Files
2021-04-15 13:31:59 -05:00

148 lines
9.7 KiB
Plaintext

SUBJECT: MORE ON ABDUCTION OF DECEMBER 8 FILE: UFO3283
ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿
³ The following file is courtesy of HUFON REPORT, ³
³ the newsletter of the Houston UFO Network. ³
³ For more information, contact Ron Joseph at ³
³ HUFON's BBS, UFOnline - (713) 558-5342. ³
³ ---------------------------------------------------------------- ³
³ Technical Analysis Report ³
³ prepared by Dr. Rod Lewis ³
³ ³
³ Date: April 20, 1993 ³
³ ³
³Investigators: ³
³ ³
³Dr. Rod Lewis ³
³Acting Technical Analyst, Houston UFO Network ³
³ ³
³Derrel Sims, C.H.T. ³
³Chief Abductions Investigator, Houston UFO Network ³
³ ³
³ ³
³HISTORY: This specimen was obtained from a female subject on ³
³December 11, 1992. The subject will herein be referred to as ³
³DS92009LT. The subject reported recovering the object from ³
³her eye on the morning of December 11, 1992. She stated that ³
³she awakened with an irritation and while rubbing her eye, ³
³a small particle, about the size of a mustard seed, was ³
³recovered. The specimen was turned over to Derrel Sims, Chief ³
³Abductions Investigator, Houston UFO Network. The specimen ³
³was photographed and stored in a plastic case. ³
³ ³
³Subject DS92009LT reported to have been part of a mass ³
³abduction in Houston, Texas on the night of December 8, 1992. ³
³The subject reports that an implant was placed behind one of ³
³her eyes during the abduction. The complete report on the ³
³mass abduction of December 8, 1992 can be obtained under ³
³separate cover. ³
³ ³
³PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: The specimen has been viewed ³
³under a standard light and stereoscopic microscopes. It ³
³appears flesh toned with an "egg" shape, approximately ³
³1 - 1.5mm in length, and has a hollow interior. The apex has ³
³been truncated and lateral splitting from the apical area ³
³distally is noted. ³
³ ³
³The exterior of the specimen appears different from the ³
³interior. The exterior is smooth and non-porous with a ³
³mottled appearance. The interior has a spongy "honey- ³
³combed" appearance, and is lighter in contrast to the exterior. ³
³The specimen is resilient and does not permanently deform ³
³with pressure or manipulation. ³
³ ³
³PHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS: ³
³Length: 1-1.5mm ³
³Height: .25-.5mm (at highest point) ³
³Width: .25-.5mm (at widest point) ³
³Weight: N/A ³
³Specific Gravity: N/A ³
³Tensile Strength: N/A* ³
³Melting Point: N/A* ³
³Solubility: N/A* ³
³ ³
³N/A* = potentially destructive measurements ³
³ ³
³TAXONOMY: The specimen was taken to the Department of ³
³Biology at the University of Houston. It was examined by ³
³several doctoral and post-doctoral students. The specimen did ³
³not fit any known taxonomic classification. It was determined ³
³that the specimen was not biological. ³
³QUALITATIVE ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS: Qualitative elemental ³
³analysis was performed on April 14, 1992 at the ³
³Superconductivity Laboratory, University of Houston, using an ³
³electron microprobe. A small sample was taken from the ³
³specimen for analysis. Microprobes were taken from various ³
³locations on the sample, and are considered to be ³
³representative of the specimen. ³
³ ³
³The following elements were found throughout the probe. This ³
³list does not reflect any particular order or percentages. ³
³ ³
³1) Carbon* ³
³2) Oxygen* ³
³3) Silicon** ³
³4) Titanium** ³
³5) Barium** ³
³6) Beryllium*** ³
³7) Sulphur*** ³
³8) Aluminum*** ³
³ ³
³* Primary constituents ³
³** Secondary constituents ³
³*** Tertiary constituents ³
³ ³
³Although absolute percentages of elements cannot be ³
³determined with this method, the specimen appeared to be ³
³carbon rich, suggesting that it is organic. The other earth ³
³elements are suspected to be present in trace quantities ³
³only, but have been determined to be part of the specimen and ³
³not contaminants. However, this hypothesis cannot be ³
³substantiated without quantitative analysis. ³
³ ³
³The probe also determined that the material was electrically ³
³non-conductive. ³
³ ³
³ANOMALIES: There are a few notable anomalies in the ³
³specimen. It is unusual for titanium and silicon to be present in ³
³a compound which is carbon rich and containing oxygen. It is ³
³also not consistent with the textural features of the ³
³specimen. Compounds containing titanium and silicon tend to ³
³be much more rigid and brittle. Also, the presence of ³
³beryllium is unusual in that it is normally found only in ³
³compounds which are electrically conductive. ³
³ ³
³SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: The specimen obtained from ³
³subject DS92009LT is an ovoid, flesh-toned object approximately ³
³1-1.5 mm in length with a hollow core. Based on taxonomic ³
³examination it is non-biological. Qualitative analysis ³
³suggests a carbon rich non-conductive material with some ³
³unusual combinations of trace elements. The substance is most ³
³likely a high molecular weight organic compound. Polymers ³
³(plastics) are the most likely compounds to fit the elemental ³
³profile. ³
³ ³
³RECOMMENDATIONS: ³
³ ³
³1. Determine if the specimen is a polymer. This may be ³
³ accomplished through HPLC (high pressure liquid ³
³ chromatography) if a sample of the specimen is soluble in ³
³ an organic solvent. ³
³ ³
³2. Consultation with a polymer chemist for additional tests ³
³ which may be available. ³
³ ³
³End of File ³
ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ
*********************************************************************
* -------->>> THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo <<<------- *
*********************************************************************