505 lines
24 KiB
Plaintext
505 lines
24 KiB
Plaintext
WARNING: This post contains spoilers (though mostly general ones) for the
|
|
fifth season of "Star Trek: the Next Generation". Those not familiar with
|
|
the season and wanting to avoid spoilers should stay clear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well...here we are again. Another season gone by, which means another
|
|
season's review to write.
|
|
|
|
I'm going to change the format of this review, in several ways. Primarily,
|
|
although I'll still be quickly going over each episode in turn and then
|
|
averaging them, I'm going to have a long general piece afterwards, because
|
|
this season (far more than most) is not at *all* expressible as the sum of
|
|
its parts.
|
|
|
|
And the usual disclaimer, although it'll be obvious: the individual ratings
|
|
I give here will not necessarily correspond to my original ratings. Part of
|
|
the whole point of this piece is to show how opinions evolve over time, from
|
|
the first impressions (i.e. the initial review) to the somewhat more sedate
|
|
thoughts after another viewing or two. (Yes, I rewatched the season for
|
|
this...even "Cost of Living".)
|
|
|
|
So: onwards!
|
|
|
|
Episodic: |
|
|
----------+
|
|
|
|
"Redemption II"
|
|
Initial rating: 6.5.
|
|
|
|
My opinion of this one hasn't changed much. It still had a great opening 10
|
|
minutes or so, and then fell apart over the rest of the hour. Some of the
|
|
strategizing is nice (Picard really does feel like someone born to eventual
|
|
admiralty; he'll love having a full-time fleet to command), and some of it
|
|
isn't; it's about here that the Romulans start turning into buffoons. And
|
|
then, of course, there's Sela, the lifetime holder of the
|
|
Slap-Em-In-The-Face-And-Call-'Em-Bruised Origins Award. Pah.
|
|
|
|
Finally, they tried to do too much here, and ended up doing too little. Both
|
|
Worf's adaptation (or lack thereof) to Klingon society and Data's first
|
|
command could have used entire episodes devoted to them; instead, we get them
|
|
as side issues to the apparent main plot of the civil war. Sigh.
|
|
|
|
All in all, I think I'd drop this down to a 5. It had its moments, but it
|
|
needed a lot more.
|
|
|
|
"Darmok"
|
|
Initial rating: 9.5.
|
|
|
|
This one comes up to a full 10. The one thing that had riled me at the time
|
|
(Riker's overbelligerent behavior) doesn't seem nearly so bad after I've had
|
|
time to look at it further. Yes, there's a wee bit of technobabble here and
|
|
there, and a couple of bits that are _marginally_ slow, but nothing nearly
|
|
enough to take away from the sheer power of this very simple idea. Second
|
|
best of the season.
|
|
|
|
"Ensign Ro"
|
|
Initial rating: 7.
|
|
|
|
This one slips. Again, there's some nice strategizing on Picard's part (and
|
|
again, he enjoys it far too much to be confined to a single ship; get this
|
|
man a cosmic chessboard!), and there are also bits of very snappy dialogue.
|
|
Unfortunately, much of it occurs in a vacuum, and Les Landau's direction is a
|
|
bit off. This was a straightforward piece with straightforward advantages
|
|
and flaws. Down to a 6.
|
|
|
|
"Silicon Avatar"
|
|
Initial rating: 9.5.
|
|
|
|
This one also slips. The things I loved about it most at the time, namely
|
|
the late-episode Marr and the very bleak ending, are still there and still
|
|
superb (as is the Entity's initial attack; it *still* hurts to see the
|
|
colony's fate after the team is rescued). Unfortunately, with the bloom off
|
|
the rose, it's very difficult to reconcile the late-term Marr with the
|
|
early-term Marr; it's almost two different characters. I can't quite swallow
|
|
it. This is still good, but no longer top-notch. Call it an 8.5.
|
|
|
|
"Disaster"
|
|
Initial rating: 2.
|
|
|
|
You *must* be kidding. I thought this was pretty damned dumb then, and I
|
|
think it's pretty damned dumb now. Almost all my initial attitudes (all the
|
|
kids are a waste but Marissa, for instance, and that Worf's characterization
|
|
is *awful) hold up, the only exception being that Keiko's lines seem a bit
|
|
funnier now. This marks the beginning, incidentally, of the "let's make Worf
|
|
a laughingstock" version of Worf that seems to characterize virtually every
|
|
Worf show this season. This is still a 2.
|
|
|
|
"The Game"
|
|
Initial rating: 6.
|
|
|
|
This was, and still is, a very uneven piece. Lots of the dialogue is very
|
|
crisp and fun, but some of it falls very flat (unfortunately, the examples
|
|
just flew out of my brain heading west; if someone could catch them and send
|
|
them back I'd be obliged). The idea of something insinuating itself on the
|
|
ship almost insidiously is a nice one, but it gets some poor handling. (Troi
|
|
playing the bimbo in Ten-Forward, for instance, and Riker playing WITH a
|
|
bimbo down on Risa; yawn.) And of course, there's the fact that in bringing
|
|
back Wesley for the first time in a season, the natural impetus was to put
|
|
him right back in the first-season cliches that had a lot of people clamoring
|
|
for the character's head on a platter back then. Still, it is a fun ride.
|
|
I'll keep this as a 6.
|
|
|
|
"Unification I"
|
|
Initial rating: 9.5.
|
|
|
|
The bloom is off the rose here as well, but only a little bit. Yes, this and
|
|
its successor were *very* hyped; and yes, like most things that hyped, it
|
|
doesn't quite live up. But despite some of the problems and slow moments
|
|
this piece had (the Picard/Data amateurish conduct on Romulus, the scene with
|
|
Perrin, etc.), the fact is that I felt caught up in something big, and that
|
|
feeling still sits in the show. It's a 45-minute prologue, yes; but as the
|
|
people I saw "Back to the Future II" with can tell you, if it's done well I
|
|
can really enjoy movie-length prologues. Give it a 9.
|
|
|
|
"Unification II"
|
|
Initial rating: 10.
|
|
|
|
This show's taken a pummeling from most people, and I have to admit that I
|
|
still don't really understand why. There are a couple of loose leaps in the
|
|
plot (most notably the jump from blowing up the mystery ship to Riker looking
|
|
for a fat Ferengi in the bar), and a couple of bad scenes (I *still* have an
|
|
intense dislike for Klingon opera), but it's not enough to cause any real
|
|
problems. And yes, Sela's plan here is an intensely hokey plot that couldn't
|
|
possibly work; and the point being? I'd knock this down to a 9, but again no
|
|
further.
|
|
|
|
"A Matter of Time"
|
|
Initial rating: 7.
|
|
|
|
This one also slips a bit. (That's starting to sound typical.) My basic
|
|
impression of this, when all is said and done, is that it's "shallow but
|
|
clever". The plot involving Rasmussen isn't the sort of thing that's going
|
|
to win awards for originality or sheer ability to draw one in, but it makes
|
|
for a good bag of tricks; and now and then, sitting back and watching a bag
|
|
of tricks can be fun. (The plot involving the planet, and Picard's speech in
|
|
particular, is definitely a bit much, however.) Frewer is good, although I
|
|
do have to wonder how this show would have changed were Robin Williams to
|
|
have played this part. Down to a 5.
|
|
|
|
"New Ground"
|
|
Initial rating: 9.
|
|
|
|
I went back and looked at that rating right before I watched the show again,
|
|
and my thought throughout was "I gave this a NINE? WHY?" Looking back, I
|
|
have absolutely no idea what about this show made it that appealing back in
|
|
January. I don't consider it the trash others have called it, but it's got
|
|
problems. It sets up a bunch of potentially interesting conflicts, but they
|
|
don't *really* go anywhere. (They go further here than later in the season,
|
|
though; more on that later.) The "jeopardy" plot was...well, "harmless"
|
|
seems the best word to use. This had a few nice ideas, but blew most of them
|
|
in the execution. (On the other hand, by setting up "Murphy Worf" here, it
|
|
would seem that TNG will no doubt soon get an angry letter from the
|
|
ever-esteemed Mr. Quayle...:-) :-) ) This guy's a 4.
|
|
|
|
"Hero Worship"
|
|
Initial rating: 8.5.
|
|
|
|
That rating seems about right, give or take a point. It's a solid outing;
|
|
probably the only solid outing this season that centered on a child. The
|
|
main reason for this, of course, was that the fellow who played Timothy was a
|
|
rare find: a *really good* child actor. But beyond that, the concept of a
|
|
child "imprinting" on Data was an interesting one, and one fairly well
|
|
explored. Yes, the ending was a bit rushed and the science was *intensely*
|
|
silly, but that's not a big problem. Hmm...yep, 8.5 seems about right.
|
|
|
|
"Violations"
|
|
Initial rating: 6.5.
|
|
|
|
This one came up on a repeat viewing. I think some of my initial qualms
|
|
about it may have had to do with what I'd been led to believe about its
|
|
origins (I'd been led to believe a friend of mine had written it; that belief
|
|
turned out to be in error, as I found out rather sharply before long), and
|
|
that's no longer a factor. It's still got some problems, most notably that
|
|
(1) the story could have been made *much* more ambiguous, rather than waving
|
|
a giant flag saying "yo! Jev's the villain here!" back in the teaser, and
|
|
(2) the sudden rekindling of romance in the Riker/Troi scene in sickbay seems
|
|
to come flying out of left field. But on a repeat viewing, this actually
|
|
became *spookier*, which is always a good sign. So, I'd say "Attack of the
|
|
Killer Jerry Brown" [well, LOOK at him! :-) ] ends up with an 8.
|
|
|
|
"The Masterpiece Society"
|
|
Initial rating: 7.5.
|
|
|
|
This is also going to end up about where it started. My main points still
|
|
rang very true: Hannah was a terrific character (if a lousy depiction of a
|
|
scientist; "theoretical physics", my ass), and played very well off of
|
|
Geordi. The Troi/Aaron scenes still scream "we are totally unnecessary!" to
|
|
me, and the bind the Enterprise finds itself in at the end is still nicely
|
|
done. On the other hand, the "the Prime Directive doesn't apply; they're
|
|
human" rankles a lot more than it did before; would these people PLEASE get
|
|
straight just what the PD is and what it applies to? (I still have the
|
|
rudiments of a story in mind for that, come to think of it...) Call it a 7.
|
|
|
|
"Conundrum"
|
|
Initial rating: 10.
|
|
|
|
This isn't going anywhere. It's still a terrific "fish out of water" story,
|
|
and the only complaints I've heard are all plausibility-based rather than
|
|
plot-based (and I can accept a *lot* more plausibility stretches than plot
|
|
stupidities). Bits of it are very slightly overplayed, but not nearly enough
|
|
to cause more than a momentary pang. Well planned and well executed; still a
|
|
10.
|
|
|
|
"Power Play"
|
|
Initial rating: 7.5.
|
|
|
|
This one slips. It's a decent ride, a la "Redemption II", but on a repeat
|
|
viewing it ends up looking really, really shallow. Unfortunately, the bad
|
|
aspects jump out more on a repeat than the good; the rather poor acting on
|
|
the part of all three O'Briens (Miles, Keiko, and little
|
|
Cliche...er...Molly), and some of the sizable plot problems. (It didn't help
|
|
that this came right off of "Conundrum", which was much tighter in its
|
|
planning than this.) On the other hand, Spiner is still terrific here, and
|
|
Sirtis does a good job overall, especially in the first half. Call this a 6
|
|
for a roller-coaster ride.
|
|
|
|
"Ethics"
|
|
Initial rating: 5.
|
|
|
|
That seems about right. Like "New Ground" (only more so), this had a decent
|
|
premise dully done. Just about all the strength of the show came out of the
|
|
Bev/Russell interactions; scientific ethics is something that greatly
|
|
interests me, and this seemed very well done. The rest of the good bits all
|
|
sit pretty much in the two Worf/Riker scenes; that seemed real friendship.
|
|
But Troi, with only about half a scene's exception, is window dressing with a
|
|
lot of lines, and Alexander's presence is positively galling. And then, of
|
|
course, that awful, awful, *awful* ending in the surgery. We were not
|
|
supposed to laugh at that, and I couldn't stop. Still, the Bev/Russell stuff
|
|
is strong enough that this stays a 5.
|
|
|
|
"The Outcast"
|
|
Initial rating: 3.
|
|
|
|
Again, this seems fairly close to the mark. It gets a few points for good
|
|
intentions; this show's heart was really in the right place. But between the
|
|
inclusion of every plot contrivance in the book, some very dull direction,
|
|
and some outright MIScharacterization (Worf in particular, but Riker to some
|
|
extent), this suffered a lot. And additionally, in making the *explicit*
|
|
point about gender intolerance, this show contained so much *implicit* sexism
|
|
and discrimination as to feel extraordinarily hypocritical. I still hate to
|
|
speak so ill of something so well intended, but it is what it is; and what it
|
|
is is a very bad show. 2.5.
|
|
|
|
"Cause and Effect"
|
|
Initial rating: 10.
|
|
|
|
Whew! Here's one I'm happy to say slipped not a bit for me. It's still one
|
|
of the best "variations on a theme" stories I've seen in a long, long while,
|
|
and is superbly written (and especially directed, in this case!) on all
|
|
sides. This makes the third spot on the top five of the season, and falls
|
|
on the short list of "TNG Episodes I'd Like to have Written." Great effects,
|
|
great concept, great characterization (both incidental and crucial), and
|
|
great *imagery* [the glass breaking], something TNG doesn't always do much
|
|
with. 10, now and ever.
|
|
|
|
"The First Duty"
|
|
Initial rating: 9.
|
|
|
|
This one came up. Yes, Satelk is distracting and badly done; but on a repeat
|
|
viewing, he seems much less consequential, and the rest of the
|
|
characterization is bloody *brilliant*. Locarno is still very interesting,
|
|
as basically a Kirk-figure a few steps over the line; Boothby is still a
|
|
treat; and the Picard/Wes conversation in Picard's ready room is still one of
|
|
the single most tension-ridden character scenes this show has ever assembled.
|
|
(And, of course, the fact that this was written by a fellow Cornellian
|
|
doesn't hurt either. ;-) ) 10.
|
|
|
|
"Cost of Living"
|
|
Initial rating: 1.
|
|
|
|
I shouldn't have bothered. Nothing seemed any better, and some of it seemed
|
|
worse. Alexander is *still* back where he was at the beginning of "New
|
|
Ground" in terms of character, Lwaxana is still stages beyond her most
|
|
unpleasant, Worf is *still* continuing the hideous trend of being an utter
|
|
laughingstock, and the holodeck sequence is *still* insulting to anyone over
|
|
the age of about five. I've been told, indirectly, by a member of the staff
|
|
that "in production, this didn't look that bad." I still have to wonder who
|
|
approved this. Ugh. 1.
|
|
|
|
"The Perfect Mate"
|
|
Initial rating: 6.5.
|
|
|
|
This comes up a little bit. The problems are still there (the Ferengi,
|
|
mainly, and the very early Kamala-as-sexpot scenes), but again seem less
|
|
consequential on a repeat viewing. (Drop those Ferengi down a deep dark
|
|
hole, though; and no, "Deep Space 9" does not qualify as such.) Again, just
|
|
as soon as she starts taking an interest in Picard, the episode picks up like
|
|
lightning hit it, and stays there for the rest of the hour. There are
|
|
interesting questions raised about being a metamorph (that are only partially
|
|
answered), and some intriguing use of mirrors for imagery here, too. I'd
|
|
give this one an 8.
|
|
|
|
"Imaginary Friend"
|
|
Initial rating: 4.
|
|
|
|
This isn't going to move much. Both Troi and Clara were well written a
|
|
somewhat well played (particularly Clara), but Isabella was in the absolute
|
|
bottom tier of TNG actors, and the plot had basically nothing to speak of.
|
|
(And that closing speech by Picard is one I could definitely have done
|
|
without.) Not a winner here, folks. 4.
|
|
|
|
"I, Borg"
|
|
Initial rating: 9.5.
|
|
|
|
This is likely to stay where it is. I still find Guinan's conversion over
|
|
from extreme anti-Borg to somewhat pro-Hugh a little fast for my tastes, but
|
|
as before, seeing the normally positive characters of Picard and Guinan show
|
|
this dark a dark side makes up for that in almost every way. Superb work on
|
|
the part of almost all involved, particularly Stewart, Goldberg, and Jonathan
|
|
Del Arco. Very, very nice. 10.
|
|
|
|
"The Next Phase"
|
|
Initial rating: 7.5.
|
|
|
|
Again, this seems pretty accurate, though this might slip slightly. Many of
|
|
the character bits here were nice (Ro's and Data's, in particular), and
|
|
there's some nice eeriness when Ro first finds out her condition. On the
|
|
other hand, this one has plot and plausiblity problems from here halfway to
|
|
Neptune, and this continues the post-Sela trend of making Romulans utterly
|
|
faceless and dull villains. (Please, bring back Tomalak; *anything* on the
|
|
level of "The Defector" would be wonderful.) Basically, this is pure fluff,
|
|
but it's fun fluff. 7.
|
|
|
|
"The Inner Light"
|
|
Initial rating: 10.
|
|
|
|
Simple. Beautiful. Quiet. Superb. 10.
|
|
|
|
"Time's Arrow"
|
|
Initial rating: 8.
|
|
|
|
Now, what was that I was saying about 45-minute prologues? :-) This still
|
|
has a start that's a little too slow for me, and the Riker/Troi/Data scene in
|
|
the turbolift is a waste, but other than that things are brisk; and the extra
|
|
bits of cleverness we've all discovered since (e.g. Jack "I'm the bellboy,
|
|
gotta love me!" London) impressed me a lot. Call it a 9.
|
|
|
|
So, if we were to take this solely as the sum of its parts, we'd have an
|
|
average for the season of just marginally under a 7. That feels somewhat
|
|
right, I suppose, but it doesn't give a hint as to the real situation. So...
|
|
|
|
General Comments: |
|
|
------------------+
|
|
|
|
This season in general, and especially the latter half, was an incredibly
|
|
*uneven* season. I'd heard occasional comments about how TNG had settled
|
|
into "formula"; based on what I've seen, I can't agree. If it were formula,
|
|
it would be likely to be consistently watchable but uninspired. Now, that
|
|
may be about what it *averaged* out to, but it by no means describes the
|
|
season as a whole.
|
|
|
|
I mean, for example, I'm looking at my ratings from "Ethics" onward: we had
|
|
in rapid succession: 5, 2.5, 10, 10, 1, 8, 4, 10, 7, 10, 9. That's not
|
|
formula, that's a mountain road. :-) Sheesh.
|
|
|
|
I suppose one of the best things to do in a situation like this is point out
|
|
good and bad *trends* in the season, rather than anything more concrete. So:
|
|
|
|
Two of the trends (mainly, the two distressing ones) are ones I've already
|
|
alluded to in the first part of this review. The first is Worf: This season
|
|
has seen, in my opinion, the slow destruction of everything that made Worf
|
|
interesting from seasons 1-4. I'm trying to compare the Worf I saw in "Sins
|
|
of the Father" and "Reunion" to the Worf I see in "New Ground" and "Cost of
|
|
Living", and I absolutely cannot see them as the same character in the
|
|
slightest. The old Worf was confident in his abilities, a bit rigid in his
|
|
attitudes, full of original thought when he gave it a try ("The Emissary"),
|
|
and an interesting balance of instinct and honor ("Reunion", mostly). This
|
|
one is Bozo the Father; ultra-rigid, yelling at the drop of a hat, utterly
|
|
clueless in a great many situations, and mostly spouting platitudes. Why?
|
|
What happened?
|
|
|
|
The other bad trend is much less important, given its occurrence: the
|
|
Romulans. The Romulans we saw in seasons 2-4 were interesting: distinctly
|
|
individual, bright, scheming folk that were usually very interesting to
|
|
watch. Now, the only one with *any* personality is Sela, and that's due to
|
|
origins I find abhorrent. All the others are faceless, for all we can tell;
|
|
the plots are a little more obvious, a lot less subtle, and a lot less
|
|
motivated. It's a pity, but since they don't get used that often anyway,
|
|
it's not a huge problem.
|
|
|
|
Now, on the other hand, there are some good trends. One of them is a trend
|
|
towards more "dark" endings to shows. TNG is often accused of being very
|
|
"sweetness-and-light", and to some extent that's justified and expected,
|
|
owing to the underlying ideals. But the lesson seems to finally be hitting
|
|
home that an optimistic future does not *have* to mean an optimistic ending.
|
|
"Silicon Avatar", "A Matter of Time", "Darmok", "Violations", "The
|
|
Masterpiece Society", "Ethics", "The Outcast", "The First Duty", "The Perfect
|
|
Mate": all of these had, to some extent or another, very bleak elements to
|
|
their conclusions. And *most* of them ended up as stronger stories as a
|
|
result. There's nothing that says a bad ending is better than a good one
|
|
(after all, look at "The Inner Light", which I would say had a rather
|
|
poignant ending, but not a dark one), but having a story without any
|
|
sacrifice tends to be less interesting to me; and in just about every case
|
|
above, even if I disliked the show I had a little bit of respect for the
|
|
ending. This is a trend I'd like to see continue.
|
|
|
|
The other, equally interesting trend that I see came in during the season's
|
|
second half. TNG is finally, *finally*, starting to show a willingness to
|
|
play with its success, and do some experimentation. Look at some of the
|
|
shows we had since about March:
|
|
|
|
--"Cause and Effect". Time travel is nothing new, but this type of it
|
|
*certainly* is; and the idea of assembling an entire show over what can
|
|
almost be described as the same events through slightly different viewpoints
|
|
is almost unique. (Okay, "A Matter of Perspective" tried, but that was
|
|
internal; everyone there knew that's what was happening. They didn't here.)
|
|
|
|
--"The First Duty". A show set entirely on Earth? At the *Academy*? Wes
|
|
screwing up in a major, major way, and *paying* for it? Picard and Wes at
|
|
each others' throats in a real way (as opposed to early first season)? This
|
|
is new throughout.
|
|
|
|
--"Cost of Living." I can only assume this was an experiment. I've no idea
|
|
what in. :-)
|
|
|
|
--"I, Borg". Taking this approach to the Borg is a real risk (as the
|
|
anguished reactions from some people expecting nonstop action demonstrates).
|
|
But it's also an important step in keeping them viable, and it paid off.
|
|
|
|
--"The Inner Light". There's almost nothing about this one that ISN'T
|
|
experimental from a TNG standpoint.
|
|
|
|
That's a lot of experimentation for a three-month period. I like it.
|
|
|
|
This is also something I'd very much like to see continue...but with a
|
|
caveat. In the past, it's looked like TNG was going experimental, but it
|
|
seemed to fade. The reason, I think, was that the show failed to show the
|
|
courage of its convictions. The utter lack of fallout from BOBW1 and from,
|
|
for example, "The Mind's Eye", is a major disappointment.
|
|
|
|
Now, there are new challenges and new items around. *Do something* with
|
|
them. Don't let them drop by the wayside. Let's see, or at the very least
|
|
hear about, what Wes has now gotten himself into with this repeated year.
|
|
Let's see what impact "I, Borg" has, both on the Borg themselves and on
|
|
Picard's future attitude (whether his hope succeeds or fails). And for
|
|
heaven's sake, Picard *MUST* show the signs of his experiences in "The Inner
|
|
Light". Consistently, and significantly. I cannot overemphasize that.
|
|
|
|
I think that's close to it, but a few quick lists.
|
|
|
|
Characters worth seeing more of: Picard, Data, Worf (if this trend is
|
|
reversed), Beverly (esp. with Wes), Wesley, Troi (another trend; much of this
|
|
season she's actually been good, for a change).
|
|
|
|
Characters worth seeing less of: Alexander. Lwaxana Troi. Worf (if this
|
|
trend continues).
|
|
|
|
Directors who should be given more work:
|
|
|
|
--Rob Bowman. Come on, he hasn't been used in almost two seasons, and he's
|
|
still the best director of the crop. Where *is* he?
|
|
|
|
--Jonathan Frakes. Even if it means less time in front of the camera, he's a
|
|
far better director anyway.
|
|
|
|
--Peter Lauritson. Anyone who comes out with a rookie effort as good as "The
|
|
Inner Light" is a jewel that should not be let go of.
|
|
|
|
--Patrick Stewart. Just to see what happens.
|
|
|
|
Directors who should be given less work:
|
|
|
|
--Gabrielle Beaumont. We've got "The Bonding", "Disaster", and "Imaginary
|
|
Friend". All rather uninspiredly done, in my view.
|
|
|
|
--Chip Chalmers. "Ethics" was not a good idea, and it's added to such
|
|
credits as "Captain's Holiday" and "The Loss".
|
|
|
|
Writers who should be given more work:
|
|
|
|
--Brannon Braga. The plots are not always the best ("Power Play", "The
|
|
Game", and "Imaginary Friend", for instance), but Braga seems to have the
|
|
best ear for good character dialogue of all the staff writers. Combine that
|
|
with more plots on the level of "Cause and Effect" and we're in business.
|
|
|
|
--Naren Shankar. I know he's not a staff writer. Get him. "The First Duty"
|
|
was a superb first outing.
|
|
|
|
--Morgan Gendel. Same applies, except in this case it's "The Inner Light".
|
|
|
|
--Rene Echevarria. She helped on "The Perfect Mate" and wrote "I, Borg".
|
|
Sounds promising to me, particularly when you add in past credits like "The
|
|
Offspring".
|
|
|
|
Writers who should be given less work:
|
|
|
|
--Peter Allan Fields. "Cost of Living". 'nuff said.
|
|
|
|
--Sara and Stuart Charno. I'm sorry, but when one team is responsible for
|
|
both "New Ground" *and* "Ethics", it's a bad sign.
|
|
|
|
Well, that seems to be more than long-winded enough for a single season.
|
|
(Wait 'til the show as a *whole* comes to a close! :-) ) It's been an
|
|
interesting season; onwards to the future!
|
|
|
|
Tim Lynch
|
|
BITNET: tlynch@citjuliet
|
|
INTERNET: tlynch@juliet.caltech.edu
|
|
UUCP: ...!ucbvax!tlynch%juliet.caltech.edu@hamlet.caltech.edu
|
|
"Seize the time, Meribor. Live now; make *now* always the most precious
|
|
time. Now will never come again."
|
|
--"The Inner Light"
|
|
--
|
|
Copyright 1992, Timothy W. Lynch. All rights reserved, but feel free to ask...
|