199 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
199 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
|
|
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
|
|
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
|
|
PO BOX 1031
|
|
Mesquite, TX 75150
|
|
|
|
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
|
|
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
|
|
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
|
|
|
|
December 24, 1992
|
|
|
|
MAGALT.ASC
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This file is based on personal information from Mr. Lee Jones.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vangard Note
|
|
|
|
I had a recent phone conversation with an interesting fellow in
|
|
which he spoke of a "free energy" device that he had heard of.
|
|
|
|
He heard it from a friend who had seen it while on a tour of duty
|
|
during the Viet Nam War. This file is presented on KeelyNet in
|
|
two forms : MAGALT.ASC - this ASCII text ONLY
|
|
MAGALT1.ZIP - the ASCII text and the MAGALT1.GIF
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
In Lee's own words
|
|
|
|
Here's the best I can remember of what I heard from a good
|
|
friend. He was in Viet Nam during the time when "tourism" was at
|
|
it's worst. <joke> There was a need for a quiet way to make
|
|
electricity (in a jungle environment where noise would show the
|
|
presence of enemies to the Viet Cong)
|
|
|
|
Someone on a NAVY ship figured this design out during a long
|
|
boring trip at sea. The discs (see MAGALT1.GIF) were from some
|
|
kind of ship's motor or generator and when spun they continued to
|
|
do so, causing the alternators attached to them to turn and make
|
|
lots of AC current.
|
|
|
|
His description as far as I can remember is presented in the .GIF
|
|
file. Now, you must understand he is NOT an engineer and his
|
|
description of what he saw may not be corect. For example..the
|
|
"alternators" attached to the magnetic discs might not have been
|
|
alternators but some kind of device that changed the energy that
|
|
traveled down the shafts connecting them to the magnets.
|
|
|
|
What I'm saying is that this is a VERY limited starting point
|
|
from which to attempt to reverse engineer this device. I'm sorry
|
|
but this is the best I can do.
|
|
|
|
He said the Alternators were wired together and that the only
|
|
time the machine stopped working was when the discs got out of
|
|
sync and had to be restarted by aligning a mark on each disc and
|
|
giving them both a spin toward each other from the top.
|
|
|
|
I assume the discs were eccentrically mounted but this is not
|
|
absolute nor is anything else...beg apology... I tried my best
|
|
|
|
Page 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to obtain more info about this design but was unsuccessful. As I
|
|
said he wasn't an engineer and didn't understand what he was
|
|
looking at, other than the obvious; that it was producing power
|
|
without fuel!! He said that there was a fellow in Oregon
|
|
someplace that had built one of these but didn't want anything to
|
|
do with anyone about it.
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Vangard note
|
|
|
|
I might add some of what Lee told me on the phone that would
|
|
further clarify the machine and its operation. The basic
|
|
description of the machine was that it consisted of two identical
|
|
units that were placed next to each other. Each had a magnetic
|
|
disk that was about 3 feet in diameter and from 2 to 3 inches
|
|
thick.
|
|
|
|
Each magnetic disk was mounted on the shaft of the generator
|
|
which when spun caused the generation of current. It would seem
|
|
the weight of the disks caused them to function as flywheels
|
|
with the magnetic field giving a push or pull at the right time.
|
|
(I thought he said on the phone that the disks spun on a vertical
|
|
axis but the drawing (MAGALT1.GIF) refutes that.)
|
|
|
|
He said each of the generators provided EQUAL amounts of energy
|
|
and that the energy that was drawn from each unit must be
|
|
MIRRORED by the other. That is, when one generator was drawn on
|
|
for more power than the other, the unequal loading would cause
|
|
the spinning flywheel magnets to lose their sync and rotate to a
|
|
halt.
|
|
|
|
Each disk had a reference mark that would remain in sync as long
|
|
as the disks spun. The means of starting the wheels to spinning
|
|
was to grab both disks and pull at the same time. They would
|
|
then begin to spin and eventually achieve a stable rotation.
|
|
(Much like how the Testatika machine is started and achieves ITS
|
|
OWN RESONANT velocity!)
|
|
|
|
Lee also said that his source mentioned that the disks were
|
|
slightly off-balance due to being mounted on an eccentric. As I
|
|
understood it during the phone conversation (and now looking at
|
|
the .GIF image) he indicated the disks got closest to each other
|
|
WHEN THE SYNC MARK came around.
|
|
|
|
If the polarization was on the north half of the disk (imagine a bar
|
|
magnet in the center of the disk, and there could be more than one)
|
|
with the south being on the opposite half, it would then provide the
|
|
maximum polar repulsion as the disks came into contact at the
|
|
closest eccentric proximity point.
|
|
|
|
Since like poles REPEL, then one can see how the axis of the north
|
|
OR south pole would have the greatest force while the equator would
|
|
provide the least due to field cancellation.
|
|
|
|
As it rotated around, the repulsion would gradually DECREASE as it
|
|
approached the equator (90 degrees from the pole). On passing the
|
|
equator, the velocity from the repulsion of the last orbit would
|
|
continue to drive the disk through the INCREASING repulsion of the
|
|
opposite south pole, though at a much LESSER INTENSITY because of
|
|
the greater distance between the poles. (this is the trick, how to
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
overcome that increasing replusion to cause the disk to go over the
|
|
"hump")
|
|
|
|
This means that when the sync lines that were drawn on each disk
|
|
were lined up, the disks would be CLOSEST to one another. 180
|
|
degrees from that point, the opposite sync lines would mean the
|
|
disks would be at the GREATEST distance due to the eccentric.
|
|
|
|
So, with the addition of the eccentric rotation (which Lee said was
|
|
about 1/4" distance at the closest point of the disks, the closer
|
|
the better) then the REPULSION WOULD BE GREATEST when the axis of
|
|
each pole lined up. For those without graphics capabilities, I have
|
|
included an ASCII equivalent drawing so you can get an idea of the
|
|
machine.
|
|
least repulsion
|
|
at neutral magnetic equator
|
|
|
|
3 foot wide disk 3 foot wide disk
|
|
ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ 2-3"
|
|
³ magnetic disk ͵SyncÆÍ magnetic disk ³ thick
|
|
ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÄÙmarkÀÄÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ
|
|
ÚÄÁÄÄÄÁÄ¿ ÚÄÁÄÄÄÁÄ¿
|
|
³ ³ eccentric³ ³
|
|
Generator ³ ³ mounted ³ ³ Generator
|
|
One ³ ³ on shaft ³ ³ Two
|
|
ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ
|
|
shown at farthest proximity
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
greatest repulsion at poles
|
|
ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿
|
|
sync markÆÍ S N ³³ N S ͵ sync mark
|
|
180 out ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÄÄÄÙÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ 180 out
|
|
ÚÄÁÄÄÄÁÄ¿ ÚÄÁÄÄÄÁÄ¿
|
|
³ ³ ³ ³
|
|
Generator ³ ³ ³ ³ Generator
|
|
One ³ ³ ³ ³ Two
|
|
ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ
|
|
shown at closest proximity
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
One more point that Lee said on the phone, though I might be
|
|
mistaken. As I remember the conversation, he said he thought the
|
|
disks might have been slightly tilted (on the horizontal axis).
|
|
|
|
If there was a weight added to one side of the disk, probably at the
|
|
sync mark, then that might give an additional impetus to accelerate
|
|
the rotation to overcome the increasing repulsion on the "uptake".
|
|
|
|
The machine would appear to operate on a very common principle
|
|
associated with most perpetual motion devices. Most machines are
|
|
lucky to achieve 60% efficiency. 100% would be unity and anything
|
|
over that would be overunity. The idea with overunity is for the
|
|
machine to be able to provide enough energy to sustain its operation
|
|
in a closed system. Anything beyond what that takes would thus be
|
|
"free energy." We would appreciate your comments on this matter.
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
|
|
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
|
|
If we can be of service, you may contact
|
|
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Page 3
|
|
|
|
|