380 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext
380 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext
September 1990
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
|
|
John L. Pape, Chief of Police
|
|
Weslaco, Texas, Police Department
|
|
|
|
|
|
Police administrators of small law enforcement agencies face
|
|
great challenges as they seek to provide service with severely
|
|
limited financial resources. An area often overlooked as having
|
|
revenue-saving potential is employee retention. There is no
|
|
doubt that excessive employee turnover financially drains any
|
|
police agency, regardless of size. But, in a smaller agency, it
|
|
can be fiscally devastating. One option is for administrators to
|
|
consider using a well-structured employee development program to
|
|
manage employee turnover effectively.
|
|
|
|
THE PROBLEM
|
|
|
|
When a law enforcement agency experiences high employee
|
|
turnover, it must then bear the expense of recruiting, testing,
|
|
hiring, training, and equipping replacement officers. In the
|
|
smaller police agency, expenses related to employee turnover
|
|
easily lead to acute problems, such as manpower shortages, which
|
|
usually must be compensated for with overtime expense. The
|
|
strain placed on the remaining officers can result in poor morale
|
|
and a loss of overall effectiveness and safety. As a result, the
|
|
potential for liability may also increase as officers become more
|
|
likely to make serious mistakes due to fatigue.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, police administrators have often taken the
|
|
position that little can be done to prevent employee turnover.
|
|
And, many administrators of smaller agencies believe that they
|
|
cannot compete with larger ones that are able to offer better pay
|
|
with more opportunities for advancement and personal fulfillment.
|
|
These administrators traditionally accept the fact that their
|
|
most talented officers will be drawn to larger agencies after a
|
|
year or two. This, in turn, causes them to possibly reject
|
|
capable applicants because of their anticipated short tenure with
|
|
the agency.
|
|
|
|
In accepting this role as a stepping stone to larger
|
|
departments, the small agency finds itself with continuing
|
|
personnel turnover and the related financial burden.
|
|
Additionally, the level of service can suffer due to the lack of
|
|
experienced officers, leading to possible problems in public
|
|
satisfaction with a police agency's mandate to protect and serve.
|
|
|
|
The traditional solution to this problem is to increase pay
|
|
and benefits for officers to compete with larger departments.
|
|
Unfortunately, most smaller communities do not have the necessary
|
|
financial resources. In addition, even with reasonably
|
|
competitive pay and benefits, an officer who is not allowed to
|
|
experience personal and professional growth may begin to look
|
|
for an agency with greater opportunities.
|
|
|
|
THE APPROACH
|
|
|
|
What motivates employees to do their jobs to the best of
|
|
their abilities, or in this case, to remain with a particular
|
|
police department? According to Abraham Maslow, human needs can
|
|
be plotted on a hierarchy that begins with the most basic needs
|
|
and progresses to the most complex. This process toward
|
|
self-actualization progresses according to the following:
|
|
|
|
* Physiological needs--need for survival, food, shelter;
|
|
|
|
* Safety needs--need for security and absence of threat;
|
|
|
|
* Affiliation needs--need for close, affectionate
|
|
relationships;
|
|
|
|
* Achievement and esteem--need to achieve goals and
|
|
self-respect; and,
|
|
|
|
* Self-actualization--need to develop skills and abilities
|
|
to the maximum. (1)
|
|
|
|
In simplest terms, this means reaching one's greatest
|
|
potential. While police departments tend to view motivation in
|
|
terms of providing sufficient pay and benefits to attract and
|
|
retain employees, they often fail to recognize that human needs
|
|
and motivation do not stop there.
|
|
|
|
Douglas McGregor evaluated Maslow's hierarchy of needs in
|
|
terms of employment and introduced the relationship between needs
|
|
and work to modern management. According to McGregor, Maslow's
|
|
concepts relate to work as follows:
|
|
|
|
* Physiological--employee needs to perform the job to
|
|
retain the position and receive pay;
|
|
|
|
* Safety--employee needs and desires job security;
|
|
|
|
* Affiliation--employee needs to achieve acceptance within
|
|
a work group. This relates to productivity in that an
|
|
employee's output will generally conform to the group's
|
|
performance standard as a means of gaining acceptance;
|
|
|
|
* Achievement/Esteem--employee seeks opportunities to
|
|
achieve, be recognized and to advance; and,
|
|
|
|
* Self-actualization--employee is given the opportunity to
|
|
meet challenges that are personally meaningful. (2)
|
|
|
|
While the traditional incentives of money and benefits may
|
|
help to satisfy the lower levels of the hierarchy, they do not
|
|
promote superior performance or employee retention, nor do they
|
|
help to satisfy the needs in the upper levels of the hierarchy.
|
|
These upper levels are the levels that the most highly motivated
|
|
employees are attempting to achieve, and they are also the levels
|
|
least likely to be satisfied in agencies with no employee
|
|
development program.
|
|
|
|
THE SOLUTION
|
|
|
|
For smaller agencies the key to resolving excessive
|
|
employee turnover may be to offer a structured employee
|
|
development program. While this may not completely solve the
|
|
problem, it does enhance the employee's tenure in both time and
|
|
quality of service.
|
|
|
|
Many police departments tend to view motivation simply in
|
|
terms of providing sufficient pay and benefits to attract and
|
|
retain employees. However, in doing this, they often fail to
|
|
recognize that while money and benefits may satisfy the
|
|
lower-ranking police officer, they do not promote superior
|
|
performance or employee retention nor do they satisfy the needs
|
|
of higher-ranking officers.
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, most people need to be recognized for their
|
|
efforts and want to do a good job because it helps to satisfy
|
|
their need to feel worthwhile. However, when obstacles are
|
|
placed in their way, such as a lack of recognition, inadequate
|
|
rewards/reinforcement, and a lack of professional and personal
|
|
growth opportunities, employees become frustrated. Therefore,
|
|
the key is to structure an educational development program to
|
|
attract highly motivated applicants and to help employees fulfill
|
|
needs traditionally overlooked. And, while employees may
|
|
eventually move into other agencies, the program helps to ensure
|
|
that during their tenure, officers will be more motivated and
|
|
want to perform as best they can.
|
|
|
|
The employee development program can be as extensive as the
|
|
administrator wishes, but it must incorporate at least the
|
|
following points:
|
|
|
|
* Implementation of high professional standards
|
|
|
|
* A strong reward/reinforcement plan
|
|
|
|
* An educational incentive plan, and
|
|
|
|
* A professional development plan.
|
|
|
|
High Professional Standards
|
|
|
|
High professional standards are vital to an employee
|
|
development program simply because anything less would not
|
|
attract the more highly qualified and more motivated individual.
|
|
Agencies must reflect a sufficient degree of professionalism for
|
|
employees to take pride in their jobs. This process begins with a
|
|
positive and professional recruiting and hiring process aimed at
|
|
identifying the most qualified applicants.
|
|
|
|
Further, a professional approach to policing includes the
|
|
professional appearance of personnel, vehicles, and facilities.
|
|
In addition, a thorough procedural manual and code of conduct is
|
|
vital, as is a comprehensive and fair disciplinary system.
|
|
Training and management procedures must also adhere to the
|
|
highest professional standards. But, above all, pride and
|
|
professionalism must be emphasized continually to all personnel.
|
|
|
|
Reward/Reinforcement System
|
|
|
|
The second point of the employee development program
|
|
involves a strong reward/reinforcement system. Too often,
|
|
management only doles out disciplinary action and neglects to
|
|
recognize employees who deserve commendation. By implementing a
|
|
strong reward/reinforcement system, smaller agencies promote the
|
|
delivery of superior police service and greatly improve
|
|
departmental morale.
|
|
|
|
This recognition program can be as simple or as elaborate as
|
|
the department administrator wishes. For example, commendable
|
|
acts of a lesser nature can be acknowledged through letters of
|
|
commendation. For more noteworthy acts, departmental
|
|
certificates of commendation can be issued. For the most
|
|
noteworthy acts, police recognition medals or ribbons can be
|
|
awarded to deserving personnel. Criteria for various police
|
|
awards can be established on a departmental basis. Additionally,
|
|
the local media should be notified and the officer publicly
|
|
praised.
|
|
|
|
Educational Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
The third, and most important, facet of an employee
|
|
development program is an educational incentive plan. Such a
|
|
plan allows for the officer's educational development, while
|
|
making that officer a more productive and effective member of
|
|
the department. It also naturally attracts applicants who want
|
|
to pursue higher education. Obviously, the officer who desires
|
|
personal improvement is highly motivated and a desirable asset
|
|
to any department. And, by encouraging educational development,
|
|
an agency can ensure the officer's retention at least until
|
|
completion of college. Normally, it will take an officer 5 to 8
|
|
years to complete a baccalaureate degree program, depending on
|
|
the course load the officer carries.
|
|
|
|
An educational incentive plan could also include a pay
|
|
scale based on education and a tuition reimbursement plan. The
|
|
incentive pay scale can be adjusted to the needs of the
|
|
individual department. And, to ensure that the semester hours
|
|
represent quality work, the department may wish to recognize
|
|
only those hours that meet a set quality point average.
|
|
Compared to across-the-board pay raises, an incentive plan can
|
|
be substantially less expensive.
|
|
|
|
Under the tuition reimbursement portion of the plan,
|
|
officers enroll in the course(s) at an accredited institution at
|
|
their own expense. After successfully completing the course(s),
|
|
officers who verify completion would be appropriately reimbursed.
|
|
As with the incentive pay scale, an agency may wish to reimburse
|
|
only those course(s) completed with a grade of ``C'' or better.
|
|
Also, limiting the number of reimbursable hours per semester
|
|
prevents employees from overloading, which could result in
|
|
decreased proficiency in both academic pursuits and at work.
|
|
|
|
Work schedules should be structured to allow employees to
|
|
attend classes. This can be accomplished by rotating shifts in
|
|
conjunction with local university semesters. While an occasional
|
|
conflict may arise, they can usually be easily resolved.
|
|
An educational incentive plan restructures the pay scale and
|
|
rewards employees for pursuing and achieving educational goals.
|
|
By implementing such a plan, an agency benefits from better
|
|
educated, highly motivated, and personally fulfilled employees.
|
|
|
|
Professional Development
|
|
|
|
For those employees seeking personal fulfillment from
|
|
professional ability rather than through formal education, a
|
|
program for professional development is essential. Too often,
|
|
employees are not offered sufficient opportunities for
|
|
professional development and tend to remain in rigidly assigned
|
|
positions. However, a reasonable system of rotating
|
|
assignments, patrol enhancement techniques, and training
|
|
opportunities can be initiated. The number of officers involved
|
|
at a given time, and the frequency of assignment rotation, can
|
|
be tailored to a particular department's needs.
|
|
|
|
Rotating assignments can be as simple as assigning a patrol
|
|
officer to work in another assignment for a temporary period of
|
|
time. After completing the temporary duty, the patrol officer
|
|
will have gained knowledge and practical experience in another
|
|
police function while experiencing professional growth. Such
|
|
temporary assignments also allow administrators to evaluate the
|
|
employee's performance in the temporary position for possible
|
|
later consideration for permanent assignments.
|
|
|
|
Patrol enhancement is another method that can stimulate and
|
|
develop an officer's abilities. Patrol enhancement is simply
|
|
allowing an officer to answer the initial call, conduct the
|
|
investigation, file the charges, obtain the arrest warrant, and
|
|
arrest the perpetrator without the assistance of another officer.
|
|
In many agencies, this is often done out of necessity. However,
|
|
as departments grow, they tend to become more specialized. This
|
|
lets officers know that they are vital players in the
|
|
department's mission. While such a program can be tailored to
|
|
any agency, the key to patrol enhancement is for the
|
|
administrator to view patrol officers as vital resources.
|
|
|
|
A final step in an agency's professional development
|
|
program involves an aggressive use of police training resources.
|
|
Many times, training opportunities end with the basic academy or
|
|
the fulfillment of State-mandated minimums. Even so, an agency
|
|
can offer a variety of opportunities for professional training.
|
|
If the agency is too small to offer formal inservice training,
|
|
it can use the resources of regional police academies, technical
|
|
training centers, and even larger neighboring police
|
|
departments. While every officer cannot attend every course,
|
|
the administrator should allow as many officers as possible to
|
|
participate. Another avenue to encourage officers to augment
|
|
training on their own time is for an agency to consider paying
|
|
for meals and providing transportation. What is important is
|
|
that officers not be discouraged from developing themselves
|
|
professionally.
|
|
|
|
THE MERCEDES POLICE EXPERIENCE
|
|
|
|
In 1986, an employee development program was a major factor
|
|
in the departmental reorganization of the Mercedes, Texas, Police
|
|
Department. The department is comprised of 25 officers serving a
|
|
municipality of approximately 14,000 persons.
|
|
|
|
The first step of the reorganization was to establish high
|
|
professional standards throughout the department. Once these
|
|
standards were established, the department implemented a
|
|
rewards/reinforcement system to recognize and promote superior
|
|
performance. As a result, the delivery of police service showed
|
|
an immediate marked improvement, and public confidence increased.
|
|
|
|
Patrol enhancement in the form of limited follow-up
|
|
responsibility in certain offenses, team policing duties, and
|
|
walking patrol assignments became a part of the program.
|
|
Officers were extremely receptive to these duties and soon began
|
|
to suggest that more assignments be added to the patrol
|
|
enhancement program. The public was also quick to note the
|
|
officers' increased involvement.
|
|
|
|
The department then initiated a policy requiring a minimum
|
|
of 40 hours inservice training per year per officer. In
|
|
addition, a wide variety of training was offered to police
|
|
personnel. At the end of 1986, after 7 months of this policy,
|
|
each officer had achieved an average of 96 hours of training. By
|
|
the end of 1987, this average increased to 109 hours of training
|
|
per officer.
|
|
|
|
Prior to implementing the educational incentive plan, only
|
|
two officers had any college-level education, only one had an
|
|
associate's degree in law enforcement from a community college,
|
|
and one officer was attending college. Within the first year of
|
|
the program, 6 officers earned college credits, and 10 were
|
|
actively enrolled in college courses. In addition, recruiting
|
|
efforts attracted three officers with an average of 2 years'
|
|
college experience, all of whom indicated that they were
|
|
attracted to the department because it would allow them to
|
|
continue their education.
|
|
|
|
Subsequent recruiting efforts also resulted in applicants
|
|
who were well-educated, highly motivated, and extremely desirable
|
|
candidates for employment. In addition, prior to the
|
|
implementation of the employee development program, the agency's
|
|
turnover rate was 38 percent. In the 24-month period following
|
|
the full implementation of the employee development program, the
|
|
turnover rate decreased to 7 percent. (3) This reduction in the
|
|
turnover rate resulted in an estimated budgetary savings of at
|
|
least $53,000.
|
|
|
|
CONCLUSION
|
|
|
|
A properly structured and managed employee development
|
|
program can be extremely beneficial to both the police
|
|
department and the police officer. By structuring the program
|
|
to appeal to highly motivated individuals, providing them with
|
|
opportunities to satisfy their needs for esteem and
|
|
self-actualization, and allowing them an opportunity to
|
|
contribute to the overall mission of the organization, a police
|
|
department can significantly improve employee job satisfaction.
|
|
This job satisfaction will translate into improved morale,
|
|
greater initiative, and a desire to deliver superior service to
|
|
the community. This program will also significantly reduce
|
|
employee turnover within the smaller agency which, in turn,
|
|
saves the department money.
|
|
|
|
Departments should realize that the initial expense of
|
|
implementing an employee development program is minimal when
|
|
compared to the benefits it can offer to both the law enforcement
|
|
agency and the officer. But, most importantly, as a result of
|
|
the program, employees experience professional growth and
|
|
development, and the agency gains better trained and personally
|
|
satisfied employees.
|
|
|
|
FOOTNOTES
|
|
|
|
(1) Abraham H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality (New York:
|
|
Harper and Row Company, 1954).
|
|
|
|
(2) Douglas McGregor, The Human Side of Enterprise (New York:
|
|
Viking Press, Inc., 1971).
|
|
|
|
(3) An annual turnover rate of 5 to 15 percent is generally
|
|
considered to be within the acceptable range for a fully
|
|
developed organization. But, the ideal turnover rate is 7
|
|
percent. Roy Clinton McLaren and O.W. Wilson, Police
|
|
Administration (New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing, 1977).
|
|
|