beyond the scope of this paper.
Such tuning can be made to be harmonious (constructive) or
enharmonious (destructive) and when made as perfectly resonant
as possible, the structure could directly interface to the
hyperspace (virtual) field.
This applies to circuits or objects such as a chair, rock, etc.
And since all these frequencies working in conjunction form what
is termed the "signature", one can get an idea of how to
manipulate mass for specific phenomena.
So, if we consider pure resonance as being analogically similar
to a super-conductor (i.e. no resistance), then the overall
efficiencies of such a resonant structure should be 100%
(perpetual motion or unity) OR GREATER (overunity or free
Page 3
energy) because of the "purity of flow" of any energy injected
into it.
This is again analogous to the contentions stated in the file
MAGICSQ, which deals with basic replicating patterns that work
together in a harmonious and therefore REINFORCING overall
matrix for the redirection of force or generation of phenomena.
One of the questions that many people ask is where does this
"free" energy come from? There are several ideas about this.
Some say it is the jitter of all atoms/molecules that is
entrained in a laser like fashion to produce a directed energy,
others say it is a stress impressed on the local space/time
field, while yet others say it is a dimensional transfer from
what is casually termed hyperspace.
There are other, more conventional forms of "free" energy,
including solar, thermodynamic (heat pump) systems, geothermal,
wavepower, windpower, cold fusion, etc., and these are quite
valid and much easier to practically achieve.
Many consider the quest for overunity or scalar type free energy
to be in search of a "perpetual motion device". This could not
be further from the truth. Perpetual motion occurs naturally in
all atoms, simply from the rotation of the electron(s) around
the proton/nucleus and the rotation of planets around the sun,
so WHERE does THAT force come from?
It is simply a matter of understanding the SOURCE of this energy
and HOW TO TAP that source. So, the researchers in this area
discuss various theories and approaches, determine (in some very
creative ways) how to test the theories in a circuit or
mechanical structure and keep working at it. There is little
doubt that MANY OTHERS have actually discoverd how to tap this
source, however, they have become embroiled with investors,
threatened by vested groups or governments or a host of other
reasons, and so many DIED with the secret.
One thing we all hear is sarcastic remarks regarding our
interests and researches in free energy and other "alternative"
studies. There are SO many who are SO brainwashed and not
willing to try to think for themselves. It serves no purpose to
get into dissipative dialogues with these people.
The information is available and most of us will freely discuss
any questions that "outsiders" or "neophytes" have in these
areas. That is about the best we can do UNTIL the working
machines are OUT and suddenly, all the doubters will jump on the
bandwagon, claiming to have been "supporters" all along. Just
so.
The ONLY way such devices will EVER see practical use and with
the minimum of CONTROL, is through the computer networks such as
InterNet, CompuServe and KeelyNet functioning in a sourcing
role coupled with the OPEN SHARING OF INFORMATION as Joel
McClain, Floyd Sweet, William Hyde and many others have done.
This way, when the plans are discovered and FREELY SHARED, they
will be passed onto the much larger global systems as fast as
Page 4
humanly possible, and from there, downloaded, printed and copied
for distribution to the hundreds of thousands of people who
study such subjects (and all this done at MINIMAL cost).
There is little question that we are all being monitored by
governments AND large corporations, indeed, it would be STUPID
of them NOT to monitor our actions. When the actual machines
are built and used, it will change the world in a most
disruptive way, however, change is necessary for growth and
society is notoriously ADAPTIVE.
We foresee practical free energy devices in the next 2 years, IF
NOT SOONER. Joel is an inspiration in this respect because he
not only experiments but openly shares his work.
Some have questioned why such information should be freely GIVEN
to people who have made no expenditures of either time or money.
We understand the feeling and to some degree concur with it,
however, such an attitude serves to quench the sharing of
information which will logically lead to practical working
devices. And since the END RESULT we are ALL seeking is to see
and USE our own personal free energy machine (for starters),
then we cannot accept or support such an attitude.
We too have LONG SUFFERED the lifting of information,
distribution of material at our own cost and other activities
that EXPECTED some people to be TAKERS and not SHARERS. So,
there are snakes in the grass and we must just live with it as a
part of the lower human nature.
So, the best thing we can all do is freely share information
such as this file, pass it around to your own friends and
contacts and don't worry about the USERS. Each of us has a
higher purpose and plays a part in a larger plan.
Should you choose to experiment in this area, we would GREATLY
APPRECIATE your sharing of your findings or improvements, etc.
There are SO MANY people who would actively carry out
experiments if they had a clue as to how to approach the
problem. This file is an excellent starter and your input will
only help to accelerate the INEVITABLE development of practical,
duplicatable free energy machines. Imagine what a world would
come from this! THANKS.....................>>> Jerry
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 5
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/coldfiss.asc
+728
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,728 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : COLDFISS.ASC | Online Date : 12/15/95 |
| Contributed by : Bruce Perrault | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following file is the most fascinating information that has come out in
dozens of years with respect to some of Henry Morays' experiments with the
production of electrical energy using cold cathode chemical reactions.
To get up to speed about Moray's work, please refer to the files MORAY1.ASC
through MORAY4.ASC on KeelyNet.
If you contact Bruce Perrault based on information specified in this document,
please mention you got it from the KeelyNet file COLDFISS. Bruce is looking
for confirmations and people serious about not only duplicating the tube but
EXPANDING the power output. Thanks!!
Bruce Perrault has been experimenting with what he calls COLD FISSION for
several years. His experiments were first brought to the attention of the
International Tesla Society which led to a one hour interview by ITS President
J. W. McGinnis. The following is how Bruce's work came to the attention of
KeelyNet;
Message 1443 DATE/TIME: 11/25/95 18:37
From : JIM SHAFFER -- RECEIVED --
To : JOEL MCCLAIN
Subject: (R) More Moray
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Did you hear the Extraordinary Sciences Hour on November 12th? There's a guy
named Bruce Perault (guessing at the spelling here) who has built Moray-like
devices using ionized chlorine tubes and iron pyrite as the detector. He said
Moray used molybdenum sulfide, but iron pyrite is the second-best thing. The
ITS is selling plans for $39.95, for a device that will cost about $500 to
build. He says he's getting 50KW out of a device weighing about 60 pounds.
----------------------------------------
Message 1471 DATE/TIME: 11/27/95 22:52
From : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
To : ALL
Subject: ITS Free Energy Device
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Hi Folks! After reading a public message (1443), I was so fascinated I had to
call JW McGinnis and find out the truth about it. So here's the story (but
first read message 1443);
...
A fellow named Bruce Perrault claims he has discovered how to build a 'cold
cathode' vacuum tube, similar to the one developed by Henry Moray. Perrault's
tube uses CHLORINE and he claims he has a WORKING prototype which produces 250
Watts. He believes it is scalable and has plans detailing one that might
produce the 50KW which Moray achieved.
...
The plans are being distributed through the International Tesla Society for
$39.95. The order number is 700032. Their voice phone is 719-475-0918, or
800-397-0137 and their FAX is 719-475-0582.
...
JW says this guy contacted him and explained his device, from there JW invited
him to be interviewed on the Extraordinary Science hourly show. He has NOT
seen a working model of this device and the inventor sends the plans to ITS
where they sell them for him. JW says this device will be in the next
Extraordinary Science Journal and they might even do a video of it kind of
like the one Bearden did with Sweets device, where everything is shown,
measurements are made and various devices operated from the produced power....
...
So, if you are interested, go for it, DESPITE what Don Lancaster says, we
CAN'T waste ALL of our time on this 'pseudoscience' stuff....>>> Jerry
----------------------------------------
I ordered the plans from ITS and they arrived this past Thursday. They
consist of a stack of papers about 3/4" thick in a loose folder. Many are
patents relating to energy tapping from the air, thermal and other processes,
a 1956 FATE magazine article about Henry Moray's Radiant Energy Receiver and
how Moray could do transmutations!!!, and the inventor's (Bruce Perrault)
patent for his energy generation system.
At the end of the folder are several papers showing diagrams of how the device
is constructed, another paper describing how the parts are assembled and a
resource list to buy the parts necessary. Though I did not see any power
claims (JW said 250 Watts), it is a fascinating compilation of information to
backup why Perrault's invention should work.
The device consists of an evacuated cylinder with an anode on one end and a
cathode on the other, both separated by sand. The unit is filled with
chlorine gas and ionized by a 4KV pulsetrain. The pulsetrain can be adjusted
to set the frequency of the device, from DC to as high as you want. I suggest
you order the planset, if for no other reason than to support the inventor in
further experiments which he plans to share for quite nominal fees. If there
is sufficient demand, he may even offer kits, maybe even with preconstructed
cylinders, you just attach an ionizer and boom, power comes out of it.
Oh, by the way, he says you just have to tickle it with the high voltage to
begin the pumping action. Once it gets going, the thing runs on its own.
Perrault also indicates power production will degrade over time and the
cylinder will need replacement or rebuilding, although possibly a shot of
fresh chlorine gas might make it run a bit longer.
I thought it VERY SIMILAR to Chernetskii's PLASMATRON, which also uses a
plasma that is pumped with high density magnetic pulses to produce over-unity.
The addition of the chlorine gas is a twist and the inventor indicates these
cylinders can be ganged or scaled up for higher power levels. GET A COPY!
Coincidentally, on Friday, 12/14, I got a phone call from Mr. Perrault because
Bruce Meland, publisher of 'Electrifying Times' (keeps abreast of current
research/technology relating to electric cars and road rally events where they
are tested) (503) 388-1908, had sent him one of the KeelyNet Roundtable
newsletters. That newsletter was VSRTNOV.95, and intrigued Mr. Perrault
enough to want to get a copy of that paper. The quote from the newsletter
follows;
> > > > > < < < < <
...this was preceded by a short review from the Borderlands Journal of the
discoveries of Nathan Stubblefield with 'earth batteries' and how they could
be used to provide electrical energy directly from the earth....Stubblefield
routinely powered a SCORE of CARBON ARC LAMPS 24 hours per day from this
earth battery system. There are numerous other interesting statements in
the article that report on devices which are even now unknown and
misunderstood. Gerry Vassilatos did a marvelous report that could easily be
expanded into a full book to include all the details and pictures that are
still available. If you might want to read this full article and/or
subscribe to Borderlands, backissues are $6.95 and a yearly subscription is
still only $25. Phone (707) 825-7733 or FAX (707) 825-7779. While you are
at it, ask if they might be able to run off a copy of the Farnsworth FUSOR
article published earlier this year.
...Another recent Borderland article from a few months back dealt with the
Farnsworth FUSOR and Multipactor. This unit multiplies electrons by
extracting space energy from the environment for power accumulation. A
recent packet of amazing material was sent to Keelynet, courtesy of Mr.
Steve Hall. Steve works with Charles Yost at Electric Spacecraft Journal
(704) 683-0313, FAX (704) 683-3511, subscription $24 per year.
This incredible information (written by Rodney Sego in May 1981) correlates
the Multipactor with the Moray power generating system. The packet had a
document that I never knew existed and which consisted of an interview with
a close Moray family member (believed to be Chester Todd) who recounted all
that he had seen from the original Moray experiments to the final version.
As a result, this document will wind up as a new Moray file to be placed on
KeelyNet and transferred to the InterNet for Bill Beaty's Science page.
The document provides details on power generation by the use of radioactive
elements to produce an ionized area from alpha emissions and in conjunction
with electron multiplier technology as used in the Multipactor. Everything
points to a means of using an extremely minute excitation current to
stimulate a very large power production. Floyd Sweets VTA also used this
phenomenon.
> > > > > < < < < <
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I find it REMARKABLY coincidental how the Moray document, kindly shared with
KeelyNet by Steve Hall and bearing a November 3rd postmark, preceded the email
comment by Jim Shaffer letting us all know about the November 12th Perrault
radio interview with ITS president J.W. McGinnis.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the VSRTDEC.95 Roundtable newsletter;
Mr. Perrault says he has successfully operated his energy tube for 7 months
outputting 200 Watts before it gave out. A platinum wire was used as the
resistive element to load the circuit. Bruce says it is a slow fission
process and has given KeelyNet FULL permission to post his plans online as
well as pass them to computer networks through the country. A very nice guy
and we are exchanging information and contacts that will be shared with
everyone.
Bruce says he just wants the plans out to everyone and they will soon be
selling the tubes, beginning with basic low energy versions and slowly
progressing to more powerful versions as people get involved in experimenting
and supporting this type of research. The advanced tube construction will
remain a trade secret and available through a future distribution network.
The main thing now is to let people know what is going on and how the thing
works, with support from others who have duplicated it. An excellent
approach! Speaking just for myself, I think Bruce would appreciate some
donations to help him along. He is very sincere and when you see the info,
YOU WILL BE IMPRESSED, especially as others post their successful
replications!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because of the importance of this information and with the FULL PERMISSION OF
Mr. Perrault, KeelyNet is providing the construction details in this document
in ASCII file form AND with additional .GIF drawings to ensure accurate
reproduction of the information.
The files will be : COLDFISS.ASC - this construction and part source file
COLDFISA.GIF - the cold fission tube layout
COLDFISB.GIF - ionizer circuit diagram
(it might be after Christmas before the .GIFs are available)
COLDFISS.ZIP - all the above files in .ZIP form
We will post additional information as it comes in.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the patent application that Bruce Perrault was planning to file.
Perrault, Bruce.................November 16th, 1993
METHOD OF UTILIZING RADIANT ENERGY FOR THE
GENERATION OF EFFICIENT ELECTRICAL ENERGY AND DEVICE
Inventor : Bruce A. Perrault, Mad River Road, Thornton, New Hampshire 03223
References Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
Number Name Date
685,957...........N. Tesla............Nov. 5, 1901
685,958...........N. Tesla............Nov. 5, 1901
1,540,998...........H. Plauson..........June 9, 1925
4,368,416...........James, deceased.....January 11, 1983
Other References
Primary Batteries (1891), Shelford Bidwell's Battery pg. 113
Direct Conversion of Energy (1964), by William R. Corliss pp. 28-29
(the above articles will be posted on KeelyNet early in 1996)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract
A method is disclosed for generating electrical energy, including a new and
novel device. The device includes electropositive and electronegative
electrodes. The electrodes are provided with electrical connections leading
to the electrodes.
A sufficient amount of radiant energy applied to a reactive gas causes the gas
to react ELECTROCHEMICALLY with the electropositive electrode. This causes an
electrical current to flow between the electropositive and electronegative
electrodes. An electronic circuit is used to absorb and convert the generated
electric current.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
METHOD OF UTILIZING A RADIANT ENERGY FOR THE GENERATION OF EFFICIENT
ELECTRICAL ENERGY AND DEVICE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a device for the conversion of radiant energy
to electrical energy and more particularly, to the utilization of GAS
IONIZATION to effect an electrochemical reaction. This device absorbs radiant
energies emitted by natural or synthetic reactions, more particularly to a
device and method that provides improved performance over prior art converters
that convert radiant energies into electrical power.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are devices that convert radiant energy to electrical current, with poor
results.
U.S. Patent Nos. 685,957 and 685,958 issued both patents on November 5, 1901,
utilizes air-borne ionized particles to charge an electrical capacitor. The
accumulated ions jump a spark-gap and discharge through a load. One
difficulty known to exist with this system is the low useable energy that
develops.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Patent No. 1,540,998 issued June 9, 1925, calls for increased collecting
surfaces of electrical capacitors, in an attempt to capture more energy. Yet
another method converts high voltage and low current strength to voltages more
suitable and of greater current. This system is impractical because of the
required cumbersome balloons and collectors involved.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atomic batteries generate electric currents by the disintegration of
radioactive substances. William R. Corliss discusses the direct use of
ionized particles expelled by radioisotopes in his report; Direct Conversion
of Energy (1964) pp. 28-29. In this report high-velocity ionized negative
particles emitted by strontium-90 creates a current of ionized particles.
The charge on the particles becomes neutralized by a metallic cylinder. The
neutralized particles will find their way back to the strontium-90 becoming
again ionized. This cycle repeats itself so long as the strontium-90 remains
radioactive. The power generated by this method does not create USEABLE
amounts of electrical energy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thermionic and thermoelectric energy conversion are discussed in U.S. Patent
No. 4,368,416 - James, deceased January 11, 1983. One limitation known to
exist with converters of this type is the relatively large heat source
required to produce electrical power.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear reactors generate heat by burning UO2. This material is sensitive to
X-ray energy. When the UO2 is exposed to X-ray energy it emits
photoelectrons. The photoelectrons cause a chemical reaction. Present day
nuclear reactors use a natural source of X-ray energy, called U235. This
reaction produces heat. This heat boils water that produces steam.
The steam powers a turbine which in turn generates electricity. This type of
energy generator requires complex building materials that make this method
quite costly. Consumers have paid billions of dollars to build these power
plants. Furthermore no one seems to know what to do with the waste products
produced by these power plants. The U235 breaks up forming highly toxic
radioisotopes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Despite the prior art that exists in this technology, it is believed that
previously there has not existed a small, compact electrical device capable of
generating usable levels of power. It is the object of this invention to
provide a method embodying an improved device to furnish efficient electrical
power to a load.
The present invention removes limitations of past attempts to harness radiant
energies. Toxis radioisotopes are not formed in the present invention. The
primary object of the present invention is to provide a direct method for
converting radiant energy to electrical energy, and a new and novel device fo
converting radiant energy with high efficiencies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Thus in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of
utilizing ionized particles for the generation of efficient electrical energy.
In the present invention, new and novel improvements are apparent. The need
for an enormous collector surface no longer exists. Transistors can now
replace the outdated spark gap and or high vacuum transmission tubes. The
present invention efficiently converts ionizing energy to voltages suitable
for practical usage.
A source of X-ray energy is provided by the present invention. This source
can be artificially generated and will not produce toxic radioisotopes.
Converted energy in the present invention may be directly available for
driving motors, lighting, production of heat and used in electrochemistry.
The method of the invention includes, means for exposing a REACTIVE GAS, such
as CHLORINE to a source of ionizing energy.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent
from the following description of the preferred embodiment of the present
invention, with references to the attached drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a block diagram of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a diagram showing the present invention being exposed to a source
of ionizing energy of extreme voltage and of short duration.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Thus in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a radiant
energy converter comprising a first metallic electrode made of ZINC METAL and
a second metallic electrode made of IRON SULFIDE nested parallel to the first
electrode.
A number of electrode couples may be used and still not depart from the spirit
of this invention. The inter-electrode spacing contains the reactive gas
CHLORINE. A number of gasses MAY BE USED and still not depart from the spirit
of this invention. Means are also provided, at the end of the electrodes, to
provide external electrical leads from the electrodes to a load circuit.
The method to generate electrical energy also includes, with a device just
described, means for exposing the internal reactive gas to a radiant energy
source of sufficient strength.
The conversion of radiant energy to useful electrical energy is apparent. The
small solid-state components of this apparatus make it a practical compact
unit. An electronic circuit effects energy absorption.
The electronegative electrode may contain oxygen gas in the form of a solid.
Manganese dioxide may be used for this purpose. The electropositive electrode
may contain hydrogen gas in the form of a solid. Lithium hydride may be used
for this purpose.
The gasses react when the inter-electrode spacing of these electrodes is
subjected to radiant energy pulses. The gasses become SUPER CONDUCTIVE. This
causes the oxygen and hydrogen gasses to react chemically with minute energy
loss. Chemical energy is now converted to electrical energy with extreme
efficiency. Furthermore, an electrical transformer can be utilized to
transform this electromotive energy to a usable voltage.
Referring now to FIG. 1 of the drawings,
(1) consists of a gas tight vessel. Provision is made for an inlet tube (2)
to introduce chlorine gas (3). Provision is made for iron sulfide electrode
(4) and zinc electrode (5).
ANY NUMBER of electrode couples, or gas combinations may be utilized and still
not depart from the spirit of this invention. A source of ionization (6) is
provided.
The chlorine gas (3) must become ionized in order for it to bombard the
electrode (5). When the chlorine gas (3) is ionized it becomes a conductor,
its conductivity is a measure of its ionization.
There are a number of ways to ionize the chlorine gas (3). X-ray energies
emitted from the sun will ionize the chlorine gas (3). Radioactive materials
will ionize the chlorine gas (3). Pulsating high-voltage produced by an
electrical transformer will ionize the chlorine gas (3).
Any number of ionizing sources may be utilized and still not depart from the
spirit of my invention. I stake my claim to the method of power generation.
If an electronic ionizing source (6) is used, once started, the energy
produced by said invention will keep the electronic circuit energized.
Initially the electronic circuit must be PRIMED by an outside power source
(7). When said invention begins generating electrical energy the external
source (7) IS NO LONGER NEEDED. A small rechargeable battery may be used as
the external source (7). Said invention will keep the external source (7)
fully charged.
Greater amounts of energy can be stored in a compact manner than any
previously known electrochemical system. Furthermore, if radiant energy is
used as the ionizing source its energy is converted into electrical power.
The voltage from said invention is very stable. The output can be varied from
a non-pulsating, direct current, to a high frequency pulsating output. The
output pulsation rate is varied by the rate in which the electronic ionizing
source (6) pulsates.
The pulsation rate of the ionizing source (6) is determined by its circuit
characteristics. These characteristics are well known in the engineering
field. Any number of known electronic circuits may be utilized for the
electronic ionizing source (6) and still not depart from the spirit of said
invention. If the ionizing source comes from radiant energy the pulse rate is
a factor in the decay rate.
* This invention may use a resistant FABRIC dielectric woven to serve as a
strong mechanical separator, at the same time sufficiently porous to
PERMIT CIRCULATION of the gasses between electrodes. Fabrics made of
borosilicate (PYREX) fibers are particularly suitable for this invention.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 1 - Cold Fission generator layout
(the left side of the diagram is off the page on my copy, but it appears
to be related to the transformer POWER TAP from the system via the
transformer and bridge rectifier)
_______
Antenna==> \ /
\ /
____________________________|
| | |
| | |
_____________ | ___|___ |
| | | | | |
| Prime | | |_____| |
| Source | | | | |
|___________| | | | |
| + plus | | | |
------------------*----------------| | |<==Radiant |
______|______ | | Energy |
| | | | Tube |
| Tube |__________ | | |
| Ionizer | | |_____| |
|___________| | | | |
| | |_____| |
| | | |
__________________| | | |
| | |__________|____ |
| ___|___ 250KV pulse | ___ |
| _____ | / | |
| ___ |____|/|____|
| _ | /| | |
ACin \ | / |
|------ | -----------/ | Variable |
/ \ / \ _____________________| Capacitor |
__ / \ __| greater / / |
(+) \ / (-) turns * * <== few turns coil |
\ / coil ==>\ \_________________________________|
| bridge rect. /
|---------------------\ <=== Transformer
ACin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 2 - Construction diagram of the Radiant Energy Tube
__
chlorine gas __ | |<==iron center electrode
(2) Inlet tube===>| | | |
_|__|____| |_________
|| | | || <==fine sand or porous
PVC end cap==>||________| |________|| dielectric material
|| | | ||
|| | | || <==(4) iron sulfide
||________|__|________|| electrode
| | (iron pyrite)
| |
(1) PVC tube===>| | <==(3) chlorine gas
| | throughout
| |
| |
| | <==this space is FILLED
| | with FINE SAND or a
| | porous dielectric
| | material
| |
|____________________|
|| | | ||
|| | | || <==(5) zinc electrode
PVC end cap==>||________| |________||
|| | | ||
||________| |________|| <==fine sand or porous
| | dielectric material
|---| |
| |__| <==iron center electrode
|
_____|_____
| Tube |
(6)==>| Ionizer |
|_________|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ionizer Circuit
Pulse/Frequency Driver section - 120VAC version
____ 1N4006 _______ resistor
\______| |____________| \|__________| R1 |________________\ V+
/ | | | | /| | |_______| /
120VAC | | | diode |
in | | __|__ __|__ (+)
\______| |__ / \ _____ 10uF
/ |____| | /_____\1N4006 | (-) 350V R1 adjusts pulse
1:2 xformer | | | repitition rate
voltage |______\ ____________| Start with 1K 15W,
doubler / | if flashtube does
| __|__ (+) not get hot, it is
| _____ 10uF OK to reduce R1
| | (-) 350V
| |
|______________|____________________________\ GND
/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pulse/Frequency Driver section - CMOS version
_________ +12VDC
_______| 4.7k ohm|____ |
| |_________| | _______| ______\
| | |370uF | | /
| | __|__ 16V | | V+
| | _____ | __|__
| | \ (invert) | | \ (invert) | | / \ 1N4006
|______| \/\________|______| \ /\____ | | /___\
| | /\/ | / \/ | | _|___ |
| | / | / _|_ | | |__|
| CD4584 CD4584 | | | |xform|Allegro
| | | | | |Cor2 or Cor3
___|___ 1.5k | | | |_____|_____
_____ resistor|___| | | |
_ | | _| |
| | / |
|___/ \_|/ TIP 31A |
| |\ heat sinked |
| V__ |
| | |
| | |
|________ \ ______|__/GND
/ \
___|___
___
_
In an additional phone conversation with Bruce on Friday, December 15th, he
said the pulses were very sharp spikes and occurred 20 times per second. This
is based on a comment by Henry Moray in his book "The Sea of Energy". These
spikes are necessary to maintain the fission reaction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High Voltage section
___ Ultra
| |----> High
| | Voltage
\_______________________________________________| | Output
/ | | trigger | | |
_|_ 4.7M ohms _|_ xformer__ | | |<==auto ignition
| |<=resistor | | | |\ | |___| coil
| | | | | | \ | |
|_| resistor=>|_| | | \| |
_______| 1M ohms |---------|___| |\ 4kv |
| | | | | \ out |
| _|_ __|__ | | \ _|_
| / * \ NE-2 _____ SCR _|_a | \|_| xenon
| \_*_/ neon .1uF| 4A / \ __|__(+) | | flash-tube
__|__ | tube 250V| /\___/ _____ |*|
_____ | | / g | c |22uF |_|
| .1uF |______________ \ __/ 400V | |350V |
| 600V / | | |
\__|_____________________|___________|_______|________|
/ ground |
__|__ earth or
/ / / house wiring
ground
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 16th, 1988 - Bruce A. Perrault
_________________________________________________________
____|___|______|_____ | _____|______|___|____
Copper |___|______|__________________|________________|______|___| Zinc
Rod | | | Rod
|_|_|
A.C.
* I have found it advantageous to introduce CHLORINE GAS to the tube. A
high voltage electrostatic field renders the tube CONDUCTIVE. When the
tube becomes conductive, it PRODUCES ENERGY. -- November 20th, 1992
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
Radiant Energy tube Ionizer
Assemble as shown in the circuit diagrams. The auto ignition coil as a
transformer and choke. A choke will store energy in its windings as a
capacitor does.
In this device the ignition coil absorbs energy when a xenon flash-lamp is
triggered into conduction. The flash-lamp behaves like an open circuit with
infinite resistance until it is triggered. The flash-lamp is triggered by way
of a small, lightweight transformer that supplies a 4,000 volt pulse to the
lamp. This pulse is capacitively coupled to the xenon gas inside the lamp.
This pulse initiates lamp conduction. The xenon, once ionized by the 4KV
pulse, suddenly behaves like a switch of only a fraction of an ohm. This
allows the coil to energize.
When the 4KV is removed the flash-lamp returns to its infinite resistance
state, it is again an open switch. Energy that is stored in the ignition
coils primary windings discharge across the lamp. This results in a moving
magnetic field that induces a series of high voltage surges from the secondary
windings of the coil.
This is an electronic device that generates AT LEAST 250,000 volts. DO NOT
HANDLE this device unless you are familiar with high-voltage safety
precautions. This device is POTENTIALLY dangerous.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Radiant Energy Tube
Dimensions of these tubes are NOT critical. However, you must PACK DOWN the
powders HARD.
I have found that raw iron pyrite ORE serves well as the collector (anode) of
energy in these tubes. Platinum and Palladium absorb MORE energy but they are
too expensive. Iron pyrite ore works quite well and is inexpensive when
bought in bulk. Pure zinc metal serves well as the emitter (cathode)
material. Magnesium will work better but it is UNSTABLE and probably will
explode. Do not use magnesium metal as your emitter material. Lithium
Hydride as the emitter material will work best but it is expensive.
Chlorine gas is added to the tubes LAST. You must make the tubes AIR-TIGHT.
All the air must be sucked out before the chlorine gas is introduced. This
vacuum is not critical. The chlorine gas is now allowed to fill the vacuum
tube. Ambient pressure is fine. Make sure the tubes are SEALED WELL.
You can buy bottled chlorine gas but be prepared to go through bureaucratic
red tape. To avoid this hassle you must generate this gas yourself. Calcium
Hypochlorite (swimming pool chlorinator) will release chlorine gas when water
is added to it. Make sure that you are working in a well-ventilated area when
generating this gas.
Chlorine gas can accumulate in your lungs forming hydrochloric acid. This
would cause SERIOUS lung damage. Severe exposure could BE FATAL. So take the
proper precautions and respect this material. You must contain the Calcium
Hypochlorite in a closed vessel. This vessel must have a valve and small
diameter rubber delivery hose that connects to the tubes.
I have used pvc-tubing as my containing vessel. Make sure that you have a
pressure gage built into your gas generating container. Pvc-tubing should not
exceed 100PSI of pressure. This is the limit established by the manufacturers
of pvc-tubing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priming your Radiant Energy Converter
You may prime this device a number of ways. You can use a 110 volt to 220
volt step-up transformer supplied by a 110 volt wall outlet, or you can build
the 12 volt DC inverter circuit and power it with a car battery. You may even
prime the circuit with static electricity.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacing the Radiant Energy tubes
How long will the tubes last? This will depend on the type of emitter
material used. A new shot of chlorine gas MAY bring them back to life. There
is no doubt in my mind that one of you will find better materials to lengthen
the life of the tubes. There are materials that I would like to try but
finances have not permitted this at this time.
Hopefully there will be enough interest in this power generator so that I may
continue my research with the device. I am confident that the tubes could be
made to last a long time before needing to be replaced.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources for Construction Materials
PVC-tubing, sealant, fittings, nuts and bolts
These materials may be obtained from your local hardware store.
Chlorine gas source may be obtained from Calcium Hypochlorite
This material may be purchased from your local hardware or swimming pool
supply stores. Ask for a chlorinator for swimming pools.
Ignition Coil
Can be bought at any automotive parts store.
Electronic parts
They can be bought from your local Radio Shack.
Cathode and anode materials, vacuum-pump and gage, radiant energy tube ionizer
These items can be purchased from:
Nu Energy Horizons
Route 175, Box 445
Campton, NH 03223
Cathode material consists of 99.9% pure - 100 mesh zinc metal.
$11.95 per 1/2 lb. Stock #chemzn
Anode material consists of raw iron pyrite ore
$14.95 per 1 lb. Stock #chemfiss
Corrosion Resistant Vacuum/Pressure Pump
$99.00 20" Hg max. vacuum -- 18 PSI max pressure Stock #dpump
3" Compound Vacuum/Pressure Gage
$39.95 Range 30" Hg vacuum to 30 PSI for air and gases Stock #dgage
Completely assemble RADIANT ENERGY tube ionizer
$149.95 Stock #degi
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Bulk orders are available
** Kits may be offered at a later date. If you would like to be informed
when kits are offered, please send a postcard with your name and address
to the Nu Energy Horizons address above.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you choose to experiment with this device, please;
1) Be careful
2) Share your results with others
3) Inform Bruce Perrault of your progress at the Nu Horizons address
Thanks!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/coldfus1.asc
+132
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
May 1, 1991
COLDFUS1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This interesting file uploaded to KeelyNet courtesy of
Jim Shaffer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From the Williamsport, PA _Sun-Gazette_, April 25 1991:
FIRM CLAIMS COLD FUSION MYSTERY SOLVED
Lancaster Company's Assertion Disputed
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) -- A Pennsylvania company claims to have solved
the puzzle of cold fusion.
Mills Technologies, of Lancaster, Pa., claims to have determined a
non-nuclear mechanism for the purported phenomenon reported at the
University of Utah two years ago. Mills also says it has made the
effect reproducible.
The company attributes the effect to a previously unknown reaction
that creates a new, smaller form of hydrogen.
The explanation disputes much of the quantum mechanical theory that
has guided nuclear scientists most of this century, and was greeted
with some skepticism by other scientists.
"Basically, we have both the theoretical and practical aspects
solved," Mills' owner, Randell L. Mills, said in a telephone
interview Wednesday.
The company scheduled a news conference in Lancaster today.
Mills said his company of about a half-dozen employees has built its
own cells that have produced up to 40 times the electrical energy
put in.
He also said the heat production works with ordinary water as well
as heavy water, and it does not require a palladium electrode.
University of Utah researchers Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann
stumbled on to the process "by serendipity" and they were wrong in
their assumption that nuclear reactions were creating the excess
heat, Mills said.
But since hydrogen from ordinary water is the fuel, the prospects
for use as an energy source are still very good, he said.
Page 1
Mills also said the effect is "100 percent reproducible" and the
company has applied for patents worldwide. Reproducibility has been
a major hindrance in the acceptance of the phenomena.
Under the theory, the electrons in hydrogen atoms drop to previously
unknown energy levels below the "ground state" thought to be the
lowest level under conventional quantum mechanics. Dropping to
these lower levels requires a release of energy as heat.
A paper is to be published in the August issue of the Journal of
Fusion Technology, where a number of cold-fusion-related articles
have appeared, Mills said. He will speak on the work at the August
meeting of the American Chemical Society in New York City.
Fritz Will, director of the National Cold Fusion Institute at the
University of Utah, was out of the country. Haven Bergeson, who
directs the physics group for the institute, said he was unfamiliar
with Mills and his work and could not comment on its specifics.
"On the surface, it seems like an unlikely idea," Bergeson said.
"It's a line of thinking that I don't think any of us have
followed."
John Huizenga, a University of Rochester nuclear chemist who co-
chaired the Department of Energy's cold-fusion review panel, said he
also knew nothing of the work, but thought it difficult to take the
claim seriously at this point.
Huizenga, who has previously said that cold fusion would require "a
succession of miracles," said the Mills work appears to be more
willingness to surrender a well-accepted and proven theory for the
sake of sketchy experimental evidence.
"When surprise upon surprise upon surprise comes along, one has to
be very careful," he said.
Mills said his company was formed in 1986 as a research-oriented
business. He said his background includes a bachelor's degree in
chemistry and a medical degree from Harvard University. He also
studied electrical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/coldfus2.asc
+396
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,396 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
May 5, 1991
COLDFUS2.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file courteously supplied to KeelyNet by Mike Vest.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The following was taken off of the National Science Echo from
Fidonet. Someone should call Mills Technology, and see if we can
get their paper now.. Onward, Resonant Warriors... Mike Vest
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Cold Fusion Lecture - broad new theory
WASHINGTON (UPI) -- Two physicists said Thursday they had developed
a theory that could explain some of the puzzling phenomena
persistently produced by disputed ``cold fusion'' experiments.
The experiments did not produce excess energy through nuclear
fusion, but instead by a new type of nuclear reaction that
scientists say could possibly harness to produce power, said
Michigan physicists Frederick Mayer and John Reitz.
The reaction may result from production of a new type of particle
dubbed a ``hydron,'' which could interract with metal to produce a
nuclear reaction at room temperature, they said.
The pair described the theory at a news conference in Boston, one
day after presenting a paper published in the Journal of Fusion
Technology at a seminar at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
in Cambridge, Mass.
Lawrence Lidsky, a nuclear engineer at MIT who attended the seminar,
said the theory was interesting but needed to be confirmed by
experiments.
'`Nobody ran out of the room screaming, 'He's got it,''' Lidsky
said. ``It's interesting but the theory makes a lot of assumptions
and requires several leaps of faith.''
One of the appealing aspects of the theory, however, is that it
should be able to be tested fairly easily, he said.
``There are some nifty tests that could be done to see if the theory
is correct or not that should be fairly definitive,'' he said.
Meanwhile, Mills Technologies of Lancaster, Pa., (see COLDFUS1.ZIP
on KeelyNet) also held a news conference Thursday to claim the
``cold fusion'' results were actually from a non-nuclear reaction
Page 1
that produces energy through the contraction of hydrogen atoms.
Company president Randell Mills said Fusion Technology had agreed to
publish a paper describing his work, which would be presented at a
meeting of the American Chemical Society in New York in August.
Chemists B. Stanley Pons and Norman Fleischmann created a worldwide
uproar in 1989 when they announced that they had produced nuclear
fusion in a simple experiment at room temperature at the University
of Utah.
Scientists had thought enormous pressure and very high temperatures
would be needed to produce fusion -- the reaction that powers the
sun that researchers have been trying to harness as an energy
source.
Pons and Fleischmann's claims largely have been discredited. But
some scientists have continued to report detecting hints of a
possible nuclear reaction produced by the experiments that they
could not explain.
Pons and Fleischmann's experiment involved running electricity
through jars containing rods made of the metal palladium and a form
of water that has an extra hydrogen atom.
The pair theorized the electrical current drove deuterium atoms in
the water into the palladium until the deuterium became so tightly
packed the atoms fused -- releasing excess energy.
In the new theory, deuterium could react with metals like palladium
to form unstable neutral particles dubbed ``hydrons,'' which then
could react with the palladium in a nuclear reaction that produces
excess heat.
``What he's saying is people were looking for the wrong reaction.
It's not a form of fusion but a form of nuclear reaction,'' Lidsky
said.
``If it were true, it would explain a number of phenomena that are
puzzling,'' he said, adding: ``Can you use this to make power? Lord
knows.'' Mayer is president of Mayer Applied Research Inc. in Ann
Arbor.
Reitz is an Ann Arbor consultant who taught physics at Case Western
Reserve University from 1954 to 1965.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Cold Fusion Lecture
broad new theory Theory Suggests Cold Fusion May Be Real
by John Travis
Perhaps rewakening a controversy which stunned the world over two
years ago, a Michigan physicist yesterday at MIT presented a broad
new theory that may explain the sporadic and puzzling results of
cold fusion experiments, as well addressing other intriguing
problems such as excess planetary heat and the presence of tritium
in volcanic emissions.
Page 2
In 1989, two Utah chemists shocked the scientific community with
their announcement of room-temperature fusion-in-a-bottle.
Attempts to duplicate the experiment proved largely unsuccessful,
prompting most researchers to dimiss the original report and the few
others that followed as incorrect. Still, in the face of strong
skepticism and even disdain from the majority of physicists, a small
band of believers have continued to experiment and have reported
some unusual results.
Speaking before a small audience at a lecture sponsored by MIT's
Laboratory for Nuclear Science, Dr. Frederic J. Mayer, a plasma
physicist with his own company in Ann Arbor, MI, detailed a paper,
appearing in next month's issue of Fusion Technology, that attempts
to explain the experimental inconsistencies that have been observed
over the past 24 months.
Fusion, the process which powers the sun, has a number of
established pathways, the most common being the collison of two
hydrogen atoms which produces a helium atom and a burst of energy,
However, this new theory bypasses fusion reactions and proposes a
novel energy-producing nuclear reaction that involves a new class of
atomic particles not yet directly detected.
Mayer's paper, co-authored with theoretical physicist Dr. John R.
Reitz, suggests that the excess heat and other nuclear products
detected in various cold fusion experiments are not the result of
fusion, but instead a reaction involving an isotope switch.
Isotopes are atoms that are chemically identical, but have different
numbers of neutrons. For example, carbon has a number of isotopes.
A carbon atom may have up to twelve or more neutrons in its various
isotopic forms.
An isotope that is stripped of a neutron, or picks ups one, can
often release energy. These reactions, which Mayer calls Resonant
Direct Nuclear Reactions, may be the explanation for the cold fusion
phenomenon, according to the new theory.
There are a number of these isotope reactions, many of them occuring
in metals that have been accused of contaminating cold fusion
experiments. Since the level of contamination can vary widely, Mayer
suggests this may be one explanation for the irreproducibity of many
experiments.
"The primary nuclear actions are not the conventional d-d fusion
reactions, but are RDNRs," Mayer told the gathered audience, "The
contaminants are driving the system."
Mayer divides the RDNRs into two categories, tritium producers and
tritium consumers. Tritium is an extremely rare isotope of the
hydrogen atom which normally has a single proton.
(An isotope is one of two or more nuclides that have the same
number of protons in their nuclei.
Atomic hydrogen has one electron and one proton, the two
"normal" isotopes of hydrogen are Deuterium (mass number 2,
Page 3
also known as HEAVY WATER) and Tritium (mass number
3 and radiocative)......Vangard)
Tritium, in addition to the positively charged proton, has two extra
neutrons in the nucleus and has been accused of being another
contaminant in the experiments.
In Mayer's isotope switch, tritium is converted to deuterium,
another form of hydrogen that has a single neutron plus the proton,
or vice-versa.
When tritium is transformed into deuterium, a freed neutron is
available for a metal atom, creating two isotope switches overall.
The metal, perhaps platinum or uranium, can also lose a neutron,
allowing a deuterium atom to be converted to tritium. It is the
isotope switch in the metals that release the excess energy.
While the process appears simple and obvious, there is an obstacle
most physicists thought prevented such nuclear reactions--the
Coulomb barrier.
This barrier is similar to the repulsion that magnets can have with
each other and occurs when particles of similar charge are brought
together. The tritium, or deuterium, must be very close to the metal
atoms before they can trade neutrons.
Yet, the positive proton is repulsed by the large number of
similarly charged protons in the metal atoms and the reactions are
prevented from occuring.
But, as Mayer explains in the most controversial part of the new
theory, the proton in the the tritium or deuterium can be
neutralized, which allows the atoms to evade the Coulomb barrier and
procede with their resonant direct nuclear reactions (RDNRs).
To perform this magic, Mayer and Reitz have theorized a new class of
particles they call "hydrons" or virtual particles (the second name
is avoided since it has been used for other atomic particles as
well).
According to Mayer, a hydron is an unstable, compact neutral
particle that sometimes occurs when an electron interacts with a
proton.
In effect, the electron and proton cancel each other out, creating a
"virtual" neutron. If the proton in tritium can be neutralized in
this way, the Coulumb barrier would no longer be an impediment and
the nuclear reactions would occur.
However, these hydrons have not been directly observed and many in
the audience were unconvinced that such a proton-electron
interaction could exist. Mayer could offer only indirect evidence
for the hydrons, but pointed out they provided the best explanation
for the variety of experimental data.
"Small compact objects that are neutral appear from the data to be
present in nature," said Mayer, "A compact object like this could
solve a lot of problems."
Page 4
The absence of certain helium isotopes and gamma radiation have been
key arguments against cold fusion proponents, since the two are
typically produced in the accepted fusion pathways.
However, the new theory offers numerous routes in which no radiation
would be expected, and none of the reactions would produce helium.
This fact may help solve another, older mystery involving the Earth
itself. Only about half of the earth's interior energy, geothermal
heat, can be accounted for from measurements of helium.
Mayer suggested these new reactions may account for the extra heat,
as well as explaining why the ratio of helium isotopes is different
for geothermal gases than the ratio found in the galaxy. Jupiter,
which emits twice as much heat as can be explained presently, is
another area where hydrons may be involved.
Observations of volcanic emissions have also been found to have
large anounts of tritium, more than can be explained from the normal
fusion rate at the volcanoe's temperature. Tritium-producing RDNRs
may explain the excess, according to Mayer.
The broad scope of the theory is one the reasons it is so
attractive, said Mayer. It is not just limited to explaining cold
fusion phenomenon, but many other scientific puzzles.
In fact, the strongest evidence for the new theory may come from
other fusion experiments at Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Scientists there are studying a process known as Cluster Impact
Fusion in which they shoot deuterium atoms at titanium foil. Charged
particles measured during the experiment appear to match one of the
isotope reactions proposed by Mayer and Reitz.
Another puzzle that may back-up the new theory is the diffusivity of
hydrogen into metals. This is a well-recognized problem that
embrittles the metals.
The hydrons, in addition to being neutral, would be extremely small
and could seep into metals much more effectively than similar atoms
like oxygen or nitrogen. Since the hydrons are short-lived, they
would convert back ("go normal" in Mayer's words) taking up a larger
volume. And since the hydrons are now inside the metal, this
increase could cause cracking, a possible explanation for the
metal's brittleness.
Mayer's audience at the lecture included Peter Hagelstein, a
theoretician at MIT who had provided one of the first possible
explanations for cold fusion almost two years ago.
While intrigued with the new theory, Hagelstein was not yet
persuaded that hydrons could exist. The mathematical proof of them
would be difficult, he said.
Mayer agreed but pointed out one of the benefits of the hydron
explanation was a number of obvious experimental tests that could be
done to either support or contradict the theory. Repeating some of
the cold fusion experiments, with deliberate and controlled
contamination of the metals, would be an excellent start, according
to Mayer.
Page 5
Concluding his lecture, Mayer answered what he said was the most
obvious question -- does the theory suggest a large scale nuclear
energy source. While refusing to speculate on the actual method,
Mayer simply responded, "I think there is."
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 6
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/coldmhd.asc
+330
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
November 15, 1993
COLDMHD1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Norm Wootan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Message 3083 DATE/TIME: 11/10/93 07:17
From : NORMAN WOOTAN
To : ALL
Subject: Plasma MHD
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
We all should thank Joel McLain for finding the 4TH State of Matter
book and sharing it with us. I have read the file with a great deal
of interest since I have been in the past, and am currently
researching a plasma based system of over-unity power production.
The KeelyNet was established for the purpose of sharing this type of
information and provides a channel of comments, observations and
often critique. A sort of peer review on a friendly basis. The MHD
application referred to in the 4THSTATE.ASC file is not an over-
unity device for several reasons that I will go into in greater
detail as we go along.
First, the MHD generator produced 30 Megawatts of which 10 Megawatts
was plowed back into the device to maintain the necessary magnetic
flux densities in the copper coils. Nothing is said in the text
about the energy expenditure needed to heat the plasma nor propel it
through the flux field to produce a current.
When we talk about the advantages of using superconducting magnets
in this type of application we must take into account the TOTAL
ENERGEY OUTLAY to determine if we have an over-unity application.
All we hear about the Super Conducting Super Collider is that it
uses cryogenic cooled magnets to control and contain the particle
path within the 52 mile ring. Just think about the fact that the
Cryogenic system to achieve supercondtivity in the SSC would have
cost over a BILLON dollars for it is an intergral part of each
magnet section plus there was going to be built on site the world's
largest facility for the production of liquid helium and liquid
hydrogen which is the secondary coolant in the system.
Extensive expense went into the emergency venting and gas escape
system needed when the dreaded Quenching problem arises from time to
time. Quenching is the term applied to the particle beam getting
out of it's containment field and striking the magnetic coils
causing instant heating and cryogenic gas boiling and expansion
Page 1
which is the same as the explosive expansion of steam.
When superconductivity is mentioned everyone thinks that this
phenomena is magical and occurs at no additional cost: WRONG . The
cryogenic cost of maintaining superconductivity must be entered into
the over-unity equation if this is what we are trying to determine.
If you are a GOVERNMENT project then totally disregard all these
trivial expenses. Do you realize that the Commanche Peak Power
station will cost more than the SSC and eventually all utility rate
payers will foot the entire expense through utility rate increases?
I make the above comments from a very informed basis for in my files
I have all of the Patents that apply to MHD power generation
including the ones on Plasma MHD. I also have all the Patents on
Hot Fussion using Plasma. Due to on line time constraints I will
share with everyone some interesting experiments that I have
conducted with MHD in a subsequent message.
Again, thank you Joel for sharing the 4th State info with us. Your
friend Norm.
----------------------------------------
There has been a Reply to this message, use [+] to Read the most
recent.
Msg # 3083 [1..3254] [R]eply, [F]orward, [K]ill, [P]rivate,
[+]See Reply, [M]ove, [E]dit, [Q]uit, [ENTER] for Next Message ?
====================================================================
Message 3087 DATE/TIME: 11/10/93 10:58
From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED --
To : NORMAN WOOTAN
Subject: (R) Plasma MHD
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Sure thing, Norm. I've always enjoyed our conversations, and I
admire the work you're doing. Some of the other MENTOR books also
might have some interesting info, as well, and if I can track them
down, I'll upload reviews of them as well.
Hard to say how much MHD has progressed in the past 20+ years, but
I'd guess it's on-line in quite a few places where cameras are NOT
allowed. CUL (see you later)
Joel
----------------------------------------
This is a Reply, use [-] to Read the Original.
Msg # 3087 [1..3254] [R]eply, [F]orward, [K]ill, [P]rivate,
[-]See Orig, [M]ove, [E]dit, [Q]uit, [ENTER] for Next Message ? 3088
====================================================================
Message 3088 DATE/TIME: 11/10/93 11:11
From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED --
To : NORMAN WOOTAN
Subject: MHD and Resonance
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Hi again, Norm.
I just finished reading your message at greater length, and
hopefully, with more understanding. So, I want to ask your opinion.
Page 2
I've been solidly of the opinion (also from experiments of my own)
that ANY form of unity plus would require resonance. The CLEMM
engine, which uses cooking oil with a turbine, is a good example.
He pumped the oil until the turbine speed was at aggregate
resonance, and the oil continued to flow by itself, propelled by the
heat generated during the pumping process. One of these engines is
still running around Dallas somewhere, buried so as to keep people
from touching it.
A MHD design might also pump the plasma to resonance, and then
disconnect the pump/heater, and keep going in the same manner. I'd
GUESS that that is how the Mark V (or its followers) work. I
haven't the means to build a prototype of this, but it seems
reasonable.
What do you think? The book, as you noted, failed to mention the
energy required to maintain the pump/heater, but they may have
stumbled on the resonance principle, as Clemm did.
CUL
Joel
----------------------------------------
Msg # 3088 [1..3254] [R]eply, [F]orward, [K]ill, [P]rivate,
[M]ove, [E]dit, [Q]uit, [ENTER] for Next Message ? 3113
====================================================================
Message 3113 DATE/TIME: 11/11/93 07:22
From : NORMAN WOOTAN
To : ALL
Subject: Plasma MHD #2
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
After a little prompting from Bert last night I will talk about the
cold MHD experiment that I did several years ago.
First a little background, I spent 30 years in the military during
which time I had the opportunity to visit many of the defense
manufacturing and R&D facilities since I was working with the R&D
programs. While we were working on the ABM Sprint missile system
back in the seventies I visited the Arnold wind tunnel, NASA Moffett
Field and the BRL Hypersonic facility, therefore have first hand
knowledge of them.
During my stint as Director of Research and Development for a large
energy firm in the Smoky Mountains (Ashville) we researched a low
temp MHD system that would work on a wood burning or gas fired
furnace for domestic application. It was based on an Israeli patent
for a solar fired freon media system that opperated at 180 F.
Since high temps are really NOT necessary for the MHD process to
work then it follows that maybe a cold process was possible.
Several years ago I assembled all the parts and put together a table
top MHD generator that was rather interesting.
The combination occurred to me after reading Joseph Caters "Awsome
Life Force" in which he differentiated the HARD electrons from SOFT
electrons noting their different characteristics.
D.C. Cox of Resonance Research filled me in on the difference
Page 2
between the soft electrons that are generated by influence machines
like Holts, Wimshurst and other electrostatic generators and the
Vandegraff machine which generates or accumulates hard electrons,
since it is an ion seeded device VS stripping electrons out of a
dielectric media (wimshurst).
The Swiss ML converter works on the principle that I will Now
describe.
I built a typical MHD generator channel which is like a venturi with
a square cross section of one square inch on opposing sides of the
square. We place a North and South pole with approximately 50,000
gauss magnetic flux density.
At the adjacent sides of the square we have the current pick-up
plates, at low temp I used copper. High temp applications use
tungsten and ceramic construction. I built a small wind tunnel that
employed a turbo fan that moved the air around the closed circuit at
a tremendous velocity.
On the back side of the wind tunnel loop I placed an electrostatic
grid sort of like a bug eater on which I put an electostatic charge
(soft electrons) to be picked up by my seed material which was
SODIUM POTASSIUM TARTRATE better known to non-chemists as ROCHELLE
SALT.
By the way, ROCHELLE SALT is the most electrically active material
known in scientific circles. It can and does have the capability to
carry tremendous electrostatic charges. When the electrostatically
charged crystals are moved by the air currents through a very strong
magnetic field the electrons are stripped out of the flow at 90
degrees to the magnetic poles an are deposited as a + or positive
charge on one side of the square and a - negative charge on the
opposite side of the square.
With the turbo fan screaming at 12,000 RPM, dogs barking, the
neighbors watched as the meters jumped off the scale with DC output
at the pick-up terminals. I made a long run of the device observing
the relationship between the electostatic input VS the dc output
when all of a sudden my fan made some god-awful noises caused by the
fact that the tartrate crystal have a melting point of 170 F and I
had exceeded this temp which literally caused a meltdown within the
fan.
I dissassembled the device and tossed the fan into the dumpster for
it was totally destroyed with melted tartrate crystal (an
intercooler would have helped here). My neighbors asked what I had
learned, to which I replied "A lot".
D.C. Cox told me that Ion seeded devices such as Vandegraff machines
accumulate hard electrons, therefore are very dangerous. The output
of these machines can kill you INSTANTLY, therefore he will not even
sell plans for them.
On the other hand, electrostatic generators work by accumulating
soft electrons, therefore are harmless in the raw form. Be careful
for we now have an idea as to how to transform soft electrons into
hard electrons in the form of DC current which is what is taking
place in the Swiss ML converter.
Page 4
Basic MHD principles are the key to this energy conversion. Due to
on line time constraints( JERRY, ARE YOU READING ?) I have to end
this session and pick up at a later date with the discussion of the
CLEM N-MACHINE combo since JOEL brought it up. See Jerry has a
program called MESS-UP which he is going to install that will allow
us to word process messages at our leisure, them load them up to the
board at 9600 baud which will give us all more time to exchange a
great deal of knowledge. Thanks again to Joel, Bert and Jerry for
their friendly support. Your friend NORM.
----------------------------------------
There has been a Reply to this message, use [+] to Read the most
recent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Note
The following is a very short piece regarding an amazing energy
device called the MigMa. It is being included because of its
claimed overunity output.
A Bulgarian-born American physicist named Joseph Maglich has
invented and partially developed an atomic FUSION reactor which
he calls "MigMa", which uses NON-radioactive deuterium as a fuel
(available in nearly UNlimited quantities from sea water), does
NOT produce radioactive waste, can be converted DIRECTLY into
electricity (without energy-wasting steam turbines), and can be
constructed small enough to power a house or large enough to
power a city or spaceship.
And UNlike the "Tokamaks" and laser fusion monstrosities that we
read about, MigMa WORKS, already producing at least THREE WATTS
of power for every WATT PUT IN!
(New Times - 6/26/78, pages 32-40). If anyone can locate this
article, we at KeelyNet would greatly appreciate a photocopy so
that it can be placed online for researchers. Please send to the
above address and send photocopy costs if applicable...thank you!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 5
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/comefrom.asc
+224
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
_____________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : COMEFROM.ASC | Online Date : 09/19/94 |
| Contributed by : Steve Gantt | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
THE MYSTERY OF "FREE ENERGY": WHERE DOES IT COME FROM?
By Rolf Schaffranke
(taken from The Manual of Free Energy Devices and Systems Vol. II)
Since major breakthroughs in the physics of non-conventional energy generation
and energy conversion have already been made in several countries, it seems
appropriate to present the main points of the ongoing changes in research in a
convenient Question and Answer format which allows a selective overview of the
highlights of newly established facts and observations.
Please remember that big name, long established companies have long abdicated
the main part of their research initiative to government planners and we no
longer can look to them for leadership.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question: "Where does the energy potential for the operation of the new
'converters' actually come from?"
Answer: The energy is extracted from the G-Field, formerly known also as the
Ether-Field, identifiable today as a real acceptable, sub nuclear
and sub-quantic medium" In the past, this medium was given various
names, such as PRANA, by the Indians; ORGONE, by Dr., Wilhelm Reich;
ODIC FORCE, by Baron Von Reichenbach; ANIMAL MAGNETISM, by Franz A
Messmer , MUMIA, by ParaceIsus ; BIO-COSMIC ENERGY, by Dr. Brunler;
ELOPTIC ENERGY, by Dr. Hieronymus; X-FORCE, by Dr. Eeeman (UK )
Today, it is commonly referred to by one of the following definition
NEUTRINO SEA, by Prof. P.A.M. Dirac; RADIANT ENERGY, by Dr. T.H.
Moray, FERMI SEA; PRIMARY ENERGY; TACHYON FIELD, Prof. G. Feinberg;
ZERO POINT ENERGY; GRAVITY FIELD ENERGY. or G-FIELD; SPACE ENERGY,
all merely euphemisms..... what Aristotle once chose to call
"ETHER".
Question: "What is the magnitude of this field energy potential?."
Answer: The energy content of the G-Field was calculated as
(1) l0 ~33 cm3 by Sir Oliver Lodge, England,
(2) 8.8x10~8 volts/cm by Prof. S. Seike Japan,
(3) 250 billion Joule/ml by Rene L. Vallee, France.
To repeat a popular conversion figure published in Switzerland, the
energy content of One Liter of SPACE is about equal to the energy of
5000 Liters of gasoline.
A remarkable confirmation of the claims of Nicola TESLA who, more than
100 years ago, expressed his belief that "before many generations will
have passed," mankind will be able to extract unlimited power at any
place,"
Question: "Which scientists of repute (Nobel Prize winners) are, or were in
favor of the 'ETHER' (G-FIELD)?"
Answer: Some of the world renown scientists who affirmed their belief in the
existence of a universal ETHER Or Force field are;
JAMES CLERK-MAXWELL: "'A material substance of a more subtle kind
than visible bodies, supposed to exist in those
parts of space which are apparently empty,"
Prof., Paul DIRAC, N.L, 195 1, deBROGLIE, N.L. 1959. MICHELSON: "
"Even if relativity is hereto stay we don't have
to reject the 'ETHER' ".
Sir OLIVER LODGE: "The Ether is a physical thing, we can only get it
electrically"
STARK, N,L,;
ARRHENIUS, N,L,;
A, H. COMPTON, N, L., P,E:
A. LENARD, N.L.;
H. UUKAWA, N.L.;
F. SODDY, N,L..
Albert EINSTElN: ""There are weighty arguments to be adduced in favor
of the ether hypothesis. To deny the ether is
ultimately to assume that empty space has no
physical qualities whatever, The fundamental facts
of mechanics do not harmonize with this view...
According to the General Theory of Relativity,
space is endowed with physical qualities ; in this
sense, therefore, there exists an ether.
According to the General Theory of Relativity
space without ether is unthinkable. ."
The above quote by Dr. Albert Einstein was published in 1920, based on
Einstein's speech at the University of Leiden, Holland, (May 5, 1920).
The publication was in German, and translated by Sir Oliver Lodge into
English, quoted from his book, "Ether and Relativity" (1925). However
practically all textbooks in physics omit this fact, Einstein himself has
gone on record stating on his 70th birthday .
"Now you think that I am looking back at my life's work with calm
satisfaction. But, on closer look, it is quite different. There is not a
single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm and I am
not sure if I was on the right track after all:"
Question: "What about conservation of energy law pertaining to the operation
of cosmic energy converters and motors? "
Answer: ".. every emission or absorption of virtual particles already accepted
to totally violate conservation of energy. That is, emission
represents the sudden appearance of extra energy in the ordinary
universe, and absorption represents the sudden disappearance of some
energy from the ordinary universe Every charged particle in the
universe constantly does both processes, Even the neutron is
continually breaking into different virtual, charged particles, So
every piece of mass in the universe, ACCORDING TO ORDINARY Y PARTICLE
PHYSICS-is already violating conservation of energy on the micro
level...
...a strong magnetic pole represents an additional stress in space-
time, (the G.Field, R,S.) as does a strong static electric charge.
Either of these situations warps and twists space-time itself, This
in the region of a magnetic pole or of a strong static charge,
conservation of energy need not apply, Specifically, for large,
massive atoms of some heavy elements violation of ordinary ""linear"
magnetism-and hence of the linear conservation of energy law-has
already been noted.
This is particularly interesting since, with a permanent magnet, one can apply
spatiotemporal (G-Field) stress in a locality without any further input of
energy. The entire business of using this produce a free energy device depends
simply on the cleverness of the inventor.
It is also possible to time the applications of both effects-static electric
stress and magnetic monopolar stress with an ordinary electromagnetic rotary
device to produce seemingly ""Free" energy. And so the potential is there for
free energy. To the question, "Can it in principle be done?', we must
definitely answer, ""Yes, if we believe our present physics "
The second question, ""How difficult is it to do?", can be answered in several
ways; possibly the best is: ""if one is clever and gets back to absolute,
simple fundamentals, it may be possible to do it cheaply and in a
straightforward, practical manner,"
Tom Bearden, "WHY FREE ENERGY IS POSSIBLE" in PEGASUS, VOL. @, Ed, 1, January
1984, ASGFE.
Question: "Operation of such a G-Field or Tachyon Field energy converter would
be in violation of the scientific fact that a perpetual mobile is
clearly impossible, Any comments?"'
Answer: This applied only to so-called " 'closed systems" in our technology,
like turbines, combustion engines, steam engines, etc.
Nature shows that the movement of electrons around the atomic nuclear, planets
around the suns, etc., are indeed all genuine "'Perpetual mobiles" since they
represent " open systems," interacting with various fields of electrical,
gravitational etc., nature
Examples of Perpetual Mobile Actions are, among others:
A) the Bessler Wheel (1712 to 1717),
B) The Foucalt Pendulum (France) both are powered by the rotation of the
earth, " The earlier, original concept of perpetual motion refers
merely to any device that does work in excess of its energy input.
This does not exclude an unseen energy source (such as the G-Field!)
as the input to a perpetual motion device. lt is this that separates
practical perpetual motion from the laws of thermodynamics!"
Quoted from: Earth Rotation as a Source of Free Energy" by Martin Ruderfer,
published in PROCEEDINGS of the First International Symposium of Non
Conventional Energy Technology, October 2324, 1981, University of Toronto,
Canada.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question: "Why are permanent magnets so important in connection with design of
G-field converters?"
Answer: Permanent magnets act as 'cosmic energy pumps' or 'gravitational
diodes.' The space energy or GField can be concentrated, focused
magnified and compacted by strong magnetic fields. The development of
very strong magnets, so-called 'Super Magnets' (NIB's) made from
exotic alloys makes GField converters and generators possible.
QUOTE: "I think it is possible to utilize magnetism as an energy source But we
science idiots cannot do this; this has to come from the outside. "
(Werner Heisenbert Nobel Laureates as quoted in the book: "Energie im
Uberfluss" by Hilscher 1981.
Question.. "What are the prerequisites for successful R & D efforts leading
to mass production and licensing of G-Field converters? "
Answer: 1) Identification and refinement of the best developed, most
economical, most promising conceptual approach.
2) Close international contacts to assure a flow of up to date
information about all new developments in this technology area in
order to avoid dead-end approaches.
3) Follow the newly developed super magnet technology in all countries
with special emphasis on samariumcobalt and neodynium compounds
(neodyniumironboron) and other new materials.
4) application of vortex technology within the known laws of fluid
dynamics and nuclear dynamics.
5) Sufficient long-term funding for success by attracting venture
capital, by offering of tax write-offs plus an inflation proof
potential return. (As a tax write-off it can be more attractive to
an investor than giving to a favorite charity Note: Over 100% in
the U.S.A.)
6) In general logical thinking and ethical handling of the project in
question by all partners will assure success.
(Note: In reference to Item 5 above): Since the IRS Vs SNOW case of 1974, it
is held that a new limited partnership organized for the purpose of financing
the development of a new process or product is entitled to deduct research
experimentation and development costs.
It is of course extremely difficult to put a price tag on the results of R & D
in an area of revolutionary technology.
However there is no doubt whatsoever about the feasibility of the technology
as such.
Dr. R. Schaffranke, h. c.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quotations: R. Buckminster Fuller
1) "There isn't any energy crisis. It's simply a crisis of ignorance"
2) "It is amazing that in the sub micro world of the atom quantum
physics requires the perpetual motion of particles both as to spin
and orbital motions. In the macro world, science is based on the law
that a perpetual motion machine is absolutely impossible. "
John W Ecklin
This is the state of today's science?. .??
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/complex.asc
+689
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,689 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : COMPLEX.ASC | Online Date : 06/10/95 |
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| WWW Mirror - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
This file deals with the authors idea of the universe being composed or
progressively complex systems. It directly corresponds with enfolded (nested)
structures such as are developed in scalar fields and used practically in
radionics.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
220 15009 <3pqtkr$kmd@stud.Direct.CA> article
Path: ix.netcom.com!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!math.
ohio-state.edu!scipio.cyberstore.ca!news.Direct.CA!usenet
From: pweis@Direct.CA (Peter H. Weis)
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Subject: Progressive Complexity - The Equation of All Creation -
emlplexy.2 [1/1]
Date: 22 May 1995 20:53:47 GMT
Organization: Internet Direct Inc.
Lines: 670
Message-ID: <3pqtkr$kmd@stud.Direct.CA>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dyn-158.direct.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Application/octet-stream
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+
Progressive Complexity - The Equation of All Creation
by Peter H. Weis
This brief and simple synopsis deals with the nature of our universe and its
creative forces. In the course of this synopsis it becomes clear that our
universe is CONSTRUCTIVELY DYNAMIC - as the planet under our feet and a single
glance at the firmament shows - and hence, that our universe is governed by a
vast plan and supreme purpose. Since the same forces that have created and
govern the universe and Life alike have also created and govern the existence
of our kind and selves, our existence is automatically endowed with an equally
vast plan and supreme purpose.
When we look at our universe, we see two basic aspects. On the one hand, we
see chaos and decay, and on the other, we see vast and increasingly complex
structure and order - an order so immaculate that it can be described in the
pure logic of mathematics. That the nature and the workings of our universe
can be revealed with the absolute logic of mathematics is the measure of its
own immaculate logic and inviolable Order. For reasons which will forever
baffle me, our scientists have focused exclusively upon the chaos and decay,
and have dismissed the profound structure and immaculate order of our universe
as totally meaningless and "astronomically unlikely accidents' in a
fundamentally chaotic universe.
Consequently, at least in their eyes, our existence is also just as
accidental, and therefore, utterly meaningless and without any purpose
whatsoever. Even today the professional stature and reputation of any
scientist still rests upon this profoundly subjective and deliberate one-eyed
view of our universe. As this synopsis shows, our scientists could not have
been more wrong. Here, the Chaos and the Order of our universe are unified
into the two complementary aspects of an indivisible unity to yield - akin to
Male and Female - "The Equation of All Creation".
The understanding of the creative forces of our universe by its offspring is
part and parcel of the plan, evolution and supreme purpose of our universe -
and therefore, the star-spun destiny of our kind. And while this understanding
delivers immense cognitive along with real power into the hands of our kind
and selves, its advent in our time also marks the coming of age of our kind
and the evolutionary quantum leap from Homo sapiens, sapiens to Homo nobilis,
stellaris (see "The Emergence of Homo Nobilis, Stellaris" by this author).
However, this cognitive evolutionary quantum leap remains, as always, a matter
of individual choice (see Darwin's recognition of Sexual Selection, a pure
matter of individual choice, even at all instinctual levels). Fortunately, the
creative forces of our universe are almost ridiculously easy to understand;
the average 15 year-old is fully capable of understanding these fundamental
universal forces, at least in principle.
Lest this be construed as the worst kind of anthropocentric hubris by some,
the evolution of the universe and of Life alike are driven by exactly the same
fundamental universal forces, and therefore, the universe harbours billions
of other races on millions of other planets in billions of other galaxies. And
although they differ vastly in form and function according to local
conditions, they all face the same star-spun destiny.
Since the universe as it exists today evolved from the burst of pure energy of
its big bang birth, EVERYTHING that exists MUST be inherent, if only
ultimately, in the nature of energy. Consequently this synopsis begins with
the nature of energy, to see what it may contain. And although an analysis of
the nature of energy is not everyone's favourite thing, make an exception
this time and you will be richly rewarded. You will be rewarded with a basic
but comprehensive understanding of the universe, of the forces which have
created and govern the universe, the Earth, Life and its evolution, the
emergence of our kind, and thus, the existence of our selves.
Indeed, you will understand the forces of All Creation. And although we are
creatures of the Earth, you will also know that we are first and foremost the
direct product and offspring of the creative forces of our universe itself,
and that our existence is endowed with the same vast plan and supreme purpose
that governs our universe.
We begin with the nature of energy, as stated in the 1st law of
thermodynamics. Everything that follows is as simple and as general as the
first law - as it MUST be ("The almost frightening simplicity and wholeness of
the relationships which nature suddenly opens up before us." Werner
Heisenberg).
The 1st law of thermodynamics describes the nature of energy as follows:
Energy cannot be created nor destroyed; it can only be changed.
The change of energy into matter, and vice versa, is one example. The change
of heat into motion (steam engines and automobiles) is another. The change of
gravitational energy into electromagnetic energy (hydro stations) is yet
another.
As the first law clearly states, and as proven by these and myriad other
examples, CHANGE is inherent in the nature of energy. We now have the ultimate
origin of all CHANGE.
Since the 1st law also states that energy cannot be created nor destroyed -
also known as the law of "the conservation of energy" - the STABILITY of
energy in total and as such, is infinite. There is no way around this; the
first law is absolute in this regard (also see the invariance of individual
wavelengths, of quantization, the eternal motion of energy waves. Therefore
then, and as the 1st law clearly states, STABILITY is inherent in the nature
of energy. We have now come upon the ultimate origin of all STABILITY.
Due to their common origin in the fundamental unity of energy, CHANGE &
STABILITY are the polar complements - like positive and negative charge, or
north and south polarity - of a fundamental unity. Consequently CHANGE &
STABILITY are eternally and inextricably interlocked, co-exist simultaneously,
are relative to each other, are superposed one upon an other, and are, except
for quantum transitions, inversely proportional.
Here we have obtained the unification of CHANGE and STABILITY - and thus, the
fundamental Universal Dynamics of CHANGE & STABILITY. The unification and
interlocked interaction of CHANGE and STABILITY yields this infinitely
powerful little theorem:
"Infinite CHANGE Within STABLE Parameters"
We encounter essentially the same theorem in Chaos theory, which is most
commonly expressed as (Davies, Penrose, many others) -
"An Infinite Series of Points (CHANGE) Within a Finite (STABLE) Domain"
And when re-worded as
"Infinite Potential within Finite Parameters"
this little theorem also contains the essence and the foundation of the
concept of the wave function in quantum mechanics.
With the unification of CHANGE & STABILITY, we have also obtained the
unification of Chaos and Order - only the words differ - and solved the
baffling paradox of the simultaneous co-existence of these antipolar
phenomena.
Nevertheless, we retain the terms CHANGE & STABILITY since they refer us back,
explicitly and directly, to the first law of thermodynamics at every turn.
(Apparently, we have also obtained the unification of Infinity and Finity as
the polar complements of a fundamental unity - which boggles my mind no end).
Snowflakes are perhaps the most familiar examples of Infinite CHANGE within
STABLE Parameters. Each snowflake is individually unique, yet conforms
invariably to the form common to all snowflakes. And while there is not one
snowflake on the earth exactly like any other - nor in the entire universe -
nor ever was and never will be, each snowflake is invariably true to the form
common to all. The same holds true of stars, of galaxies, of planets, moons,
trees, cats and dogs, every leaf on every tree, every blade of grass, and even
individual bacteria behave, as Lewis Thomas observed, "as if they have names".
The same holds true for our selves, of course. Each one of us is individually
unique, yet we are all true to the typical human form common to all of us.
Here then, we have the origin and dynamics of individuality, the infinity of
CHANGE within STABLE parameters, the essence of a CHAOS that never repeats
itself, and as such, the origin and fundamental driving force of the infinite
diversity - within STABLE parameters - of all creation.
The dynamics of CHANGE & STABILITY are quantum in nature and constitute a vast
domain in their own right (and far too extensive to describe here), complete
with its own rich and intricate formalism and structure, along with a wealth
of profound and immensely powerful new insights.
Among a myriad other insight, some of the major consequences inherent in
CHANGE & STABILITY Dynamics are; the as yet missing half of the complete
equation of quantum theory (a purely causative quantum theory similar to
Bohm's theory); a quantum cosmos; a direct avenue to the unification of the
four forces; a vast new dimension to E=mc(2); the profoundly important
function of black holes; as well as the foundation for what may well be called
"The Equation Of All Creation".
The complementary bi-polar nature of CHANGE & STABILITY Dynamics also strongly
suggest similar higher level polarities among time, space, energy and matter.
Since these dynamics will occupy us until the end of time, and except for the
simple basics far exceed my capacity, we shall not go further into the
intricacies of CHANGE & STABILITY Dynamics here, other than to state:
The universal Dynamics of CHANGE & STABILITY generate and govern all physical,
chemical, biological, instinctual, social, psychological, economic,
technological, political and cognitive systems.
In regard to cognitive systems: our cognitive consciousness is generated and
governed by whether a neuron - or a complex of neurons - fires (CHANGE) or not
(STABILITY). Likewise, our cumulative body of learned knowledge is generated
and governed by new knowledge (CHANGE) and long established knowledge
(STABILITY). The extremes of these bi-polar generating and governing forces
are most familiar to us as heresy and dogma.
Similarly, the ability to learn is generated and governed by cognitive CHANGE,
whereas memory is generated and governed by cognitive STABILITY. Incidentally,
the 0 and 1 foundation of our computer language is also generated by the
CHANGE & STABILITY dynamics of whether a transistor - or array of transistors
- fires or not.
The interaction of the bi-polar dynamics of CHANGE & STABILITY generates
Progressive Complexity. Matter, for instance, is a far more complex thing than
the ultimate simplicity of pure energy (is there an even simpler ur-energy, or
proto-energy, than the bi-polar energy we know? The Dynamics of Progressive
Complexity appear to imply this). The transformation of energy into matter
constitutes a cardinal and canonical quantum leap of Progressive Complexity.
Similarly, the serial fusion of elementary hydrogen into progressively more
complex elements in stars is another clear instance of the Universal Dynamics
of Progressive Complexity at work. Indeed, and in this light, every star in
the universe is a blazing factory of Progressive Complexities (our own sun is
fusing simple hydrogen into more complex helium right now - the source of our
'sunshine' - which in turn drives the Progressive Complexity of the evolution
of Life on the Earth).
The creation of the far higher complexity of matter from the ultimate
simplicity of energy shortly after the big bang birth of our universe not only
provided the physical foundation of our universe, but constitutes indisputable
proof that Progressive Complexity is inherent in the nature of energy.
Consequently, Progressive Complexity is fundamental to the nature and
structure of our universe.
The full implication are myriad, immensely powerful, and stunning. One of the
most far-reaching implications is that, rather than 'chaotic', our universe is
constructively dynamic and embodies a plan and a purpose. Growth, for instance
- from the seminal simplicity of a single fertile ovum to the immense
complexity of a fully developed organism - is indisputably a constructively
dynamic process which is accompanied, at every stage, by a geometric increase
in Progressive Complexity.
Similarly, the 'growth' of a proto-star from the elementary simplicity of a
hydrogen cloud to the far higher complexity of a new-born star, complete with
its retinue of planets and moons (we consider planet formation universal
rather than a unique local accident), is also and clearly a constructively
dynamic process accompanied by a commensurate increase in Progressive
Complexity. Moreover, every increase in Complexity is accompanied by an
obligatory and commensurate increase in Order.
The creation and maintenance of the staggering physiological, metabolic,
neural and cognitive Complexity of a fully developed human being, for
instance, demands a degree of Order which can only be described as awesome.
Growth, hitherto purely an empirical phenomenon, here becomes, as we shall
see, the direct product of - as generated and governed by - the fundamental
dynamics of Progressive Complexity of our universe. The growth of a chicken
from an egg, or the growth of a tree from a seed, is often considered to be a
teleological process - a process which embodies a plan and a purpose. Since
nothing in this universe exists without cause, we consider the existence of
these teleological processes to be the direct expression of the fundamental
Constructively Dynamic forces, and therefore, teleological nature, of our
universe.
The evolution and existence of our kind and selves in such a universe - and as
the direct product of its fundamental dynamics of Progressive Complexity -
also endows our existence with a supreme plan and purpose and, therefore, with
profound meaning. The full implications - regarding the true nature of
our universe, as well as of our selves - are indeed stunning.
Lest this be construed as another example of extreme anthropocentricity by
some, the universal nature of these dynamics makes the existence of our kind
far from unique in this universe. The existence of similarly highly evolved
races numbering in the billions, is a given. After all, universal dynamics
apply throughout the universe. Still, and although these billions of highly
sentient races differ vastly in form, function and appearance in accord with
local conditions, we will share the nature of our consciousness with all of
them.
One of the first implications of a progressively more complex universe is that
its fundamental dynamics of Progressive Complexity also contain what may well
be called "The Equation of All Creation".
For a vivid illustration of how the Dynamics of CHANGE & STABILITY generate
Progressive Complexity, we now turn to the enchanting beauty and infinite
COMPLEXITY of the images of the Mandelbrot set. Like our universe, there is
only one Mandelbrot set, but it is infinite. (Since this format does not
support graphics, and if not familiar with 'Fractals' or the Mandelbrot set,
please refer to the many publications, such as "Chaos" by James Glick, which
feature the 'fractal' images of the Mandelbrot set, most of which are strongly
reminiscent of many complex living organisms).
The intricate and infinite Complexity of the Mandelbrot set is the product of
a very simple algorithm which, in its most basic form, is written like this:
Z(2) + C = Z1
(Z squared, plus C equals Z one). Here, Z stands for any complex number which
is squared, and C stands for any complex number which remains constant
throughout and is added to the product of Z squared. The result of this simple
calculation is termed Z one. In the next round, Z one is substituted for Z, is
then squared as before, the constant C is added again, to yield the product Z
two. Written down, the iterative procedure looks like this:
Z (2) + C = Z1
Z1 (2) + C = Z2
Z2 (2) + C = Z3
Z3 (2) + C = Z4
Z4 (2) + C = Z5
Since this format does not support sub and superscript this sublimely simple
iteration goes like this in words:
Z squared plus C equals Z one
Z one squared plus C equals Z two
Z two squared plus C equals Z three
Z three squared plus C equals Z four
Z four squared plus C equals Z five
and so forth and so forth, ad inifinitum.
When the result of each iteration - Z one; Z two; Z three - and so forth, and
so forth - is plotted as a point on a co-ordinate grid, the infinite
complexity and enchanting beauty of the Mandelbrot set's images emerges, point
by point, on the grid, or as commonly done today, on the computer screen. The
preceding image was made in this manner (although the actual Mandelbrot
algorithm is a bit more complex than this, its basic form is exactly as stated
here).
The key to the origin and dynamics of PROGRESSIVE COMPLEXITY is very simple.
As is clearly apparent in this simple algorithmic iteration, Z is a
continuously CHANGING factor, whereas the factor C remains constant, and hence
STABLE, throughout. In this manner the dynamics of CHANGE & STABILITY
generate and govern PROGRESSIVE COMPLEXITY.
The gestation and growth of biological organisms - from the seminal simplicity
of a single fertile cell to the immense Complexity of a fully developed adult
- is the most intimately familiar example of the creation of Progressive
Complexity by the dynamics of CHANGE & STABILITY.
Each stage in the gestation of an organism -
one cell divides into two;
two into four;
four divide into eight;
eight make 16;
16 make 32;
32 make 64;
and so forth;
and so forth - marks an instance of CHANGE, as well as a geometric increase in
Complexity. The element of STABILITY in the growth process arises out of the
fact that each daughter cell is a perfect copy and identical 'clone' of its
maternal cell. At least initially, each daughter cell is an invariant, or a
STABLE copy of its maternal cell.
At the level of biological gestation and Growth, we are dealing with an
immensely higher level of Progressive Complexity than the CHANGE of energy
into the higher Complexity of elementary particles, or than the progressive
fusion of hydrogen into the Progressive Complexity of the elements in stars.
And while the PROGRESSIVE COMPLEXITY of the evolution of Life has introduced
profound genetically driven CHANGE into the gestation and Growth of immensely
Complex organisms, the DNA of each cell - no matter whether any cell develops
into skin, eye, brain, blood or one of a myriad other cells - remains
identical to the maternal DNA of the original fertile ovum, and thus, embodies
the genetic and morphological STABILITY of the organism. Basic cell structure,
mitochondria (with their own genetic and morphological STABILITY factors),
Golgi aparati, ribosomes, endoplasmic reticula, lysosomes, nucleoli,
centrioles, microtubules etc., down to the various chemical, molecular and
atomic STABILITIES, are other examples of the manifold and intricate web of
biological STABILITY factors. Also see the 4 billion year-long morphological
STABILITY of bacteria - despite the massive CHANGES to an aerobic atmosphere
and the intervention of dozens of ice ages.
The universal Dynamics of Progressive Complexity from energy to our kind and
selves are best illustrated by this simple diagram:
Homo sapiens
Humankind
Homo afarensis
Primates
Animals
Protozoa
Bi-morphic Plants
Plants
Algae
Eukaryotes
Single-celled Organisms
Prokaryotes
Proteins
Chemical Compounds
Water
Uranium
Elements
Hydrogen
Neutrons
Atomic Particles
Neutrinos
Quarks
Sub-atomic Particles
Photons
E N E R G Y
STRATA of Progressive Complexity
Although this is a very simple and familiar diagram (see a very similar
diagram in the textbook "Biology", The Unity And Diversity Of Life; Third
Edition, Starr & Staggart, Wadsworth Publishing Co. 1984, page6) it contains
many profound insights. The first and most obvious is the fact that the
structure and evolution of the universe and life alike is a pure matter of
Progressive Complexity. And we now know how this works. Besides a radical and
fundamental revision of our traditional perceptions regarding the nature of
our universe, this insight demystifies the emergence of Life and makes is a
pure matter of Progressive Complexity - as well a universal phenomenon. As
Carl Sagan put it: "Life is as common in the universe as sand on a
beach." Another insight is that the Progressive Complexity of the evolution of
the universe and of Life is an unbroken continuum from energy to our kind and
selves. To whit, our personal substance is composed of the elements of the
universe, and we are animated - body and mind - by the energy of the universe.
This insight has several powerful consequences. First and foremost, we are
creatures of the universe - and far more so than we are creatures of the
Earth. Since this insight will radically and fundamentally revise our
perception of our selves from earthy creatures to bona fide cosmic beings, a
little more detail is in order here.
For most people the big bang birth of our universe is, if of any interest at
all, an extremely remote and purely esoteric concept which has no bearing
whatsoever on their reality. They could not be any more wrong. To whit; at the
atomic level our personal substance is composed of protons, electrons and
neutrinos (neutrons are also made up of protons and electrons, plus
neutrinos). And protons and electrons condensed out of the pure energy of the
big bang birth of our universe within split nano-seconds of the big bang. We
are, in fact, the living, walking, talking, loving, laughing and crying
embodiment of the big bang energy of our universe.
There is no way around this; Moreover, the alpha, beta and delta waves of our
brains are the driving force of every thought, word and deed as long as we
live. And this, our life energy, is the direct product of the big bang birth
of our universe. The other elements which make up our personal substance were
created in stars - now long dead and gone - and also from the big bang
hydrogen of the universe.
We are indeed - first, foremost and fundamentally - cosmic beings. So is your
wife, your husband, your children, your family, friends and neighbours, indeed
the whole teeming shebang of our kind, including what you may perceive as your
enemies. And lest we begin to jubilate overmuch over our new-found cosmic
identity, the same holds true of cabbages, among all other things. However,
there is an important difference; cabbages do not know anything about all
this.
The unbroken continuum from the primeval energy of our universe to our kind
and selves yields another profound insight - an insight which contains the
pivotal difference whether we destroy our planetary biosphere, or not.
As any child who has ever played with blocks full well knows, if it removes
one block from a tower of blocks, all the blocks above that block come
tumbling down. Going back to our diagram of the Progressive Complexity from
energy to our kind, and let's say it were possible to eliminate the section
comprising Atomic Particles - all the other levels above Atomic Particles
would disappear. This is simple, straightforward and inexorable logic.
Well, as it turns out, we are doing exactly the same thing. We are eliminating
the plant life of the continents at an alarming rate, and on all fronts. The
inescapable consequence will be that our planetary biosphere will collapse,
and will do so within our time. However, there is still an, albeit rapidly
shrinking, window of opportunity while the dynamics now well underway can
still be reversed. But we do not have much time left. For a more detailed
description of the manifold factors involved see "A Vibrant Biosphere", also
by this writer.
Returning once more to our diagram of Progressive Complexity, we also find
that there are major STRATA of COMPLEXITY within the hierarchy of Progressive
Complexity from energy to our kind. These STRATA of COMPLEXITY arise directly
from, and are closely akin to the STRATA of STABILITY inherent in the Dynamics
of CHANGE & STABILITY which we have skipped in the context of this format.
Significantly, and true to form, each STRATUM of PROGRESSIVE COMPLEXITY
contains its own SUB-STRATA of PROGRESSIVE COMPLEXITY. For instance, the
major STRATUM of the Elements encompasses the Progressive Complexity from
hydrogen (the simplest element) to uranium (the most complex of the natural
elements) - each with their own typical and intrinsic STRATUM of STABILITY.
Indeed, "The Periodic Table of the Elements" is a beautifully formal and
precisely quantified map of the Progressive Complexity of the elements, as
well as of their various, typical and intrinsic STRATA of STABILITY.
Similarly, the STRATUM of Plants encompasses the Progressive Complexity from
the most primitive single cells (algae) to the most complex members of the
Plant kingdom (sexually differentiated trees and shrubs, such as the Holly
tree and Skimmia).
So far then, we have uncovered an unbroken continuum and absolutely coherent
formal structure - both internally (the dynamics) and externally (the Cosmos)
- of the creative and governing forces of the Cosmos and of Life alike, as
they arise out of the fundamental nature of energy and its intrinsic dynamics
of CHANGE & STABILITY and PROGRESSIVE COMPLEXITY.
We have also come to understand that the PROGRESSIVE COMPLEXITY of physical
and biological Growth is a constructively dynamic process, and hence, that we
are a product of, and owe our existence to a Constructively Dynamic universe.
Due to the universal nature of these fundamental dynamics, we have also
obtained the fundamental creative and governing forces of our biosphere. Given
the understanding of these forces and dynamics, we are now able to address and
rectify the rapid deterioration of our planetary biosphere effectively and in
short order - we can now engage the immense power of these forces in our
favour - if we can muster the collective will to do so. Within the context of
these fundamental universal forces, it now turns out that our current and
escalating health crisis, our poison-drenched and unsustainable agriculture,
and the rapid deterioration of our planetary biosphere are all the direct
result of our ignorance and REDUCTION of the Progressive Complexity of our
existence, agriculture and biosphere. Given these fundamental creative forces
of our universe, these crises can be easily and quickly corrected; see "A
Stable and Vibrant Biosphere", also "An Abundant and Poison-free agriculture",
and "Supreme Health", all by this author.
Along the way, we have also obtained a completely new process for the
evolution of Life; a universal process which generates and governs the
evolution of the universe and Life alike and is articulated by the universal
dynamics of CHANGE & STABILITY and PROGRESSIVE COMPLEXITY. Other than common
descent - and this now includes the universal elements we are made of and the
universal energy which animates us body and mind - nothing is left of
Darwinian or Neo-Darwinian notions. (see "A Formal and Universal Process of
Evolution", by this author).
Since our universe is fundamentally bi-polar in nature (the ultimate origin of
gender, by the way) the constructive dynamics of our universe are balanced,
with exquisite precision, by the reductive dynamics of our universe - by the
dynamics of Progressive Simplicity, or Decay, and death. In this context,
the phenomenon of birth, and thus of Life, becomes the polar expression of the
fundamental complementary polarities of our universe, and the reigning
scientific dogma of entropy - the dissipation of energy - can now be
understood as just one half of the whole equation of the creative dynamics of
our universe.
Indeed, Paul Davies recognised the obvious when he stated: "So there exists
something like a law of increasing complexity." ("The Cosmic Blueprint", 1988,
page 21).
Indeed, Prigogine has mused that, "all that dissipated energy (the exclusive
focus in current science) must be good for something." As indeed it is. One
example, and close to home, is the immense amount of energy which is
dissipated by our sun in the process of fusing the elementary simplicity of
hydrogen into the higher Complexity of helium.
We know this dissipated energy as sunshine, and while by far most of it is
dissipated into space, the fraction which arrives here on the Earth is the
generating and driving force of all Life on Earth, of our planetary biosphere,
and of the PROGRESSIVE COMPLEXITY of the evolution of Life. Thus, our sun is
the driving engine of a double-whammy creation of PROGRESSIVE COMPLEXITIES -
the Progressive Complexity of the elements in the sun, and the Progressive
Complexity of Life on the Earth.
On an immensely larger scale, the dissipated energy and matter in galaxies is
condensed into new stars and planets in an eternal cycle of dissipation and
concentration; and on a higher order of magnitude, black holes complement
these bi-polar creative dynamics of our universe by concentrating the matter
and energy of galaxies - down to the last lonely photon - and then dissipating
it again in highly concentrated and extremely potent form. The dynamics of
black holes and their function - literally 'cosmic vacuum cleaners' and re-
cyclers - arise out of the Dynamics of CHANGE & STABILITY which we have
omitted here for brevity. In this light, the big bang birth of our universe
may well be the product of "The Mother of all Black Holes", to use a
paraphrase of a recently popular oxymoron.
We have now come to the point of laying to rest the most serious challenge to
all of the foregoing; the 2nd law of thermodynamics as it stands today.
Although the 2nd law has been re-worded many times (entropy always increases
is the favoured form today), its previous form and fundamental concept stated
that any activity (work) in this universe is accompanied by the dissipation of
some energy - hence, entropy always increases.
This is true. My cup of tea does grow colder the longer it sits undrunk
besides me, and just by living, never mind working, I dissipate a lot of
energy into the environment. There is no way around this, the second law is
absolute in this regard, and governs the universe as a whole. This means that,
if only eventually, the universe must run down to a uniform tepid state where
nothing can happen ever again, due to the lack of any energy differential.
This is called the 'heat-death' of the universe. Essentially then, the
marvellous and near-infinite Complexities of the universe - things like
galaxies and our selves, among a small infinity of other intricate
Complexities - are counter to the 2nd law and are, at best, temporary and
'astronomically unlikely accidents' in a chaotic universe. This is the
reigning dogma of today's science.
Since the 1st law has proven so infinitely fecund, we now return to the 1st
law of thermodynamics to see what it may contain in this regard. As we have
seen, it contains, and explicitly so, the complementary polarity of CHANGE &
STABILITY. And encouraged to the point of certainty by a myriad other
fundamental and well known complementary polarities of our universe, we now
accept the concept of complementary polarity as a fundamental principle of our
universe.
With the universal principle of Complementary Polarity firmly in hand, we now
approach the 2nd law to see what we may find. The second law states that, 'any
work is accompanied by the dissipation of some energy'. Extending the
principle of Complementarity Polarity to the 2nd law, the most obvious
conclusion is that there should also be something which concentrates energy.
And, indeed, there is. Gravity concentrates energy and matter into such things
as stars, planets and black holes. There is also another force which
concentrates energy and matter; opposite charge of the particles also
concentrates energy and matter. And although some energy is dissipated in
this process - as the emission of a photon when an electron is attracted to a
closer orbital to the nucleus - the net effect is a spacial concentration of
the combined energy and mass of the electron and proton. The same holds true
within the domains of the weak and strong forces. It now turns out that the
traditional 2nd law, while absolutely correct as far as it went, was just too
short; to short by half, in fact.
We can now attempt the first approximation of the complete, or new and
improved, version of the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
In the form of gravity, mass and opposite charge, energy seeks its
highest available state and attracts and concentrates energy and
matter.
In all other forms, energy seeks its lowest available state and
emits and dissipates energy and matter.
The attractive and emissive forces inherent in the bi-polar
nature of energy co-exist simultaneously, are relative to each
other, are inversely proportional and are simultaneously superposed
upon each other.
And while this wording will undoubtedly be changed and refined several times
over, the attractive and emissive forces inherent in the nature of energy are
as indisputable as stars, planets, moons, galaxies, black holes, atomic and
molecular structure, the earth under our feet and the fact that we do not
float away gracefully into the universe at large.
Stars in particular, are brilliantly beautiful examples of the attractive and
emissive polar complements of energy at work. (The emissive and attractive
forces of energy have been formalised by a 17th or 18th century mathematician,
but my reference has disappeared).
With this, we now obtain a universe which is eternally dynamic and capable of
creating infinite cycles of Progressive Complexities, including Life and
highly evolved cognitive consciousness, according to a supreme plan and
purpose articulated by fundamental forces which operate with exquisite
precision, selectivity and Order on all scales from the cosmic to the sub-
nuclear.
As the direct product of such a universe, our existence is endowed with an
equally supreme plan and purpose. This brief synopsis is only a minuscule
glimpse of the mind-boggling splendour of the nature of our universe, and the
true and natural context of our existence as the direct offspring of the
creative forces of such a universe.
We close with this conceptual diagram of how everything that we are, do and
know arises out of the complementary polarities of the creative forces of our
universe - with the caution that the polarities shown here are inseparable,
and far from the clear-cut separation as indicated here.
ENERGY
Change Stability
Chaos Order
Emissive Attractive
Aggressive Receptive
Innovation Memory
Growth Maturity
Juvenile Adult
Male Female
Insemination Reproduction
Exclusive Inclusive
Selfishness Altruism
Individualism Sociality
Right Wing Left Wing
Capitalism Socialism
Revolution Tradition
Progressive Orthodox
Heresy Dogma
(Copyright) Peter H. Weis, Vancouver, May 1995
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/consvort.asc
+462
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
July 5, 1993
CONSVORT.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of John Draper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
A NEW BEGINNING FOR THERMODYNAMICS
by
Josef Hasslberger
Rome, 8 May 1993
The reactions and questions received on my articles "Vortex - The
natural movement" and Understanding Water Power" show that there is
much interest in the subject of thermodynamics.
In fact, the "laws of thermodynamics" have long been the subject of
heated debate, especially between the promoters and the detractors
of another field, that of "perpetual motion".
Joachim Kirchhoff, who has done a thorough research on the
development and the history of thermodynamics (1) has shown that
these laws, and especially the basic assumption of conservation of
energy, can be traced back to an authoritative pronunciation of the
Royal Academy of Sciences in Paris, made in the year 1775, saying
henceforth, the Academy "will no longer accept or deal with
proposals concerning perpetual motion". Their reasoning was, that
perpetual motion is impossible to achieve and that the search for
it, is time consuming and very expensive. According to the members
of the academy, those bright minds dedicating their time and
resources to this search, could be utilized much better in other,
more reasonable endeavors.
So the fact that until that time, no one had succeeded in
constructing a workable device of "perpetual motion", was used as
the reason to forbid, de facto, any further research in that
direction. The "laws" thus established and enshrined as the laws of
thermodynamics, have entered the official screening process of all
new inventions. Patent offices all over the world have more or less
consistently refused since then, to grant recognition to anything
that was, in their opinion, infringing upon these laws.
Herbrand writes (2) that Professor Pollermann of the Julich Atomic
Research Institute in Germany, who is an "expert" pre-examiner of
patents in the energy sector, has given a negative opinion on 43% of
the patent applications referred to him! He reasons that "the
natural laws accepted by science must be followed" and says that
Page 1
many people (in his view irrationally) "wish to make use of the
eternal forces of gravitation and magnetism".
We can see from this how efficient our current patent system is in
suppressing any real renewal in the field of physics. I have
written about the subject of patents in an earlier article (3).
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY
There is such a thing as conservation of energy. However our
understanding of the concept is largely incomplete. By negating the
idea of an ether, which I called "space background" (4), we have
limited our conception of energy to that which is observable on the
purely physical plane. All electric and magnetic as well as
gravitational phenomena however, are not purely physical. They
require for their understanding, a conception of a higher-
dimensional space background, which is, to use the term of Moray, a
"sea of energy".
Conservation of energy in the current form of understanding is a
useless concept, as it negates the existence of this giant reservoir
of energy, and does not take into account the constant interchange
(through the phenomena of electricity, magnetism and gravitation),
of our world of physical existence with that reservoir. Generation
of electrical energy through magnetism for example, is not limited
to the mechanical motive power applied to a generator and the
movement of electrons through a wire, but involves a complex
exchange between space background and physical machinery.
In this context, it may be profitable to remember a statement that
Robert Myer (5) made in connection with the concept of conservation
of energy. He said: "Seeing gravity as the cause of the falling of
things, we talk about gravitation and thereby overlook, that an
essential characteristic of an 'force' (energy) is to unify within
itself, the attributes of indestructibility and mutability."
This statement should set us thinking. Meyer in fact asserts that
energy, in addition to being indestructible, is also able to change
form. This implies that we can not necessarily think in terms of
unidirectional mutability, a concept which thermodynamics has
however maintained since the inception of its famous "laws".
Now the specific form of energy which is the subject of
thermodynamics is heat.
WHAT IS HEAT?
As a first step in our approach to the understanding of
thermodynamics, we must try to understand what is this substance
that forms the basis of the theory. Heat has at first been imagined
to be a fluid and has been given the name "caloric". Soon caloric
theory, which was at the basis of our famous "laws", gave way to the
contemporary understanding, that heat is an excited state of matter,
transferred through direct contact or through the mediation of
electromagnetic waves of the infrared band. Absence of heat, or the
temperature of absolute zero, is defined as a complete absence of
molecular motion.
Page 2
We shall, for the time being, accept this concept and add some other
thoughts:
o Heat is a property of matter. Without matter, no
heat.
o The molecular motion that we call heat is a chaotic,
a random motion.
o An increase of heat is an increase of randomity in
matter. A decrease in heat denotes progressively
greater order of molecular alignment.
TWO KINDS OF MOTION
In this universe, we have two basic kind of motion:
centrifugal and centripetal,
Centrifugal motion is outward directed. It is an expanding, a
radiating, explosive motion. It has a tendency to increase the
randomity in matter and thereby cause heat.
This is the this kind of motion we are accustomed to. It has been
used in our technology since the discovery of fire, and especially
since the invention of the steam engine and the consequent
industrial revolution. Our continued and exclusive use of this
motion has given us useful but dangerous machinery, polluting
internal combustion engines, radio and microwave technology that has
definite negative effect on human, animal and plant life and last
but not least, the daughter of the atomic bomb, our atomic power
plant, which is little more than a steam turbine using a very
dangerous source of heat, radioactive uranium.
We do not have to look far to see the results of this technology: A
decrease in atmospheric oxygen from 30% to 21% since the start of
the industrial revolution, a crisis of raw materials and energy of
gigantic proportions just around the corner, and a situation where
it is almost impossible today to find some clean air to breathe or
some real fresh, healthy spring water to drink.
Centripetal motion on the other hand, is inward directed. It is a
contracting, a gravitative, an implosive kind of motion. It has a
tendency to align and de-randomize the particles of matter and
causes a decrease in temperature. Centripetal motion is associated
with the animating force we call life, which physics in its desire
to be "objective" or "scientific", has steadfastly refused to look
at. Here we have the key to resolving the riddle of thermodynamics.
We can see how nature, using both these type of motion in a balanced
way, can ever regenerate itself. It simply goes, over and over
again, through a who cycle of
chaos ---> build-up ---> decay ---> chaos,
using the centripetal or vortex motion in the build-up part of the
cycle and the radiative, heat generating motion in the decay part.
Page 3
ENTROPY
The idea of entropy, of the constant and irreversible winding down
of the universe, was introduced with the second law of
thermodynamics. This law is based on an observation of James Watt's
steam machine, which was the only technological utilization of
thermal energy available at the time.
Entropy is associated with radiation. It signifies an ever
increasing randomity of motion, an expenditure of the "innate energy
of a system". According to the current views of thermodynamics,
there is no antidote to entropy. Once expended, energy is said to
be lost forever in that giant heat sink, which we imagine the vast
reaches of the universe to be.
One of the great minds of this century, an outsider to established
science, has recognized the folly of this view and coined a term for
the antidote. He calls it syntropy.
In his book "Cosmography", R. Buckminster Fuller writes (6): "The
reader will discover that the inexorable course of the gradual
running down of the energy of the universe - that is, entropy - is
only part of the picture. Entropy has a complementary phase, which
we designated syntropy".
We can now assert that syntropy is real, and that it is closely
associated with the second kind motion discussed above, with the
centripetal, the vortex motion.
While radiation is an entropic phenomenon, gravitation is an
expression of syntropy.
GRAVITATION
We know much about radiation, but comparatively little is known
about its "negative" twin, gravitation. I am using the term
gravitation here in a much wider sense than is generally done in
physics. Gravitation in this context means an electromagnetic
phenomenon associated with a vortex in space background. It is a
twin of radiation, only with the vector inversed. Gravitation is a
pulling phenomenon, and the effect we are most familiar with, is
that gravitation keeps us firmly glued to this planet. But
gravitation is more than that. It can manifest itself in just as
wide a range of wavelengths as radiation.
Gravitation in this extended sense, explains for instance the
phenomenon found in most "free energy" devices, which often show a
marked cooling effect on their immediate environment. This is
simply radiation in reverse, caused by an independent source of
gravitation, a point of attraction, which causes energy to "inflow"
towards that point, rather than expanding outwards from it, as we
usually observe.
Anti-gravity thereby becomes accessible to engineering. If
gravitation is nothing but an inverse radiation, a pulling
phenomenon associated with a vortex, all we need to do in order to
obtain levitation or anti-gravity, is to establish an independent
source of gravitation and orient it in opposition to the gravitation
Page 4
of this planet. Applications in space propulsion would be
comparatively easy to engineer.
How do we establish an independent source of gravitation? We
establish, by whatever mean available, magnetic, mechanic or
otherwise, a strong vortex in the background field of space. There
are numerous examples of such occurrences in the tales that surround
the field of "free energy", that have not been understood so far and
therefore were incredulously dismissed as the fantasies of a bunch
of loonies.
Maybe we should look at these phenomena again and try to understand
them with the new conception we now have of gravity.
THE THERMODYNAMIC CYCLE
The thermodynamic cycle as currently understood is a one-way street.
It leads from a source of heat (fuel) via combustion to motion, but
the heat must be constantly renewed through more fuel, as it is
"lost" to the environment in the process. In an article based on
the research of Viktor Schauberger, regarding the function of vortex
motion, Schaffer (7) writes in 1972:
"If the second law (of thermodynamics) does not hold true in the
case of vortex motion, one could postulate the following cycle:
Heat ---> Vortex ---> Motion ---> Friction ---> Heat
Vortices therefore should be able to change heat energy into motive
energy. This would necessitate an acceleration of flow and a
cooling effect. Both of these can be observed in the case of
vortices." I will not attempt to provide a mathematical description
for the circular process, but in the terms used in this article, I
want to restate what has be proposed by Schaffer, to put forth a new
and radically different thermodynamic circular process:
|---------------
\/ |
Centrifugal motion |
(expansive, explosive) |
| |
\/ |
Radiation |
|
| |
\/ |
Heat Increase |
| |
\/ |
Centripetal motion |
(contractive, implosive) |
| |
\/ |
Gravitation |
| |
\/ |
Heat Decrease |
|
\/ |
|_______________|
Page 5
This is the natural thermodynamic cycle of this universe.
Using this cycle, that is, using both the centrifugal and the
centripetal part and thus establishing a stable pulsation, it will
be possible to engineer new clean forms of motion-producing and
energy-producing machinery, that do not depend on fuel such as
petrol, coal or gas for their motion. Does that sound like a
perpetuum mobile?
WHAT IS A PERPETUUM MOBILE?
I think we have to reconsider our strict negation of the possibility
of any perpetuum mobile, which ultimately is based on nothing other
than the ideas of the honorable members of the French Academy of
Sciences of 1775. In fact, any machine which is constructed
according to the principles of nature, using the cycle as described
here, will have characteristics of what used to be called a
perpetuum mobile.
This does not mean, that the law of conservation of energy is
violated.
We have found a way, in other words, to tap into the very wheelwork
of nature an utilize its energies more efficiently.
At this point, I would like to thank all those inventors who have
encountered these phenomena in their research and who, despite a
completely inadequate scientific basis, have persisted to make their
inventions reality. I would like to acknowledge that their
inventions are real. Despite any refusal of patent examiners, and
despite the usual incredulity they have encountered everywhere.
It should also be said that this article would not have been
possible without the immense work Viktor Schauberger has done in
observing and describing the mechanics inherent in the vortex motion
of water, and without those that have collected and published what
was left of Schauberger's writing to keep the flame of this
knowledge alive for future generations.
One last word about thermodynamics: It seems that thing went wrong
when we were trying to imagine a closed system. This is something
achievable only in theory. Because every system existing within
this universe in constant and continuous exchange with the rest of
the universe. And how this universe is made, what it consists of
and how it functions, we have not even remotely begun to understand.
Josef Hasslberger
REFERENCES:
1. Kirchhoff, Joachim "Perpetuum Mobile und Klima-
Katastrophe: in raum&zeit No. 45 and 46.
2. Herbrand, Ludwig "Erinnerungen eines
Entwicklungsingenieurs", page 10, own computer printing
by Ludwid Herbrand, D-5144 Wegberg.
3. Hasslberger, Josef "The inventor and society" in
raum&zeit (American) No.4, October 1989.
Page 6
4. Hasslberger, Josef "Vortex, the Natural Movement", in
EXPLORE!
5. Quoted from a letter of Neise, Theodore Ludwig, published
in raum&zeit No. 63, 1993, page 98.
6. Fuller, R. Buckminster "Cosmography", page 51.
Macmillian Publishing Co. 1992.
7. Schaffer, Bernhard "Die Wirbelfunktion als Energiequelle"
in Implosion No. 43.
[Viktor Schauberger's book "Living Water", which details his
observations and experiments with vortex motion, may be
obtained from Tri-State Press, PO Box 150, Long Creek
Highway, Long Creek, SC 29658. Telephone (803) 647-2020.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 7
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/cycltime.asc
+217
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : CYCLTIME.ASC | Online Date : 09/09/95 |
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following is a compilation of 3 files from the alt.sci.physics.new-
theories USENET. It all started with the suggestion that time might be
analog and the Niels Bohr Institute response by Viggo Simonsen followed about
one month later. They all deal with the possibility that time is a repeating
wave and possibly speeding up as it advances.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker)
Subject: Re: Digital universe
To: colin@colinmc.demon.co.uk
You wrote:
>
>
> Is it possible that the universe is digital? If it were analog
would we not spend forever at smaller and smaller increments of the
first second of the big bang e.g. going from one second -
milliseconds - microseconds - nanosecond - picoseconds.
>
> If you can understand what I am saying from that braintwister then
your views would be accepted.
>
>--
>col.
>
>colin@colinmc.demon.co.uk
*** To those who read this and feel the need to flame....resist.
*** It is posted in response to Colin's idea and I will not respond
*** to anyone who will not consider what is being hypothetically
*** stated. There are many points and experiments which have not been
*** included in this response. Thank you....>>> Jerry/Sysop/KeelyNet
Hi Colin!
There is a fellow named Terence McKenna who has evolved a theory that time
speeds up the closer we get to the year 2012. He has a computer program and a
book which helps to understand his theories. He bases it on the Mayan
calendar and some other items relating to sacred geometry as well as chaos
theories. Quite fascinating material overall despite the new age
connotations.
McKenna claims time is a wave that consists of 'structure-breaking' and
'symmetry-making' periods. 'Structure-breaking' is when patterns are unstable
and subject to collapse from certain stimuli.
'Symmetry-making' refers to periods where new patterns are formed and locked
into reality. We at KeelyNet have found this work to be coincidental with our
radionics researcher and friend, Peter Kelly.
Pete has come up with a theory he calls 'energy as information.' Matter is
formed according to a signature (many interrelated frequencies) which are held
in an electrical form. Magnetism is what holds the matter in a stable form.
So, to change the properties of matter, you must reduce the magnetic field,
alter the electrical signature to your will, then restore the magnetic field.
The sustained new pattern will transmute the matter.
The way this correlates with McKenna is that the Earth has a waning and waxing
magnetic field which is partially recharged by the magnetosphere of the Sun.
So, over time, the earth and all on it are subjected to this magnetic
weakening to allow 'structure-breaking' when the electrical signature is most
subject to change. This is the time when radical changes appear in our
society, wars are waged, territories change, new discoveries are made, etc....
As the earth's magnetic field increases in strength, the sustained patterns
will become locked in and remain in control ('symmetry-making') until the
electrical signature is again allowed to change from a reduction in magnetic
force. During this time, few new ideas surface and conditions akin to those
of the 'Dark Ages' are in control. It would therefore seem desirable to
produce the best possible conditions before the increase in magnetic field
strength.
This all ties in with your idea of time possibly being an analog wave.
McKenna says the same wave is repeated OVER and OVER as we draw ever closer to
this 'strange attractor' which is pulling us all toward the year 2012 (as per
the Mayans and McKenna's calculations).
As the time waves repeat themselves, they get smaller and smaller, hence your
idea that they would reproduce in ever smaller increments. McKenna says that
by studying the WAVE itself, we can determine WHEN these points will appear to
take advantage of them in everyday life when conditions are subject to
building or destroying. Intriguing concept, eh?
Thank you for the interesting thought....if you wish, we have 3 web sites,
best of which is http://www.eskimo.com/~billb Bill runs an excellent
alternative science web page and lists many of the KeelyNet files under weird
science. You can also call the original Dallas board at (214) 324-3501 when I
get the hard drive repaired. All access and downloads are free as we exist to
exchange information and promote alternative thinking and experiments.
>>> Jerry W. Decker/Sysop/KeelyNet - Dallas - BBS (214) 324-3501
Voice (214) 324-8741
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Viggo Simonsen <vgs>
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Subject: Cyclic Time Physics
Date: 7 Sep 1995 14:59:26 GMT
Organization: Rechenzentrum der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft in Garching
CYCLIC TIME PHYSICS
by Viggo Simonsen, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen
How would physics look like if Time was cyclic, i.e. if all spacetime events
were to repeat identically an infinite number of times?
In 1949 Kurt Godel came up with a solution to Einsteins field equation with a
metric that implied existance of closed timelike curves. His as well as
others' solutions have been rejected on the basis of physical absurdities,
such as the posibility of traveling back in the past and killing your mother
before she gave birth to you. This clearly violates causality, since the very
cause for one's birth is now removed.
My feeling however from discussions and the literature that I have come
across, is that the issue and implications of cyclic time have not been
properly understood. Cyclic time as envisaged by the ancient hindus and greeks
or even by a modern philosopher as Nietzshe meant closure of Time itself and
thus a recurrence of all events in history, not local timeloops that would
allow for individual timetravels. Furthermore the period of the timecycle was
thousands of years, so no human being could possibly meet his mother before he
was born.
Closed timelike paths (CTP) in General Relativity (GR) are generally
considered to be pathalogical because they imply logical absurdities of the
kind mentioned above.
Clearly such possibilities are unacceptable, and in fact the whole debate of
CTP and causality violation is more of a philosophical than of a physical
interest. The problem doesn't become less confusing by the fact that the very
nature of time is so poorly understood and is treated ambigouisly in the
literature. On the one hand, time in GR is still the real number "t",
appearing in all the dynamic equations, and this mathematical definition of
time serves excellently on a locally flat spacetime, where time can be
considered as linear and uniform.
GR is a local theory with no a priori constraints on the global topology, but
it is absolutely unclear how "t" should be interpreted with a global topology
that admits CTP. What does it mean that a traveller moving on a non-geodesic
path enters his own past? What does it mean to say that t has assumed its
original value? Mathematically it is clear, but physically it is a pretty
confusing situation. If I go back into the past once, I will be doomed to do
it for eternity, because by definition the past is closed, that is, no event
that has already taken place can be changed - the past is fixed once and for
all. And thus I will inevitably come back to the time when I made the
timetravel before and do it again and again, ad infinitum - simply because all
events up until and including my departure are fixed. But by the same token my
future will thus be closed, or rather my history becomes perfectly cyclic.
The ambiguity of time in physics comes about, because we use it as a kinematic
parameter as well as a label for "historical" events. If the kinematic time
along a worldline due to some odd topology happens to repeat we infer that the
travelling observer is actually coming back to a set of past events. And
because we somehow still attribute a free will and an open future to the
traveller, we allow him to alter the past. It is very tempting to apply GR on
Cosmology, but I am afraid it allows for completely nonsensical inferences. GR
is a local theory based on the pragmatic time t, that of a clock, so to say.
Of course we can always integrate the field equation with some odd metric,
but the meaning we attribute to time then, is completely ill-defined.
Despite all this, the concept of Cyclic Time in physics, as mentioned above,
is not at all meaningless or absurd, as long as it doesn't violate the
principle of a closed past. It is perfectly possible, at least from a logical
point of view, that all observers move continuously into their own past in the
course of time, in which case we could have a closed and finite history that
repeated infinitely. Such CTP's obviously have a minimum length, they will
have to exceed at least the lifespan of the observer. (How can a CTP possibly
exceed de lifespan of the observer? Think about it!) But apart from that there
are very few restrictions on them.
In principle such a CTP could coincide with the lifespan of the observer and
death could act as a wormhole to bring him back to his own birth N years
before. His eternity would then be an infinite number of identical lifes, and
he would never be able to know whether his life was a particular or an
eternal event, or rather he would always experience it as the only one.
This is just an extreme gedanken experiment, but it is mentioned as an example
of CTPs that do not conflict with causality, or they are at least free of
logical absurdities, though they do seem to challenge our notion of an open
future (notice, that here past and future refers to the same set of events).
Even the overall history of Cosmos could be cyclic, which is precisely what
was believed in archaic cultures prior to modern man.
It would be interesting to see how physics based on such a constraint on time
(periodic boundary conditions) would look like. Tacitly we take time to be
linear, and our cosmological models reflect this view (Big Bang theory) but we
really don't know if it's true. If on the other hand Time is cyclic, it is
bound to affect a whole lot of our contemporary theories, notably the 2. law
of Thermodynamics.
If there is anyone who has been thinking about these issues, I would greatly
appreciate sharing your ideas and/or objections.
Viggo Simonsen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vanguard Note...
Another file makes mention of a phenomenon which directly affects the concept
of accelerated time. It is called ALTSCI1.ASC on KeelyNet and states that
frequencies are compressed when in the presence of an excitation field.
If McKenna is correct, that time is a wave that repeats at ever smaller
wavelengths (higher frequencies), then does this mean the Earth is really
passing into some higher energy zone? As is postulated in the idea of the
Photon Belt which claims we MUST evolve or die because the Earth is moving
into an 'enriched' zone. The same principle applies to 'nuclear genesis'
where an enriched environment can literally grow new elements, see the superb
file MAGSTUFF.ASC on KeelyNet for details about this concept.
Jerry/Sysop/KeelyNet
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/deadcold.asc
+264
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
June 28, 1991
DEADCOLD.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
VANGARD NOTE...
This is an article that was in The Dallas Times Herald Sunday,
June 23, 1991. This article speaks for itself, by showing that
some of our scientists, who don't care to understand new
technology or research it, would rather just call it foo foo
and pack their bags and run.
It is a shame, that we of the U. S. can start new projects and
then give them up to other countries to continue with the
development. SOME DAY WE WILL LEARN!
Ron Barker
--------------------------------------------------------------------
COLD FUSION NO LONGER HOT TOPIC
UTAH SHUTTING DOWN RESEARCH FACILITY
By Steve Wiegand
from McClatahy News Service
SALT LAKE CITY - Some day this month, workers will take down the
impressive lettering on the signs outside the building.
The last microscope will be packed and the last guy out the door
will turn off the lights.
America will no longer have a National Cold Fusion Institute. And
Utah will have erased the last visible reminder of a 27 month
roller-coaster ride that took the state from the top of the
scientific world to the bottom and stunted the growth of an entire
area of research.
"It was more than a little embarrassing for all of us," said Allan
Witt, executive director of the Utah Foundation, a privately funded
think tank that studies social and economic issues. "It's one of
those things we'd like to put behind us."
They were singing a different tune in these parts on March 23, 1989,
when two scientists at the University of Utah announced they had
achieved nuclear fusion in the scientific equivalent of a teacup.
The researchers, chemistry department chairman Stanley Pons and
Page 1
chemistry professor Martin Fleischmann, claimed they filled a beaker
with hydrogen-rich "heavy" water, stuck in an electrode made of the
metal palladium and wrapped in platinum wire, shot some electric
current through it and produced nuclear fusion - the energy process
the sun uses - at room temperatures.
It was tantamount to finding a virtually inexhaustible and clean
energy source, and it set off a paroxysm of pie-in-the-sky rhetoric
and test-tube rattling from Tokyo to Texas.
Scientists in Japan, Switzerland, Texas, Brazil and the Soviet Union
rushed to replicate the research. Pons and Fleischmann appeared
before Congress to seek funding for further research. World
palladium prices soared.
The Utah Legislature agreed to spend $4.5 million to finance a cold
fusion institute in a sleek new research park near the university.
State attorneys spent another $500,000 scrambling to protect patent
rights.
"Fusion Buster" sweat shirts, coffee mugs and key rings went on sale
at the university book store. A Mexican restaurant put together a
rum-and-tequila drink, called it the Cold Fusion and despite Utah's
arcane liquor laws sold five dozen of them in two hours.
"If this thing is what they think it is," Gov. Norman Bangerter said
at the time, "It's better than the gold rush."
JOKES AND RIDICULE
Only it wasn't. Almost simultaneous with the rush of enthusiasm came
a wave of doubt from much of the world's scientific community, which
tried in vain to validate the experiment.
"It was never a science story," said Robert Park, director of the
American Physical Society. "It was voodoo."
As evidence mounted that there were problems with the two
scientists' research, the pair became more reclusive, refusing to
discuss their work or share specifics with other scientists. Pons
eventually declined to speak publicly, communicating through his
lawyer or via a fax machine.
And as the "gee-whiz" aspects of the issue wore off, they were
replaced by jokes and ridicule.
"Cold fusion in Utah?" observed comedian Mark Russell. "You can't
even get cold beer in Utah."
Utahans, stung by the criticisms, said the sniping was just so much
scientific sour grapes from "the Eastern establishment."
Within a few months, however, the bloom was off the cold fusion rose
nearly everywhere. Anticipated financial help from the federal
government and from private companies that expressed early
enthusiasm never materialized, and a spokesman for the institute
said there are no prospects of a last-minute bailout to keep the
place going when state funds run out June 30.
Page 2
"I don't think there would be any more grants from anywhere even if
they came up with a way to turn tap water into gold dust." said
university news director Larry Weist. "It's over."
Which explains why there were plenty of parking places at the
institute last week, and why the last entry in the visitor log was
dated March 23.
"No one comes up here unless they're from the university and looking
to get some equipment," said a staff member who declined to give his
name.
A review released last month of the institute's work by a panel of
independent scientists praised the institute's work ethic but
concluded it had failed to prove the existence of a cold fusion
process.
"We could have accomplished something with more support and more
time and less controversy," the staff member said, walking past the
lobby's pictorial display of a then-triumphant Pons and Fleischmann
and an announcement of the staff's farewell banquet featuring crab
legs and prime rib.
"It's a damned shame," he said as he loaded boxes into a car truck.
"Sometimes I think the whole thing may have done more harm then
good."
A CRIMP IN RESEARCH
He's not alone in that assessment. Scientists and energy industry
officials say that in the wake of the controversy, funding sources
for cold fusion research have dried up in this country, even though
work is continuing on a relatively large scale in Japan and the
Soviet Union.
"I think it's fair to say that the Utah experience has really put a
crimp in the image of cold fusion research." said David Worledge of
the Palo Alto, Calif. based Electric Power Research Institute, a
group financed by the nation's electric power industry. "Utah
generated a lot of skepticism, and that's difficult to overcome,
especially in tough economic times."
Worledge said EPRI will spend about $3 million to finance cold
fusion research this year. But the Department of Energy, according
to a spokesman, has no plans to spend anything in the area.
"Until there is a convincing argument made by someone that such
research is a valid endeavor," said department spokesman Jeff
Sherwood, "it's doubtful there will be much [financial] support from
here."
But researchers aren't alone in bearing scars from the cold fusion
fallout.
Dominated by the Mormon church's theology and saddled with a sagging
economy, cold fusion was viewed as a means of serving both church
and state.
"The church believes that it has a mission to save the world in
Page 3
practical as well as religious terms," said Thane Robson, an
economics professor at the University of Utah. "This [cold fusion]
held out the hope of an energy supply that would benefit the entire
world."
Robson and others said there was also the hope that out of the
research would come a "Fusion Valley" that would invigorate the
economy and put Utah on the map as something other than the West's
most out-of-step state.
"Utah for a long time has had an insecurity complex," said political
scientist J.D. Williams. "To be a world leader in something as
important as this would have gone a long way toward dealing with
that. It's too bad it didn't work out."
Submitted by: Ronald Barker
Vangard Sciences
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/denislee.asc
+264
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
May 15, 1992
DENISLEE.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Bob Aldrich,
SYSOP of Survivor BBS in Los Angeles.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SOME INFORMATION ON THE DENNIS LEE "PHASE CHANGE" MACHINE
April 12, 1992
Note: This is an interview between Jim Davis and Bob Aldrich,
Sysop of the Survivor Club BBS in Los Angeles; 1-213-663-1301
Jim saw the machine in question and this is his report on it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Q: When did you see this device?
A: Two years ago, in Ventura.
He had a 500 gallon tank of water, and the idea was to see
how much... He was running a compressor with a wattmeter on the
wall, and we could measure the amount of electricity it took to
raise the temperature seventy degrees in the tank of water, so we
could calculate the BTU's it took to raise the temperature of the
water, and we could calculate the watts out of the power lines, and
when we did the calculation; we had gotten out of the plates on the
roof an equivalent of eight times what we got out of the power
plug.
Q: How was the system set up?
A: There was a compressor; seven plates on the roof, (three
or four feet wide by seven feet long); this compressor pushed
refrigerant through the plates on the roof, and when it would come
down and the compressor compressed it, heat would come out, and it
was a very short run from there into the tank of water, a big
insulated thing, 500 gallons. It (pipes) went into the tank of
water and dumped the heat into it.
Q: How long did it take to heat this tank up?
A: Forty Minutes, not long, it was fast.
Each of us, about seven of us, got to go up the ladder and
check the temperature. It was about room temperature to start.
Page 1
Then afterwards there was another set of plates down below
going into a frame box with one inch of full thick insulation and
a half-inch of plywood. We shoved the plates in there and closed
the doors and turned the thing on and got the tempurature down to
minus ten. And we got hot water from inside that box, which was at
minus ten. Of course there was heat leaking in from outside in the
room, which was at 65 degrees. But we went out for a lecture and
came back in an hour or so and we had made forty gallons of hot
water.
And then he did something else, he took that minus ten
refrigerated space and heated up the room with it to show us this
thing was net-gaining and it wasn't just sucking air out of the
room. He took the heat from this refrigerator (insulated space) and
he hooked it up to this blower and heated the room up till it was
about 75 degrees. That heat was actually being generated from that
refrigerator. Of course heat was leaking into the refrigerator but
nevertheless this whole warehouse got warm. The refrigerator got
down to close to minus twenty. I think the freon was good for just
down to that point, its boiling point was minus twenty. I was
impressed, I think it was free energy, myself.
Q: Free meaning, "Well, there's the heat in the refrigerator,
let's use it out here.", right?
A: Yes, well, we transferred it, yes.
Q: How big was the refrigerator?
A: Oh, gee, about ten feet by twelve feet by eight feet. It
was big.
Q: A walk in.
A: Yes. He was demonstrating that you could make air
conditioning in your house. You have a little room, you make it
cold, maybe it's your refrigerator, you pump that through the rest
of your house, you've got air-conditioning. You want to make your
refrigerator cold, your swimming pool hot, you could do that. If
you wanted to have a sauna, you could pump heat from there to a
sauna.
It's neat. (just move the heat around) Then later, what he was
trying to do was to perfect a way to make electricity out of that
coefficient of performance of eight, if he could convert that to
electricity, he could make enough to run the whole system.
Q: You mean, the power would be coming from out-door heat?
A: Right.
Q: And you could run the system. So you would just need a more
efficient freon-driven generator.
A: Well, he claims there was a way of making it much more
efficient; using special lubricants; if he could make the
compressor the right way, he could make it so it runs at air
temperature. Right now it's restricted to keep the compressor from
melting down. Because if you were not to restrict the input of the
Page 2
freon into the plates, the compressor would get too hot; so the
compressor has a heat sensor on it, and when it gets too hot it
just shuts down those valves, to cool the system down. I think it
could take 207 degrees or something.
Q: Was there some talk of a ceramic compressor?
A: Yes. That was another company.
Q: When was the last time you saw Dennis?
A: That was the last time. Two years ago.
Q: What do you call it?
A: Phase Change. Dennis Lee's Phase Change. A heat pump.
Q: There must be something different about it; how is it
different from a regular heat pump?
A: It's a flat-plate heat pump, it takes you further.
Q: What do they normally use?
A: They're around a box, there's a fan in the center. They
tend to ice up, these (Lee's) don't because the plates are all
spread out. But really, that's all it is.
Q: So just more efficient?
A: Heat pumps are efficient too, but this is more efficient
because it's spread out, it gets more heat.
End of interview.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Interviewer's Note:
This is not, of course perpetual motion. Not any more, that
is, than the spinning of the earth or the burning of the sun is
perpetual motion. Or perhaps not any more than a gold-miner is
getting free gold by digging it out of the ground. Of course some
energy has to be expended to dig it out. Of course a woodcutter has
to work hard to get some firewood to heat his house. But somehow
in the scheme of things, the digging for gold or the cutting of
wood pays for itself. The goldminer cashes his gold at the bank or
wherever, buys some new clothes, buys food and whiskey, takes a
woman, later takes some rest, and, so energized, takes the money
left over to mine more gold! Free energy! It goes the same with a
woodcutter. Of course a heat pump would have to expend some energy
to pump the heat inside, especially when the temperature is colder
outside than in!
The point is that there is all this heat floating around in
the environment just going to waste! Why not use it, and
efficiently?
Why get it from a gas pipe when you can get it from the outside
Page 3
air? Why use electricity when the potential is there to take energy
from right outside the window? At least if you are going to use
electricity to heat your refrigerator, you could take that heat and
heat your water-heater! You get the idea!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Note...
We first came across the activities of Dennis Lee at a Global
Sciences Conference in Denver Colorado. At that time, Dennis had
just been released from prison for fraudulent dealings with his
heat pump device. Although we did not speak with him privately,
we did attend an impromptu presentation at which he mentioned his
past and made claims regarding his system. The device was
promoted ONLY as a means of heating water yet hints were made
that it had other uses. It was also claimed that there were
thousands of units in operation.
One of the men attending the presentation stood up and accused
Dennis of ripping him off for about $3000. He also said many
others had also been ripped off and warned the audience to not be
taken in. This developed into a heated argument between Dennis
and the man which we all thought might break out into a fight.
We later spoke with this man and he said Dennis had made claims
and took his money, but he never saw the device that he had
"bought". We now understand that Dennis is sponsoring an '800'
number offering videotapes of the device for $50. The idea is
that you send a check or money order that will not be redeemed as
long as you return the video. We have not pursued this offer.
In support of the concept, we understand that it does indeed work
quite well despite the shady dealings of its promoters. The heat
pump is extremely efficient in the above mentioned configuration
as told to us by another local resarcher who is working on a
thermodynamic turbine. This local researcher informs us that in
the state of Texas, co-generation techniques that provide power
to be sold back into the grid need ONLY be purchased if generated
by CERTAIN SPECIFIC TECHNIQUES.
Acceptable co-generation techniques include Solar, Geothermal,
Wind, Nuclear or standard armature-type electrical generators.
Our inventor friend tells us that heat pumps as co-generators are
specifically EXCLUDED from the list that power companies are
required to buy back. We found that quite interesting...this
particular inventor feels that he was targeted as his turbine
device could be used to generate electrical power and so the law
was made to prevent consumers from making money FROM the power
company.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/depalma.asc
+132
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
Placed in the public domain from the VANGARD SCIENCES archives on
September 8, 1989. Our mailing address is PO BOX 1031, Mesquite, TX
75150. Voice phone (Jerry 214-324-8741...Ron 214-484-3189
KeelyNet (214) 324-3501
Faraday experiment as related by Bruce de Palma
Premise : Spinning objects fall faster than non-spinning objects.
"It began with a gyroscope, well, actually it began in the basement of
the Royal Technical Institute of London where Michael Faraday, in
December of 1831, discovered two types of generators at the same time."
"One became the basis of all the electric generators in the world today.
The other was ignored because it couldn't be explained."
Faraday was experimenting with copper wires and magnets. He found if he
held a magnet in one hand and passed a wire through the magnet's
magnetic field, he could generate a small amount of electricity.
Then he tried rotating a cylindrical magnet with a wire attached to one
of its poles and found that electricity was generated that way, too.
Since no wire was passing through a field, there was no resistance,
which is why we must burn some kind of fuel to run today's generators.
As long as the magnet turned, the energy flowed.
"When I reevaluated Faraday's experiments, I theorized that rotating
objects must attract energy, free energy that's all around us.
Therefore, rotating objects should fall faster than non-rotating
objects.
We set up a measuring experiment that involved dropping both gyroscopes
and nonrotating objects, and the gyroscopes DID fall faster, by about
.05 percent."
"The way to understand it is this:
Everything in the universe is made of male and female energies.
Energy is being renewed, is flowing into mass, all the time.
Rotation separates male from female. The center remains still-no
action, no motion, no force. That is YIN. That is FEMALE.
The outer edge (of a rotating mass), turns-action, motion, force.
This is MALE, or YANG.
"Men and women are not opposites; we are at once both yin and yang.
Magnets polarize the male and female energies, thereby creating
electricity. This energy is everywhere. It's what makes the world go
round and makes the planet circle the sun. It's free. Forever."
The N Machine ("N" in science, means "as many as possible"), is about
the size of a toaster oven. It consisted of a shaft with a cylindrical,
eight inch magnet on one end and an ordinary electric motor on the
other. A wire touched the outside of the magnet so that when it
rotated, current could be drawn back to the motor to keep it rotating.
It was, indeed, self-running.
Page 1
This model produced 6.7 Horsepower but only took 1 Horsepower to run
itself, so 5.7 Horsepower were left over to power washers and dryers and
toasters.
"What it means," says Bruce, "is the end of the Puritan work ethic. Now
we can have all the energy we want without having to work for it.
Our minds can be liberated to develop fully, to free human potential at
no human expense and without polluting the earth.
Nikola Tesla, the patron saint of electricity, once said: 'Someday man
will hook his machines to the very wheelwork of the universe.' Now we
can."
"You know, with the right kind of support, I could have this thing ready
for the public in six months. But people are afraid of it, especially
the money people.
They know that it threatens the power structure of the world, that it
makes the idea of slaves and masters obsolete because
it means that every single person already owns all the power of the
universe. The machine is just the converter."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your comments, contributions and support are most appreciated!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/diycf.asc
+264
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
September 2, 1993
DIYCF.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This interesting file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Steve Muise.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Protocols for Conducting Light Water Excess Energy Experiments
January 28, 1992
Assembled by Eugene F. Mallove from published and unpublished
material.
By Jed Rothwell * Cold Fusion Research Advocates
* 2060 Peachtree Industrial Court #313
* Chamblee, GA 30341 * USA
* Phone: 404-451-9890
* Fax: 404-458-2404.
Notes from Jed Rothwell:
1. This document is intended to augment the Fusion Technology paper
by Mills & Kneizys. Fusion Technology is carried in many major
libraries, for example, the Boston Public Library, and the
M.I.T. science library.
2. Subscripts are shown with square brackets: H[2]O.
Purpose:
Many people have heard of the light water excess energy experiment
reported by Mills and Kneizys in Fusion Technology. (1) By January,
1992, this excess energy effect had been reproduced by at least a
half-dozen other groups.
Even though the experiment is simple and apparently highly
reproducible, many would-be experimenters might be deterred from
trying it because of the well-known history of difficulties with
the heavy water palladium-platinum approach of Fleischmann and
Pons.
Even though Mills et al do not think that their excess energy is
due to "cold fusion" -- they have an elaborate theory of shrinking
hydrogen atoms to explain the excess power -- their experiment
_was_ inspired by the Fleischmann-Pons announcement.
The purpose of this brief collection of experimental protocols is
Page 1
to encourage others to try the Mills experiment and perhaps go
beyond it in their investigations.
How to Begin
The first order of business is to read the experimental part of the
Mills-Kneizys paper in Fusion Technology to familiarize yourself
with the basic approach.
Don't try any fancy pulsed input power in the beginning. Stick with
continuous (DC) input power. Don't be concerned either about the
exotic theory of Mills and Kneizys. Their theory may be wrong or
right, but it's the validity of the experiment that's important at
the moment. Other theories -- including "conventional" cold fusion
mechanisms working with the trace amount of deuterium -- might be
invoked to explain the excess energy in this light water
experiment.
Conditions that should be employed:
1. The volume of solution could be from 100 ml to 1,000 ml in a
vacuum-jacketed glass dewar cell. Note: Some people have tried a
non-dewar cell -- a heavily insulated glass beaker with plastic
materials to give the same insulating dewar effect. The cell
should be closed at the top with a tapered rubber stopper.
2. The electrolyte should be: 0.6 M aqueous K[2]CO[3] of high
purity.
3. The electrolyte should be stirred continuously with a magnetic
stirring bar to ensure temperature uniformity.
4. The nickel cathode does not apparently have to have the exact
configuration of the "spiral wound" sheet described by Mills-
Kneizys in their paper. It could be just a flat sheet of nickel,
but the ratio of the _total surface area_ (i.e. both sides) of
the nickel cathode to the surface area of the platinum anode
should be no less than 20/1.
5. The anode is of platinum wire, 1 mm diameter. Mills and Kneizys
used a spiral-shaped piece 10 cm long.
6. Above all, avoid impurities and contamination of the cell
materials, whether in handling or in environmental conditions.
Particularly insure that no organic contaminants are in the cell
or on the electrodes. (Don't forget that remnant soap film could
be a problem!)
7. Dr. V.C. Noninski, who has replicated this light water work (2),
recommends:
"Before starting the experiment, mechanically scour the platinum
anode with steel wool, soak overnight in concentrated HNO[3],
and then rinse with distilled water. Remove the nickel cathode
from its container with rubber gloves, and cut and bend it in
such a way that no organic substances are transferred to the
nickel surface.
Preferably, dip the nickel cathode into the working solution
Page 2
under an electrolysis current, and _avoid leaving the nickel
cathode in the working solution in the absence of an
electrolysis current._"
8. Before attempting to run the cell to demonstrate excess energy,
reverse the cell polarity for about one-hour to anodize the
nickel cathode. However, Professor John Farrell of the Mills
group has said that 0.5 hour of this treatment is adequate. He
says this "electropolishes the Ni."
9. Use distilled H[2]O.
10. There have been claims and counter claims about whether the
experiment will work in "closed-cell" mode with a catalytic
recombiner. Begin your work without one to be on the safe side.
Professor Farrell and, independently, Dr. Noninski have
measured the oxygen and hydrogen evolution in the absence of a
recombiner and find these gases in the expected quantities,
i.e. unsuspected recombination is NOT causing the excess power
effect.
11. The current density on the cathode should be on the order of
_one milliamp per square centimeter_. This is very low compared
to the Pons-Fleischmann heavy water experiments.
12. To calibrate the cell, introduce a pure resistance heating of
known power by using a 100 ohm precision resistor encased in
teflon tubing.
Simple Analysis:
The basic goal of the experiment is to demonstrate that
significantly more heat emerges from the cell under electrolysis
than the joule heating of the cell. This is how the basic analysis
works:
The cell has a particular heating coefficient (HC), which can
be determined by employing (in the absence of electrolysis) _pure
resistance heating_ by an ordinary precision resistor with an
applied voltage. One might find, for example, that the HC of a
particular cell is say 25 C/watt. This means that for a watt of
input power, the temperature of the liquid contents of the cell
should rise 25 C above ambient. In this regard, keeping the ambient
temperature stable is important; this is a source of possible error
in the experiment.
The heat input to the cell that would ordinarily be expected
from electrolysis (the so-called "joule heating") is given by the
expression:
(V - 1.48)I
where V is the voltage applied to the cell, and I is the current
passing though. The "I x 1.48" quantity here is the power lost by
electrolytic production of oxygen and hydrogen. Because the cell is
open to the atmosphere, this "power" in the form of potentially
recoverable chemical energy simply escapes the cell.
If, for example, the current is 80 mA and the applied voltage
is 2.25 volts, the joule heat input to the cell would be 61.6 mW.
Page 3
[An example used by Professor Farrell]. If the HC were 25 C/watt,
the expected _temperature rise_ of the cell due to the 61.6 mW
input power would be 25 x 0.0616 = 1.54 C. If the temperature is
observed to rise any more than 1.54 C, an unknown excess power
source may exist in the cell. If, for example, the temperature were
observed to rise 3.08 C, rather than only 1.54C, this would
represent 100% more heat than 61.6 mW coming from the cell, that
is, 133.2 mW.
Excess powers on the order of 100 to 300%, calculated in this
manner, are said to be readily achievable. As Professor Farrell has
said, "We have never NOT gotten the effect." [With these general
conditions.]
Caveat:
This has been a tutorial for beginners by someone who has not
done the experiment himself, but who has talked to the people who
have. You should be able to go off on your own now and find bigger
and better ways to do this. You might begin by trying pulsed power
input, which supposedly increases the output. If you are a cold
fusion skeptic, you should really relish this experiment! It offers
an easily reproducible effect. If you can find a _trivial_
explanation for the excess power, think how famous you'll be! More
likely, you'll become a "Believer" -- or at least a very frustrated
skeptic -- so watch out!
1. Mills, Randell L. and Steven P. Kneizys, "Excess Heat Production
by the Electrolysis of an Aqueous Potassium Carbonate
Electrolyte and the Implications for Cold Fusion," Fusion
Technology, Vol.20, August 1991, pp.65-81.
2. Noninski, V.C., "Excess Heat During the Electrolysis of a Light
Water Solution of K[2]CO[3] With a Nickel Cathode," Fusion
Technology, accepted for publication in the March 1992 issue.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/dnoyes.asc
+462
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : HUDSON3.ASC | Online Date : 09/02/93 |
| Contributed by : Bill Donavan | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
An Encounter With Doyle Noyes
By Bill Donavan
The first time I had ever heard about Doyle Noyes was in March,
1991. It was when Andrew Michrowski of the Planetary Association
for Clean Energy visited Stelle, Illinois. There was a lunch
consisting of a vegetarian pizza which Ginger Tharp cooked up for
the occasion. It was a cozy little get-together with Andrew and his
wife Monique Michaud, myself, Tim Wilhelm, Ginger cooking and
managing the video equipment recording the meeting, and others
coming and going through the community center where we had our
lunch.
The conversation was fascinating to say the least. A line from
"Alice in Wonderland" immediately comes to mind, about "believing in
several impossible things before breakfast". An air-well concept
was discussed by which the community could obtain all their fresh
water practically out of thin air. Then the conversation turned to
"scalar aerials". This was a discovery by Doyle Noyes, who then
lived in Kansas City Missouri, of obtaining free energy from certain
antenna geometries as well as heating and cooling and corrosion
control. This fascinated me. It piqued my curiosity. I had to
know how this worked, since according to Andrew Michrowski and Tom
Bearden this phenomena had actually been documented as having
produced a measurable effect. Absolutely fascinating. How do I
contact this guy? Dr. Michrowski gave me his phone number in
Missouri. I found that Noyes had moved into a rather remote
location in the Ozarks for an unknown reason.
After talking to Mr. Noyes, I discovered that he was offering
distributorships in his company, Multistate Control Systems. At
this point in my naivete, I believed everything was on-the-level. I
then contacted a buddy of mine, Rick Bassett, about this "marvelous
opportunity". Basically what Noyes was asking for was $600.00 for a
weekend-long educational seminar detailing the operation of his
system including the "territory" of the state of Illinois for his
scalar heating and cooling system.
"Oh, by the way, send me a photograph of each of you". Noyes said.
"Is this for identification purposes, or something?" I said.
"Uh, yeah." "Well, if we're leaving in a few days it might not get
there in time. It seems to be just an additional complication to
me."
"It is absolutely essential." "I really don't think you're going to
find two guys passing themselves off as us, if that's what you're
worried about". "Just send'em, O.K.? I'll explain later".
This seemed strange, and it in time evolved into an even stranger
story. I reasoned that since there was money involved, if this were
indeed such a "golden opportunity" there might also conceivably be
those who would try to pass themselves off as the individuals who
paid in the considerable sum to get in on this thing. So it seemed
at the time. Anyway, it sounded good to both of us, and we set out
for The Ozarks. Mr. Noyes made it abundantly clear that he did not
want to meet at his house, and a meeting place was arranged at a
local motel (another curious point in retrospect). We arrived
somewhat late, and went directly to the motel room. There were two
other guys there, one from the Monroe Institute and another from
Ohio. They did not look happy.
There were multicolored loops of wire strewn all over the beds.
Some appeared to be wound up into loosely-arranged coils of various
lengths and sizes. There were two lengths of what appeared to be
one or two-ought electrical cable wrapped up in electrical tape,
evidently containing a coil of smaller-diameter wire wound on top of
it and wrapped in electrical tape. The room looked ordinary enough.
"Whose is that?" I asked, pointing at an old VOM sitting on the
bed. I suspected that one of the two in the room brought along his
own test equipment.
"Oh, that's his", came the reply. "Doyle's?" I said. "Yeah." "But
it's so..... old!" "Yup, that's his."
Red flags went off. A myriad of conflicting data went through my
mind. Either he just left an expendable piece of equipment behind,
or his company was not making that much money. It was at this point
I knew something was wrong.
"Have you learned anything yet?" I said. "No, not really." said
the man from the Monroe Institute. "How long have you been here?"
"A couple of days".
This did not bode well. We talked for a while on a few related
topics, and compared how each of us became acquainted with Doyle
Noyes' system. Then Doyle breezed in, introduced himself to Rick
and I, and looked at a large wall mirror at the end of the room. He
inched toward it with a look of concentration on his face.
"They're watching us". Doyle said. "Who's watching us?" I said.
"The people on the other side of the mirror."
"O.K....." Rick said. "They can see and hear everything we say. I
can see them too. Can you see them?"
Eyes widened as we looked at each other. Not a word was spoken. He
then walked over to the mirror and extended his right hand, touching
the surface of the mirror with fingers splayed as he closed his
eyes.
"Close, close, close." Doyle said. He then dropped his hand, looked
at the mirror, and repeated the ritual.
"Sometimes you have to do it more than once. It's closed now, they
can't see or hear us." Doyle announced with confidence.
"Oh... good" said the man from Ohio. "Excuse me, Doyle, but why did
you need our photographs?" I said. "To make sure. You see, I
dowse them to make sure you weren't Russian agents or space aliens".
"I see. Do you get many of those?" "You would be surprised."
"Uh-huh." I said as a vision of the money which was paid in my
mind's eye slowly evaporated into the ethers. "Let's go out to
eat." Doyle said.
The gang of four and the man himself hiked over in the direction of
a fast food restaurant across the street.
"No, not there, they're expecting us there." Doyle said. We then
sauntered over to a restaurant nearby to the motel. The waitress
seated us and passed around the menus. "Hi, Doyle. How are the
aliens?" She said. "Fine." Doyle said, looking up. He then
pulled out a photograph and a white pendulum and started swinging it
over the photo. "This is how you find out if they are O.K. You can
find out if they're aliens or not too."
The rest of the conversation basically consisted of the group asking
specific questions about the scalar heating and cooling system and
Doyle steering the conversation back toward aliens and Russian
agents. He also added to the menagerie of those organizations
threatening to steal his secrets of the universe. I never asked why
he was so willing to sell those same secrets if they were so
valuable, and so dangerous in the wrong hands. I think at this
point my weariness of the situation began to show, as I listened to
the conversation taking place with a chin resting on my palm. Doyle
looked at me.
"I can read minds too." Doyle said. "Fine. What am I thinking?" I
said. Doyle began vigorously swinging the pendulum. "That's not my
photograph." I said. He didn't say a word.
After lunch Doyle decided it would be a good time to show us the
campground that Rick and I would be staying at. Doyle rode with us
in the pickup truck.
"I see you have quite a bit of equipment." Doyle said. "Yeah, we
hope to do some testing of one of your units." Rick said.
"Well, by the time this weekend is over, you'll be able to see a
completed unit in operation, and you'll be able to take it back with
you. I'll also need your help with programming them with some kind
of control matrix." Doyle said. "I noticed that you didn't drive."
I said.
"Well, that was because of the attack." Doyle said. "What kind of
attack?" I said. "It was a scalar electromagnetic beam from the
Soviets. It made me lose consciousness and drive off the road. I
was in the hospital for a while. Anyway, my wife who was in the car
at the time won't let me drive anymore." "O.K."
"We need to get you guys all set up as soon as possible, since I
expect another two to come in very soon and I need to start another
seminar".
"Well, we're ready to do the assembly and testing as soon as
possible, since we kind of have a schedule to keep too." Rick said.
"I want to show you guys the lab that I plan on setting up." Doyle
said.
We drove around as he directed until we came to an abandoned
building on the top of a hill. It was in good condition, white in
color, and rather large in size. I had to admit it was a good
location, being in a peaceful wooded area nestled high in the
Ozarks. Despite Doyle's personal problems, I sincerely hoped he
could pull it off. If his unit indeed worked, it would be
encouraging to see a production and R&D facility operational.
Especially for something as exotic as scalar electromagnetics. We
finally arrived at the campsite.
"I got you guys the best site here. Nice and remote." Doyle said.
It certainly was an idyllic setting next to a lake about 200 feet
away. The weather was warm enough that a campfire would be more of
a decoration than a necessity.
"I want to show you an example of weather modification." Doyle
said. He then proceeded to draw what seemed a pictorial diagram of
one of his scalar systems. He then held his hand over the drawing
and made an obscure gesture while mumbling something.
"It should start cooling down in about 10 minutes." He said with a
grin. Rick and I looked at each other. "But there is no physical
device." I said. "You don't need one." Doyle said.
Now I know that in some cases scalar electromagnetics tends to blur
into psionics or psychotronics, but it doesn't blur THAT much. I
could see a perturbed look spread across Rick's face and could
safely assume what he was thinking, since I felt the same way.
"But you tested a device for Andrew..." I said. "This should be
just as effective. See, it's starting to cool down already!" I
really couldn't feel anything other than a slight shift in the wind
direction. "You should watch what you say around here, by the way."
Doyle said. I could just see it coming.
"There could be either Russian agents or the CIA monitoring your
conversations. Watch out for anybody parking a camper right next to
your site." Doyle said. "What about space aliens?" I said. "They
won't use campers." Doyle said.
We deposited Doyle back at the motel and went back to the campsite.
The tone of the night was somber. Rick built a fire and we "shot
the bull" about several subjects. "I think this thing is all in his
head." Rick said. "You mean it isn't a physical device? They
tested a device in Ottawa, I mean a physical device. There's test
data." I said. "Then maybe he's trying to sell us something else."
"He promised us a device to bring back." "Unless the 'device' is a
few magical incantations scribbled on a piece of paper."
"Better not be. It sounds like vaporware to me. You can't charge
hundreds of dollars for something like that and get away with it."
"Unless you're too embarrassed to admit to getting taken in by
something like that." "True. Very true."
I watched the fire dance through the air and wondered about the
whole situation. If this thing were a shell game, it would cast a
pall upon the credibility of PACE and those who gave favorable
reviews of this thing, let alone references to this guy.
I thought about the amount of money taken in by the "seminars". Six
hundred dollars per person. Two people per week. That's twelve
hundred dollars per week, sixty two thousand four hundred dollars
per year. Not bad. I also thought about the clandestine meetings
in motel rooms, and the insistence on not seeing where he lives.
Doyle mentioned that he moved from Kansas City because of the high
crime rate in the city, and I wondered if there might be another
motive. If you were going to run a successful scam operation, you
wouldn't want to be very visible. A visible target is an easy
target.
I walked to the rocky beach and looked at the clear diamond sky,
watching a thousand twinkling stars reflected in the wavelets of the
lake. There was a lodge across the lake which lent multicolored
shimmering reflections to the water. It was absolutely wonderful,
something I really preferred to an antiseptic motel room. I hadn't
taken the opportunity to go camping for years, and this was a
welcome diversion. I thought about Doyle's space aliens and looked
up at the starlit sky.
Nothing seemed out of the ordinary, not even a plane with its'
navigation strobes on. A boat crossed the lake in the distance, and
I thought how great it would be to live in an environment like this.
Once again, I hoped that it wasn't a scam, and that I would get a
chance to work on something that would be on the frontier of a
future science. If nothing else, there was hope.
The next day was more of the same. Nothing was done except a lot of
what I would consider evasive banter. Nothing was built. To soothe
the feelings of the four in the "seminar", Doyle took us out to
dinner, sensing the dissatisfaction rising among us. It was a
rather nice restaurant with an excellent view of the lake. The food
was good, and the conversation (as always) turned to the CIA, space
aliens, and Soviet scalar beams trained upon Doyle.
"Yeah, I blew them up. I back-fed enough power STRAIGHT THROUGH THE
EARTH to take out those Soviet scalar transmitters. And since then
they don't bother me. At least until they build another one. And
the aliens know that I can destroy their ships if I want to with my
technology. They haven't got a chance."
"About the system that you have, what kind of limitations does it
have?" I said. "Anywhere from absolute zero to the temperature of
the sun." Doyle said. "Then why can't you heat a building using
the scalar stuff alone?" This went back to a report I had read by
Andrew Michrowski, that basically stated that it only worked for
supplemental heating. That question went unanswered. It was
ignored. He went back to a diatribe on aliens and weather control.
After the dinner we went back to the motel, where Doyle told us
about the "mind interfaces" that we would need to work on the
project. These were the two-ought electrical cables wrapped up in
electrical tape that I had seen earlier. They were to be draped
across the shoulders and were allegedly self-powered.
I assumed from the description that these units were basically
psychotronic amplifiers designed to "boost the signal level" of the
user. I measured a slight increase in potential difference with a
fluke true RMS multimeter when a girl associated with Doyle held the
probes in each hand amounting to a few microvolts, not quite enough
to clear the background noise.
Rick asked Doyle about the schematics for the system, for if he
didn't have something completed for us, at least he could give us
instructions for doing it when we got back. We went to a friend of
his who had a pc-compatible machine, as evidently the "schematics"
were on this. I thought it was odd that Doyle didn't have a machine
of his own with this on it, if it indeed were as valuable as he
claimed it to be.
The gang of four went to his friend's place, the back of a pawn shop
in town, and we proceeded to wade through the files in his PC. The
usual discussion about space alien effluvia bandied about as the
"schematics" were searched for. When I saw a printout of what Doyle
considered to be schematics, I began to understand where he was
coming from. They weren't schematics. They looked more like
ladder-logic diagrams. They definitely were NOT schematics in any
sense of the word.
If Doyle had any formal education, it definitely was not as an
electronic tech. In fact, the man had a definite disdain for that
particular profession. I had the impression that he might have had
an intuitive "feel" for this invention without any formal education
associated with it. That is common for many inventors. The
explanation for this phenomenon is that they usually do not know
what cannot be done and proceed to do it anyway. And they usually
succeed at it. That says something there.
That reminds me of the tale of a religious ecstatic who crosses a
gorge without a bridge. "You can't do that," the physics student
says, "That's against the law of gravity!" The ecstatic then
replies: "I never studied law." And continues across. I think
that the same thing applies here, if indeed there is any credible
element to this situation at all.
After the "seminar", we gave one individual in the troop a ride to
the airport and compared notes. The consensus opinion was that he
may have had something, but if he did he refused to share it. In
this case the cost far outweighed the risks involved, and for those
with limited resources the setback represented by this was
considerable. The net tendency was for those to become generally
disgusted with the situation, to throw out the baby with the
bathwater, and to forget about it.
Scalar electromagnetic weather control, corrosion control, heating
and cooling. Is this for real? I really can't say, since I didn't
see anything demonstrated. Rick Bassett and I came to a remote
location in the Ozarks with a pickup truck bed literally loaded with
electronic test equipment, taking time out from our regular jobs to
investigate this. And we found nothing but wild theories, unfounded
conjecture, and just plain hot air.
The "schematic" which was brought back was well nigh useless. The
only thing we brought back were three four by six planks about ten
feet long with about fifty pounds of wire, which by request was sent
back to Doyle. Evidently he didn't have enough lumber or wire for
the next scam operation.
I really would like to believe that this system works. It would be
a major breakthrough. I am also aware of the scam operations that
John Worrell Keely pulled when he was short of capital to continue
his research, so I can understand the reasoning behind this
particular technique.
But in the present there is no excuse for this, and I cannot in good
conscience bury this and wish that it will go away all by itself. I
don't know how many others have been victimized by following this
illusion, however sweet it may be.
But it is time to call for accountability for those responsible for
this. For those who are seriously interested in alternative and
"free energy", this kind of behavior cannot be allowed to continue.
To do this would result in a total demolition of credibility in the
entire community of those conducting research into this field. That
is what is in danger.
I have tried to keep an objective view of this entire "adventure". I
have basically reported the events as they occurred, however
distasteful they may be. This basically has been written down as a
record for myself more than anything else. If at some point in the
future I encounter some extraordinary phenomena which deserves
praise, that's exactly what it will get. Until then, I impatiently
await that day.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vanguard Note..
An associated KeelyNet file is MAGICSQ which deals with magic
squares and how they can be "constructed" with coils and other
electrical components in such a fashion as to produce
replicating, kaleidoscope "mirrors" for the express purpose of
redirecting or focusing energy. Much like a parabolic mirror.
The Perrigo patent used a series of coils (10 X 10), wrapped
around nails and all connected together to form a matrix or
pattern which sequentially collected energy from what was termed
an "Aether collector". If energy continually flows into the
planet, then there is a "wind" which should be able to drive a
substance or compound of substances.
My personal opinion is that such a device would be best
constructed by using Chladni vibrating waveplates injected INTO a
substance. This would create a "tuneable" interference matrix
associated with the substance and thus act as a down-converter or
frequency divider for the flow of force. I too have seen one of
these Noyes Matrixes and it consisted of multiple colors of wire
wound on 3 arms that all converged in the center. The man
selling them wanted $1000 and claimed that you could "feel" a hot
or cold wind over them. I tried as did several of my friends and
none of us could feel a thing. The man also "dowsed" it and said
"woops, I had it turned off", he then fiddled with some wires and
said to try again.
Once more we tried and nothing could be felt. I asked if any
temperature measurements had been made and the man said that
regular temperature measuring instruments WOULD NOT WORK with
this technology! I also asked what was the basis for the device
operation and the man said it was secret but I could buy the unit
for $1000 and find it out. Colored wires and 2 X 4s that did
nothing for $1000, yeah, RIGHT!
But I do have a friend, Dr. Dan Haley who visited Doyle Noyes
while he was still in Missouri. Dan says Noyes was located in a
2 story building and when he visited it was very cold outside.
Dan reports that the temperature in the building was quite
comfortable and he did notice one very odd thing. As he was
walking down a stairway, he held onto a metal railing which WAS
WARM TO THE TOUCH! Now, metal is normally cool and that was
quite an interesting observation. I guess the question is "DOES
IT WORK FOR YOU?". That is not really a marketable approach nor
one that most people could duplicate, so I think I will devote my
energies to duplicatable, verifiable devices.
I agree 150% with Mr. Donavan's contention as to CLAIMS that are
not substantiated by physical proofs. My personal experience
(Jerry) has been that I have NEVER SEEN a WORKING free energy
device or anti-gravity device. Nor have I EVER claimed to have
built a device of this nature. There are many who DO make
claims, even to the point of wanting to "share" their knowledge,
however, experience has shown this is usually followed by a
request for money or non-disclosure and/or a secrecy vow.
Based on the limited histories we have regarding these
"alternative technologies" such primitive attitudes will NOT
result in the public use of the principles except within the
domain (and DOMINION) of secretive people.
It is a pity that some choose to withhold the majority of their
information and learning from history, it has been shown such
knowledge dies with the inventor or is otherwise repressed.
We must all remain on our guard and continue to OPENLY share
information. There is no doubt that some devices can be
considered "proprietary" if they are intended for commercial
profit OR are outright WEAPONS. That is the main reason for the
establishment of KeelyNet, to make freely available a wide range
of information that in itself holds keys to HOW we might approach
the construction of working machines.
We can only hope that everyone will grow into a "walks the talk"
mode.
Escape to a higher order!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/dpalma1.asc
+528
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,528 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
December 4, 1990
DPALMA1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file provided courtesy of Weirdbase at 314-741-2231
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXT FILE NOTES:
The following paper by Dr. Bruce DePalma was issued with no
copyright as a gift to the world. There are no USA patents on the
described technology. The source for this was "The DePalma Research
Papers" which was printed by
For The People,
P.O. 15999,
Tampa, FL 33684.
Most of the figures mentioned could not be reproduced in this text
file. The following information appeared at the bottom of each page
of the original document:
DePalma Energy Worldwide
1187 Coast Village Road #1-163
Santa Barbara, California 93108
(805) 969-6442
If anyone is interested in other DePalma papers, send email to:
Mark
The Outer Limits BBS (300-2400 baud)
(304) 327-7452
Monday-Friday
8:00am - 7:00pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 1
originated 29 April 1990
ON THE POSSIBILITY OF EXTRACTION OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY
DIRECTLY FROM SPACE
by: Bruce DePalma
Abstract: Based upon an effect first discovered by Michael Faraday
in 1831, the N machine/Space Power Generator (fig. 1) is
an electrical machine which has the possibility of
producing electrical energy with significantly less
mechanical power input than the presently employed
induction machines.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
In the fall of 1831 when Michael Faraday performed the initial
experiments which resulted in the discovery of the first dynamo, he
also described a phenomenon which has yet to be understood in terms
of conventional electrical theory.
In paragraphs 255, 256, and 257 of his diary (fig. 2, ref. 1), dated
December 26, 1831, is described the experiment of cementing a copper
disc on top of a cylinder magnet, paper intervening, and supporting
the magnet by means of a string so as to rotate axially, with the
wires of a galvanometer connected to the edge and axis of the copper
plate.
When this combination was caused to rotate an electrical potential
was found to be created. The polarity and the magnitude of the
potential was found to be the same as would occur if the copper
plate had moved and the magnet remained still.
Faraday spent his latter years pondering the relationship between
the situation of magnet and disc rotating together vis-a-vis the
situation of fixed magnet and disc rotating independently.
He explained the situation by positing the assumption that the
magnetic field of a magnet remained stationary in space whilst the
metal of the magnet revolved axially. Thus a relative motion would
exist between the moving metal of the magnet and the posited
stationary flux lines giving rise to the expected potential which
results from the motion of a wire through a magnetic field.
Through the years many attempts have been made to observe whether
magnetic field lines rotate with the motion of a magnet which is
rotated about an axis connecting its poles.
To date, no conclusive proof has been found that the lines of force
rotate with the magnet or not (ref. 2, 3). One experimenter Djuric
(ref. 4) goes so far as to say:
"That no experiment with the generalized homopolar generator
or its classical form can resolve the puzzle, which one of
the two logically possible hypotheses is correct, the moving
force line hypothesis or the nonmoving force line
hypothesis."
In 1978, after having studied the anomalous inertial and
Page 2
gravitational phenomena of the precessing gyroscope through numerous
experiments carried out in the prior seven years, it occurred to me
that anomalous electrical phenomena might occur if the gyroscope was
magnetized, the magnetic lines of force being parallel to the axis
of rotation.
Following in the footsteps of Faraday, I reasoned the metal of the
magnetized gyroscope moving through its own magnetic field, when
rotated would produce an electrical potential between the axle and
the outer edge of the rotating magnetized flywheel.
The voltage thus created would be described by the well known laws
of electrical induction relating to the relative motion of a
conducting wire and a magnetic field.
As is well known, Lenz's Law applies to the forces which are
generated between a current carrying wire moving in the vicinity of
a magnetic pole wherein the current through the wire is the
resultant of the electrical potential generated by the motion of
said wire being applied to an external load.
In the case of the rotating cylindrical magnetized conductor,
however, it is not clear how Lenz's Law could be applied. In static
measurements, current can be passed through a cylindrical magnet
between the outer circumference and the central axle passing through
its poles.
The torque developed will be the same as one would get by suspending
a copper disc over one of the magnetic poles and holding the magnet
fixed (ref. 5, 6). The question is:
since the rotating gyroscope possesses anomalous inertial
and gravitational properties,
would the back torque of the rotating magnetized gyroscope
be the same with a given amount of current passing through
it as would be if the rotation were blocked and a fixed
torque measurement made.
Despite the simplicity of the one piece rotating magnetized
conductor, N machine/SPG, compared to the two piece rotating
induction machine or Faraday disc, in the time since its discovery
in 1831, no one had performed a test to see if the same generator
principles were at work as one found in a conventional induction
machine.
In 1978 in Santa Barbara, California, a large electromagnetically
excited N machine/SPG was constructed, the "Sunburst" machine. This
machine was independently tested by Dr. Robert Kincheloe, Professor
Emeritus of Electrical Engineering at Stanford University (ref. 7).
The abstract of this report quotes:
"Known for over 150 years, the Faraday homopolar generator
has been claimed to provide a basis for so-called "free
energy" generation, in that under certain conditions the
extraction of electrical output energy is not reflected as
a corresponding mechanical load to the driving source.
Page 3
During 1985 I was invited to test such a machine. While it
did not perform as claimed, repeatable data showed anomalous
results that did not seem to conform to traditional theory.
In particular, under certain assumptions about internally
generated output voltage, the increase in input power when
power was extracted from the generator over that measured
due to frictional losses with the generator unexcited seemed
to be either about 13% or 20% of the maximum computed
generated power, depending on interpretation."
Figure (3) and (4) show the construction of the "Sunburst" machine.
Figure (5) is a graph of the input and output power vs. speed.
After a thoroughgoing critique and examination of his data Kincheloe
concludes:
"DePalma may have been right in that there is indeed a
situation here whereby energy is being obtained from a
previously unknown and unexplained source.
This is a conclusion that most scientists and engineers
would reject out of hand as being a violation of accepted
laws of physics, and if true has incredible implications."
The "Sunburst" machine was an experiment to determine if the
rotating magnet N machine/SPG operating as an electrical generator
would produce less back torque than a conventional induction machine
generating the same current.
A practical SPG would employ permanent or super-conducting magnets
eliminating the burden of excitation of an open flux path
electromagnet.
Replacement of sliding carbon-graphite or copper-graphite brushes
with liquid metal contacts reduces mechanical friction losses by
80%. Brush voltage drop is negligible in liquid metal sliding
contacts.
Both of these techniques are employed in the machines currently
produced (ref. 8, 9). Applied to the "Sunburst" design the
techniques of liquid metal current collectors and permanent magnets
for the field excitation could result in a machine with an
output/input power ratio of 5:1.
A parallel program of SPG R&D has been taking place in India since
1978. P. Tewari of the Indian Atomic Power Board had developed a
generalized theory of matter and energy which showed that energy
could be developed from the vacuum by positing a structure for the
electron.
Having received the experimental results of the "Sunburst" machine
he instituted an r&d program to develop practical versions of the
SPG for general use. Tewari has constructed N machine/SPG apparatus
which produces excess output power over that required to rotate the
generator when all losses have been subtracted from the output
generated power (ref. 10, 11, 12, 13).
The phenomenon of direct extraction of electrical energy from space
Page 4
has a simple explanation based on a re-interpretation of magnetism.
Heretofore it has been believed that the magnetic field comes from
the magnet. The phenomenon of the magnetic field can also be
explained by positing a primordial energy field, which, in the first
order is uniform and homogeneous.
The highly anisotropic condition of the material of the magnet, if
it be the p rmanent variety, or the condition created by the passage
of electric current through a solenoid, causes a distortion of the
isotropic field which we know as magnetism.
Passing a conducting wire through the spatial distortion adjacent to
the pole of a magnet elicits the electric potential across the ends
of the wire.
Field magnets in electric generators do not run down nor does more
electrical excitation need be applied no matter how much energy is
being drawn from the machine. This is because the generated
electrical energy is being drawn from the spatial distortion created
by the field magnets.
The drag and energy penalty of the conventional two piece induction
electrical generator arises from the incomplete understanding of
magnetism and the nature of the magnetic field.
If we accept the notion that all electricity generation arises from
distortions of a primordial energy field then we could look to
methods of creating the appropriate distortion and concomitant
energy generation without invoking Lenz's Law.
Based on this interpretation the rotating magnetized conductor N
machine/SPG is a method of eliciting the spatial energy without the
drag associated with the two piece machines.
The further conclusion is that mechanical energy is not "converted"
to electrical energy in an electrical generator. The idea of
"conversion" is simply an unproven assumption. Different electrical
machines produce energy with different efficiencies.
In these days of depletion of natural resources there would be no
reason to employ the induction generator of 150 years ago when
electricity could be generated much more efficiently by the simpler
one-piece N machine/SPG.
Page 5
REFERENCES:
(1) Martin, 1932, Thomas Martin (ed.), "Faraday's Diary",
Bell, 1932, in five volumes.
(2) Cramp and Norgrove, 1936, "Some Investigations on the
Axial Spin of a Magnet and on the Laws of Electromagnetic
Induction", Journal of The Institute of Electrical
Engineers, vol. 78, 1936, pp. 481-491.
(3) Crooks, Litvin, and Matthews, 1978, "One Piece Faraday
Generator: A Paradoxical Experiment from 1851", Am.
J. Phys., vol. 46(7), July 1978, pp. 729-731.
(4) Djuric, 1975, "Spinning Magnetic Fields", J. Appl. Phys.,
vol. 46, (2), February 1975, pp. 679-688.
(5) Kimball, 1926, A. L. Kimball, Jr., "Torque on a Revolving
Cylindrical Magnet", Phys. Rev., vol. 28, December 1928,
pp. 1302-1308.
(6) Zeleny, 1924, Zeleny and Page, "Torque on a Cylindrical
Magnet through which a Current is Passing", Phys. Rev.,
vol. 24, 14 July 1924, pp. 544-559.
(7) Kincheloe, 1986, "Homopolar 'Free Energy' Generator Test",
paper presented at the 1986 meeting of The Society for
Scientific Exploration, San Francisco, California, June
21, 1986, revised February 1, 1987. Address: Dr. W.
Robert Kincheloe, 401 Durand/ITV, Stanford, California
94305.
(8) DePalma, 1988, "Initial Testing Report of DePalma N-1
Electrical Generator", Magnets in Your Future, vol. 3(8),
August 1988, pp. 4-7, 27, P.O. Box 580, Temecula,
California 92390
(9) United States Department of Commerce, "Business Daily",
Tuesday, January 2, 1990, issue no. PSA-9999. "David
Taylor Research Center, code 3311, Annapolis, Maryland
21402-5067: A Research and Development Source Sought.
Broad Agency Announcement for Homopolar Machinery and
Current Collector Technology." BAA details requirements
for homopolar machinery for ship propulsion. Power
range 25,000 to 50,000 horsepower at anticipated current
levels of 50,000 to 100,000 amperes. Superconducting
magnets and liquid metal current collectors are called
for. "Field magnets can be normal or superconductive and
located internal to the rotor or external to the stator."
Describes combination of N machine/SPG connected to
Faraday disc motor for "integrated electric drive" ship
propulsion.
(10) Paramahamsa Tewari, "Beyond Matter", Printwell
Publications, Aligarh, India, 1984.
(11) Paramahamsa Tewari, "Generation of Electrical Power from
Absolute Vacuum by High Speed Rotation of Conducting
Magnetic Cylinder", Magnets in Your Future, vol. 1 (8),
August 1986, P.O. Box 580, Temecula, California 92390.
Page 6
(12) Paramahamsa Tewari, "Violation of Conservation of Charge
in Space Power Generation Phenomenon", Paramahamsa Tewari,
Chief Project Engineer, KAIGA Project, Nuclear Power
Corporation, Kodibagh-581303, Karwar, Karnataka, India.
(13) Paramahamsa Tewari, "Detection of Stationary and Dynamic
Space Substratum", paper presented at 1990 Borderland
Sciences Congress, Santa Barbara, California, June 14-17,
1990. Borderland Sciences, P.O. Box 429, Garberville,
California 95440-049, U.S.A.
(The following figure had an accompanying drawing
which could not be reproduced in this text file.)
Figure (2) Test of a rotating magnet by Michael Faraday, December
26, 1831.
255. A copper disc was cemented on the top of a cylinder
magnet, paper intervening, the top being the marked pole;
the magnet supported so as to rotate by means of string,
and the wires of the galvanometer connected with the edge
and the axis of the copper plate.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard notes...
The diagram below is to clarify the arrangement of the coil,
copper disc and paper insulator.
|
String --------> |
____|____
| : |
Suspended | : |
Cylinder ---> | : |
Magnet | : <----------Magnetic AXIS
| : |
| : |
| : |
|____:____|
Paper Insulator -----> ======:======
Copper Disc ----> ******:******<-------| (edge)
/|\ |
* * * * * * * * | ____|____
Copper Disc glued to (axis)| | |
paper insulator glued to |_________| |
end of magnet pole | Volt |
* * * * * * * * | Meter |
|_________|
The following description from Faraday's notes is a bit
imprecise, it seems that the term screw indicates CW and
unscrew indicates CCW.
If this is the correct translation then this is simply a change
in direction of the induced current.
This comes about when both the copper disc and magnet are
rotated together.
Page 7
--------------------------------------------------------------------
When the magnet and disc (are rotated) together, (by)
unscrew(ing or adjusting the ammeter) the marked end of the
needle went west.
When the magnet and disc (are) rotated (by) screw(ing or
adjusting the ammeter) the marked end of the needle went east.
256. This direction is the same as that which would have
resulted if the copper had moved and the magnet been still.
Hence moving the magnet causes no difference PROVIDED the
copper moves. A rotating and a stationary magnet cause the
same effect.
257. The disc was then loosed from the magnet and held still
whilst the magnet itself was revolved; but now no effect upon
the galvanometer.
Hence it appears that, of the metal circuit in which the
current is to be formed, different parts must move with
DIFFERENT ANGULAR VELOCITIES. (another KEY principle)
If with the same, no current is produced, i.e. when both parts
are external to the magnet.
(The other figures were not reproducible in this text file.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 8
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/dpalma2.asc
+198
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
December 7, 1990
DPALMA2.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXT FILE NOTES:
The following is a letter to Dr. Bruce DePalma from Paramahamsa
Tewari. The source for this was "The DePalma Research Papers" which
was printed by For The People, P.O. 15999, Tampa, FL 33684.
If anyone is interested in other DePalma papers, send email to:
Mark
The Outer Limits BBS
300-2400 baud
(304) 327-7452
Monday-Friday
8:00am - 7:00pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION FAX No. 08382 6045
(A Govt. of India Enterprise) TELEPHONE: Off: 7130
Res: 7194
STD Code: 08382 Gram: KYGAPOWER Karwar
Telex: 08602 201 KYGA
P. TEWARI KAIGA PROJECT
Chief Project Engineer
Kodibag - 581 303,
Karwar, Karnataka.
INDIA.
DO No. Kaiga-1&2/CPE/00120/90/S/287 August 13, 1990
Dear Mr. DePalma,
I received your paper on "On the possibility of Extraction of
Electrical Energy Directly from Space" dated 29th April 1990 quite
some time ago.
I was very satisfied to see that you have appropriately placed the
discovery of N-Effect, N-Machine and Space Power Generator and given
in brief the historical background starting from Faraday disc in
1831. The paper makes an interesting reading and I am sure it will
be a historical document.
The main reason for me to have not acknowledged the receipt of your
valuable paper was my total pre-occupation in addition to the
project's responsibility, with the development of a very new system
Page 1
of space power generation in which the magnetic circuit has been
divided into two parts - one part stationary and the other rotating.
I was keen that I should write to you on the findings of the result
with this latest machine and as you know very well it has taken
couple of months to develop this system. The tests are yet to be
completed.
However, it has been now observed through experiments that the
present Space Power Generator which has 1/3 of the weight of the
previous one described in my paper "Detection of Stationary and
Dynamic Space Substratum", has the ratings of similar generated
voltage and power while its efficiency can go higher than the
previous machine.
I expect to get the efficiency of this machine in the range of 500%
to 600%. The reduction in the weight of the machine has become
possible due to the segregation in the magnetic circuit. Only that
part is kept in rotation on which the electro-magnet is mounted.
I expect that total tests on this machine should be completed within
4 - 6 weeks and after that I will send you all the details.
It has now become very evident that generation of electrical power
can be achieved through a commercially viable system, which may take
about 5 KW of total power for rotation and yet generate about 30 KW
of net electrical putput.
I was very glad to learn from Dr. Tom Brown that you would be
reading my paper in the International Conference organised by
Borderland Sciences Research Foundation. I am sure the delebrations
in the conference would have been excellent.
With best wishes,
Yours sincerely,
(P. Tewari)
Mr. Bruce DePalma,
U.S.A.
____________________________________________________________________
Regd. Office: 424-425, World Trade Centre, Barakhamba Lane,
Connaught Place New Delhi-110 001.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Note...
I (Jerry Decker) had the good fortune to attend the Borderland
Sciences 1st Congress. It was a good conference with many
interesting speakers. Bruce DePalma read Tewari's paper and
showed his N-Machine which uses mercury as a contact point. The
unit is enclosed in a plastic housing to prevent fine mercury
particles from being ejected into the open air.
DePalma also showed one of his original suspended gyroscopes
which showed a distinct variation in the weight and movement of
a spinning mass long before the Japanese experiment which gained
so much publicity.
Page 2
Bruce told of one of his experiments which used grass as a
gravity detector. He built a mount above a rotating phonograph
turntable which held a pie pan with earth and grass seed.
When the turntable spun, it caused the grass to grow higher.
A large weight was added to the turntable, the grass grew even
higher as if the gravity in the area were somehow reduced.
Another experiment using a similar technique was to mount the
pie pan holding the earth and grass seed directly onto the
spinning turntable.
As the turntable spun, the grass grew higher than normal and
slightly in TOWARDS the axial shaft of the turntable, this EVEN
THOUGH THE PAN AND THE TURNTABLE WERE NOT PHYSICALLY CONNECTED.
When a weighted mass was added to the spinning turntable and pie
pan, the grass grew at a definitely increased angle towards the
axial shaft of the spinning mass.
Another phenomenon he mentioned was the slowing down of a clock
when in the presence of such a field.
KEELY RESEARCHERS TAKE NOTE OF THIS PHENOMENON!!
Remember that Keely stated that TIME IS GRAVITY!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/dpalma3.asc
+330
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
December 7, 1990
DPALMA3.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXT FILE NOTES:
The following paper by Dr. Bruce DePalma was issued with no
copyright as a gift to the world. There are no USA patents on the
described technology. The source for this was "The DePalma Research
Papers" which was printed by For The People, P.O. 15999, Tampa, FL
33684. The figures mentioned could not be reproduced in this text
file.
If anyone is interested in other DePalma papers, send email to:
Mark
The Outer Limits BBS
300-2400 baud
(304) 327-7452
Monday-Friday
8:00am - 7:00pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
DePalma Institute,
Bruce E. DePalma,
1055 Channel Drive,
Santa Barbara, California 93108
released February 2, 1984
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Report #25 The Secret of the Faraday Disc
In December of 1831, over 152 years ago, it was Michael Faraday who
first interposed a copper disc which could be rotated between the
poles of a magnet with the field lines perpendicular to the rotating
disc.
Faraday discovered a voltage which could be generated between the
center and the outer edge of the rotating conducting disc. This
voltage which was the output of the then to become known Faraday
Homopolar Disc generator is extracted by sliding contacts or brushs,
one on the axle and the other on the outer periphery of the rotated
conducting disc. Figure (1).
The Faraday disc generator was developed in the late 1890s and the
early part of this century to be a high power, low voltage d.c.
Page 1
machine suitable for industrial applications. The behavior of the
machine thus constructed was totally in line with the behavior of
other electrical machinery in the sense the generation of power by
the machine was accompanied always by a commensurate drag to insure
the idea of a conversion from mechanical to electrical energy was
supported.
Implicit in this was the unstated support of the religious belief
that no work could be obtained without the expenditure of an
'equivalent' amount of mechanical energy.
Of course there are other religious beliefs which say that energy is
an inexhaustable resource, but until the invention of a practical
free-energy machine this point stays moot.
A long history of the development of electrical machinery starting
with the Faraday disc of figure one lead me to construct the combin-
ation, figure (2).
Here, instead of the magnetic flux path being closed in a yoke
around the disc, the magnetic flux path is closed symmetrically
through the disc with the flux linkages traveling N-3 through the
radially symmetrical central portion of the path through the center
of the disc; while the return path travels 3-N symmetrically through
the outer periphery of the disc.
A plot of the voltage profile in the disc, figure (3), shows a curve
typical of currently encountered flux densities and rotational
speeds.
The voltages are nominal values measured with one sliding contact on
the axle and the other exploring the voltage profile on the surface
of the rotating conducting disc. Several things are apparent. The
voltage present at any radius of the rotating disc depends only on
the flux density and tangential velocity of the disc at that point.
Thus it is clear from this that the voltage obtainable from a
sliding contact at the edge of the rotating disc with respect of the
central axis is not the sum of the voltages appearing in the disc.
We can conceive electricity as a source-sink phenomenon. That is,
electrons can appear at a negative pole and be absorbed at the
positive pole.
In terms of the operation of the Faraday disc with the magnetic
field closed through the disc, this means the current flow with a
load interposed between brushs placed on the outer edge and central
axis of the disc, will be as shown by the arrows on figure (3).
When the flux path is closed through the disc, the electrical pole
normally residing on the axis or center of the disc is displaced
radially.
The radial displacement of the positive pole to the radius r1 means
that with the indicated current flow the inner portion of the
machine may be made to motor against the drag created by the
extraction of electricity from the edge of the machine vs the
center.
Page 2
The torque (or drag) created by the motoring action of a Faraday
disc is proportional to the total flux linkages passing through the
area of the disc illuminated by the magnetic field.
In the example shown the central area is (Pi x r1 ^2), and the area
of the peripheral annular ring is (Pi x ((r3 ^2) - (r2 ^2))).
With a machine operated at magnetic saturation it is easy to see
that with the above areas made equal drag from the machine will
disappear.
The Faraday disc uses inertial (centrifugal) and magnetic forces to
elicit the pattern of electrical potential on the rotating disc.
The production of electrical energy from a Faraday disc with the
flux path closed through the disc, an N machine, without drag is
just a violation of a completely unsubstantiated supposition that
mechanical work input to the machine must be provided when
electrical power is withdrawn.
On the practical side the operation of the machine is unaffected
whether the magnets are rotated with disc or not and the machine may
be made self exciting by cutting a spiral into the portion of the
disc covering the central pole face.
Rotation of the magnets and disc together facilitates the seriesing
of machines to provide higher output voltages while retaining input
and output poles on the axles of the machine.
The secret of the Faraday disc thus simply becomes:
the Faraday disc is a free-energy machine.
The anti-torques experienced in the early use of the machine
supported a work-ethic paradigm which was not questioned.
When the magnetic flux path is closed symmetrically through the disc
instead of around the disc as in the early machines the drag
associated with the flow of current disappears.
An interesting thought is the drag is really an anti-torque created
by something which passes through the disc and motors it in the
opposite direction to the direction which would be created when it
was electron current which was flowing through the disc.
An interpretation consistant with the Lenz Law interpretation of the
drag against a current carrying wire moving with linear velocity
perpendicular to lines of magnetic flux linkage can be developed out
of this.
It may well be that when electrons are liberated from the edge of a
Faraday disc with the circuit completed to the center; what flows
through the disc may not be electrons.
It may well be that a hole current completes the path through the
disc. When current carrying conductors are moving through magnetic
fields it may well be that electrons are not flowing through those
portions of the moving conductors in which electricity is being
'generated'.
Page 3
Consideration will show that electron flow through a wire moving
perpendicular to a magnetic field should assist the motion of the
wire.
The centrifugal extraction of energy from the inertial field of
space was first demonstrated by Faraday in 1831.
The proper interpretation of the experiment as a free energy machine
has taken some time since the other possibility, of closing the flux
path through the disc has never been thought of.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard notes...
The diagram below is to clarify the arrangement of the coil, copper
disc and paper insulator.
|
String --------> |
____|____
| : |
Suspended | : |
Cylinder ---> | : |
Magnet | : <----------Magnetic AXIS
| : |
| : |
| : |
|____:____|
Paper Insulator -----> ======:======
Copper Disc ----> ******:******<-------| (edge)
/|\ |
* * * * * * * * | ____|____
Copper Disc glued to (axis)| | |
paper insulator glued to |_________| |
end of magnet pole | Volt |
* * * * * * * * | Meter |
|_________|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The following description from Faraday's notes is a bit imprecise,
it seems that the term screw indicates CW and unscrew indicates CCW.
If this is the correct translation then this is simply a change in
direction of the induced current.
This comes about when both the copper disc and magnet are rotated
together.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
In Faraday's own words (somewhat annotated) :
When the magnet and disc (are rotated) together, (by)
unscrew(ing or adjusting the ammeter) the marked end of the
needle went west.
When the magnet and disc (are) rotated (by) screw(ing or
adjusting the ammeter) the marked end of the needle went east.
Page 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 5
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/dpalma4.asc
+248
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
December 16, 1990
DPALMA4.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXT FILE NOTES:
The source for this paper was "The DePalma Research Papers" which
was printed by For The People, P.O. 15999, Tampa, FL 33684. The
figures mentioned could not be reproduced in this text file.
If anyone is interested in other DePalma papers, call:
The Outer Limits BBS
300-2400 baud
(304) 327-7452
Monday-Friday
8:00am - 7:00pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
VIOLATION OF LAW OF CONSERVATION OF CHARGE
IN SPACE POWER GENERATION PHENOMENON
By
PARAMAHAMSA TEWARI
Chief Project Engineer
Kaiga Project
NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION
Karwar
INDIA
INTRODUCTION:
It has been hitherto believed in physics that the total electric
charge in the Universe is a constant quantity, and if additional
charge appears in some region, it is only at the expense of the
charge deficit in some other regions.
It is a basic law that electric charge is conserved and cannot be
destroyed or created. Precise experiments on a Space Power
Generator (SPG) which has been now further developed to demonstrate
the commercial viability of the newly discovered phenomenon of space
power generation however, totally violate the existing law of
conservation of charge, by generating output electrical power much
in excess of the input electrical power.
Since electric charge is a form of basic energy, the law of
conservation of energy will need to be enlarged to incorporate in it
Page 1
the dynamics of absolute vacuum [1] which in a state of rotation
generates fundamental field to produce electrical charge and energy.
DESCRIPTION OF THE SPG:
The SPG shown in Fig. 1 is a further developed form of the machines
described [2,3] in earlier issues of this magazine.
A non-magnetic shaft interconnects two mild steel rotors on which
two electromagnets are mounted. Electric power at 1.5 volt d-c and
high ampheres is drawn from each unit, with the help of copper-
graphite brushes when the machine runs at 2860 rpm directly coupled
and driven by an induction motor.
The power is drawn between the inner rotor's cylindrical surface and
the shaft through d-c shunts that enable measurements of high d-c
current.
The SPG weighs about 150 Kg. and is fabricated out of 120 mm thick
mild steel plate. The two units enable generation of power at more
than 3 volt d-c by appropriate series connections between the two
coils. The electromagnet's coils are 16 swg super enamelled wire
with 216 turns in each coil.
The feature that brings improvements [4] in this machine is the
larger diameter of the rotors that produces higher d-c voltage at
comparatively lower speed, not exceeding 3000 rpm. Also the twin
units with single coil in each unit double the amount of power.
TEST RESULTS:
The drive motor (DM) takes no-load current of 2.6 amperes (1300
watts) to rotate itself and the SPG to overcome windage and friction
at 2870 rpm. The no-load voltage internally generated in each unit
of the SPG is adjusted to 1.5 volts d-c between the shaft and the
inner rotor by the control of the d-c excitation current in the two
electromagnet's coils connected in series.
The excitation current is 31 amperes, the total d-c resistance of
the two coils being 2.5 ohms. The power given to the electromagnets
is 31 x 31 x 2.5, that is, 2400 watts. The two shunts with
calibration of 2000 amperes for 75 mv are now connected across the
two output circuits.
The d-c currents measured in each circuit are almost equal to 2613
amperes corresponding to 98 mv reading of the shunt.
The output electrical power of each unit is 2613 x 1.5 watts, that
is, 3919 watts. Total electrical power from the two units is 7839
watts.
As the SPG is electrically loaded, the current of DM rises to 10
amperes, showing a rise of 7.4 amperes over the no-load current, and
corresponding to a rise in input electrical power of 3700 watts.
The load current of the DM of 10 amperes amounts to the total
electrical input to the DM of 5000 watts, out of which 1300 watts is
utilised to overcome the no-load losses.
Page 2
The remaining electrical input of 3700 watts generates 7839 watts of
electrical output power, giving the efficiency of space power
generation in this particular as 211.8%.
Assuming electromagnetic efficiency of the DM as 80%, the efficiency
of the electrical energy generation of the SPG will rise to 264.75%.
If the excitation power of 2400 watts given to the SPG is deducted
from the total electrical output from the SPG of 7839 watts, the
balance electrical output of 5439 watts still exceeds the total
electrical input of 5000 watts by 439 watts, giving the total system
efficiency of 105.9% while, in addition the DM-SPG set runs as a
perpetual system drawing 1300 watts of power from space.
QUANTUM OF SPACE POWER:
The quantum of electrical charge produced due to the rotation of
space in a rotating electromagnet and the electrical power produced
when the power is withdrawn through an electric circuit, as
discussed in earlier article [2], is given by,
P = (1.8) LN(r^2)(10^-5)kW
(1)
where, P is power in kW, L is axial length of the SPG in centimeter,
N is revolution per second, and 'r' is the radius in centimeter of
the SPG on the inner rotor surface.
The derivation of the above relation was based on the assumption
that the radius of the spherical void at the centre of electron as
discussed in space vortex theory [1,2] is 1.5 x (10^-11) cm.
More precise measurements in space power generation experiments,
however show that the coefficient 1.8 in equation (1) should be 2.5,
and the void radius at electron's centre should be taken as 10^-11
cm. With these corrections the space power equation (1) now
becomes:
P = (2.5) LN(r^2)(10^-5)kW
(2)
substituting the values, L=12, N=47.6, and r=11.43 in (2),
P = 5.85 kW
Since there are two units of the SPG on the shaft, total power from
the two units will be 11.7 kW, which is 1.5 times the output power
drawn from the machine in the above test.
With additional brushes and reduced contacts at about 3000 rpm, the
above machine will have capacity to produce about 12 kW of power.
If the SPG is driven at 6000 rpm both the voltages and currents will
be doubled, producing 4 times output of 48 kW. Since the excitation
power remains constant, much higher total system efficiency is
expected though the efficiency of the SPG as computed above will
remain constant at 211.8%.
Page 3
CONCLUSION:
Mass-energy equation of Einstein brought forth an universal law that
an electron like all matter contains in its structure energy. A
further enlargement of this law is that electron is itself energy,
where "energy" in physical terms is a state of vacuum in rotation.
Even at ordinary speed of rotation of an electromagnet, the inter-
atomic space of the iron core develops velocity fields of vacuum
that qualitatively act like additional charge within the rotating
system and liberate orbital electrons of the iron atoms.
With the interaction of the magnetic field the free electrons form
polarites [2,3].
It is possible to commercially develop a machine that can not only
rotate itself perpetually but also generate additional electrical
charge in kilowatts and higher range.
The law of conservation of charge and the law of conservation of
energy are applicable within the systems confined to material
interactions alone and not to the medium of space which is a dynamic
entity that can rotate and create charge at ordinary speeds, and can
rotate and create electrons at speed of light.
REFERENCES:
1. Paramahamsa Tewari - "Beyond Matter", Printwell Publications,
Aligarh, India (1984).
2. Paramahamsa Tewari - "Generation of Electrical Power from
Absolute Vacuum by High Speed Rotation of conducting Magnetic
Cylinder",
Magnets in Your Future, Vol. 1 No. 8, August 1986, P.O. Box 580,
Temecula, CA 92390, USA.
3. Paramahamsa Tewari - "Interaction of Electron and Magnetic Field
in Space Power Generation Phenomenon", Magnets in Your Future,
Vol. 2 No. 12, December 1987, P.O. Box 580, Temecula, Ca. 92390,
USA.
4. Report on the Initial Testing Phase of DePalma Energy
Corporation, N1 Electrical Power Generator, 6-1-1988 -
Bruce DePalma, DePalma Energy Corporation, 1060 Channel Drive,
Santa Barbara, California
93108, (805) 969-6442.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This paper courtesy of Paul Smith.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/dpalma5.asc
+990
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,990 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
December 16, 1990
DPALMA5.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file courtesy of Paul Smith.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXT FILE NOTES:
The source for the following paper was "The DePalma Research Papers"
which was printed by For The People, P.O. 15999, Tampa, FL 33684.
Most of the figures mentioned could not be reproduced in this text
file. No U.S. copyrights or patents exist on the technology
discussed.
If anyone is interested in other DePalma papers, call:
The Outer Limits BBS
300-2400 baud
(304) 327-7452
Monday-Friday
8:00am - 7:00pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
HOMOPOLAR "FREE-ENERGY" GENERATOR TEST
Robert Kincheloe
Professor of Electrical Engineering (Emeritus)
Stanford University
Paper presented at the 1986 meeting
of the
Society for Scientific Exploration
San Francisco
June 21, 1986
Revised February 1, 1987
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 1
HOMOPOLAR "FREE-ENERGY" GENERATOR TEST
Robert Kincheloe
ABSTRACT
Known for over 150 years, the Faraday homopolar generator has been
claimed to provide a basis for so-called "free-energy" generation,
in that under certain conditions the extraction of electrical output
energy is not reflected as a corresponding mechanical load to the
driving source.
During 1985 I was invited to test such a machine. While it did not
perform as claimed, repeatable data showed anomalous results that
did not seem to conform to traditional theory.
In particular, under certain assumptions about internally generated
output voltage, the increase in input power when power was extracted
from the generator over that measured due to frictional losses with
the generator unexcited seemed to be either about 13% or 20% of the
maximum computed generated power, depending on interpretation.
The paper briefly reviews the homopolar generator, describes the
tests on this particular machine, summarizes and presents tentative
conclusions from the resulting data.
THE SUNBURST HOMOPOLAR GENERATOR
In July, 1985, I became aware of and was invited to examine and test
a so-called free-energy generator known as the Sunburst N Machine.
This device, shown in Figs 1a and 1b, was proposed by Bruce DePalma
and constructed by Charya Bernard of the Sunburst Community in Santa
Barbara, CA, about 1979.
The term "free-energy" refers to the claim by DePalma [1] (and
others [2]) that it was capable of producing electrical output power
that was not reflected as a mechanical load to the driving mechanism
but derived from presumed latent spatial energy.
Apart from mechanical frictional and electrical losses inherent in
the particular construction, the technique employed was claimed to
provide a basis for constructing a generator which could supply the
energy to provide not only its own motive power but also additional
energy for external use. From August 1985 to April 1986 I made a
series of measurements on this particular machine to test these
claims.
GENERATOR DESCRIPTION
Details of the generator construction are shown in Figs. 2 and 3.
It consists essentially of an electromagnet formed by a coil of 3605
turns of #10 copper wire around a soft iron core which can be
rotated with the magnetic field parallel to and symmetrical around
the axis of rotation.
At each end of the magnet are conducting bronze cylindrical plates,
on one of which are arranged (as shown in Fig. 3) one set of
graphite brushes for extracting output current between the shaft and
Page 2
the outer circumference and a second set of metering brushes for
independently measuring the induced voltage between these locations.
A third pair of brushes and slip rings supply the current for the
electromagnet. A thick sheath of epoxy-impregnated fiberglass
windings allow the magnet to be rotated at high speed.
The generator may be recognized as a so-called homopolar, or acyclic
machine, a device first investigated and described by Michael
Faraday [3] in 1831 (Figs. 4,5) and shown schematically in Fig. 6.
It consists of a cylindrical conducting disk immersed in an axial
magnetic field, and can be operated as a generator with sliding
brushes extracting current from the voltage induced between the
inner and outer regions of the disk when the rotational energy is
supplied by an external driving source.
The magnitude of the incremental radial generated voltage is
proportional to both the strength of the magnetic field and the
tangential velocity, so that in a uniform magnetic field the total
voltage is proportional to the product of speed times the difference
between the squares of the inner and outer brush radii.
The device may also be used as a motor when an external voltage
produces an radial current between the sliding brushes.
There have been a number of commercial applications of homopolar
motors and generators, particularly early in this century [4], and
their operating principles are described in a number of texts [5].
The usual technique is to use a stationary magnet to produce the
magnetic field in which the conducting disk (or cylinder) is
rotated.
Faraday found, however, (Fig 7) that it does not matter whether the
magnet itself is stationary or rotating with the disk as long as the
conductor is moving in the field, but that rotating the magnet with
the conducting disk stationary did not produce an induced voltage.
He concluded that a magnetic field is a property of space itself,
not attached to the magnet which serves to induce the field [6].
DePalma stated [7] that when the conducting disk is attached to a
rotating magnet, the interaction of the primary magnetic field with
that produced by the radial output current results in torque between
the disk and the magnet structure which is not reflected back to the
mechanical driving source.
Lenz's law therefore does not apply, and the extraction of output
energy does not require additional driving power. This is the
claimed basis for extracting "free" energy.
Discussions of the torque experienced by a rotating magnet are also
discussed in the literature [8].
Because the simple form shown in Fig. 6 has essentially one
conducting path, such a homopolar device is characterized by low
voltage and high current requiring a large magnetic field for useful
operation.
Page 3
Various homopolar devices have been used for specialized
applications [9] (such as generators for developing large currents
for welding, ship degaussing, liquid metal magnetohydrodynamic pumps
for nuclear reactor cooling, torquemotors for propulsion, etc.),
some involving quite high power.
These have been extensively discussed in the literature, dealing
with such problems as developing the high magnetic fields required
(sometimes using superconducting magnets in air to avoid iron
saturation effects), the development of brushes that can handle the
very high currents and have low voltage drop because of the low
output voltage generated, and with counteracting armature reaction
which otherwise would reduce the output voltage because of the
magnetic field distortion resulting from the high currents.
From the standpoint of prior art, the design of the Sunburst
generator is inefficient and not suitable for power generation:
1. The magnetic field is concentrated near the axis where
the tangential velocity is low, reducing the generated
voltage.
2. Approximately 4 kilowatts of power are required to
energize the magnet, developing enough heat so that the
device can only be operated for limited periods of time.
3. The graphite brushes used have a voltage drop almost
equal to the total induced voltage, so that almost all of
the generated power is consumed in heating the brushes.
4. The large contacting area (over 30 square inches) of
the brushes needed for the high output current creates
considerable friction loss.
Since this machine was not intended as a practical generator but as
a means for testing the free energy principle, however, from this
point of view efficiency in producing external power was not
required or relevant.
DEPALMA'S RESULTS WITH THE SUNBURST HOMOPOLAR GENERATOR
In 1980 DePalma conducted tests with the Sunburst generator,
describing his measurement technique and results in an unpublished
report [10].
The generator was driven by a 3 phase a-c 40 horsepower motor by a
belt coupling sufficiently long that magnetic fields of the motor
and generator would not interact. A table from this report giving
his data and results is shown in Fig. 8.
For a rotational speed of 6000 rpm an output power of 7560 watts was
claimed to require an increase of 268 watts of drive power over that
required to supply losses due to friction, windage, etc. as measured
with the output switch open.
If valid, this would mean that the output power was 28.2 times the
incremental input power needed to produce it. Several assumptions
were made in this analysis:
Page 4
1. The drive motor input power was assumed to be the product
of the line voltage and current times the appropriate factor
for a three-phase machine and an assumed constant 70% power
factor.
There was apparently no consideration of phase angle
change as the motor load increased. This gives optimistic
results, since consideration of phase angle is necessary
for calculating power in an a-c circuit, particularly with
induction motors.
It might also be noted that the measured incremental line
current increase of 0.5 ampere (3.3%) as obtained with the
analog clamp-on a-c ammeter that was used was of limited
accuracy.
2. The output power of the generator was taken to be the
product of the measured output current and the internally
generated voltage in the disk less the voltage drop due only
to internal disk resistance. Armature reaction was thus
neglected or assumed not to be significant.
3. The generated voltage which produced the current in the main
output brushes was assumed to be the same as that measured
at the metering brushes, and the decrease in metered voltage
from 1.5 to 1.05 volts when the output switch is closed was
assumed to be due to the internal voltage drop resulting
from the output current flowing through the internal disk
resistance that is common to both sets of brushes and
calculated to 62.5 microohms.
Of these, the first assumption seems the most serious, and it is my
opinion that the results of this particular test were inaccurate.
Tim Wilhelm of Stelle, Illinois, who witnessed tests of the Sunburst
generator in 1981, had a similar opinion [11].
RECENT TESTS OF THE SUNBURST GENERATOR
Being intrigued by DePalma's hypothesis, I accepted the offer by Mr.
Norman Paulsen, founder of the Sunburst Community, to conduct tests
on the generator which apparently had not been used since the tests
by DePalma and Bernard in 1979.
Experimental Setup
A schematic diagram of the test arrangement is shown in Fig. 9, with
the physical equipment shown in Fig. 10. The generator is shown
coupled by a long belt to the drive motor behind it, together with
the power supplies and metering both contained within and external
to the Sunburst power and metering cabinet.
Figure 10b shows the panel of the test cabinet which provided power
for the generator magnet and motor field. The 4-1/2 digit meters on
the panel were not functional and were not used; external meters
were supplied.
I decided to use an avaiable shunt-field d-c drive motor to
facilitate load tests at different speeds and to simplify accurate
motor input power measurements.
Page 5
Referring to Figure 9, variacs and full-wave bridge rectifiers
provided variable d-c supplies for the motor armature and field and
the homopolar generator magnet.
Voltages and currents were measured with Micronta model 11-191 3-1/2
digit meters calibrated to better than 0.1% against a Hewlett
Packard 740B Voltage Standard that by itself was accurate to better
than .005%.
Standard meter shunts together with the digital voltmeters were used
to measure the various currents. With this arrangement the
generator speed could be varied smoothly from 0 to over 7000 rpm,
with accurate measurement of motor input power, metered generator
output voltage Vg and generator output current Ig.
Speed was measured with a General Radio model 1531 Strobotac which
had a calibration accuracy of better than 2% (as verified with a
frequency counter) and which allowed determination of relative speed
changes of a few rpm of less.
Small changes in either load or input power were clearly evident
because of the sensitivity of the Strobotac speed measurement,
allowing the motor input power to be adjusted with the armature
voltage variac to obtain the desired constant speed with no
acceleration or deceleration before taking readings from the various
meters.
Generator Tests
Various tests were conducted with the output switch open to confirm
that generated voltage at both the output brushes (Vbr) and metering
brushes (Vg) were proportional to speed and magnetic field, with the
polarity reversing when magnetic field or direction of rotation were
reversed.
Tracking of Vbr and Vg with variation of magnetic field is shown in
Fig. 11, in which it is seen that the output voltages are not quite
linearly related to magnet current, probably due to core saturation.
The more rapid departure of Vg from linearity may be due to the
different brush locations as seen on Fig 3, differences in the
magnetic field at the different brush locations, or other causes not
evident. An expanded plot of this voltage difference is shown in
Fig. 12, and is seen to considerably exceed meter error tolerances.
Figure 11 also shows an approximate 300 watt increase in drive motor
armature power as the magnet field was increased from 0 to 19
amperes.
(The scatter of input power measurements shown in the upper curve of
Fig. 11 resulted from the great sensitivity of the motor armature
current to small fluctuations in power line voltage, since the large
rotary inertia of the 400 pound generator did not allow speed to
rapidly follow line voltage changes).
At first it was thought that this power loss might be due to the
fact that the outer output brushes were arranged in a rectangular
array as shown in Fig. 3.
Page 6
Since they were connected in parallel but not equidistant from the
axis the different generated voltages would presumably result in
circulating currents and additional power dissipation.
Measurement of the generated voltage as a function of radial
distance from the axis as shown in Fig. 13, however, showed that
almost all of the voltage differential occurred between 5 and 12 cm,
presumably because this was the region of greatest magnetic field
due to the centralized iron core.
The voltage in the region of the outer brushes was almost constant,
with a measured variation of only 3.7% between the extremes, so that
this did not seem to explain the increase in input power. The other
likely explanation seems to be that there are internal losses in the
core and other parts of the metal structure due to eddy currents,
since these are also moving conductors in the field.
In any event, the increase in drive power was only about 10% for the
maximum magnet current of 19 amperes.
Figure 14 typifies a number of measurements of input power and
generator performance as a function of speed and various generator
conditions.
Since the generator output knife switch procedure was very stiff and
difficult to operate the procedure used was to make a complete speed
run from zero to the maximum speed and descending again to zero with
the switch open, taking readings at each speed increment with the
magnet power both off and on.
The procedure was then repeated with the switch closed. (It was
noted that during the descending speed run the input power was a few
percent lower than for the same speed during the earlier ascending
speed run; this was presumably due to reduced friction as the
brushes and/or bearings became heated. In plotting the data the
losses for both runs were averaged which gave a conservative result
since the losses shown in the figures exceed the minimum values
measured).
The upper curve (a) shows the motor armature input power with a
constant motor field current of 6 amperes as the speed is varied
with no generator magnet excitation and is seen to reach a maximum
of 4782 watts as the speed is increased to 6500 rpm.
This presumably represents the power required to overcome friction
and windage losses in the motor, generator, and drive belt, and are
assumed to remain essentially constant whether the generator is
producing power or not [12].
Curve 14b shows the increase of motor armature power over that of
curve (a) that results from energizing the generator magnet with a
current of 16 amperes but with the generator output switch open so
that there is no output current (and hence no output power
dissippation).
This component of power (which is related to the increase of drive
motor power with increased magnet current as shown in Fig. 11 as
discussed above) might also be present whether or not the generator
is producing output current and power, although this is not so
Page 7
evident since the output current may affect the magnetic field
distribution.
Curve 14c shows the further increase of motor armature input power
over that of curves (a) plus (b) that results when the output switch
is closed, the generator magnet is energized and output current is
produced.
It is certainly not zero or negligible but rises to a maximum of 802
watts at 6500 rpm. The total motor armature input power under these
conditions is thus the sum of (a), (b), and (c) and reaches a
maximum of 6028 watts at 6500 rpm.
The big question has to do with the generated output power. The
measured output current at 6500 rpm was 4776 amperes; the voltage at
the metering brushes was 1.07 volts.
Using a correction factor derived from Fig. 12 and assuming a common
internal voltage drop due to a calculated disk resistance of 38
microohms, a computed internal generated potential of 1.28 volts is
obtained which if multiplied by the measured output current
indicates a generated power of 6113 watts.
All of this power is presumably dissipated in the internal and
external circuit resistances, the brush loss due both to the brush
resistance and the voltage drops at the contact surfaces between the
brushes and the disk (essentially an arc discharge), and the power
dissipated in the 31.25 microohm meter shunt.
It still represents power generated by the machine, however, and
exceeds the 802 watts of increased motor drive power due solely to
closing the generator output switch and causing output current to
flow by a factor of 7.6 to 1.
If the 444 watts of increased input power that resulted from
energizing the magnet with the output switch open is assumed to have
been converted to generated output power and hence should be
included as part of the total increased drive motor power required
to produce generated output, the computed 6113 watts of generated
power still exceeds the total input power of 444 watts plus 802
watts by a factor of 4.9 to 1.
The computed output power even slightly exceeds the total motor
armature input power including all frictional and windage losses of
6028 watts under these conditions (although the total system
effeciency is still less than 100% because of the generator magnet
power of approximately 2300 watts and motor field power of about 144
watts which must be added to the motor armature power to obtain
total system input power).
It would thus seem that if the above assumptions are valid that
DePalma correctly predicted that much of the generated power with
this kind of machine is not reflected back to the motive source.
Figure 15 summarizes the data discussed above.
To further examine the question of the equivalence between the
internally generated voltage at the main output brushes and that
measured at the metering brushes, a test was made of the metered
voltage as a function of speed with the generator magnet energized
Page 8
with a current of 20 amperes both with the output switch open and
closed. The resulting data is shown in Fig. 16.
The voltage rises to about 1.32 volts at 6000 rpm with the switch
open (which is close to that obtained by DePalma) and drops 0.14
volts when the switch is closed and the measured output current is
3755 amperes, corresponding to an effective internal resistance of
37 microohms.
Even if this were due to other causes, such as armature reaction, it
does not seem likely that there would be a large potential drop
between the output and metering brushes because of the small
distance, low magnetic field (and radial differential voltage), and
large mass of conducting disk material.
Internal currents many times the measured output current of almost
4000 amperes would be required for the voltage difference between
the outer metering and output brushes to be significant and
invalidate the conclusions reached above.
A further method of testing the validity of the assumed generated
output potential involved an examination of the voltage drop across
the graphite brushes themselves.
Many texts on electrical machinery discuss the brush drop in
machines with commutators or slip rings.
All of those examined agree that graphite brushes typically have a
voltage drop that is essentially constant at approximately one volt
per brush contact when the current density rises above 10-15 amperes
per square centimeter.
To compare this with the Sunburst machine the total brush voltage
was calculated by subtracting the IR drop due to the output current
in the known (meter shunt) and calculated (disk, shaft, and brush
lead) resistances from the assumed internally generated output
voltage. The result in Fig. 17 shows that the brush drop obtained
in this way is even less than that usually assumed, as typified by
the superimposed curve taken from one text.
It thus seems probable that the generated voltage is not
significantly less than that obtained from the metering brushes, and
hence the appropriateness of the computed output power is supported.
CONCLUSIONS
We are therefore faced with the apparent result that the output
power obtained when the generator magnet is energized greatly
exceeds the increase in drive power over that needed to supply
losses with the magnet not energized. This is certainly anomalous
in terms of convential theory. Possible explanations?
1. There could be a large error in the measurements resulting
from some factor such as noise which caused the digital
meters to read incorrectly or grossly inaccurate current
shunt resistances.
If the measured results had shown that the computed generated output
power exceeded the input drive power by only a few percent this
Page 9
explanation would be reasonable and would suggest that more careful
calibration and measurements might show that the results described
above were due to measurement error.
With the data showing such a large ratio of generated power to input
power increase, however, in my opinion this explanation of the
results seems unlikely.
(A later test showed that the digital meters are insensitive to a
large a-c ripple superimposed on the measured d-c, but within their
rated accuracy of 0.1% give a true average value).
2. There could be a large difference between the measured
voltage at the metering brushes and the actual generated
voltage in the output brush circuit due to armature
reaction, differences in the external metering and output
circuit geometry, or other unexplained causes.
As discussed above the various data do not seem to support this
possibility.
3. DePalma may have been right in that there is indeed a
situation here whereby energy is being obtained from a
previously unknown and unexplained source.
This is a conclusion that most scientists and engineers would reject
out of hand as being a violation of accepted laws of physics, and if
true has incredible implications.
4. Perhaps other possibilities will occur to the reader.
The data obtained so far seems to have shown that while DePalma's
numbers were high, his basic premise has not been disproved. While
the Sunburst generator does not produce useful output power because
of the internal losses inherent in the design, a number of
techniques could be used to reduce the friction losses, increase the
total generated voltage and the fraction of generated power
delivered to an external load.
DePalma's claim of free energy generation could perhaps then be
examined.
I should mention, however, that the obvious application of using the
output of a "free-energy" generator to provide its own motive power,
and thus truly produce a source of free energy, has occured to a
number of people and several such machines have been built.
At least one of these known to me [13], using what seemed to be a
good design techniques, was unsuccessful.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
FOOTNOTES
1. DePalma, 1979a,b,c, 1981, 1983, 1984, etc.
2. For example, Satelite News, 1981, Marinov, 1984, etc.
3. Martin, 1932, vol. 1, p.381.
4. Das Gupta, 1961, 1962; Lamme, 1912, etc.
Page 10
5. See, for example, Bumby, 1983; Bewley, 1952; Kosow, 1964; Nasar,
1970.
6. There has been much discussion on this point in the literature,
and about interpretation of flux lines. Bewley, 1949; Cohn,
1949a,b; Crooks, 1978; Cullwick, 1957; Savage, 1949.
7. DePalma, op. cit.
8. Kimball, 1926; Zeleny, 1924.
9. Bumby, Das Gupta, op. cit.
10. DePalma, 1980.
11. Wilhelm, 1980, and personal communication.
12. The increase in motor losses with increased load are neglected
in this discussion because of a lack of accurate values for
armature and brush resistances, magnetic field distortion
resulting from armature reaction, etc. Such losses, while
small, would be appreciable, however; their inclusion would
further increase the ratio of generated to drive power so that
the results described are conservative.
13. Wilhelm, 1981, and personal communication.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
REFERENCES
[Bewley, 1949] - L. V. Bewley, letter re [Cohn, 1949a]; ELECTRICAL
ENGINEERING, Dec. 1949, p.1113-4. (Claims error in Cohn's paper)
[Bewley, 1952] - L. V. Bewley, FLUX LINKAGES & ELECTROMAGNETIC
INDUCTION, Macmillan, NY, 1952. (Explanation of induction
phenomena and the Faraday generator)
[Bumby, 1983] - J. R. Bumby, SUPERCONDUCTING ROTATING ELECTRICAL
MACHINES, Claredon Press, 1983. (Homopolar designs, high current
brushes including liquid metal)
[Cohn, 1949a] - George I. Cohn, "Electromagnetic Induction",
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, May 1949, p441-7. (Unipolar generator as
paradox)
[Cohn, 1949b] - George Cohn, letter re [Savage, 1949]; ELECTRICAL
ENGINEERING, Nov 1949, p1018. (Responds to criticism by Savage)
[Crooks, 1978] - M. J. Crooks et al, "One-piece Faraday generator:
A paradoxical experiment from 1851", Am. J. Phys. 46(7), July
1978, p729-31. (Derives Faraday generator performance using
Maxwell's equations)
[Cullwick, 1957] - E. G. Cullwick, ELECTROMAGNETISM AND RELATIVITY,
Longmans & Green, London, 1957. (Chapter 10, "A Rotating
Conducting Magnet", pp.141-60, discusses question of flux rotation
with magnet)
[Das Gupta, 1961] - A. K. Das Gupta, "Design of self-compensated
high current comparatively higher voltage homopolar generators",
AIEE Trans. Oct 1961, p567-73. (Discusses very high current
homopolar generator design)
[Das Gupta, 1962] - A. K. Das Gupta, "Commutatorless D-C generators
capable to supply currents more than one million amperes, etc"
Page 11
AIEE Trans. Oct 1962, p399-402. (Discusses very high current low
voltage Faraday generators)
[DePalma, 1979a] - Bruce DePalma, EXTRACTION OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY
DIRECTLY FROM SPACE: THE N-NACHINE, Simularity Institute, Santa
Barbara CA, 6 Mar 1979. (Discusses homopolar generator or N-
Machine as free-energy source)
[DePalma, 1979b] - Bruce DePalma, "The N-Machine", Paper given at
the World Symposium on Humanity, Pasadena, CA, 12 April 1979.
(Describes background, development of "free-energy" theories)
[DePalma, 1979c] - Bruce DePalma, ROTATION OF A MAGNETIZED
GYROSCOPE, Simularity Institute Report #33, 16 July 1979.
(Describes design of Sunburst homopolar generator)
[DePalma, 1980] - Bruce DePalma, "Performance of the Sunburst N
Machine", Simularity Institute, Santa Barbara, CA, 17 December
1980. (Description of tests and results)
[DePalma, 1981] - Bruce DePalma, "Studies on rotation leading to the
N-Machine", DePalma Institute, 1981 (transcript of talk?)
(Discusses experiments with gravity that led to development of
idea of free-energy machine)
[DePalma, 1983] - Bruce DePalma, THE ROTATION OF THE UNIVERSE,
DePalma Institute Report #83, Santa Barbara, CA, 25 July 1983.
(Uses Faraday disc to discuss universal principles).
[DePalma, 1984] - Bruce DePalma, THE SECRET OF THE FARADAY DISC,
DePalma Institute, Santa Barbara, CA, 2 Feb 1984. (Claims
explanation of Faraday disc as a free-energy device)
[Kimball, 1926] - A. L. Kimball, Jr., "Torque on revolving
cylindrical magnet", PHYS. REV. v.28, Dec 1928, p.1302-8.
(Alternative analysis of torque in a homopolar device to that of
Zeleny and Page, 1924)
[Kosow, 1964] - Irving L. Kosow, ELECTRICAL MACHINERY & CONTROL,
Prentice-Hall, 1964. (Discusses high current homopolar (acyclic)
generators)
[Lamme, 1912] - B. G. Lamme, "Development of a successful direct-
current 2000-kW unipolar generator", AIEE Trans. 28 June 1912,
p1811-40. (Early discussion of design of high power homopolar
generator)
[Marinov, 1984]- Stefan Marinov, THE THORNY WAY OF TRUTH, Part II;
Graz, Austria, 1984 (Advertisement in NATURE). (Claims free-
energy generator proved by DePalma, Newman)
[Martin, 1932] - Thomas Martin (ed), FARADAY'S DIARY, Bell, 1932,
in 5 vols. (Transcription and publication of Faraday's original
diaries)
[Nasar, 1970] - S. Nasar, ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES
& SYSTEMS, Prentice-Hall, 1970. (Discusses principles and
applications of acyclic (homopolar) machines)
Page 12
[Satellite News, 1981] - "Researchers see long-life satellite power
systems in 19th century experiment", Research news, SATELLITE
NEWS, 15 June 1981. (Reports DePalma's claim for free-energy
generator)
[Savage, 1949] - Norton Savage, letter re [Cohn, 1949a]; ELECTRICAL
ENGINEERING, July 1949, p645. (Claims error in Cohn's paper)
[Wilhelm, 1980] - Timothy J. Wilhelm, INVESTIGATIONS OF THE N-EFFECT
ONE-PIECE HOMOPOLAR DYNAMOS, ETC. (Phase I), Stelle, IL, 12 Sept
1980. (Discusses tests on DePalma's N-Machine)
[Wilhelm, 1981] - Timothy J. Wilhelm, INVESTIGATIONS OF THE N-EFFECT
ONE-PIECE HOMOPOLAR DYNAMOS, ETC. (Phase II), Stelle, IL, 10 June
1981. (Design and tests of improved homopolar generator/motor)
[Zeleny, 1924] - John Zeleny & Leigh Page, "Torque on a cylindrical
magnet through which a current is passing", PHYS. REV. v.24, 14
July 1924, p.544-59. (Theory and experiment on torque in a
homopolar device)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
(Sysop note: The following figure also had an accompanying drawing)
Figure 5 - Transcription of the first experiment showing generation
of electrical power in a moving conductor by Michael
Faraday
99*. Made many expts. with a copper revolving plate, about 12 inches
in diameter and about 1/5 of inch thick, mounted on a brass
axle.
To concentrate the polar action two small magnets 6 or 7 inches
long, about 1 inch wide and half an inch thick were put against
the front of the large poles, transverse to them and with their
flat sides against them, and the ends pushed forward until
sufficiently near; the bars were prevented from slipping down
by jars and shakes by means of string tied round them.
100. The edge of the plate was inserted more of less between the two
concentrated poles thus formed. It was also well amalgamated,
and then contact was made with this edge in different places by
conductors formed from equally thick copper plate and with the
extreme end edges grooved and amalgamated so as to fit on to
and have contact with the edges of the plate. Two of these
were attached to a piece of card board by thread at such
*[99]
(Sysop note: a sketch appeared in this area)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
(Sysop note: The following figure also had an accompanying drawing)
Figure 7 - Test of a rotating magnet by Michael Faraday, December
26, 1831.
255. A copper disc was cemented on the top of a cylinder magnet,
Page 13
paper intervening, the top being the marked pole; the magnet
supported so as to rotate by means of string, and the wires of
the galvanometer connected with the edge and the axis of the
copper plate. When the magnet and disc together rotated
unscrew the marked end of the needle went west. When the
magnet and disc rotated screw the marked end of the needle
went east.
256. This direction is the same as that which would have resulted
if the copper had moved and the magnet been still. Hence
moving the magnet causes no difference provided the copper
moves. A rotating and a stationary magnet cause the same
effect.
257. The disc was then loosed from the magnet and held still
whilst the magnet itself was revolved; but now no effect upon
the galvanometer. Hence it appears that, of the metal circuit
in which the current is to be formed, different parts must
move with different angular velocities. If with the same, no
current is produced, i.e. when both parts are external to the
magnet.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
(Sysop note: The following figure also had an accompanying drawing)
Figure 8 - Test data from report by Bruce DePalma
PERFORMANCE OF THE SUNBURST HOMOPOLAR GENERATOR
machine speed: 6000 r.p.m.
drive motor current no load 15 amperes
drive motor current increase
when N machine is loaded 1/2 ampere max.
Voltage output of N generator no load 1.5 volts d.c.
Voltage output of N generator loaded 1.05 v.d.c.
Current output of N generator 7200 amperes
(225 m.v. across shunt @ 50 m.v./1600 amp.)
Power output of N machine 7560 watts = 10.03 H.p.
Incremental power ratio = 7560/268 28.2 watts out/watts in
Internal resistance of generator 62.5 micro-phms
Reduction of the above data gives as the equivalent circuit for the
machine:
(Sysop note: a drawing R(internal) = 62.5 micro-ohms
appeared in this area) R(brush) = 114.25 " "
R(shunt) = 31.25 " "
BRUCE DEPALMA
17 DECEMBER 1980
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Page 14
Figure 15 - Summary of test results at 6500 rpm
I II III
MAGNET POWER OFF ON ON
OUTPUT SWITCH OPEN OPEN CLOSED
SPEED 6500 6500 6500 RPM
MAGNET CURRENT 0 16 16
AMPERES
MOTOR ARMATURE POWER 4782 5226 6028
WATTS
INCREMENT 444 802
WATTS
METER BRUSH VOLTAGE .005 1.231 1.070
VOLTS
OUTPUT CURRENT 0 0 4776
AMPERES
GENERATED VOLTAGE 1.280 (1.280)
VOLTS
GENERATED POWER 0 0 (6113)
WATTS
HOMOPOLAR GENERATOR TEST - BIG SPRINGS RANCH APRIL 26, 1986
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 15
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/dpalma6.asc
+198
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
December 16, 1990
DPALMA6.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXT FILE NOTES:
The following article on Tewari and DePalma was printed in a
magazine named "India Today" (December 31, 1987, page 102). Two
photos, one of Tewari and one of the SPG, accompanied the article.
The are no USA patents on the described technology. DePalma has
given it to the world as a gift. The source for this was "The
DePalma Research Papers", which was printed by For The People, P.O.
15999, Tampa, FL 33684.
If anyone is interested in other DePalma papers, call:
The Outer Limits BBS
300-2400 baud
(304) 327-7452
Monday-Friday
8:00am - 7:00pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY FROM SPACE
An Engineer's Invention Excites Interest
In a tiny room in a Bombay suburb, an electrical engineer works
on a machine that seems to have been conceived in a Sci-Fi book - a
generator which can ostensibly produce electricity from nothing.
But the machine's creator, Paramahamsa Tewari, 51, is not an
eccentric inventor from one of Sukumar Ray's fantastic tales. He is
a senior engineer with the Department of Atomic Energy's Nuclear
Power Corporation (NPC).
Tewari created a minor sensation 10 years ago when he produced the
theory that space is filled with a dynamic medium whose swirling
motion is the source of all matter and energy.
He called it the Space Vortex Theory (SVT) which postulated that at
the heart of the electron was a void whose high speed rotation
within a vacuum could produce energy from space.
Interestingly, it was the Theosophical Society which had first
published Tewari's theory by arranging a special lecture in 1977 at
Adyar in Madras.
Page 1
The theosophists were excited by Tewari's ideas since they were
remarkably close to observations about the electron put forward by
Annie Besant's associate, the clairvoyant Charles W. Leadbeater, in
the book "Occult Chemistry."
However, the first indication that Tewari's ideas about the
structure of space were more than just a mystic vision came earlier
this year at a conference in Hanover organised by the German
Association of Gravity Field Energy.
The Space Power Generator (SPG) invented by Tewari won the first
prize of Rs 25,000 from among 25 similar machines presented at the
conference by scientists from all over.
Tewari's generator is actually a simple machine, consisting
basically of a magnetised cylinder rotating at high speed with the
help of a motor.
Power from this device is extracted by connecting a wire between the
surface of the cylinder and its axis. According to the engineer-
inventor, the SPG produces two-and-a-half to three-and- a-half times
more power than it consumes, defying the basic physical law of
conservation of energy which says that the output of energy cannot
be more than the input.
Tewari says the excess power comes from the inter-atomic space of
the rotating cylinder - it is the movement of the "voids" in the
spinning cylinder which creates additional energy out of the space
between the machine's axis and the magnet.
Tewari admits that his theory sounds incredible taking into account
the existing laws and that he would never have developed it had he
been trained as a physicist and not an engineer, since it is so
divergent from conventional physics.
But, he says, it would have been difficult for him to go on with
work on the SVT and the generator were it not for encouragement from
two US physicists, John A. Wheeler, director of the Centre for
Theoretical Physics at the University of Texas, Austin, and Bruce
DePalma, formerly a lecturer in physics at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology.
"But for DePalma, I wouldn't have been able to tie up my theory,"
says Tewari. "He was working on similar ideas and kept sending his
results to me."
Though Tewari, who is slated for transfer to the NPC's Kaiga Project
in Karnataka as chief project engineer, has pursued his interest in
physics in his spare time, he has received infrastructural support
from the NPC for putting together his extraordinary new machine.
The SPG was built under Tewari's supervision at the Tarapur Atomic
Plant. "Tewari's prototype SPG can be considered a major
breakthrough," says S. L. Kati, managing director of NPC.
Before leaving for Hanover, Tewari addressed a meeting of scientists
and engineers at the Bhaba Atomic Research Centre on his theory.
But most physicists remained sceptical about his findings.
Page 2
Undaunted, he is experimenting with a new model of the SPG since his
return, which he feels will be an improvement. He eventually hopes
to create a prototype for a generator which could deliver 50 kw to
100 kw of electricity.
"The encouragement I received abroad has been a great help, and
hopefully within a year, I will be able to build an experimental
model which could ultimately prove commercially viable," he says.
Tewari, of course, is not the only engineer hoping to build the
ultimate power generation machine - one which will run perpetually
since it will extract energy from space - as the Hanover conference
demonstrated.
In fact, DePalma, the first inventor to create such a machine, is
presently conducting experiments in California in anticipation of a
breakthrough which could lead to commercial production.
Their work promises to create ultimately a machine which appears to
come straight out of a futuristic fantasy.
- M. Rahman
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/dpalma7.asc
+199
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
February 21, 1991
DPALMA7.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of
Andrew Mount and Bruce DePalma.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12 October 1989
An Introduction to Free Energy Physics
by Bruce DePalma
It should be appreciated here that the ideas which are presented are
coming from the mind of one man. The mind of this one man is
permeated by the sea of space, which is the repository of all
knowledge. What we see is what we get is the substance of this
essay.
Space, i.e. the vacuum, is filled with a sea of particles. I call
them Psions. The Psion flux is responsible for the Brownian motions
and "zero point energy" fluctuations. The isotropic Psion flux
moves at the speed of light. The Psions interact with matter only
slightly -- enough to cause Brownian motions and heat transfer.
The Psion as an elemental particle principle is not perfect, it
contains the defect of weight or mass which makes momentum transfer
possible. Its principle property is memory. That is, the Psion
remembers the material space it has just passed through, and retains
the impression for a given (quantized) relaxation time depending on
the strength of the impression.
Everyone is under the impression that antennas "radiate"
electromagnetic energy.
Consider the condition where the electrical excitation in the
conductors of the antenna is transported (at the speed of light, C)
to the observer by the Psion flux.
The energy absorbed by the hysteresis of space, (as Tesla observed
it), or the imperfection of the Psion interaction.
The Psion hypothesis offers two great advantages. The first is free
energy, and the second is the result of the wish of the desirer, the
formulator of the experiment.
Page 1
The first hypothesis of free energy is:
Energy is only created or destroyed, and
is not converted from one form to another.
If all the energy liberating processes of the material world are
considered as drawing their energy from the free energy field of
space, then the amount of work we expend in liberating this energy
becomes a result of the perfection of our ideas in the resolution of
an experiment, (i.e. the production of energy).
The electrical generator does not convert the mechanical input
to an electrical result.
The gasoline engine does not convert the latent heat of combustion
of the fuel to visible work energy. The fuel which is burned is the
result of the imperfection of the process for the recovery of
(energy in this manner) from space.
A perfect electrical generator would reflect understanding of the
material universe to the extent that an energy liberation process
could be materialized (i.e. constructed in material form), which
would not consume itself or alter as the result of the energy which
was being liberated (from the free energy substrate).
The proof of this idea resides in the N machine/Space Power
Generators being simultaneously developed in the U.S.A. and Indian
Nuclear Power Board Laboratories in Karwar, India.
The Psion is so named because it coincides with the intelligent part
of reality we call the mind. The mind is a result of it, and it is
the result of the mind. Descriptive reality can take us no further
than this.
The experimenter is the result of the experiment, is the final
result. Thus the wish or the desire of the experimenter is turned
into the result of his experiment.
A man detects particles or waves depending under which hypothesis he
is operating.
The impression of the light is brought to the experimenter by the
Psion flux, the result of his experiment is what he wants to detect.
If he wants particles he uses a photon detector, if he wants waves
he uses a diffraction grating. This explains all particle and
nuclear physics.
Man's role as creator can only be elaborated through resolution of
discipline and related forms. The result of the experiment is what
man wanted so he must perfect his own principles and resolve his
thought -- which is what we make into reality, Man and his machines.
I want to add a thought about quantization. States are
distinguished one from another by what I call the least
distinguishable thought. This is reflected in the decibel scale of
hearing, and the musical scales of notes.
After interaction with a material object the Psion retains an
impression which has a certain relaxation time. In general, the
Page 2
relaxation time must be long enough to satisfy terrestrial
measurements of the inverse square law; but for intergalactic
distances the quantum measurement effect of the least
distinguishable measurement would take place so that at a certain
distance, light would just fade out.
Thought and time will give many other attributes to the Psion
hypothesis. Has man reached his limit or not. Every theory is a
crutch to further-out places.
A possible thought: A free energy society could create anything it
wanted. There might be some point in the history of the future when
man might just forget himself -- and start over again.
Bruce DePalma
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3

bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/dpalma8.asc
+314
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : DPALMA8.ASC | Online Date : 10/31/95 |
| Contributed by : Andrew Mount | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
A very simple and cheap homopolar generator can be constructed using the
details of the file CLARK11, available freely from KeelyNet. We have two
KeelyNetters who report it works as described and we expect some data for
speed vs. output in the near future as more people experiment with this small
version. Bruce DePalma is currently living in Auckland, New Zealand as of
1995. Andrew Mount is DePalmas secretary and assistant.
The homopolar generator would be an ideal high current, low voltage source for
the production of Browns gas or hydrogen to run an engine or do welding in a
hybrid arrangement.
If you choose to experiment in these areas, please share your findings and
observations with KeelyNet........thanks!.......................>>> Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Released January 6, 1988
DePalma Energy Corporation,
1060 Channel Drive,
Santa Barbara, CA 93108
Two years ago the DePalma Energy Corporation initiated the construction of a
large N machine which was scaled from smaller machines which were used to
verify the validity of direct extraction of electrical energy from space or
the vacuum.
The N-1 machine was to produce a high enough output voltage so as to be
efficiently convertible to high voltage alternating current. Target
parameters for the machine were 12 v.d .c output at 10,000 amperes for a 6000
r.p.m. rotational speed.
The rotor is a key component of the N-1 generator, and into it goes most of
the time and effort in constructing the machine. Figure (1) shows the
completed rotor suspended from a crane. Two N-machines are connected
electrically in series on a common shaft. Magnetic polarity is NS-SN so that
rotation of the unit causes the voltages to be additive.
Electrical connections are made to the outer edges via liquid metal, metallic
mercury wetted contacts as shown in figure (2). Some of the considerations
incorporated into the design are: The idea of series, two machines on the
same shaft, is a good one because with magnetic polarity indicated only two
identical mercury contacts are needed.
The drawback is the necessity of separating the two N machines far enough from
each other so as to reduce the demagnetizing effect of one on the other. A
further simplification is the use of only two support bearings for two
machines, providing the center section can be made stiff enough to place
vibrational problems above the planned operating speed of the machine.
The 9-1/2 inch separation of the two magnet stacks resulted in a 20% reduction
in the field strength of the combination. Initial computer simulations of the
field strength inside 8-3/8 inch thick, 13 inch diameter magnet stacks of
NdFeB magnet material indicated 9000 gauss. Actual measurements gave only 3/4
of the expected figure, 6750 gauss.
Together with the 20% loss due to the proximity of the magnets the resultant
field strength is 5400 gauss in the center of the stacks. We have found some
relaxation in the strength of NdFeB magnets in open flux path operation even
when the diameter to thickness ratio is what would normally considered to be
a safe 2:1.
The achievement of a field strength of 6750 gauss uniformly distributed over a
diameter of a 13 inch circle with permanent magnets without a closed flux path
is impressive considering the size of the water cooled electromagnet needed to
produce the same result. Nevertheless it was felt that the flux inside the
machine could be increased by making the machine partially self-exciting.
This was accomplished by subdividing the 14 inch diameter by 3/8 inch thick
copper disc in the center of each magnet stack into two parallel windings of
two turns each. This is done in the manner of Tesla, (Reference 1).
Since the machine is operating on the slope of the demagnetization curve of
the magnets a small increment of magnetic induction will result in a
disproportionate increase of the magnetic flux of the magnets. With
sufficient current drawn from the machine the output impedance will decrease
and may become negative.
At present the measured internal resistance of the machine is 75 micro-ohms at
800 amperes and the voltage output is 1.216 volts per 1000 r.p.m. Mercury
contacts must be amalgamated by hand before assembly and seem to improve with
running time. Mercury builds a surface layer of oxide in contact with
atmospheric oxygen. Oxide sludge can be eliminated by operating the machine
in an inert helium atmosphere and hermetic sealing of the unit.
The N-1 generator incorporates both of these features which also prevent any
leakage of mercury or mercury vapor into the environment. The rotor is
constructed on a BeCu shaft 2 inches in diameter and 49 inches long. BeCu is
used for strength and good electrical conductivity.
The center section between the magnet stacks is stiffened by a 6 inch diameter
1/2 inch wall aluminum cylinder which encloses the central axle of 2 inch
diameter BeCu. The two central shafts are screwed together in a coupling
which when the magnet stacks are rotated one relative to the other, tightens
and places the aluminum cylinder in a state of compression. The stressed
center section is stiffer than if the connection was a solid 6 inch diameter
cylinder. All components are anodized and teflon coated so that electrical
conduction takes place along the designed path.
The magnet stacks themselves are constructed of 200 pieces each made from
NdFeB hexagons of dimension 2 inches (across the flats) by 1 inch thick, pre-
magnetized. Each magnet weighs about 1 pound. The magnets which repel each
other intensely are assembled and glued together with proprietary adhesives.
The assembled magnet stack is wound with 1/4 inch of graphite fiber roving
followed by 1/4 inch of epoxy-fibreglass. As constructed the rotor should be
capable of 10,000 r.p.m. without damage. Further development would result in
a rotor capable of standing 20,000 r.p.m. without flying apart. The mercury
contacts operate totally satisfactorily but are not entirely leakproof.
A small amount of mercury is lost in the operation of the machine which
amounts to about 1/2 c.c. per minute. A continuous flow system can be
provided to recycle and clean the mercury.
As can be seen from figure (2) the edge of the copper disc protrudes a
distance slightly less than 1/2 inch into a slightly larger channel cut into a
copper bussbar which encircles the magnet stack. The actual point of contact
with the mercury is made at a radius determined by exploration with a Hall
effect magnetometer. There is a point, somewhat above the surface of the
magnet stack where the fringing field produced by the presence of the copper
disc is exactly canceled by the flux linkages proceeding over the outer
surface of magnet from the north to south poles. Thus the mercury sliding
contact takes place in a region of zero flux.
The presence of strong magnetic flux around the rotor, and its considerable
weight, 800 lbs., make it a very difficult piece to handle mechanically. In
movement around a machine shop for the various operations, every motion must
be thought out carefully. After the work is finished all the tools have to be
demagnetized, including large lathes and milling machines.
These difficulties have to be counterbalanced by the easy accessibility of the
liquid metal sliding contacts and the higher voltages obtainable from the
large radius magnet stacks. Since voltage increases as the square of the
machine radius, the loss in flux from non-closure of the flux path is more
than compensated by the increased voltage output. i.e., if a 6 inch diameter
central axle in a closed path machine were operated at say 2 x 6750 gauss or
13.5 KG then the voltage obtained would be only 1/2 of what would be gotten
with half the flux (6750 gauss) at twice the radius (12 inches).
The other overriding consideration is that no closed flux path is possible in
a machine operating with super-conducting magnets since the attainable
magnetic strength, 90 KG, will saturate known magnetic conductors. Figure (3)
shows the partially assembled machine, figure (4) shows the completed N-1
machine under test.
A loadbank capable of absorbing 100 KW @12 v.d.c. is in the background. Tests
are preliminary for two reasons. Firstly we are operating at only a small
fraction of power output for which the machine is capable, and second it is
only possible to estimate the electro-mechanical efficiency of the drive
motor.
A second more definitive round of testing will take place when we have
installed an in-line direct torque sensor between the drive motor and the N-1
generator. The exact comparisons can be made between direct horsepower
mechanical input and the electrical output.
Electrical testing of motors and generators is a carefully specified procedure
and has been followed in accord with well established engineering practice.
The results will be presented here.
Reference to the testing of d.c. machines: "Principles of Direct-Current
Machines", Alexander S. Langsdorf, M.M.E., 5th ed., McGraw-Hill Book
Co., Inc., 1940.
The drive motor used for our experiments is a d.c. machine originally used to
supply a constant 30 v.d.c. at up to 500 amperes in aircraft service during
W.W. II.
Operating speed was 4000-8000 r.p.m. and output voltage was regulated by
control of the field excitation, nominally 24 v.d.c. @ 12 amps.
The machine has six poles and six interpoles excited by a combination of
armature and field currents. The voltage picked off the commutator by six
sets of brushes passes through the interpole winding which adds 1/2 v.d.c.
drop for each 100 amperes of armature current. The interpoles are used to
prevent commutation losses in electrical machines operated at high speed.
The presence of the interpoles reduces the size of main poles by about 30%
with a consequent loss in efficiency. The complete subject is dealt with in a
Langsdorf's book. In addition to the IR drop in the interpole winding there
is a one volt drop assigned to each carbon brush in accord with AIEE
procedures.
Electromechanical efficiency of d.c. machines studied hits a maximum of about
85% in the center of the operating range. Efficiency falls rapidly at low
speeds and decreases much less rapidly at speeds above the maximum efficiency
point. (See Langsdorf p. 525)
The average of five runs on January 5, 1988 are presented. Three of the runs
were at no load condition and two were under load. Operating speed for all
tests was exactly 2600 rpm. Measurements were very consistent differing 1-2%
from run to run.
machine speed : 2600 r.p.m.
internal resistance @ 800
amps : 75 micro-ohms
load resistance : .003875 ohms
volts/1000 r.p.m.: 1.216
Derived calculations, two loaded runs, three unloaded runs.
motor power input loaded: 5030 watts
unloaded : 2383
N-1 electrical output : 2480
(1) straight electrical efficiency (no corrections) = 93.8%
(2) electrical efficiency corr. for brush and interpole winding drop =
108.5%
(3) electrical eff. corrected assuming motor electromagnetic efficiency .8 =
136%
(4) efficiency assuming motor eff. of .4 = 271%
[note: What is being measured is electrical efficiency. Examination of the
figures shows loaded input is supplying electrical output and no-load
mechanical losses (expressed electrically). On this basis a corrected
loaded input (case 2) of 4440 watts expresses a no-load mechanical loss
of 2155 watts and an electrical output of 2480 watts (simultaneously).
This gives an overall energy balance of 4440 watts input giving rise to 4635
watts total output (sum of elec. and mech.). This expresses an overall
efficiency for the N-1 unit of 104.5%. Without corrections for motor
efficiency 195 extra watts have been extracted from space.]
Set of assumptions (4) seems most likely since this figure falls into line
with the average of power ratios reported for N machines by Trombly (4.92),
Tewari (1.75 - 2.50), DePalma (original Sunburst machine 2.5 - 3), Kincheloe
(improved Sunburst 4.9).
For the calculations made on the DePalma Energy N-1 unit for the five runs
averaged the loaded drive motor current ranged from 194 to 197 amps. Drive
motor voltage ranged from 25.5 to 26 volts respectively.
Unloaded drive motor current ranged from 89.5 to 96 amps voltage from 25.4 to
25.8 volts. Loaded current output was 800 amps. @ 3.1 v.d.c.
Unloaded d.c. output voltage ranged from 3.1 to 3.22, avg. 3.16. All readings
taken at constant speed of 2600 r.p.m.
Change in loading on the drive motor only changes armature current, armature
voltage remains essentially constant.
The next phase of measurements will refine the efficiency determination by a
direct measurement of generator driving torque x r.p.m. from an in-line
torque sensor. This installation will take some time however it was felt
useful to put out an initial report since the reported results are consistent
with the findings of other investigators.
Many workers are attempting to construct a self-running motor generator
combination operating on the principle of direct extraction of electrical
energy from space. The presently used combination uses a Faraday disc motor
excited from an N machine mounted on a common shaft.
Even if the electro-mechanical efficiency of the Faraday disc is state of the
art 96% the losses in the system may make it difficult to get the loop gain
over 100%. N machine output increases as the square of the voltage or speed
but mechanical losses consist of constant factors which are speed invariant
and mechanical N machine output must be high enough to overshadow all the
constant and speed variable losses.
Examination and digestion of the parameters and figures shows it may be
necessary to have electrical output of the N machine in the 30 - 40 kilowatt
range before a Faraday disc N machine combination could self-sustain. A d.c.
machine such as we are using for a drive motor has too many losses to be
considered for a self-running combination.
The self-running combination will probably require a drive motor with reduced
back e.m.f. compared to the Faraday disc with the same mechanical output. For
some years I have been advocating the use of a motor with such
characteristics. This is covered in reference (2).
A permanent magnet version of this machine has been built which operates and
shows interesting characteristics. Back e.m.f. is generated in the Boning
motor from the N effect voltage generated in the central axle which is both
magnetized and rotating. This voltage subtracts from the applied voltage
which is causing the motor to rotate.
As can be appreciated from the geometry of the situation this back e.m.f. can
be made 25% of that which would exist if a Faraday disc were used to the same
diameter as the Boning spiral in an inside out Faraday disc motor. It is
clear that if a principle of energy extraction is operative as an electrical
generator, that same principle could be applied in the form of an electrical
motor with reduced back e.m.f.
The object to develop an N machine electrical generator of high power
capability and useful voltage output has been realized with the N-1 unit.
Further measurements will refine the understanding of this. Exact torque
measurement will remove uncertainties from the exact power gain of this unit.
Future work on the rotor will attempt to achieve high dynamic balance so the
unit can be run at a designed speed without excessive vibration. Research on
the self-running machine will continue with the study and further construction
of the Boning motor. As work continues additional reports will be issued.
The N-1 rotor unit is a manufactured item and is available from the DePalma
Energy Corporation.
Bruce E. DePalma,
6 January 1988,
Santa Barbara, California
(1) Nikola Tesla; The Electrical Engineer, N.Y., Sept 2, 1891. Published by
Nikola Tesla Museum, Beograd, Yugoslavia, 1956.
(2) Wireless Engineer, November 1952, Vol. 29, No. 350.
(3) by Paramahamsa Tewari, Dept. of Atomic Energy, Nuclear Power Board,
Bombay, India. A high quality videotape documenting the experiments
described in the paper will be available from DePalma Energy Corporation.
Format NTSC or PAL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/dpalma9.asc
+133
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : DPALMA9.ASC | Online Date : 10/31/95 |
| Contributed by : Tom Brown | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
If you might wish to experiment with a small desktop version of a simple, easy
to build homopolar generator, download CLARK11, freely available on KeelyNet.
The following commentary was written by Bruce DePalma and shared with KeelyNet
courtesy of Tom Brown, Executive Editor of Borderlands. Tom tells me he has
been in active dialogue with Bruce DePalma and is impressed with the man's
integrity........................................................>>> Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A review of: "The Homopolar Handbook", by Thomas Valone, self published,
Integrity Institute, 1377 K Street NW, suite 204, Washington D.C. 20005; 1994
by Bruce DePalma
Auckland, New Zealand
2 February 1995
Recently a copy of Valone's Homopolar Handbook was sent to me for review.
Because Valone's book represents so well what is wrong with America and why
America has become a third rate scientific power, it is worthy of comment.
Comments about a first rate, world class, scientific invention often reveal
much more about the critics than they do about the invention. In the argot of
contemporary language Thomas Valone could be summed up as a science groupie
wherein the admonition, "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing" finds
realization.
We are ingratiated into his presence by his easy familiarity with Bruce, Adam,
Tim, and George. His presence in the formative days of the free energy
revolution is chronicled.
With the insight and perspicacity of an experienced name dropper, junior
college instructor, and scientific dilettante he presents a carefully selected
panoply of l9th and early 20th century scientific writings concerning unipolar
induction.
Although he does admit there are ambiguous and unexplained phenomena of
electricity production and torque reaction in the homopolar machine "his"
experiments suggest the efficiency of energy generation in the N-machine /
S.P.G. can never exceed 100%.
Without understanding and familiarity with unipolar induction many of his
readers would be impressed with his and his professors ignorance of the basic
phenomena of electromagnetism.
But the greatest error of all is his presumption that if "he" cannot reproduce
the experiments of DePalma, Trombly and Tewari then the experiments are at
fault. With this he joins the ranks of those who "proved" man cannot exceed
15 m.p.h., heavier than air machines cannot fly, electricity cannot be
transmitted down wires, and free energy is impossible.
The costing programs of Trombly and Mitchell are carefully recorded connoting
Valone's true fascination with money. The monstrous contraption of Parker
Kinetic Designs, a child of the greed induced collaboration of Richard
Marshall and William Weldon, presided over by Herb Woodson, formerly of the
D.C. White-Woodson "Energy Laboratory" of M.I.T., appears on the cover of his
tract.
Because the phenomena of unipolar induction are so fundamental to electrical
science and the benefits of a change in the paradigm of electrical power
generation are so incredible, one can view the reaction to the N-machine /
S.P.G. and its technology as an indictment of America and American science
rather than as an affront to the workers who are bringing this technology into
existence.
Valone derives his supercilious kicks from deriding Adam Trombly, who, because
he has been gagged by the DoD and had his experimental setup confiscated,
cannot defend himself.
The management of America, the lawyers and politicians, have finally resorted
to confiscation of patents in the name of national security.
You will note the "Fara-Drum" is part of a weapons system to propel
projectiles at velocities greater than achievable with chemically powered
cannons. No thought is given to energy applications of a life supporting
nature designed to reduce the cost of electricity for the general public.
No first rate, world class scientist would have anything to do with a system
of secrecy and intimidation funded at the trough of U.S. government supported
"scientific" research. The Fara-Drum will go the way of the Super-Collider
while the mountain of public debt grows ever higher.
If I felt that the introduction of a new form of energy extraction into the
world were simply a matter of convincing or the winning of scientific
arguments then I might be inclined to refute point by point.
Suffice it to say that Valone omits in his report two seminal papers:
The Kincheloe Report, "Homopolar 'Free Energy' Generator Test",
presented at the 1986 meeting of the Society for Scientific Exploration,
San Francisco; (see DPALMA5.ASC on KeelyNet)
and DePalma's: "On the Possibility of Extraction of Electrical Energy
Directly from Space", Speculations in Science and Technology, Vol. 13, No.
4, page 283, 1990. (see DPALMA1.ASC on KeelyNet)
Professor Kincheloe's report is possibly the most carefully analyzed report on
an N-machine presently in general circulation. It concludes N-machine drag is
13% - 20% of what would be measured on a conventional induction generator
delivering the same amount of power.
The rationale of Valone and his ilk is that they are providing a service to
humanity by ferreting out the "truth". What results is the duplicitous serving
of a crypto-technical state whose intentions are a new world order where the
ends justify the means. The debt ridden state of America trembles at the
thought of technical innovation in energy generation.
Eighty to ninety percent of the cost of energy is required to service the debt
of the utilities incurred in the era of atomic energy and to maintain the
salaries of the executives and meter readers, not to speak of the maintenance
of long distance power lines.
A more local energy system based on direct extraction of energy from space,
without burning or consumption of fuel would delight the populace. Capital
would desert the present monstrous complex of environmentally destructive
atomic and coal fired boilers and turbines. The Fara-Drum monstrosity speaks
to the arid world of a technically controlled society ruled by the gun of
conservation, read corruption.
In a world which has passed beyond the gentlemanly dialogues and colloquia of
the 19th and early 20th century is it not clear to be seen in the rising
waters, earthquakes, fires, and plagues upon mankind, God's answer to the
acolytes and servitors of greed and ego.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/dualvelo.asc
+134
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : DUALVELO.ASC | Online Date : 05/09/95 |
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| WWW sites - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb & http://www.protree.com |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following hints at an unusual relativity theory which might have
'alternative' applications.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.philosophy.objectivism,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,
sci.edu,sci.energy,sci.engr,sci.logic,sci.misc,sci.physics,sci.
physics.computational.fluid-dynamics,sci.physics.electromag,sci.
physics.fusion,sci.physics.particle,sci.research
Path: news.cc.uch.gr!news.forth.gr!ecrc!Munich.Germany.EU.net!Germany.EU.net!
EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!vergon
From: vergon@netcom.com (Vertner Vergon)
Subject: Re: The Farce of Physics
Message-ID: <vergonD5HGDs.n11@netcom.com>
Sender: vergon@netcom19.netcom.com
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <3jgamd$op0@acasun.eckerd.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 13:05:51 GMT
Lines: 100
Xref: news.cc.uch.gr alt.philosophy.objectivism:4693 alt.sci.physics.new-
theories:3257 sci.astro:58753 sci.edu:5093 sci.energy:23692 sci.engr:6106
sci.logic:7265 sci.misc:6052 sci.physics:76412
sci.physics.computational.fluid-dynamics:462 sci.physics
.electromag:1360 sci.physics.fusion:13797 sci.physics.particle:829
sci.research:4892
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
Keywords:
Cc:
In article <3jgamd$op0@acasun.eckerd.edu>,
Bryan Wallace <wallace@acasun.eckerd.edu> wrote:
>
>This post is in reply to the Steve Carlip carlip@dirac.ucdavis.edu 27 Feb
1995
>18:40:02 post in the Thread "The Farce of Physics" in the newsgroup
>"sci.physics".
>
>Steve wrote:
>
>> ... In other words, we may not be able to compute the exact
>>trajectory of a falling apple, but we can calculate the tension in the
>>stem that holds it to the tree. ...
>
>Most physicists would argue that Einstein's General Relativity theory is
>superior to Newtonian theory, yet it can't compute the trajectory of a
>falling apple or the orbit of a spacecraft in the solar system and Newtonian
>theory can. S. Chandrasekhar in his article titled "Einstein and general
>relativity: Historical perspectives" (Am.J.Phys.,47(3),212-1979), wrote:
>
> ... On this account, it would have been entirely sufficient to generalize
> the Newtonian theory to allow for such small departures which may arise
> from the finiteness of the velocity of light since we expect the Newtonian
> theory to be exact if the velocity of light could be considered as
> infinite. ...
>
>R. A. Waldron in his article titled "Gravitational forces"(Speculations Sci.
>Technol.,7,177-1984) wrote:
>
> That the anomaly in the precession of the planet Mercury could be
> accounted for by a modification to Newton's law of gravitation has been
> known for a long time. Einstein's general theory of relativity can, in
> this respect, be expressed as a factor [1 + (3v^2/c^2)] in the
> gravitational force law [22]. ...
This is an interesting thread -- with an interesting twist.
I published a book in 1976 [ modestly :-) ] entitled Relativity Beyond
Einstein that contained my Dual Velocity Theory of Relativity.
In it I maintained that a better relativity theory could be had by
generalizing Newtonian mechanics (I termed it "creating a bridge between NM
and relativistic mechanics").
Actually, in the beginning, I thought I was going to come up with something
very different than Einstein's SR. As things went along I began to see that I
was developing a parallel theory. Certain reviewers were telling me that I was
saying the same thing in a different way.
But when I finished there were certain differences. For example, in SR we have
the concept of "relativistic mass" that creates quite a bit of controversy and
"un-understanding" -- or *mis*understanding if you please, to wit:
Momentum is given as P = gamma m, which is often written
mv
P = ----
R
(R = Lorentz transformation)
It is always assumed that R modifies m, creating the unexplainable -- often
causing problems -- 'relativistic mass'.
As an inherent part of my theory R modifies v (velocity), not m (mass). This
gives us an INVARIANT mass.
But what about the velocity? It is measured as v. The theory is based on
Newtonian velocites with infinity as a limit -- BUT there are *two* velocites,
the c+ velocity is foreshortened in observation and is measured as v.
There is a *mechanical* explanation for this phenomenon.
The theory also reveals a differing Doppler effect (see posting this
newsgroup), a differing addition of velocities (also in this newsgroup) and a
differing rate for time dilation (and compression). The latter dissipates the
twins paradox.
I could go on -- but then I'd be long winded. Just wanted to get my 2 cents in
here.
For a better world V.V. Model Maker
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making
them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new
generation grows up that is familiar with it.
--- Max Planck
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.
--- Einstein
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vanguard Note - Looking for more details on this theory. How intriguing,
that mass does not change, just the speed at which the mass is moving, kind of
a turbo boost once the Lorentz transformation kicks in. Could this be a key
to how to generate the 'wormholes' so prevalent in sci-fi media today?..Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/edwards.asc
+365
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,365 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : EDWARDS.ASC | Online Date : 05/07/95 |
| Contributed by : InterNet | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| Web sites - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb & http://www.protree.com |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following document involves tapping the Earth as a magnetic field electron
accelerator. Related devices include Perrigo, Prentice, Jefimenko and others.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electricity out of thin air
One person's research which supports the MRA hypothesis
by Richard A. Edwards - Australia
Several decades ago a man took a bucketful of ilmenite, or similar, melted and
compressed it into a solid block of monocrystal siliconand and sliced the
block into wafers. The wafers were square. Today they are square, round or
any desired shape. Recent breakthroughs in solar-electric technology have even
allowed the silicon to be completely flexible.
On his workbench he placed a stack of the wafers and a sheet of glass (today,
plastic is more commonly used). On each wafer he glued an aluminium
conducting grid, leaving a trail north and south. He turned each wafer over,
gluing them on the glass so that the conducting grid was between the glass and
the wafers in, say, rows of six.
He solder-connected all the north tails to the south tails, making a
continuous conducting grid. Over the lot he glued a laminate to weatherproof
it and hold it all together. On one of the remaining two tails he connected a
diode to give (polarized) directed flow. He took the assembled panel out into
the sunlight. He turned it over so that the glass was nearest the light, then
the conducting grid, then the silicon.
He connected the two tails to a battery and two meters - one to measure
voltage, the other to measure amperage. The meters began to register a flow
of electricity. His theory was no longer a theory. Thus was born solar-to-
electric conversion of energy, used and known throughout the world today as
the photovoltaic effect.
You can see the evolution of the process on site and for sale in shops all
around you today.
PHOTOVOLTAIC EFFECT
At its birth the photovoltaic man-made effect was hailed as the saviour of
mankind. Limitless energy to herald a utopian future? No. It slowly and
painfully became clear that this new energy source was far too meagre and had
very limited application, though some diehards still doggedly assure the
public that it is the energy source of the future.
I have spent some ten years researching and developing my concept of the
energy source of the future. I offer it herewith. The photovoltaic effect
described above is man imitating and greatly improving upon nature.
I firmly believe that man cannot do anything in the realm of physics if nature
has not already done it. He just does it better mostly, and occasionally
worse. That photovoltaic effect happens all over the world wherever and
whenever the Sun shines. All the surface of the Earth that is not biological
(alive or dead), water or mineral; is silicon - all the rock of the Earth,
from mountains to hills, boulders to rocks, stones to pebbles, from sand to
dust.
All that silicon, plus most minerals, contribute free electrons into the air
by the Sun's photovoltaic effect, in much less per-area quantity than the
concentration in a man-made panel but in an immensely larger world-sized
conglomerate.
My concept was and still is simplicity itself. We have to learn how to harvest
those free electrons that fill the air all around us. Before I start
experimenting with hardware, I had to think it fully through. That took me
several years. Here is that Big Think in summary.
That infinite source of free electrons must be the major source of natural
electricity on Earth, from its obvious manifestation in lightning to its
unseeable but measurable vastness in the ionosphere. I do not wish to lock
horns with scientists who might hold an image of the ionosphere's shape and
structure different from mine.
I will just report my hardware observations and inescapable conclusions -
not necessarily in that order. The ionosphere and the weather system together
constitute to the Earth what storage is in a man-made battery. The charging
is infinite. Literally infinite. The Sun shines on the Earth. The natural
photovoltaic effect produces limitless, probably immeasurable amounts of free
electrons.
Those free electrons - ions if you like, same thing - cannot travel of their
own volition. They are subject to gravity, any local electromagnetic
phenomenon, wind, and most importantly, the Earth's rotation.
The Earth rotates, taking the day's makings into the night side. The effect
at night of the ionosphere - it's very presence, even - is well-documented and
gratingly evident to receivers of any EMF wave, particularly in AM mode. That
is the primary storage we are after, plus its storage in the weather system.
We can, according to my big think, take out more of that electricity than we
can ever use, without in any way upsetting the balance of nature. The shape of
the ionosphere, as my hardware experiments mapped it and so will yours, can
only be more or less like a surfer's wet hair - long and trailing at the back.
The dawn side.
If it weren't trailing - the excess being drawn off by gravity into the Sun -
the electrical charge on Earth would just keep building and life as we know it
could never have begun on Earth. In a nutshell, the solar system is a dynamo
powered by the Sun. The Earth is an electricity storage battery. All we have
to do to give ourselves Energy Utopia is to cream off as much of that
electricity as we care to take before it trails off into the Sun.
That finished my Big Think. Righto. Anybody can theorise about anything.
Hardware is what counts. So I began the practical bit. It has taken me four
years and I have gone as far as I can go. Here is the summary.
THE HARDWARE
First I needed an upside-down, naked photovoltaic panel. The silicon and
conducting grid had to be in unimpeded, open contact with the air. The normal
method of manufacture described above only harvests the tiny amount of
electrons freed within. According to my big think, a naked upside-down job
would harvest not only that tiny amount but also the free electrons naturally
filling the air. Okay.
Whipped around the solar shops and factories in my home town, Perth and Sydney
to find someone to make it. Didn't have to. Found one ready to roll - BP Solar
Supplies sell it. It's the size of an A5 page. The model number is GM684-
SP60-12v. It is not a BP product. It states "Made in Hong Kong" - nothing
else. Shy manufacturer.
Not to worry. BP Solar Supplies sell it, their shops are all around Australia.
The panel cost AUD $49 full retail. I will be quoting costs from now on
because the whole idea of this report is for you to take up where I left off.
The total cost is tiny. I am not pursuing any intellectual property protection
of any kind. I believe I might, just might, have discovered Energy Utopia. I
further believe that my discoveries must be worked up and brought on line as
quickly as possible as the world is in imminent danger of suffocating in a
poisonous cloud of environmental filth spewed from our vehicle exhausts and
factory chimneys.
Any and all of you - backyard enthusiasts, R&D scientists, schoolchildren and
their teachers - can circumvent that. Anybody. Anywhere. Except me. I
cannot - you can. Help yourself. Don't do as I say - do as I did.
The panel: you can see at a glance how to strip it naked.
Unscrew the plastic case.
Cut the binding glue off all the edges.
Slide the panel out.
Slip a Stanley or similar knife blade under a corner of the laminate, lifting
an edge.
Peel the laminate off, just a bit harder than peeling an onion.
That's all there is to it. There is no other panel known to me with which you
can do that. All larger models are made as described above - impossible to
separate the plastic from the works. All the smaller models I have seen are
lacquered, not laminated, and equally useless for our purpose.
I am now going to report my discoveries with hardware during the past four
years. Except for the panel, your equipment will possibly be different from
mine, and your environment fluctuation certainly will be. You can form your
own theoretical conclusions.
Have your own bit of a think. I will not be referring to my big think again,
except to state now that during it I theorised that the Earth's magnetic
field might play a major role; perhaps the electricity harvest can be
accelerated. I was to be proven right.
In my backyard patio I set to work. The patio was ideal, being open on three
sides. Full free-flow air contact. From Dick Smith's I bought a digital
multimeter, model number Q-1420. You can pick it out on the shelf easily.
It's bright yellow. It will be helpful for you to get one of that model
yourself. It's very cheap - only AUD $29. More importantly it is dual purpose,
unlike all other multimeters that I have seen. You only have to twiddle the
dial to switch between amps and volts. You don't have to unplug, replug,
disconnect, reconnect or worry about series or parallel.
Give analog meters a miss. A needle is nowhere near as clear as LCD numbers.
I place the naked panel, the multimeter and a 12 volt battery on a table and
connected them in simple series. Note: your battery must be in good condition
but never full or you will have nowhere for the electricity to go, and
therefore amps won't register on the meter.
(we have been informed by Sonne Ward, that the Optima batteries can be used as
extremely high density capacitors to accumulate high voltage spikes to
appreciable powers because of the capacitor like construction, check out Bruce
Melands 'Electrifying Times', 63600 Deschutes Market Road, Bend, OR 97701, 1
year subscription for $10, go for it.....KeelyNet/Jerry)
It's exactly the same as when you turn on a hot water tap in your house. Water
runs out of the tank. Water runs into the tank, registering on your front
yard meter, and water runs out of the dam miles away.
The only difference in this case is that the dam is not miles away. We are
surrounded by it - a vast ocean of electricity in which the Earth continually
floats. Being aware that any light, natural or artificial, produces the
photovoltaic effect, I decided to use a flourescent tube as the light source.
It is well documented that flourescence is better than incandescence - your
every day light bulb - for the former is a diffuse light source, while the
latter is focal. For about AUD $20 I bought one of those standard 12 volt
car trouble lights available in auto accessories shops, service stations and
variety stores everywhere.
I removed the plastic lid (it just clips off), turned the light upside down
and positioned it over the panel, setting it permanently in position simply by
resting it on a cigarette packet-sized bit of wood each end. The light would
now bathe the naked panel. I connected the light to the battery in a
different, separate circuit.
TAPPING THE EARTH'S FREE ELECTRICITY
Now, the Earth's magnetic field. From Tandy's I had bought a roll of aluminium
conducting ribbon as used in window burglar alarms. It cost about AUD$7.
Around the cardboard packet the solar panel came in, I wound some of the
ribbon, securing it here and there with sticky tape, to make a flat coil.
To each end of the ribbon I connected about three metres of plastic-covered
wire flex. We will come back to that shortly. I connected the flat coil
between the naked panel and the multimeter.
Is that all clear to you? A simple series.
Battery to naked panel to flat coil to multimeter to battery. Flourescent
light source in a separate circuit. Diagrams are not necessary. Once you
have the hardware in front of you, it will become stunningly simple.
All systems go. At about 3.00 pm one afternoon three years ago I setup the
rig. My wife, our four kids and I, feeling pretty silly, sat to wait and see
what, if anything, would happen.
The volts read about 2 volts. The amps read about 2 milliamps. Nothing by 4.00
pm. Still the same. I put on a pair of insulating washing-up gloves to make
sure the electricity in my body would not be a factor. I picked up the flat
coil. I moved it about in all planes.
Up. Down, Sideways. Twist. WOW! Volts and amps rose and dived all over the
place. I satisfied myself that I had found the highest orientation reading -
about 3.5 volts and about 5 milliamps - then propped the coil permanently in
that position on the table simply by jamming it between books.
The sun set about 7.00 pm. About 8.00 pm, volts and amps began to rise. By
9.00 pm they had reached about 5 volts and 10 milliamps. They stayed there
until about an hour before dawn. Then they dropped back to 3 volts and 5
milliamps.
My family and I were stunned. Far better than I had dreamed! Many nights of
monitoring and analysing have since revealed various times of increase.
Sometimes before sunset, sometimes hours after. My house is near the ocean.
Sometimes the wind would be offshore, sometimes onshore. You can form your own
conclusions. I have formed mine.
On rare occasions a strange thing happened. During crystal-clear weather, day
or night but much more noticeable at night, the volts and amps would swiftly
fall, staying down for varying periods from a few minutes up to an hour or so,
then swiftly rise again. There was no tangible variable in the environment.
My family and I were most perplexed. One midnight the volts and amps were at
the lowest reading we had seen at any time of day or night. That was when I
noticed the Moon was full and directly overhead. I have formed my conclusions.
You can form yours.
But the party had not yet warmed up. The summer electrical storm season was
due to begin. That's what I wanted to see. During the ensuing two years of
monitoring and analysing, we had many electrical storms. This is briefly
what happened.
When rain fell, day or night, volts and amps immediately leapt, sometimes
trebling from whatever they were reading, and stayed up until at least ten
minutes after the rain had stopped. When a nearby lightning flash occurred,
volts and amps went too high and fluctuated so wildly that it was and still is
difficult to comprehend the enormity of what we were seeing.
But the party had still not yet got hot. So far the hardware was only
stationary. What would happen if it were moving? Would it harvest more free
electrons like a baleen whale harvests plankton while cruising through the
ocean with its mouth open? Let's find out.
I rang an energy management consultancy in Perth which I selected from the
yellow pages on the basis that it was in the CBD, thus accessible to me by
public transport. I am a virtually penniless invalid pensioner so I have to do
everything in the cheapest possible way. I gave them a verbal rundown. They
arranged an appointment at their office for two days later.
I bought another new GM684-SP60-12v and took it to the office. I did nothing.
I touched nothing. I just talked. They stripped the panel naked, connected it
to a meter on volts and another meter on amps, put a D battery in the circuit
(connected to and operating a transistor radio to keep it less than full, I
guess, though I must admit I couldn't follow half of what they were doing -
they are scientists), placed the lot in the sun and notated the readings: 2.8
volts, and I didn't catch the amps.
Them young whippersnappers were going too fast for this old cougar. We all
boarded one of their cars and went driving along a freeway. One of the
scientists held the naked panel out the passenger window in the sun. The rest
of the equipment was inside. As the car accelerated to the speed limit, the
volts climbed to 8 volts and the amps likewise trebled. I will resist the
temptation to tart up this report with their superlatives. You can use your
imagination.
I thanked for their help, left and have not seen them since to have a good
yarn, though we keep in touch. I will not name them. This whole report might
turn out to be a fizzer and they have their hard-earned reputations. I don't
have that problem.
The only problem I have is to make this report as clear as I possibly can so
you can take over. I then figured out that a multidirectional coil might be
the best way to go for the Earth's magnetic field electron accelerator.
It struck me that a vehicle powered by the work-up from the knowledge base I
had so far gathered, or an electric train, trolley bus or other public
transport electric vehicle harvesting by hardware on top and feeding the
harvest into the existing electricity distribution grid, would of course be
continually changing direction and the flat coil wouldn't be correctly
orientated except now and then.
I bought two aluminium rods, 1m x 5mm x 2mm, costing $5. I wound them around a
bottle to make two coils the shape of a small barrel-loaf of bread. I attached
them at right angles to each other on a small plank and nailed two pieces of
wood to the underside of the plank.
Thus I made a slot between so the rig would sit on the passenger window of
my car. When I wound the window up, the rig jammed in position like one of
those indicator arms on the old car I used to drive in my youth. I connected
a diode to one end. A packet of 10 cost me about $2 at Tandy's. Next, I
connected the two coils together with a bit of flexwire.
Then I hung the yellow multimeter on the passenger side interior sunvisor
where I could easily see it while driving. I connected from the car battery
to the multimeter to the double coil back to the battery.
Parking the car in my driveway so the passenger side was in the sun, I took
the rig off the window and moved it around to find the lowest reading - about
8 millivolts. Didn't bother amps (wouldn't be any). Just a simple direction
test. I stood in front of the rig to block out the sun. About 4 millivolts
- heat factor established. To eliminate extraneous factors of power lines,
media transmissions et al, I drove into the middle of several school playing
fields, several miles apart, taking a couple of my sons with me in case these
tired old eyes deceived themselves.
Driving around in circles, the volts climbed astonishingly in some directions
and dived equally startingly in others. I found the highest reading to be in a
generally southern orientation, moving or stationery.
The volts read 180 millivolts - an increase in percentage too mind-boggling
for me to say more. I have tried to make this report as accurate as I can but
I'm only human, just as fallible as you. I've figured it out as best I can.
I can offer no qualifications - I left school as a scholastic disaster when I
turned 15 more than 40 years ago and have had no schooling since. Magazine
readerland is choc-a-bloc with minds much better than mine.
If you see hope in it, if you think it might be something more than the dreams
of a bored, stiff old bludger and want to investigate it further in a proper
scientific manner, fine. It's all yours. I seek no money and less fame.
I couldn't proceed any further if the world gave me a blank cheque, the best
electronic laboratory on the planet and the finest scientific minds to help
me. I believe those things are you. I can be contacted via mail addressed to
me (Richard Edwards) at Nexus Magazine, P.O. Box 30, Mapleton, QLD 4560.
(Is this not a wonderfully advanced attitude for people to have, I definitely
plan to write this fellow and provide him with some additional related
information for his benefit....thank you Mr. Edward!....>>> Jerry/KeelyNet)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/ees.asc
+132
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 30, 1993
EES.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Bill Donavan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Emerging Energy Science
+ D A T A B A S E +
The National Research Council of Canada demanded:
Examine and describe the theory, rationale, research, experiments
and devices -- whether theoretical or actual -- of what might become
future energy science and technology.
More than 300 researchers in the Planetary Association for Clean
Energy's International collaborative scientific network responded.
The exercise has grown into an electronic database. Included are
verified items from English, French, German, Russian, Italian,
Spanish and Japanese sources --all in a classified format for easy
sifting of useful information.
In updates, included will be key documents of latest world
developments in this domain -- all edited from an independent and
advanced scientific perspective.
Features
References are given by author, title, bibliographic details,
specially edited annotation of content, interpretive commentary and
by descriptors derived from a list of over several hundred.
Searches can be made by record number and by title; through
annotations and commentary (up to 16 kb text) ; by descriptor tags;
and, finally, by first letter of author or title. It is also
possible to sift files.
Updates on quarterly and annual basis.
Requirements: Mac Version
Mac Plus or higher with 10 MB Hard disk space available. With
system 7.0, 4 MB RAM available. Mouse, 3 1/2Ó disk drive,
HyperCard 2.0.
Requirements: PC Version
IBM compatible 286, 386, 486, PS/2, VGA/SVGA card and monitor;
mouse; 3 1/2" or 5 1/4" disk drive (HD); Hard disk with 2 MB
Page 1
available (with potential to store another 10MB within next 2 years
for this Database +; Windows 3.0 or above.
Benefits
Independent, peer-reviewed, verified, first-look information.
For: R & D, forecasting, evaluation, policy planning, background
analysis, environmental planning, knowledge upgrade.
Find: key documents, patents, rare information sources on emerging
and clean energy developments, new inventions.
User friendly, intuitive interface -- does not require pre-training.
Cost - $700.00 (US)
The Planetary Association for Clean Energy, Inc.
100 Bronson Avenue / 1001
OTTAWA, Ontario K1R 6G8 CANADA
(613) 236-6265 FAX: (613) 4 235-5876
Note: If you think that this price looks high, please give Andrew
Michrowski a call. I have gone through a considerable amount of
grief over it. When I first put the thing together, it was with the
understanding that my labors went into something that anybody could
afford.
I have heard no word from Tom Bearden on this, even though he
supposedly supplied a great deal of the data.
Also, I had hopes that this database would be expanded into a true
Encyclopedia of Energy, including the actual articles instead of
just the bibliographic references. Since the book version of this
has been published, there has been at least 20,000 additional
references that could have been added, but haven't been because of
lack of sales (I wonder why?).
If there's anybody out there who would like to drop either Andrew or
Tom Bearden a line concerning this, that's fine with me. Go for it.
Personally, I'm pretty disgusted with the whole situation and ready
to let go of it. If you want to drop me a line, my address is:
Bill Donavan
P.O. Box 915
Toccoa, GA 30577
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/elem02.asc
+198
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 4, 1993
ELEM02.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Rick Lawler.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 09-07-93 23:34
From: Micheal Mace
To: all
Given the heated debate about Bob Lazar and his claims about the
existence of element 115, I found a very interesting article in the
paper. Just when we think we know everything about physics, those
darn scientists keep running experiments that upset our "knowledge."
<G> As Ming the Merciless, in Flash Gordon, says: "Puny Earthlings!"
I have included the article in its entirety. Any and all typos are
mine, since I typed this in by hand. And by the way, the Russian
scientist's name _IS_ LAZARev - I'm not playing a funny here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From the:
San Francisco Chronicle - Monday, September 6, 1993 - Pg A2
SCIENTISTS MAKE ELEMENTAL DISCOVERY
U.S.-Russian team sheds new light on theories of atomic stability
by Charles Petit - Chronicle Science Editor
Russian and American scientists are reporting that, using a powerful
cyclotron in a lab north of Moscow, they may have found a way to
break a scientific log jam blocking efforts to make elements beyond
the 109 now known.
The new work suggests that extremely heavy elements, virtually all
of them man-made and never seen in nature, can be much more stable
than believed, making it easier to extend the list of elements.
The scientists did not make a new element but say they did make a
handful of atoms of element 106 with an unprecedented number of the
subatomic particles called neutrons in their centers. The atoms
lasted as long as 30 seconds or even longer before spontaneously
disintegrating in radioactive decay.
Element 106, which has no formal name, was first reported nearly 20
years ago by a team at the University of California's Lawrence
Berkeley Laboratory, but the Berkeley version had a half life of
less than a second and also had few neutrons in its core.
Page 1
"The goal was to be at the limits of nuclear physics, where
theory is stretched to the extreme of what we can understand,"
said Ronald Lougheed, a leader of the effort and chemist at the
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
"What our results indicate is that things are much more stable
out there than the usual theories would have predicted."
An element's atomic number refers to the number of electrically
charged protons in its nucleus. The nucleus also contains a similar
or larger number of neutrons, which have about the same mass as
protons but no electric charge.
Since discovery of 106, German scientists have managed after great
effort to create in the laboratory elements 107, 108, and 109, but
each disintegrates in fractions of a second.
Worry had grown that elements heavier than 109 might be impossible
to make.
If so, it would bring to an end an intellectual journey to discover
all chemical elements permitted by the laws of nature. It is a
quest begun by ancient civilizations such as the Greeks - who
believed all things are combinations of earth, air, fire, and water.
Modern science recognizes 92 natural elements, from hydrogen at
number 1 through uranium at 92. Since the 1940s, 17 more elements
have been created, including plutonium, neptunium, lawrencium, and
einsteinium that are even heavier.
Lougheed spoke during an interview at the laboratory that included
two members of the Russian portion of the collaboration, Yuri
Lazarev and Vladimir Utyonkov of the Joint Institute for Nuclear
Research at Dubna, some 90 miles north of Moscow. The results were
first described to a small meeting in Finland in the spring and are
being submitted to publication in the journal Physical Review C.
Lazarev is also leading a symposium on them this week at the
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Although preliminary, the work inspires intense excitement among the
relative handful of scientists who still pursue the hunt for ever-
heavier, more exotic elements.
"Boy, I hope they are right. This gives a whole new twist to it
(theories of atomic stability). I would get busy right now if I
had a machine to work with,"
said Albert Ghiorso, a senior Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory physicist
who has been a major figure in creation of man-made elements since
the 1940s.
There is no sure practical payoff to the research.
Lazarev said, however, that the behavior of atomic nuclei under the
extreme stress created by interaction of so many protons and
neutrons will help scientists understand the nature of more common
elements.
Page 2
The scientists base their conclusions on only a small bit of data.
They ran the cyclotron, a form of subatomic particle accelerator,
for 16 straight days in April. Its intense beam of neon nuclei
slammed into a target of curium. The hope was that among the
trillions of collisions, a few neon and curium nuclei would merge
into an isotope of element 106 with 160 neutrons that some
scientists hypothesized might be unusually stable.
The evidence of success came from measuring decay products, called
alpha rays, released by atoms as they decay. Only four alpha rays
of the computed energy were detected. Factoring in the efficiency
of the Livermore-supplied detector, the scientists estimate they
made about 150 neutron-rich atoms of element 106.
"We were at the extremes of what is possible with both U.S. and
Russian physics," Lazarev said. "These experiments are terribly
hard."
The U.S. Department of Energy recently ordered a shutdown of the
only remaining accelerator in Berkeley, the super-Hiliac, which
would have been able to confirm or extend the work.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/emmens.asc
+132
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
___________________________________________________________________________
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| Sysop : Jerry W. Decker | Voice : (214) 324-8741 |
| File Name : EMMENS.ASC | Online Date : 05/22/94 |
| Contributed by : Tim Niver | Dir Category : ENERGY |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARGENTAURANA - A STUDY IN THE NON-NUCLEAR TRANSMUTATION OF METALS
BY STEPHEN H. EMMENS, Ph.D,
*******************************************************
This review is done for upload and commentary to the Vangard Sciences
Research Group in Dallas, Texas and there associates by the efforts of Tim
Niver. It is hoped that, those reviewing this material, will contact the
Rex Research Archive and obtain a copy of this book by Dr. Emmens,
undertake to perform the research outlined therein, and in turn upload
their findings to the KeelyNet BBS so that we all may benefit from their
knowledge.
*******************************************************
At about the same time that John Ernst Worrel Keely met his untimely end,
Stephen H. Emmens, a contemporary of Keely's, published his work
ARGENTAURANA, in which he outlines his experimental work in transmuting a
then-commonly known alloy, "Mexican Silver" into a metallic material that,
when examined by the United States Assayer's Office in New York City, was
pronounced to be, chemically, physically and, for all practical intents and
purposes, gold.
Dr. Emmens apparently owned the laboratory at which these various
experiments took place, listing his address in the preface to his book as
being Argentaurum Laboratory, 20, Central Avenue, New Brighton, Staten
Island, New York City, New York, U.S.A.
Throughout the rest of this remarkable work, Dr. Emmens describes his
method for achieving this seemingly unachievable feat of transmuting a
silver alloy into gold - a method which included hammering dollar coins or
parts thereof, minted in Mexico, of the aforementioned alloy, in a crucible
immersed in a freezing water bath, which was then hammered with a close
fitting piston device attached to a crossarm which was operated via a cam
shaft to produce sixty impacts per minute of the piston into the crucible
and onto the alloy in question.
After forty hours or thereabouts, during which time the crucible was
maintained in a frigid water bath with the addition of ice to maintain a
uniform temperature, with occasional lapses in the hammering process out of
consideration for sleeping neighbors in the middle of the night, this
constant hammering, under maintained cold, produced what the Assay Office
in New York City was apparently happy to pronounce as gold.
As if this were insufficient by itself, Dr. Emmens produced, then sold to
the Assay Office, a total of 670 ounces of gold produced by this method.
There are several pictures in this book which, sadly, have not survived the
attempts made at xeroxing the original text for distribution purposes.
Whether or not copies of the book still exist is open to question, since it
was apparently published in England in 1899 by a publisher, George De
Boistel & Co. Printers, 30, Bridge Street, and 37, St. Mary Axe, London, E.
C.
The xeroxed copy has the mark of the British Royal Museum on several pages,
which would lead one to believe that the original copy of this xeroxed
reproduction most likely still resides there. Contained within this
volume as well is the apparently fairly lengthy correspondence Dr. Emmens
Page 1
had with Sir William Crookes, of the "Radiometer" fame, from approximately
the same time that Dr. Emmens was producing his experiments, the results of
Sir William's experiments being essentially a replication of those by Dr.
Emmens with equally good results.
Several questions obviously arise here. First, if gold could be produced by
this method, why has it not been capitalized upon, thereby making gold's
obviously superior qualities for use in electronics and similar electrical
applications far more accessible than it is at present?
Secondly, if a hoax were being perpetrated, how does it come that one of
the most recognized scientific names of the time could be coerced into
perpetrating an obvious fraud? Surely Sir William had a great deal more to
gain from debunking an obvious hoax than he had to gain from pronouncing it
a real and workable phenomenon. And, for the purposes of this article,
last, but by no means last nor least, if this method of transmutation IS
reproducible, if it does in fact work, what other metals or alloys of
metals, as yet unheard of, might we be able to produce by similar
experimentation?
The volume leaves Dr. Emmens apparently continuing his studies. No further
publications by him are known to me at present, aside from this one. To
date, I have no knowledge of the end of this man's life, nor under what
circumstances that end occurred, nor what became of his papers following
his death.
It has been written elsewhere that, prior to his death, John Ernst Worrel
Keely, denounced as a fraud, charlatan, pirate and various other nefarious
terms, none of which, as we now know, applied to him in any sense, burned
his notebooks and personal papers, to the detriment of us all. What he
learned, at great expense to himself in time, energy, and most of all,
credibility and heartache, is lost, perhaps forever, perhaps not.
At the time of this writing I am unable to carry out these studies into the
claims made by Dr. Emmens myself, much as I might like to do so. Who knows
what new metals, what new compounds, what new elements perhaps might be had
from verification of and continuation of these experiments? And did the
various notebooks of Dr. Emmens suffer the same fate, being destroyed at
his death, leaving us with only this one volume of work as a tantalizing
hint at what might be accomplished had those books been saved? Or do they
perhaps sit in an attic or used book shop somewhere, waiting to be
rediscovered and their knowledge put back to use nearly a hundred years
later?
Someone must undertake to do this work of continuing this research. Someone
must undertake to verify, and then explain, why these results, IF viable,
ARE viable. And that someone must be willing to share their findings with
the rest of us, not to deny them any material gain from their work, but to
further the knowledge base which has been won with such hard work to date.
Rather than hiding it, it must be made known. Rather than being burned in
despair, it must be preserved, so that those who come after us may partake
of what we learned, and expand upon it. For those parties interested in
obtaining a copy of this document, it may be had from the Rex Research
Archive, P.O. Box 19250, Jean, Nevada 89019 USA. The document number is
E16-EMM. I apologize to say I do not know the current cost. -- Tim Niver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excellent paper TIM!...thanks for sharing it with us!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
KeelyNet (214) 324-3501 is a FREE Alternative Sciences BBS
Your file contributions and financial support are much appreciated!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/emp1.asc
+660
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,660 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
August 25, 1991
EMP1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Nancy Stoughton.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTRO MAGNETIC PULSES
------- -------- ------
Imagine a very bright flash in the sky! No one is hurt. But, your
transistor radio stops playing, your car won't start, the telephone
doesn't ring, lights stay off, and we find ourselves in the stone
age!
THE developement of modern high-tech semiconductor devices have
paralleled unsettled relations between the nations of the world with
resulting technological advances affecting the lives of every
citizen of North America. Communications have been made faster,
automobiles more fuel-efficient and maintenance-free, TV sets,
video-tape recorders, and virtually every other piece of electronics
equipment have been improved by the advent of the semiconductor and
its high-tech advancements. The relationship between nuclear
weapons and the recent electronics advances may seem unclear, but
a nuclear attack on the North American continent could make that
relationship glaringly apparent.
ALL nuclear explosions produce electromagnetic pulses (EMP's) and
the ensuing induced voltages and currents produced in conductors
( wires and cables ) are comparable in strength to the strongest of
lightning bolts. EMP's may reach 3 million volts and 10,000 amperes
for a total of 30-billion watts of energy.
The largest commercial radio stations in the U.S. and Canada radiate
50,000 watts, or approximately one-millionth that much power! The
major difference between EMP's and lightning is that EMP's are
induced simultaneously over an entire wide area, while lightning
occurs at a single location.
Significance of the Problem
------------ -- --- -------
THREE ten-megaton thermonuclear weapons detonated 250 miles ( 400
kilometers ) above the United States or Canada would produce EMP's
strong enough to knock out the entire electrical power grid of North
America including the entire civilian-telephone network, and just
about every broadcast station.
Page 1
Virtually every piece of unprotected electronic equipment in the
country -- radios, TV sets, computers, electronic controls in homes,
office buildings, factories, cars, airplanes, and instruments in
hospitals -- would be damaged, if not destroyed. The pulses would
also damage or destroy large portions of the military command's
control and communication (C3) system.
A chain reaction could be set in motion at nuclear power plants, due
to electromagnetic pulses. Although it is a point that is frequently
disputed, the possibility exists that reactor core meltdowns might
occur as a result of EMP's.
The meltdowns would be a by-product of electronic control system
failure. The control systems are used to monitor and control the
processes at the plants.
The EMP's could cause the system to fail and result in partial or
complete loss of control over vital functions, causing subsequent
melt-downs.
We know that those nuclear plants are designed to be fail safe,
but has anyone considered the possibility of every circuit breaker
in a plant failing at the same instant?
Characteristics of EMP's
--------------- -- -----
AT an altitude of 250 miles, the gamma rays produced in the first
few nano-seconds ( billionths-of-a-second ) of a nuclear explosion
can travel hundreds of kilometers before colliding with electrons in
atmospheric molecules.
That kind of collision may take place in a region 2,000 miles in
diameter and 6-miles thick. Electrons are accelerated by those
collisions, a phenomenon referred to as the Compton effect; and upon
reaching the earth's magnetic field, they set up electromagnetic
pulses that radiate downward toward earth (Fig.1).
Due to the extremely large area of collision, vast amounts of ground
area are exposed to electromagnetic fields with strengths up to
50,000-volts per meter. The ground area exposed to electromagnetic
pulses could cover the entire continental United States and most of
Canada by one nuclear blast; if not, certainly large regions such as
New England would be electrically and electronically devastated.
Page 2
FIG. 1 -- Electrons set into motion by gamma rays from a nuclear
explosion in space will produce enormous electromotive
pulses (EMP's) when the negative charges enter the Earth's
magnetic-field. It is estimated that the ideal height for
such an explosion should be 250 miles above the Earth's
surface.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: :
: O - Nuclear Explosion :
: :
: / / :
: / / - Gamma Rays :
: --------------------------- :
: < Earth's Magnetic Field > :
: --------------------------- :
: ******* ******* ******* :
: ***** ***** ***** :
: *** EMP *** EMP *** :
: ***** ***** ***** :
: ******* ******* ******* :
: =============================== :
: EARTH :
: :
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Vulnerability
-------------
THE effects that electromagnetic pulses would have on a mass of
circuitry are difficult to predict because the interactions are
complex. But, the more complex the components, the easier they are
to damage. Power lines are one avenue for EMP damage, and a company
making a shielded tubing to go over power and signal carrying
conductors obviously had EMP in mind when they invented their
"Zippertubing". That covering acts as a partial shield to EMP's.
FOR each component, damage would come from the internal pickup of
the circuit itself, as well as surges fed to it by all other
attached conductors (power lines, other circuits,and metal parts).
ANOTHER concern is that generators and motors with their numerous
internal windings of copper wire could be rendered useless in an EMP
attack; and with subsequent inoperative water pumping stations,
desert population-centers could persih. In the dead of winter,
motors in heating units would be destroyed and the chilling freeze
in the northern portions of the North American continent would bring
those areas to a standstill. Food and fuel shipments would halt
because fusible links and electronic ignitions would be destroyed in
cars and trucks. It's difficult to conceive a family anywhere on
the continent not suffering extreme hardships.
THE more complex the electronics components, the more vulnerable
they are to electromagnetic pulses. Hardness describes the
vulnerability of an electrical device and it is best for old-style
vacuum tubes, less for semi-conductors, and even less for
microcircuitry.
It would take 100 times more EMP energy to damage the tubes than
integrated circuits. Computers may be upset through memory erasure
with 100 times less energy than required to damage integrated
circuits; refer to Fig. 3. Aircraft in the air
and parked on open surfaces would be disabled, because electronics
controls
the crafts' flight instruments and control surfaces.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:(-8)(-6)(-4)(-2) (1) (2) (4) (6) (8) :
:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::
: ###### :
: :
: $$$$$$$$ :
: :
: %%%%%%% :
: :
: &&&&&&& :
: :
:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::!:::
:(-8)(-6)(-4)(-2) (1) (2) (4) (6) (8) :
:( Powers of TEN) <Fig. 3> :
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: RANGE OF THRESHOLD ENERGY, JOULES :
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: # = Motors and Transformers :
: $ = Vacuum Tubes :
: % = Low-Power Transistors :
: & = Integrated Circuits :
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Hardening Communications Equipment
--------- -------------- ---------
HARDENING of electronics communications equipment is vital to the
military, and, to a lesser extent, the civilian populace. The
Department of Defense has established an Electromagnetic
Compatibility Program (EMCP) to ensure that all military
Communication-Electronic (CE) equipment subsystems, and systems are
protected from electromagnetic interference of all kinds.
That program was implemented to ensure that electromagnetic
compatibility is maintained through design, acquistion, and
operational phases. Numerous semiconductor manufacturers now
produce what are called "radiation-hardened" integrated circuits,
just for that reason.
THERE are three major design criteria which must be considered when
hardening against EMP's. They are cost, the equipment's ability to
survive EMP, and failure rates of the shielding components. COST
includes both installation and maintenance. Some protection
practices, such as shielding the entire communication site, may be
attractive from a technical point of view, but are impractically
expensive.
THE electronic equipment's ability to survive an EMP attack must be
measured in order to determine how much EMP protection is needed. A
testing device for measuring the radiated electromagnetic
susceptibility of an electronic device is a Transverse
Electromagnetic Mode (TEM) cell.
A TEM cell consists of a group of electronic instruments and a
special specimen holder that simulates an environment of free space.
Page 4
The TEM cell is used for performing electromagnetic
interference/electromagnetic compatibility (EMI/EMC) measurements
and evaluating protection devices.
Shielding Methods
--------- -------
IN order to predict the effect of an electromagnetic pulse on
electronic equipment, it is necessary to assess the enviroment. The
structures housing the electronic equipment are made in various
shapes and sizes, and are connected to the outside world by
conductors such as utility lines and pipes, communication lines, and
access and ventilation structures.(Refer to fig.5)
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: EMP Lightning :
: //// V V V :
: ------------------------------ :
: !* Building ! :
:P--+** ! :
: !* ! :
: ! EMP Penetration ! :
: ! ! :
: ! ! :
: +-+ * ! :
: ! ! *** ! :
: ! -----!------------------------ :
: ! ! :
:=!======!========================== :
:Gnd ! - Buried Cable :
:--------+ :
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: P = Power Lines Fig. 5. -- :
: -- A sealed metal box is an ideal :
: structure for eliminating EMP pen- :
: etration. However, power lines and :
: signal cables require entry ports :
: thus compromising the integrity of :
: a shielded building. Obviously, it :
: is apparent that doors and windows :
: would have a greater leakage effect.:
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Page 5
That combination of criteria makes the exact determination of the
interaction of an EMP with such a variety of structures extremely
difficult. However, for complex systems, it is convenient to have
several layers of shielding. (Refer to Fig. 6).
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: Shield 1 :
: ******************** :
: * Zone 1 (internal) * :
: * ============== * :
: * = Zone 2 =----* :
: * g = ########## = g * :
: * r = ############ = r * :
: * o =--###ZONE 3### = o * :
: * u = ############--= u * :
: * n = ########## = n * :
: * d = (cabinet- = d * :
: *---= environment) = * :
: * ============== * :
: * Shield 2 * :
: ****************** :
: !------! :
: ! :
: ! Zone 0 (External- :
: ! Environment) :
:----!--------------------------------:
: = EARTH :
: :
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: Fig. 6 -- More than one shield can :
: be used to secure the environment of:
: the machinery and electronic mat- :
: erial contained within a building. :
: The building can provide the initial:
: shield. Shielded rooms or metal cab-:
: inets may provide a second shield. :
: A third shield (not diagrammed) :
: would protect entry cables from :
: violating the shielded area of :
: zone 3. :
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Shield 1
------ -
A structure composed of a great deal of metal is well shielded
against electro-magnetic pulses, while a building made primarily of
wood is virtually unshielded against EMP's. Continuous, closed
sheet-metal shields are, by far, the most effective electromagnetic
shields.
It is imperative that the internal environment of zone 1 be
connected to the outside world. That fact makes a closed sheet-
metal shield impossible. Apertures in shield 1 create a special
problem in protecting communication sites from EMP penetration.
Page 6
THE electromagnetic field penetration depends on the aperature size.
If a given area of wall opening is subdivided into ten small
openings having the same total area, the penetrating EMP fields at
an interior point will be 1/SQR(10) as large as for a single large
opening of the same total area. (Refer to Fig. 7).
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: !! !! :
: ###### !! ######## !! :
: # !! # !! :
: EMP *==!! # !! :
: # !! # !! :
: # !! E *==!! :
: EMP *==!! M **==!! :
: # !! P **==!! :
: # !! *==!! :
: EMP *==!! # !! :
: # !! # !! :
: # !! # !! :
: EMP *==!! # !! :
: # !! # !! :
: # # :
: ###### ######## :
: Shield Shield :
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: Fig. 7 -- The electromagnetic field :
: penetration into a ported shield is :
: minimized by reducing the size of :
: the openings. In the diagram the :
: open area of the port of the example:
: on the right is equal to the sum of :
: the areas in the example at left. :
: The diagram clearly shows that the :
: penetration of an EMP is less when :
: equal areas are summed from several :
: small ports. :
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Therefore, it is better for a structure to have more small openings
than just a few larger openings. A common treatment for such
openings is to cover them with a conducting screen or mesh so that
the large opening is converted to a multitude of small openings, or
use a glass impregnated with metal. That glass, despite having
metal in it, offers approximately the same degree of visual
attenuation or lack of clarity as looking through a screen door from
within the house.
Shields 2 and 3
------- - --- -
THE second-level shield seperates the internal environment from the
sensitive small-signal circuits within the electronic equipment
found within Zone 2. Shielding here may be accomplished by
electrically grounding the metal cabinets and equipment.
SHIELD 3 involves the shielding of the interconnection of the
equipment. That could involve elaborate design of interconnecting
signal transmission lines. Fiberoptic signal transmission shows
Page 7
great promise here because it is not effected by any type of
electromagnetic interference.
Hardening Aircraft and Missles
--------- -------- --- -------
GENERALLY, the EMP interaction with electrical systems inside
structures such as aircraft and missles depends upon a multitude of
factors. Aircraft and missles usually have a nearly complete
metallic exterior covering that serves as a shield from
electromagnetic fields. However, that shield alone is not enough
protection against electromagnetic pulses.
Missles and Aircraft are equipped with computers that cannot be
upset even for an instant. They must be partically well hardened.
AT the present time, there is no agreement on the most effective
ways to harden aircraft and missles. Heavy shielding, like the type
used at communication sites, is obviously impractical because of the
added weight that the aircraft has to carry.
Instead, EMP resistance is designed into the aircraft's equipment.
One example of that would be in the area of circuit design. Small
loops make better antennas for EMP's than short straight lines;
therefore, circuits are designed in tree or branching layouts rather
than in more conventional circuit loops.
Is Shielding Help on the Way?
-- --------- ---- -- --- ----
IN the last decade, electronic devices have proliferated in all
areas of our lives. That influx of products has caused a problem:
Noise Pollution, or EMI/RFI ( electromagnetic/radio frequency
interference). Over 80,000 cases of noise pollution were reported
to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) in 1982.
STRANGE as it may sound, the plastics industry is coming to the
rescue with plastic electronic-equipment enclosures specifically
designed for both EMI containment and shielding. Obviously, with
EMP's as an external disturbance, the containment of a field is
academic, but the shielding from an outside field is crucial.
The parameter describing that is Shielding Effectiveness (SE) and
the equation for shielding effectiveness is
SE = A + R,
or shielding effectiveness equals Absorbed plus Reflected energy.
HIGHLY conductive materials such as pure metal shields reflect
approximately 99 percent of the energy and adsorb 1 percent. But
plastics with metallic composite fillers, metallic paints and
sprays, or even impregnated wire meshes still reflect 80 percent of
the energy and absorb 20 percent.
If EMP's and the disturbing effects of electromagnetic fields still
seem like an abstraction or a physicist's dream, consider that
event.
A manufacturer of buses designed for city use had just delivered a
fleet when, during a test drive, a problem was discovered. After
Page 8
going over the top of a hill, the driver tried to brake, only to
discover he had no brakes until he got to the bottom of the hill.
Upon logical investigation of that problem, field-strength meters
demonstrated that a local television station had a lobe-shaped
radiation pattern that intersected the hill's apex.
The microprocessor-controlled anti-skid braking system on the bus
had sensitive circuitry that became inoperative because of the TV
signal. The bus, though, was made safe by properly shielding the
enclosure housing the electronics. Graphite, a moderately good
conductor, is fabricated within large plastic sheets for
applications such as that.
IF a signal as small as that can effect circuitry that drastically,
you can imagine what an EMP could do and likewise you can see how
crucial EMI shielding is. But will EMI shielding be universally
implemented into new equipment?
The Military's Involvement
--- ---------- -----------
THE military is very concerned with EMP's. The Army has established
its Aurora Tree test facility in Aldelphi, Maryland. The Navy has
the Casino and Gamble-2 x-ray emitting facilities, but the Air Force
probably has the most interesting project of all. It is the
Trestle, after the railroad structure it resembles.
THAT 12-story (118 feet) high, 58-meter (200-foot) square deck is
flanked by a 50-foot wide adjoining ramp upon which aircraft to be
tested are rolled up. The Trestle can support aircraft weighing
550,000 pounds and is built with one-foot by one-foot wooden columns
using no nails or metal of any kind. That largest glue-laminated
structure in the world uses 250,000 wooden bolts to hold its six-
million board feet of lumber together --- enough for 4,000 frame
houses. The structure at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico cost
approximately 58-million dollars.
THE Trestle has two 5-million volt pulsers that discharge energy
into wire transmission lines surrounding the aircraft under test.
Sensors capture aircraft response signals and fiber-optic channels
transmit that sensor data to computers for processing.
The processing equipment, though, naturally resides inside a very
well shielded structure. The B-52G's OAS (Offensive Avionics
System) is one of numerous studies directed primarily at testing the
electronic hardening of military systems.
The Future
--- ------
THE effects of EMP on our lives is becoming known to many on the
North American continent as it is being discovered by all the
citizens of the free world. Its political implications are not the
topic here, but rather the facts in this article reveal to what EMP
is and what it can do to the technological devices we rely on every
minute of the day.
Page 9
The next time a solar flare disrupts radio communications around the
world for a few hours, or maybe a few days, recall that man with one
nuclear device can outshine the damage old Sol creates by many fold.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
-----------------
ElectroMagnetic Pulse (EMP): An electromagnetic field of high
intensity and short duration that may be caused by a nuclear
explosion.
-----------------------------------
Electromagnetic Field: A magnetic field produced by electricity
(the flow of current in a wire or electrons through a medium
such as a vacuum). It is usually expressed in volts per meter.
-----------------------------------
ElectroMagnetic Compatibility (EMC): The ability of an electronic
device to deal with electromagnetic interference and function
properly.
-----------------------------------
ElectroMagnetic Interference (EMI): Any adverse effect on electronic
equipment due to an electromagnetic field.
-----------------------------------
Shielding or Hardening: A method used to protect electronic devices
from EMP interruption or damage.
-----------------------------------
Written: Art Reichert / March 21, 1988
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 10
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/empweap.asc
+204
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : EMPWEAP.ASC | Online Date : 12/21/95 |
| Contributed by : Bill Beaty | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
This file is from Bill Beaty's website as listed above.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SearchNet's Neotech Mailing List
Forwarded by Glenda Stocks (1:330/201)
Area : I_UFO (I_UFO)
From : Chris Terraneau,
To : Rich Boylan*
Subj : Re: sdi weapons systems
Hi Rich!
RB> I would be interested in hearing more about the High Power Microwave (HPM)
RB> weapon system: how it works, power output, narrow or wide beam
RB> application, range, deployment status, etc.
The HPM demonstrator we built consisted of basically two sections. A so-called
Marx generator, which produces a very brief, very high voltage, high current
pulse, and a magnetron/antenna assembly, which converts the pulse current into
an intense burst of microwave energy and then directs it towards a target.
The demonstrator was housed in a trailer which had its own 15kW diesel
generator, and they used to tow it out to the desert to test it. The testing
was done at the Cibola Range of the Yuma Proving Ground near Yuma, Arizona.
A commercial 100 kV DC power supply was used to charge the 20-stage Marx,
where it charged its capacitors in parallel, and then via a series of spark
gaps discharged them in series.
With the power supply set to 27 kV, the Marx would output a 265 kV, 3500
ampere, 21.4-nanosecond pulse. The spark gap array was pressurized with air,
and the air pressure was regulated so as to control the point at which the
Marx would fire. This allowed the system to operate over a range of output
power levels.
One megawatt was a typical pulse-power output, and with typical 50% magnetron
efficiency, a half-megawatt RF pulse could be achieved. The negative-polarity
output pulse from the Marx was coupled to a rather large, cold-cathode
magnetron tube equipped with a superconducting magnet.
The magnet was cooled to superconducting temperatures by liquid helium, and
the magnetron itself was evacuated by a small vacuum pump. A specially-
designed magnet power supply (1 volt, 70 amperes) was used to energize the
magnet assembly.
A waveguide couples the resulting microwave energy (4.4 GHz) to a 10-foot
diameter dish antenna, which was mounted several feet above the trailer.
Precautions were necessary around the operating equipment to protect
personnel. Strong magnetic field, X-radiation from the magnetron, and RF
hazard from the antenna all had to be considered. A zone of "denied
occupancy" was set up in front of the antenna, which was basically a 12-degree
cone which extended some 800 meters out in front of the antenna.
The most intense part of the beam occupied a 6-degree angle, and in the center
of the beam at a range of 30.5 meters, 9.85 watts per sq cm was developed. I
never went out to the test range myself, but the guys who did told me they
used to set up electronic equipment downrange, and try to destroy it.
Apparently it worked great! They mentioned personal computers, and LCD
wristwatches, amongst other things. If they tested it on any military
electronics, I was not told specifically what type of equipment.
I did hear, however, that an Army land mine was detonated at a distance of
two miles. I was told by one person who had been with the company a long time,
that there was a videotape floating around someplace that showed a rat inside
a waveguide with a clear window on the side. The rat was then subject to ever-
increasing HPM pulses, which caused him to experience (apparently) great pain,
and then death.
I do not know the power levels used in this experiment, and I never heard
anything about this particular demonstrator being used on any humans or other
biological specimens. The date of all this was 1987 to 1989. The company had
some old photos of other HPM and EMP simulation equipment, which to me looked
like they could have been taken in the 1960s.
In approximately 1990, the company built a two-man carried portable HPM
generator. One guy carried the Marx generator (sulphur hexaflouride gas
insulated), high voltage supply (50kV) and battery pack on his back, and the
other carried the magnetron tube and antenna.
The two were connected together by a high voltage coaxial cable. Apparently,
this device was a complete failure. It only produced a 300-watt output,
probably due to not having a strong enough magnet on the magnetron. Since man-
carrying a Dewar full of liquid helium was out of the question, they used
barium-ferrite permanent magnets.
I remember them taking a photograph of it before turning it over to the
government sometime in 1990. As far as current deployment status, I really do
not know. I do know that the Army was very pleased with the HPM demonstrator
(trailer-mounted version), but shortly after all this, the HPM division of the
company was sold to General Atomics Corporation, the four guys and all the
equipment then being transferred there.
Up to that point, it was obvious that the HPM/EMP research had been going on
for many years, and it was very well funded. The huge screen rooms they had,
and all the state-of-the-art analysis and data logging equipment was testimony
to that. That Marx generator was truly a work of art!
RB> Also, I have been shown by a retired air Force Colonel a photo of an
RB> Electro-Magnetic Pulse weapon. Am also interested in power output, target
RB> types, range, and deployment status. I believe one was used near Eglin
RB> Air Force Base/Hurlburt Field USAF/CIA/Special Forces headquarters near
RB> Mary Esther, Florida Panhandle. What do you know about Florida and New
RB> Mexico sites specifically?
Earlier this year, I spoke to abductee Leah Haley on the phone. She was very
gracious in her information, and sent me a color Xerox of a supposed EMP
weapon located on the beach at Eglin in Florida. Maybe you've heard her story
of how the alien spacecraft she was in was shot down there on the beach by
such a weapon. How she and her alien (and human???) captors were taken into
custody by military personnel.
She sneaked back there on the beach at a later time, and photographed the
device. I have a couple of .GIF images of it on my BBS at (619) 635-8685. They
are HALEY1.GIF and HALEY2.GIF in the misc image files area. There's also a
text file, HALEY1.TXT in the misc textfiles area, which contains her story as
related on Art Bell's radio program.
I would be curious as to whether or not it looks like the photo you saw of
such a device. I don't know too much about EMP weapons specifically. I did
speak to an engineer who works for a high voltage power supply company in New
Jersey a few months ago.
We got into talking about some kind of high-power switch device he built
specifically for EMP generation. Apparently, EMP generators (the electrical
kind as opposed to the nuclear kind) also discharge a high voltage pulse via a
fast switch, like a spark gap.
The current pulse is delivered to an exotically-designed sort of a Tesla
coil, but the device resonates at several frequencies, from a few MHz to
over 100 MHz. The output from this exotic transformer is delivered to a
spherical, ball-like electrode which is located in the center of a huge (30'
or more?) dish antenna.
He told me that the DIA discovered several years ago that EMP was the way to
go as opposed to HPM, because of the wide frequency output spectrum developed
by an EMP device. This means that it is much more difficult for an enemy to
design their electronics to withstand a hit by EMP.
HPM, on the other hand is easier to guard against, if you know the single-
channel output frequency of the device. He told me that the largest EMP
generator in the U.S. is located at Kirtland AFB in New Mexico. The work he
did for the DIA was apparently 5-6 years ago, and his PFN (Pulse Forming
Network) generated a 400-nanosecond pulse, quite a bit longer (and therefore
possibly more devastating) than the 20-nsec pulse of our HPM demonstrator.
He mentioned Electromagnetic Missiles were something they were developing,
which used some technique called Brittingham-wave generation. Something about
a paper written by a T.T. Woo of Harvard some 5-12 years ago. As far as EMP
weapons at Eglin, he did confirm that is where a significant ammount of pre-
deployment testing of energy weapons is done.
I asked him specifically about the possibility of shooting down UFOs with such
a weapon. Although he said he had no knowledge of such an application, he did
believe UFOs were real, as he saw one about 30 years ago himself. He was
familiar with the Biefield-Brown effect, and did indicate to me that such a
weapon could likely interfere severely with the operation of such a device.
On a slightly related issue, last spring I visited a sister company, who had
developed some kind of adaptive-mirror telescope imaging equipment for the
(get this) BMDO (Ballistic Missile Defense Organization), the keepers of the
mysterious Clementine spacecraft moon mapping mission.
BMDO was plastered all around this place. This telescope is basically a
reflector-type, but the reflector is made up of zillions of 1/4" hexagonal
segments which move rapidly under computer control. A laser beam measures
atmospheric turbulence in the viewing angle of the mirror, and adjusts its
many segments rapidly, so as to cancel the effects of the intervening
atmosphere.
The end result is that images of space rivaling those obtainable outside the
atmosphere, are obtained from the ground. Now here's the clincher: The people
there told me that the equipment was being tested at Eglin! And, a little
model of it in a glass case in the lobby of this company looks EXACTLY like
the truck-mounted dish thing in Leah Haley's photograph!
The people at this company told me that the BMDO will use this telescope to
accurately track and target incomming nuclear missiles, so they can shoot them
down. But wait, I thought that Star Wars was cancelled! Maybe they're tracking
and targeting UFOs with this device, and then shooting them down with EMP
weapons.
Perhaps Leah Haley's photo is only of the telescope device site, and she did
not see the actual EMP weapon, which could easily be located at a different
location.
RB> BTW, Hurricane Opal smashed right through Eglin/Hurlburt, and even set off
RB> a tornado which took out Eglin's water tower plus other damage. Gaia
RB> karma? Sounds good to me!
Rich, do you have a photo in your posession of the EMP device you mention? I
would really like to see it. I have a copy of the Operations and Maintenance
manual for the HPM demonstrator, and would be glad to mail you a copy. Please
give me your address again, and I'll send it off to you. Regards, Chris
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/entebbe.asc
+198
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
September 25, 1992
ENTEBBE.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This fascinating file is from our archives and I finally
found time to type it up. We kind of sat on it due to the
nature but it is definitely Keely-type information since it
deals with the "centre of gravity" and how it can be
"artificially displaced".
I won't go into the details of that but will leave it to
the other Keely researchers who understand such concepts.
We have spoken with several people who felt the Israelis have
some kind of "secret weapon" ranging from UFO's to Scalar weapons.
This is the "hardest" evidence we have found of such claims.
As always, we would GREATLY APPRECIATE the sharing of any
information related to this file, particularly technically
based articles or hints of such, if you get the drift....
ENJOY!...>>> Jerry
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file originated in WEEKEND MAGAZINE, December 19, 1977.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Israel's Secret Weapon?
A Toronto inventor may hold the key to Entebbe
by David Jones
Two books have now been written on the daring raid which rescued 103
hijack hostages from Entebbe Airport on July 3, 1976. Numerous
interviews and official explanations have been given, yet the puzzle
remains. How did the Israeli rescue mission manage to ELUDE the
radar of six nations lying beneath or alongside the flight path,
including that of Uganda.
The answer to the Entebbe mystery may lie with a 64-year-old
appliance repairman and heart patient. The first hint of Sid
Hurwich's connection with the raid filtered out last June at a
ceremony in Toronto's Besh Tzedec synagogue, where Hurwich was
presented with the award of Protectors of the State of Israel on
behalf of the Zionist Organization of Canada for a secret military
device he had given Israel SEVEN YEARS EARLIER. Six weeks later an
item appeared in the Tornont Star linking the Hurwich device to the
raid on Entebbe. The wire services picked it up and the story took
off round the world.
The most DETAILED ACCOUNT appeared in FOREIGN REPORT (we would LOVE
A COPY OF THIS ARTICLE at KEELYNET!, HINT, HINT!), a confidential
diplomatic journal produced by England's prestigious ECONOMIST
magazine. In an unsigned article apparently based on Israeli
sources, the publication reports that "all that could be learned
Page 1
officially was that [Hurwich's] invention had been used in the
Israeli raid at Entebbe last year." The article claims the
invention
"sends out electronic rays to ALTER the NATURAL COMPOSITION of
magnetic fields and CENTRES OF GRAVITY of weapons, instrument
dials and mechanical devices.
On the Hurwich principle there was no reason why the new BEAMS
could not reach and DISABLE tanks, ground-to-ground missiles
and complete radar systems.
The beams could also be TACKED TOGETHER to form a SCREEN that
would make WHOLE ZONES SAFE from bombs or missiles. The
Israeli's will NOT divulge what tests have been run, or how
the Hurwich RAY has been developed."
According to his daughter, Sylvia Winkler, Hurwich "was around 9
when he started buying broken bicycles and putting them together,
and when anybody threw out appliances, he would pick them up and put
them together."
By 1934, with no training beyond high school, Hurwich had won a
reputation as the first private appliance repairmen in Canada -
before that only the manufacturers did repairs. By the beginning of
the Second World War he was known as a man "able to fix just about
anything." Ontario Hydro pulled strings to keep him out of the army
and built a public service department around him.
Meanwhile, with government restrictions on metals used in
appliances, the repair business took off. By 1947 he had built it
up into Shock Electric, which remains one of the largest businesses
of its kind in Toronto. In another building, he started SidCo Co.,
devoted to making electrical parts. When a heart attack in 1950
just about killed him, he sold the business and went into a
comfortable retirement at the age of 36.
The idea for the Hurwich ray came to him one evening in 1969 as he
read about a rash of robberies from bank night-deposit vaults. "It
just clicked what to do," Hurwich says. "I picked up the phone to
the police - I knew a lot of the boys - and I told them I think I
can stop those thieveries in about half a hour."
Hurwich went to work in his basement with $50 worth of spare parts,
and within a week had assembled a working model to test his theory.
Inspector Bill Bolton, then head of the police hold-up squad,
assembled police and bank security officials at Hurwich's home.
"All I can recall," says Bolton "is that it was under the table -
the device, whatever it was - and there was a bedspread over the
table. He FROZE MY SERVICE REVOLVER. You COULDN'T PULL THE
TRIGGER, you COULDN'T LIFT IT UP OFF THE TABLE and even on the
table, you COULDN'T PULL THE TRIGGER."
Hurwich continues: "And then I said 'Now take a look at your
watches.'" I remember one of them said, "When did this happen?" and
I said, "The minute you walked through that door. You walked in
there about 25 minutes ago. Now look at your watches. You're late
about 25 minutes."
Page 2
As the security officers filed out of his home, Hurwich's wife
overheard one of them suggest that the army should be told about the
device. "That was the first time it ever entered my mind for war or
army purposes or anything like that," Hurwich says. He went back to
work in his basement. When he felt the device was ready he
contacted a brother living in Israel. Hurwich has never been to
Israel himself but he felt "they needed it more than anybody, what
with the Arabs saying they'd push everyone into the sea." Hurwich
received a visit shortly afterward from two high-ranking Israeli
officers. After a brief demonstration they walked out with the
working model and every plan and design Hurwich had.
Hurwich insists his device is not really an invention. He says he
simply "took one of the oldest BASIC principles of electricity and
put it to a different use." Which principle he won't say, just as
he refuses to discuss how the device works. It only works on
objects that WILL CARRY A CURRENT, he says. It can be aimed and its
range depends on its power source.
"Any magnet will stop a watch," explains Dr. Howard White, a Toronto
consulting engineer. "It sounds to me like a very high-intensity
electromagnetic field that he is able to PROJECT, but I don't know
how he is generating it." White shakes his head skeptically. "From
jamming a few guns to jamming electronic equipment at long range is
a very large leap. But anything's possible."
Hurwich has never patented the device - he doesn't believe in
patents. "It's so easy to copy," he says. "I've copied things from
patents. Just make a few minor changes where they'd have a tough
time in court proving I'd broken the patent." Nor has he received
any money for his invention. Oppenheimer and Co. of New York wrote
recently to "offer any service to assist you in determining the
commercial feasibility of your work, and exploring avenues to bring
your work to useful commercial purposes." Hurwich says, "at this
stage money doesn't enter my mind. I am not a youngster and I can't
take it with me."
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Note
Assuming Mr. Hurwich is still alive, he would be about 74 years
old by now. We wonder if he might be willing to discuss the
device further NOW? If anyone out there in Toronto wants to
do some research, we would all appreciate any feedback you
could provide. Also, we understand that a beam can be
projected from a POLARIZED (usually circular) antenna.
However, how it could affect a field RATHER than just anything
in its beamed path is curious.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/ether_tb.asc
+198
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 28, 1993
ETHER_TB.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Terry Bastian.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Associated .GIF files : ETHER1.GIF
ETHER2.GIF
ETHER3.GIF
ETHER4.GIF
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The following papers are the private research and conclusions of
Terry Bastian, who like many of you desire to DISCOVER and
UNDERSTAND the world around us.
Ether 1 & 2 GIF's do not have any text and are self explanatory.
Ether 3 & 4 have accompanying text file descriptions. The
information here is of a basic nature but crucial to understand in
the manipulation of Free NRG or ZPE or the Ether whatever you want
to call the source. The papers contain updated terms but were
originally written on paper in 1987.
We as a group of investigators must not say "Where are the real
machine designs!" so much as we need to say "How do these things
work and what are the physical laws behind them?"
The computer wasn't invented when people discovered static
electricity by rubbing 2 dissimilar materials together. Electricity
had to be understood to an extent so we could apply it to make the
computer. And so goes this technology. Yes let's get the working
models to the public but let's also strive to learn what we are
playing with so we can be creative and use it better.
I am open to any questions and criticisms about these and other
papers that I have and will upload to KeelyNet......
Contact me thru KeelyNet or the Wrong Number BBS's.......
Enjoy the Chase for Knowledge,
Terry Bastian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Paper Ether3.txt
By Terry Bastian originally written Nov 1987.....
See Asociated GIF file.....ETHER3.GIF
The Etheric/ZPE field flows around a magnet as shown, at a rate
Page 1
determined by the amount of magnetism present.
As the Ether/ZPE spirals INTO the south pole its spiral rate
INCREASES, as does the Etheric/ZPE density to a tremendous amount.
When the energy flow EXITS the north pole the spiral rate DECREASES
as well as does the density, because the energy is being released or
liberated from the constraints of the dense material substance of
the magnet.
The atoms and molecules of the magnet when properly aligned, form a
conduit and an active ordered flow occurs in the Ether/ZPE and hence
creates a magnetic field.
Possibly the best and strongest magnet could be made by numerous
parallel strings of tightly wound continous spiraling molecular
lattices', running from North to South poles, the tighter the
spiraling the greater the effect. Spiraling resonance throughout
the overall length could also be a factor.................
See: Science Digest Sep 1985 p.18 "Magnequench Magnets"
Matteucci Effect = The axial voltage generating property of a
twisted ferro substance upon axial magnetization, also produced
when a substance is twisted in a magnetic field..
Barnet, Richardson, Einstein-DeHous Effect = When a body of a
ferro substance is rotated, a magnetic field is generated
axially, also when a magnetic field is applied axially rotation
of the body results.
Gallimore Effect = When a crystal is rotated on its z or
optical axis a magnetic field is axially generated..
"WAVE THEORY Discovery of the Cause of Gravitation" by
T.J.J.See
The works of J.G.Gallimore - Handbook of Unusual Energies (3 vol.)
Transverse Paraphysics
from Health Research (listed in CONTACT1 on KeelyNet)
and others too numerous to mention...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Paper Ether4.txt
by Terry Bastian written Nov 1987
See associated GIF Ether4.GIF
The Ether\ZPE flows in the direction of current flow. Being drawn
from the surrounding medium by electron movement the Ether\ZPE seems
to funnel in upon the conductor, and by being drawn in, the medium
rotates or spirals onto the conductor, perhaps by the electrons'
spin.
The areas of equipotential pressure in the rotating medium around
the conductor are what we have come to know as the magnetic field
about the conductor or equal lines of Etheric\ZPE density. This
disturbance about the conductor expands at the rate of the speed of
light.
Page 2
The illustration shows only one electron or unit of current flow,
but expand the illustration to the entire length of the conductor
for the combined flow of all free electrons in the conductor.
The depth of conduction in the conductor is a representation of the
Etheric\ZPE PENETRATION into the conductor which depends on the rate
of change or direction of flow, otherwise known as the frequency of
the applied current.
DC would have maximum penetration due to allowing the Ether\ZPE flow
time to penetrate through the conductor, when the frequency is
raised the flow meets the conductors' molecular structure and atomic
forces and isn't allowed time to penetrate the substance, a
frequency can be attained where the Etheric\ZPE medium will bounce
or careen from the boundary of the conductors' surface allowing the
escape of free electrons to the air as a corona discharge.
We know this as the SKIN EFFECT. High voltage and current produce a
similar effect, due to the large voltage pressure or large current
density within the conductor itself.
See: "WAVE THEORY Discovery of the Cause of Gravitation" by
T.J.J.See
"The Awesome Life Force" by Joseph H. Cater
The works of J.G. Gallimore from Health Research and others too
numerous to mention...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard note...
The best work I have yet seen regarding magetic fields and their
specific effects is that of Albert Roy Davis and Walter Rawls of
Florida. This is brought up because their concept of north and
south is EXACTLY REVERSED from the normal way of thinking. The
explanation for WHY they chose this method of describing the N/S
effects escapes me at the moment but needs to be looked up and
placed into a useful file.
Davis/Rawls found that North pole energies caused a contraction
of mass that was also associated with an alkaline condition.
While South pole energies were exactly opposite, that is, mass
expanded in the presence of this force and tended toward
acidity. One of the interesting comments made in the Meier UFO
case was that the ships used a CCW South pole force to provide
lift. Please take the .GIF files, they are very well done.
Jerry
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/evgray.asc
+496
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,496 @@
(word processor parameters LM=1, RM=7 , TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
March 23, 1990
This article on the EMA-4 engine was one that appeared in a
magazine called `The Probe The Unknown' in June 1973. It was in
one of my boxes marked STUFF. I don't know where I had picked it
up, but I thought it might be of some interest to you. If anyone
has more information on this please let us know, so that it can be
included on the KeelyNet BBS.
Ron Barker
THE ENGINE THAT RUNS ITSELF
An unconventional approach to harnessing energy has
created a motor that requires no fuel and produces no waste.
It's inventor say it is the answer to man's
transportation and power problems.
By Jack Scagnetti
Rationing in Effect as Winter Catches U.S. Short of Fuel.
Fuel shortage May Curtail Rail Service.
Smog-Proofed Autos Choking on Own Fumes.
U.S. May Approve Gasoline Rationing.
Pace Picks up in Quest for Clean Engines.
- Newspaper headlines from January, 1973
Catastrophic Problems, aren't they? Not only are we taking
more out of the earth than the earth has to give, but we're also
using what we take to ruin the air above.
Sitting in a small laboratory in Van Nuys, California is a
curious creation which, based on the results of dynamometer tests
and other rigid trials, claims to be the solution. It's called
the EMA (electro-magnetic association) motor and, in technical
jargon, is described as "digital-pulsed," "time-phased" and
"servo-controlled." Developed by EvGray Enterprises, an
independent research and development firm, the unique engine runs
on the principle of electro-magnetic transformation.
In terms more meaningful to the layman, the EMA motor
requires no fossil fuel, recycles its own energy, creates no
waste and is extremely quiet. Its size, weight and horsepower
ratios are comparable to motors and turbines now in use.
The EMA's only external power source consists of four 6-volt
batteries which never need recharging and which have the same life
expectancy as the standard automobile battery. EvGray claims
the motor duplicates the power and torque characteristics of
internal combustion engines of similar size and weight, and the
Federal and State Air Resources Board has granted the inventors a
permit to further prove this claim by installing the EMA in test
vehicles.
Edwin Gray, Sr., president of EvGray, predicts production
Page 1
costs of the EMA will be comparable to present motors and
maintenance costs will be far less. "The EMA motor promises to
make the world a cleaner place in which to live," says Gray, who
has spent 12 years developing the engine. "Perfection of the EMA
motor as a generating source could mean the availability of
inexpensive power to underdeveloped nations."
EvGray expects the EMA Motor - when tailored for specific
applications - to become a desired replacement for virtually all
power systems now in use. The full spectrum of possibilities
includes:
(1) industrial engines for application of portable welding
generators, standby electric generators, portable battery
charger, portable power tools, portable lifting
equipment, and industrial utility vehicles;
(2) engines for agricultural equipment for use on lawn
tractors, lawn mowers, soil and harvesting equipment,
horticultural equipment, and irrigation booster pumps;
(3) engines for building and construction equipment,
including portable building equipment, concrete mixers,
portable conveyors, portable compressors, and
construction machinery;
(4) aircraft, automotive and marine engines, including
automobiles, trucks, outboard motorboats, auxiliary yacht
engines, lifeboats, light aircraft, and auxiliary glider
engines
(5) engines for household and recreational equipment,
including small lawn mower, snowmobiles, golf carts and
snow blowers;
(6) engines for heavy transportation and stationary uses,
including railroad locomotives, ships, pumping sets for
atomic reactors, generator sets, and jet aircraft
engines;
(7) miscellaneous applications, including fire-fighting
pumps, airconditioning units for buses, refrigeration
units for trucks, and special military purposes
(generator sets, gas turbine, starter units, etc.).
LIGHTING AND "ENERGY SPIKES"
Gray describes the operation of his EMA motor as "similar to
re-creating lightning." He says the engineering and scientific
world has known this re-creation is possible but hasn't known how
to do it. "When lightning hits the ground, causing a 10-million-
volt buildup, where does energy come from to make it from a static
charge to a lethal charge? Nobody really knows."
Richard B. Hackenberger, Sr., vice-president in engineering
for EvGray, explains how the EMA motor system operates. "Power
from the high-voltage section," says Hackenberger, "is put through
a system of electrical circuitry to produce a series of high-
voltage `energy spikes.' The spikes are transferred to a small
control unit, which in turn operates the major motor unit.
The control unit, acting in a manner similar to that of a
distributor in an internal combustion engine, regulates the
spikes, determines their polarity (whether they be north or south)
and directs their power to selected electro-magnets in the main
unit.
Page 2
While this occurs, the recycle/regeneration system is
recharging the batteries with 60 to 120-amp pulses. The
electro-magnets are located on both the rotor and stator of the
large motor. Attraction and repulsion between the two sets of
magnets causes the motor to operate and generate horsepower.
Once in motion, the motor recharges the batteries as a result
of the recycle/regeneration system. To prevent condensation in
the main cylinder, a half-pound of air pressure has to be
maintained. Air is routed through the programmer for functional
purposes. When the ambient temperature is 90 degrees, the motor
operates at 170 degrees."
In short, the principle of the engine is to create
electricity and recycle energy by the factor that every time
magnets are energized off the peak of transients, a charge goes
back into the battery.
It's not a constant charge, but a pulse charge of 60 amps or
better; thus, the battery must be of high quality. The batteries
for the EMA motor are furnished by McCulloch Electronic
Corporation of Los Angeles.
After extensive research and testing, EvGray chose the model
110-75 Energy Center, which is said to produce maximum power for
its weight and volume over an exceptionally long life span. This
is achieved partly by use of an ultra-lightweight plastic case
that minimizes dead weight (energy-storing components comprise
more than 90 percent of the battery's weight).
Features of the battery include extra-large plates separated
by indestructible glass-rubber separators and a specially
formulated lead oxide composition. Two of the 6-volt batteries
are used for operation, while the other two serve as a reservoir.
Mallory Electric Corporation of Carson City, Nevada, has also
made a major contribution toward the design of the electronic
pulsing system.
LONG-RANGE AND POWERFUL
Electric-powered vehicles are not new, of course, but the
poor energy-storage factor of batteries and their heavy, large
size have thus far made them impractical for use in any vehicles
requiring a long-range capacity.
This drawback has restricted the market for electric power to
small limited performance vehicles. The maximum range of these
vehicles when driven at 40 miles per hour has been approximately
150 miles. Range is affected by the number of stops and starts,
grades traversed, and acceleration demands.
The EMA motor needs only to run at 500 rpm for the normal
recharging system to work. In fact, it recharging capabilities
are such that the EvGray's next version of the engine won't have
an alternator or air pump. The air pump will be replaced by
blades on the rotor.
"The idea of a self-sustaining electric motor," says Gray,
"at first appears to go against much of the theory of electricity
Page 3
and conservation of energy. The EMA motor does not, however,
violate the basic laws of physics, but rather utilizes them in a
unique integration in a system in order to maximize upon the
characteristics and interrelationships between electrical,
magnetic, and physical components. The EMA prototype motor has
had considerable operating test time and has been adapted to
standard and automatic automobile transmissions."
Dynamometer tests have recorded the rpm's of EvGray's motor
at 2550 constant, the torque at 66 pounds constant. Brake
horsepower is 32.5 After a test run of 21 1/2 minutes, the battery
voltage reading was 25.7.
Only three surfaces make physical contact with the motor a
feature which dramatically limits friction and increases
efficiency. "An internal combustion engine is only 30 percent
efficient," says Gray. "Our engine is 90 percent efficient." A
prime factor in friction control is the so-called "magnetic
vacuum," created in the drum, which literally takes the pressure
off of end bearings and allows the rotor to float within the drum.
"Our motor creates power surges-one behind the other-in
microseconds," says Gray. "By doing this, we are able to direct
the magnetic flux field. The magnetic flux is a coolant source,
so we need no cooling system."
Gray says the engine is not affected by rain, heat, cold any
other type of inclement weather, or by driving through tunnels.
"All this motor needs is oxygen. The only external magnetic
effect is that another field system cannot operate within this
same battery system. The magnetic field orientation is 360 degrees
in all directions."
The new EMA prototype will weigh about 320 pounds, less than
most present internal combustion engines. It will measure 12
inches in diameter, 18 inches in length. (Size is linear to
horsepower required.) According to Gray, further research should
make it possible to possible to reduce the size and weight through
the use of lighter metals and more sophisticated circuitry.
Gray says most of the motor's components can be built in a
machine shop with a mill and lathe. The exceptions are the drum
itself, the electro-magnets, and a few miscellaneous items bought
over the counter in an auto supply store. The company plans to
enter into worldwide licensing agreements to manufacture the
motor.
The safety features of the EMA are impressive. There's no
fan, no exposed high-voltage component parts, no exhaust fumes, no
fuel tanks to explode, and no water reservoirs to clog up, freeze
or overheat.
EvGray believes the reliability of the engine will be
excellent, and maintenance should be the engine will be excellent,
and maintenance should be minimal because there's no carbon, water
varnish or other impurities - which occur normally as a result of
burning oil or gasoline - to damage parts. There is no
carburetor to clean and adjust, no oil filter to change, no gas
filter, smog valve, gaskets, radiator, water pump ot timing chain.
Plug-in type construction makes replacing parts quick and easy.
Page 4
Gray says the training time for EMA mechanics is less than that
for mechanics working with a standard electric motor and far less
than that for those preparing to work on internal combustion
engines.
The EMA also favors the eardrums of mankind. Its noise
emission is far less than that of all other power sources, and
Gray claims there will be no increase in noise as the engine ages.
In fact, electric-motor noise is almost imperceptible when
properly suppressed.
Perhaps the reason Edwin Gray, now 48, has been able to
create such an unconventional engine is his unconventional
education. One of 14 children, he began tinkering with magnets and
electricity as a boy. He left home when he was 15 and served a
year in the U.S. Army before it was discovered he was under age
and he was given an honorable discharge. During that year, he
attended an Army school for advanced engineering. After the attack
on Pearl Harbor, he reenlisted, this time entering the Navy. After
serving three years of combat duty in the Pacific zone, he
returned to civilian life and found work in the field of
mechanics. Resuming his experiments with electro-magnetic power,
he seriously examined the theory of energy used is energy spent.
After years of research an experimentation, Gray conducted
his first test of the EMA motor in 1961. The engine ran briefly
and then broke down. Discouraged but not defeated, he
constructed a second electro-magnetic motor, which ran for an hour
and a half before failing.
A third prototype ran for 32 days attached to various
automotive transmissions and test equipment. It was then
dismantled for analysis, and detailed reports were prepared.
After rejection by large corporations and money promoters, Gray
formed a limited partnership in 1971 and constructed the fourth
EMA prototype.
With assistance from nearly 200 private citizens, EvGray
Enterprises has spent $1.1-million in the attempt to recycle
present lost energy and redirect magnetic forces with the EMA
motor.
Dick Hackenberger, who comes from a more conventional
background, compliments Gray's raw genius with 25 years of
diversified functional and management experience in the
engineering field. He holds an EE degree from Northeastern
University and is a senior engineer in the Institute of Electrical
and Electronic Engineers. Hackenberger has held positions with
the Sony Corporation of America and Sylvania Commercial
Electronics, and he has served as an engineering consultant to the
U.S. Navy.
Other EvGray officials include Arthur M. Lange, vice-
president in charge of public relations, and George C. Demos,
vice-president in charge marketing. Lange has served in
management and public relations capacities with both Ford and
General Motors, while Demos has worded as division general manager
for Control Data, director of marketing for RCA, and president of
his own manufacturing firm.
Page 5
RAISING A FEW EYEBROWS
The electro-magnetic motor has attracted attention from
important government agencies, including the Environmental
Protection Agency, the Air Resources Board, and the Department of
Transportation. Governor Ronald Reagan of California last year
presented Gray and his wife, Evelyn, with a certificate of merit.
Others indicating interest in the project are congressmen Barry
Goldwater, Jr., Edward R. Roybal, Del Clawson and James C.
Corman, U.S. Senator Alan Cranston, and state senators Alfred E.
Alquist and Nicholas C. Petris.
John Brogan, head of the Environmental Protection Agency's
advanced automotive power systems development division, says his
25-man staff has looked at approximately 20 alternate engine
proposals each week for the past two years.
He says nearly half of the proposals are of "perpetual
motion" machines; that is, machinery that would produce continuous
movement without any outside energy source. The concept of
perpetual motion violates all known laws of thermodynamics.
According to EvGray, some experts believe the EMA is a
perpetual-motion engine and is, therefore, invalid. Gray himself
refutes this belief. "The EMA motor is definitely not perpetual
motion," he insists. "Only those in the scientific world who
understand the theories of physics are able to comprehend how our
motor works. There's only a handful of such persons.
"The programmer directs which magnets are to be energized for
what length of time and in what polarity. There are several
attractions and repulsions taking place at the same time."
The search for the clean engine has seen the federal
government contribute $23-million to the development of new
engines in the past two years. General Motors, spent $36-million
last year alone, and Ford laid out $20-million. Senator John V.
Tunney of California has proposed legislation to divert $900-
million from the Highway Trust Fund into a three-year crash
program to develop a clean engine.
Meanwhile, Edwin Gray, after 12 years of research and
development, believes he has found the answer for a comparatively
meager $1.1-million. Time will tell whether or not he is right.
EMA-4 MOTOR PRELIMINARY TEST DATA
Input Power 12 volts dc (of a 24 volt dc system, making
use of a 12 volt standard starter motor).
RPM 2550 RPM constant.
Torque 66 lbs. / constant.
Horsepower 100 HP
Brake Horsepower 32.05
Foot-pounds/minute 1.057.650
Page 6
Foot-pounds/second 755 lbs. (includes 110 lbs for four 6-volt
batteries).
Volume 42" long x 18" wide x 22" high. (This is
overall geometry. including control unit, etc.
- The basic motor is a 16" dia. x 24"
cylinder, which can be repackaged into a 9"
dia. x 12" cylinder).
Test Run Time 21.5 minutes.
Battery Voltage 25.7 volts.
Reading at test
completion
Ambient Temperature 84 degrees constant.
Humidity 51%
Fuel Consumption None (other than air).
Cooling Conduction / 1/2 pound (flow through) air
pressure.
Magnetic Field 360 degrees-all directions during motor
Orientation operation.
Lubrication High temperature bearing grease (2 bearings).
Vibration Negligible
Noise Level No direct reading taken - without shielding,
no louder than small kitchen appliance, e.g.,
fan, etc.
Power Hazard Fully secure - full design safety features.
Start Mode Simple push button - standard 12V starter
motor.
Operating Mode Rheostat principle with switchable RPM
range(500-1300-1950-2550-3350-4100 RPM's)
Physical Condition Motor mounted on wheeled test stand - no
external connections to stand.
Page 7
EMA - 4 MOTOR BLOCK DIAGRAM
ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿
³ Mechanical Conversion ³
³ of Power-Drive ³
³ Shaft-Transmission, etc. Ã<ÄÄÄ¿
ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ ³
³
³
ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÁÄ¿
³ 24 V ³ ³High Voltage³ ³ ³ ³Motor- ³
³Power ³ÄÄÄÄ>´ Generator ³ÄÄ>´Control Unit³ÄÄÄÄ>´Rotor/ ³
³Supply Ã<Ä¿ ³ Circuits ³ ³ ³ ÚÄÄ>´Stator ³
ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ ³ ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ ³ ÀÄÄÄÂÄÄÂÙ
ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ ³ ³ ³
³ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄ¿ ³ ³
Ã<ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄij Regeneration- ³ ³ ³
³ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ´ Recycle Unit ³ ³ ³
³ ³Electronic Pulsators (C)³ ³ ³ ³
³ ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ ³ ³
³ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ ³
³ ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» ³ ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» ³
ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄĺ AlternatorºÄ<ÄÄÄÄÄÙ º Air Pump ºÄ<ÄÙ
º (B) º º (A) º
ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ
BLOCK DIAGRAM OF THE EMA-4 shows how energy is transmitted from
the four 6-volt batteries (power supply) to the various stages of
the engine and returned.
Both the air pump (A) and the alternator (B) are optional
equipment. The air pump prevents condensation around the drum and
provides added assurance of air in some environments.
The alternator is not needed for most applications, including use
in vehicles, but may be desirable in heavy generator rigs.
The electric pulsators (C), which are contained in the
regeneration-recycle unit, are capable of pulsing at 200,000 times
per minute, and the pulsation at 60-to-120 amps is fed back to the
batteries.
Submitted by : Ronald Barker,
Vangard Sciences
FINIS
Page 8
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/evgray2.asc
+372
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,372 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 26, 1991
EVGRAY2.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Chris Lightner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
EMS - Electronic Power That Could
Change The World's Economic Power Picture
Though harassed by the authorities, under-financed and ignored by
science, business and industry, Edwin V. Gray, a self educated Los
Angeles inventor has developed a revolutionary electromagnetic motor
that promises to greatly improve conditions for the world.
A vast new technology is opening because Gray invented a motor that
delivers super-efficient horsepower at lower cost with less wear and
tear than any other device known. His EMS motor takes a giant step
closer to the magnificent, whirring power plants visualized by
science fiction writers.
Implications for the auto industry alone are staggering: Gray
appears to have the answer to Detroit's dilemma involving practical
electric vehicles.
Ed Gray's name may well go down in history alongside the likes of
Edison, Marconi, Goddard and Bell - that is, if the establishment
will get off his back.
A social quality known as "resistance to change" and another called
the "economic status quo" have made his motor a tale of bitter
frustration. Most people would have quit in despair long ago.
However, tireless experimentation and remarkable determination have
paid off in a technological triumph that brings the heretofore
untapped source of static electricity into the workhouse of man. Any
expert can tell you "static electricity will not do work." Gray is
slowly and doggedly proving the experts wrong.
His battle is not over, but perhaps the tide is finally turning in
his favor. His corporation, EvGray Enterprises, is seeking the
necessary financing to further develop the motor. His efforts were
thwarted by serious legal problems which recently were resolved when
he agreed to enter a guilty plea to a minor Securities and Exchange
violation.
Page 1
Thus nearly two years of legal entanglements came to a close. The
legal costs alone have been near ruinous. He's won some important
battles, but he could yet lose the war.
Gray's start in life wasn't promising. He was one of six children of
a poor Washington, D.C. family and grew up in the streets. Few
suspected he had the stuff of a genius. Like many kids, he was
fascinated by engines and motors, but his thinking about them went
far beyond normal curiosity. He wanted to know more than just what
made them run.
Gray dropped out of school at 14 and began tinkering with ideas. He
was so lacking in formal education that he did not realize for some
time that his thinking was both original and far advanced.
Three things about electricity fascinated him:
(1) a capacitor can store an electric charge and release it on
demand,
(2) pulses of electricity can be sent out and brought back,
(3) lightning bolts seem to be more powerful when closer to
the earth where the atmosphere is heaviest.
These were facts known to every physicist. But to most such
scientists, they were unrelated facts. Ed Gray's genius was in
correlating this knowledge into new technology.
"I remember getting a shock when I grabbed a charged
capacitor off a work bench," he recalled. "That simple fact
never left my mind. Then I watched when the government
people were testing the first radar across the Potomac River
- it stuck in my mind when one of the men explained it as
`pulse out, pulse back.'
"And I've always been a nut about thunderstorms. I watched
lightning by the the hours. I noticed how much stronger it
appeared to be when closer to the earth and just naturally
concluded that more air had something to do with it."
These three principles, plus a super secret means of generating and
mixing static electricity, make up Gray's EMS motor.
Gray grew to adulthood, married, divorced and married again. For 22
years, the idea of a special new kind of motor turned over and over
in his mind. Meanwhile, he had moved to Southern California where he
maintained a workshop and sought the advice of knowledgeable men.
Bit by bit, his ideas began to take shape.
By 1973, Gray was ready to demonstrate his motor to the world.
Wisely, he had incorporated himself to prevent the EMS motor from
being gobbled up by some industry giant who might want to suppress
it.
As early as 1957, Gray was pounding the pavement seeking financial
backers. Over the years he picked up 788 stockholders, all friends
or friends of friends. This fact was to stand Gray in good stead
Page 2
later when the Los Angeles County District Attorney hit him with
questionable charges of fraud.
From 1957 to 1972, Gray raised about $2 million to make the EMS
motor a reality. That same year he incorporated and built the first
working model.
Still, more money was a big need. He approached top electronics and
automotive firms such as General Dynamics, Rockwell International,
Ford, General Motors and the like. Usually he was turned away. "When
they did listen to me and got a little interested, it turned out
they wanted 90 per cent. Then it was I who did the turning away," he
said.
Gray had interested some top experts, though, men who offered the
benefits of their knowledge to his fledgling firm. They included
Richard B. Hackenberger, an electronics engineer who had served Sony
and Sylvania, as well as Fritz Lens, a master machinist who
understood what Gray was trying to accomplish. In spring, 1973, Gray
and his associates unveiled the EMS motor to the world.
In the workshop, a six-volt car battery rested on a table. Lead
wires ran from the battery to a series of capacitors which are the
key to Grays's discovery. The complete system was wired to two
electromagnets, each weighing a pound and a quarter.
The first demonstration proved that Gray was using a totally
different form of electrical current - a powerful but "cold" form of
the energy.
As the test started, Gray said: "Now if you tried to charge those
two magnets with juice from the battery and make them do what I'm
going to make them do, you would drain the battery in 30 minutes
and the magnets would get extremely hot."
Fritz Lens activated the battery. A voltmeter indicated 3,000 volts.
Gray threw a switch and there was a loud popping noise. The top
magnet flew off with powerful force. Richard Hackenberger caught it
in his bare hand.
What happened was that Gray had used a totally different form of
electrical current - a "cold" form of energy. The fact that
Hackenberger caught the magnet and was not burned was evidence
enough of that.
It was a moment in history perhaps as important as the day in 1877
when Thomas A. Edison threw a switch which lit up a glass bulb that
continued to glow all day and part of the next.
The demonstration was witnessed by two unbiased experts and the
author of this article, who later printed the story of what he had
seen in a national publication.
"The amazing thing is that only a small per cent of the energy was
used. Most of it went back into the battery," Hackenberger said.
Actually, two "improbables" had been demonstrated that day. The
second was characterized by the lack of heat generated in the
magnet, excessive heat being one of the big drawbacks in utilizing
Page 3
electronics advancements. The successful test seemed to be Ed Gray's
big break. In reality, his real troubles were just beginning.
The publicity about the test brought Gray to the attention of a firm
in Denver which agreed to back him with several million in new
capital over a period of a few years. At the time, Gray planned to
test market the EMS motor in a radically new auto body called the
"Fascination," developed by Paul Lewis of Sidney, Nebraska.
The first prototypes were due on January 1, 1974. But by then
mysterious things had started to happen - misfortunes Gray suspects
were created by persons working to undermine his motor's
development. The Fascination trial was dropped.
In July, 1974, raiders from the Los Angeles County District
Attorney's office descended on Grey's plant in Van Nuys. They
confiscated plans, records and the latest working prototype of the
motor.
Investigators for the D.A. threatened to file a variety of charges
against Gray, ranging from fraud to grand theft. Yet months passed
and no charges were brought. The investigators defied all attempts
by the inventor's lawyers to get the confiscated materials returned.
Meanwhile, the D.A.'s men sought out Gray's investors and tried to
convince them to prefer charges against him. All refused.
Finally, eight months after the raid, the D.A.'s office brought a
series of charges against Gray, including grand theft, by claiming
he had raised money from investors by means of a hoax. But all the
serious charges were dropped when it when it was proved they were
unfounded.
Remaining were two counts of violating SEC regulations. In late
March, 1976, Gray pleaded guilty to these misdemeanors, paid a fine
and was freed.
The long-drawn legal hassle had other serious consequences. The
major financing promised by the Denver firm was cut off after only a
fraction of the money had dribbled in. Fortunately, there was enough
to enable Gray to build a second prototype engine.
Today Gray is very careful in the claims he makes for his motor.
Even to discuss that which has already been proved to the
satisfaction of skeptical scientists could bring the law down on his
head again.
"There has been a lot more to the suppression of my ideas than meets
the eye," he said. "It is a wonder we have survived."
But survived he has - and if some big vested interest was indeed
behind all his woes, it may be too late for such a force to stop an
idea whose time may have come.
Powerful allies are now rallying to his cause. For example, Gray was
nominated for "Inventor of the Year" by the Los Angeles Patent
Attorney's Association last February.
Two highly respected scientists, Dr. Norm Chalfin and Dr. Gene
Page 4
Wester of California Institute of Technology have publicly endorsed
Gray's motor.
Dr. Chalfin was present when Gray demonstrated the latest working
model in front of a stockholders' meeting.
"There is no motor like this in the world," Dr. Chalfin told
the group. "Ordinary electric motors use continuous current
and constantly drain power. In this system, energy is used
only during a small fraction of a millisecond. Energy not used
is returned to an accessory battery for reuse.
"It is cool running," Dr. Chalfin added, putting his hand on
the motor. "There is no loss of energy in the system."
Dr. Chalfin has placed his own considerable prestige on the line by
writing the text for Gray's patent applications, the uneducated
inventor finding the technical writing task beyond him.
At the same meeting, Dr. Gerald Price, Gray's patent counsel, told
the stockholders: "For discovering and proving a new form of
electric power, Mr. Gray has been nominated for the annual award
presented by the patent lawyers of Southern California."
Looking forward to prospects of a brighter future, Gray says he
wants to get the EMS motor into production and prove he has
discovered more than even his backers understand.
Gray is advised by his lawyers to make no claims. However, this
reporter who has followed Gray's work closely for four years has
seen and heard enough to feel safe in saying that the inventor may
be unlocking the key to a natural phenomenon referred to as "ball
lightning."
With the combined use of capacitor discharge and spikes of energy
made up of mixed static and direct current, Gray conceivably could
get more out of a battery than a battery has stored in it, simply
because he is also tapping the huge reservoir of static electricity
in the atmosphere as his motor runs.
Scientists balk at this theory, but someday Ed Gray may back them
down another notch. He has already proved right about the capacitor
discharge motor idea. With that, his motor already is revolutionary
- it runs cool. That in itself could solve a myriad of heat-
resistance problems for industry. Cool running parts do not
experience the intense friction and wear out a quickly as overheated
parts do.
If Ed Gray's motor makes its final breakthrough and goes into
general production, it may make the one time dropout into a giant in
history. It also could be a massive boon to mankind in the following
ways:
* It conceivably could power every auto, airplane, truck, train
and ship without using a drop of gasoline, kerosene or diesel
fuel.
* It could cool or heat every American home at a fraction of the
present day cost.
Page 5
* It could power the engines of all heavy industry - likewise
cheaply.
And it could accomplish all this without spitting a single speck
of pollution into the earth's atmosphere.
One question remains: How did Edwin Gray, an unschooled tinkerer,
bring together certain facts of technology and nature into a device
beyond the capabilities of brilliant, richly subsidized scientists?
"Someone trained in electronics simply would have looked at the
concept and said it cannot work," Dr. Chalfin said. "Gray did
not know this, and he made it work.
"As a result, he has provided the world with a totally new and
exciting technology."
Newsreal Series, June, 1977
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard note...
Sorry to report that Ed Gray died about 2 years ago. At this
time we do not who has controlling interest in his company,
EvGray Enterprises. We refer you to EVGRAY.ZIP or .ASC on
KeelyNet for more information.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 6
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/excel1.asc
+198
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
January 21, 1991
EXCEL1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This document has been graciously supplied to KeelyNet by
Dan A. Davidson from his own early and ongoing researches.
We wish to make everyone aware that Dan has asked that this
information be given the widest possible distribution.
It is people like Dan who work behind the scenes to help fan the
flames of expanded consciousness.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This paper is from Scientific American - August 4, 1888 - page 69
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Keely Outdone?
Several newspapers have referred to a new invention by one William
Timmis, which, if successful, will revolutionize motive power.
The inventor is an unpretentious English mechanic residing in
Pittsburg, Pa., who claims to have invented a machine by which
untold motive power can be stored or used without the expenditure of
fuel.
The story goes that he has been engaged for two years in perfecting
the invention, and is now negotiating with the government of
England, Russia, and the United States for the sale of the right to
use his discovery, which, if after examination it proves to be what
he claims, will revolutionize the motive powers of the world.
He claims to be able to create a pressure of 20,000 pounds per
square inch - more than sufficient to propel the largest ocean
steamer afloat or to move eighty laden freight cars in one train.
The machine seems to be simply an AIR COMPRESSOR of the simplest
sort.
It consists of ONE SMALL CYLINDER (six horse power), with a BALANCE
WEIGHT of 75 pounds, which runs the entire apparatus; another SMALL
CYLINDER, 5 inches in diameter, with 7 inches STROKE, compresses the
air into the tank from which the power is utilized.
Under the piston plate the inventor has placed TWO LAYERS OF BARS
CONTAINING ELEVEN DIFFERENT MINERALS, the MAGNETIC INFLUENCE of
which is the SECRET OF THE INVENTOR.
Page 1
The advantages he claims are durability, economy, and simplicity.
Experts have examined the machine and pronounce it a success.
In submitting his design to the governments named, Mr. Timmis claims
that the PNEUMATIC GENERATOR can not only be applied to war vessels
AS A MOTOR, but can be used as a defense against hostile attacks by
means of air chambers placed behind the armor plating.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard note...
What can we deduce from such a meager description of the device?
Well, for one, compressibility of a fluid, in this case gas
(air), is usually done with a one way valve leading into a
storage chamber. This storage chamber holds the highly
compressed fluid until it is gradually released to drive a
piston or rotary device with the idea of providing a motive
force.
When the compressor "squeezes" the air to a sufficiently high
density (pressure), it travels through a valve into the storage
tank. As the tank pressure increases through continuous
accumulations of small portions of gas packets, it becomes more
and more difficult for the compressor to continue to add more
air to the tank.
One of the major keys is the pressure release level of the valve
allowing the air to flow from the compressor into the tank.
Some valves are adjustable with a spring loaded gasket. When
the compressor "squeezes" a given volume of air, it overcomes
the valve spring pressure and the air passes into the tank.
Eventually we have quite a large amount of force stored in the
tank. This force can be released suddenly or as slowly as the
operator desires.
This Mr. Timmis apparently uses the intense magnetic ATTRACTION
(or repulsion) of the bars ON THE PISTON to cause a tremendous
increase in the velocity and therefore the compressibility of
the gas WHEN IT IS IN its compressive stroke.
The 75 pound weight might act as a thrust multiplier which is
further amplified by the magnetic attraction on the compressive
stroke.
With the new super high flux magnets that have been developed in
Japan, we might have a most interesting means for generating
very high pressures with a negligible energy input, if any.
Remember that the amplitude of the stored force must be
sufficient to provide a decent HP level on a controlled release.
However, the ACTUAL ACCUMULATION to the eventual maximum
pressure capacity of the storage tank can take place using VERY
SMALL INCREMENTS of compression.
The trick is to build up very high pressures using MICRO-BURSTS
of sufficient intensity but with a VERY SHORT DURATION. This is
one of the possible techniques which might eventually be used to
tap the Zero Point Energy.
Page 2
Another possible means of achieving this is a very high
intensity electromagnetic spike applied to a coil at JUST THE
RIGHT MOMENT as the piston goes INTO AND THROUGH its compressive
stroke.
One might experiment by adjusting the pulse width and the
amplitude to achieve the optimum amount of saturation of the
coil in relation to the attraction of the piston.
Indeed, it is not beyond credence to make the piston somewhat
magnetic to further increase the compressive force.
In addition to this, one could cause the magnetic field TO FLIP
AT JUST THE RIGHT MOMENT which would cause a much increased
attraction with a complementary much increased repulsion as the
piston reached the "Top of Stroke".
The addition of a weighted mass serves as a "flywheel" or
balance wheel to ensure that the piston does not stall when it
reaches the top of stroke.
If this paper inspires you to work on such a project, we urge
you to share your progress and results with others. As it was
willingly given as inspiration to us, so it is given to you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you might wish to contact Dan, he is listed in our CONTACT1 file.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/faraday1.asc
+264
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
December 7, 1990
Faraday1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
On Michael Faraday
by Waldemar Kaempffert
I (Faraday) once showed Mr. Gladstone how an induced current of
electricity could SPIN A LITTLE COPPER DISK WITHOUT TOUCHING
ANYTHING.
"What's the good of that?" he asked. He was a practical man of
affairs, and I was not.
So I gave him a practical answer, "Some day you will be able to TAX
IT," I said.
I believe that the practical man is OFTEN VERY IMPRACTICAL. He
wants an invention or discovery that will work - that is, MAKE
MONEY.
But the time comes when the invention fails to meet a new set of
conditions, so that the theorist must step in and explain the
failure and suggest a theory out of which some really practical good
will come.
No experiment is worth much unless it is explained by a good theory.
Great inventions always spring out of good theories.
I never had a systematic education. As a pupil in a local day
school, I learned no more than the rudiments of reading, writing and
arithmetic. But I read much, especially when I was apprenticed to
G. Riebau, a kindly bookseller.
By chance I attended four lectures delivered by Sir Humphry Davy,
made careful notes, transcribed them neatly, bound them and sent
them to him with a letter in which I expressed the hope that with
his aid I might forsake trade.
To my astonishment he found a place for me in the Royal Institution.
There I remained to the end of my days.
I belong to a small, despised Christian sect called Sandemanians. I
believe with them that it is futile to bring religion and science
into harmony.
Page 1
Religion is based on FAITH, science on REASONING. I ask myself :
Why am I here? SCIENCE cannot answer.
It is not concerned with PURPOSE. But religion IS concerned with
purpose, and what that purpose is must be a MATTER OF FAITH.
I believe that without faith man would drift helplessly - that love,
sacrifice, truth would have no meaning.
All told I have performed about 2,000 experiments. Without
experimentation I am nothing. Not one of my many experiments was
performed with a PRACTICAL PURPOSE IN VIEW, though many proved to be
of INDUSTRIAL IMPORTANCE.
I never patented anything. I foresaw the uses to which my discovery
of electromagnetic induction might be put, but preferred to leave
its APPLICATION TO OTHERS.
In my earlier years at the Royal Institution I had to eke out my
slender salary with outside work and in that way made a few hundred
extra pounds a year.
I soon gave this up. It is not too difficult to make money if there
is SELF-DENIAL AND INDUSTRY. To me money-making was an UNPLEASANT
DISTRACTION.
It always took my mind off the work that I WANTED TO DO.
But what was that work? As I look back at it I see that it was the
QUEST OF TRUTH.
I know that a scientist has no way of recognizing truth when he sees
it. But the QUEST GOES ON AND ON. It must go on. Without it there
would be no SCIENCE.
Suppose that science had succeeded in creating a living man -
something that could be accepted as a counterpart of the men we see
about us.
And suppose that this creature could think as we do. Unless it was
concerned with the TRUTH it would never be a REAL man, never a real
SCIENTIST.
That much I learned in my experimentation. I believe that THERE IS
SOMETHING in the world of experience THAT IS INTENT ON TRUTH.
The RESPONSIBILITY of the SCIENTIST is a responsibility to SEEK AND
PROCLAIM the TRUTH AS HE SEES IT.
We do not PATENT truths. We GIVE THEM TO OTHERS.
It is because giving is part of their creed that scientists
constitute a world-wide intellectual fraternity.
Religion may PREACH the BROTHERHOOD OF MAN; science PRACTICES IT.
The lesson is not always heeded. I believe that mankind will
prosper the more it WIDENS AND DEEPENS the SCIENTIFIC HABIT of mind
Page 2
and that the greatest of all problems is that of making this
scientific habit more EFFECTIVE.
As that scientific mind is acquired there will be more and more
giving. I BELIEVE in GIVING.
By giving I mean MORE than presenting a single precious discovery to
the world. I mean that NOTHING MAY BE WITHHELD - not even a crumb
of KNOWLEDGE.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Morse would not have invented his telegraph, (nor Tesla his rotating
magnetic field motor), nor Bell his telephone, nor Edison his many
electrical contrivances had it not been for MICHAEL FARADAY.
He was probably the GREATEST EXPERIMENTER that ever lived.
Electrical engineering as we know it BEGINS WITH HIM. When he did
his work, which was largely in the first half of the last century
(1800 - 1850), there was not even an electric doorbell.
There were only TWO SOURCES OF ELECTRICITY. One was the electric
machine with glass plates that had to be rotated and rubbed with fur
to produce electric sparks; the other was the battery.
Faraday was not only an experimenter but a theorist. As a theorist
he ranks with Newton and Einstein. He belonged to a very
materialistic period; yet he was a spiritual force in the
development of science.
A devoutly religious man, his profound belief in the spirit played
as much a part in his scientific success as his skill and his
industry. As one of the most distinguished scientists of his time,
he made scores of experiments and observations.
His crowning achievement, the one that enabled society to pass from
steam to electricity, was the GENERATION OF ELECTRIC CURRENT by
moving magnets and coils of wire relative to each other - the
PRINCIPLE OF THE DYNAMO.
Faraday lived from 1791 to 1876. One would call him the most
remarkable bookbinder who ever lived, for he was trained for this
occupation and actually practices it for a little while.
Then at twenty-two he unexpectedly was appointed a laboratory
assistant of the Royal Institute of Great Britain through the
influence of the eminent chemist Sir Humphry Davy.
Soon he was to spend two years traveling through Europe with Sir
Humphry, and he promptly began making his important discoveries.
Right away he discovered two new chlorides of carbon and
successfully liquefied several gases.
By the time he was thirty he published a sketch of history of
electromagnetism and in that same year effected the revolution of a
magnetic electric needle around an electrical current.
He went on to discover the effect of one current on another in terms
Page 3
of their deflection and attraction, and the characteristics of the
electrical current produced when a magnet is inserted in a coil of
wire. It was this that led to the development of the MAGNETO, the
DYNAMO and the GENERATOR.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/fe_revw.asc
+924
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,924 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 30, 1993
FE_REVW.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This SUPERIOR file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Ray Berry.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vangard Notes...
Vangard Sciences and KeelyNet enthusiastically recommends that
you subscribe to the IANS! They are performing an excellent
service and you can keep fully informed of what is HOT!
Also if you can manage it, we HIGHLY RECOMMEND attending their
yearly conference: the International Symposium on New Energy.
International Association for New Science (IANS),
1304 South College Avenue,
Fort Collins, CO 80524,
(303) 482-3731, $45.00 for both the IANS and INE.
IANS supports the INE.
Other excellent reference materials, journals and newsletters
are also included at the end of this file. Other addresses are
listed in the CONTACT1 file on KeelyNet.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
A Critical Review of the Available Information
Regarding Claims
of Zero-Point Energy, Free-Energy, and
Over-Unity Experiments and Devices
Patrick G. Bailey Toby Grotz
P.O. Box 201 760 Prairie Avenue
Los Altos, CA Craig, CO
94023-0201 81625-1346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract
A summary review is presented of the experiments, motors,
generators, devices, and demonstrations that have been reported in
the past few years to produce near-unity or over-unity operation.
The concepts of free-energy, zero-point energy, and over-unity
devices are not new, and many examples of such devices have been
built within the last 100 years.
26 researchers are reviewed and 11 are selected for immediate
interest and support. Whether a new form of potential energy can be
Page 1
demonstrated and successfully utilized within the near future for
the ultimate benefit of the human race remains to be seen.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitions
'Energy' cannot be created nor destroyed - it exists throughout
space and within matter.
'Perpetual Motion' does not exist -long lasting motion is easily
observable, such as planetary orbits.
'Stupidity' is not hereditary - and it is not a survival trait.
'Zero-Point Energy' (ZPE) is known as an energy that fills the
fabric of all space. Technically the ZPE results from an
electric flux that flows orthogonally to our perceived
dimension or reality. The mass equivalence of this energy
has been calculated by physicists to be on the order of
1093 gms/cm3. Henry T. Moray, Walter Russell, and
Nikola Tesla described the nature of the ZPE and designed
and built equipment to engineer its properties. It may be
possible to build devices to cohere this energy. This
would result in a non-polluting, unlimitedsupply of
virtually free energy.
'Free Energy' is a term that can have two meanings: either
the additional energy that can be obtained from a device at
little or no additional cost, so the additional energy is
essentially free; or more output energy that appears to be
available than input energy, such as in the case of
detonating an atomic bomb.
'Over-unity Devices' are those systems which appear to produce more
energy than they use. In analyzing such systems, a box is
drawn around the device and energy balances are formulated
to measure the amounts of energy coming into and out of
that box. Whether or not the device is termed an 'over-
unity' device will depend upon the size of the box. When
the box is drawn large enough, all systems or devices will
have a net energy transfer of zero. On the other hand,
when the box is drawn just small enough, the device can be
said to be an 'over-unity' device, and an intelligent
physicist will know better. From this point of view,
examples of existing so-called free-energy devices abound:
such as Hoover Dam.
So then is any generator, or any nuclear reactor. More energy
certainly comes out of a dam than went into making it (by us, at
least). And any dam engineer will tell you that it will produce
more energy than it cost to build and that it will last forever (or
at least until his kids get out of college).
So it is seen that these generators can be thought of as free-energy
devices, while they are really only energy conversion devices, and
obviously not perpetual motion machines. People who insist that
they actually are, are either very ignorant or very devious. In
such cases, examine the person's true motives.
Page 2
[Another 'free-energy' device of increasingly note-worthy attention
is the Federal Reserve, which is not an agency of the US government.
(Figgie 1992)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources of Information and Data
Ultimately, the sources for all information in these areas come from
the inventors, researchers, or investigators themselves. The US and
foreign patent offices provide some information into new
developments in these areas, yet the actual patents reveal very
little useful information and almost no experimental results.
Patent law does not require complete disclosure of all data, and
patents are held nationally. An interesting area of big business
today is the international transfer of patents at no cost.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Other sources of information and data include papers, reports,
books, and conference proceedings. Papers and books that are of
special interest are those by :
Hans Coler (1946),
the Gravity Research Group (GRG1956),
Stefan Marinov (1992),
Hans Nieper (1984),
and Shinichi Seike(1992).
Conferences that have been recently held to collect and summarize
information in these areas include the 26th and 27th Intersociety
Energy Conversion Engineering Conferences (1991 and 1992) and the
more recent International Symposium on New Energy (ISNE) (April
1993).
All of these materials are available from the sources identified in
the References section. As a result of a 1993 ISNE working
group, the working devices were categorized into four distinct
areas:
(1) Solid-State Space-Energy Generators,
(2) Rotating Space-Energy Machines,
(3) Fusion Conversion Devices, and
(4) Hydrogen Energy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Interesting Theories, Experiments, and Devices
"Some things have to be believed to be seen." [1] There are several
societies and conferences world-wide that present and sometimes
document the results of research in these areas. As this work is
not considered as mainstream science within the US, much of the
results of these researchers goes by unnoticed.
The 26th IECEC (1991) provided a forum for researchers in these
areas to voluntarily come forward and present their ideas, theories,
and results to the mainstream scientific community. They were met
with interest ranging from mistrust to awe, and from feelings
ranging from friendship to outright anger. The ranges of these
attitudes will likely depend upon the emotional stability of the
listeners.
The 26th IECEC created international interest that stimulated
further review papers to be published in the later IECECs. A
Page 3
growing group of organizations is networking on a world-wide basis
to support and organize this on-going research. Some of these
organizations are listed in the references (AREI, AFS, GRI, IASA,
INE, ITS, JPI, SEA, TI, and USP).
"New Energy News" is the new monthly newsletter of Institute for New
Energy (INE), a recently formed US technical society, created in
April 1993, that is committed to researching these technical
areas. Note that the references include complete and accurate
address and cost information, so that serious investigators have no
excuse to not investigate.
This review includes all of the information that was made available
to the 1991 IECEC, the 1992 IECEC, the 1993 International Symposium
on New Energy (ISNE), and other contributed personal source
information and documents. Our focus here is on actual data and
results - not on ideas or mathematical theories. Our emphasis here
is on repeatable experimental evidence - or on the documented
testimony of multiple reliable witnesses that have been willing to
stand-up, testify, and document a description of what they
witnessed. Just because you don't see it doesn't mean that it's not
real! The list of the researchers, experiments, devices, and
results that were addressed in this review are listed in Table 1.
The reference corresponding to each researcher is also listed.
Videotapes were made of all ref. speakers at the 1991 IECEC and the
1993 ISNE.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Possible Misleading Results
"But goodness alone is never enough. A hard, cold wisdom is
required for goodness to accomplish good." [2]
We feel that the interpretation of anyone's results can fall into
one of four categories:
(1) Lying for attention;
(2) Lying for money(funding, stock options, etc.);
(3) Inaccurate measurement or misinterpretation of the data
or results; and
(4) Accurate representation of the physical phenomena.
In our reviews, we found absolutely no evidence that any one of the
researchers we studied in Table 1 belonged specifically in
categories (1) or (2) (although so far as we know three of these
researchers have not been able to replicate their initial published
results).
Frauds are quickly discovered, if encouraged to reproduce their
results and to provide detailed information. So, we were left to
carefully analyze the results from each researcher and to carefully
draw our own conclusions.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
Table 1. A Listing of Researchers and their Experiments and/or
Devices of Current Interest
Researcher(s) Experiments, Devices, and Demonstrations
References
Adams, Robert
Adams Pulsed Motor Generator and Replication
Adams 1993
Baumann, Paul
Methernitha Swiss M-L Converter Device et. al.
Demonstrations
IECEC 1991
Bedini, John
Bedini Free Energy Generator Plans and Demonstrations
IECEC 1991
Binder, Timothy
Russell's Nuclear-Magnetic Transmutation
ISNE 1993 Experiments
Brown, Paul
Nuclear Resonant Generators and Demonstrations
IECEC 1991
Coler, Hans
Magnetstromapparat and Stromerzeuger
Coler 1946 Devices / Demos.
Grotz, Toby
Russell's Power Multiplication Principle
IECEC 1992, Experiments
ISNE 1993
Hathaway, George
Unipolar Dynamo of Novel Construction
IECEC 1991, Experiments
ISNE 1993
Hickox, Barbara
Electric Dynamo Patent
IECEC 1991
Johnson, Gary
Electrically Induced Explosions in Water
IECEC 1992 Experiments
Kelly, Don
Electromagnetic Antigravity Drop Tests
ISNE 1993, SEA
Lambertson, Wingate
WIN Process
IECEC 1991
Marinov, Stefan
Venetin Coliu Generator Demonstrations
ISNE 1993
McKie, Richard
Power On Demand Module Concept (PODMOD)
IECEC 1991
Meyer, Stanley
Water Fuel Cell Demonstrations
ISNE 1993
Moray, John
T. Henry Moray's Radiant Energy Device
IECEC 1991
Page 5
Muller, William & Kevin
Muller Motor/Generator
IECEC 1991
Newman, Joseph
Magnetic Fields Utilization Energy Machine
Newman 1993
dePalma, Bruce
N-Machine Experiments
IECEC 1991
Pappas, Panos
Energy Creation in Sparks and Discharge Experiments
IECEC 1991
Reed, Troy and Evelyn
Reed Magnetic Motor Experiments
IECEC 1991
ISNE 1993
Seike, Shinichi
Negative Energy and Landau Oscillator Experiments
Seike 1992
Storms, Edmund
Established Cold Fusion and Reproducible Results
IECEC 1993
Sweet, Floyd
Vacuum Triode Assembly Device Demonstrations
IECEC 1991
Tewari, Paramahansa
Space Power Generator Experiments
ISNE 1993
Valone, Thomas
Homopolar Generator Experiments
IECEC 1991,
ISNE 1993
While on one hand some researchers may possibly be overstating
the capabilities and results of their experiments and devices, on
the other hand many so-called 'scientific experts' are very active
in discounting ALL of the research results in these areas without
investigating the details of any of them.
"The Nobel chemist Irving Langmuir (1881-1957) used to give a
cautionary talk on pathological science, and ... told a number of
stories of pathological science and listed the features they have in
common." (Cromer, Skeptical Inquirer, 1993).
In his eight page article, Cromer states that there are many lessons
from this:
"(1) Scientists themselves are often poor judges of the
scientific process;
(2) Scientific research is very difficult. Anything that can
go wrong will go wrong;
(3) Science isn't dependent on the honesty or wisdom
ofscientists.
(4) Real discoveries of phenomena contrary to all previous
scientific experience are very rare, while fraud, fakery,
foolishness,and error resulting from over enthusiasm and
delusion are all too common.
Page 6
Thus, Glashow's closed-minded 'I don't believe a word of it' is
going to be correct far more often than not." Cromer also cites
Langmuir assaying (Langmuir 1989): "There are cases where there is
no dishonesty involved, but where people are tricked into false
results by a lack of understanding about what human beings can do to
themselves in the way of being led astray by subjective effects,
wishful thinking, or threshold interactions. These are examples of
pathological science. These are things that attracted a great deal
of attention. ... [But] the critics can't reproduce the effects.
Only the supporters could do that.
In the end, nothing was salvaged. Why should there be? There isn't
anything there. There never was."Our sincere response to you is:
If there is no initial interest - then there will be no
investigation.
If there is no investigation, there will be no research to
replicate. Your interest will spark the urge to replicate.
If there IS interest, research, and no replication, then that
fact should be published and disseminated with integrity.
If there are witnesses to the results and the results were or
are repeatable, then we feel the fault and blame lies with
the critic and not with the researcher.
Therefore, given the experiments and devices referenced
in this paper: Demand that they be tested with an open mind!
One success out of all of the failures is more than worth the
effort!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Devices of Great Interest
"Grant shook his head. It's been discussed, in the field. Many
people imagined it was coming. But not so soon."
"Story of our species, Malcolm said laughing. Everybody knows
it's coming, but not so soon."[3]
Table 2. A Listing of Promising Devices of Great Interest
with Documented Demonstrations
Researcher(s) Effects Observed Yrs Cat Doc MWs RDs Res Eff
Baumann, Over-Unity, Rotating, 1984+ 2 Y Y Y N N
Paul et. al. Self-Sustaining
Binder, Chemical Dependency 1927+ 1 Y Y Y Y N
Timothy on E-M
Coler, Gravitational Field 1942+ 1 Y Y Y N N
Hans Generator
Grotz, Over-Unity, 1961+ 1 Y Y N Y N
Toby Rotational Generator
Kelly, E-M Field Drop Tests 1992+ 1 Y N Y Y N
Don & Oscillators
Marinov, Anti-Lenz Effect 1988+ 1 Y Y Y Y N
Stefan Motor/Generator
Page 7
Researcher(s) Effects Observed Yrs Cat Doc MWs RDs Res Eff
Meyer, Energy from Water, 1980s 4 Y Y Y Y N
Stanley H2 Fracturing
Moray, Over-Unity, 1930s 1 Y Y Y N N
John and Self-Sustaining Device
Kevin
Storms, Over-Unity Thermal, 1990s 3 Y Y Y Y N
Edmund Cold Fusion
Sweet, Over-Unity, 1990s 1 Y Y Y N N
Floyd Steady-Variable Device
Tewari, Over-Unity Rotational 1993 2 Y N Y Y N
Paramahamsa N-Machine
Key : Yrs Years the Effects were observed.
Cat Categories 1 through 4, as defined under 'Sources of
Information and Data.'
Doc Documentation Exists (Yes or No) (Y/N).
MWs Multiple Witnesses Testimony (Y/N).
RDs Repeated Demonstrations (Y/N).
Res Currently Being Researched (Y/N).
Eff Large Research Effort (Y/N).
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The researchers and the works that we feel are worthy of great
attention in the near future are those that are listed in Table 2.
It should be noted that some researchers have been omitted from
Table 2 only because either their work is of a proprietary or
confidential nature, or because we could not obtain the required
data or documentation from witnesses.
Such researchers include: Paul Brown,
Bruce dePalma,
and the Reeds.
All of the researchers listed in Table 1 and not listed in Table 2
have provided and we trust will continue to provide important
contributions to and documentation of their work.
In fact, some of this work may turn out to be more important than
those currently listed in Table 2. However, at the present moment
of time; as this paper is being written, we considered those devices
listed in Table 2 to be of the greatest interest to us.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary Information and Data
Testatika
The Methernitha Swiss M-L Converter developed by Paul Baumann and
the Methernitha spiritual community in Switzerland has been
repeatedly demonstrated to many scientists upon request (26th IECE
C, Nieper 1984,SEA).
Its three foot counter-rotating disks and specially designed energy
storage system are reported to generate a steady output power of
about 3 to 5 kilo-Watts (kW) indefinitely - while sitting on top of
a table. A videotape has been produced and its narration has
been transcribed.
Page 8
Russell
Tim Binder and his team have replicated the 1927 experiments of
Walter Russell and have created fluorine from pure water vapor using
complex E-M field arrangements. This work validates Russell's
theories about nuclear structure and the proper arrangement of the
Periodic Table of the Elements.
Coler
Hans Coler demonstrated two major devices to many amazed witnesses
and officials in Germany during 1925-1945. A 60 kW device was built
in 1937, and the war bombings ended further research in 1944. A
complete 32 page report declassified by the British Intelligence
Objectives Sub-Committee is available. (Coler 1946, Nieper 1984)
The theories expressed are very similar to those presented in a
comprehensive report (GRG 1956) (the latest one we could find so
far) on electrogravitics systems, interactions of E-M with gravity,
or counterbary control devices.
Toby Grotz and his team are planning to replicate the energy
experiments of Walter Russell. In the fall of 1959, General
Chapman, Colonel Fry, Major Sargent, Major Cripe, and others from
NORAD in Colorado Springs, attended a meeting at Swannanoa, Virginia
(University Of Science And Philosophy) at the invitation of Walter
Russell.
At this meeting Russell explained the workings of a device he
proposed to build to take advantage of the vacuum state energy, and
the two directional movement of energy from gravitation,
(generation), to radiation, (degeneration).
During the following year Russell, his wife, Lao, and their
assistants built the device. The prototype that was built consisted
of two sets of dual and magnetically-sexed coils. On September 10,
1961, Walter and Lao Russell reported to their contacts at NORAD,
that the coils had worked and that the President of the United
States could announce to the world that a "greater, safer power than
atomic energy" could be provided for industry and transportation.
Don Kelly is the editor of the Space Energy Newsletter (SEA) and
has been conducting and reporting results of E-M to gravity drop
tests. He finds that energized coil assemblies have a 40% lag in
drop time over about five feet. Other related research world-wide
verifies that spinning masses appear to lose weight at high
rotational speeds.
Stefan Marinov is the editor of Deutsche Physik in Germany and has
demonstrated many experiments that confound conventional E-M theory.
His recent paper describes devices that create anti-Lenz effects,
thus increasing the generator's efficiency.
Stanley Meyer has obtained over 28 patents in both the US and other
countries that document his water fuel cell and hydrogen fracturing
process technology. He began this work in 1980 and has spent over
$1.6 million. Although he has been approached to sell the
technology, he says he has no intention to do so and plans to retain
control to make sure his invention is brought to the public for the
good of mankind. An informative and recommended videotape of his
1993 ISNE presentation is available through the INE.
Page 9
John and Kevin Moray are pursuing the technology that was repeatedly
demonstrated to the press in the 1930s by T. Henry Moray. One
device was reported to generate 50 kW for long periods of time by
itself. Edmund Storms has reviewed much of the work done
internationally in the so-called area of 'cold fusion' and has
documented the results and repeated results of the now world-wide
research in this area.
Floyd Sweet demonstrated his vacuum triode device to at least two
expert electronics technicians that have documented their
observations in sworn affidavits. A videotape was also made during
a demonstration. From a nine volt battery starter unit, nearly
continuous output powers of 500 W to 50 kW have been reported to be
observed. Experimentation is still in progress to further refine
the device and to improve its operational capabilities.
Paramahamsa Tewari has been doing experiments with a N-Machine and
has reported over-unity operation from instrument readings. He is
currently performing new experiments to feed the output of the
device back into the input to obtain a 'free-running' condition.
Many researchers have performed experiments with these devices, also
called, homo-polar generators, or unipolar dynamos. They usually
consist of a rotating magnetic disk where electrical current is
passed from the center of the disk to its edge. Small increases in
the motor input power result in large increases of output power,
thus encouraging the idea of an over-unity cross-over point.
Regardless of all of the theory and reasons pro and con, it will be
exciting to see the results of Tewari's forth coming experiments and
videotapes. It appears that all serious research and development
activities in the energy conversion technologies will continue to be
closely monitored and guarded by the existing oil, transportation,
and economics industries.
Serious researchers in these new areas (Meyer, Methernitha, Sweet)
are not allowing "the establishment" to buy them out. At the same
time, there is strong evidence of aggressive suppression. The
German company Becocraft specializing in the development of "new
energy devices" was forcibly shut down and its president quickly
imprisoned on investment fraud charges in a court case that had only
one plaintiff: the Utility Company of Cologne! (Marinov 1992).
All of the investors of Becocraft fought the case to no avail.
Closer to home, the US Patent Office has classified over 3,000
patent devices or applications under the secrecy order, Title 35,
U.S. Code (195 2) Sections 181-188.
Where did that technology go? These patents would be a great place
to start for a new company involved with defense conversion
technologies for environmental use!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusions
"Woe to you, you blind leaders of a hoard of blind, who say:
'This should be done and that should not be left undone.'
You only represent a false teaching and ignore the laws of
Creation." [4]
Page 10
"It has been said that science is man's futile attempt to understand
Nature. While it becomes important to learn, understand, and apply
science in our everyday lives, it is equally important to continue
the pursuit of unraveling the secrets of Nature." (ISNE 1993, from
Forward 1).
If ignorance was a good enough reason to not try, the light bulb
would have never been invented and the Earth would still be flat.
Let us be judged by our work and repeatable results, and not by
hasty words. Ifsome of these works turn out to be not valid: So Be
It; Let it Be Known; and Let's Move Forward with Integrity!
We are all desperately looking for the next big breakthrough in
modern physics to assist us in solving the escalating energy and
environment crises!
Do something to promote and encourage the continuation of these
researchers and these works! If you don't do it, who will? If not
now, when?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
References
[5] 26th IECEC, Proceedings of the 26th IECEC, Volume 4,
pp 329-492, August 1991:
American Nuclear Society,
555 North Kensington Avenue,
La Grange Park, IL 60525,
$275.00.
27th IECEC, Proceedings of the 27th IECEC, Volume,
pp 4.357-4.295, August 1992:
Society of Automotive Engineers,
400 Commonwealth Drive,
Warrendale, PA 15096-0001,
Order No. P-259, $350.00.
28th IECEC, Proceedings of the 28th IECEC, August 1993:
American Chemical Society,
Meetings Department,
1155 Sixteenth Street N.W.,
Washington D.C. 20036,
$310.00.
Adams, R. "The Adams Pulsed Motor Generator Manual,"
Jan. 1993:
Nexus New Times Magazine,
PO Box 30,
Mapleton Qld 4560,
Australia, $50.00.
AERI,
Advanced Energy Research Institute,
14 Devonshire Mews West, (yes, MEWS not News!!)
London W1N 1FP, Great Britain.
AFS,
Academy for Future Sciences,
PO Box FE,
Los Gatos, CA 95031.
Page 11
Coler, H., "The Invention of Hans Coler, Relating to an
Alleged New Source of Power,"
British Intelligence Objectives Sub-Committee
report No. 1043 Item 31, 32 pp, Now Unclassified,
Summer 1946.
(Available from the authors for $5.00)
Cromer, A., "Pathological Science: An Update,"
Skeptical Inquirer, Vol.17, pp 400-407, 1993.
Figgie, H. E. Jr., Bankruptcy 1995: The Coming Collapse of
America and How to Stop It,
Little, Brown and Company, US and Canada, 1992.
GRG, Gravity Research Group, "Electrogravitics Systems: An
Examination of Electrostatic Motion, Dynamic Counterbary,
and Barycentric Control,"
Feb. 1956: Gravity Research Group report GRG-013/56,
Wright Patterson AFB Technical Library,
Catalog No. TL 565 A9,
WPAFB, Ohio 45433.GRI,
Group Research Institute,
PO Box 438,
Nelson, New Zealand.
IASA,
Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin,
4030 Braker Lane W.,Suite 300,
Austin, TX 78759.
INE,
Institute for New Energy,
1304 South College Avenue,
Fort Collins,CO 80524,
$40.00/yr.
ITS,
International Tesla Society,
PO Box 5636,
Colorado Springs, CO80931.
ISNE,
Proceedings of the International Symposium on New Energy,
April 16-18, 1993:
International Association for New Science (IANS),
1304 South College Avenue,
Fort Collins, CO 80524,
(303) 482-3731, $45.00 for both the IANS and INE.
IANS supports the INE.
JPI,
Japan Psychrotronic Institute,
c/o Shiuji Inomata,
Electrotechnical Laboratory,
1-1-4 Umezono,
Tsukuba-shi,
Ibaraki 305, Japan.
Page 12
Langmuir, I., "Pathological Science,"
Physics Today, 42: 36-48, October 1989.
Marinov, S., "Regarding Becocraft - Letter to
Mr. Richard von Weizsacker,
President of the German Federal Republic, 10 October 1992",
Deutsche Physik,
No. 7, East-West Publishers,
Morellenfeldgasse 16,
A-8010 Graz, Austria.
Meyer, S. Water Fuel Cell Technical Brief, July 1991:
Stanley A. Meyer,
3792 (street missing from file!!)
Grove City, OH 43123, $25.00.
"New Energy News",
PO Box 58639,
Salt Lake City, UT 84158-8639:
monthly newsletter free to INE members.
Newman, J., The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman, July 1993:
Joseph Westley Newman,
Route 1, Box 52,
Lucedale, Miss. 39452,
$60.00.
Nieper, H. A., Revolution in Technology, Medicine and
Society, MIT Verlag, Germany, 1984 (In English):
Tesla Book Company,
PO Box 121873,
Chula Vista, CA 91912,
$27.00.
SEA,
Space Energy Association,
PO Box 11422,
Clearwater, FL 34616.
Seike, S., The Principles of Ultra Relativity, 11th Ed.,
1992:
Space Research Institute,
Box 33,
Uwajima, Ehime (798), Japan,
$70.00.
Storms, E., "The Status of 'Cold Fusion'," 28th IECEC paper,
August 1993.
TI,
Tesla Incorporated,
820 Bridger Circle,
Craig, CO 81625.
USP,
Univ. of Science and Philosophy,
Swannanoa Place,
Box 520,
Waynesboro, VA 22980.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 13
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge these and many other researchers,
scientists, and skeptics that have contributed serious open research
and documentation to boldly advance science and technology for the
benefit of the human race.
Footnotes :
1. Poltergeist, Screenplay to the MGM/UA film production and
VHS videotape, 1987.
2. Heinlein, Robert A., Stranger in a Strange Land, Berkley
Books, 1982.
3. Crichton, Michael, Jurassic Park, Ballantine Books, 1990.
4. Rashid, Isa; Meier, Eduard. The Talmud of Jmmanuel, 24:29-
30, 1990: Wild Flower Press, PO Box 230893, Tigard, Oregon,
97224, $17.20.5. Complete addresses and total prices are
given.
-------------------------------------------------------
This Paper Was Presented and Published at the:
28th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference
August 8-13, 1993, in Atlanta, GA.
Proceedings Pages 2.905-2.910.
The Proceedings of the Conference are Available:
ISBN 0-8412-2772-5
[See "28th IECEC" in the References]
The paper was also recently published in the New Energy News,
Vol. 1, No. 6, October 1993.[See "INE" and "IANS" in the
References]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 14
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/ff.asc
+793
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,793 @@
___________________________________________________________________________
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| Sysop : Jerry W. Decker | Voice : (214) 324-8741 |
| Co-Sysop : Ronald Barker | Voice : (214) 242-9346 |
| File Name : FF.ASC | Online Date : 05/22/94 |
| Contributed by : Bert Pool | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 1031 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75149 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is a compilation of messages regarding electrical energy, the
TOD circuit, Bert Pool's FIREFLY circuit and other related material. The
file continues as FF1.ASC, etc. as the messages grow.
===========================================================================
Message 4141 DATE/TIME: 01/08/94 19:53
From : BERT POOL -- RECEIVED --
To : BILL BEATY
Subject: (R) Time Dialation Experiments
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Bill, your suggestion for using two heterodyning oscillators is a good one.
I may work on just such a device soon. Right now, I am preparing to prove
to myself that electric current actually flows from negative to positive in
an electric circuit, and also to measure the actual speed of propagation of
this current through a copper conductor. I will use a conductor 10,000
feet long to perform this measurement.
Question: If you take a 10,000 ft. long conductor and place an LED at a
position 3,000 ft down the negative lead, one at 5,000 ft. and a third at
7,500 ft., and connect a battery will:
(a) the LEDS will light sequentially, negative to positive
(b) the LEDS will light simultaneously
(c) the LEDS will light sequentially, positive to negative?
The LED's, by the way, are in SERIES so that current has to flow through
all three to return to the battery. The real interesting part of the
experiment will follow this measurement. I calculate that a pulse cannot
take less than 10.17 microseconds to travel the 10,000 ft. path, negative
to positive on the battery. If I connect the battery to the wire for 1
microsecond then disconnect it (i.e., a very short pulse), will the LED
light up for 1 microsecond?
Think carefully! Because by the time the pulse gets to the LED, the
battery is NO LONGER CONNECTED to the battery. If the battery is not
connected to the wire, how can current flow through the LED? I'm
interested in what your guess is on all this, and anyone else's ideas are
welcome as well.
===========================================================================
Message 4164 DATE/TIME: 01/09/94 16:30
From : BILL BEATY -- RECEIVED --
To : BERT POOL
Subject: (R) Time Dialation Experiments
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Re: Speed of electricity.
I must apologize for being longwinded in the following, but you've got me
started!
.
When I had to design a museum exhibit on electricitiy physics, I had to re-
teach myself how electricity really works, having been mis-educated by
misconception-ridden american textbooks. It turns out batteries and
Page 1
generators do not supply electricity, they merely pump it.
All wires, in fact all metals, are already full of electricity. You may
recall from some science class that metals contain a "sea of electrons."
This "sea" is what moves when electric current exists in a wire. This fact
is of prime importance when one is thinking about what goes on in circuits.
Also, electron flows happen very very slowly, on the order of inches per
hour depending on the current.
In an AC system, the electrons sit in place and wiggle, and do not flow
forward at all. So, it's not the ELECTRICITY which travels fast within
wires, it's the WAVES of starting and stopping that move fast, it's the
energy which moves fast.
Electrical energy flows and electrical signals are longitudinal waves of
electron compression and rarefaction supported by electrostatic repulsion
between masses of electrons confined within a wire.
.
Now on to your experiment: If you suddenly connect BOTH leads of a battery
to a very long circle of wire hanging in air, the battery will pull
electrons into its positive terminal while it also pushes electrons out its
negative one. This sends a speed-of-light wave out both terminals of the
battery. The wave is a compression wave on the negative terminal, and a
rarefaction wave on the positive.
As these waves get to successive LEDs in the circuit, they will be lit
sequentially. I predict that the 7500-ft LED will light first (it's only
2500ft. from the end), followed by the 3000-ft LED, followed by the 5000ft
one.
.
What happens if you remove the battery before the wave gets to the LEDs?
I predict that removing the battery will send a second wave of ceasing-of-
motion out thru the wire, and the LEDs will darken in the same sequence in
which they were lit. Connecting the battery for 1.0 uSec will send a 1.0
uSec pulse to the LEDs. I'm envisioning an acoustic analogy here.
If you shout down a very long hose, then suddenly remove your mouth, the
sound that's already in the hose will keep going to the end whether your
mouth is there or not.
.
One thing to think about: if you do the experiment on a wire spool rather
than on an immense circle of wire, I don't think the waves of compression\
rarefaction will stay on one wire and spiral their way through the entire
length of the coil. Instead, voltage and current in one wire will
inductively and capacatively couple to adjacent wires, and so your signal
wavefronts will skip across the coil and act as if they are moving much
faster than the speed of light. Each turn of the coil acts like a trans-
former winding for all the other turns. You either have to spread your
wire out in a big field, or use coax cable so adjacent turns are shielded.
Also, are you going to switch BOTH battery connections on and off? If you
connect the two terminals to the wire at two different times, your results
would be different.
.
Have you heard about the experiments done in 1902 or so which showed that
the mobile electricity within copper is electrons. Researchers wound a big
spool of wire on a wheel, connected the ends to a meter through sliprings,
spun the wheel a high speeds, then stopped it suddenly.
Page 2
The sudden halt in the wire's motion did not jerk the electricity to as
sudden a stop, and a pulse of current was measured in the meter. It was a
negative current in the direction of the wire's motion. I don't know if
they tried this on many different metals. It is vaguely remenicent of
Searle's original attempt to make a generator by throwing electrons off the
edge of a spinning disk.
.
I must point out that all of the above is based upon my knowledge of
conventional circuit physics. It's never occurred to me to try doing
experiments like these. I'd love to hear what happens. You're aware that
Joe Newman's motor designs are based upon pulses racing around in coils?
It's work like yours which has a chance of showing up anomolies and opening
the door to really interesting lines of research.
===========================================================================
Message 4174 DATE/TIME: 01/10/94 11:14
From : BERT POOL -- RECEIVED --
To : BILL BEATY
Subject: Direction and speed of electrical curren
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Bill, I really appreciate your feedback on the experiment on transmitting
pulses through wire. Discussion like this helps generate new ideas and
experiments. Your discussion definitely adds new questions.
.
On your comment that a battery sends a compression wave OUT the negative
terminal and a rarefacation wave OUT the positive, at the speed of light:
If we place an LED twice as close to the positive terminal as the negative;
lets say this is 6000 ft from negative, 3000 ft from positive, and connect
both terminals of the battery to the wire, which wave will reach the LED
first, the compression or the rarefaction? Since BOTH waves are traveling
at 'c', it is obvious that the rarefaction wave from the positive pole will
"pull" electrons through the LED long before the compression wave can
"push" them through.
.
The LED should be lit by the rarefaction wave several microseconds before
the compression wave gets there. In fact, using this analogy, the LED
should light up TWICE - once when the rarefaction wave "pulls" electrons
through the LED and a second time when the compression wave "pushes" more
electrons through the LED. Normally these two events would be so close
together that the phenomenon would never be seen - unless you were looking
for it! (and believe me, I intend to look!).
.
Using your water hose analogy, if we take a long garden hose and at the 2/3
length position place a "paddle" wheel to indicate air movement and have
one person blow on the long end (compression) and another suck on the short
end of the hose (rarefaction), the paddle wheel should move twice. The
rarefaction wave will reach the paddle wheel first, moving it, and
logically, a short time later the compression wave will move the wheel
again.
.
That is, of course, unless the rarefaction wave, upon passing the paddle
wheel, reaches the compression wave at the MIDDLE of the hose, and cancels
it. (Both waves are traveling at the same speed and so should meet at the
middle point of the hose. Compression and rarefaction waves DO cancel,
yes?). Since the paddle wheel was moved by the rarefaction wave long
before the compression wave could ever have arrived, the short length of
time measured for the wheel to move could be wrongly (?) interpreted as
showing that electric current travels from positive to negative.
.
Page 3
This scenario suggests that if we take two 5000 ft conductors and place an
LED at the far end (middle), and place another two LEDs, one at each of the
2500 ft marks and connect a battery, a compression wave will travel from
the negative pole of the battery toward the LED on the negative wire while
a rarefaction wave travels from the positive pole of the battery toward the
LED on the positive wire. Since both waves are traveling at the same
speed, both of these LEDs should light up AT THE SAME TIME, the negative
LED when the compression wave pushes electrons through it, and the positive
LED when the rarefaction wave pulls electrons through it! And a short time
later BOTH waves will reach the middle LED and light it up last.
.
So, looking at the gargen hose and wire and using your classical theory,
I'm still not sure what will REALLY happen. We can put forth at least two
or three conflicting lighting hypothesis based on the same theory.
.
Will the LED's pulse only once or will they pulse twice? Will there be a
sequential lighting, and if so, in what order? Or might some of the LEDs
light simultaneously? I had no idea at the outset that such a simple
experiment could be SO MUCH FUN!
I am prepared to do this experiment tomorrow, but I'm not about to actually
do it until I get more pre-experiment guesses from you and the other Keely
Netters. I'd have never thought about a rarefaction wave lighting up an LED
before a compression wave getting there - thanks.
.
By the way Bill, you are certainly invited to participate in performing
this experiment (hope you are local!).
.
The wire will not be on a spool when the experiment is conducted - self
inductance and capacitance would skew the measurements. I plan on doing
this out in the country in some deserted field where I can unreel 10,000
feet of wire into large loops with as little self capacitance and
inductance as possible.
.
Anyone got a farm field with nearby power that we can use? (no Norm, we
don't want to do this experiment in the Arkansas outback!)
.
Please re-read all our messages on this, ruminate a while, and get back
with me later. >> Bert
.
p.s. - anyone else out there got any feedback on this simple experiment?
It may be simple, but there are some very important electric foundation
pillars being pushed and pulled around here!
.
p.p.s. Jerry, this discussion is starting to look like "file" material,
yes?
cc: Norman Wootan
===========================================================================
Message 4187 DATE/TIME: 01/10/94 16:52
From : BERT POOL -- RECEIVED --
To : BILL BEATY
Subject: Cease-of-motion wave???
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Bill, I re-read your comments:
.
BB > What happens if you remove the battery before the
BB > wave gets to the LEDs?
Page 4
BB > I predict that removing the battery will send a second
BB > wave of ceasing-of-motion out thru the wire, and the LEDs
BB > will darken in the same sequence in which they were lit.
BB > Connecting the battery for 1.0 uSec will send a 1.0 uSec
BB > pulse to the LEDs. I'm envisioning an acoustic analogy
BB > here. If you shout down a very long hose, then suddenly
BB > remove your mouth, the sound that's already in the hose
BB > will keep going to the end whether your mouth is there or not.
.
Bill, what in the heck is a "ceasing-of-motion" wave? I know this is the
"New Age", so maybe this is a Wave of the New Age? |:)
.
I was able to hang in there with you except for this. Maybe a
clarification? >> Bert
===========================================================================
Message 4226 DATE/TIME: 01/12/94 10:27
From : BILL BEATY -- RECEIVED --
To : BERT POOL
Subject: (R) Direction and speed of electrical cu
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Sounds like your analogy with the hose and paddle wheels is just about what
I am visualizing for the workings of your experiment.
One detail:
.
> That is, of course, unless the rarefaction wave, upon passing
> the paddle wheel, reaches the compression wave at the MIDDLE of
> the hose, and cancels it. (Both waves are traveling at the same
> speed and so should meet at the middle point of the hose.
> Compression and rarefaction waves DO cancel, yes?).
.
On the above, I would say that the compression and rarefaction waves would
meet and cancel MOMENTARILY, but would then continue moving and go through
each other and continue unaffected. I've seen this happen with water
ripples. I've even made it happen myself when playing with pulses on
hanging ropes and swinging chains. It's only when the medium is
"nonlinear" that one wave can alter the path of another wave's energy. In
linear media, waves go through each other and come out unaffected.
.
Oh, here's another thing I though of. The resistance of a power supply is
very low, so you treat it as a conductor. So, if you should connect the
battery to the long loop of wire AND LEAVE IT CONNECTED, the waves of
compression and rarefaction should go all the way around the loop, return,
and PASS THROUGH THE BATTERY and go around again. The LEDs should change
brightness many times in a resonant exponential decay, as smaller and
smaller positive and negative current waves go past them. The current
waves would continue forever, but I think the resistance of the LEDs and of
the wire will make them die off after a few trips. If the wire resistance
is high enough, the waves might even be smeared out after a single trip.
Something to watch out for.
.
And even if you disconnect the battery a microsecond after sending the
pulses, you will still get multiple pulses at the LEDs because the missing
battery acts as a mismatched impedance on your line, which causes total
reflection of any waves hitting the end of the wire. The waves will return
to the battery, find it missing, and so reverse course and make trips
around the loop again backwards.
.
Wasn't there some free-energy invention which used very long lengths of
Page 5
wire lying on the ground? I think it was powered by a tesla coil, but even
so, you might get some weird results if your experiment interacts in any
way with telluric currents, AC or DC. You might discover something
interesting. Wouldn't it be great if you could accidentally tap a few
kilowatts from the ether and blow up your LEDs? Or you might discover that
you have to invest in 10000 feet of coaxial cable to get rid of earth
current signals.
.
Also, I wonder if Bearden's "Final Secret" stuff involves some
instantaneous propagation effects, followed by normal light speed effects.
The thing where he connects a voltage to an inductor and then removes it
before current starts, doesn't quite make sense if the starting of the
current propagates as a lightspeed wave. Connecting a battery to an
inductor, for even a brief moment, should in theory send a pulse down the
wire of the coil. But if instead there was some INSTANTANEOUS wave (of
electrogravity?) which filled the whole wire, it might alter the wire and
make it suck ZPE. If this happens, you should see some waves on your wire
which go much faster than the speed of light. Something to watch for!
.
I wonder what happens when you first connect one battery terminal to the
wire loop, THEN connect the other one? The wire will first be suddenly
charged up to the voltage of the battery terminal. As this voltage wave
passes each LED, if it is high enough, it might make the LED pulse very
breifly. This would be weird: flashing the LEDs with only ONE battery
terminal connected. I don't know if the other battery terminal has to be
connected to earth for this to happen, since it is an electrostatic effect.
You also might have to momentarily ground your long wire first, to make
sure it's at 0 volts.
.
>By the way Bill, you are certainly invited to participate in
>performing this experiment (hope you are local!).
.
Sorry, I'm not local, I'm Seattle, WA. We used to have a fringe
science/UFO/Magik/etc. group here a couple of years ago, called "The
Group," but it ran out of steam when the person volunteering his home for
meetings moved out of travel range. There still is Dale Travous here with
his 9 ft. multi 10-KW tesla coil, and Gary Hawkins, who's 30KV capacitor
bank penny-blasting was featured in EXTRAORDINARY SCIENCES last month.
===========================================================================
Message 4227 DATE/TIME: 01/12/94 10:29
From : BILL BEATY -- RECEIVED --
To : BERT POOL
Subject: (R) Cease-of-motion wave???
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>Bill, what in the heck is a "ceasing-of-motion" wave? I know this
>is the "New Age", so maybe this is a Wave of the New Age? |:)
.
Yes, Glasshoppah, when ceasing-of-motion wave propagate to the everpresent
"now" of one's position on the worldline, one begins to smell and is in
need of being discarded.
.
Sorry ;)
.
That "ceasing of motion" thing is something I started saying because, when
explaining electricity to people, I found that most everyone uses the word
"current" to describe what flows in wires, rather than calling it
"electricity" or "charge" or electrons.
Page 6
"Current" cannot flow if current IS a flow of something. In my older
message I almost said that a wave of "current" was going down the wire, but
because of the blurry meaning of the word, I instead tried to say it more
accurately.
When you connect a battery to a circuit and wait a while, the whole circuit
ends up with flowing charge. How did that charge start flowing? Well, when
the wires first touched together, a wave of "starting-of-motion" zipped all
around the circuit, leaving constantly flowing electrons in its wake. Now,
when you break a closed circuit, THE ELECTRONS STOP WHERE THEY ARE.
And they do the "stopping" one after another in sequence. And so a wave of
motionlessness, or a wave of zero current, or a wave of ceasing-of-motion
of electrons, overtakes each one in the circuit at the speed of light,
leaving a lot of motionless electrons at the end. In your experiment with
the long wire, the compression and rarefaction waves aren't simply pulses
of breif movement, because in front of the waves the electrons are stopped,
and behind the waves the electrons are moving. The waves are leading edges
of a spreading area of movement of charges.
===========================================================================
Message 4287 DATE/TIME: 01/14/94 20:45
From : BILL BEATY
To : ALL
Subject: Audio phase conj.
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
I don't think it's that easy to build an acoustic phase-congugate mirror.
Don't these devices always require some sort of time-reversal, also some
way of recording a two-dimensional pattern? The simplest way I can think
of doing an acoustic version is this: Put a few hundred tiny loudspeakers
and microphones in a large grid pattern with one speaker adjacent to each
mic. Wire the mics to the inputs of a supertaperecorder having several
hundred channels. Now record some distant sounds. If you now play the tape
back in reverse so the sound comes out of the speakers backwards and
amplified, the waveforms and phases of the sounds coming from the speakers
will be such that the grid of speakers will direct powerful beams of sound
out to each original source. Even with many separate sound sources, the
device will simultaneously send a beam to each one.
.
Here's another idea: line a harbor with numerous individual high-speed
water level sensors, and also numerous wave generators (maybe piston-driven
panels or something) Now make a splash at some particular place in the
harbor, and record the waves received on shore. If you now play back the
received signals into the wave generators, and play them in reverse, you
create a time-reversed contracting ripple pattern that shrinks down into a
splash. And with a little amplification and processing, you could direct
huge splashs to any point in the harbor. I've always wanted to do this
in a science museum duck pond, then let people handle the controls of the
timereversed phasecongugate hydralic wave duck dunker!
===========================================================================
Message 4294 DATE/TIME: 01/15/94 02:31
From : BILL BEATY -- RECEIVED --
To : WILLIAM ALLEN
Subject: (R) artificial scm
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
On the "artificial superconductor" coil:
.
I came up with my device while wondering how to fake a superconductor
Page 7
levitation effect for a museum exhibit. You probably know that a
superconductor can levitate permanent magnets by excluding their fields via
closed current loops on the surface of the material. What suddenly
appeared in my brain was a picture of a matrix of electromagnet coils, each
with a hall-effect magnetic field sensor in the center, and each driven by
a power amplifier getting its signal from the sensor. This setup does
nothing, since the sensors detect any field from the coils and force them
to turn off.
BUT, if a magnet approaches the matrix of coils, the sensors will turn on
the coils just enough to force the field at the sensors to be zero. This
is just what a superconductor plate does! And the coils do repel the
magnet. Regardless of which pole of the magnet approaches the coil, the
sensor sends a current which forces the coil and magnet to repel.
.
Building this device is easier than it sounds. First try making a single
"repulsor" coil as shown below. You use a switching-type bipolar hall
effect sensor, a PNP and an NPN power darlington transistor, and a coil
taken from a solenoid. I used 1/4-20 bolts for the iron core of my
coils. The coil was for a 12V solenoid, and I drove it with + and - 24Vdc
supplies. I got the transistors from DIGI-KEY electronic mail order, and
the SS41 from R&D Electronic surplus catalog.
.
+Power
\
/ +Power
22K \ /
GND __________ / / SS41
| | \ |/ ZTX603 goes here
| / | | |
| \100K *----*---| |
| / | | | CORE V
Micro- | \ / | |\ | ================
Switch _|_ | |/ | __\| ================
SS41 | | | | | \ _ _ _
| |-----*---| | | / \ / \ / \
|___| | | | | || || |
| |\ | | |_____\_/__\_/__\_/__
| __\| | | COIL |
-Power \ | | (fm 24V Solnoid.) |
| | | / |
| | |/__ |
| | |/ GND
| | |
| *---| ZTX705
| |
| |\
-Power \
\
-Power
.
Get the circuit operating, place the SS41 Hall-Effect sensor against the
end of the coil's iron core, then bring a bar magnet near the end of the
core and see if it repels. If not, turn the SS41 over to reverse it's
output polarity. Attach the SS41 to the core (I used cable ties and
silicone)
.
This is one repulsor coil. It acts like a bar magnet which repels either
end of another magnet! With five I managed to levitate a 3" alnico rod
Page 8
magnet VERY wobbly and temporary. With two rows of six coils attached to
iron strips, I made a slanted track which bar magnets would zip silently
along. This circuit is too simple and has no adjustments, and it is
underdamped, so levitated magnets tend to wobble. Copper damping plates
(pennys) held near the levitated magnet can cure this, but it's a cludgey
fix. I have yet to build a square panel and attempt to float a big magnet.
.
If you build any of the above, try connecting an audio amp to the DC power
lines. Each repulsor circuit is an inheirant switching power supply, and
the chorus of variable frequency whining sounds from the coils is pretty
cool.
.
On capacitor discharge: leave messages for Gary Hawkins on this board. He
is working with 30kV oil capacitors with discharge energies like a shotgun
blast. Ask him about samples of the pennies and quarters he shrunk by
compressing them with the field of an exploding coil.
cc: Jerry Decker
===========================================================================
Message 4311 DATE/TIME: 01/15/94 15:31
From : BILL BEATY -- RECEIVED --
To : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
Subject: Keely motor
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
THROUGH THE CURTAIN by Viola Neal & Shafica Karagulia / DeVorss & Co,
Marina del Ray, CA, (c)1983
.
This is a book on particular dreams some people had in the early '60s,
where in the dream the person attended some sort of class and had various
things explained to them.
.
In the Technology part of the book, the "teachers" say many times that
sound is extremely important to physics, psychic phenomena, and to the
structure of the universe. Also, the following two paragraphs suddenly
appear. No other mention of motors or of "K" appear anywhere else
as far as I can see.
.
From p172:
"Concentrating on a particular geometrical form first at his
throat center, then at a point in the brain, made it possible
to start the "K" motor. The motor itself required a certain
type of construction which was no secret, but once he had
started it by this method it continued to operate until he had
shut it off, either by mechanical means or again by focusing
on certain geometrical forms in his brain. "K" happened on
this through experimentation. He knew it was dangerous to give
it to people and never said how he did it."
.
From p180:
"The secret of the "K" motor was a crystalline form that was
used and no one knew. It was under everybody's nose, but no one
felt a crystal had an effect on a motor. "K" found out that just
by visualizing the geometrical form of the crystal, he could get
the motor to start. But there were crystals in the mechanism of
the motor. Simpler devices than "K's" motor could be made. A
simple combination of magnets and crystals could give you all
Page 9
the energy you need to run a house."
.
So, who could the mysterious "K" be??!
===========================================================================
Message 4479 DATE/TIME: 01/22/94 11:47
From : NORMAN WOOTAN -- RECEIVED --
To : GERALD O'DOCHARTY
Subject: Capacitor Discharges
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Gerald: You are probably already aware of what I am going to say so don't
take offense for it is meant for the folks out there who don't really
understand WATTS, KILLOWATTS or KILOWATT/HOURS. Remember that Tesla said
that a capacitor is an amazing device for it allowed us the flexibility to
store high voltage energy and release it at any time interval that we
deamed oppropriate for our application. Let's look at an example.
I have a bank of Energy Storage Capacitors that came from Oak Ridge, DOE
made by Sangamo Electric. They are 12"x 12" x 30" in size and weigh 200#
each. They are rated at 3000 JOULES @ 60,000 volts. I have a bank of them
numbering 60 each which gives a total capacity of 180,000 JOULES. Now if I
discharge this bank in 1 second @60 KV it would yield a current of 3 amps.
What we are all familiar with is the electric meter which is watt/hours so
this bank of capacitors would yield 50watt/hours,but if I discharge it in 1
millisecond the yield would be 180 MEGAWATTS. Then if I were able to
discharge it in 1 microsecond then the pulse would be 1.8 GIGAWATTS.
The problem is in the fact that the whole bank would explode and devistate
everthing arround it. We can't get conductors big enough to handle the
currents associated with an instantaneous discharge of this magnitude. The
bottom line of the discussion is that power is based on time and the
capacitor allows us to compress a lot of power in a short time frame. Be
careful and good luck. Norm
===========================================================================
Message 4490 DATE/TIME: 01/23/94 01:25
From : WILLIAM ALLEN
To : ALL
Subject: COILBAK RESPONSE FROM CHAD PRYSON
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
I HAVE BEEN SENDING FILES AND WORKING WITH CHAD PRYSON. WE WORKED TOGETHER
IN KNOXVILLE, TN, AND THEN I MOVED TO TEXAS... DUE TO THE LONG DISTANCE
CALLS, HE DOESN'T CALL OFTEN, SO HE SENT THIS TO ME FOR UPLOAD TO
KEELYNET....... HE HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THE HENDERSHOT GENERATOR FOR SOME
TIME, AND HAS WOUND A BEAUTIFUL PAIR OF BASKET COILS AND HAS BECOME EXPERT
AT MAKING THE CAPACITORS CALLED FOR IN THE TEXT. ALAS, THE DEVICE STILL
DOES NOT PUT OUT ANY POWER. CHAD DOES THE BEST LOOKING ASSEMBLY WORK I HAVE
SEEN, AND IS A VERY GOOD TECHNICIAN. HE UMPED AT THE COILBAK AS AN IDEA,
AND IMMEDIATELY TRIED HIS HAND AT THE CIRCUIT. FOLLOWING ARE HIS RESPONCES:
**********************************************************
To KeelyNet
Jan. 3rd, 1994
RE: Coilbak circuit submitted by Joel McClain
As I have experimented with the Coilbak circuit, I have
Page 10
obtained no favorable results as yet. I would like to
point out two critical factors in the circuit design:
1.) Regardless of where the comparator reference voltage
is set, the SCR has been triggered and will not turn
off by any subsequent action of the gate voltage from
the comparator output.
Since the SCR is conducting, the sawtooth ramp will
continue to maintain bias on the SCR anode, ensuring
that it will conduct the entire ramp from triggering
to maximum amplitude. There is no way to inhibit the
coil charge cycle at 90 degrees.
2.) Due to the extremely short duration of the sawtooth
"low" state, I have not found an SCR that will respond
to such a short transient and reset before the next
ramp begins. The only exception to this is pulling the
sawtooth waveform below ground by using a negative
supply in addition to the positive battery supply.
This, of course, tends to negate the entire purpose of
the circuit since that supply cannot be replenished.
This has been my experience to date. I am normally not a
skeptic regarding such matters, (I always hope everyone has
altruistic intentions) but something seems to be missing
or incorrect.
Have I missed something?
Sincerely,
Chad Pryson
3708 Douglas Dam Rd.
Kodak, TN 37764
615-933-8025
===========================================================================
Message 4491 DATE/TIME: 01/23/94 01:32
From : WILLIAM ALLEN -- PRIVATE -- -- RECEIVED --
To : JOEL MCCLAIN
Subject: CHAD
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
JOEL, MY FRIEND CHAD PRYSON HAS SENT ME A RESPONSE TO LOAD TO THE NET
CONCERNING COILBAK. THIS NOTE IS TO LET YOU KNOW TO GET THE FIRE
EXTINGUISHER READY. FLAME ON! HE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY REPLY, PERHAPS ALONG
WITH YOUR RESULTS. MESSAGE #4490 IS MY PRELUDE AND HIS LETTER... THANKS.
WILLIAM ALLEN
P.S.... NO OFFENSE OF COURSE! ALL IN THE INTEREST OF F.E. FOR ALL!
===========================================================================
Message 4538 DATE/TIME: 01/24/94 23:16
From : BOB ALDRICH -- RECEIVED --
To : TERRY BASTIAN
Subject: (R) efficient batteries
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Terry,
Page 11
Ok, here's the scoop on this liquid electricity. The man I know who told
me is getting older, and so couldn't recall all that I remembered, but he
did come up with some more details.
He couldn't recall the man's name, but he is known in the midwest for
his invention that waters farms, sort of a very high-powered water pistol..
It irrigates a farm with one nozzle... it shoots water half a mile or more!
He almost recalle the name, but not quite, but said it rhymes with stag or
stap or something.. He said that someone else did some experiments along
the same lines, that he copied what this man did, and that this other man
disappeared. Whether he left suddenly or mysteriously or just moved away,
or was abducted is not known.
This man did say that the liquid electricity battery was doubly enclosed
(possibly for insulation from heat) and that it was charged for several
hours at a very high voltage and it eventually got extremely heavy. If you
shook it the electricity sloshed around inside.
He had built a small model, cooled by helium (although I thought my
friend said nitrogen last time) that, if scaled up, per his calculations to
a cubic foot, WOULD CONTAIN ENOUGH ENERGY TO LIGHT NEW YORK CITY FOR A
WEEK. Also that this cubic foot of electricity WOULD WEIGH ABOUT TWO TONS.
There is another such device, a different researcher, somewhere in
Washington or Oregon possibly, who has something similar called the Trinium
battery. Don't know if it's exactly the same thing, but if you want I could
trace this down also.
AND, here is another one.
Another type of battery was designed by a fellow named Joe Wallace of
Phoenix, Arizona in the mid-fifties. This battery was TWO CUBIC INCHES, yet
was comparable to the lead-acid car battery we know. And it would draw
higher current. My friend saw one the size of a penny (single cell) that
would produce hundreds of amps at 1-1.5 volts!
It was SILVER BASED; the electrolyte may have been silver chloride. One
terminal was a paste and the other terminal was a solid terminal. There may
be a way to trace this fellow down. However, some of the technology may be
defense related, as Amphenol allowed him to demonstrate his battery to them
(how nice of them) but they didn't want to buy his design, as they had a
similar design which didn't work as well but was adequate for their use,
which was used in the detonation of the Atomic Bomb!
All for now!
Bob
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
KeelyNet (214) 324-3501 is a FREE Alternative Sciences BBS
Your file contributions and financial support are much appreciated!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 12

bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/ff1.asc
+1057
View File
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/flan1.asc
+792
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,792 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
September 9, 1993
FLAN1.ASC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of William Bethel & Jim Shaffer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is a compilation of comments from the CompuServe (CIS) New Age
Forum - Moderated by Alain Beaulieu and sent to KeelyNet by William Bethel.
The file has been edited to eliminate redundancy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
#: 113828 S9/New Age Sciences
04-Aug-93 00:25:15
Sb: Neurophone1
Fm: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 70403,3645
To: Patrick Flanagan 71650,60 (X)
Here a repost of messages about the neurophone. Dr. Flanagan has given me the
permission to re-echo some of the messages that we had in E-mail. I re-edited
them slightly to keep only the "good stuff":
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Dr. Flanagan,
I have started to read the files that your uploaded in the library and of
course, I have some questions. I figure that many other people also have
questions but just don't dare to start. <g> By the way, before to go further,
I have noticed that your replies appeared to be the start of new topics in
the forum. This would tend to indicate to me that you are composing your
messages on-line and that is a costly way to do things. If you don't have
one of the navigation software, download the file AUTOP.INF in library #1. It
describes the different software to read and write messages off-line. If you
already have one, then you're in business and can disregard this paragraph!
You say that the art of production of a true neurophone was not contained in
your patents. The first thing that comes to my mind is that if you found the
effect with simple circuitry, then reproducing one should be relatively easy
(although it would not produce optimal results). Is that a safe assumption?
You also say that you were able to stimulate visual phenomena when the
electrodes were placed over the occipital region of the brain. Where these
phenomena simple light spots, shades, or something else? Did you notice what
changed their forms or colors (maybe types of modulation?)
Re: Dr. Coanda. Is there any truth to the rumor that he would have found a
way to reproduce the aerodynamic flow of flying saucers (i.e. no sonic
bangs at supersonic speeds)?
About dolphin research, there is one member overhere who is involved in that
too. He is mostly looking at EEG and got hold of one of your neurophone a few
Page 1
months ago. His name is David Cole [70515,1161].
>>encoding mechanism used by human to decode speech intel patterns...
mechanism used by brain to locate sound source in 3-D space... holographic
sound system<<
This sounds interesting. Can you tell me more about it (in addition to the
fact that it acts like a Whitehouse coorelator with time encoded ratios)?
Does it have anything to do with the 44 bit code of Lisitsyn (sp?) that Tom
Bearden is pointing at? Do you know of any reference describing these
mechanisms?
>>man-dolphin translator<<
You say that when the dolphins whistled, the speakers output human speech
sounds and you developed a joint language. I guess that once both parties
can interact, you can expect a language to develop for things for which
none of you had names before. But can you tell us what this dolphin-human
sound sounded like, and also to what foreign language did your dolphin
language sounded the most alike?
>>digital neurophone... never published algorithms...<<
Do you intend to publish it one day?
>>Vidiophone in the future<<
Near or long future? That would certainly be impressive. In the mean time,
it seems that not too many people have heard of the neurophone. Are they
still manufactured and sold? If yes, would you mind pointing us to a
source? Also, in these days of walkman, subliminal tapes and machines, why
did the neurophone never take off? (too expensive? simpler to use a normal
tape recorder? Else?)
What are your opinions regarding holographic brain theories? I have read the
book "The Holographic Universe" by Michael Talbot and it seems to me that
holographic approaches are the most promissing leads to understanding the
keys of the universe. It is probably why David Bohm had such an affinity for
them! And last (for now!), I was impressed with the fact that you were able
to transmit clear voice over 1000 miles using mW power. Can you tell me more
on how that was done and where I could find information on that? It has some
similarity with electromagnetic missile (also called EDEPT) and their
acoustic cousins called ADEPT which are ways to direct energy and were the
results of research done on SDI and published in IEEE magazines.
Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1993-August-1 19:54 - TO: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 - FM: Patrick Flanagan
1. Thank you for the info on navigation software, I currently use CIM and
have ordered WINCIM.
2. Neurophone & Visual Phenomena: The visual phenomena consisted of wavy
lines and phospene type phenomena. W Grey Walter in his book: "The Living
Brain" states that certain clues indicate that the scanning mechanism in
the brain is in a spiral pattern. Therefore any attempt to stimulate
coherent imaging will have to have a spiral scan rather than the
horizontal X-Y system used by television. We have used some various
methods of generating Circular Polarized Neurophone signals with some very
interesting results. Unfortunately the Neurophone would require a really
large research budget to really investigate these phenomena.
3. Dr. Henrie Marie Coanda had over 500 patents but most of the data about
the actual curves of the Coanda devices was trade secret. He taught me the
math that he used in the devices. I witnessed a torpedo traveling at
speeds of 100 MPH under water. These torpedoes created no wake or pressure
Page 2
waves but were "sucked" through the water by means of the Coanda Effect.
In 1918, Dr. Coanda built a saucer that was 12" in diameter. This saucer
was able to lift an 800 pound Nitrogen tank off the ground. The lift to
surface area ratio was outstanding. His work may have been picked up by
the Nazi's but Coanda did not work with them. He was arrested in Paris by
the Gestapo when they found out that he was drinking coffee. Since the
only coffee was available by Black Market, they thought he was a spy. They
refused to go into his green house where he grew coffee. He was eventually
release when they "lost" his file by means of bribery.
4. The Man-Dolphin translator was able to translate English or any other
language into whistles. The Dolphins then imitated the whistles and the
translator would put out perfect English or whatever. We were able to come
up with a 35 word vocabulary before the project was disbanded due to the
death of my partner, Dr. Dwight Wayne Batteau, the head of the project.
Before then end of the project, the dolphins were able to create simple
sentences on their own. This should not be surprising because Apes are
taught to communicate by sign language. Dolphins and whales are much
smarter than apes.
5. The Algorithm of the Neurophone is based on the time- ratio encoding that
is used by all of nature. Time-ratio encoding is independent of frequency.
That is what is wrong with the vocoder. It depends on frequency. A child
has a much smaller vocal cavity than an adult, the frequency of its voice
is much different but we can understand what children say because speech
is time ratio encoded. Ratio encoding is used throughout nature for
example Euler's number 2.718..., PHI 1.6180339889, etc. These ratios have
meaning. The visual system recognizes ratio encoding for object
identification and the hearing system uses time- ratios between wave form
events. As far as I know, no one else has ever used time-ratio encoding.
The original Dolphin translators and Neurophones used discreet components.
Today, a computer can perform all kinds of mathematical algorithms on wave
forms. A NEW Neurophone will use these capabilities. I hope to get one out
early next year. We produced several thousand Neurophones that sold for
$1000 to $1500. My goal is to manufacture a really slick one that will be
like a Sony Walkman and will sell for a few hundred dollars, but the money
required set up production will be pretty high.
6. The Neurophone proves that the brain is holographic. The other theory is
that the brain is hard-wired. If the brain was hard-wired, the Neurophone
would not work by alternate neural pathways. We have shown that we can
hear through the optic nerve, the facial nerve and the trigeminal nerve.
7. The MW power transmission over 1000 miles was by means of using my
time-ratio encoding to produce a narrow bandwidth transmitter. Distance at
low power is a signal to noise ratio problem. By narrowing bandwidth,
distance is increased because the ratio is improved.
8. ADEPT and EDEPT: I would like to know how I can get copies of that data. I
was not familiar with it. I also worked on Scalar wave communications and
built scalar wave transmitters and receivers. We were able to transmit
intelligence over several miles under water and through the earth. The
original ideas came from Wallace Minto in a system he called Hydronic
Radiation.
Kindest regards, Patrick Flanagan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
04-Aug-93 00:26:08 - Fm: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 - To: Patrick Flanagan
Here's the continuation:
Thank you very much for your reply. However, I am sure that many lurkers
(bystanders) were looking forward to your reply too. Unless you had specific
areas that you want to keep confidential, your reply would be much more
useful if it was made public (but addressed to me) in the New Age Science
section. Here are further questions that I intend to repost in the NAF (New
Age Forum) once you repost your answer overthere.
Page 3
>> spiral scan of brain <<
Has its scanning period been identified?
>> would require a really large research budget to really investigate these
phenomena. >>
Of course, but would it not be easier today now that you can build almost
everything in a programmable way?
>> The data that you have on Dr. Coanda is impressive: 12" diam capable of
lifting 800 lbs! Wow! When you say that his curves were trade secrets, do
you mean that he died with it or was it transfered to some corporation or
government? What was special about the math that he used?
>> dolphin-language<< OK. I see. It is somewhat similar to what they did to
teach sign language to chimpanzes, but in acoustic.
>> Ratio encoding is used throughout nature for example Euler's number
>> 2.718..., PHI 1.6180339889, etc. These ratios have meaning.
So those ratios would be used and reused to encode the signals, like a
sort of chaos encoding?
>> We produced several thousand Neurophones that sold for $1000 to $1500. It
is amazing that you succeeded to sell thousands at that price! It is
rather hefty for the typical consumer. I agree that a few hundred dollars
would make it more palatable (and you could also use the fact that it
won't disturb your neighbors as much as Walkman's earphones playing loud
music inside a bus!)
>> money required set up production will be pretty high.
It depends on the complexity of the device but I would think that if they
can crank out walman's type of devices and still be profitable, that
should not be a major problem. You could likely find many electronic
manufacturers just looking for something else to do of their spare
manufacturing capability.
>> Neurophone proves that the brain is holographic. Tom Bearden says that the
brain is holographic but his main argument is that someone who was
hydrocephalic obtained a Mathematical degree, thus IQ is independant of
brain size.
>> mW transmission at 1000 miles<< Yet, for it being transmitted
acoustically, (it was acoustically transmitted, wasn't it?), it is quite
remarkable. Any documentation available on it?
>> ADEPT/EDEPT<< I have a copy of a very illustrated description in some
paper published by the Lawrence Livermore Lab which is less mathematical
than the others. I live in Canada and I don't have American stamps to make
a SASE in order to be on your distribution list. So I will send you a copy
of it in exchange of being on your distribution list. (If that's all right
with you.) However, if you want to get started right away, you can check
out "Localized Wave Representations of Acoustic and Electromagnetic
Radiation" by Ziolkowski, R.W., Besieris, I.M., Shaarawi, A.M. affiliated
with Dept of Elect & Computer Eng, Arizona Univ, Tucson, AZ (I guess
that's relatively close to you!), published in Proceedings of the IEEE,
Vol.79, No.10, Oct 1991, p.1371-1378.
>> I also worked on Scalar wave communications and built scalar wave
>> transmitters and receivers. We were able to transmit intelligence over
>> several miles under water and through the earth. The original ideas came
>> from Wallace Minto in a system he called Hydronic Radiation. >>
I never heard of Wallace Minto. Can you tell me more about him and his
Page 4
Hydronic Radiation? As to scalar wave comm, did you mean the Rogers
communication system or something really scalar like Tom Bearden is
advancing? Also, can you tell me more on how I can find information
(keywords for searches, etc.) on these scalar comm devices?
Also with kindest regards, Alain Beaulieu
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
04-Aug-93 00:27:44 - TO: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 - FM: Patrick Flanagan
Dear Alain:
Thank you for your recent epistle. You can upload these letters to the forum
if you like. Also, I already put you on my mailing list. The same is true of
everyone who has responded. The SASE is to help offset cost but I put
everyone on anyway. I am looking forward to the info on the ADEPT and EDEPT.
The spiral scan frequency of the brain has not been measured to my knowledge,
however the "flicker" persistence of vision known and used by film makers may
be a clue.
1. More Information on time-ratio encoding: Audio Encoding for 3D Sound in
Space (Holo -sound)--------
The brain is able to detect phase differences of 1 microsecond or less.
This was found in our research at Tufts University. The Pinnae or outer
ear is a "phase encoding" array that generates a time-ratio code that is
used by the brain to localize the source of sounds in 3-D space. Some of
the localization time ratios are around one microsecond. A person with one
ear can localize sound sources (non-linear) to a 5 degree angle anywhere
in space. You can test this by closing your eyes and while having a friend
jingle keys in space around your head. With your eyes closed you can
follow the keys and point to them very accurately. If you try this with a
sine wave from a speaker you cannot locate it at all. You can localize
the sine wave if the speaker has a non-linearity or distortion. The brain
will focus on the distorion and use it to meausre time ratios. If you
distort your Pinnae by bending the outer ears out of shape, your ability
to localize the sound source is destroyed. The so-called cocktail party
effect is the ability to localize voices in a noisy party. This is due to
the brain's ability to detect phase differences and then pay attention to
localized areas in 3-D space. A favorite "intelligence" trick is to have
conversations in "hard" rooms with wooden walls and floors. A "bug" will
pick up all the echoes and will scramble the voice. If you put a
microphone in the room with a duplicate of the human pinnae on top of it,
you will be localize the speakers and tune out the echoes - just like you
were at a party. We used metal ears 18" in diameter that were attached to
hydrophones. When these were placed under water, we were able to
accurately localize underwater sounds in 3-D space. We used this system to
localize whales and dolphins. Sound travels 5X as fast under water so we
made the "Pinnae" larger to give the same time encoding as we find in the
air. We also made large plastic ears that were tested in Vietnam. These
ears were of the same proportions as real ears but were larger. They
enabled us to hear distant sounds with a high degree of localization
accuracy in the jungle.
We were also able to take any sound and encode it so that it was perceived
as coming from a specific point in space. Using this technique we could
spread out an orchestra and make you think you were in the concert hall.
As far as I know, this information has never been used commercially except
in one instance when I allowed the Beach Boys to record one of their
albums with my special equipment.
2. Dr. Coanda found that certain curves were better at entraining airflow for
"fluid amplification". His patents gave designs but the actual curve
formulas for maximum efficiency of air entrainment were a secret. He gave
me his formulas. They were given in confidence so I have never thought
Page 5
about revealing them. The curves are everything. The efficiency of his
saucer is an example. Any curving surface will entrain air. The right
curve will entrain 100% of the primary air flow which then captures
secondary flow. This is the secret of fluid amplification and airflow
surface design. The so called Coanda surfaces currently used in jets and
helicopters are really a joke. The curves are not very efficient.
3. IQ. --- In past years, I was involved in the development of a device known
as a Neural Efficiency Amplifier. This device measured the efficiency with
which the brain conducts a light pulse applied to both eyes back to the
optical centers. It was found that IQ is a measure of Neural Efficiency.
This was reflected by phase difference between the left and right
hemispheres of the brain. The high the IQ the less phase difference. We
discovered that the Neurophone usage increased the Neural Efficiency.
4. Wallace Minto was an inventor who worked with scalar waves but did not
know it. He sent me some of his experimental papers. I will dig them out
and share them with you. He may still be around. He was in Florida the
last time heard from him. He is/was a brilliant scientist. He found that
he could transmit "electrical" hydronic waves through water and that the
signal in water was not delayed. The same signal passing through the air
by radio carrier was compared with a signal transmitted through water.
There was no phase difference. Theoretically electrical signals travel
slower in water than they do in the air. With his system there was no
phase difference. Since there was no such thing as scalar back then he
called his signals hydronic waves. He could only generate them in water.
He was able to show that certain kinds of fish send out hydronic signals.
You can identify the species and locate them in the same way you use radio
direction finders. He tried to interest the NAVY but no one would listen
to him so his ideas died away. I duplicated all of his experiments and
went beyond. I discovered the "secret" of the hydronic signal and could
create the signals at any frequency and could also generate and receive
these signals in the air. Minto was only able to generate and detect these
signals in the audio frequency range.
Whether scalar or not, we have detected these signals from the human body.
Each "chakra" oscillates at a different frequency. The body is able to
detect and radiate these signals. The original Neurophone is a scalar
device. It does transmit both EM and Scalar signals but the body is
responding mostly to the scalar component.
Bearden makes things too complex. He is brilliant and his math is
excellent. But he gives no guidelines for experimental work. Generation
and detection of scalar signals is really simple. The antenna designs are
exactly the opposite of antenna that are designed for EM radiation.
Perfect 1:1 standing wave ratio antennas do not generate scalar fields.
The so called mis-matched antennae work great!
By the way, did you know that the angle of the Great Pyramid is such that
the apex is a perfect match to the impedance of free space? The angle of a
horn antenna affects its apex impedance at resonance. By changing the
angle, the matching impedance varies. Back in the early days of radio,
people had to experiment to find the rules of antenna engineering.
Engineers developed geometries that maximize EM radiation and minimize
scalar power. By reversing the process we were able to maximize scalar and
minimize EM.
5. T. Townsend Brown was a friend of mine way back. His "gravitators" and
other anti-gravity devices are scalar antennae. I think that people are
missing the boat on looking at EM effects on the body. The living system
is infinitely more responsive to scalar signals.
That's all for now! Kindest regards, Patrick Flanagan <<>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
04-Aug-93 00:28:45 - Fm: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 - To: Patrick Flanagan
Page 6
>> I am looking forward to the info on the ADEPT and EDEPT. <<
Good! One more copy to do and I'll send it tomorrow, By the way, ADEPT
means Acoustic Directed-Energy Pulse Train, and EDEPT is the same but for
the electromagnetic form.
1. Ear models: interesting. I remember hearing something about Coke or Pepsi
trying to do an ad with a special sound encoding process. Was that this
one? (I'm sure it did not have anythingto do with the Beach Boys). By the
way, do you know which song or album it is the Beach Boys used your device
to record?
>> The so called Coanda surfaces currently used in jets and helicopters
>> are really a joke. The curves are not very efficient. <<
Interesting! So you are essentially saying that Coanda's secret will
disappear with you? What a loss. Imagine how more efficient helicopters
could be made, or even made into flying saucers!
>> Neural Efficiency Amplifier, Neurophone increased Neural Efficiency <<
Wow! You should suggest that device to the Mensa group! <grin>
>> certain kinds of fish send out hydronic signals. <<
Hmmm! Interesting! Do you know why these fishes were capable of these
signals? (i.e. where they mostly fishes defending themselves against a
prey, or some other correlation?)
>> and could create the signals at any frequency and could also generate
>> and receive these signals in the air. >>
That's where it gets really interesting for me! If your phase was measured
with reference to the airwave, how did you know that it existed in the
air? I.e. how did you transmit and receive them?
>> whether scalar or not, we have detected these signals from the human
>> body. Each "chakra" oscillates at a different frequency. <<
That's what Dr. Valerie Hunt of UCLA is claiming too. I don't remember if
I already asked you the question, but did you read the book "the
Holographic Universe" by Michael Talbot? That's where I saw it mentioned.
There was also some holographic effects measured (something like a thought
pattern measured from a limb, or something like that).
>> The original Neurophone is a scalar device. It does transmit both EM
>> and Scalar signals but the body is responding mostly to the scalar
>> component. <<
From looking at the patents, that does not seem obvious. Can you tell me
how it was transmitting a scalar signal? Would it be when the audio signal
gets modulated on the carrier? (i.e. a negatively going audio signal
cancels out some part of the positively going carrier wave?) And how did
you determine that the body respond mostly to the scalar component? (That
puzzles me! <g>)
>> Bearden makes things too complex. He is brilliant and his math is
>> excellent. But he gives no guidelines for experimental work. <<
Tell me about it! I have read almost all of his papers. I have even posted
one of his most recent one in the library overhere (with his permission).
However, I understand that the guy is under non-disclosure rules so he
obviously cannot give details. The superficial stuff is nonetheless
interesting but it is not sufficient to convince old-fashioned R&D folks
that scalar waves can be used to have effects at distances, etc. It is
like cold fusion, or as the Japanese call it, New Hydrogen Energy (i.e.
not necessarily fusion), the establishment refuses to believes that there
is something there!
Page 7
>> mis-matched antenna work great<<
That's what they say about Tesla: he was aiming at imperfect VSWR. Have
you detected a different speed of propagation (than the speed of light)
for these scalar waves?
>> angle of the Great Pyramid is such that the apex is a perfect match to
>> the impedance of free space?
I remember having read that somewhere. I thought that it was only
circumstancial but again, they may have known what they were doing!
Especially if the Ark of the Covenant was reproduced (from the scriptures)
and found to generate lethal high voltages.
>> reversing the process we were able to maximize scalar and minimize EM. <<
How smart! Thanks for the hint.
>> Townsend Brown was a friend of mine way back. His "gravitators" and other
anti-gravity devices are scalar antennae. <<
The book "The Vindicator Scroll" by Stan Deyo describes some movie tape
from his devices. The author says that Brown was trying to build a device
approximating the shape of a saucer seen by Adamski. Is there any basis to
that?
>> The living system is infinitely more responsive to scalar signals. <<
That's what Bearden is saying. Mitogenetic radiations et al would rule the
body. He also says that some cells which died where revived with phase
conjugated mitogenetic radiations, only if they had not been exposed to UV
light in the mean time.
>> That's all for now! <<
Oh Yes! And there's more to come! (I'll repost your messages and this one
and hopefully, we'll get a few more participants to the discussion in the
New Age Science section).
Again, kindest regards, Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
08-Aug-93 19:29:05 - Fm: Dean Miller - To: Alain Beaulieu/SL9
Alain (and Patrick)
Keep it up!
I guess I'll have to download all the Bearden stuff. And Patrick, is there
any chance of sharing some of the details about your scalar acoustics? (At
least, that's what I think I read.<g>) Thanks
Dean
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
08-Aug-93 21:10:10 - Fm: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 - To: Dean Miller
Patrick is having visitors these days but he will come back soon.
Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
04-Aug-93 00:25 EDT - From: Patrick Flanagan - To: Alain Beaulieu
Alain - I got a copy of the Ziolkowski paper you told me about. This data
looks very familiar, it seems that others are also working in this area and
getting some interesting results. The information I sent you last night about
time encoding for 3-D hearing and Scalar signals from fish fit in. The
equipment that we used was very simple, I could easily draw up some
experiments that anyone could perform to create their very own scalar
comminicators. The text would have to be in Windows WRI or Word for Windows
format because I would have to make some drawings. The drawings I have seen
that have been rendered in ASCII are really crude. I really look forward to
Page 8
getting the Lawrence Livermore article from you.
Kindest regards, Patrick Flanagan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
04-Aug-93 - To: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 - From: Patrick Flanagan
Subj: Neurophone & uclusters
Dear Alain:
I get carried away with my writing and tend to put out information too
rapidly without ancillary backup.
1. EAR: I cannot remember what album it was, it was recorded in or around
1973 or 74.
2. I do not intend to die with Coanda's secret, I have thought about it and
see no problem in revealing the curves. Interestingly they are directly
related to Vortex curves. I need to write an article about Coanda's
"nozzles". The problem is that the people who could use the data probably
will never see the data no matter how we publish it.
3. According to Minto, the fish appear to be using these signals to
communicate. He used the system to locate schools of fish for fisherman
(in some trials). I worked with these detectors after we finished our NAVY
work. My intention is to put together some receivers and travel to a
dolphin research facility and see if I can record these signals from
dolphins.
4. The phase test was made by transmitting one signal through the air by EM
waves while simultaneously transmitting the scalar signal through the
water. The test was to prove that the water signal was indeed scalar.
Minto had a few detractors who said that the water signal must be an EM
signal. If it were an EM signal, the transmission of an EM signal through
water is much slower than the transmission speed through the air. So much
so that the time difference could be easily measured by a dual channel
oscilloscope. (Of course we all know that EM signals do not travel long
distances under water anyway). The test proved that the signal traveled as
fast through water as it did through the air. This indicates that the
water signal is not delayed or slowed down by denser media as are EM
waves.
5. Valerie Hunt's work bears no resemblance to our chakra work. The closest
work was done by Dr. Hiroshi Motoyama in Japan.
6. The NEUROPHONE as SCALAR DEVICE: The original Neurophone output was an
amplitude modulated 30 - 50 KHz signal with a voltage at resonance of
about 3000 peak to peak. The output electrodes were capacitor disks made
of copper and these were about one inch in diameter. The copper disks were
covered by thin mylar film (1/2 mil). The head and its distributed
dielectric qualities was the dielectric of a higher voltage capacitor!
Since the left and right Neurophone electrode signals were 180 degrees out
of phase with respect to each other, the EM signals canceled each other
somewhere in the middle of the head. Since the EM signals canceled we had
a powerful scalar vector left over right where we wanted it, inside the
brain!
7. BODY RESPONSE TO SCALAR FIELDS: In 1974, I created a device called the
Earth Resonance Generator. It was an 8 Hz pulse generator. The purpose of
the device was to create a Zietgeber or biological clock to balance the
energy centers of the body - Schuman Resonance Device. We used acupuncture
meters and a crude scalar detector and a ballistic kinesiometer to measure
the effect of the ERG on the body.
We first used magnetic coils as an output the switched to mobius coils.
The magnetic pulse had very little effect on our measurements. The mobius
coil (scalar coil) output had a powerful effect. If the mobius was left
hand wound, the effect was balancing and positive while a right hand
Page 9
mobius coil produced illness, i.e. nausea and headaches.
We marketed the ERG and sold about 40,000 of them between 1974 and 1980.
TWA airline crews purchased a lot of them because they prevented jet-lag.
8. PINK NOISE NEUROPHONE: In 1976, we put a device on the market that was
called the Pink Noise Neurophone. It was not for listening to music, but
produced a pink noise scalar wave. The device was really kind of like a
Scalar Wave Lakhovsky oscillator. Once we found that scalar waves are
acted on by the body, it seemed like the best thing to do. The PNN worked
so well it put all the acupuncture meridians into balance in about 20
minutes of use.
9. Scalar waves seem to be propagated instantly but my mind tells me that
this must not be so. The test under water would indicate that scalar waves
propagate faster than EM waves in certain media. It may be that scalar
waves can be propagated instantly is they have a tensor vector, i.e. they
modulate a tensor vector in the space matrix.
10. Townsend Brown found that the saucer shape was the best for a gravitator
vehicle. He found this shape by itself, and did not as far as I know get
it from Adamski. He and discussed the shape and he told me he came on it
himself.
Alain, I am enjoying our exchange. Most of this stuff has been buried in my
brain while I have worked on the water. It seems that we were a little bit
ahead of the rest. I am enjoying digging it out because I would like to put
it all together and write a book about all these things, a -- how to-- book
that experimenters can use to create their own equipment.
Until next time, Patrick Flanagan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
09-Aug-93 21:17:47 - Fm: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 - To: Patrick Flanagan
Subj: Neurophone, uclusters & Time Encoding (Outbox)
>> time encoding for 3-D hearing and Scalar signals from fish fit in. <<
Hmmm! That's not evident. Can you explain a bit? I will be mailing your
envelope within the next hour. It should take roughly a week to get to
you. From previous experience, similar envelope arrive looking as if they
went through a war zone! So let me know when you receive it (and whether
it made it in good shape!).
Regards, Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
04-Aug-93 17:24 LCL - To: Patrick Flanagan
>> I need to write an article about Coanda's "nozzles". The problem is
>> that the people who could use the data probably will never see the data no
>> matter how we publish it. <<
Why's that? Would it be because the type of "peer review" journals would
likely not believe in it and refuse to publish it? Or would it be because
it would be published in a non-field-related paper?
>> My intention is to put together some receivers and travel to a dolphin
research facility and see if I can record these signals from dolphins.<<
Well, at least, you have one contact handy via CIS: David Cole
[70515,1161].
>> the fish appear to be using these signals to communicate. He used the
>> system to locate schools of fish for fisherman (in some trials) <<
Huh? Do you mean that he could pick up "gossips" from the fish to point
out an area of fishing to stay away from (from the point of view of the
fish)?
Page 10
[Post-Ed: I did not know then that a "flock" of fish was called a "school" of
fish. That's something that got lost in the translation! A.B.]
>> comparison of EM in air with scalar in water<<
My question was aimed at comparing EM in air with scalar in air. In what
way did you detect that they were different?
>> Valerie Hunt<<
I'll get back to you after verification on that.
>> The head and its distributed dielectric qualities was the dielectric
>> of a higher voltage capacitor! <<
Why are you saying "of a higher voltage"? I can visualize that you have
two capacitors on a capacitors, and that the signals would have a phase
inversion because of the different polarity. Is that what you mean?
>> Earth Resonance Generator. It was an 8 Hz pulse generator. The purpose
>> of the device was to create a Zietgeber or biological clock to balance the
>> energy centers of the body - Schuman Resonance Device. <<
That sounds like what is being sold today as the Teslar. It was designed
by Dr. Puharich I believe. Are these ERGs still being manufactured and
sold today? What about the Pink Noise Neurophone?
>> Scalar waves seem to be propagated instantly but my mind tells me
>> that this must not be so. <<
If they are the primary field, they should be able to change the boundary
conditions of the "conventional" electromagnetism. According to Bearden,
you can accelerate the speed of time with scalar fields, so indirectly,
that would affect the speed of propagation. Dr. Aspden mentioned that a
fellow by the name of Wiener found that time was affected in a standing
wave, That was approx. 3 years after the Michelson-Morley experiment.
Aspden claims taht it is one of the reason why M-M experiment was faulty
(it had standing waves in it).
>> It seems that we were a little bit ahead of the rest. <<
Definitely!
>> I would like to put it all together and write a book about all these
>> things, a -- how to-- book that experimenters can use to create their own
>> equipment. <<
That would be EXTREMELY interesting! I was myself thinking of sorting out
through the stuff and writing something that sounds like Scalar EM 101 but
I am a bit rusty in my math, and some of the math that I have seen in the
EDEPT paper are enough to stop me dead in my track! Let me know if I can
help.
By the way, do you know Dr. Michrowski of the Planetary Association for Clean
Energy? He has writen of bibliography of all the "new energy" publications
and papers related to these weird topics.
Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
09-Aug-93 - Fm: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 - To: Patrick Flanagan [71650,60]
Subj: Neurophone & uclusters (Outbox)
Incidently, is there a reason why you prefer to discuss the neurophone by
E-mail rather than via the New Age Forum? The practice is that we normally
keep the E-mail for confidential matters but post the other messages in the
forum of interest so that more people can interract. That is why I requested
your explicit permission to repost most of our private discussion onto the
forum. So I assume that you still don't have any objection to myself
Page 11
reposting most of our last messages on the neurophone onto the forum?
Regards, Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
04-Aug-93 - To: Patrick Flanagan [71650,60]
Subj: Neurophone & uclusters (Outbox)
>> Valerie Hunt's work bears no resemblance to our chakra work. The
>> closest work was done by Dr. Hiroshi Motoyama in Japan. <<
You are right about Dr. Motoyama. The book says that he successfully
developed a technique for measuring the electrical presence of chakras.
But it does not say how. (p.190) [The Holographic Universe]
As to Valerie Hunt, Talbot says that she discovered that the electrodes of
the electromyograph could pick up a field of higher frequencies than the
highest component of the heart rate (averaged between 100 and 1600 cps,
but sometimes higher). But the fields were found to be strongest in the
areas associated with the chakras. (p.175) She did not measure them with
moebius sensors so she did not measure the scalar component but she did
detect the chakras. Your method was done using moebius sensors so your
work is definitely different than hers but I don't know how much different
Motoyama's work is from yours.
(The book did not have enough details to sort out all of this without your
explanations).
Regards, Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as this
paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the Vangard Sciences
address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 12
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/flan2.asc
+924
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,924 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
September 9, 1993
FLAN2.ASC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of William Bethel & Jim Shaffer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is a compilation of comments from the CompuServe (CIS) New Age
Forum - Moderated by Alain Beaulieu and sent to KeelyNet by William Bethel.
The file has been edited to eliminate redundancy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fm: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 70403,3645 - To: Dean Miller 75110,3417
Date: 09-Aug-93 02:13 EDT
From: Patrick Flanagan 71650,60
Subj: Neurophone & uclusters
Dear Alain:
I have no desire to keep these communications private. If I ever want to send
something to you privately I will indicate it in the beginning of my text. I
like to write these letters in Word for Windows so I can run the spelling
checker. When I am finished I save the file to the CSERVE directory as a Text
file with Layout. Then in WINCIM (now) I select send file from the mail menu.
When I write an article I will upload it as a file in the forum. Your
questions and my desire to answer them has led me to open up areas my mind
that I had shut off for many years. I have no problem with writing in ASCII
format and placing my drawings as GIF files. I will work along those lines.
Thank you for sending me the papers. I am digging out the Minto Papers for
you.
The reason Coanda kept his formulas secret was so that he could profit from
his years of hard work. He had a number of companies and institutions that
tried to use his discoveries without giving him credit or remuneration. He
earned his living from his inventions in much the same way that I earn my
living. I have talked to David Cole about my scalar wave receivers and we
will be testing them out on some dolphins. I will keep you informed about
what we find.
The Minto apparatus was used to locate schools of fish because the antenna
can be made very directional. Two ships can therefore locate schools of fish
by triangulating scalar wave emissions from the fish. We have not idea why
fish emit scalar signals. Every type of fish tested had a particular
"signature". The scalar signals were all emitted in the acoustic frequency
range. It may be that fish use these signals as a form of navigational signal
in much the same way dolphins use acoustic search signals.
I met Dr. Motoyama in Tokyo in 1974. He was using a circuit that was similar
to my first Neurophone to measure the energy of chakras. The device consisted
of an apparatus in which a person stands. A capacitor electrode arrangement
moved up and down the body. The capacitor electrodes were measuring the
Page 1
change in dielectric activity in the body at various locations.
The chakras produce a dynamic change in the dielectric constant of the air in
the area around the body. By measuring these changes, you can detect the
vibration and energy levels. By attaching appropriate electronics to the
Neurophone, we could also measure the dynamics of the chakras.
The Neurophone circuit can be used as a scalar transmitter or receiver.
Capacitors and the action of energy storage in dielectrics is not understood
by people who work with capacitors every day in electronic circuit design.
The phenomenon of energy storage in a capacitor is due to scalar
polarization. The same thing is true of energy storage in "space" by
magnetic fields. By understanding the true nature of "capacitors" we can
unlock the key to using scalar phenomena.
In 1974, I also visited Shinichi Seike who was working on "tachyon"
transformers and other devices. The term "tachyon" is simply another buzz
word for scalar. Seike's circuits and coil designs were all self canceling
configurations that neutralized electric and/or magnetic fields leaving the
scalar vector potential. The entire so-called tachyon devices that are now
being sold are simply items that have been charged with pyramids and/or crude
scalar devices. That's all for now.
Kindest regards, Patrick Flanagan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking forward to more messages. I'll relay your message to Dr. Flanagan
just in case he has not seen it in the forum. (He's still new at Compuserve!)
How do you like it so far?
Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
10-Aug-93 - Fm: Dean Miller 75110,3417 - To: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 70403,3645
Alain,
Verrry interesting. Really. It's been a very long time since I worked with
analog electronics, so I'm mighty rusty on self-cancelling coil design and
such. I also had no idea that there was so much work going on in the field
of electrical signals generated by living bodies (and fish sounds). I would
like to see a book or something that details some of the experiments
conducted and lines of future research. I certainly don't know much of
anything about chakras (except for some mystical stuff). As you can see, I'm
pretty much a neophyte where all this is concerned. But, boy, am I
interested.
Dean
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
09-Aug-93 - To: Patrick Flanagan [71650,60] Subj: Neurophone & uclusters
Dear Dr. Flanagan,
In case you have not seen the message on the New Age Forum, here one question
for you from one who would like to join the discussion. (Dean Miller
75110,3417):
Is there any chance of sharing some of the details about your scalar
acoustics? (At least, that's what I think I read.<g>)
>> Your questions and my desire to answer them has led me to open up areas
my mind that I had shut off for many years.<<
We certainly welcome your participation on this forum. You just can't
imagine how "thirsty" we are of learning from your lifelong experience in
"vangard" researchs.
Page 2
>> I am digging out the Minto Papers for you.<<
Thank you very much for your effort. I am really looking forward to learn
more about the scalar electromagnetic effects.
>> David Cole (about my scalar wave receivers) will be testing them out
on some dolphins.<<
I am so pleased to learn that you are getting all the cooperation that you
need!
>> Dr. Motoyama was using a circuit similar to my first Neurophone to
measure the energy of chakras. The capacitor electrodes were measuring the
change in dielectric activity in the body at various locations.<<
That sounds like what someone else was doing to detect frequencies to
which people were "allergic" to. In Europe, people were found to be
affected by the 50 Hz of power lines, while in North America, people were
affected by 60 HZ but not by 50 Hz. Have you heard of those? (I believe
that Dr. Michrowski is quite familiar with those).
>> By attaching appropriate electronics to the Neurophone, we could also
measure the dynamics of the chakras <<
That gets complicated! What sort of changes were you detecting?
>> Neurophone circuit can be used as a scalar transmitter or receiver.
Energy storage in capacitor is due to scalar polarization. Same thing
for energy storage in "space" by magnetic fields. Understanding the true
nature of "capacitors" can unlock the key to using scalar phenomena. <<
YES! I CERTAINLY want to know about that. Please tell us more!
>> Shinichi Seike <<
Have you got his last edition of "Principles of Ultra-Relativity". I think
it was published around 1990. (I have the edition prior to that one).
>> "tachyon" is simply another buzz word for scalar. Seike's circuits and
coil designs were all self canceling configurations <<
It was clear that they were cancelling but I had not figured out that his
"tachyon" buzzword was used to denote scalar properties.
>> so-called tachyon devices now being sold are simply items that have been
charged with pyramids and/or crude scalar devices.<<
I guess you don't get as much charge than if you get the real scalar
field. I remember reading that you had published and possibly done some
research on the pyramids. Can you tell us some info on that?
(Personally, my first interest is toward the scalar stuff but there are
people who are also interested in the other fields of "weird science").
Regards, Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
11-Aug-93 - To: Alain Bealieu - Fm: Patrick Flanagan 71650,60
Dear Alain:
1. The original Neurophone was a self-resonant system. As the dielectric
constant of the body/skin changes, the frequency shifts. This frequency
shift can be detected and converted into a variable voltage that can be
logged on a chart recorder. The frequency shift can be used as
information. This is the principle of the Motoyama chakra detector. One of
the things that has been reported from Russian research is that scalar
fields alter the characteristics of insulators. These characteristics
include: change in dielectric constant and conductivity of the insulator.
Page 3
2. Many years ago, I showed Dr. Walter Stark of Lugano, Switzerland a
phenomena I had discovered. If you make a coil of twin lead like speaker
wire, you have two wires side by side. The only connecting link is the
insulation between the wires. If you connect a battery in series with one
wire and ground and then connect the other wire to an electrometer, the
coil acts as a capacitor. The electrometer will measure the "leakage"
current through the insulator. The current will probably be in nanoamps.
If you then bring the coil in the vicinity of the body, the current will
increase by several orders of magnitude. This is due to the scalar field
around the body. If the coil is placed over the various chakras and the
output of the electrometer is connected to a chart recorder you will even
be able to record the pulsation of each chakra.
Dr. Stark used my idea in the creation of an instrument that became known
as an aura meter in Europe. It is also known as an orgone meter. By using
such a meter, newage scientists can learn a lot about scalar fields.
In giving these "secrets" away, it is my intention to stimulate research.
It is not my intention to hand all my secrets over on a silver platter. A
good teacher will stimulate thinking processes.
I have built all kinds of these "aura" or "orgone" meters. You can
experiment with different capacitor configurations and dielectrics. The
obvious question is --- if you can detect scalar fields with insulators,
can you generate these fields with insulators? The answer is a resounding
yes!
This goes back to my earlier statement that capacitors can be used to
generate scalar fields, traveling scalar standing waves etc. This
research has been used to create many kinds of transmitter and receivers.
The question of scalar acoustics really invloves the Neurophone.
More Later - Patrick Flanagan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
11-Aug-93 - Fm: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 70403,3645 - To: Patrick Flanagan 71650,60
Dear Patrick,
You finally landed in the Forum! Great! We should soon start to see more
participants into the discussion.
>> frequency shift as principle behind Motoyama chakra detector <<
Thanks for the insight into Motoyama's principle. However, on first
reading, it sounds close to Dr. Hunt's work where she used frequency
spectrum to detect patterns. In what way was Motoyama's works very
different from Hunt's work?
>> Russian research in scalar fields on insulators <<
Could you provide me with a reference paper or at least a scientist name
to look for in order to find more information?
>> coil of twin lead like speaker wire, <<
Great! The first thing that comes to mind is that the capacitive value of
the body may have been a factor here. However, the pulsation pattern would
provide a way to identify other causes. I can just see how scientists not
conversant with chakras and other mystical phenomena might overlook these
pulsations. Was there ever something published on this?
>> not my intention to hand all my secrets over on a silver platter. <<
Hehehe! As someone said, the information sinks in much better when the
student has tried to solve the problem but hit a wall! He will then be
very receptive to a demonstration of the solution.
>> can you generate these fields with insulators? The answer is a
Page 4
>> resounding yes! <<
That is why you say that Townsend Brown's capacitor were generating scalar
fields in order to produce their thrust under high voltage. An easy
hypothesis from this would be that scalar fields would be the key to
finding antigravity thrust properties. Have you done research in this
area?
>> capacitors can be used to generate scalar fields, traveling scalar
>> standing waves etc. <<
I have always been under the impression that standing waves do not
"travel". What do you mean by "travelling scalar standing waves" and how
would you produce them?
>> research has been used to create many kinds of transmitter and
>> receivers. <<
I remember reading in a patent by Gelinas that scalar fields have a
different speed than that of light and can go through media that EM fields
can't go through. Have you done measurements of propagation speed of
scalar fields?
>> More Later. <<
Really looking forward to this!
Alain
(By the way, I will use this opportunity to officially welcome you to the New
Age Forum. Also, if you browse around other sections, you are likely to find
other interesting discussions. Feel free to join in the discussions at any
time.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
12-Aug-93 - Fm: Jonathan Eagle 72257,2270 - To: Patrick Flanagan 71650,60
Patrick,
I very happy to see that you will be participating in the New Age forum and
sharing some of your hard-earned experience. I think a great deal of benefit
for all can come of this. I would like very much to build a relatively
simple device that can demonstrate and/or measure scalar energy. It sounds
as if the device you described consisting of the battery, the coil of zip
cord (speaker wire) and the electrometer is just such a device. However, I
am having a little trouble understanding what is connected to what.
At first I thought you were saying that on one end of the coiled zip cord the
positive battery terminal is attached to say the ribbed conductor and the
negative terminal is attached to the other conductor while a high impedance
voltmeter is connected across the conductors on the other end of the zip
cord. But I think that that would only measure battery voltage and not
insulator leakage current. So now I am wondering if you meant to have one
conductor of the coiled zip cord connected to the positive end of the
battery, the other conductor at the same end of the zip cord connected to the
positive lead of the voltmeter, and the remaining negative battery terminal
connected to the negative lead of the voltmeter leaving the other end of the
zip cord unconnected. Is this what you were conveying or am I missing the
boat altogether?
I guess while you are answering questions, here are some others that occur to
me: is a one layer coil sufficient to make a sensitive enough detector for
chakra mapping (or whatever) or should the coil be multilayered? Also, can
the leads be allowed to twist in the coil or should one be careful to keep
the conductors always alternating?
Jonathan
Page 5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
13-Aug-93 - Fm: Patrick Flanagan 71650,60 - To: Alain Beaulieu 70403,3645
Dear Alain,
1. >> frequency shift as principle behind Motoyama chakra detector <<
The Motoyama detector measures changes in dielectric field resonance in
the space around the body. Dr. Hunt uses direct contact EMG electrodes
as far as I know. The Motoyama signal is due to a change in the spatial
dielectric constant around the body as a result of the scalar potential
variation.
2. >> Russian research in scalar fields on insulators <<
Handbook of PSI Discoveries pg 329
Sheila Ostrander <> Lynn Schroeder
A New Type of Detector to Register Physiological Functions
G.A. Sergeyev <> G.D. Shushkev <> E.G. Gryaznukin
The Sergeyev Detector
"The electrical-field activity of excited cells in the human organism can be
regarded as turbulent low-temperature plasma that affects the dielectric
properties of the environment.
Experimental investigations of low-temperature plasma structures of
biological origin, together with computations performed by computer, brought
us (Sergeyev, 1968) to the conclusion that the energetic processes in living
organisms are subject to the formal requirements demanded by the
thermodynamic systems with negative temperatures.
The Maser effects of the living organism result in the emission of highly
concentrated streams of free electrons and protons into free space, which may
change the local properties of the dielectric properties of the air.
The above theoretical prerequisites laid the foundation for the proposed new
type of detector. The principles of operation are based on the fixed voltage
between two capacitive plates, separated by a dielectric with non-linear
properties. Polarized barium titanate crystal (BaTiO3) was used as a
dielectric.
The voltage of the output of a barium titanate element is of course
determined by the formula:
4 II d E / E(p) * D1/1 (Acoustic Pressure)
E = 10^12 dynes/cm^2
d = 1.75 * 10^-6 (Young's Module)
E(p) = dielectric constant depending on P -
the degree of turbulence of the plasma field of biological origin.
The Sergyev Detector used barium titanate but any insulator will do and it
does not have to be piezo-electric!
>> coil of twin lead like speaker wire, <<
Nothing was ever published on this. It was entirely my own research. The
first "publication" is here in the Forum.
3. >> can you generate these fields with insulators? The answer is a
>> resounding yes! <<
I have succeeded in generating Gravitational Thrust much higher than
that obtained by Townsend Brown.
Page 6
4. >> capacitors can be used to generate scalar fields, traveling scalar
>> standing waves etc. <<
A "traveling" standing wave is generated by causing a slight phase
difference between two phase canceled carriers. By varying the phase,
the standing wave scalar field can be caused to "walk" or move... at
least it looks like it is in motion.
5. >> research has been used to create many kinds of transmitter and
receivers. <<
Alain : I remember reading in a patent by Gelinas that scalar fields have a
different speed than that of light and can go through media that EM
fields can't go through. Have you done measurements of propagation
speed of scalar fields?
Patrick: This is true the ability of scalar fields to travel through water
and earth enables these signals to be transmitted over great
distances where EM fields would be lost. They do travel faster than
Maxwellian fields because they are not Maxwellian and obey different
laws. I am really surprised that EM signals are being used for
submarine communications because scalar waves will do the job in two
way communications for a fraction of the cost. I think that UFO's or
ET's communicate with scalar signals and all the work being done
with radio telescopes will never get any results. Scalar signals may
be used to modulate interdimensional or inter-galactic waves being
generated by stellar phenomena. Radio communications is outmoded by
advanced technology.
In my next communique I will give you some of the Minto details.
Kindest regards, - Patrick
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
13-Aug-93 - Fm: Patrick Flanagan 71650,60 - To: Jonathan Eagle 72257,2270 (X)
Dear Jonathan,
The Scalar Detector coil is a two wire coil such that the two wires are not
in electrical contact with each other. The wires act as a capacitor, being
two parallel coils side by side with capacitive coupling through the
insulation. The positive terminal of the battery is attached to one of the
coils and the nagative of the battery is attacthed to the electrometer
ground. The second wire coil (of the zip wire) goes to the input of the
electrometer.
The electrometer is measuring the leakage current through the wire
insulation. All so called insulators are simply poor conductors, but they
are conductors measuring in hundreds of millions of ohms. Scalar fields alter
the conduction characteristicas of insulators. The electrometereads the
change in current.
The description I gave you is a starting point. I have made detectors that
are much better. You can wind parallel coils out of thing enameled wire and
you will get better results. I used #28 wire for mine and my coil measures
two inches in diameter and ten inches long. I was able to map chakras with
that coil.
Kindest regards, - Patrick
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
13-Aug-93 - Fm: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 70403,3645 - To: Patrick Flanagan 71650,60
>> Dr. Hunt uses direct contact EMG electrodes as far as I know. <<
Correct. I could not see anything to the contrary. Maybe I am starting to
confuse her work with someone else who had observed holographic field
properties from anywhere on the body.
Page 7
>> thermodynamic systems with negative temperatures. <<
Negative temperature? I guess you are talking about the tendency to go
toward order rather than disorder, and by extrapolation from entropic
rules, you would need a negative temperature to go toward greater order.
Is that what you mean?
>> low-temperature plasma structures of biological origin, <<
Hmmm! Bearden was saying that ionized gases such as a flame, etc, are
affected by scalar fields. I guess that would explain why the human body
is so much ruled by scalar fields (as you stated it is).
>> The Maser effects of the living organism result in the emission of highly
concentrated streams of free electrons and protons into free space, <<
Why Maser as an example? Are those free electrons and protons emitted in
the microwave frequency range?
>> 4 II d E / E(p) * D1/1 (Acoustic Pressure) <<
Which acoustic pressure is that? What does D1 stand for and why is it over
"1"?
>> The first "publication" is here in the Forum. <<
Thank you very much for this Great Premiere!
>> generating Gravitational Thrust much higher than that obtained by
>> Townsend Brown. <<
Wow! Was it with barium titanate too? What exactly decreased the
efficiency of Brown's setups?
>> "traveling" standing wave <<
So these waves would be less efficient than full standing waves? Why would
you want them to move rather than stay stationary?
>> They do travel faster than Maxwellian fields because they are not
>> Maxwellian and obey different laws. <<
GREAT NEWS! How much faster? Is this so clear cut that it could put
Einstein's theories (including the limit of the speed of light) into
questions, and thereto revolutionize quantum physics?
>> all the work being done with radio telescopes will never get any
>> results <<
I fully agree with you! The SETI program to send messages in EM hoping to
get a message back is not the way to get results. We could use the money
to better use.
Regards, Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 09-Aug-93 21:14 LCL
MgTo: Patrick Flanagan [71650,60]
Subj: Neurophone & uclusters (Outbox)
Dear Dr. Flanagan,
In case you have not seen the message on the New Age Forum, here one question
for you from one who would like to join the discussion. (Dean Miller
75110,3417):
Is there any chance of sharing some of the details about your scalar
acoustics? (At least, that's what I think I read.<g>)
>> Your questions and my desire to answer them has led me to open up areas my
mind that I had shut off for many years.<<
Page 8
We certainly welcome your participation on this forum. You just can't
imagine how "thirsty" we are of learning from your lifelong experience in
"vangard" researchs.
>> I am digging out the Minto Papers for you.<<
Thank you very much for your effort. I am really looking forward to learn
more about the scalar electromagnetic effects.
>> David Cole (about my scalar wave receivers) will be testing them out on
some dolphins.<<
I am so pleased to learn that you are getting all the cooperation that you
need!
>> Dr. Motoyama was using a circuit similar to my first Neurophone to measure
the energy of chakras. The capacitor electrodes were measuring the change
in dielectric activity in the body at various locations.<<
That sounds like what someone else was doing to detect frequencies to
which people were "allergic" to. In Europe, people were found to be
affected by the 50 Hz of power lines, while in North America, people were
affected by 60 HZ but not by 50 Hz. Have you heard of those? (I believe
that Dr. Michrowski is quite familiar with those).
>> By attaching appropriate electronics to the Neurophone, we could also
measure the dynamics of the chakras <<
That gets complicated! What sort of changes were you detecting?
>> Neurophone circuit can be used as a scalar transmitter or receiver. Energy
storage in capacitor is due to scalar polarization. Same thing for energy
storage in "space" by magnetic fields. Understanding the true nature of
"capacitors" can unlock the key to using scalar phenomena.<<
YES! I CERTAINLY want to know about that. Please tell us more!
>> Shinichi Seike <<
Have you got his last edition of "Principles of Ultra-Relativity". I think
it was published around 1990. (I have the edition prior to that one).
>> "tachyon" is simply another buzzword for scalar. Seike's circuits and coil
designs were all self canceling configurations<<
It was clear that they were cancelling but I had not figured out that his
"tachyon" buzzword was used to denote scalar properties.
>> so-called tachyon devices now being sold are simply items that have been
charged with pyramids and/or crude scalar devices.<<
I guess you don't get as much charge than if you get the real scalar
field. I remember reading that you had published and possibly done some
research on the pyramids. Can you tell us some info on that?
Regards, Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flanagan - 1993-August-17 22:43 - TO: Alain Beaulieu - FM: Patrick Flanagan
Dear Alain:
I received your package and would like to thank you for sending it. I have
not completed it yet. I will comment on it after I have digested it.
1. It reminds me of some work that was done at Aberdeen Proving Grounds. I
spent some time there in the 1960's. They developed a device that they
called the "Anal Sphincter Resonator". It seems that they had discovered
the mechanical resonance of the average anal sphincter. There was an off-
Page 9
Broadway play in New York. It was a suspense thriller. The special effects
man wanted to play very low musical note when danger was being acted out.
This note was to "shake up" the audience and lend some subliminal effect.
The engineer made a large organ pipe out of sewer pipe. He connected a fan
to the pipe to provide air flow. On opening night, they had a full house.
When the organ was switched on, the entire audience dumped in their pants.
The show closed on opening night. The revue said that it was a crappy
play. Aberdeen heard about the effect and developed a "sound cannon" that
resonated at about 13 Hertz. They tried it and it worked. They were going
to use it for riot crowd control if it was ever needed. They certainly
could have used it in Los Angeles. No one wants to march when their pants
are dirty. The only problem with the machine was that the operator had to
were diapers. The "phased" arrays in the ADEPT seems like it would lend
itself to producing focused sound waves in any frequency range. Maybe one
could be built that was directional.
2. I have been going through the Wallace Minto papers and they do not really
tell how to generate and receive hydronic waves. They do tell about
experiments that prove that they are not EM waves. I am copying them for
you and should get them off to you in a day or so.
3. In the mean-time, I am composing some more data for the forum. You can
share the Aberdeen Proving ground data with the forum if you like.
Kindest regards, - Patrick Flanagan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Aberdeen Proving Grounds <<
These are infrasound weapons. There are supposed to be frequencies that
resonate your spine, some others that create headaches, etc. They can
hardly be attenuated by obstacle. In short, a sort of neutron bomb. As to
the anal sphincter resonance, I remember reading that Tesla had fabricated
a vibration platform and invited VIPs for a demo. The mayor had to leave
suddenly for a trip to the little corner when Tesla went through this
critical frequency in his setups. (Hehehe! re. Broadway play, they must
have been careful to choose their words to call it a crappy play!).
I remember reading something about an infrasound canon being made of
propane burners. I guess the combustion was interrupted to the desired
frequency rate like in the pulsoreactors of the V1 (combustion is stop and
go due to a shutter closing and opening at the front of the reactor.)
>> focused sound waves <<
Ziolkowski said that he had tested the result of acoustics in water tanks
in the lab. So I would say that they are already directional. But it is
amazing how extra dimensional variables can be helpful in getting the
results. It's probably why Bearden was enthusiastics with hypernumbers for
a solution of x^2=0 with x different of zero. This sounds quite compatible
with the scalar approach of cancelling fields.
>> Minto papers <<
The proof that they are not EM waves would be very handy. As to how to
generate them, your story of specially designed horn could point to a way
to do it. But it would be unsuitable in the non-microwave region. Do you
remember what range of frequencies Minto was using?
>> more data for the forum <<
Thank you very much. We are all awaiting your next brief! If you are short
of ideas, I can prepare more questions from your write ups.
Best regards, - Alain Beaulieu
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
His reply of 20 Aug 03:20:
Dear Alain,
Page 10
Minto used frequencies in the audio range to about 50 KHz. He told me that
he could not generate his "hydronic" signals in the RF range. I experimented
first with the audio and ultrasonic range (these are not acoustic waves but
are electrically generated). I then found out the secret of the antenna that
I mentioned earlier, i.e. to make sure and do the opposite of calculations
for EM antennas. For example, EM antennas are calculated for resonances but
the hydronic antenna is out of resonance.
The tank circuits can be resonant but the antenna is not. The hydronic or
scalar signal amplitude is not dependent on power it is dependent on voltage.
The higher the voltage on the antenna, the more powerful is the signal.
J. Willard Gibbs published a mathematical treatise on a "non Maxwellian"
signal. See:
"The Scientific Papers of J. Willard Gibbs", Vol II, Chapter XVIII; Peter
Smith. (Non Maxwellian transmission of energy. Now known as a scalar
field).
The Minto hydronics signal is an exact physical interpretation of the Gibbs
paper. It is amazing that no one apparantly took Gibbs seriously. The
experiment described by Gibbs works! If you cannot find it, I have the book
somewhere in my library and can probably find it and copy it for you.
I have been busy with business for the past few days. I have to work at least
once a week! We have installed computer language scanner and translation
programs on our computer and can now translate Russian, German, French,
Spanish and Italian. Chinese and Japanese are on the way. I have been
working on some data for the forum and will send it soon.
Regards, - Patrick
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
21-Aug-93 - - Fm: Patrick Flanagan 71650,60 - To: Alain Beaulieu 70403,3645
Flanagan
<c>1993 Patrick Flanagan
Permission is given to duplicate this information as long as the author's
name and copyright notice are intact.
1993-August-21 02:36am
TO: Alain Beaulieu
FM: Patrick Flanagan
Subj: Hydronic Radiation (Scalar Transmission Through Air and Water)
In the 1960's, Wallace Minto, a Florida inventor developed an underwater
communications technology based on what he called Hydronic and Plasmonic
Waves. Using 100 mw transistor transmitters, he was able to transmit
electronic signals through miles of sea-water. The characteristics of his
hydronic signal fits the present day description of scalar waves.
These signals were transmitted instantaneously through water without an
delay. The US Naval Research laboratory published data on the velocity of
underwater low frequency transmission:
Velocity = 1525 * Sqrt Frequency
Velocity is in meters per second
This means that a 6 KHz EM signal will propagate through water at a rate of
Page 11
118,000 meters per second. Wheras the same EM signal in air would propagate
at 300,000,000 meters per second.
This means that is we were to transmit one signal through the air, and
another through 100 meters of water, we should be able to detect a phase
shift between the two signals. The EM signal through water would take about
0.8 milliseconds while the air signal would take .000033 milliseconds. A
phase shift would be easy to detect with a dual channel oscilloscope. The air
signal was used to trigger the A channel while the B signal came from the
scalar receiver. When the test was conducted, no phase shift was detected
between the two signals. No test has been conducted at distances great enough
to detect if there is a difference in transmission speed in air. Data would
tend to indicate that scalar signals may travel faster than EM signals.
Scalar signals are non Maxwellian waves and are "tensor" type signals.
Also, the scalar signal is transmitted with virtually no attenuation.
The attenuation for an EM signal under water is:
Attn (db/meter) = 0.03 Sqrt F
Therefore, the attenuation for a 6 KHz signal at 100 meters would be 250 db.
The receiver had a sensitivity of 10^-9 watts. Therefore, in order to receive
the signal, an EM transmitter would have to have a power of 10^16 watts, or
more than 10,000 times the power generating capacity of the entire world.
We were able to transmit signals at 6 KHz and higher into the 100 KHz range
over distances of several miles. These feats are naturally impossible by
means of EM signals.
You can tell from the formulas, the reason the US Government is using very
low frequency signals in its efforts at transmitting signals through the
eareth's mantle to nuclear submarines. A 30 Hz EM signal would attenuate 0.16
db per meter. The propagation velocity would be 8 Kilometers per second. With
scalar waves, you can achieve unlimited distances and you can communicate in
both directions!
Antennae:
Scalar antennae behave exactly opposite to EM antennae. For example, the
dipole antenna:
A dipole antenna receives and transmits maximally broadside to the antenna. A
scalar signal is received and transmitted maximally in the coaxial direction,
that is where the EM signal is at a null - off the ends of the antenna. An EM
dipole is resonant at 1/2 wavelength for maximum EM signal while the dipole
nust not be at resonance for scalar transmission.
We are going to use audio frequencies and very short dipoles. Make two
dipoles out of PVC tubing. The tubing should be about six feet long. Attach
metal plates at the end of each tube. These can be about one foot square.
Drive the antenna with coaxial cable in the middle. Run a wire from the
center of each PVC tub out to the metal plates. Run the wire in the middle
of the tubes.
Detectors:
Scalar detection occurs in a non-linear transistor amplifier. The base
emitter junction of a transistor if properly biased will act as a great
scalar detector. The best transistors for scalar detection are surface-
barrier transistors although other transistor circuits can be made to perform
Page 12
quite will. When we are using scalar signals in the audio range, an ordinary
audio amplifier can be modified to detect scalar signals. Minto connected his
dipole leads directly to the base and emitter of the first input transistor
of an audio amplifier.
Transmitter:
The transmitter can be a simple modulated audio oscillator. The output
voltage should be as high as possible. (in air, this is no problem) You can
use a power audio amplifier as a transmitter and drive it with a pure audio
tone to run your tests. Connect the speaker output of the amplifier to a
vacuum tube audio output transformer. Get one that has an impedence ratio of
4 ohms to 16,000 ohm sor higher. Connect the output transformer so that the 4
ohm coil is connected to the speaker output terminal. The high voltage side
of the transofrmer will connect to the transmitting dipole.
The output signal is a funtion of voltage and not current. The higher the
voltage, the stronger the scalar signal. In a EM dipole transmitter, the
energy is transferred in the form of current. The scalar system is just the
opposite.
The setup I am describing is for air to air transmission. The water and earth
system require different parameters. This is just to get you started.
After for successfully detect the signal, you can experiment with different
input circuits to maximize detection. Most commercial audio amplifiers have
sufficient non-linearity to detect the scalar signal from the transmitter.
Meter:
You can measure field strenght at the receiver by connecting a Digital Meter
accross the output of the amplifier. You will also want to connect a speaker
or headphones to the oputput so you can monitor the signal acosutically.
If you take your receiver down to the ocean and aim the dipole at the water
like a rifle, you will be able to detect signals from fish if you use an
audio amplifier as a receiver. Use headphones.
Well, that's it for now. The experiments I have described are in introduction
into scalar communications. We have developed this system so that it is very
sophisticated and can generate and receive these siognals in virtually any
frequency range.
Let me know how you make out.
Kindest regards, - Patrick Flanagan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
21-Aug-93 - Fm: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 70403,3645 - To: Patrick Flanagan 71650,60
>> The best transistors for scalar detection are surface- barrier
>> transistors although other transistor circuits can be made to perform
>> quite will. <<
Thanks for the hints! About the surface barrier transistors, I just
watched a 4 hour videotape on the Montauk project also known as the
Philadelphia Experiment revisited. At the end, Preston Nichols goes into a
"mathematical frenzy" to explain how the USS Eldridge was made to
disappear. He explained that the universe was really a torus. The rate of
time is the motion of the 3-D world along the torus but the time itself is
a twistor around it which results into a helicoidal path around the ring
of the torus. In short, we live in a 5-D world of which 3 dimensions are
Page 13
space and 2 dimensions are time. If you can get phased out of the twistor
time, you can be made to disappear. He explained that you needed SBT
transistors for that and that the US Navy was preventing the public of
having access to those. It would appear that it is what makes the Stealth
fighters real stealthy (i.e. one step further than Electronic Warfare).
Now, in the video, he says that he found a batch of 40,000 of them that
were sold by Radio Shack and bought them all because they are not made
anymore. So my question to you is: Do you know of part nos for SBT that
are available commercially, and if not available, what olther alternatives
are there?
In spite of VERY wild claims in it, the Montauk story has a ring of truth
to it so I would certainly enjoy it if you could vision it and provide us
with your comments. The tape is #610217 and is titled "Conference
Workshop: Delta t Generator & the Philadelphia Experiment" by Al Bielek.
It sells for $39.95 from The International Tesla Society. It starts by the
story of Tesla (first 1.5 hour) and then goes into the philadelphia
experiment background (Einstein, Von Neumann, Tesla, etc, and the Advanced
Study Institute in Princeton). They also have the book "The Montauk
Project: Experiment in Time" by Preston B. Nichols, 1992, Sky Books,
Westbury, New York, ISBN 0-9631889-0-9.
You can reach them at 1-800-397-0137, or (719) 475-0918, FAX: (719) 475-0582.
The tape was from a workshop they had during their last Extraordinary Science
on 22-25 July 1993 in Colorado Springs.
Regards, Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
22-Aug-93 - Fm: Alain Beaulieu/SL9 70403,3645 - To: Christopher T. Malcheski
>> What's a good book to read to get a very basic introduction to what
>> scalar waves are and how they work? <<
That's the problem: there is no one good book. But the best one I've seen
is Bearden's book titles: "AIDS: Biological Warfare". I think it was
chapter 4 which was subtitled Extraordinary Physics. Bearden keeps it
mysterious because of non-disclosure agreements that he had to sign with
some researchers but it is a very good start.
Alain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as
this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 14
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/flexbil1.asc
+299
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,299 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : FLEXBIL1.ASC | Online Date : 12/26/95 |
| Contributed by : Bill Beaty | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following is a response to the FLEXFLO files from the InterNet.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <billb@mail.eskimo.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 00:00:25 -0800 (PST)
From: William Beaty <billb@eskimo.com>
To: Roamer <jon@globalone.net>
cc: keelynet@ix.netcom.com
Subject: Re: Keelynet's new files
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Roamer wrote:
> You should check out Keelynet for the most recent file updates.
> Jerry Decker has compiled quite a few new and interesting files
> pertaining to electrical devices. This is one text I thought
> you should see.
> This is the first time I've tried sending a file with a message,
> so....
Hi, got the file. But... unfortunately this has more to do with electricity
misconceptions than it does with free energy. The author is mixed up about
the two different things which flow in wires, and believes he has found
something that violates energy conservation. Nope. I guess I come across as
a raving skeptic in the following! Also, when I speak about "you" in the
following, I'm talking to anyone reading this, not to Mr. Roamer.
> > The first and most important principle of these circuits is the
understanding
> > that a resistive 'Load' DOES NOT CONSUME electricity...
...but the word "electricity" has two contradictory definitions: Electric
Charge, and Electric Energy. This causes problems. Read this carefully.
Resistors consume "electric energy" at the same time that "electric charge"
flows through them and back out. This is something like a fan being driven by
a fanbelt: the fan consumes energy and does work to stir the air, but at the
same time as the BELT flows "through" the fan's pully and is not consumed at
all.
The fanbelt is similar to the electrons in a circuit. In the resistor and in
the fan, no energy flows *through* the devices, all the energy flows INTO the
devices and is consumed/converted. See?
Electrons flow through things, while energy flows into things and is consumed.
Electrons are not consumed, and energy does not flow through things and back
out.
The situation with electric circuits is usually described as if it is strange
and mysterious, but it really is extremely similar to the fanbelt/fan setup.
The problem is that we use the word "electricity" to name both the "fanbelt"
part of a circuit and the "energy" part of a circuit. This is a rotten
situation, and it leaves many people with the equivalent of the belief that
the rubber of the fanbelt is a form of energy which is consumed by the fan.
Sound too silly to believe? Well, believing that fanbelts are made of pure
energy is the same as believing that electrons are a form of energy. No,
electrons are matter. Electrons in a circuit aren't created or destroyed,
they are simply pumped around and around in a circle. A battery does not
supply electrons or store them.
A battery is a chemically powered electron pump. Capacitors do not store
electrons, they pump them. Every time an electron leaves a capacitor, another
comes in through the other wire at the same time, so the total amount of
electrons inside the device never change. But, at the same time the energy in
the capacitor can be decreasing or increasing. Electrons are not energy!
> > Nobody ever seems to notice the obvious contradiction between electricity
> > passing COMPLETELY THROUGH a load and electricity being CONSUMED WITHIN a
> > load. It has to be one or the other, not both.
...either that, or maybe there is something wrong with the word "electricity."
And while one thing is being consumed by the load, another separate thing is
flowing *through* the load.
Or to put it another way, "joules" and "coulombs" are the way we measure the
two flows of totally different entities in wires. Joules per second are
watts, and coulombs per second are amperes. Amps are not watts. The same
high-wattage load can be designed to run on high voltage and low amperage, or
on low voltage and high amperage.
If you tell me that a load uses "lots of electricity," you've told me nothing,
because the word "electricity" is faulty, and I don't know if you're referring
to the quantity of electrons or to the quantity of energy. An electrical load
can use 100 watts of energy flow but with almost no electron flow. Or it can
use the same 100 watts of energy flow at an enormous electrons flow.
> > Resistive loads only slow down the current, they don't consume it. If they
> > did, your battery would last longer on devices that consumed more
> > electricity because the electrons would vanish inside the load and never
> > reach the positive pole of the battery. In the real world a circuit works
> > like this, one electron goes in, one electron comes out. That's just the
> > way it works.
Yes, this is right.
> > The FLEXFLO circuits are designed to hold a volume of electricity and
> > "pour" it from one bank of capacitors to another bank through a load. If
> > the circuit in FLEXFLO2.GIF is constructed using standard grade
> > electrolytic capacitors, it should move approximately 3 to 4 times as much
> > electricity through the load area than what is actually drawn from the
> > battery. (based on actual circuit measurements and calculations.)
This is entirely conventional. It is a well-known effect in AC systems. A
similar thing happens when you power a 12v bulb with a 10-to-1 stepdown
transformer that's plugged into 120Vac. The voltage is stepped down, while
the current is stepped up.
If you measure the current in this bulb, it will be TEN TIMES HIGHER THAN THE
CURRENT BEING DRAWN FROM THE WALL OUTLET! Would you say that the transformer
magically creates ten times more "electricity?" I hope not, because the
wattage going from the 120Vac outlet and into the bulb is the same all through
the system, even though the current and voltage are at different levels at
different places.
And for a free energy device, only the wattage is important, because wattage
is an amount of energy which flows over a time period.
<lots of calculations deleted, ending with:>
> > Over-Unity output = 3.815 coulombs or 383% "efficiency"
No.
"Over Unity" is a measure of energy flow. Not of coulombs or amperes. Stepup
transformers can increase voltage, but we do not call them "over unity"
devices. Stepdown transformers increase current (coulombs per second) but we
don't say "over unity." The only time you should use the "o/u" word is when
discussing energy throughput. The quantity of coulombs is unimportant if you
do not measure the wattage in and out of your device.
Another thought: if you wrap a superconductor wire around a magnet, connect
the ends of the wire together, then remove the magnet, you create a permanent
current circulating in the wire. If you measured it, you would find coulombs
and coulombs flowing continuously through each part of the wire. And this
continues forever.
Is it a neverending source of energy? No, it is a spinning mass of matter.
If you try to tap the energy from a shorted superconductor coil, the current
will decrease to zero. Same as with a flywheel: use it to do work, and the
flywheel slows and stops.
> > Since there is a fixed amount of potential loss per cycle, it would be
> > best to design a load that makes the most use of each charge cycle.
The above sentence holds the key: "potential loss." If the flow of colombs
per second is constant, potential loss represents energy loss.
To create an overunity device, you must have INCREASING potential at constant
current. You have to have voltage rises on each component which are greater
than the voltage drops. You have to have excess, overunity wattage.
.....................uuuu / oo \ uuuu........,.............................
William Beaty voice:206-781-3320 bbs:206-789-0775 cserv:71241,3623
EE/Programmer/Science exhibit designer http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/
Seattle, WA 98117 billb@eskimo.com SCIENCE HOBBYIST web page
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker )
Subject: Re: Keelynet's new files
To: William Beaty <billb@eskimo.com>
Hi Bill! Thanks for the comments about the FlexFlo files....much of the
Flexflo info is from George Wisemans 'Energy Conserver' material and I posted
it AS RECEIVED. There are questions I have with regard to the circuit, but on
weighing whether I (or anyone else) should hold back on posting it or just
putting it online and letting it take its course, I chose the latter.
Those questions led me to want to await verification (via KeelyNet users) of
some sort and is why I did not post the FLEXFLO material to you or other
InterNet contacts where it would wind up in A VERY GLOBAL FORUM and make it
subject to the propensity of many InterNet folks to flame it up FROM THE
START.
I learned a great deal from the MRA fiasco and will not repeat it in future.
It should NEVER have been posted on the InterNet (or mailed out to various
newsletters/magazines) until it had been SUCCESSFULLY duplicated by other
experimenters, which to date has NEVER HAPPENED (to my knowledge), despite all
comments that it has. (I still get numerous phone calls reporting NO O/U
success even with MANY variations.)
What criteria determines duplication? How about the inverse of
Puthoff/Littles or Frode Olsens report style...that is (basic);
1) equipment used
2) circuit layout
3) measurements taken at of power various points in tabular form
4) measurements of input and output in tabular form and totalled
5) measurements with various loads in tabular form
The wish to believe in a working O/U device got tangled up with a lot of spook
explanations (and claims) that did not bear out in the real world. Learning
from the MRA experience, I felt it better to see what happened on Keelynet
FIRST with FLEXFLO, after others had played with the circuit and reported with
their own evaluations and ideas. (as of 12/20, FLEXFLO appears to have at
least one duplication, by Dave Cahoon, as per the claim).
As to the COLDFISS, even though the inventor said he produced a continuous 200
Watts over 7 months, there have not been any confirmations YET (even Perrault
says no one has contacted him with a duplication).
Joel McClain in fact brought up a point about possible safety hazards from x-
rays or gamma emissions since it is a fission process. I asked Bruce about
this and he said NO, HE HAD NOT TESTED FOR ANY KIND OF EMISSIONS. But he
plans to check this out and will report on what he finds.
Rruce Perrault's kids don't have flippers and the family has no ill health so
he kind of doubts there is anything to worry about. After all, he's been
working with these since at least 1988 and still no problems.
One of the problems I have with many of the InterNet UseNets and message
responses is the tendency to take issue with SEMANTICS, rather than the
CONCEPTS presented.
There is conceptual analysis and then there is analysis borne out by direct
experiment. As I see it, it is up to THE INDIVIDUAL (reading the information)
to determine whether a particular plan or idea HAS MERIT before spending both
time and money on trying to duplicate it.
Some people just wait until others do it and report positive results
(successful duplication).... Others are very gung ho and just jump right
in..in truth, I prefer the gung ho folks but mostly after they have discussed
or asked questions from their peers, questions of the inventor directly and
other relevant research. This way, the chances of success are much greater.
Circuits and projects for ORTHODOX plans and schematics are EXPECTED to work
as claimed, and IDEALLY, claimed O/U, F/E and other type alternative projects
SHOULD also work as claimed. However, as Bearden points out, we are all
breaking new ground and mistakes are INVEITABLE.
On discovering the mistake, honest people of integrity will post the details
of how the project went awry and was misinterpreted. This way, people know
what happened and will look out for it in future experiments. Look at the
events which surround the TOD.
One of the fears of many people I have spoken with or known has been that of
some kind of suppression. To minimize it, they want to post their plans and
'get it out' before anything happens. This can lead to half-baked ideas or
projects. I get several of these a year that never make it online after the
inventor (or someone else) finds the error and sheepishly says 'never mind'.
Enthusiasm should not be allowed to overcome some kind of step by step,
scientific method, especially that of successful DUPLICATION.
Wouldn't it be nice to have one or more trusted friends who could verify the
experiment BEFORE posting it? (Easily done on a local BBS without global
exposure until it had been confirmed...) And I think tables and diagrams
showing the results of the experiment, with equipment used, etc....should be
necessary in a well documented paper. That, plus a caveat that this is the
response WE (the inventor or person duplicating the experiment) got, if it
interests you, please try to verify it using similar documentation and see if
you can get the same thing.
That is a reasonable approach to my way of thinking because there are no
claims, hidden agendas or esoteric theories being promoted, just a report on
an interesting experiment, even if it is the only working one SO FAR.....
As you know, Keelynet is NOT a global board and was not intended for everyone.
It has always been for people who are serious about this kind of research
(including biology/ecology/gravity, etc.) and wanting to help it come into
practical use through discussions which would lead to experiment and
subsequent reporting of results so that EVERYONE could learn. With minimal
flames, and constructive comments or corrections as warranted.
Anyway, all the posted files are available as always, but I think a bit of
common sense towards their release in a VERY GLOBAL FORUM is warranted. Bruce
Perrault called tonite and said JW McGinnis was upset with me because he heard
I had put out ALL of Perraults material on the InterNet....Bruce read the
newsletter and the COLDFISS file and thought it was JUST GREAT...he said ITS
was very well represented with two phones numbers, the planset number AND a
FAX number and price for ordering, with a RECOMMENDATION to order the FULL
set....this should get far more exposure....so I don't think JW has seen the
ONLY file that was posted, NOT the FULL planset.
I will call him next week and try to straighten this out....even though I
bought the plans from ITS, there was NEVER any intent to post them....only
after Bruce CALLED ME and we talked did he say that he wanted the plans out to
as many people as possible and gave me permission to post the info....which he
confirmed again tonite after reading the file...well, it seems to be a
misunderstanding....
As to FLEXFLO, there will be a lot more interesting information popping up in
1996 based on the interesting phone calls and email that I've been getting
here lately. Looks like this new spate of information is causing many of the
closet researchers to want to throw in their two cents before it is all laid
out and no one ever hears of them because they sat on the information. It's
really great to see it happening.
...............................seeya and Happy Holidays!...>>> Jerry/KeelyNet
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/flexflo.asc
+369
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : FLEXFLO.ASC | Online Date : 12/07/95 |
| Contributed by : Anonymous F/E Guy| Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) |
| Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following text files were sent to KeelyNet anonymously with the intent of
stimulating experiments with this type of circuit. The information is being
honestly presented and believed to be worthy of further investigation. These
circuits have presented anomalies which need to be investigated by many people
and are offered in the spirit of sharing information.
They represent the 'state of the art' as per the contributor and are subject
to revision based on future enhancements or refutations. Please be fair and
constructive in your comments, preferably based on personal experiments.
If you choose to experiment using this information, please share your
observations or findings with KeelyNet and others. Thanks!......>>> Jerry
The files are listed as : FLEXFLO.ASC - this text file
PROOF1.GIF - proof of overunity circuit
FLEXWAT1.GIF - water analog to how FlexFlo works
FLEXFLO1.GIF - simplified conserver circuit
FLEXFLO2.GIF - advanced conserver circuit
FLEXFLO.ZIP - all the above files zipped into one
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Wiseman Theory of Energy Conservation
by
Anonymous F/E Guy
(who takes no credit for this idea)
Concept origin:
George Wiseman
H and A Industries
Rt. 2 Box E-35
Bowling Green, MO 63334
If you are interested in true F/E principles, I recommend that you contact "H
& A Industries" for a catalog of their products. Specifically, order the books
entitled:
"The Energy Conserver Method, Book 1" $15
"The Energy Conserver Method, Book 2" $15
handling $3
---------------------
Total $33
The book money goes into furthering Mr. Wiseman's research which will result
in more info for US to use. Please purchase these books if you are interested
in studying this device. There is much more information contained in the books
that I don't plan to delve into in this extremely short text.
Mr. Wiseman explains his process of experimentation fully and also notes the
many strange effects of his devices. His ideas seem to FULLY explain the true
nature of electricity.
I am in no way affiliated with Mr. Wiseman or H & A Industries, but I do
HIGHLY recommend these books for your personal library.
The principle behind this circuit is simply this:
This circuit takes an initial charge from a power supply or battery (12vdc for
this circuit). That charge is recycled several times through a resistive load
(a bulb, for this demonstration).
The circuit produces the same mysterious "pulsating" lightbulb effect that the
"Sweet Vacuum Triode" and the "Testatika" produce through the bulbs that they
power in their respective videos.
These circuits are ONLY TWO POSSIBLE FORMS for this power recycling. I would
like to encourage anyone who would be kind enough to make this into a solid-
state circuit that the capacitors could simply be "plugged into".
A MOSFET switching device using digital timing for duty-cycles and pulse
frequency would be a fantastic boon for further research using this little
toy. This recycling can be accomplished at any voltage, as long as your
components can handle it. High Voltage arc contacts might be used instead
of solid state switches.
Well, now the rest is up to YOU. Get the books. Study the books. Let's get
this F/E boat rockin'!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Principles of FLEXFLO circuits
Theories and original
circuit concepts
from
" The Energy Conserver Method "
by
George Wiseman
For Complete info, order a catalog from
H & A Industries
Rt. 2 Box e-35
Bowling Green, MO 63334
Mr. Wiseman's books contain much more information than I an provide in this
short text. I highly recommend ordering and reading the "energy conserver"
books.
from
the anonymous F/E guy
see files: PROOF1.GIF
FLEXFLO1.GIF
FLEXFLO2.GIF
FLEXWAT1.GIF
The first and most important principle of these circuits is the understanding
that a resistive 'Load' DOES NOT CONSUME electricity.
This is easily illustrated by examining ANY school text on electrical theory.
They always show several examples. I have emphasized a few points in these
examples to demonstrate my point.
1. Electrons flow from a battery's negative pole, to a batteries positive
pole. ALWAYS. Once the electrons (current) complete the circuit and
enter the positive pole, some of the battery's potential is destroyed.
The more current that flows, the faster the battery goes "dead".
2. Electron flow (current) THROUGH a wire "causes" a magnetic field around
that wire. The field strength is in direct proportion to the amount of
current. The electrons don't DISAPPEAR in the wire. They go IN one end
AND OUT the other.
3. Electron flow THROUGH a bulb produces light and heat. The current does
not DISAPPEAR inside the bulb. The same current flows on both sides of
the filament. The current going into the bulb is the same as the current
that leaves the other side of the bulb.
Nobody ever seems to notice the obvious contradiction between electricity
passing COMPLETELY THROUGH a load and electricity being CONSUMED WITHIN a
load. It has to be one or the other, not both.
Resistive loads only slow down the current, they don't consume it. If they
did, your battery would last longer on devices that consumed more electricity
because the electrons would vanish inside the load and never reach the
positive pole of the battery. In the real world a circuit works like this, one
electron goes in, one electron comes out. That's just the way it works.
The FLEXFLO circuits are designed to hold a volume of electricity and "pour"
it from one bank of capacitors to another bank through a load. If the circuit
in FLEXFLO2.GIF is constructed using standard grade electrolytic capacitors,
it should move approximately 3 to 4 times as much electricity through the load
area than what is actually drawn from the battery. (based on actual circuit
measurements and calculations.)
The Charge of a Capacitor is figured in coulombs:
Q=CE
where:
Q = electric charge (coulombs)
C = capacitance (farads)
E = voltage (V)
A coulomb is a measure of electrical VOLUME contained in a capacitor.
Using this formula with the capacitances and voltages in a circuit, we can
calculate approximately how much energy will move through that circuit.
See Flexflo2.gif in relation to the following example. Measurements taken from
an actual prototype in operation. Energy used for switching was on a separate
circuit and is not used in the calculations.
My prototype used four 110,000uF @ 25v capacitors, Four DPDT relays, one
microswitch to activate relays, one 13.6 volt car battery, and many bits of
colored wire.
C1 and C2 make Bank 1. C3 and C4 make Bank 2.
Step one:
Battery was connected to bring charge across C1 to 13.6 volts. At this point
C1 and C2 are in parallel while C3 and C4 are in series. Battery was then
disconnected.
Total capacitance of Bank 1 is .22 farads @ 13.6 V = 2.992 coulombs
Bank 2 is .055 farads @ 13.6V = .748 coulombs
-------------------------------------------------
Total system charge = 3.740 coulombs
Step two:
C1,C2 placed in series. C3,C4 placed in parallel. This caused a VOLTAGE
imbalance which caused 2.244 coulombs of charge to pass through the load
point to equalize voltages of the two banks.
( 2.992 ) - ( .748 )= 2.244 coulombs moved through load point.
Bank 1 is now .055 farads @ 11.15 volts = .613 coulombs
Bank 2 is now .220 farads @ 11.15 volts = 2.453 coulombs
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total system charge = 3.066 coulombs
At this point the voltage across C3 was measured at 11.15 volts.
Total system charge is now calculated to be 3.066 coulombs. System charge
loss from step 1 to step 2 calculated to be .674 coulombs.
Step three:
C1,C2 placed in parallel. C3,C4 placed in series. This causes another
VOLTAGE imbalance which causes 1.840 coulombs of charge to pass through
the load point in order to equalize voltage potential between the two
banks.
( 2.453 ) - ( .613) = 1.840 coulombs moved through load point.
At this point the voltage across C1 was measured at 8.7 volts.
Total system charge is now calculated to be 2.393 coulombs. System charge
loss from step 2 to step 3 calculated to be .773 coulombs.
Bank 1 is now .220 farad @ 8.7 volts = 1.914 coulombs
Bank 2 is now .055 farad @ 8.7 volts = .479 coulombs
-------------------------------------------------------
Total system charge = 2.393 coulombs
The battery is now connected to recharge C1,C2 through the load, and C3,C4
directly. This moves another 1.078 coulombs through the load point while
charging C1,C2. Total charge taken from battery to recharge whole system
to 13.6 volts is 1.347 coulombs.
( 3.740 ) - ( 2.393 ) = 1.347 coulombs used from battery.
Charge passed through load point:
step 1 = 2.244 coulombs
step 2 = 1.840 coulombs
During Recharge = 1.078 coulombs
------------------------------------
total = 5.162 coulombs
Charge taken from battery = 1.347 coulombs
---------------------------------------------
Over-Unity output = 3.815 coulombs or 383% "efficiency"
Several tests were conducted without any load resistance present in the
circuit (dead short across load point), and several tests were performed with
various types of resistive loads (electromagnet, bulbs, motor).
In every case, the measured charge potentials of the capacitors remained
virtually the same at every testing stage. The fact that purely resistive
loads don't "consume" electricity is shown in the circuit PROOF1.GIF.
Diodes do cause a voltage drop across the load and do lower the measured
voltages by about 1 volt per diode in series with the load.
I attribute the constant voltage drops to mechanical stress loss inside the
capacitors. Many small capacitors in parallel, as opposed to a large single
capacitor, might help offset the losses to a degree.
Bearden spoke of "laboratory grade" capacitors that have almost no internal
stress losses. These might provide a nearly lossless flex circuit.
Since there is a fixed amount of potential loss per cycle, it would be best
to design a load that makes the most use of each charge cycle. I suggest a
self-variable resistor in series with the load to maintain a constant useable
voltage/current through most of the transfer cycle.
The output is a high voltage spike that drops to zero over time in accordance
to load resistance. (20 volts down to 0 volts)
Using V=IR we should be able to construct a solid-state resistor that can be
set at any desired current level so that it will maintain a steady current
through the load during most of the charge cycle.
Bulbs, heater elements and magnets are directly useable without the use of
this variable resistance device.
IDEAS FOR DEVICES:
Build a motor that "flex's" power via the commutator. Collect the C.E.M.F.
from the stator magnets to feed charge back into the system. Use mechanical
torque of motor to drive generator. This motor should only need 4 stator
electromagnets and 2 permanent magnets on the rotor.
Build a "Testatika" device. Wheel is driven by HV pulses through stator
magnets. Leyden jars are arranged as in FLEXFLO2.gif and commutator
directs charges approprietly. Commutator is NOT full contact device; NO
CONTACT FRICTION LOSS! HV spark jumps small gap to transfer charge.
Meanwhile, charge is collected from static generator portion of device.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tapping "Massless Displacement Current"
using a capacitor as a "collector"
by
the anonymous F/E guy
See PROOF1.GIF for circuit diagram
This is a REAL EXPERIMENT that can be performed by anyone using only the
following materials:
- 3 electrolytic capacitors
2 are >50,000uF and one small one for the "collector", 10,000uF
- 12 volt D.C. power source (for charging 1 capacitor)
- A good V.O.M. (digital preferred, or an O-scope)
Connect the two large capacitors as in the circuit in PROOF1.gif. Leave out
the variable resistor. This is where you'll be using the small capacitor.
Leave the "load" point open so that a load can be added in order to complete
the circuit.
Step 1: Make sure C1 and C2 are completely discharged. Charge C1 with the
battery. Check the voltage across C1 and write it down.
Step 2: Short the connection across the load point to allow the charge
from C1 to equalize with C2. Now check the voltage across C1 and
also across C2. They should be the same. Write down the voltage
readings.
Step 3: Repeat step 1. Now, make sure your small cap is discharged. Then,
place it in series in the load point. Remove it from the load
point and check the voltage on it. Now discharge it into a bulb
or something.
Step 4: Place the small cap into the load point a few more times, each
time removing, checking voltage, and discharging it. When it no
longer goes above 0volts you can stop. That means that the
potential differences in C1 and C2 have equalized. Check the
voltage across C1 and then C2. They should be approximately the
same readings that you found in step 2.
This circuit plainly shows that Bearden's "massless displacement current" is a
REAL and TANGIBLE substance. It can be extracted by repeatedly halting a D.C.
circuit with a small, or large, capacitor.
Explanation:
Current flows through a capacitor until it reaches a full charge. The
same current flows on both sides of the capacitor.
The charged capacitor can then be removed from the circuit, the massless
displacement current is drawn off, and the capacitor is then placed back
into the circuit where it fills up again.
The same amount of current flows through the circuit each time. This is a
passive "electrical milking" that can be performed on just about any D.C.
circuit.
If the "milking" was done in microsecond pulses, a normal electronic
circuit would never realize it's happening.
This could mean that many conventional power supplies, heaters, lamps,
etc..., could be made to run with nothing but a single input pulse.
With several stages of the same circuit stacked on top of each other,
many everyday devices could be made self powering.
Well, there you go. I'm no electronic designer. I leave it up to those of
you who can make this into a solid state device of some sort.
Enjoy!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/forcefld.asc
+263
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : FORCEFLD.ASC | Online Date : 12/18/94 |
| Contributed by : Jerry Decker | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following article is the result of a combination of observations triggered
by a chapter in the book, Spontaneous Human Combustion, by Jenny Randles and
Peter Hough. The chapter is "May the Force be With You" and various sections
have been excerpted for this article.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electrostatic Force Fields as the Secret to the Tesla Shield
by Jerry W. Decker
In an old Twilight Zone episode, the story revolved around a mythical place
called Peaceful Valley. A writer, concerned because he was low on gas during
a trip, followed a sign leading to the town of Peaceful Valley. As he went
past the sign, his car suddenly struck something that crumpled the front end
and wrecked the car. There was nothing visible. He was taken into the town
by the concerned citizens. While there, he stumbled on a series of odd events
which ended up with the town elders deciding to tell him about their secret
benefactor from over one hundred years past.
The benefactor was a brilliant scientist who gave them a series of equations
that led to teleportation, creation of matter from energy, reversal of the
time stream and other interesting phenomena. They informed him that his car
had hit an invisible field of force, constructed of tightly bound air
molecules.
The field strength could be so adjusted as to create an invisible wall with a
density equivalent to that of steel or molasses, by thickening the bonds of
the air molecules to the desired density. It was not specified how this was
to be done but I never forgot the concept.
Tesla claimed he had developed an energy shield that could be placed around a
city or to create an impenetrable wall of force. The details were never given
as to how this was to be accomplished, thus leading to much speculation.
In the book, Spontaneous Human Combustion, Randles and Hough are looking into
possible explanations of what actually causes SHC, beginning with ball
lightning and leading into freak electrical accumulations and discharges.
The first anecdote is rather innocuous and appears to have been a fluke,
however, further stories indicate there is much about natural electricity of
which we have only scratched the surface.
A woman trying to enter a new car park in the centre of Durham in 1975
reported the dilemma of finding that an INVISIBLE FORCEFIELD seemed to push
it back (her car). It was as if a giant magnet was resisting all attempts
to squeeze the car into this small area. Yet subsequently local officials
had no trouble at the site and when the woman attempted to repeat her
experience for the TV cameras she also had no more difficulty at all.
You would think other drivers would report the same problem and that the woman
would at least try to get others to try to park or enter in that same location
to see if the repelling effect was unique to her vehicle. That information
was not supplied, so we are simply left with a curious story.
One of the better anecdotes is from an Australian sheep farmer in 1979. It
took place in the Armidale region of New South Wales. The weather was fine
and sunny.
He (the sheep farmer) went out for a look at his sheep - or rather he tried
to do so. Instead his vehicle hit an INVISIBLE BARRIER just like that
claimed by the woman in Durham. This seemed to spread around his 100 acre
farm and although he tried several ways to get out it was AS IF THE AIR WAS
SOLID and was preventing movement beyond a certain point. He attempted
walking and it was reputedly equivalent to stepping into a 'plastic wall'.
Evidently there was no problem with electricity supplies REACHING the
farmhouse, but this may be because the field was intermittent. It was there
for a minute or so, then it DISAPPEARED only to return some minutes later
when he tried another escape. After forty-eight hours the effect
disappeared for good and never returned. Apparently the farmer was so
disturbed by this that it took him several months to return to any sort of
normal life.
It is difficult to imagine a ring of force that could cover a 100 acre farm,
but since the farmer tried several routes to leave and was stopped, it must
have been so. Does this tell us anything about the shape of the field?
In another story, a moving forcefield barrier was reported by an engineering
student from Hampshire in June 1935.
He was on a farm at Osmaston, Derbyshire with two friends. At about 11PM,
they were walking towards the road to catch the late bus back to Ashbourne.
Suddenly there was a crunching sound, as if something was touching the
gravel on the path. This came up behind them, the noise stopped and the
invisible field of energy literally PASSED THROUGH THEM.
The physical sensations that were felt by the men were a deep clamminess and
also their hair stood on end, suggesting that an electrostatic field was
involved. There was also a brief muscle paralysis.
This is reminiscent of the effects associated with ghostly encounters. The
clamminess (temperature differential from ambient), the slight muscle
paralysis (suppression of muscle tone) and hair standing on end as happens
with animals and humans when frightened or excited.
A further account by the same engineer in August 1938 took place when the sky
was overcast with slight sunlight filtering through.
....he became aware of a dark SWIRLING cloud, almost like a tornado WITHOUT
THE VORTEX TUBE. It was already overhead and an intense oppressive
sensation was filling the air. Within moments it was surrounding the man on
his bicycle and a high-pitched 'piping' noise was filling his ears. After a
few seconds it simply vanished.
With the benefit of fifty years experience the engineer now suspects that
the metal bicycle traversing a lonely moor was a perfect attraction for an
energy cloud of IONIZED AIR. How it was generated is quite another matter.
The authors then suggest that such ionized columns of air, having sufficient
velocity could produce the crop circles so en vogue in the past few years.
This was suggested as being a Star Wars test by the author of this paper back
in 1990 and detailed in a file listed on KeelyNet as CIRCLES1.ASC.
The most fascinating story of all is detailed on pages 161 and 162 of the
book. It deals with an apparently ionized vortex.
A very interesting observation of what seems to have been one of these
energy fields or ionized vortices was made by Mr. R. Roberts of Kent. It
occurred in July 1966 and is potentially very significant.
He was in a van on the old road from St. Margarets Bay to Dover when a sheet
of intense rain hit the windscreen and forced him to a halt. On his side he
had a better view of an isolated field of rough grass with some derelict
IRON-CLAD BUILDINGS - he thinks probably remnants from First World War sea
defences. Some cows were in the field nearby.
Suddenly a loud HISSING SOUND began. The cows heard it and looked around at
once. Expecting to see a lightning strike fell the cattle, instead Mr.
Roberts was to be amazed. A VERTICAL TUBE of some TWELVE FEET IN DIAMETER
was there as if from nowhere. It had the appearance of glass or plastic but
was really ONLY VISIBLE because of his close proximity and the weird effect
it had on the downpour. This was striking the side of the tube and running
down AS IF IT WERE SOLID. No water was getting INSIDE the created TUBULAR
ZONE at all!
In other words, the vortex was producing a CIRCULAR FORCEFIELD and
preventing the rain from intruding. He could see that inside the region the
grass was PRESSED FLAT to the ground and was apparently DRY. It was as if
someone had placed a giant glass beaker over the landscape.
Unfortunately, Mr. Roberts did not see how the thing DISAPPEARED.
FASCINATING! The appearance of the tube was preceded by a loud hissing sound,
is this LEAKAGE or ACCUMULATION of electrostatic energy? And it was in a
circular pattern that appeared to HAVE WEIGHT. This would lend credence to
the hypothesis that the air density within this area was greater than ambient,
thus creating a heavier zone of air to press the grass down..
One final story from the chapter deals with a mysterious bubble of force that
again indicates a closer molecular coupling of the air molecules.
Two young girls were throwing a plastic frisbee back and forth when it
apparently struck 'some invisible force' and reversed its course
immediately. It was like hitting a BRICK WALL that was NOT THERE.
Following this the two girls found themselves surrounded by a 'yellow
bubble' - seemingly akin to the vortex tube described by Mr. Roberts in
Kent. From their perspective INSIDE the tube the girls were able to offer
an account of its effects. They were hit by a force that they describe as a
MILD ELECTRIC SHOCK and were THROWN to the ground by its strength.
They also found it DIFFICULT TO BREATHE, possibly because the air was
actually more RAREFIED WITHIN THE FIELD. Fortunately they did not stay
inside until the air ran out (as it may well have done in time) but rushed
forward and 'broke through' the wall of the 'bubble' to escape.
There is reason to believe that the air could indeed have been rarefied,
simply by the fact that properly polarized ions are known to displace oxygen.
However, I am of the opinion that high density electrostatic coupling of the
air molecules would make it difficult to breathe in such a dense environment,
much like scuba diving at 100 feet.
One other correlation is a story related by Bruce Cathie in his book, The
Energy Grid, Harmonic 695. The story was in the form of a letter to Mr.
Cathie where a 'new Australian' writes of an odd thing he'd witnessed in a
canyon at the base of a cliff. It appeared to be a greyish-green object
underneath an overhanging cliff.
...I satisfied myself that it must have been something created by the light,
but realised that the sun didn't reach down to the bottom of the canyon. To
make sure, I picked up a pebble, and threw it to where I supposed the object
to be. The result was the stone was STOPPED IN MID-AIR, or when it HIT the
object. It then SLID DOWN TO THE GROUND, and on impact with the rocky
ground the stone made a noise; although there had been NO NOISE when it
STOPPED IN MID-AIR.
...the next day I returned and found the object was again visible. I had
brought with me a long piece of fencing wire and my transistor radio. I
started to yell and to make my presence known to whatever it was, and I
admit I felt an idiot doing so, but nothing happened. Then I switched my
transistor radio on, and when music came from it, the object started to
react. I watched it closely. The object GRADUALLY FADED AWAY, but the
process was so slow that it was hard to say exactly when it became
invisible.
I had brought the fencing wire with me to find out if the object were an
electric phenomenon. I tied this long wire to a stick and reached into the
nothingness. Then with a match soaked in saliva and wiped, I touch the
wire. Had the object been electrical, I should have felt a slight tingle in
my fingers, but I did not.
Gaining confidence I took hold of the wire with my hands, but still I could
FEEL NOTHING. When I clamped my teeth on the end of the wire and touched it
with my tongue, I COULD FEEL some RHYTHMICAL VIBRATION coming through the
wire.
The vibration SEEMED TO CHANGE IN RHYTHM when one yelled, played music or
threw a stone towards the invisible object. But even without ANY NOISE, a
VIBRATION kept coming from it.
The underside of the overhanging shelf seemed to SWEAT; it is moist whereas
the whole area including the canyon is BONE DRY.
Is this yet another clue? That of vibration? If the field is electrostatic
in the normal understanding, then would not the wire short out the field?
That is UNLESS there is some kind of COHERENT MATRIX where the electrostatic
energy is more on a micro level than a macro. Vibration could possibly
SUSTAIN SUCH A MATRIX to produce the INTENSE ELECTROSTATIC COUPLING of air
molecules necessary to produce an invisible wall.
Anyone who has ever worked around high voltage, has noticed the static charge
accumulations on the body. It has been described as feeling like cobwebs.
Based on the above accounts, it makes sense that a very high density
electrostatic field that was TUNED to one or more of the air molecules, could
impart energy sufficient to cause the molecules to bond with a tighter
coupling. Since nitrogen accounts for 78% of the atmosphere, it would follow
that nitrogen would be an excellent choice to experiment with.
Multiple questions arise as to HOW to achieve this result. Since it appears
in nature, there must be some common observations that would help us to
duplicate it in experimental situations.
The fact that a vortex is involved, combined with the binding forces of a
rapidly rotating torus, or as the spherical energy form known as a soliton, we
have serious clues as to how to duplicate the effect in a controlled
situation.
Electrostatic fields can be generated as oscillatory (AC using Tesla type
coils) or static (DC using Wimshurst or Van de Graff generators). To my
knowledge, the field densities have not been restricted into a very tight
space as seem to be the case with the above observations.
Perhaps there is an expansion of the electron shells, followed by a rapid
compression, to produce the process known as fractioning. In such a case, the
energy would be squeezed into a tighter space, much like Ken Shoulders' charge
clusters. Other options include self-organizing fields, vibrationally induced
and sustained solitons, very rapidly rotating electrostatic energy in the form
of a tightly bound torus, etc..
I think we have an excellent starting point with these correlations to show
that such a force field is indeed possible. There are no doubt other
correlations which I hope others will share with us here at KeelyNet. They
will be either appended to this document or collected into a second file as
they are received.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/free-n1.asc
+960
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,960 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : FREE-N1.ASC | Online Date : 11/06/94 |
| Contributed by : Bill Beaty | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
This is a the first part of a two part file (FREE-N1 and FREE-N2).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Energy, Theory, Devices and Progess
Senthil R. Kumar (SRK106@psuvm.psu.edu) Tue, 2 Nov 1993
by Patrick G. Bailey, Ph. D.
P.O. Box 201
Los Altos, CA 94023-0201
Presented to : the International Forum on New Science
1304 S. College Avenue
Ft. Colins, CO 80524
(303) 482-3731
September 19, 1992
A review is presented of the theory and experimental evidence relating to Zero
Point Energy and Free Energy Devices. This review is based on a two year
study of the information and data available in these fields, and also upon the
information presented by various key researchers in these fields at three
recent conferences. It is found that there is increasing momentum and a
growing network of researchers taking place in these fields, despite reported
efforts to suppress this information. Examples of such past and present
suppression activities are included. Nevertheless, sound theoretical
foundations for understanding so-called "Zero Point Energy" and "Free Energy"
devices have been documented and are available. There are several reports by
various authors of experiments that indicate a much higher than normal
operation efficiency, and even over-unity operation. Unfortunately, these
results have to date not been replicated by other researchers.
Since energy is conserved, pure perpetual motion cannot exist. However,
several examples are known to exist where energy efficiency can appear to be
over-unity, and the motion can appear to us to be perpetual. For these types
of systems, the idea of "Free Energy" can be applied, and lessons learned.
Several experiments are discussed that have demonstrated the possibility of
obtaining energy from space, and utilizing that energy in a way different from
the normal laws of electricity. These experiments and results are being
tracked down and closely examined. Valuable references with real mailing
addresses and telephone numbers are included herein. Replications of these
encouraging results are desperately needed.
Introduction
"Let God kill him that does not know, yet presumes to show the other the way!"
This quote from a Persian dervish in the movie and videotape of "Meetings with
Remarkable Men" by Gurdjieff (1963) pretty much summarizes my feelings toward
the whole area of science, and living as well. It's a jungle out there. The
dividing line between truth, fiction, what is best, and what sells has never
been less clearly defined. Since the advent of the digital information
explosion, the sea of information has been growing at a pace that few can
follow. However, if we are to be responsible and seek the truth, we must
persevere. I am dedicated to finding the truth. My fields of interest are
Nature, religion, and science, and their beneficial applications to the human
race.
To learn about the foundations and current technical knowledge in the Zero
Point and Free Energy fields is to open a very large Pandora's Box. One finds
non-believers, strong supporters, dissenters, and active hard-nosed
suppressers. My interest was aroused as a teenager by reading about the life
and contributions of Nikola Tesla, now available in the books by Walters
(1961) and Cheney (1981). He is the one individual responsible for creating
the entire alternating current network that powers the world today. He defied
the science of his day, and designed and built the AC generator that
transforms "potential" energy into "electrical" energy. Yet, he is not in
many school texts, and his basic theories and ideas for larger projects and
applications were nearly lost to the world. Why was he not supported? Why is
Thomas Edison such a well known name and Nikola Tesla is not? Why was his
research not actively continued? Why does the academic community, within the
US, continually ignore the possible applications of his theories?
Tesla was unceremoniously thrown out of the best technical school in
Yugoslavia for believing that he could build a generator that would extract
electrical power from a running stream of water. His professor called it:
"Perpetual Motion!" This is not so unfamiliar. We have heard other such
convenient explanations, such as: "Heavier than air machines will never fly"
(Lord Kelvin, 1890s); "We threw out all of the textbooks, and then we built
the airplane" (the Wright Brothers); "The human body will not survive speeds
of over 40 miles per hour" (early 1900s); and "Airplanes can not go faster
than the speed of sound" (1940s). Other example abound, all spoken by the
out-spoken "leaders" of their day. My view is that science continues to grow
and mature. Nature is fixed. Only our understanding of Nature continually
unfolds. Sometimes this growth has been only painful, and sometimes it has
provided great shocks to the system. Fear of change is not an adequate excuse
for not actively pursuing the development of our full capabilities as human
beings, as individuals or as groups.
Areas Of Related Interest
The study of the "Free Energy" field overlaps with quite a number of other
areas of science and technology that are not well understood, and are usually
called "fringe areas." I believe that responsible investigations in these
areas do uncover important information and data that can relate to various
questions that occur in the study of Free Energy. These questions include:
Why is this research not conducted? Is it suppressed? Why is it suppressed?
Are there other examples of such suppression? Where can I get more
information? Are there any examples of such advanced related technologies?
If such energy sources exist, has anyone found out how to use them? How do
they work? Can I use them, and can I use them in a responsible manner?
There is a great outcry by those familiar with our current energy policy and
the public electricity utility network for need of a new breakthrough in the
technology of energy production. Dr. Gary Johnson (1992), a college professor
and IEEE Senior Member, recently published a short review of the researchers
in this area in a noted US technical journal and concluded his four page
report with the statement:
"There is a great deal of noise in the literature. Some concepts are
obviously nonsense. Others will prove to be in error. But is there any
signal in all the noise? There is if Tesla, Moray, and Bearden are correct.
The potential payoff is enormous, so the search should be continued if there
is any chance at all of success."
Also, Llewellen King (1991), publisher of The Energy Daily, Defense Week, and
Environmental Week Newsletters in Washington DC recently strongly and
dramatically stated in a speech to an international technical conference:
"We have failed with energy to come up with the 'Great Big Breakthrough!'
'The Major Change.' 'The Radically Different Thing.' 'The Quantum Leap
Forward.' Where is the jump from a copper wire to a fiber or to a cable?
Where is the equivalent of fiber optics for electricity? ... The new
technologies (discussed at this conference), such as magnetohydrodynamics,
(are advancing and coming forth), and yet these things have not fostered - and
we are still boiling water! It is theoretically possible that we could at
some point take this 'Quantum Leap Forward.' ... And in order to do that, I
believe that you will need new institutions to deploy new technology. They
won't be deployed by the extant of the old institutions. ... The Challenge in
Technology is to find It, and then sell It, and finally to deploy It."
Since the status and results in energy technologies and in these other fringe
areas are seen differently by different persons, many misunderstandings take
place, people become frustrated, emotions become heated, and eventually
someone gets sorely offended. People can range from Apathy, to Denial, to
Anger, and finally to Acceptance. So as to not offend anyone in this paper, I
will limit the areas of my summary introduction investigations to Politics,
Religion, and Sex.
Politics
"Never give a sucker an even break." I became very concerned when I became
aware of first hand and second hand accounts of actual physical, emotional,
and legal harassment being made to inventors, investigators, and writers in
these scientific fringe areas. And I thought all of these suppression stories
were nonsense. Upon investigation, harassment always follows those who
promote a new paradigm. Galileo spent a lot of time in jail. So did Royal
Rife, who demonstrated a cure for cancer in the 1930s, summarized in the books
written by Barry Lyons (1989, 1989), published, of course, in Canada.
Christopher Bird (1991) writes of the persecution of Gaston Naessens for his
radical and effective treatments of diseases. America West Publishers has
available many books that list actions that have been taken by various
authorities to diffuse or bury "politically embarrassing" events and
situations. Paul Findley wrote a best seller (1985) that summarizes the
effectiveness of large political pressure groups. Fortunately today, there
are many who do not conform to the "party line" in many political areas, such
as the "Center for Action" in Nevada. In the area of AIDS research and
information transfer, Dr. Robert Strecker has produced a videotape (1988) and
Dr. Taki Anagnoston (1991) has published a book that promotes a view far
different than is advertised nationally to the American people. "The Cutting
Edge Newsletter" by William Douglass also serves as a source for alternate
information.
In my view, there is not a determined effort by the government to suppress
information - because there is no government. I see instead a collection and
network of vested interest groups that seem to tightly band together for
mutual financial survival. The actions taken by any of these groups may be
completely independent from the others. Therefore, I find the "government
suppression" and "world domination" theories proposed by some to be
interesting, and probably not applicable. However, some sort of control and
suppression in the press seems very evident. Coleman (1992) has summarized
that certain groups are actively controlling all other groups. The "Project
Censored Newsletter" and their student staff at Sonoma State University, CA,
are actively pointing out US news stories that seem to be actively suppressed
in this country. So, how does this all relate to the topic of Free Energy?
Ken MacNeill (1983) published a very disturbing article entitled "Insights
into the Proprietary Syndrome" in which he points out that over 3,000 patents
have been suppressed! It is reprinted in the Appendix of this paper. Read
it!
Two historical events are worth including here regarding possible suppression
and inability to commercialize Free Energy devices. These are the Over-Unity
Device of T. Henry Moray (Resines, 1988), and the Hindershot Motor (Brown,
1988). Both of these devices were publicly demonstrated to the US press in
the 1930s, and carefully conducted tests were made to assess these devices.
From the newspaper reports and clippings, it appears that both devices passed
all tests, only to fall into oblivion. What exactly happened to the devices,
their inventors, and the technology is not known. It also appears that the
secrets of the devices died with their inventors.
If information deemed sensitive by certain governmental agencies can be
actively suppressed, then what are the other possible ways of obtaining such
information? One method that has gained popularity in recent years is through
the use of channeling.
Religion
"Ask and you shall receive". I was surprised to hear that a grandmother
("dharma") who said she could channel Nikola Tesla had been given a formal
test in front of some very influential people in Los Angles, and she passed
the test with very few errors. I was told that the questions were prepared by
a small knowledgeable group, and about half of the questions were reported to
be trick questions. Well, if this method can work to get advanced technical
information let's try it. After all, where do our ideas come from in the
first place? Both Tesla and Edison are reported to have made their respective
amazing discoveries while daydreaming - not actually thinking!
Upon investigation, there is a morass of spiritual and channeled information
being published out there. From my point of view, it is all applicable to a
person, depending upon where that person is at in his life, and of course it
is not all true, applicable, or valid information. The magazine "Connecting
Link" summarizes a lot of this information. Just for purposes of reference, I
will list the names of those channeled intelligences that I have researched,
by either reading their communications or personally conversing with them
through their physical host. (The references are organized by the name of the
intelligence, or collective intelligence, with the name of the host or
channeler in parentheses.) From what I currently know, I give this list is
given in order of increasing importance to me for personal information
transfer:
Ramtha, Lazaris, Seth, Bashar, Korton, Ashtar, Soltec, Cosmic Awareness, The
Pleiadians, Hatonn, Ra, Hilarion, St. Germain, Thoth, Mary, Sananda, Aton.
To me, any information is valid only when it constructively supports or fits
into the puzzle that I am trying to solve. What is valid for each person
varies with each person, and their puzzle of the moment. I have noticed that
I receive more valid information from hosts who are in unconscious trance
during the communications. If the host can remember anything of the
communication, I feel there is always the possibility of tampering with the
information during reception and transmission, thus producing "tainted"
information. This has historically occurred with many popularized channelers
that have elected to use their talents and such communications primarily for
their personal profit.
Also, I find one needs to separate the substance of the message from any given
dates. To hear an intelligence say that "at this time a truck is gathering
speed and is coming this way that will cross this intersection here in three
hours," does not necessarily mean the truck will ever get there. If it does,
great. Then that is a measure of predictability. If not, so what! Was that
the point? Neither of these issues is demonstrable science. I find it is
best to gather the substance of the information and relate it to my puzzles.
Those that believe and act on all of the details of every channeled
communication may be in for quite a shock, as described in the book When
Prophecy Fails by Festinger, Riecken, and Schachter (1956).
I do know that some of the channeled information recently received is
extremely accurate. A case in point is the book channeled by Sananda through
"dharma" (1989) regarding the life of Jesus . While persons affiliated with
America West Publishers, then in southern California, were trying to decipher
the German text of the first few chapters of this material (originally
translated into German from the Aramaic script found in 1963) with very little
success, a complete translation in English was given in 1989 through "dharma"
by Sananda (1989). Two years later, the original German manuscript was
translated by J. H. Ziegler and B. L. Greene, authored by Rashid (1992), and
published by Wild Flower Press in Oregon. Neither party knew of the existence
of the other until after the material was typeset. The contents are nearly
identical. I can personally attest to other cases of receiving extremely
accurate information and being allowed to be involved in "unexplainable"
physical events.
Whether one needs to be out-of-body to receive information, I am not sure.
Robert Monroe (1971, 1985) has spent years in this field with the Monroe
Institute in Virginia, and he and his co-workers have all received personal
knowledge. I do not know if they have received any higher technical knowledge
that is of interest here. J. J. Hurtak (1978) received a vast amount of
technical knowledge out-of-body when he channeled the extensive work The Keys
of Enoch.
Why haven't these intelligences just given us the secrets of advanced
technology on a silver platter? I don't know. Perhaps we as a collective
society are not ready for it. Some technical information is being given out
from these intelligences and is slowly being published. Perhaps, as Hatonn,
The Pleiadians, and other intelligences have suggested: that if we told you
that, then "they" would kill our vehicle. Perhaps, waiting is.
Perhaps the goal of life is not to pursue the engineering of an easier life
style solely for the comfort of living our lives through technology, but to
finally realize what our personal mission here is, to become in touch with
that mission, and then to perform that mission. That phrase from college:
"God has a plan for my life" makes very good sense here. The problem actually
may be that most of us are not taking the time to find out what our personal
mission is, and how to responsibly perform it. If you wish to pursue this,
the most Holy course, I highly recommend the books by Dion Fortune (1957),
Gaetan Delaforge (1987), and Fred and Pam Cameron (1991). The latter book,
Bridges of Light, includes step-by-step instructions, all specifically
channeled, on how you can receive your own accurate information. So Be It.
Sex
"It takes two to Tango." Potentially, things are very interesting. It seems
to take two at different potentials to make something happen: male/female,
up/down, positive/negative, north/south. The view being taught today is
primarily simply given in one or two dimensions. Electricity is caused by the
electrons going one way on a wire, and the holes going the other way.
Electrical energy is created by chemical reactions that have a lower chemical
ground state than the reactants. Chemical reactions are caused by electron
bonding where electron orbits are finally filled and then higher orbits can be
filled. Atomic energy is caused by electrons and nucleons dropping into lower
energy states (gamma rays and lasers), or by differences in the binding energy
of the nuclei (fission and fusion). The Sun gives and the Earth receives.
For energy creation, we have developed the catch-all term: potential energy.
The water behind a dam is said to have a great deal of potential energy, so
the electricity is said to come out of the power plant. A battery has a
stored electrical potential, so it powers your radio. Men and women all have
stored potential, and we all know what trouble that can cause. However; no
one ever talks about magnets, and the possible potential energies within
magnets and electromagnetic fields. Light is such an electromagnetic (EM)
field. The motions of the electrical component and the magnetic component of
alternating current, similar to light, are three-dimensional as they travel
along a wire, and at several points, each is zero. Where did they go? How is
EM energy stored and transmitted? Can usable amounts of energy be extracted
from already existing large and massive EM fields?
I have found only two sources that reference the modeling of EM fields in
three spatial dimensions: the works of Walter Russell (1926, 1947, 1989), and
material channeled by Hatonn et. al. (1991). The idea that energy exists in
male and female vortices that form between this dimension and other dimensions
is not new. The idea just hasn't been very useful, yet. Russell and Hatonn
describe three dimensional elemental EM fields that can be classified as male
and female by the spin of their 3-D EM fields, much the same way that we
describe the poles of a bar magnet. Russell developed and tested counter-
wound sets of coils, each in the shape of overlapping (male/female) cones.
Such a coupling and cancellation of these fields would open up a whole new way
of thinking about electricity and EM fields in general. Also, a new
investigation of the physics of rotating permanent magnets and rotating EM
fields would be very interesting. All reported research in these fields seems
to stop in the early 1950s. I wonder why.
UFOs and Crop Circles
"We are living in Lies." This statement was made by both Colin Andrews and
Linda Moulton-Howe during their presentations during the Whole Life Expo (WLE)
in San Francisco, April 1991. It speaks for itself. If examples of advanced
technology are being demonstrated all around us nearly every day, shouldn't we
be interested? Well, if it does not impact our daily life, and our personal
finances, maybe we don't care. We could say, let the government figure it
out. Well, evidently, "they" don't, can't, or won't care. Besides, what you
don't know won't hurt you. Right? However; it may stunt your growth.
If you really want to know, you are going to have to rely on yourself. This
is all very interesting to me, because it allows for the possibility of
several examples of advanced technology here and now. And from my
experiences, these phenomena are real, reoccurring, and getting more numerous
and in-your-face outrageous all the time.
Without diverting from our main topic for too long, I will list the best
sources of UFO craft pictures and crop geometrical formation material I have
found. (They are not just dots in the sky, and circles, any more. Sorry.)
The UFO craft pictures began in the 1950s with those taken by George Adamski
and published in his book in by Leslie in 1953. (These pictures could have
been faked, and I recall someone telling me that Adamski was said to have
declared his whole photograph library a fraud on his death bed; and I do not
know.) The pictures taken and thousands of sightings reported in the New York
Hudson Valley region in the 1980s cannot be denied (Hynek, 1987). Pictures
from around the world have been compiled in two books by Wendelle Stevens and
August Roberts (1985). Other UFO book sources are listed. And, the UFO Video
Clearinghouse in California has just about all the movie footage and video
taken of UFOs and TV programs produced that are available world-wide. "UFO's
the Best Evidence" is a two-hour video produced by KLAS, Channel 6 in Las
Vegas, that should be seen by everyone!
Close-up photographs, movie footage, and videotapes are much more disturbing
to some people than the usual lights in the sky. The photographs by Billy
Meier in Volume 1 of the books by Elders (1979) are apparently all actual
photographs of large disk craft. (I was told that a few of the pictures in
Volume 2 (1983) were of models that were made in order to compare to Meier's
craft photographs, and then the photos were inadvertently mixed). For those
that disagree with this, I recommend that you carefully read the technical
photographic analyses in Volume 1 that were performed on some of the photos by
disinterested scientists in the US using electron microscopes, laser scanning,
and computer analyses and enhancements; and then read the book by Gary Kinder
(1987), who set out to visit Meier, his family, and the people in the local
community there in Switzerland in order to prove the Meier story a hoax.
Also, we have the pictures from Gulf Breeze, Florida, in the book by Ed and
Francis Walters (1990). (Some say they faked the pictures, but not to the
hundreds of local eye witnesses that claimed to have seen the same thing,
including most of the city officials.)
Robert (Bob) Lazar presents an interesting story in his videotape (1992) of
how he became involved with some disk craft while working in the power
propulsion area. His story is summarized as one of the six viewpoints in the
book by Lindemann (1991), as is Linda Moulton-Howe's. Lazar states that the
craft he worked on were powered by a matter- antimatter (potential energy)
reaction with a near-stable element of an atomic number of 115, which has not
yet been found or produced on Earth. Such a nuclide could give off power in a
manner similar to Cobalt-60, which emits very high energy and deadly gamma
radiation, thus the need for lead shielding in nuclear fission power plants.
How the El-115 power would be utilized is unknown. More to the point, how
would such craft be able to levitate above the Earth? Perhaps it could
utilize an interaction of engineered variable frequency EM fields with the
Earth's local gravity and EM fields. That could explain the very complex and
time-dependent harmonics found by expert sound researchers when they analyzed
the sound of a hovering craft as recorded on audio tape by Meier while making
movies of a craft. These are all available.
For additional information regarding what these craft are, who are coming, and
why, I would recommend the material from Stanton Friedman (1991) and Sananda
(1989). Additional viewpoints are found in the book by Lindemann (1991) and
in the transcription of the wonderful talk given by Linda Moulton-Howe at the
April 1991 SF WLE. It appears we are being visited by more than 50 alien
cultures on the physical plane, all different, yet related, each having their
own version of their "sports car or RV," and each with their own purposes and
motivations. It also appears that this is nothing new, has been going on for
what appears to be a very, very long time, and so what! What is interesting
is the apparent lack of advanced technology transfer, which could be likened
to a possible violation of the "Prime Non-Interference Directive" popularized
in Star Trek. Unless such advanced data is being given to the privileged few.
Unless we, in the US and in other parts of the world, as individual societies
are being allowed the information as fast as we can (financially) safely
absorb it and properly utilize it for our benefit and not our mutual
destruction. That is what I would hope. That is where I want to be.
The crop formations are another and perhaps a more advanced topic altogether.
The books by Colin Andrews (1989), Alick Bartholomew (1991), and Ralph Noyes
(1990) stimulate the imagination. As Colin would say: "I'm sorry. It just
isn't Doug and Dave, as the British Press would have you believe!" These
formations have become quite complex, such as the Barbury Castle formation
that appeared overnight in July 1991. It contains three "circles" of about 35
feet in diameter located at the apex of a nearly equilateral triangle that
measures about 180 feet on a side, with three internal circles and spokes
within the triangle. I highly recommend Colin Andrew's (1991) videotape
"Undeniable Evidence."
Background Material
It is important that I include as much quality reference material as I am
able. These areas of interest have grown so large and confusing that it is
difficult to know where to turn for the best or most meaningful information.
So I will include a list of the most applicable patents, the best books,
reports, conference proceedings, and the most up-to-date papers that I know of
in the Zero Point Energy and Free Energy fields. I also have included in the
references the complete names and addresses of several technical societies,
groups, and book sources.
Patents
There are several patents of phenomena and devices that are of interest.
Rather than discuss them here, I will list them in the references. They may
be referred to later.
It is important to note that you can quickly obtain any patent from a local US
patent clearinghouse, such as the one in Sunnyvale, California, by a telephone
call or a FAX once an account has been set up for you. If you are not in a
hurry, you can order a copy of any patent for $3.00 (three dollars) each from
the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks in Washington DC, although it may
take 2-6 weeks. Just provide the long patent number.
Books and Reports
Many books and reports have been published that relate to the Free Energy
fields. I have listed the ones I have looked at in the references in this
section. I have included all of Lt. Col. Tom Bearden's books and reports. It
should be pointed out that Tom's book entitled AIDS: Biological Warfare
(1988) probably has the best description of the pumped phase conjugate mirror
wave theory model of any of his books. The book by Moray B. King (1989) gives
an excellent overview of the definition of Zero Point Energy. Several books
and reports have recently emerged regarding gravity and the Earth's apparent
energy grid network. Books regarding the Orgonne Accumulator and ether vortex
mechanics are also included. The book by Hans Nieper (1981) is a great
reference book, and sometimes hard to find: use the source listed. The
theories promoted by Richard Hoagland and the Mars Mission are also
interesting, including the fact that a solid tetrahedron placed in a sphere
will intersect the sphere at 19.5 degrees latitude, which is the same Earth
latitude upon which Tesla was constructing his Wardenclyffe Tower in New York.
The theories of Victor Schauberger (Alexandersson, 1982) are also very
interesting, including his descriptions of Natural energy vortices, the
changing properties of 4 degree C water with the phases of the moon, as
descriptions of other Natural wonders.
Conferences
I am familiar with only a few of the many technical conferences held that deal
with the Zero Point and Free Energy fields. The one's I have recently
attended are the 26th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference
(IECEC), held in August 1991 in Boston, MA; the 1992 International Tesla
Symposium, held in July 1992 in Colorado Springs, CO; and the 27th IECEC held
in August 1992 in San Diego, CA. As I organized the authors and papers for
both the 26th and 27th IECECs in the "Innovative Concepts" sessions for the
"New Technologies for Energy Utilization Area," I am more familiar with their
papers and contents. The material presented in other conferences, such as the
bi- annual International Tesla Society conferences, do relate and overlap
with much of the material presented in the recent IECEC conferences. It is my
desire that future authors will network and exchange information before they
write their next paper, so we can accelerate and converge the work that is
being performed in these fields.
Societies and Publications
All the ones that I feel are of importance are listed in the references for
your use. Make multiple photocopies of all of the six pages of the references
and distribute them.
Free Energy Theory, Experiments, and Devices
"Come on, let me show you where it's at." Well, I can show you what I have
been able to find out from the referenced sources within the past three years
anyway. I have learned that there is a lot of very sound scientific theory
that supports the existence of additional energy sources, ways of interacting
with those potential energies, and extracting energy for use. There is also a
lot of experiments, devices, and just good ol' fooling around going across the
country to try to measure new ways of measuring these new energy sources.
There are also devices that have been built, tested, demonstrated, and
provided for testing by others - that seem to have passed all of the tests.
These will be discussed below. First some truths and definitions.
Energy exists. It can not be created nor destroyed. Energy can only be
converted from one form into another. In that conversion process, some energy
is lost, in the form of friction or heat, so the efficiency of the energy
transfer process is always less than 100 percent. The process (you can
envision a box) will always give less energy out than energy goes in. The
ratio of "energy out" to "energy in" is always less than one: under-unity.
An over-unity device cannot exist. Perpetual motion does not exist. All
motion eventually will run down. (Whether you live to be here when it does
run down is another matter.) So, let's see. A car battery is a good example.
It has so much energy to start with, and it eventually runs down from starting
the starter motor and friction in the wire. Draw a larger box. The car runs
and recharges the battery because the engine converts the potential energy
within the fuel during combustion into crankshaft motion, which is then used
to recharge the battery, until it runs out of gas. Draw a larger box. The
car can go downhill with the engine off by transforming the potential energy
of the hill into kinetic or moving energy at the bottom of the hill. OK. But
what about Hoover Dam? It just sits there and creates energy. We don't put
any energy into it, except when we built it. And we sure didn't put as much
energy into it as we have gotten out of it. And it for sure is not going to
last forever. But it's doing just fine now. So is that an example of a Free
Energy device with an energy conversion factor of over-unity? Yes or No?
To handle such mind benders, workers in the Zero Point and Free Energy fields
have, for better or worse, and probably for the near term worse, have adopted
a simple way of describing the results of their research, in terms of what
they can immediately measure and see. So there are three categories that are
generally expounded upon: "Free Energy Under-unity," "Free Energy, Over-
unity," and "Zero Point Energy." (1) "Free Energy Under-unity" would be when
I get more energy out than before and I only made a small change to my design,
like to increase the overall system efficiency. An example might be those
magnets that when placed onto a car gas line give 5 miles extra per gallon.
That's Free Energy dude! This appears to be the case for several motors and
generators that utilize magnets on their rotating shafts. (2) "Free Energy
Over-unity" would be where I seem to get more energy out than I know am
putting in. Period. An example would be pushing a car over the top of a
hill. When it takes off without you, it appears additional energy is coming
from somewhere. And, in all cases, of such experiments, the energy MUST be
coming from somewhere in some form. It just hasn't been figured out yet, and
the researcher has probably not drawn a large enough box. (3) "Zero Point
Energy" refers to the energy that comes from outside your influence: the
wiring in the wall; the transmission lines nearby; a large EM signal on a
specific FM radio station; the Earth's EM or gravitational field; solar EM
energy; or possibly directed energy from outer space. Just because we can't
measure it, doesn't mean it's not there.
With these definitions in mind, we see that Hoover Dam is a good example and
could be considered by some Dam Engineer to be an over-unity device. A good
Dam Scientist would probably point out that the Sun evaporates the oceans and
lakes, moves the vapor, makes the rain that fills the Dam, and the potential
energy of the water produces the electrical power. The Dam Engineer could
probably care less, and could also say that the Dam is a perpetual motion
machine that will last forever; which means at least until he retires and his
kids are out of college. The Dam Engineer would say: "The Dam thing runs on
Free Energy out of the air! The city of Los Angles believes it!" But: you
know it won't last forever. Neither will the Sun.
So we need to be careful in our choice of words. For the purposes of this
paper, a Free Energy device will appear to produce more energy than it uses,
because it is not known from what form of potential energy source the other
required input energy comes from. Thus, we will allow system efficiencies
over 100%, and over-unity energy conversion until we are either proven wrong,
or we finally draw a larger box and understand what is happening inside that
box.
It is very important here to be a Fair Witness. (Thank you Robert Heinlein!)
That is a person who reports exactly what he or she sees; no more, no less.
Researchers and investors really do not give a (guess what) about what you
think is going on. They want the facts of exactly what you observed. If a
device appears to be promising: say so, and report it to be so. If it has a
problem, say it seems to have a problem. Only after extensive support,
testing, and cross-examination should an experiment or a device be classified
or labeled a fraud or a failure. Once labeled as such, they will not easily
obtain further support. Be responsible.
Free Energy Theoretical Considerations
Harold Aspden from the United Kingdom (1991) shared insights into the basic
factors involved with vacuum field or zero point energy so that: "the 'free
energy' challenge to win through and revolutionize the energy scene can
involve more people with design skills and resources." He proposes a frontal
attack on currently accepted physics, urging: "a theoretical and experimental
program to follow projects in five classifications: (1) Non-relativistic
energy theory; (2) Ferromagnetic vacuum energy generation; (3)
Electrodynamic vacuum energy generation; (4) Electromagnetic vacuum energy
generation; and (5) Gravitational vacuum energy generation." He also pointed
out the need for much of the work to be proprietary in order to attract
investment funds, but eventually the published literature would be augmented
by disclosure arising by development on these projects. Aspden (1992) this
year described a foundation of a new technology for converting environmental
heat energy into electricity. The structure involved, whether in the tested
thermoelectric device or the suggested radiation concentration device, uses
thin film metal films separated by non-conductive materials. An efficiency of
70% of the Carnot maximum has been demonstrated for the thermoelectric device
operating at ambient temperatures with a 20 degree temperature differential.
Moray B. King (1992) presents a very good detailed review of the "Progress and
Results in Zero-Point Energy Research" in his paper with the same title,
available from Tesla Inc. Moray states:
"Since the advent of quantum mechanics, modern physics has supported the view
that the fabric of totality of empty space is not void but contains a plenum
of energy called the zero point energy (ZPE). The energy consists of
fluctuations of electric field energy that persists even at zero degrees
Kelvin. A question applicable to engineers is can the ZPE be tapped as an
energy source? At first this idea seems to be a blatant violation of
conservation of energy, but if the zero-point energy really exists as is
suggested by modern physics, energy is present and its conversion would not be
the issue."
"The surprising cold current effect has been associated with other inventions,
such as T. Henry Moray's, using number 30 wire within his 50 kiloWatt device.
It might be explained by the hypothesis that the coupling of synchronous ion
oscillations with the ZPE can manifest macroscopic vacuum polarization
displacement currents, which can surround a conductive wire and be guided by
it. Conduction band electrons, lacking stable, radially convergent vacuum
polarization lines, have a minimal interaction with these displacement
currents, and the wires remain cold. If engineers could replicate this
effect, zero-point energy research would receive widespread interest."
"Another area where coherent ion motion is associated with energy anomalies
involves abrupt electrical discharges. (This is apparent in controlled water
explosion experiments.) Hyde's device was faced with a similar problem of
absorbing large voltage pulses in his patented invention. He solved the
problem and created an advanced embodiment which produced over 20 kiloWatts of
net output power while free running."
"From the concentrated vacuum polarization of atomic nuclei arises the
possibility of triggering a macroscopic ZPE coherence with the synchronous
motion of many nuclei. Further supporting evidence arises from inventions
that utilize coherent ion motions and output excessive energy. The sharp
voltage spikes that arise from ion-acoustic activity can be converted by use
of circuits such as Hyde's voltage divider. The largest effects might be
produced by solid state methods that manifest dual, counter-rotating,
acoustical, lattice spinor waves. If synchronous ion-acoustic activity
coheres the zero-point energy, there will be many more inventions forthcoming,
and a new energy source will be recognized."
It should be pointed out that the voltage divider circuit in Hyde's patent
(patent Fig. 6) has been questioned by several engineers. Moray King is
assisting a network of scientists and engineers who are redesigning this
circuit to replicate and produce a working model of this device.
For some years, Tom Bearden (1991) has worked on an extended electromagnetics
theory, involving the scalar component of the quaternion. (A scalar is a
number with no vector direction, like speed. A vector has numerical values in
each defined direction, like velocity. A quaternion is like a 4-component
vector in a real-complex plane space). In MAXWELL'S ORIGINAL QUATERNION
THEORY, this scalar component often remains when the directional components
zero. Further, it enfolds vectors and functions of vectors inside, in a
hidden variable manner. Specifically, Tom has patterned a unified field
theory concept upon the previously unnoticed but remarkable early work of E.
T. Whittaker. "In 1903 and 1904, Whittaker showed that all present day vector
EM can be replaced by scalar potential interferometry, and that bidirectional
harmonic EM plane wave sets could be used to produce a standing wave of force-
field-free potential. In modern terms, this shows how to turn EM wave energy
into electrogravitional potential energy, then how to interfere two such
scalar potentials to recover the EM energy, even at a distance. This
unrecognized work is of great importance: when applied to modern physics, it
produces supersets of quantum mechanics, classical electromagnetics, and
general relativity. Further, all three extended disciplines unify on their
common Whittaker subset, in a testable and engineerable fashion." All of
Tom's theories to unify electromagnetics, general relativity, and quantum
mechanics are summarized in his 1991 paper, which is only six pages long!
These are all available from the Association of Distinguished American
Scientists.
Bearden (1992) this year points out that: "By utilizing fundamental new
definitions for energy, potential, and scalar potential, the mass of the
atomic nucleus may be considered a powerful electrostatic scalar potential,
referred to as the mass potential. The Whittaker EM biwave structure of the
scalar potential then becomes a new and universal internal EM structure for
mass, including the atomic nucleus. This structure can be directly
manipulated electromagnetically, which allows direct EM alternation of the
mass potential, and the nucleus itself. This totally new class of nuclear
interactions is briefly explored, and several hypothesized mechanisms advanced
for neutralizing or processing nuclear wastes. Additional applications are
hypothesized for experimental falsification or verification. We have
previously pointed out two successful experiments by Sweet, one for extracting
useful EM energy from the vacuum, and one for the production of unilateral
forces, including antigravity. We have also pointed out the implications of
the approach for possible testable unification of electromagnetics, general
relativity, and quantum mechanics. The cited Whittaker theory establishes a
greatly expanded but engineerable EM, with external (spatial) and internal
(hyperspatial) subsets. Scientists and engineers are urged to seriously study
the two cited Whittaker papers and their implications, and to set up
experiments to falsify or verify the hypotheses advanced."
A new paradigm and a theoretical analysis supporting experimental tests of the
N-Machine was given by Shiuji Inomata from Japan (1991). He points out that
H. A. Lorentz's treatment, in which a stationary ether is assumed, gives the
correct answer. Even in this case, a new paradigm of science is necessary for
the full understanding of the functioning N-Machine.
Kurt Van Voorhies (1991) is conducting his graduate work at a well known state
university in the prospects of world-wide wireless power transfer, as first
proposed by Tesla. Tesla had designed and was building the Wardenclyffe tower
on Long Island in 1900, featuring a 187 foot wooden tower designed to support
a 68 foot diameter copper hemisphere. While Tesla intended to use the
facility publicly for communications, his secret aim was to implement wireless
power transmission. The transmitter was to have operated at 30-100 megaVolts,
which Tesla claimed was sufficient for worldwide power distribution. However,
when Marconi demonstrated transoceanic wireless communications with much
simpler equipment (illegally using Tesla's patents in the process), J. P.
Morgan withdrew funding for Tesla's project. Research indicates that the
power receiver requires the most development to demonstrate Tesla's early
theories.
Toby Grotz (1991) also presented theory and results of Project Tesla to
determine if the Earth's electrostatic (atmospheric) Schumann Cavity can be
resonated, if the power that is delivered to the cavity propagates with very
low losses, and if power can be extracted at other locations within the
cavity. The theory, bases of operation of a transmitter, related computer
programs, and component values are all given in Toby's paper.
A theoretical analysis of Tesla's "Death Ray" was also presented by Toby Grotz
(1991). By carefully examining historical records, this 1937 design was
probably the first attempt to construct a high voltage particle beam device.
Tesla's estimates indicate that a 5 meter diameter metal sphere charged to 60
million volts could project a high energy charged particle beam up to 60
kilometers through the air in a given direction.
Oliver Nichelson (1991) summarized two of Tesla's later energy generation
device designs, including a turbine-shaped Unipolar Dynamo design for a
machine that can continue to produce electricity after being disconnected from
an outside power source. This paper is also important because it also
describes Tesla's "Coil for Electro-Magnetics," patented in 1893. This coil
looks exactly the same as would the counter-wound conical coils of Walter
Russell, if Russell's coils were drawn on a piece of paper in two dimensions.
(Surprise.)
Don Kelly (1991) examined the theory and operation of an enhanced tank circuit
from two dated Soviet papers translated from the Russian. The experiments
suggest that the full band of a tank circuit can be utilized to take advantage
of a full EMF output over an extended period of time, and then periodically
and uniformly re-exciting the circuit as an effective electrical energy
conservation method. Don suggests that over-unity operation may be possible
by proper adjustment of the resonant driver frequency and time-varying
component reactances.
Paul LaViolette (1991) suggested taking a more lenient interpretation of the
First Law of Thermodynamics and allowing the possibility that free energy
devices could operate at efficiencies exceeding 100%. He evaluates several
ways of generating free energy in the context of subquantum kinetics gene
energy (photon blueshifting), zero-point fluctuations, Ampere law forces, and
electrogravitic gravity field manipulations.
Lynn Surgalla (1991) presented a tutorial on non-linear resonance phenomena
which describes the mathematical theoretical techniques she feels necessary
for modeling the design, tuning, and control of nonlinear effects.
Jose Zoleta from the Philippines (1991) proposed his TAF-13 device: Triac
Alternator Flywheel Motor, as an alternate source of energy. By carefully
choosing the components and resonant frequency of operation, he expects to
produce 150% or more energy than input into his motor-generator system.
However, I feel that more details and data on his design are necessary to
expect his system to provide over-unity operation.
In discussing plans for the quad-disc electrostatic generator, Donald Kelly
(1992), described the basic principles of the Wimshurst twin counterrotating
electrostatic (E/S) disks, and in addition a twin rotor-to-stator E/S
generating factor is included in this composite generator. The positive and
negative stator discs on each side of the rotor disc receive E/S transfer from
the multiple conductive segments on the outer side of each rotor. The voltage
and current amplification functions would be accomplished by twin, large
capacitive transformers, similar to those used in the Swiss M-L converter,
discussed in the next section below.
An improved method of winding inductors, transformers, and motors was
publicized by Toby Grotz (1992). This invention greatly enhances the ability
to generate magnetic fields with a given amount of wire. This invention may
be as fundamental to the use of magnetic fields as was Nikola Tesla's use of
rotating magnetic fields for the generation of alternating current.
George Hathaway in Canada (1991, 1992) has suggested the engineering
requirements necessary to begin to investigate and demonstrate zero point
energy. He draws together the most practical theoretical aspects of this
work, and explains how they are already at a sufficiently advanced stage to
allow initial experiments to be designed. He states that the extraction of
energy from such sources is really not an ivory tower pipe dream, but more a
matter of nuts and bolts. Thus, his suggestions should serve as a sound basis
for those engineers and researchers to keep a close watch on vacuum energy
physics.
The Integrity Institute is interested in providing the new measurement devices
and instrumentation that will be needed to conduct meaningful experiments in
these new advanced energy machine areas. Tom Valone (1991) presented an
overview of the interests of the Institute, and the various technical areas
they have supported and hope to support in the future.
Finally, in the important related area of theoretical financing, Professor
Charles Berg (1991) pointed out the relationship between available investment
capital in the current conventional energy resource and conservation areas,
and possible funding in these new innovative technologies. He points out
that: "an innovative concept, as initially applied, usually results in only a
small rise in productivity. However, immediately afterward, there follows a
wave of rapid improvement in the implementation of the new concept. This wave
is responsible for almost all the improvements in productivity that the
innovation brings to society. Still; without the introduction of the
innovative concept, there would be nothing upon which to improve." To me, his
message to investors is: plan on very little return in the short term, and
through licensing and networking agreements, reap a harvest that benefits all
the World in the near term and thereafter.
Reports on Experiments and Working Devices
John and Kevin Moray (1956, 1991) were kind to allow publication of a portion
of their book The Sea of Energy: the history of T. Henry Moray and his
devices, who from the early 1900s to the 1930s demonstrated to the US press's
satisfaction massive over-unity energy conversion.
"In 1901, T. Henry Moray theorized that energy was coming from within the
earth. Through continuous experimentation and in spite of the doubts held by
the scientific community of the day, he discovered that the energy was not
coming from the ground but from an outside source away from the earth. The
energy came in continuous surges, like waves of the sea, more in the daytime
than at night. At this time Moray had enough power to light a 16-candle power
carbon lamp at about one-half capacity. He labeled and defined his "Radiant
Energy: The source of energy coming from the cosmos to the earth and
radiating back from whence it came."
"Upon completion of his first Radiant Energy Device, many tests and
experiments were conducted for the scientific and public communities.
Channeling the waves of energy was done by way of an antenna. When set up and
connected to the ground, priming and then tuning, the device would draw
electrical energy. Results of this experimentation proved that the power
generation had not originated from within the device. The device, through
channeling radiant energy, produced up to 50,000 Watts of power and worked for
long periods of time. For political reasons many people, organizations, and
agencies of the day opposed him strongly. Despite the deliberate destruction
of the R. E. Device, threats against his work and his family, and armed
attacks by unknown assailants, T. Henry Moray continued with his dream of
harnessing a usable energy that the world could benefit from, and the same
time save the earth from the many methods of energy retrieval which now scar
and pollute its land, air, and seas."
(As a side note, Moray's first germanium solid-state device (semiconductor)
was submitted to the U. S. Patent Office in 1927, and was rejected on the
basis that it would not work without a heated cathode.) (Boy. Am I glad
times have changed. Whew!) (That's a sick joke folks!) Wake Up!
A complete description of operational electrostatic motors is given in the
book by Oleg Jefimen-ko (1973). Some small electrostatic motors can be
operated using only Earth-field antennas.
Paul Brown (1992) describes recent developments in materials technology that
now make it possible to fabricate nonthermal thin-film isotopic energy
converters with a specific power of 24 kiloWatts/kilogram and 5 to 10 years
working life at 5 to 10 Watts. He states: "This creates applications never
before possible, such as placing the power supply directly on integrated
circuit chips. The efficiency of the converters is about 25%, which is two to
three times greater than the 6 to 8% capabilities of current thermoelectric
systems."
In a very impressive and I feel extremely important paper, Paul Brown (1991)
described his ability to place radioactive nuclear isotope material into a
resonant tank circuit and extract energy from the decaying nuclide. He
writes: "A phenomena known as the 'Beta Voltaic Effect' is used to directly
convert radioactive decay energy into electricity without going through a
thermal cycle. A great attraction of isotopic power sources is that
radioactive decay energy is several orders of magnitude greater than chemical
energy." Specifically Paul uses a strong beta-emitting nuclide, like Krypton-
85 or Strontium-90 as the radioactive material and places it directly into a
tunable LC tank circuit. He claims that results of 50% conversion
efficiencies have been demonstrated, and greater efficiencies are hoped for in
the future. I have heard that T. Henry Moray had used radioactive substances
in his device in the 1930s. I wonder if charged particles or charged ions
play an important role in these effects. Moray King (1992) thinks they do.
Recent research has been conducted by Toby Grotz, Tim Binder, and Ron Kovac
(1992) in order to verify Walter Russell's theories and experiments. They
write: "The experiments that Russell conducted in 1927, which were verified
by Westinghouse laboratories, have been repeated. Russell at that time
thought that he had found a novel way to change the ratio of hydrogen to
oxygen in a sealed quartz tube containing water vapor. Russell's data
indicated that, where there had only been water vapor consisting of hydrogen
and oxygen in the tube, the addition of inert gasses in the amount of 69% were
detected. The use of magnetic fields was shown to produce this effect. The
end result of the experiment was to demonstrate a cheap and efficient method
of hydrogen production for a hydrogen based fuel economy." Russell also
developed and tested counter-wound sets of coils, each in the shape of
overlapping cones. The device was based on the "power multiplication
principle" discussed in the many books that he had written. According to a
memo dated in 1961, the device worked: "because of the false concept of
gravity which assumes it to be force of attraction which pulls inward from
within instead of a cyclic force which controls the expansion of cold into
heat, and the expansion of heat into cold... Nature's first principle of
power production and the construction of matter is to produce heat from the
cold of space. The heat thus generated radiates back into cold to complete
the wave cycle which automatically repeats itself in this ageless universe of
infinite continuity." (This is very similar to the theories of Victor
Schauberger; Alexandersson, 1982). On September 10, 1961, Walter and (his
wife) Lao Russell reported to their contacts at NORAD, that the coils had
worked and that the President of the United States could announce to the world
that a "greater, safer power than atomic energy" could be provided for
industry and transportation. The Russell's were convinced that they had found
and demonstrated a new source of energy and a conversion process for what is
now known as the zero point energy.
Bill Muller has developed the Muller Motor/Generator and presented a very good
review of the theoretical principles in his 1991 referenced paper. His motors
utilize super powerful permanent magnets with amorphous metal parts that have
practically zero hysteresis losses! Utilizing their design, based upon an
odd-even magnetic pole design developed in 1852, they describe the creation of
a magnetic balance in the motor which eliminates the work required to remove
one pole from the other no matter how large or how strong the magnetic surface
would be. I liked how Bill talked about powerful permanent magnets: "It is
only because these super powerful magnets carry enormous ampere pressures
within themselves that they are now able to lift their own weight." This
supports my view that permanent magnets, including planets, are vast sources
of potential energy. The Muller's are very excited about the operational
characteristics of their motors and generators, and demonstrated one large
motor at the 26th IECEC in Boston, MA. Their paper includes a detailed
description of their circuits with voltage and current analyses. They have
obtained very high system efficiencies, and state that "Up to this point,
there is no reason to expect what is called over-unity either on the motor or
the generator." Bill has promised to continue his experiments and keep in
contact with interested parties.
The Reed (1991) Magnetic Motor is an electromechanical device that Troy Reed
says runs on magnetic power. The author has developed a small prototype and a
larger unit that have both undergone several demonstrations and testing
programs. He has also filed for a Patent with the Patent Office and the
Foreign PTO/EPO. In his design, eight permanent magnets are placed on each of
four disks. Two outer disks remain stationary while the two inner ones are
mounted on a common shaft and are allowed to turn freely. Videotapes and
other information are available.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/free-n2.asc
+840
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,840 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : FREE-N2.ASC | Online Date : 11/06/94 |
| Contributed by : Bill Beaty | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
This is the second of a two part file (FREE-N1 and FREE-N2).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The electrical dynamo patented by Barbara Hickox (1991) is an interesting
device. The design includes a central rotating non-conductive cylinder into
which small cylindrical permanent magnets are placed. The interesting part is
that the magnets are all positioned with one pole outward, and located on two
spiral lines down the surface of the rotating cylinder. Barbara claims that
when properly designed, single-wound coils in the proximity of these rotating
magnets will exhibit power transfers much higher than the power required to
turn the cylinder. Again, here is the idea of a spiral or cyclic texture
within the substance of existing energy fields.
It must be pointed out here that accurate measurements of high frequency power
can be difficult to make and results can be inferred that are very much in
error (Triner & Hansen, NASA, 1977). All measurements of input and output
voltages and currents must be very carefully performed.
The Bedini free energy generator (1991) was also discussed. Complete plans
are given for the construction of a free energy system. While not an over-
unity device, the battery recharging circuit does allow a battery to operate
for a much longer period of time than it normally would, thus giving the user
that much more energy for free. However, it was pointed out that certain
circuit components, such as the transistor numbers, may be in error in these
plans, and that a brand new battery must used. Refer to Moray King's 1992
paper for more details.
Gary Johnson (1992) reported that electrically induced explosions in water
exhibiting free energy are relatively easy to produce with a 2 micro-farad
capacitor charged to 10 kiloVolts. "Expanding steam does not seem to be the
main cause for the explosions. Similar explosions are obtained with
significantly different peak currents, which raises questions about the
longitudinal Ampere forces being the primary cause. It is therefore
conceivable that we are tapping a new energy source." (Of course, this
technique may not be the optimum one to extract this energy. But it could
lead us toward a better understanding of this source.)
Professor P. T. Pappas from Greece gave an informative review of the theory
and his experiments with the creation of energy in sparks and discharges.
Pappas points out that in Maxwell's theory, it is assumed that there is
continuity and the closeness of the path for the flow of every current. He
examines the Cardinal current force law of Ampere, and claims that energy
creation is considered as not binding, but as possible, according to this
Cardinal law as an alternative principle to the continuous creation hypothesis
of Astronomy. Various inherent arc oscillations are presented as direct
evidence of energy creation.
Wingate Lambertson (1991) discussed the WIN Process as a solid state method
for converting zero-point energy into electrical energy that has been
developed over the past 19 years. He places a semiconductor ceramic barrier
with a parallel capacitance between an oscillating tank circuit and a power
supply. He has included test results that indicate a power input of 84 Watt-
sec producing an output of 810 Watt-sec, for an over-unity ratio of 9.6.
Rhetta Jacobson (1991) summarized an evaluation of Tesla Bladeless pumps and
turbines. As these pumps use the fluid friction to operate, she finds that:
"no other pump or engine can match the longevity, economy, size, safety,
silence and vibration free performance of these devices."
While not specially related to energy conversion devices, Glen Rein (1991)
presented results of his research with cell culture bioassays and the effects
of time varying quantum potentials. I feel this work is extremely important.
A modified caduceus coil was used to test the hypothesis that bucking
(opposite) electromagnetic fields can cancel their vector fields and generate
a time varying quantum potential (the "A field," for those in the know).
These experiments prove the existence of the "A field" that Tom Bearden and
others refer to that has been excluded from the simplified EM equations
(thanks to the simplifications of Heavyside) taught in physics today. The
coil was shown to dramatically stimulate the growth of lymphocytes in culture
cells, both directly in proximity and indirectly through storing its
information in water. For those in the health fields: think very carefully
about what is being said here! Then contact Glen!
Bruce dePalma (1991) points out that the key to understanding and explaining
the baffling situation of anomalous excess electrical energy generation in
free energy machines lies in a re-interpretation of magnetism as not being a
property of the magnet, but of space itself. The Primordial Energy Field is
then also distorted as a consequence of the spatial reaction to the
centripetal force field existing within a ROTATING magnetized conductor.
Bruce says that a N- machine/Space Power Generator is an electrical machine
which has the capability of producing electrical energy with significantly
less mechanical power input than the presently employed induction machines.
In 1978, he constructed such a rotating device, the Sunburst machine. In
1985, tests were performed under the direction of a well-known Professor
Emeritus of Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. The test report
quotes: "Known for over 150 years, the Faraday homopolar generator has been
claimed to provide a basis for so-called free energy generation, in that under
certain conditions the extraction of electrical output energy is not reflected
as a corresponding mechanical load to the driving source. During 1985 I was
invited to test such a machine. While it did not perform as claimed,
repeatable data showed anomalous results that did not seem to conform to
traditional theory. ... DePalma may been right in that there is indeed a
situation here whereby energy is being obtained from a previously unknown and
unexplained source."
While my research estimates that N-machines usually report over-unity
conversion ratios of 1.00 to 1.20, Bruce reports design improvements that
could result in a machine with an output/input power ratio of 5:1. Many
fundamental questions in electromagnetics are reopened by the implications of
the experiment with a rotating magnetic conductor. For those interested in
delving more deeply into these questions, I recommend reading Bruce's paper,
and his paper reference's 14-18.
Tom Valone (1991) also presents theoretical and experimental data that he has
obtained with a Faraday disk, or homopolar generator. He obtained a measured
back torque of 0.17 N-m for a 25 Watt generator which is in agreement with his
theory. Tom is one of the few researchers who has been doing accurate
measurements on such devices within the US today. George Hathaway (1991,
1992) is also continuing to perform various experiments in Canada.
Richard (Scott) McKie (1991) has designed and tested a small model of a PODMOD
device: a Power On Demand MODule. The circuitry invokes Tesla's theories of
electron flow, resonance, and magnetism, combined with modern theories on high
frequency electronics and radio antennas to generate power directly, without
the inefficient conversion of energy from other sources. A US patent has been
filed and granted. Scott claims to be able to generate output power as much
as 4,000 times the input power. Prototypes have been built and tested,
including independent tests by accredited specialists. Plans are currently
underway to build full-scale commercial PODMOD units, to be housed in standard
40 foot shipping containers, each having a continuous base-load generating
capacity of 10 megaWatts.
Don Kelly (1991) presented a very good review of the Methernitha free energy
machine, also known as the Swiss M-L Converter, or the "Thesta-Distatica."
The spiritual and communal group of Methernitha is located in Switzerland, and
a videotape might be available from Don at the Space Energy Association that
summarizes their community and shows the device in operation. An English
transcription of that video is also available (Methernitha, 1989). The device
contains two counterrotating disks (about two feet in diameter) that are set
in motion by hand. They continue to spin thereafter, and the machine
generates usable power that lights or powers small tools. The device appears
to operate continuously and generates a continuous 3 to 4 kiloWatts power at
about 220 Volts and about 10 Amps DC. From an analysis of Wimshurst
electrostatic generators, this would require a power increase factor, or over-
unity factor of about 20. Groups of investigative scientists from Europe and
Japan have been allowed to examine the device in the 1980s, and have all
verified these claims without understanding the machines principles of
operation (Nieper, Hans A.,1981).
Methernitha is committed to not release details on their device, as they
believe that present mankind is not ready for such advanced energy technology.
Their point of view is adequately summarized in a quote from a typed letter
from Methernitha in 1988:
"To surprise present mankind with a free-energy device would literally mean to
pour oil into a world which is already set on fire in too many places and
domains of human life. What mankind needs is peace, peace of mind to start
with, to have a chance to find back to nature and god, and not more and
further technological support in his strife for pleasure, which would rather
drown him in an ocean of noise, over-action and pollution in general. If you
can not accept this point of view please discover a new 'free'-energy device
by yourself. The responsibility for its publication with all of its
consequences will then be yours only. May peace be with you. Methernitha
From the videotape (or the transcription published in 1989), Methernitha
states:
"This wondermachine is lurked from nature, nothing else. Nature is the
greatest source of power as well as knowledge which man has, and it still
conceals many secrets, which are only revealed to those, who approach and tie
in them with highest respect and responsibility." "In order to understand
nature and to perceive its voice, man is obliged to experience silence and
solitude, and it was there, where the knowledge about this technology was
obtained." "To the educated physicist many a thing of this machine may seem
impossible, maybe even crazy. Maybe he is also offended by the conceptions
used to explain the whole. Only partly we could use the concepts of
conventional physical terminology in order to explain and define only
approximately the functions and properties of the various parts of the
machine." "It has to be remembered that the established sciences were already
many times forced to change or give up some of their very fundamental
concepts. Think about Galileo Galilei, in order to name only one example.
Our human society almost condemned this man as a sorcerer and magician, just
because he investigated and discovered a truth which seemed unacceptable by
the established science of the days." "The book of knowledge is not wrong,
but it is incomplete, and therefore allows to draw wrong conclusions." "We
are part of a new era which brings to light many new facts and new knowledge.
The clothes of nowaday science have become too tight and should be stripped
off, just like the larva of an insect does with its skin. Only this will
allow a true metamorphosis to take its course, and finally, at the limits and
at the destination of all worldly knowledge, a universal and unlimited
spiritual science, radiating and beautiful, just as the completed imago of an
insect, may give its blessings and benediction to a renovated humanity."
Tom Bearden (1991) described a Vacuum Triode developed by Sweet. I have seen
Tom's videotape of this device in operation, when it was operating. Tom
considers the highly nonlinear nucleus of the atom as a pumped phase conjugate
mirror (PPCM). He likens this effect to a triode tube since the amplified
phase conjugate replica of the signal wave is much like the amplified output
of a triode, and the input to a PPCM is much like a triode's grid signal
input.
Sweet has developed working devices based upon this vacuum triode concept
utilizing paired barium ferrite magnets and resonant circuits. It should be
noted that in order for the device to work, the magnets were preconditioned by
an undisclosed process. Devices have been reported and demonstrated to
reliable witness that have produced continuous 6, 500, and 5,000 Watts output
from a nine volt DC battery. Through Tom's theoretical suggestions, the
circuit was modified to test possible antigravity effects. The test results
performed by Sweet alone indicated a 90% weight reduction of the device
itself, from 6 pounds to about 20 ounces on a spring scale, when the external
load was increased from 0 to 10 Watts. To my knowledge, no further tests have
been performed with this device, as Sweet has had severe heath and family
difficulties.
Devices Worthy of Future Study
It is difficult to separate which devices should be considered as more
important or better to research than the others listed in this paper. All
have potential merit and application. However; for a first step, what is
really needed is repeatable experimental evidence of a new potential source,
to produce the so-called zero point energy, free energy, or over-unity
effects. As funding is presently limited, the lack of resources limits our
research to simple and uncomplicated devices. I would recommend the following
devices, in order of increasing complexity and financial commitment, as worthy
of careful attention and rapid duplication:
Kelly's Soviet Resonant Circuit, A Computer Model and Analyses;
Bedini Free Energy Generator (Brand new motorcycle battery);
Hickox's Electric Dynamo (US Patent No. 4,249,096);
Kelly's Soviet Resonant Circuit;
Russell's Counter-wound Overlapping Conical Coil Designs;
dePalma's and Valone's Homopolar Polar N-Machine Generator;
Brown's Radioactive Decay Resonant Circuit (US Patent No. 4,835,433);
Hyde's Electrostatic Energy Field Power Generating System
(US Patent No. 4,897,592);
Sweet's Vacuum Triode;
McKie's PODMOD Generation Device; and
Methernitha's Swiss M-L Converter.
Summary
Of all of the devices reported herein, I know of none that have been
adequately tested and accepted to allow unconditional support of their claims,
nor have any of these devices been replicated or reproduced by another party
to confirm their operation. The devices that appear most promising appear to
be held as proprietary or secretive for financial, legal, or philosophical
reasons. This very frustrating situation is being actively overcome by the
creation of a dedicated and growing network of interested scientists and
engineers, that are providing accurate and honest information transfer,
pooling resources, and looking ahead to create, organize, and provide adequate
financial support that works.
Business Plan
What is needed is an international organization that is committed to the study
of these fields and the support of its researchers. Such an organization
cannot survive within the United States alone. What is proposed is a three
step plan: (1) The creation of an annual advanced energy conference to bring
together those who will openly discuss ideas, experiments, and devices; (2)
The creation of an international non-profit corporation that would support
these activities and extend and network these conferences internationally;
and (3) The creation of a financial dividend structure that would allow all
participants to gain from the success of others. Research and advancement
done at the expense of others must become a thing of the past.
Acknowledgments
I thank all of the researchers and authors that have promoted these ideas and
have placed themselves on the line in the face of so-called adversity. I also
thank the staff and promoters of the IANS for conducting this conference, and
I thank Tom Bearden for allowing me to take his place during this conference
in his absence. Finally, I thank myself and my higher guides for allowing me
to be able to continue to increase my consciousness, to learn to accept
knowledge without fear, and to accurately transmit that knowledge to others.
Appendix
INSIGHTS INTO THE PROPRIETARY SYNDROME
By KEN MacNEILL
Cadake Industries
Winter Haven, Florida
To give you some background on myself, I have been interested in the energy
situation since I can remember. I have built all kinds of devices, solar
energy panels, windmills, photovoltaic arrays, flywheel devices, and also
carburetors of which I will talk on Sunday. In my background I am an
accomplished tool and diemaker, moldmaker, been involved in Design Engineering
for the past 12 years, primarily in the automation area.
My first real involvement with other people in this alternate energy area was
at the Toronto Symposium in 1981 where I met George Hathaway as well as over
100 other people that believe in the impossible according to orthodox science.
Since that time I have made myself aware of just about everything that is
happening in this field, and believe me there are some really fantastic things
going on. The rediscovery of some of the technology that was lost in the past
is finally coming to realization, for instance the Tesla technology, the
Hubbard device, the Moray approach to tapping into the free energy supply that
we're sitting in without even knowing it.
A friend of mine gave me a real insight possibly without even knowing it. He
said the problem could only be solved by just considering the problem of
weighing a glass of water at 500 feet under water. Here you are under water
with a glass of water: how do you weigh it???
The analogy is the same for us. Here we sit in the vastness of the cosmos on
top of one of the biggest magnets known to us and we are like the glass of
water. We are in the vast ocean of energy. Look around us and watch just the
weather for instance, the next thunderstorm, think of all the electrical
potential being wasted. That energy is there; it is very real.
Tom Bearden, one of our upcoming speakers, may have illustrated it quite well
by the bird sitting on top of the wire with 13,000 volts going through it. We
all know that it could kill him but it doesn't. I am positive that within
this group will be the ways and means for making the energy situation of the
future change.
Now to the other side of this coin. Why has not this technology been allowed
to become established? We have to look at the 'profit motive' involved. If
we have free energy, how will they charge for it? What will happen to the
billions of dollars that the utilities and oil companies and the government
backing these establishments do if we can give the people independence from
the chains of having to pay for energy?
One question that has been uppermost in my mind for the last year has been the
rhetoric given by our elected representatives about the energy situation and
the amount of money given to small researchers who could possibly give us a
viable approach to becoming energy independent. Who gets the government
money?? Let me get a little audience participation in the question. How many
of you have all the money you need for research in the energy area? Everyone
who has please stand!!!!! Now let me mention a few of the names of the
companies that get the money. See if you recognize them: Exxon, Gulf Oil,
General Electric, Westinghouse, TRW, Exide Storage Battery, all manufacturers
or producers of fossil fuel products. We need to get away from the fossil
fuels for the future and get into something that can indeed give us a future
because we are rapidly depleting not only our natural resources but our air
and water. All because of burning fossil fuels. We fund our universities and
colleges in the most directed of ways. If you want to explore the
possibilities in some of the more esoteric areas, for instance the ones you
will be hearing about in the next three days, there is no money for that.
WHY??? Because of the possibility that we might succeed. What would our
government do if all the American people could go back and forth to work, heat
their homes, run their businesses without paying taxes on gas and oil?
Consider the fact that all of the gas stations would go out of business or
would have to find other ways of making money. Many complimentary businesses
would also fold. But alas, this is America. What are we here for??? To
perpetuate Big Business, Big Government, or to advance toward the future, not
expending all of our natural resources but to save them to make the goods of
the future. Coal and oil both can be used for making all kinds of things
besides fuels; the list is endless.
It is my feeling that the technology may be already here and may have been
shown to the government. It even may have been introduced to our patent
office and turned down. Because as you know, there is no such thing as a
perpetual motion device. And I agree with the premise because forever is a
long time.
But there are surely some of the devices or parts thereof that have been
introduced to the government or to big business in the past which have been
shelved. Tesla's transmission device is a classic illustration probably best
known to this group. What happened is that they removed the money from him to
do his research and effectively stifled this remarkable man. How many other
times has it happened to someone not so well known? At this moment, there are
over 3,000 devices or applications in the patent office that have been branded
as security or put under wraps by the secrecy order, Title 35, U.S. Code
(1952) Sections 181-188. What is security? How is it defined? I have had
many inventors or other scientists tell me that they did not want to discuss
their invention with me or others because they might lose it to us or we might
tell someone else before they got it onto the market. Believe me, it won't
get there by going through the patent process. It is my feeling that if such
a device were introduced at this level, then it would be put under the Secrecy
Act. I don't know that I am correct in this assumption. But I cannot imagine
a government like ours wanting to commit financial suicide. So what better
way than to brand something as a secret?
I would like to read the Secrecy Order to you so that you may better
understand my concern. Please pay close attention. I think it is very
important. To you or anyone!!! Consider your receiving this:
SECRECY ORDER
(Title 35, United States Code (1952), sections 181-188)
NOTICE: To the applicant above named, his heirs, and any and all of his
assignees, attorneys and agents, hereinafter designated principals:
You are hereby notified that your application as above identified has been
found to contain subject matter, the unauthorized disclosure of which might be
detrimental to the national security, and you are ordered in nowise to publish
or disclose the invention or any material information with respect thereto,
including hitherto unpublished details of the subject matter of said
application, in any way to any person not cognizant of the invention prior to
the date of the order, including any employee of the principals, but to keep
the same secret except by written consent first obtained of the Commissioner
of Patents, under the penalties of 35 U.S.C. (1952) 182, 186.
Any other application already filed or hereafter filed which contains any
significant part of the subject matter of the above identified application
falls within the scope of this order. If such other application does not
stand under a security order, it and the common subject matter should be
brought to the attention of the Security Group, Licensing and Review, Patent
Office.
If, prior to the issuance of the secrecy order, any significant part of the
subject matter has been revealed to any person, the principals shall promptly
inform such person of the secrecy order and the penalties for improper
disclosure. However, if such part of the subject matter was disclosed to any
person in a foreign country or foreign national in the U.S., the principals
shall not inform such person of the secrecy order, but instead shall promptly
furnish to the Commissioner of Patents the following information to the extent
not already furnished: date of disclosure; name and address of the
disclosee; identification of such part; and any authorization by a U.S.
government agency to export such part. If the subject matter is included in
any foreign patent application, or patent, this should be identified. The
principals shall comply with any related instructions of the Commissioner.
This order should not be construed in any way to mean that the Government has
adopted or contemplates adoption of the alleged invention disclosed in this
application; nor is it any indication of the value of such invention.
It is my feeling that something on the order of a so-called 'free energy
device' would receive this treatment. My only approach would be to go to the
public domain. That is, get the information or the device out there to enough
people that they could not stop you. This group looks like the best group to
give this information to. Hopefully it will forthcoming in the next three
days.
Transcribed from: PROCEEDINGS; The Second International Symposium on
Non-Conventional Energy Technology, pp 125-126.
I have been told this was presented on September 23, 1983.
Contact Ken MacNeill at Cadake Industries, P.O. Box 1866, Clayton, GA
30525.
References
Introduction
Cheney, Margaret (1981). Tesla: Man Out of Time, Prentice Hall
Publishing, NY.
Gurdjieff, G. I. (1963). Meetings With Remarkable Men, page 185, E. P.
Dutton, NY.
Johnson, Gary L. (1992). "Searchers for a New Energy Source," IEEE
Power Engineering Review, pages 20-23, January 1992.
King, Llewellen (1991). "On Solving the Great Problems of the World,"
26th IECEC Luncheon Speech, Boston, MA, August 8, 1991.
Walters, Helen B. (1961). Nikola Tesla - Giant of Electricity, Thomas
Y. Crowell Comp., NY.
Politics
Anagnoston, Taki N., MD. (1991). Surviving the AIDS Plague, America
West Publishers.
Bird, Christopher (1991). The Persecution and Trial of Gaston Naessens,
H. J. Kramer, CA.
Brown, Tom (1988). The Hindershot Motor Mystery, Borderland Sciences.
Center for Action, Book and Videotape List and Newsletter, PO Box 472,
HCR 31, Sandy Valley, NV 89019, (702) 723-5266 or (800) 729-4131,
Newsletter $24/yr.
Coleman, Dr. John (1992). Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the
Committee of 300, America West Publishers.
Douglass, M. D., William C., "The Cutting Edge Newsletter," PO Box 888,
Clayton, GA 30525, (706) 782-7222.
Findley, Paul (1985). They Dare to Speak Out, Lawrence Hill Books, IL.
Hatonn (dharma) (1990). Rape of the Constitution (Vols. 1 & 2), America
West Publishers.
Hatonn (dharma) (1990). Skeletons in the Closet, America West
Publishers.
Lynes, Barry (1989). The Cancer Cure That Worked! Fifty Years of
Suppression, ITS Books.
Lynes, Barry (1989). The Healing of Cancer: The Cures, the Coverups,
and the Solution Now!, ITS Books.
MacNeill, Ken (1983). "Insights into the Proprietary Syndrome," 2nd
International Symposium on Non-Conventional Energy Technology,
Atlanta, GA, pages 125-126.
Project Censored Newsletter, PO Box 310, Cotati, CA 94931, $30/yr.
Resines, Jorge (1988). The Complex Secret of T. Henry Moray, ITS Books.
Sananda, Hatonn, Ashtar, Nikola Tesla, & Walter Russell (dharma) (1989).
AIDS - The Last Great Plague, Tehachapi Distributing, Inc., CA.
Strecker, Dr. Robert B. (1988). "The Strecker Memorandum," Videotape
(On AIDS), The Strecker Group, 1501 Colorado Blvd., Eagle Rock, CA
90041, (213) 344-8039.
Religion
Bashar (Anka, Darryl) (1990). Blueprint For Change, New Solutions
Publishing , CA.
Cameron, Pam and Fred (1991). Bridges of Light, Access Centers, PO Box
67420, Scotts Valley, CA 95067, $14.
Connecting Link Mag., 9392 Whitneyville Rd., Alto, MI 49302-9694, (616)
891-0410, $20/yr.
Cosmic Awareness, Revelations of Awareness Newsletter, PO Box 115-K,
Olympia, WA 98507.
Delaforge, Gaetan (1987). The Templar Tradition in the Age of Aquarius,
Threshold Books, VT.
Festinger, Leon, Henry W. Riecken, and Stanley Schachter (1956). When
Prophecy Fails, Harper Torchbooks, Harper and Row Publishers, NY.
Fortune, Dion (1957). Psychic Self-Defense, The Aquarian Press,
England.
Hatonn (dharma) (1991). Pleiades Connection - Return of the Phoenix,
Volume 1, Tehachapi Distributing, Inc., CA.
Hatonn and St. Germain (dharma) (1991). Phone Home E. T. - Reach Out
and Touch Someone - Like God, America West Publishers.
Hurtak, J. J. (1978). The Book of Knowledge: The Keys of Enoch, Acad.
for Future Sciences.
Kut-Hu-Mi, El Morya, Hilarion, Saint Germain, Hatonn, Soltec, Korton,
Ashtar, Sananda, et. al. (Tuieta) (1992). Conclave: 4th Meeting,
Portals of Light, IN.
Lazaris (Pursel, Jack) (1987). The Sacred Journey - You and Your Higher
Self, NPN Pub., FL.
Mary (Kirkwood, Annie) (1991). Mary's Message to the World, Blue
Dolphin Publishing, CA.
Monroe, Robert A. (1971). Journeys Out of the Body, Doubleday &
Company, Inc., NY.
Monroe, Robert A. (1985). Far Journeys, Doubleday & Company, Inc., NY.
The Pleiadians (Marciniak, Barbara) (1992). Bringers of the Dawn, Bear
& Company Pub., NM.
Ra (Rueckert, Carla) (1984). The RA Material, Whitford Press, PA.
Ramtha (Knight, J. Z.) (1986). Ramtha, Sovereignty, Inc., WA.
Rashid, Isa, and Edward Meier, English translation by J. H. Ziegler and
B. L. Greene (1992). The Talmud of Jmmanuel, Wild Flower
Press,P.O. Box 230893, Tigard, OR 97224.
Sananda (dharma) (1989). And They Called His Name Immanuel, I Am
Sananda, America West Publishers.
Seth (Roberts, Jane) (1986). Dreams, Evolution, and Value Fulfillment,
Prentice Hall Press, NY.
Thoth (Melchizedek, Drunvalo) (1992). "Flower of Life Meditation and
Workshop," Set of Six Videotapes, San Jose Book Store, 1231
Kentwood Av., San Jose, CA 95129, (408) 446-0590.
Sex
Hatonn (dharma) (1991). God Said: Let There Be Light - and Creation
Became, Pleiades Connection - Volume 2, Tehachapi Distributing,
Inc. CA.
Hatonn and St. Germain (dharma) (1991). Science of the Cosmos -
Transformation of Man, Pleiades Connection, Volume 3, Tehachapi
Distributing, Inc. CA.
Russell, Walter (1926). The Universal One, U. of Science and
Philosophy.
Russell, Walter (1947). The Secret of Light, U. of Science and
Philosophy.
Russell, Walter (1989). A New Concept of the Universe, U. of Science
and Philosophy.
Russell, Walter and Lao (1981). Atomic Suicide, U. of Science and
Philosophy.
UFOs and Crop Circles
Andrews, Colin, and Pat Delgado (1989). Circular Evidence, Phanes
Press, MI.
Andrews, Colin (1991). "Undeniable Evidence," Videotape, Ark Soundwaves
of Glastonbury, PO Box 1395 - BA6 9FE, Glastonbury, England, about
$35.00.
Bartholomew, Alick (Ed.) (1991). Crop Circles - Harbingers of World
Change, Gateway Books, The Great Tradition, CA.
Carr, Otis T., "Otis T. Carr and OTC Enterprises Information File," PEA
Research.
Elders, Brit and Lee, and Lt. Col. Wendelle Stevens (1979). UFO -
Contact from the Pleiades, Volume 1, Genesis III Publishing, AZ.
Elders, Brit and Lee, and Lt. Col. Wendelle Stevens (1983). UFO -
Contact from the Pleiades, Volume 2, Genesis III Publishing, AZ.
Friedman, Stanton T. (1991). "Free Book List," 79 Pembroke Crescent,
Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 2V1, Canada.
Hynek, Dr. J. Allen and Philip J. Imbrogno (1987). Night Siege - The
Hudson Valley UFO Sightings, Ballantine Books, NY.
Kinder, Gary (1987). Light Years, The Atlantic Monthly Press, NY.
Lazar, Robert (1992). The Lazar Tape (Videotape), Tri-Dot Productions,
1324 S. Eastern, Las Vegas, NV, 89104, $33.45.
Leslie, Desmond, and George Adamski (1953). Flying Saucers Have Landed,
The British Book Center, NY.
Lindemann, Michael (Ed.) (1991). UFOs and the Alien Presence: Six
Viewpoints, The 2020 Group, CA.
Noyes, Ralph (1990). The Crop Circle Enigma, Gateway Books, The Great
Traditions, CA.
Sananda (dharma) (1989). Space-Gate, America West Publishers.
Stevens, Wendelle, and August Roberts (1985). UFO Photographs Around
the World Vols. 1 and 2, America West Publishers.
UFO Books, PO Box 1053, 714 First Street, Florence, AZ 85232.
UFO Video Clearinghouse, PO Box 342, Yucaipa, CA 92399-0342, (714) 795-
3361.
Walters, Ed and Francis (1990). The Gulf Breeze Sightings, William
Morrow and Co., Inc., NY.
Patents
Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Box 9, Washington DC 20231.
Patent Information Clearinghouse, 1500 Partridge Avenue, Building 7,
Sunnyvale, CA 94087, (408) 730-7290, FAX (408) 735-8762.
Brown, Paul (1989). "Apparatus for Direct Conversion of Radioactive
Decay Energy to Electrical Energy," US Patent No. 4,835,433.
Carr, Otis (1959). "Amusement Device," (i.e. A Flying Saucer), US
Patent No. 2,912,244.
Nikola Tesla Museum (1956). Nikola Tesla Lectures, Patents, and
Articles, Health Res., CA.
Hickox, Barbara, (1981). "Electric Dynamo," US Patent No. 4,249,096.
Hyde, William (1990). "Electrostatic Energy Field Power Generating
System," US Patent No. 4,897,592.
Johnson, Howard (1979). "Permanent Magnetic Motor," US Patent No.
4,151,431.
McKie, Richard L. (1992). "A Power Supply Comprising Two Tank
Circuits," US Patent No. 5,146,395.
Merritt, Thomas, and Mario Pasichinskyj (1985). "Linear Reciprocating
Electrical Generator," US Patent No. 4,500,827.
Pasichinskyj, Mario (1990). "Magnetic Motion Electrical Generator," US
Patent No. 4,904,926.
Richardson, Frank B. (1978). "Electromagnetic Converter with Stationary
Variable-Reluctance Members," US Patent No. 4,077,001.
Shoulders, Kenneth (1991). "Energy Conversion Using High Charge
Density," US Patent No. 5,018,180 (in the last pages).
Tesla, Nikola (1891) "Electro-Magnetic Motor," US Patent No. 464,666.
Trombly, Adam (1982). "Closed Path Homopolar Machine," International
Patent (PCT) H02K 31/00, 39/00.
Books and Reports
Alexandersson, Olof (1982). Living Water, Gateway Books, The Great
Tradition, CA.
Aspden, Harold A. (1989). "The Theory of the Gravitation Constant,"
Physical Essays, Vol. 2, No. 2, pages 173-179.
Aspden, Harold A. (1991). "The Theory of Antigravity," Physical Essays,
Vol. 4, no. 1, pages 13-19.
Bearden, Thomas E. (1989). Gravitobiology: A New Biophysics, Tesla
Book Company.
Bearden, Thomas E. (1992). "Background for Pursuing Scalar
Electrodynamics," Association of Distinguished American Scientists.
Bearden, Thomas E. (1988). "Maxwell's Original Quaternion Theory Was a
Unified Field Theory of Electromagnetics and Gravitation,"
Proceedings of the International Tesla Society, 1988, ITS Books..
Bearden, Thomas E. (1988). AIDS: Biological Warfare, Tesla Book
Company.
Bearden, Thomas E. (1986). FER-DE-LANCE: A Briefing on Soviet Scalar
E-M Weapons, Tesla Book Company.
Bearden, Thomas E. (1986). Analysis of Scalar Electromagnetics, Tesla
Book Company.
Cathie, Bruce L. (1990). The Energy Grid - Harmonic 695: The Pulse of
the Universe, America West Publishers.
Childress, David H. (1992). Anti-Gravity and the World Grid, ITS Books.
Childress, Hatcher (1985). The Anti-Gravity Handbook, Adventures
Unlimited Press, IL.
DeMeo, James (1989). The Orgone Accumulator Handbook: Construction
Plans, Experimental Use, and Protection Against Toxic Energy, ITS
Books.
Heinlein, Robert (1961). Stranger in a Strange Land, Ace/Putnam Books,
NY.
Hoagland, Richard C. (1987). The Monuments of Mars, North Atlantic
Books, CA.
Hooper, W. J. (1974). New Horizons in Electric, Magnetic and
Gravitational Field Theory, Electrodynamic Gravity, Inc.
King, Moray B. (1989). Mapping the Zero-Point Energy, ITS Books.
Krafft, C. F. (1955). The Ether and its Vortices, ITS Books.
Meyer, Stanley A. (1990). The Birth of New Technology: Water Fuel Cell
Technical Brief, Water Fuel Cell International Headquarters, 3792
Broadway, Grove City, OH 43123.
Moray, John and Kevin (1956). The Sea of Energy in Which the Earth
Floats, Cosray Res. Inst.
Nieper, Hans A. (1981). Revolution in Technology, Medicine, and
Society, pages 359-362, (available via Tachyon Energy Research, CA,
(213) 286-2940).
Sigma, Rho (1977). Ether-Technology, A Rational Approach to Gravity
Control, ITS Books.
Conferences
IECEC, 26th Proceedings (1991) (Boston, MA). American Nuclear Society,
555 North Kensington Avenue, La Grange Park, IL 60525,
(708) 352-6611.
IECEC, 27th Proceedings (1992) (San Diego, CA). Society of Automotive
Engineers, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001
(412) 776-4841.
International Tesla Symposium Proceedings (1984, 1986, 1988, 1990,
1992). International Tesla Society, PO Box 5636, Security,
CO 80931.
Societies and Publications
Academy for Future Science, PO Box FE, Los Altos, CA 95031.
America West Publishers, PO Box 2208, Carson City, NV 87702,
(800) 729-4131.
Association of Distinguished American Scientists, PO Box 1472,
Huntsville, AL 35807.
Borderland Sciences Research Foundation, PO Box 429, Garberville, CA
95440-0429.
Cosray Research Institute, 2502 South 4th East Street, Salt Lake City,
UT 84115.
Electric Spacecraft Journal, PO Box 18387, Ashville, NC 28814,
(704) 252-8083, $24/yr.
Electrodynamic Gravity, Inc., Akron, OH 44310.
Gravity Power Research Association, 36 Mountain Road, Burlington, MA
01803.
Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin, 4030 Braker Lane W., Suite
300, Austin, TX 78759.
International Tesla Society, 330-A West Unitah Street, Suite 215,
Colorado Springs, CO 80905-1095, $20/yr.
ITS (International Tesla Society) Books, High Energy Enterprises, PO Box
5636, Security, CO 80931, (719) 475-0582.
The Mars Mission, Society for the Study of Native Arts and Sciences,
2800 Woolsey Street, Berkeley, CA 94705.
PEA Research, 9638 Soaring Oaks Drive, Elk Grove, CA 95758.
Quantum Biology Research Laboratory, Cotati Research Institute, PO Box
60653, Palo Alto, CA 94306.
Space Energy Association, PO Box 11422, Clearwater, FL 34616, $35/yr.
Tesla Book Company, PO Box 121873, Chula Vista, CA 91912,
(619) 437-8515.
Tesla Incorporated, 820 Bridger Circle, Craig, CO 81625.
Tesla Incorporated Computer BBS (719) 486-2775 (300/1200/2400, 8, N, 1).
Tehachapi Distributors, PO Box 1911, Suite 122, Tehachapi, CA, 93581,
(800) 800-5565.
University of Science and Philosophy, Swannanoa, PO Box 520, Waynesboro,
VA 22980, (703) 942-5161, (800) 882-5683.
Free Energy Theoretical Considerations
Aspden, Harold (1991). "The Principles Underlying Regenerative Free
Energy Technology," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 336-340.
Aspden, Harold (1992). "The Electronic Heat Engine," 27th IECEC, pages
4.357-4.363.
Bearden, Thomas E., and Walter Rosenthal (1991). "On A Testable
Unification Of Electromagnetics, General Relativity, And Quantum
Mechanics," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 487-492, and Association of
Distinguished American Scientists.
Bearden, Thomas (1992). "A Redefinition of the Energy Ansatz, Leading
to a Fundamentally New Class of Nuclear Interactions," 27th IECEC,
pages 4.303-4.310, and Association of Distinguished American
Scientists.
Berg, Charles A. (1991). "Innovation And Energy Use," 26th IECEC, Vol.
4, pages 382-387.
Grotz, Toby (1991). "Development Of A Particle Beam Weapon Based On
Nikola Tesla's Design Of 1937," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 410-415.
Grotz, Toby (1991). "Wireless Transmission Of Power, An Attempt To
Verify Nikola Tesla's 1899 Colorado Springs Experiments, Results Of
Research and Experimentation," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 404-409.
Grotz, Toby (1992). "The Use of Mirror Image Symmetry in Coil Winding,
Applications and Advantages in Magnetic Field Generation," 27th
IECEC, pages 4.311-4.313.
Hathaway, George D. (1991). "From Anti-Gravity to Zero-Point Energy: A
Technical Review of Advanced Propulsion Concepts,"
AIDAA/AIAA/DGLR/JSASS 22nd International Electric Propulsion
Conference, Viareggio, Italy.
Hathaway, George D. (1991). "Zero-Point Energy: A New Prime Mover?
Engineering Requirements For Energy Production & Propulsion From
Vacuum Fluctuations," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 376-381.
Inomata, Shiuji (1991). "New Paradigm And N-Machine," 26th IECEC, Vol.
4, pages 331-335.
Kelly, Donald A. (1991). "The Enhanced Tank Circuit As A Free Energy
Module," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 424-428.
Kelly, Donald A. (1992). "An Enhanced Quad-Disc Electrostatic
Generator," 27th IECEC, pages 4.351-4.356.
King, Moray (1991). "Tapping The Zero-Point Energy As An Energy
Source," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 364-369.
King, Moray B. (1992). "Progress and Results in Zero-Point Energy
Research," 27th IECEC, pages 4.297-4.302.
LaViolette, Paul A. (1991). "Subquantum Kinetics: Exploring The Crack
In The First Law," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 352-357.
Nichelson, Oliver (1991). "Nikola Tesla's Later Energy Generation
Designs," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 433-438.
Surgalla, Lynn A. (1991). "Nonlinear Dynamics: Mathematical Physics
For 21st Century Technology (A Tutorial For Engineers),"
26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 394-399.
Valone, Thomas (1991). "Non-Conventional Energy And Propulsion
Methods," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 439-444.
VanVoorhies, Kurt, and James Smith (1991). "The Promises And Prospects
of Worldwide Wireless Power Transfer: An Overview," 26th IECEC,
Vol. 4, pages 341-346.
Zoleta, Jose C. (1991). "Triac Alternator Flywheel Motor (TAF-13): An
Alternative Source Of Energy," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 358-363.
Reports on Experiments and Working Devices
Bearden Thomas E., and Floyd Sweet (1991). "Utilizing Scalar
Electromagnetics To Tap Vacuum Energy," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages
370-375, and Association of Distinguished American Scientists.
Bedini, John C. (1991). "The Bedini Free Energy Generator," 26th IECEC,
Vol. 4, pp 451-456.
Brown, Paul M. (1991). "Current Status And Future Research With
Resonant Nuclear Generators," 26th IECEC, Vol. 6, pages 132-134.
Brown, Paul M. (1992). "Solid State Isotopic Power Source for Computer
Chips," 27th IECEC, pages 4.345-4.350.
Grotz, Toby, Tim Binder, and Ron Kovac (1992). "Novel Means of Hydrogen
Production Using Dual Polarity Control and Walter Russell's
Experiments with Zero Point Energy," 27th IECEC, pages 4.339-4.344.
Hickox, Barbara (1991). "An Electrical Dynamo That Is A New Technology
Over The Generation Of Electricity By Induction," 26th IECEC,
Vol. 4, pages 457-460.
Jacobson, Rhetta (1991). "The Tesla Bladeless Pumps And Turbines," 26th
IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 445-450.
Jefimenko, Oleg D. (1973). Electrostatic Motors, Their History, Types,
and Principles of Operation, ITS Books.
Johnson, Gary (1992). "Electrically Induced Explosions in Water," 27th
IECEC, pp 4.335-4.338.
Kelly, Donald A. and Patrick G. Bailey (1991). "The Methernitha Free
Energy Machine, The Swiss M-L Converter," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages
467-472.
Lambertson, Wingate A. (1991). "History And Status Of The WIN Process,"
26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 461-466.
McKie, Richard L. (1991). "PODMOD - Power Generation For A Brave New
World Order," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 479-483.
Methernitha (1989). "Informationsfilm Thesta-Distatica: Sound Track
Transcription," Tagungsband Proceedings, Internationaler Kongress
fur Freie Energie, Einsiedeln, Switzerland 1989,
ISBN 3-9520025-1-8.
Moray, John E., and Kevin R. Moray (1991). "The Sea Of Energy: A Means
For The Preservation Of The Environment By Drawing Kinetic Energy
From Space," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 347-351.
Muller, William J. F. (1991). "Muller Motor / Generator Principles,"
26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 388-393B.
dePalma, Bruce (1991). "Magnetism As A Distortion Of A Pre-Existent
Primordial Energy Field And The Possibility Of Extraction Of
Electrical Energy Directly From Space," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4,
pages 429-432.
Pappas, P. T. (1991). "Energy Creation In Electrical Sparks And
Discharges: Theory And Direct Experimental Evidence," 26th IECEC,
Vol. 4, pages 416-423.
Reed, Troy G. (1991). "The Reed Magnetic Motor: The Motor Of
Tomorrow," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 484-486.
Rein, Glen (1991). "Utilization Of A Cell Culture Bioassay For
Measuring Quantum Potentials Generated From A Modified Caduceus
Coil," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 400-403.
Triner, James E,. and Irving G. Hansen (1977). "Electric Vehicle Power
Train Instrumentation - Some Constraints and Considerations,"
ERDA/NASA 1011/77/1 report NASA TM X-73629.
Valone, Thomas (1991). "The One-Piece Faraday Generator: Research
Results," 26th IECEC, Vol. 4, pages 473-478.
See also:
"A Critical Review of the Available Informatrion Regarding Claims of
Zero-Point Energy, Free-Energy, and Over-Unity Experiments and Devices",
a paper by Patrick Bailey, posted to UFO-L net, October 8, 1993.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/freedef.asc
+132
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
November 7, 1992
FREEDEF.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Toby Grotz.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TESLA BBS 300,1200,2400 8,N,1
719-486-2775 DATA
303-824-6834
Zero Point Energy is known as an energy that fills the fabric of all
space. Technically the ZPE results from an electric flux that flows
orthogonally to our perceived dimension or reality. The mass
equivalence of this energy has been calculated by physicists to be
on the order of 1093gms/cm3.
Henry T. Moray, Walter Russell, and Nikola Tesla described the
nature of the ZPE and designed and built equipment to engineer its
properties. It may be possible to build devices to cohere this
energy. This would result in a nonpolluting, unlimited supply of
virtually free energy.
Vortex Mechanics are related to the mechanism in which ZPE results
in the manifestation of matter in this dimension. These
interactions are also modeled in the physical universe in the
actions of plant growth, the formation of mollusk shells, and
tornados. Vortices form matter, shape it and hold it together,
guiding life's process by centripetally charging and feeding growth,
then, centrifugally discharging it and throwing it back to its
original essence.
N-Machines are electromechanical devices related to homopolar
generators. Because there are experiments that can be done with
these machines that bring up possible discrepancies between
relativity theory and quantum mechanics, they are of interest to the
alternative energy researcher. There are inventors and researchers
who have constructed these devices and have reported anomalous
energy output including over unity operation.
Gravitational Effects have been reported by a number of researchers
working in the fields of high voltage electrostatics and dynamics,
magnetics design, and in the operation of over unity devices. The
field of electrogravitics offers opportunity in advanced energy
propulsion systems as well as the potential for aiding in the design
of over unity devices.
Magnetic Motors are mechanical devices which use the energy
potentials stored within magnets to produce rotation without
external input. Over the past fifty years a number of designs have
been patented. There are several motors of this type in development
which show promise for use in power generation.
Transmutation Of Elements has been reported by many investigators
since the turn of the century. These researchers used the
electromagnetic principles of vortex mechanics to effect changes in
matter that are not explained by conventional theory.
Cold Fusion is an excess energy phenomenon whose explanation lies
outside the realm of conventional physics. Because the cold fusion
experiments were conducted and reported by chemists, the physics
community who was normally associated with fusion research, took a
dim view on the reports of those who appeared to be interlopers into
a restricted territory. Cold Fusion has also led to the phenomenon
of the politicization of science. Cold Fusion research has been
labeled as "bad research" by the U.S. Department of Energy which
supports the multibillion dollar efforts of physicist who are
attempting to produce fusion through other means.
Scalar Wave Theory involves the mathematics that is used in modeling
vortex mechanics, zero point energy, transmutation, and the design
of over unity devices. It is based on the little know area of
mathematics known as quaternion theory.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/freedom1.asc
+330
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet!
December 3, 1991
FREEDOM1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The following file is one that is "in creation" and is dependent
your feedback, thoughts, ideas and comments.
The purpose is the creation of an article that will show WHAT COULD
BE based on current, near future and far future technologies.
It should paint a picture of what life COULD BE LIKE were we to get
off our butts and do something constructive, not just sharing of
information, but also experiments, verification of claims and
working devices.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FREEDOM TECHNOLOGY
from a message on KeelyNet
Hi John! You must be reading my mind.....I was going to do a
version and place it online for review by others who would no
doubt have insights that I would miss, then when we get everyones
various ideas, make it into a very interesting file....you know,
What to expect from all this mess?
...something kind of on that order. In fact, here are the notes
I wrote up last night as a kind of guideline based on the stuff
that is here NOW or very close...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1) Free Energy - Hyde - Sweet - Testatika - Heat Pump (DennisLee)
Newman - Hydrogen Generators - ??
2) Anti-Grav - Kidd - Keely - MHD - Brown - Searle - Carr - ??
3) Disease Eradication - Rife - Ozone/UV - Essiac - Naessens -
Koch - MWO - HCL therapies - ???
4) Age Reversal/Suspension - Dotto - Cell Food - D20 - Oil of
Antimony - Chelating agents
5) Limb/Organ Regeneration - Cloning - Burr's Electrodynamics
6) Waste Disposal/Conversion - Morse - Steiner/Schauberger
Spirals - Laser Disintegration - Solar Concentrator
Disintegration
7) Food Production - Hydroponics - Fish Farming - Steiner BD -
Greenhouse Bubbles
8) Water Precipitator - either natural condensation or forced
with use of outside power
9) Advanced Learning - Autosuggestion - Subliminals - Sleep
Learning Mind Enhancement Drugs - Electronic Stimulation
10) Energy/Matter Converters - Parr - Hilarion - Dweller - Russell
11) Communications - Motional Fields - Scalars - Aether Modulation
12) Teleportation - ??
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Conversion of current vehicle/transport technology in a slow process
and based on ideas as shown in Back to the Future. In the movie,
there were cars that converted from ground to flying vehicles.
These took advantage of modified vehicles AS WE CURRENTLY USE for
ground transportation alone. The idea of skylanes which vectored
into towns, roads or cities was quite inspired.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry would phase in with construction of these various machines
with the need for replacement parts, repair/maintenance of operating
units, possibly built-in obsolescence of 5-30 years, power units for
home Central, automobile, aircraft, watercraft, spacecraft and
portable sources.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Future society would be based on expansion of human knowledge and
arts through fact finding projects, exploration, colonization, trade
and commerce (exchange of services, goods or credits).
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Individuals, groups, small businesses and larger companies would
build products or offer services for small markets PRIMARILY on a
community based level as in the age old free market concept and
these must comply with basic quality standards.
Sales of these products, crafts, services, etc. would be through in
LOCAL markets or through state, national, or world commerce
channels. Communities would become SELF-SUPPLYING with "imports" of
higher technology goods from communities that chose to focus on the
manufacture of such goods.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
One problem that is a major obstacle is how to overcome vested
interests especially in convincing them that all this can be PHASED
IN successfully with the absolute MINIMUM of DISRUPTION to the
economy or current technologies. These groups, companies,
governments or individuals MUST change to accomodate the new
technologies and freedoms that would NECESSARILY come from the
gradual implementation of free energy, anti-grav, etc.
Why should we try to get such companies or vested interests to work
WITH this rather than AGAINST us? Because they are so entrenched in
the minds of people as well as almost absolute rulers of the economy
and legal system.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
What options do we have beyond dependency on the open armed welcome
of vested interests who have managed to suppress such expansion for
so many decades?
Positives
1) We have computer networks
2) We have access to photocopiers
3) We have newsletters
4) We have meetings
5) We have multiple level marketing
6) We have our own set of contacts (each of us)
7) We have friends, relatives and acquaintances
8) We have open mindedness to new concepts and ideas
9) We understand the concept of shareware and that the majority
of people would be more than happy to contribute to plans or
machines THAT WORK in a practical sense
Negatives
1) People get greedy
2) People get selfish and seek power or control of a process or
technology
3) Why should people or companies change the status quo for some
half-baked idea or machine that would REMOVE THE VICTIMS from
centralized sources (that can be metered and thus the user
can be charged)?
4) We don't have funding for our plans, machines or research to
develop those machines
5) Inventors/researchers many times get involved with investment
groups who legally tie up a machine or technology
6) Inventors/researchers fear that their discovery will be taken
away from them without appreciation or compensation, why
should they share their work for free or without GUARANTEE OF
JUST COMPENSATION?
7) Inventors frequently die before sharing or recording
sufficient information that others may carry on the work
--------------------------------------------------------------------
So HOW would this phasing in WITH THE CURRENT SYSTEMS take place?
- taxes must continue to support government projects especially
funding of technology or product invention and manufacture,
this includes basic R & D along with manufacturing and
marketing.
And for this we are talking SMALL GROUPS OR COMPANIES as
getting THE LION'S SHARE of the funding as their ideas are more
radical and thus far-reaching and closer to achievement than
the overloaded and self-impeding teams at bigger companies.
Precision, speed, willingness to try are the hallmark of small
companies that are radically successful.
This funding for companies MUST also include folks who AREN'T
REQUIRED TO HAVE A PHD or other "accredited" certification.
Willingness to learn and the optimism of future thinkers...that
is a PIVOTAL POINT in all this type of research...
- automobiles and trucks must be "weaned" away FROM the
consumption of gasoline TO the use of HYDROGEN, through
conversions of current vehicles to hydrogen generators that
would be available from garages as a bring it in, we do the
conversion, you pay us and go.
This conversion could also come in KITS for those who wish to
install it themselves. Government subsidies would be granted
to those desiring this conversion of OLDER vehicles.
NEW VEHICLES would have this ON DEMAND hydrogen generators
BUILT-IN DIRECTLY and people would again be ENCOURAGED to get
away from the older vehicles (even the conversions) and go to
the new which have ENGINES DESIGNED TO WORK OPTIMALLY with the
hydrogen as the combustible fuel.
- Thermopile/thermocouples could also be attached to the hydrogen
generators to capture and convert most of the heat into useable
power
- for homes, there is the DennisLee heat pump system which can be
GREATLY EXPANDED to provide local HOT/COLD AIR for the home
environment, HOT/COLD WATER for home use and very probably
electricity
- also for the home, there is a superior heat pump generator
which I have seen in action that will operate on temperature
differentials of as little as 3 degrees F...this would provide
motive force for LOCAL POWER GENERATION
- Atmospheric Water Precipitators that use condensation
"membranes" to precipitate water DIRECTLY from circulating air
and which collects in tanks to be drawn out as needed...thus
water can be used as is or further filtered...this minimizes
"used" water that is fluoridated/chlorinated or otherwise
contaminated from natural water
- Health - where a morning shower/shave entails standing on a
metal plate which uses HYBRID TECHNOLOGIES including RIFE
frequencies, MWO frequencies, UV/OZONE to bombard the body with
signals designed to destroy bacteria/viruses as well as enhance
the immune system by stimulation
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Industries based ON THE ABOVE would provide ample opportunities for
forward looking current companies to PHASE in the newest FREEDOM
TECHNOLOGIES and yet still make money since these devices have to be
built, tested, marketed and maintained.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The problem is how to get it going in a BIG WAY from the "git go" to
prevent all the interferences generated as legal altercations or
other suppressive influences by vested interests including
governments, large companies that rely on METERED SERVICES as well
as individuals or groups who make large sums of money daily from
people who have never been allowed the FREEDOM of energy
independence.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I feel that networks and multiple level and/or mail order will all
play a significant part in bringing this about....but the FIRST
PRIORITY must be the development or duplication of WORKING DEVICES.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
When people become aware that working systems ARE AVAILABLE and can
either be bought in KIT form, purchased as OUTRIGHT WORKING UNITS or
can BE INSTALLED BY "authorized" servicemen...the world will be OURS
in that we will have achieved a MAJOR STEP in the right direction.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
That is close to the One World Order idea because with the
achievement of practical levitation, borders will begin to dissolve.
With cooperation among nations and the general raising of the
standard of living of all countries, we cannot HELP but to evolve to
a more GESTALT (group mind) approach to problems and solution
sharing as evinced in Star Trek with the "Federation".
--------------------------------------------------------------------
With the advent of practical space travel, COLONIZATION will be then
come into its own as one of the greatest stimuli to the one world
concept that could ever be, ESPECIALLY knowing that one can take a
portable power plant that uses ZPE (zero point energy), hydrogen or
other sources, include a maintenance kit or spare parts, your own
way to levitate and the universe is your oyster....
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the beginning of a paper to show what IS, what COULD BE in
the immediate future (should everyone FREELY SHARE their working
plans) and the FAR FUTURE. The main focus HOWEVER should be
EXISTING devices that can be combined in HYBRID ARRANGEMENTS to
achieve practical results as in our bulletin #3....
--------------------------------------------------------------------
So, take this information as a skeleton, think about it in light of
what you know or suspect. Then you can either upload your ideas for
inclusion into an article (credit given unless you do not wish it)
for the BBS and possibly for Borderland or whoever...TO SHOW PEOPLE
THAT IT *IS* POSSIBLE TO USE THIS STUFF, however, it involves time
and investment using proven workable techniques.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
What part can you play in making such concepts a REALITY?
If you are an inventor or researcher,
SHARE YOUR IDEAS or PLANS with others, making sure that your
papers give you credit for your work. In Shareware, the author
asks that should a user find it worthy of use, that a small
contribution be sent to the inventor/author.
This SHAREWARE concept relies on the basic honesty of most
people although there are folks who will take and or USE the
technology without any feeling of ripping off someone else's
work. Those people will live to regret the circle that they
created and will eventually harvest. They should be encouraged
to YIELD to their higher influences.
Try to prevent getting tied up with investors who will
eventually get greedy and seek for the highest payback. At
least get a good lawyer and contract. In that process, your
work COULD be tied up AND NEVER COME TO PRACTICAL USE!
Share your work with AMPLE NOTICE THAT YOU DID IT AND EXPECT
SOMETHING IN RETURN IF IT IS USED.
If you are a company or investor,
Seek out inventors and researchers of radical technologies, ask
for a working demonstration (with non-disclosures EXPECTED) and
don't worry about the NOT INVENTED HERE mentality.
Once the machine is proven to work and under normal NON-
LABORATORY conditions, work up kits through separate sources.
Construct the machine in separate stages or at a central
location. USE NETWORKS and mailing lists to GET THE PRODUCT OUT
to as many people as possible BEFORE suppressive influences come
into play. Once a great majority of people are USING THESE
MACHINES, the opening MUST GROW to allow open sales.
ALWAYS REMEMBER THE INVENTOR! He did not necessarily do all the
work out of love, but expects compensation so that he can GO ON
TO IMPROVE HIS INVENTIONS OR DISCOVER OTHER PRODUCTS.
If you as a business, treat the inventors well, they will BRING
YOU THEIR NEXT INVENTION. Be first, be poised to strike a
receptive market, get the lion's share of the first orders
BEFORE others jump on the bandwagon, then go to the NEXT
PRODUCT.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
GESTALT IN ACTION with ADAPTIVE RESPONSES should be our way of life
instead of just some high sounding verbiage...thanks......>>> Jerry
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/freemag1.asc
+198
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
October 21, 1992
FREEMAG1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Cal Newman.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FREE ENERGY FROM MAGNETISM
Most people believe that it is impossible to build a motor run
solely by magnets. But try to tell that to people like Howard
Johnson who spent six years fighting the patent office to accept the
reality of his magnet motor. They finally granted him U.S. Patent
4,151,431. And there are dozens of other magnet motor patents.
Engineers at Hitachi Magnetics Corporation have come right and told
us that a motor run by magnets is feasible and logical, but the
politics of the matter make it impossible for them to pursue
developing a magnet motor or any device that would compete with the
energy cartels. The obstacles to free energy are the big banks who
own the energy industries.
Many achievements in developing free energy from magnetism have
occurred in obscure basement workshops all over the country. Many
of these achievements have remained the secret of the inventor, who
being afraid of reprisal from the establishment did not share this
technology.
The following information comes from Hitachi and other researchers:
"The magnet that lifts a pound today, if the loan (on it)
is gradually increased day-by-day, will lift double the
amount in time. Whence comes this energy? Keely teaches
that it comes from sympathetic association with one of the
triune currents of the polar stream, and that its energy
increases as long as sympathetic flows last, which is
through eternity."
from the book "Keely and His Discoveries"
by Clara B. Moore, 1983
In developing a theoretical basis for self-powered magnetic motors,
it will be necessary to examine some of the elementary observations
of magnets.
1. Two permanent magnets can either attract or repel depending
on the arrangement of the magnetic poles.
Page 1
2. Two magnets repel further than they attract because of
friction and inertia.
3. Most of our energy comes directly or indirectly from the
electromagnetic energy of the sun, e.g., photosynthesis and
water cycles of ocean to water vapor to rain/snow to ocean.
4. Magnetic energy "travels" between the poles at the speed of
light. (Some researchers claim it is faster.)
5. Permanent magnets and ferrous metals are attractive only.
Attraction is an inverse square force.
6. Two permanent magnets on both sides of an iron shield are
attracted to the shield and only weakly to each other at
close proximity to the shield.
7. Magnetic energy can be shielded, e.g., by placing a piece
of iron between the magnet and the object it is attracting.
8. The sliding or perpendicular force of a keeper (e.g., the
shield) is much less than the force in the direction of the
field to remove the keeper.
9. Most of the magnetic energy is concentrated at the poles of
the magnet. You can prove this by sprinkling iron filings
around a magnet and seeing where the greatest
concentrations of filings fall. This will give you a
"picture" of the magnetic field.
10. A permanent magnet loses little strength unless dropped or
heated. Heating, etc., misaligns the magnetic elements
(domains) within a magnet.
11. If a weight lifted by a permanent magnet is slowly
increased, the lifting (or pulling) power of the magnet will
be increased up to the point where all the magnetic domains
in the magnet are aligned in the same direction.
12. Using magnets for repelling tend to weaken them as it causes
misalignment of the magnetic domains.
13. A magnetic material between two magnets will always be
attracted to the stronger magnet.
By using some of the above magnetic principles in a mechanical
arrangement, it is possible to "convert" the magnetic energy stored
in permanent magnets into useable mechanical energy without the use
of electrical energy, i.e., direct conversion of magnetism to
mechanical energy.
According to modern magnetic theory a magnet motor would soon run
down as the energy stored in the magnetic field would be used up
driving the flywheel arrangement. However, the only way a magnet is
"used up" is if it gets demagnetized by dropping, heating, or
another magnetic field, or using an AC electrical demagnetizer.
If the magnetic field of a magnet is actually part of the magnetic
field of the earth, then there can be no depletion.
Page 2
Magnetic energy is not created. It is either stored in the permanent
magnet or in the surrounding space. It can not be used up or
destroyed.
Many magnetic materials are available. Knowledge and careful
analysis is needed to make the right choice.
Only when there is a change in the balance of internal energies is
energy released or absorbed by the permanent magnet.
In addition to design parameters, physical characteristics and
environment must be carefully considered in the application of
permanent magnets.
In development of properties, in design analysis, and in quality
control of a particular permanent magnet, component-measurements are
vital.
Changing the state of magnetization is an important factor in
working with todays high coercive force permanent magnet materials.
It could be that the Hubbard Generating System has already made
magnet motors obsolete. Whatever the case, it is obvious that free
energy will be developed by individual effort since it is
painstakingly clear that neither big business or big government will
act in the best interests of the citizenry.
***********************************************************
The above obtained from:
Rex Research
P.O. Box 19250
Jean, NV 89019
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/freenrg1.asc
+1056
View File
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/freenrg2.asc
+1122
View File
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/freenrg4.asc
+264
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
April 2, 1993
FREENRG4.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Alain Bealieu.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL COMMENT FROM BEARDEN (pertaining to the release of his
paper "The Final Secret for Free Energy", listed on KeelyNet as
FREENRG3.ZIP) :
The present classical CEM model prescribes closed, energy-
conservative type systems. If any electrical device works totally
according to the accepted CEM model, it cannot and will not ever
produce overunity. Simply put, you have excluded any hidden EM
source that is freely replenished, and you have assumed continual
killing of all energy input sources utilized. On the other hand, if
one takes the view that the overunity electrical machines are
possible after all, then __ whether one is consciously aware of it
or not __ one has implied that classical CEM must somehow be
substantially flawed. If it's flawed, then __ being a model __ some
of its primary assumptions (postulates) and/or fundamental
definitions must be in error.
The proper place to go after "free electrical energy" is to
rigorously examine CEM, over and over, until flaws are uncovered
which allow a hidden, freely replenished source of input energy. In
other words, one must find a way to "open" the electrical system to
an in flow of energy from this source, without closing off the
source.
Until one finds such an "extension" of CEM, one has no model or
concept which can reasonably be expected to provide overunity
electrical energy output. Note also that, while the majority of the
EM circuitry of an electrical overunity machine may obey CEM, at
least one section __ where the source is freely tapped and the
excess energy extracted __ must violate CEM.
I have spent many arduous years in this very process, right or
wrong. The bottom line of my search is this: the only verified (by
Whittaker and Ziolkowski) (WZ) "freely replenished river" of EM
energy, that can act as the required "free energy" source for input
to the would-be overunity electrical system, is the potential. But
to understand the potential, completely new definitions are required
for many entities, among them being energy, electrical charge,
electrostatic scalar potential, voltage, etc. The present so-called
"definitions" of these entities in CEM are either non-existent,
entirely wrong, or quite unsatisfactory.
Page 1
So far, the search has uncovered two major ways to tap the
continually-replenished EM energy in the scalar EM potential:
(1) use of the inner WZ internal biwave structure of the potential
as pump waves on/to a nonlinear material (such as the atomic
nucleus), so that the nucleus becomes a pumped phase conjugate
mirror. Then, by normal phase conjugate optical theory, simply
inputting a small signal wave will produce an amplified phase
conjugate replica (PCR) wave emitted from the mirror material,
and this PCR will precisely backtrack the original input signal
wave's path (see the distortion correction theorem) back out of
the nucleus, out of the atom, and into the external circuit.
There, the amplified PCR wave can be "filtered off" and sent to
the external load, to power the load. The Floyd Sweet vacuum
triode works precisely by this mechanism. Note particularly
that Barrett has shown that higher topology EM (such as the
original quaternion EM theory) can accomplish such "optical
functioning" without the use of optical materials.
To do Sweet's vacuum triode type process is thus theoretically
possible with electrical circuitry alone, but one must have
more than the current understanding of CEM, as Barrett pointed
out. In other words, one can "open" any 4-space system by
adding hyperspace (or subspace, if one insists on retaining
Minkowski 4-space). One can thus have a hyperspatial source.
Indeed, Ziolkowski and others have already pointed out that the
WZ type decomposition of the scalar potential is essentially
equivalent to having complex sources.
(2) The second way is to "trap the electron gas electrons" in a
separate collector, feed "current-free potential" to the
collector from a primary battery or other source of potential,
and collect a bunch of excess energy (potential) in the
collector's "penned up free electron 'horses'" waiting to carry
the excess energy to the load and dissipate it there, once they
have been released.
Then, one switches the primary potential source away from the
collector, while the "energy-loaded horses" are still trapped
and straining at the bit, so that no work can be done __ by
those agitated horses when they stampede out of there __ on the
internal resistance of the primary source, to destroy or reduce
it.
In the same switching action, the collector with its "snorting
but still trapped electron horses" is switched across the load
to form a totally separate circuit with it, having nothing at
all to do with the original primary source of potential. Then,
the agitated horses are released, and thunder out through the
load, scattering their riders (excess energy) in all directions
in the load, producing work/heat and powering the load. They
will also charge on around to the reverse side of the
collector, and kill its charge separation (kill its potential)
as well, just as does any ordinary circuit.
The major disadvantage of method 1, as we presently have seen
it done (however, check Barrett's demonstration that Tesla's
patented circuitry is capable of doing it by circuitry alone),
Page 2
is that time-reversed electrical energy is produced. So Method
1 has some serious drawbacks. "Time-reversed energy stuff",
which should stay in the atomic nucleus as Newtonian 3rd law
reactions and 3rd-law energy exchanges, is dragged out.
Unusual effects on biological systems can occur. Antigravity
effects can occur. Other hidden processes in the universes,
that affect the atomic nucleus, can be gated into the external
circuitry, causing disaster. Monopoles can be deposited in the
magnets, causing them to explode like hand grenades. Most of
the new "massive time-reverse energy" phenomenology is still
unknown.
One cannot at this stage of ignorance adequately guarantee
human safety. I presently don't see just how this kind of
energy can pass an Underwriter Laboratories' testing and
certification, until a lot more exhaustive work is done to
understand the new phenomenology.
Method 2, however, yields ordinary, garden-variety, positive-time
electrical energy. The method presented in the paper is my own
discovery. No unusual time-reversed phenomena are involved. It would
appear to be eminently practical to produce and certify power units
based on Method 2. The phenomenology and risks are the same as for
ordinary, time-forward power systems.
Method 2 has another unique characteristic: as a system, all the
subsystems are already in the literature and validated. They have
just not previously been put together in this fashion. So
development of the system really represents an "integration" problem
only, after one first does a little development of a proper
degenerate semiconductor material (DSM).
In other words, one first develops (and tests) the exact doping
materials and percentage, to get a DSM material that is still a good
conductor but has a relaxation time of __ say __ one tenth of a
millisecond. One builds the wires from the battery to the collector
out of this new DSM material. If one uses a capacitor for the
collector, the plates must be made out of the new DSM material, not
out of normal "pure conductor" material.
Then one develops a switcher that switches in one tenth (or less)
the relaxation time of the DSM, or in this case in one hundredth of
a millisecond. That switching time, of course, is easy for any
decent electronic technician or electronic engineer.
One also develops a timing circuit that will
(1) sense the status of the discharge of the collector energy
through the load, and
(2) trigger the switching at the correct times so that a smooth
two-cycle (collect, discharge) process results. Note that
the lengths of cycle one and cycle two are not necessarily
equal at all. One may use multiple collectors/loads
simultaneously, cascaded collectors/loads, etc. Hundreds of
variations are possible and feasible.
It is not possible to do anything with this discovery in a normal
manner. I would dearly like to be economically independent, so I
Page 3
could work full time in my efforts on free energy, antigravity,
extended EM healing, cancer, etc. Many orthodox scientists will also
fiercely resist this upstart notion of "overunity" electrical
machines to the bitter end. When powerful economic interests realize
one has such things for real, one is certainly going to be stopped,
jailed, or killed, or he may just "mysteriously vanish" and never be
seen again.
So I just freely released and distributed my discovery of method 2,
in the paper "The Final Secret of Free Energy". It is deliberately
targeted toward technicians, junior engineers, and educated laymen.
(The principles and definitions raised, however, can be debated to
the nth degree by knowledgeable foundation scientists). The paper
has already been distributed worldwide. Now the principles and
definitions are available to everyone. If they are in error, shortly
that will be proven in spades. If they are correct, that will also
be established shortly.
Anyone who wishes can develop and patent a particular application.
There's no longer any way to stop this information from being
disseminated and utilized. I hope that a flurry of development and
patenting activity will result around the world. Get cheap, clean
electrical energy to everyone. Bring on the electric auto, clean up
the noxious auto exhausts, get rid of giant oil spills, and clean up
the biosphere.
Tom Bearden, March 12, 1993
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/freepol.asc
+1254
View File
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
bbs/KEELYNET/ENERGY/frenette.asc
+110
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
______________________________________________________________________________
| File Name : FRENETTE.ASC | Online Date : 06/21/95 |
| Contributed by : Kenny Morrow | Dir Category : ENERGY |
| From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 |
| A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences |
| KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 |
| Voice/FAX : (214) 324-8741 InterNet - keelynet@ix.netcom.com |
| WWW Mirror - http://www.eskimo.com/~billb |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The following excellent article describes what is today referred to as
Hydrosonic heating systems. A fellow named Griggs is selling a similar system
as 100% efficient though they apparently are overunity, which he will not
claim in his advertising. This is a major research subject because it defies
the 2nd 'law' of thermodynamics and is of great interest to many people.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"FUELESS FURNACE" USES FRICTION TO HEAT AVERAGE SIZE HOME FOR "50 CENTS A DAY"
Taken from:
FARM SHOW MAGAZINE
8500- 210 TH ST.
JOHNSON BLDG. LAKEVILLE, MN.
VOL. 2 # 5 1978
(Picture available from the article)
Eugene Frenette pours hydraulic oil into his prototype "fuelless furnace".
The oil, combined with the spinning action of two cylinders, supposedly
creates friction which in turn, produces the heat.
"Defies a basic Law of physics -- a complete hoax," say skeptics. Prototype
shown below has been used to provide supplemental heat in Fernette's 12-room
house.
How about this --- a fuelless furnace that uses friction instead of fuel to
heat an average size home "for only $15 to $16 a month". What's more, it
reportedly will sell for less than half the cost of a conventional oil or gas
furnace. Sound too good to be true?
"You bet" say some observers, who claim the whole thing's a hoax - that it
defies a basic law of physics. But others, including a host of small
manufacturers and distributors, have jumped at the chance to get in on the
ground floor of a "breakthrough" development they feel can help solve the
energy crisis. They have invested in franchises and hope to be taking orders
for Eugene Frenette's fuelless furnace early next year.
It all started during the winter of 1977-78. It was costing Frenette, father
of 12 children - 10 of whom are still at home - a whopping $230 a month to buy
fuel oil to heat his huge, old uninsulated 12 room "Pillsbury mansion" in
Londonderry, New Hampshire. He launched a crash program to perfect his
invention - a simple but unorthodox 'fuelless' furnace which he maintains will
be able to heat an average size home for only 50 cents a day and which he
feels can be retailed "for $600 to $800."
Frenette installed his prototype friction heater in a 10-year-old washing
machine. It's made up of two cylinders spinning in opposite directions.
There is a clearance of 1/8 in. between the two cylinders which are lubricated
by a quart of light motor oil. Spinning action of the cylinders and resulting
friction produces the heat, according to Frenette.
He claims franchised models will be odorless. They don't require any chimney
since no fuel is burned and there is no flame, soot or odor and are as quiet
as a refrigerator. All models will plug into a regular 110 volt outlet and
will occupy no more space than a washing machine or dryer.
Estimated operating cost to heat an average size, well insulated home with a
200,000 btu friction "centric" heater is right at $15 a month (for electricity
to operate the motor).
One of the first successful prototypes was built in August by Max Johnston,
owner of Johnston's Metal Specialties in Creston, Iowa. "I'll admit I was
skeptical at first. Sounded like a hoax to me," says Max who was hired by the
owner of the "Frenette Furnace" franchises for Alaska and Kentucky to build a
prototype.
Following basic design specs supplied by Frenette, Johnston built a prototype
which, in his words, "made a believer out of a lot of skeptics around here.
including me." It cost about $800 to build, including about 40 hours of labor.
Now that we've built one, we could build another in a lot less time. We
estimated its output at between 100,000 and 150,000 btu's.
The friction stove produced no odor, made no more noise than you would get
with a furnace motor, and we had no vibration or other problems with the
rotating circular drums which create the friction heat." Max told FARM SHOW.
According to Larry Nickerson, Frenette's son-in-law, all franchises except
Washington. D.C. and Hawaii, have been sold. Some individuals bought up 3 or 4
states. Cost of a state franchise, based on population, was $2,500 cash, plus
an additional down payment payable on availability of the first approved
stoves, and a remaining balance spread out over 20 years.
The Iowa franchise for example, was priced at $145,000. Of that, $2,500 was
payable immediately to hold the franchise, with $36,250 payable upon
availability of Frenette-approved stoves for sale. The balance ($108,720),
plus interest is payable over 20 years in monthly installments.
"I bought two states and others from this area bought up many of the other
states franchises during the short time they were available." Harold Schweiss,
of Sherburn, Minn., told FARM SHOW. Schweiss has hired a firm to produce a
working model which was completed and ready for testing just as this issue
went to press.
"Frenette came up with the idea but doesn't have manufacturing or marketing
expertise," explains Schweiss. "Individual franchise holders are taking the
patented ides to local manufacturers to get a working model. These models,
subject to Frenette's approval will then be produced and sold when they've met
the usual battery of tests.
Eventually, the best features of these prototypes will be combined into
production models which will be essentially the same but produced by a number
of different manufacturers," Schweiss explains.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More