265 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
265 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|
|
|
October 26, 1991
|
|
|
|
CASGRAV1.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This EXCELLENT file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of
|
|
Darrell Moffitt.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
A Derivation of Newton's Constant via Casimir Potentials
|
|
and Quantum Fluctuation Effects in Vacuum
|
|
|
|
Darrell Moffitt
|
|
|
|
In recent times, numerous authors have explored the possibility that
|
|
zero-point energy (z.p.e.), the observable consequence of quantum
|
|
fluctuations in vacuum, may in some manner give rise to the
|
|
phenomena called gravity. (1-4)
|
|
|
|
Various arguments have been invoked, some suggesting that symmetry
|
|
breaking effects similar to those observed in the Standard Model
|
|
play a dominant role. (1-3)
|
|
|
|
Other authors suggest that the feebleness of gravitational coupling
|
|
reflects a natural cut-off in the frequency of electromagnetic waves
|
|
composing the vacuum. (4) These arguments, while useful, fail to
|
|
generate a straightforward derivation of Newton's constant. Be that
|
|
as it may, there are mechanisms which produce close approximations.
|
|
|
|
Two of these approximations derive from arguments based on Casimir
|
|
potentials. (5) Both approximations make use of Casimir's polar-
|
|
polar potential,
|
|
|
|
((h/2ãc^5)(w^6/6)(P1*P2)(1/R)),
|
|
|
|
describing the interaction between two polarizable systems.
|
|
|
|
The frequency cut-off is determined naturally by the dimensions of
|
|
the systems, w=(c/r); the volume polarizations (P1, P2) are
|
|
determined similarly. The factor of (1/6) indicates an integral over
|
|
w^5.
|
|
|
|
One form of Newton's constant, related elsewhere (6), produces a
|
|
value within one percent of experiment by relating the ground-state
|
|
orbital frequency of hydrogen to a cubic electron density in the
|
|
polar-polar potential, thus arriving at the expression,
|
|
|
|
G = ((hc/ã m#^2) (à^3/4ã)^6),
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where "m#" is the electron mass; "h" is Planck's constant; "c" is
|
|
the speed of light, and "à" is the electromagnetic coupling
|
|
constant.
|
|
|
|
A more accurate derivation will reveal the relation of zero-point
|
|
processes to the appearance of a universal effect, while avoiding
|
|
reference to a specific mass scale. This derivation makes use of two
|
|
Casimir expressions, the polar-polar potential quoted before, and
|
|
the wall-wall potential, (hc/2ã r^4), with an explicit form, to
|
|
first order,
|
|
|
|
F = (ãhc/480),
|
|
|
|
also known as the zero-point constant.
|
|
|
|
A curious feature of this second derivation is dual frequency
|
|
dependence, the terms of which originate in well measured attributes
|
|
of the quantum vacuum.
|
|
|
|
Known by a different interpretation as the vacuum conductivity, the
|
|
first frequency,
|
|
|
|
(å=2.65441873*10^-3/t),
|
|
|
|
is the product of c and î, the vacuum dielectric constant. The
|
|
second frequency term is the Lamb shift, w&, which measures the
|
|
effect of z.p.e. on the orbit of an electron in the ground state of
|
|
free hydrogen.
|
|
|
|
Its numeric value, by latest measurement, is
|
|
|
|
(2ã*1.0578458*10^9/t).
|
|
|
|
One may better understand the role of these two frequency scales by
|
|
conducting a dimensional analysis of Newton's constant, which can be
|
|
interpreted as
|
|
|
|
((d/t^2)(1/d1d2)),
|
|
|
|
the ratio between a volume density oscillation, (d/t^2), and two
|
|
interacting volume densities, (d1, d2). Thus, what is sought here is
|
|
some form of vacuum source density oscillation and vacuum source
|
|
density.
|
|
|
|
When one considers the vacuum conductivity to be a plasma frequency,
|
|
and divides the zero-point constant by the square of this frequency,
|
|
a small but significant virtual density factor results,
|
|
|
|
(F/(å^2*(cm)^6))= d0
|
|
|
|
with a numeric value of
|
|
|
|
(1.845214465*10^-13 (gm/cm^3)).
|
|
|
|
Virtual density oscillations (v.d.o.s) in the quantum vacuum are a
|
|
contentious issue, as no acoustic analog process has ever been
|
|
directly observed.
|
|
|
|
A simple way to conceive of such oscillations is to consider the
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vacuum polarization effects of sub-atomic particles. In this light,
|
|
a v.d.o. represents an interaction of polarization and virtual
|
|
particle currents averaged over a finite region of space.
|
|
|
|
Consider, for example, a characteristic density oscillation defined
|
|
by the core term of Casimir's polar-polar potential,
|
|
|
|
((h/2ãc^5)(4àw&/ã)^6),
|
|
|
|
numerically equal to
|
|
|
|
(2.41567929*10^-33 (gm/cm^3*t^2)).
|
|
|
|
According to the dimensional analysis of Newton's constant performed
|
|
earlier, an expression for gravitational coupling could be written
|
|
as the ratio of this density oscillation and the virtual plasma
|
|
density given above:
|
|
|
|
((h/2ãc^5)(4àw&/ã)^6/(d0)^2),
|
|
|
|
yielding the quantity
|
|
|
|
(7.09488846*10^-8 (cm^3/gm t^2)),
|
|
|
|
slightly in excess of the measured value of Newtonian gravity. A
|
|
correction factor, based in part on the zero-point constant
|
|
derivation, produces the near approximation:
|
|
|
|
G = ((h/2ãc^5)(4àw&/ã)^6/(d0)^2)*(1+(ã^2/240))^-1.5
|
|
|
|
*(1+16à^2)^-1*(1+(à^2/2)),
|
|
|
|
with a numeric value of (6.67319759*10^-8 (cm^3/gm t^2)).
|
|
|
|
This may be favorably compared to the experimental value of Newton's
|
|
constant,
|
|
|
|
(6.6732....*10^-8 (cm^3/gm t^2)).
|
|
|
|
Rigorous treatment of the derivation above requires a deep and
|
|
prolonged evaluation by quantum electrodynamic techniques and their
|
|
younger sibling, stochastic electrodynamics.
|
|
|
|
Particular attention must be given to the general nature of v.d.o.s
|
|
and their relation to pair-formation and vacuum polarization. One
|
|
must also question the origin of the reduction factor in the Lamb
|
|
shift, (4à/ã), which might be construed as a secondary result of
|
|
virtual pair orbits.
|
|
|
|
The answer to these, and similar questions, is by no means clear.
|
|
The larger question to answer, "why" there are physical constants,
|
|
is likely to find its answer in the rich structure of the quantum
|
|
vacuum itself, the "nothing" which more and more appears to be the
|
|
source of everything we term "the universe".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix
|
|
|
|
All quantities used in this paper are taken from p. 700, " Quantum
|
|
Electrodynamics", the "Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy
|
|
Physics", Vol. 7, 1987, edited by T. Kinoshita, World Scientific.
|
|
A partial list of these quantities is quoted below.
|
|
|
|
m# electron mass 9.1093897(54)*10^-31 kg
|
|
|
|
e electron charge 1.60217733(49)*10^-19 C
|
|
|
|
h/2ã Planck constant/2ã 1.05457266(63)*10^-34 Js
|
|
|
|
à^-1 inverse fine structure 1.37059895(61)*10^2
|
|
constant
|
|
|
|
c speed of light 2.99792458*10^8 ms^-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bibliography
|
|
|
|
1. A. Zee, "Broken-Symmetric Theory of Gravity", Phys. Rev. Lett.,
|
|
42, 7, 1979
|
|
|
|
2. A. Zee, "Horizon Problem and the Broken-Symmetric Theory of
|
|
Gravity", Phys. Rev. Lett., 44, 11, 1980
|
|
|
|
3. A. Zee, "Spontaneously generated gravity", Phys. Rev. D, 23, 4,
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
4. H.E. Puthoff, "Gravity as a zero-point fluctuation force", Phys.
|
|
Rev. A, 39, 5, 1989
|
|
|
|
5. Larry Spruch, "Retarded, or Casimir, long-range potentials",
|
|
Physics Today, 11/86
|
|
|
|
6. Darrell Moffitt, "CPEDOG", KeelyNet file, 9/91
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
|
|
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
|
|
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
|
|
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
|
|
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4
|
|
|
|
|